Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sustainableleadership Lis707
Sustainableleadership Lis707
Claire Heilman
Melissa Bernasek
October 20, 2022
1
Introduction
In Rebekkah Smith Aldrich's book, Sustainable Thinking: Ensure your Library’s Future
in an Uncertain World, libraries are described as “empowerment engines” (2018, p. xviii) that
are positioned to provide people not only a place in which they can obtain access to new ideas,
but also a place that fosters resilience that transcends across personal needs into meeting the
needs of the larger community (pp. 17-20). Often, when one thinks of sustainability, they think
endure” (Aldrich, 2018, p. 41). It is people-centric and driven by a “triple bottom line”
framework governed by environmental, economic, and social equity factors (pp. 79-84). If the
library and its librarians are to uphold the Core Values of Librarianship set forth by the American
Library Association (2019), then they must begin to think and lead in ways that are future-
oriented and consider the economic, political, environmental, and social factors that impact the
sustainable thinking libraries, and thus librarians, can cultivate services that endure and evoke
Community Forward
The 2015 adoption of 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) by the United Nations
“provides a shared blueprint for peace and prosperity for people and the planet, now and into the
future” (n.d., History section, para. 1). Through making use of a storytelling platform, the
International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) has acted as an early
adopter of this blueprint and utilized it to establish, advance, and advocate for the role that
library institutions have in assisting society in its forward thinking attempts to achieve SDGs
(“About, SDG Stories”, n.d.). One of the many United Nations SDGs that the library can play an
2
active role in is quality education. This goal aims to ensure that all persons not only receive an
equitable education but also that people are positioned to pursue lifelong learning (n.d., 17 Goals
section). Through a quality education that begins in childhood, people are able to develop the
necessary information literacy skills required to assist in the advancement of a more sustainable
future (Repanovici et al., 2021). Through this development of literacy skills, people become
empowered to generate innovative ideas that lead to actionable solutions for combating many of
of multiple moving parts that make a cohesive whole. System thinkers see the big picture,
understand the need for iterative thinking, are interested in learning, and act upon new
information (McClam & Kennedy, 2018; Rogers, 2011). This analysis of a system requires
leadership that engages the larger community and reconfirms the crucial functions of the library
within. Systems thinking as a form of sustainable thinking begins with a catalyst. This does not
have to be an event or disruption that forces change and innovation. Rather, librarians can be the
starting point in procuring systems-driven changes that nurture the advancement of a more
sustainable future (Aldrich, 2018). Furthermore, the belief that the library is at the center of a
community must be supported with proactive advocacy made by librarians on behalf of the
community that they serve. An essential duty of a sustainable library leader is to actively seek
out opportunities present within the community to be included in that fall outside of the library’s
perceived domain (Aldrich, 2018). Conversely, by taking a more passive role in events or
legislation occurring at the state or regional level, libraries neglect to uphold their values
budget), socially equitable sustainability (e.g., maintaining multiple means to access technology
solutions) it would be remiss to not address the underlying connotation of the word. When
considering Aldrich’s (2018) idea of sustainability as “the capacity to endure” (p. 41) we must
According to the Global Footprint Network (2022), this year’s Overshoot Date was July
28th. This means that on this date the ecological resources that the earth is able to regenerate in a
given year were completely expended. Even more startling, if the entire world’s population were
to live and use the earth’s resources in the same way that the United States does, the Overshoot
Date would have been on March 13th. Our over-consumption of the earth’s resources is
notoriously having a lasting impact on the world by contributing to the furtherment of climate
change, which we are currently experiencing as more extreme natural conditions (e.g., extreme
heat and cold, and an uptick in the number of natural disasters). The decisions that society makes
regarding expenditure of the earth’s natural resources are only going to continue to have a
negative lasting impact. Ultimately, it is up to humanity to forage a way into the future that
utilizes the earth’s natural resources in a way that lessens the impact of our footprints.
Librarians are in a unique position in that they have the ability to act as leaders at the
way through demonstrating active support for those connected with the creation of policies,
current resources, and creating programs with experts in various fields that employ sustainable
thinking (Mindum, 2020). Moreover, since libraries act as a central hubs within communities,
4
sustainable thinking must be employed, so that the library can maintain its prominence. Kumar
and Sofiya (2019) suggest that all libraries should have a dedicated “Green Group” charged with
cultivating environmentally aware initiatives throughout the library such as ensuring energy
efficiency in lights and technology, environmentally friendly purchasing policies, and educating
the public on ways in which they can help (p. 20). Additionally, Kumar and Sofiya’s (2019)
ongoing global issue and steps to mitigate the impact of our previous inefficacies must be taken
Another essential element to consider when implementing green initiatives is the library’s
strategic plan. Zaugg (2015) states that a “strategic plan provides guidelines for moving into an
uncertain future” (p. 1). Through strategic thinking, another form of sustainable thinking,
described by Aldrich (2018) as operating on deliberate choices that are made with the idea of the
uniqueness of the community in mind (p. 40), library staff, as well as community members, can
have an influence on future decisions and projects that the library will undertake. The role that
library staff have in ensuring a sustainable future for the library, and thus the community, in all
senses of the word—economic, environmental, and equitable—is immense, and the importance
of the need for a future-oriented plan need not be lost within the confines of the perceived place
of the library within a given community. In developing a strategic plan that focuses on
sustainability, library leaders must remember that an equally important factor in the creation of
said plan is marketing and transparency of the library services and goals. Without ample
promotion, the work that the library does in supporting the sustainability of the community will
be unrecognized.
workforce, and the multitude of other variables that feed into the overall well-being of the
establishment. Sustainable leaders are transparent in that they openly discuss the reasons behind
their future-oriented decisions (McClam & Kennedy, 2018; Aldrich, 2018); form collaborative
partnerships that aid in the development of programs and policies for sustainable communities
(Michael, 2010); and develop new mental models for thinking about change while engaging staff
and stakeholders in the process (Marcum, 2009; Aldrich, 2018). These aforementioned qualities
present within sustainable thought leadership only begin to skim the surface of what makes
someone a good leader. It must not be forgotten that a good leader does not have to hold a
specific title. Rather, a leader is someone who takes initiative, speaks up when they notice an
area in need of improvement, upholds and acts upon the mission of the institution, and
collaborates with others. However, in order for organizations to move in a forward projection,
there must be people in leadership positions that are willing to see the lasting impacts that every
decision, big and small, has on society. In considering the sustainability of a given decision,
people in leadership positions must bear in mind the challenges that come with initiatives
Change is hard on all parties impacted, but through sound leadership change is obtainable
for any institution. Aldrich (2018) makes the case that there are three phases for leaders to
champion in order to successfully effectuate change within an organization. The first phase
requires that leadership makes a positive case for change; the how and why behind each decision
must be supported, and transparency must be obtained in order for people to buy into the ideation
of the impending change. The second phase asks leaders to translate the vision and goals for
change clearly and concisely into results-driven initiatives that have measurable outputs. Lastly,
6
the third phase requires people in leadership roles to identify the organization as a community
leader and make its initiatives visible to the larger community who may not be completely aware
of the various things that the organization is doing to create a positive impact on the community
leadership qualities that libraries and their staff must employ to effect positive lasting impacts on
society.
Conclusion
Sustainable thinking requires nothing more than the average person to look towards the
future and ask themselves if the systems that they interact with encourage growth, or at the very
least, can be maintained without overconsuming and dissipating resources. Sustainable thinkers
must ask themselves the following questions: is the budget being spent on items that can
(mostly) stand against the test of time? Are resources provided being utilized and if not, how can
they be upcycled rather than discarded? Are there policies in place that reflect the institution's
stances on their environmental and economic impact on the community? How is the institution
acting upon social inequities present within society in a holistic manner? How is the institution
These questions act as a starting point in the process of building sustainable thought
leadership skills. Although they do not fully encompass every nuanced thought or question that
can be asked, they encourage one to consider their place in the development of a more
sustainable future. The reality is that the state of the world rests on our shoulders. I say this not to
instill fear, but rather to encourage LIS professionals to utilize the knowledge that has been
uncovered by years of people thinking sustainably to consider the big picture impacts of daily
inquisitive mind and a strong desire to play an active role in the development of a resilient
community with the hopes of creating a more sustainable future for all.
8
References
“About, SDG Stories”. (n.d.). IFLA Library Map of the World. Retrieved October 17, 2022,
from https://librarymap.ifla.org/sdg-stories-about
Aldrich, R. (2018). Sustainable thinking: Ensuring your library’s future in an uncertain world.
ALA Editions.
American Library Association. (2019, January) Core values of librarianship. Advocacy,
Legislation & Issues. Retrieved October 17, 2022, from
https://www.ala.org/advocacy/intfreedom/corevalues
Global Footprint Network. (2022). Country overshoot days 2022. Earth Overshoot Day.
Retrieved October 17, 2022, from https://www.overshootday.org/newsroom/country-
overshoot-days/
Kumar, P.K., & Sofiya, A. (2019). Application of green concepts in the libraries of
Thiruvananthapuram: an investigation. Library Philosophy and Practice, 1–20.
Marcum, J. (2009). Design for sustainability. The Bottom Line, 22(1), 9–12.
https://doi.org/10.1108/08880450910955378
McClam, S., & Kennedy, A. (2018). Sustainable thinking. Westchester County Business Journal,
54(36), 17–18.
Michael, A. (2010). Libraries and Sustainability in Developing Countries: Leadership Models
Based on Three Successful Organizations. Collaborative Librarianship, 2(2), 65–73.
https://doi.org/10.29087/2010.2.2.06
Mindum, K. (2020). Leading a greener library. INCITE, 41(3/4), 18.
https://doi.org/10.3316/ielapa.084668240023713
Repanovici, A., Salcă Rotaru, C., & Murzea, C. (2021). Development of Sustainable Thinking by
Information Literacy. Sustainability, 13(3), 1287–. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031287
Rogers, K. (2011). Leading sustainability. In W. Mobley, M. Li & Y. Wang (Eds.), Advances in
Global Leadership (Vol. 6, pp. 137–153). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
https://doi.org/10.1108/S1535-1203(2011)0000006010
United Nations. (n.d.). The 17 goals: Sustainable development. United Nations. Retrieved
October 17, 2022, from https://sdgs.un.org/goals#history
Zaugg, H. (2015). Using a Library Impact Map to Assist Strategic Planning in Academic
Libraries. Library Leadership & Management, 29(3), 1–17.