Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Foundation of Morality
Foundation of Morality
INVITATION
DOticular lesson aims to present the actual foundation of morality. The first p
intends fo provide a general idea concerning how morality is established. Specitcaly if interc
O nignighi that while ethics and morality can be based on different scnoos d i g dvere
neorles. there are basic concepts that are agreeable to many that serve ds tS genesi.
Tre
next two discuSsions and its subsequent ones, shall be on the basic foundations ot morait,
namely. rationality and impartiality.
LEARNINGcOMPETENCIES
At the end of the lesson, the students are expected to
1. Understand the general idea regarding the genesis concerning the foundation of morality
2. Be familiar with the importance of rationality as the governing principle that guicdes man
ethical decision, and
3. Know the value of inpartiality. of how it is crucial in the weighing of a person's choices ond
non-choices.
From the time of Socrates to the present. goodness has been championed as something
innatein man. Hence, fhe non-preserice ot goodness in someone is a Qvestion that drect
touches one's identity and nature. The aim of this part of the iesson is to arque that man's no
ture is goodness. The second and third part of this lesson, ori rationality and imparticolity wouid
of the argument even as a
provide the real foundation morality. and will sustain
context when he or she is expected to divert from that nature.
person is
in
Good
Ethics: The Art of Doing
ihe jumnp-shitt to evil easily.
AT THE HEART OF PERSON 1s
GOODNESS Almost all sci-fi films would ermbrace a
In one of the current trends of stance that wouid benefit society based on
postmodern cinema, it is nof rare that viewers the toundafion that humanity's way of thinking,.
watch films that attempt to depici a future is/her disposition, and the manner by which
SOciety that is apparently and obviously she conducis her relafions is as solid as ever
different from and unknown to US. Most of that is, at the heart of a person is goodness.
the fime, the plot of the story is structured ihe Matrix ends eventually in rebellion in the
within ihe idea Of an apocalyptic end toa second sequel and results to real liberation in
the final sequel. Avatar ends in ihe death of
society. or to what other film critics say. as
this pos1-apocalyptic end. The latter seems people who initially planned the manipulation
of the enviranmenf. Hunger Gunes and Star
fo put the problem io an absurd notch: the
Wars: The Lasi Jedi are both resolved in a clear
World is already destroyed and a person is left
hope that an empire's power isin danger of
wandering after its destruction.
destrucfion.
For instance, in the fim The Matrix,
Finally, the film serves as a cruCial key
shown in 1999 with a double-sequel in 2002
o howa person normailly operafes even in
and 2003, the human race is destined as mere
situatiorns when hoping is not even possible. It
batteries for the artificially inteligent machines.
Proves ihat man is consistent with his decision,
The film dramatizes the unfortunate irony of our
and h a t she would always prefer to be
power, fhat as humanity reaches the summit Ihe foundation of morality. then, is
rational.
of ifs strength, ihe ultimate end becomes its never outside the person. Goodness springs
Own destruction. in that supposed world
from something embedded within her.
and given that it is already destroyed, the
refurn to paradise, let aione its lost innocence
becomes a problem. The machines are able
dreamworld
t ocoy humanity by creafing a OF RATIONALTY
(Matrix). The Matrix is a computer-generated
of the worid's
program designed fo trick
man
actual condition.
Rationality has always been considered
as a power of man that separates himself from
the rest of ihe species. The capacity to reason
Thefilm poses ihis double-barrel truth is but an
dreamworld and proves fhat a person's desire for
problem: Will you live in a in-born ability. Man is born so as to know the
serve as mere bateries for the machines? OOr
truth. The power of reason is carved in a man's
will you opt for the real world, knowing that the that he forever carries with
SOul as something
world is totally destroyed?
himself.
How
would yoU ey.
fault.
are at fhat anot
borrowing probabilTy-
On ine ground o
first and
siay
also ironically
shows how be being too
ason. It
In all these, reason becomes the non-reasonadie.
reasonable becomes
Dackbone that makes an ethical
Ua
act established based on the value of its
reasonableness. From here, it can be inferred
that whatever is moral is reasonable. Or OFIMPARTIALuTY
whatever is not moral is non-reasonable.
ascertain the morality of
Let us take for example the idea ot human
Intrying to
act, what is the angle ihai one nas fo
its card. As to why you are getting the books Nevertheless, inasmuch as this
without permission, you reason that the queue
argument is of value, it must also be noted
at the library is crowded. It is Useless. yoU ddd, that any ethical decision is also informed and
too. since the books will nof be picked Surrounded
by by a subjective stance, and hence
It is not even hoarding, you a personal aspect of one's decision or choice.
anyone anyway.
mention. This is where impartiality enters. In fact, when
impartiality is taken seriously, and if a person
This Scenario can show how prior to any decision - has an informed reason
reasonableness can be in operaion. a n y agent can exhibit an impartial judgmen.
review the action. The act of borrowIng d as well. Hence, a person who does this is willing
never wrong in the first place.
To borrow is to
fo act based on intricate deliberation, making
to
ask someone (in this example the library) morality a collective act,
Use something (book) for the meantime upon
the premise that the same is returned on time. How, then, do
But using
we define impartialitye
Reading books is not wrong, either.
is another matter.
a book without permission Impartiality is considered as anothe
accountable as
The idea that librarians are side to the foundation of
the persons-in-charge in making sure that
the morality that invove
man's decision to always aim 1o decide To
alone available
books are mainiained, let are
what is just, equal, and balanced
and future used, must be taken weighing
for present things that are devoid of any biased
in great consideration. Hence. although or pre-judgment.
judgme
iS
tiality
that impa
becomes necessary, and hence, people feel We d o 11 CaUSe wWe wo
n o t because
still do the
procesS.
because of a cleat respe
a
ometimes, we know the end but w e We do if
fo tire ourselves. No. The point might surprise us actually.
be
'One procesS -
we might wio
DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:
decisione
moral
in terms his/her n of
A/ ndrural inclination of m a n whether an act is sOuna o
a r e the three initial w a v s of iudaina
nat ethical touriad
n Y Is reason considered to be a crucial aspect of
4. Why is impartiality important in one'smoral acie
honestly and consistently?
s there an absOUie
wayr
be observed
W a n impartiality
practicing how to be impartial?
CASESTUDY:
retail priCe of apple
The national suggested
Let usSay you a r e a vendor selling apples. allowed to coc
Commission (SEC). yOU a r e
IS 20 Php. Based o n the Securities and Exchange drastic hiker
to the
more percent due
1 0 o Over the actual price and some 5 -10%
c a n novw sell a piece
t apple tor 24 Pnp
Oil a n d fransportation prices. So it m e a n s that you
retailers, it wOuld m e a n m o r e produc:
Now, knowing that by buying more apples from large
decided to buy more. YOU have eventudy
COuld be bought at a cheaper price, you have
retailers getting less of their share of the
decided to hoard ihese apples that result to other small
have bought and in tact hoarded as many C
products. Reasonably so. as well, and since you
lower the price, knowing that you c a n still earn such a high proft
you needed, if will be to just
Nonetheless. you have still decided to sell the apples at the highest rate possible as known b
law.
Doing Good
Ethics: The Art of
SUMMARY
Bc1secdon fhe previUs discussion, thete ser. IoDe a l n l (olie i
to always choose what is good over whal is ovil. Allhogh i o o loll. , Ilil n i
capable ol evil n he same way as goodness, it is sle lo y 1hal uher, tured tn
nature, is what We struggle to a i , lel ilone hope lo
Reason and mpunlicality ure Iwo londalions of morality thal aker I n n ' d on o
infomed and tai. His cbility lo know lhe iulh ostablished he pound I al, waleve l e / l
decides to do, his act is based on the 1eanonalblornes ol lis el ility le c o p l , Iti eeel
weight, at least two Opposiny positions imake his/h choico odibe t d senitbe.
KEY TERMS
Morality - it is a pIactical and philosophical science thal deals with Ihe study of hoan ;a
principle of what is considered to be right or wiong, in knovwingg of what is good fiom wtl is bad.
Ethics-it is a practical and philosophical science that deals with he sludy of human acIs.
Theory-it is a scientifically acceplable general principle lhal isstill abshact, henceloth, it noeds
verificafion.
Society-it is ci groupof individuals that is bound by race, beliefs, blood, etc.; family is lhe basic
unit of society.
Recollect Ecducational Apostolate in the Philippines (REAP]
Apocalypse- it is an anciont wriling thit prrqhesie, (i ccatgrlym n t i (JJtuolys (ajitier fie.ity
NOrm i is principle of right uctio bin diriy ufon the rnenter: o1 G U p irid etving
gUIde, COnliol or regulate proper gnl ycc.optdtle: thfigat,
Argument -
ond
Arl f Driry
E t i : 1h