Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maritime Transpo - Part2
Maritime Transpo - Part2
Maritime Transpo - Part2
By ABANDONING:
As correctly stated by the appellate court, "(t)his rule is found necessary to offset
against the innumerable hazards and perils of a sea voyage and to encourage
shipbuilding and marine commerce. (Delos Santos v CA)
ABANDONMENT
It is equivalent to an offer of the value of the vessel, her equipment and freight
earned in return for an exemption from liability.
Note: When the right to abandonment exists, the shipper/consignee/pax cannot invoke Art. 1733
and 1755 of the Civil Code.
While the primary law governing maritime commerce is the Civil Code, in all matters not regulated
by said Code, the Code of Commerce and other special laws shall govern.
Since the Civil Code contains no provision regulating the liability of shipowners in the event of total
loss or destruction of the vessel, it is the provisions of the Code of Commerce, particularly Art. 587
that governs.[Chua Yek Hong v. IAC, 14 Dec 1988]
1. For civil liability to third persons arising from the conduct of the captain in the vigilance
over the goods which the vessel carried [Art. 587]
2. For the proportionate contribution of co-owners or the vessel to a common fund for the
results of the acts of the captain [Art. 590]
3. For civil liability incurred by the ship owner in case of
collision [Art.837]
When the ship owner or ship agent may be held liable for MORE than the value of the vessel:
1. When the vessel is PROPERLY INSURED – the insurance will take care of the liability the value
of w/c could be more than the value of the vessel
2. When the liability for REPAIRS of the vessel was incurred BEFORE the loss of such vessel
3. When the liability is one that arises from the provisions of the LABOR CODE
1. When the ship owner or ship agent is at FAULT – he is deemed at fault when the incident
arose because of lack of proper equipment of the vessel and technical training of officers
and crew
2. When the voyage is NOT maritime, but only in a river bay, of gulf
3. When the vessel is NOT acting as a common carrier but a private carrier
NO. He cannot be regarded as being in the place of the owner or agent in matters relating to the
responsibility pertaining to ownership and possession of the vessel [Yeung Sheung
Exchange v. Urrutia, 12 PHIL 747]
1. CHARTER PARTY
2. BILL of LADING
A contract by which an entire ship, or some principal part thereof, is let by the owner to another
person for a specified time or use, inconsideration of the payment of a fee.
1. CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT– owner retains control of the vessel; involves merely the
use of shipping space on a vessel, leased by the owner in part or as a whole, to carry
goods for others, and may either be a:
a. TIME CHARTER– a contract to use the vessel for a particular period of time
b. VOYAGE CHARTER– a contract for the hire of a vessel for one or a series of voyage
1. BAREBOAT OR DEMISE– involves the transfer of full possession and control of the vessel for
the period covered by the contract; the entire command of the vessel, possession and
control over its navigation, including the master and crew are turned over to the charterer
1. Common Carrier
b. Bareboat or Demise Charter – it becomes a private carrier for the particular charter
2. Private Carrier – retains its status as a private carrier
He is a demise or bareboat charterer to whom the owner of the vessel has completely and
exclusively relinquished possession, command and navigation of the vessel
NO. He cannot be regarded as being in the place of the owner or agent in matters relating
to the responsibility pertaining to ownership and possession of the vessel [Yeung Sheung
Exchange v. Urrutia, 12 PHIL 747]
1. CHARTER PARTY
2. BILL of LADING
A contract by which an entire ship, or some principal part thereof, is let by the owner to
another person for a specified time or use, inconsideration of the payment of a fee.
1. CONTRACT OF AFFREIGHTMENT– owner retains control of the vessel; involves merely the
use of shipping space on a vessel, leased by the owner in part or as a whole, to carry goods
for others, and may either be a:
a. TIME CHARTER– a contract to use the vessel for a particular period of time
b. VOYAGE CHARTER– a contract for the hire of a vessel for one or a series of
voyage
2. BAREBOAT OR DEMISE– involves the transfer of full possession and control of the vessel for
the period covered by the contract; the entire command of the vessel, possession and control
over its navigation, including the master and crew are turned over to the charterer
Definition of Terms:
a. to the master or owner of the vessel for the use of his cables and ropes to discharge the
goods, and
b. to the mariners for lading and unlading in any port
Distinctions
If the leased property is sold to one who knows If the vessel is sold to another, the new
of the existence of the lease contract, the new owner cannot be compelled to respect the
owner of the property must respect the lease CP for as long as the new owner can load
the vessel with his own cargo
Risks, Damages and Accidents of Maritime Commerce Averages[Art. 806-816, 665-677, 732]
1. All extraordinary or accidental expenses which may be incurred during the voyage for the
preservation of the vessel, cargo, or both
2. All damages or deterioration:
The petty and ordinary expenses incident to navigation such as those of:
1. pilotage of coast and ports,
2. lighterage,
3. towage,
4. anchorage,
5. inspection,
6. health,
7. quarantine,
8. lazaretto, and
9. other so called port expenses, costs of barges, and unloading, until the goods are placed
on the wharf, and
10. Other usual expenses of navigation
Who Shall Defray or Reimburse the Ordinary or Petty Expenses [Art. 807]
1. Simple or Particular
2. General Particular Average
All the expenses and damage caused to the vessel or to her cargo which have
NOT inured to the common benefit and profit of ALL the persons interested in the vessel and
her cargo
The OWNER of the things which gave rise to the expenses or suffered the damage
All the damages and expenses which are DELIBERATELY CAUSED in order to save the vessel,
her cargo, or both at the same time from a REAL KNOWN risk
Risks, Damages and Accidents of Maritime Commerce Averages[Art. 806-816, 665-677, 732]
1. All extraordinary or accidental expenses which may be incurred during the voyage for the
preservation of the vessel, cargo, or both
The petty and ordinary expenses incident to navigation such as those of:
Who bears the loss? All the persons having an interest in the vessel and cargo therein at the
time of the occurrence of the average shall contribute
1. There must be a common danger, a danger in which ship, cargo and crew all participate
2. For the common safety or for the purpose of avoiding an imminent peril, part of the vessel
or cargo or both is sacrificed deliberately
3. This attempt to avoid the imminent peril must be successful in a sense that the vessel and
some of the cargo are saved
4. The expenses were incurred or damages were afflicted after taking the proper legal steps
and authority
Distinctions
GENERAL PARTICULAR
Deliberately caused in order to save the May be due to causes other than a
vessel or cargo or both deliberate act
Inures to the benefit of those interested in Does not inure to the common benefit of
the vessel or her cargo all persons interested in the vessel and
her cargo
Shall be shared and contributed to by all Shall be borne by the owner of the things
persons benefited damaged
Art. 677. Effect of a Declaration of War or Blockade on a Charter Party:
• The charter party shall remain in force – if the captain should not have any instruction from
the charterer
• At said port- captain must request and await orders from the shippers
• Expenses and salaries accruing during detention in said port shall be paid as general
average
• If, by order of the shipper, the cargo should be discharged at the port of arrival, the freight
for the voyage out shall be paid in full
• The arrival of the vessel at the nearest and most convenient port
• Because the vessel CANNOT continue the trip to the port of destination
• On account of:
o Lack of provisions,
o Well founded fear of seizure, privateers or pirates, or
o By reason of any accident of the sea disabling the vessel to navigate
First Ground: Lack of provisions; When Not Considered Lawful [Art. 820]
• If the lack of provisions should arise from the failure to take the necessary provisions for the
voyage according to the usage and customs, or
• If they should have been rendered useless or lost through bad stowage or negligence in
their care
Second Ground: Well-founded fear of seizure, privateers or pirates; When Not Considered
Lawful [Art. 820]
If the risk of the enemies, privateers, or pirates should not have been:
1. well known,
2. manifest, and
3. based on positive and provable acts
Third Ground: By reason of any accident of the sea disabling the vessel to navigate; When Not
Considered Lawful [Art. 820]
• If the defect of the vessel should have arisen from the fact that she was not repaired,
rigged, equipped, and prepared in a manner suitable for voyage, or from some erroneous
orders of the captain
• Whenever malice, negligence, lack of foresight, or want of skill on the part of the captain
exists in actually causing the damage
Collisions[Art. 827-838]
Definitions:
1. In a strict sense:
2. In a broad sense – collision includes allision, and perhaps another species of encounters
between vessels, or a vessel and other floating, though non-navigable object
Liability in Case of Collision; Who is at Fault: One vessel Said vessel shall be liable for:
1. damage caused to the innocent vessel, and
2. damages suffered by the owners of the cargo of:
a. the innocent vessel, and
b. its own vessel
Who is at Fault: Both vessels[Art. 827]&It cannot be determined which vessel[Art. 831]
Error in Extremis
• Where a navigator,
• suddenly realizing that a collision is imminent
• by no fault of his own,
• in confusion and excitement of the moment,
• does something which contributes to the collision, or
• omits to do something by which the collision may be avoided,
• Such act or omission is ordinarily considered to be in extremis, and
• The ordinary rules of strict accountability do NOT apply
When does the rule of ―error in extremis‖ apply?
It must appear that there was an imminent danger and it is the actual risk of danger and not
apprehension merely that determines the question whether the error is one in extremis
What kind of AVERAGE is damage caused by a collision due to a storm or force majeure?
The injury shall be considered as a particular average of the vessel run into [Art. 832]
Can the ship owner raise the defense that he exercised the diligence of Good Father Of a
Family in the selection and supervision of the captain?
• Culpa Contractual – NO
• Culpa Aquiliana – YES except in cases of collision when both parties or vessel are at fault
• Culpa Criminal – NO