The document outlines a 6 step process for evaluating resource play hypotheses: 1) formulating an initial hypothesis, 2) testing it with real world data, 3) rejecting, accepting or modifying the hypothesis based on the test, 4) repeating steps 2 and 3, 5) submitting conclusions for peer review, and 6) incorporating peer review comments.
The document outlines a 6 step process for evaluating resource play hypotheses: 1) formulating an initial hypothesis, 2) testing it with real world data, 3) rejecting, accepting or modifying the hypothesis based on the test, 4) repeating steps 2 and 3, 5) submitting conclusions for peer review, and 6) incorporating peer review comments.
The document outlines a 6 step process for evaluating resource play hypotheses: 1) formulating an initial hypothesis, 2) testing it with real world data, 3) rejecting, accepting or modifying the hypothesis based on the test, 4) repeating steps 2 and 3, 5) submitting conclusions for peer review, and 6) incorporating peer review comments.
Step 2 – Test Hypothesis with Real World Data Step 3 – Reject, Accept, or Modify Hypothesis Step 4 – Repeat Steps 2 and 3 Step 5 – Submit Conclusion for Peer Review Step 6 – Incorporate Peer Review Comments