This document discusses various historical methods used to detect deception, including ordeals involving fire, water, combat, and consumption of poison. It notes that these methods invoked spirits or deities to protect the innocent. It then outlines verbal and non-verbal cues that may indicate deception, such as inconsistent or vague statements, delays in answering, anger, swearing, contradictions, increased physiological signs of stress, and facial expressions that differ from the message being conveyed. Overall, the document analyzes historical and modern techniques for lie detection and discerning truth from deception.
This document discusses various historical methods used to detect deception, including ordeals involving fire, water, combat, and consumption of poison. It notes that these methods invoked spirits or deities to protect the innocent. It then outlines verbal and non-verbal cues that may indicate deception, such as inconsistent or vague statements, delays in answering, anger, swearing, contradictions, increased physiological signs of stress, and facial expressions that differ from the message being conveyed. Overall, the document analyzes historical and modern techniques for lie detection and discerning truth from deception.
This document discusses various historical methods used to detect deception, including ordeals involving fire, water, combat, and consumption of poison. It notes that these methods invoked spirits or deities to protect the innocent. It then outlines verbal and non-verbal cues that may indicate deception, such as inconsistent or vague statements, delays in answering, anger, swearing, contradictions, increased physiological signs of stress, and facial expressions that differ from the message being conveyed. Overall, the document analyzes historical and modern techniques for lie detection and discerning truth from deception.
other people or when it violates the law. • Commonly, it is due to fear of detection that one has committed something undesirable or would like to preserve something valuable. • people often tell the seemingly harmless white lies" to avoid hurting the feelings of another person or to avoid embarrassment. I. Ancient Methods of Detecting Deception II. Observation Method III. Hypnotism IV. Word Association Test V. Narco-Hypnosis and Narcoanalysis (Truth Serum) VI. Intoxication VII. Psychological Stress Evaluator VIII. Polygraph Test Technique When these methods were applied, the intervention of spirits and deities was invoked to protect the person supposedly telling the truth. If the accused got injured or failed the test, then the commensurate punishment will be imposed. Red Hot Iron Ordeal • Hill Tribe of North Bengal, India • Bar of red-hot-iron while he walked nine marked paces • No burns appears on his hands, he is adjudged innocent • Hanged promptly Ordeal by Balance • Institute if Vishnu, India • One end of the scale the accused is placed and on the other end is a counterbalance • Step out of the scale and listen to a judge deliver an exhortation on balance and get back in • Lighter than before, he should be acquitted Ordeal by Water The water was symbolic of the flood of the Old Testament where it showed that water washed sins from the face of the Earth, allowing only the righteous minority to survive. Boiling Water Ordeal • Laws of Althestan, first king of England • Lifting stone out of a boiling water, with the hand inserted as deep as the wrist • Burn was bandage for three days before the fateful examination Cold Water Ordeal • Usual mode of trial for person accused being a witch • Accused’s feet and hand will be tied and lowered to the cold water by rope • This rope is tied around the defendant’s waist. • If both knot and accused dipped beneath the surface of the water, the accused is proven innocent • If the knot is dry or if the water refused to received him, the defendant was guilty. Ordeal by Rice Chewing • Eats a Sathee rice with the face to the east and then spits upon a pea leaf • If saliva is mixed with blood or the corner of the mouth swells or he trembles, he is declared to be a liar • Indian practiced this ordeal Trial by Combat • The aggrieved party claimed the right to fight the alleged offender or to pay a champion to fight for him • Victor is said to win not because of his strength but because of supernatural powers that had intervened on the side of the right Test of the Eucharist • Applied chiefly among the clergy and monks • When they took the host, it was believed that God would smite the guilty with sickness or death • Others believed, if the accused is innocent when given a poisonous drink for him to take in, the Angel Gabriel will descend from heaven to prevent the innocent form taking in the poisonous drinks. Ordeal of the Bier • Ancient belief that the slain dead could point out their killer • When the murderer is near; he (corpse) began to bleed again. Ordeal of the Needle • A red-hot needle was made to pierce the lower lip of the alleged criminal • If blood flowed from the wound, he was deemed guilty, but if none, he is innocent Ordeal by Heat • The accused will walked barefoot over red-hot coals, or made to walk through fire • If he was unharmed, he was considered innocent Ordeal of the Tiger • Practiced in Siam • The accused and the accuser are place inside a cage of a tiger, if the tiger spares one of them, he is considered innocent A subject under stress on account of the stimulation of the sympathetic nervous system may exhibit changes which may be used as a potential clue of deception. One or more combination of these signs are not conclusive or reliable proof of the guilt of the subject, their presences infers further investigation to ascertain the truth of the impression. A deceptive subject can learn to control the muscles of his face and body; and may present a poker face in an attitudinal innocence. The spoken words and facial expressions of the subject should be the focus of observation when interrogating a suspect.
Verbal Clues Non-Verbal Clues Words that are spoken Speed of delivery of the words Tone of voice Tense of the language
Truthful people tend to be direct
Untruthful people tend to be cautious about their answers Truthful people answers immediately after the question is asked Untruthful people takes their time in giving a response Delaying tactic: “who me?”, “why would I do that?” Another means for the deceiver to gain time to frame his or her answer. Question may be repeated word per word, or the respondent may frame the answer with a request to repeat the question “Are you asking me if I took the bribe?” Untruthful person often speaks in disjointed or curtailed sentences “I…I can’t think…” Many liars will speak half-truth as well and qualifiers “…to the best of my memory” or “…If I recall correctly” Anger is a common response to an unjust accusation, as well as answering the statement with abrupt “No” A deceptive persons sometimes tends to be overly polite Lying persons will frequently utter oaths “I swear to God I didn’t do it” “I swear on my father’s grave” “Hope to die” Most truthful persons do not need to swear or affirm Truthful subjects have no trouble denying the allegation in precise terms “Perhaps the amount was P100, 000.00” False ones will have problems with the used of words Untruthful suspects also tend to deny specific instances “I did not take P5,000.00 in kickbacks” Contradicting testimonies made by the witness If Pedro says that he meet Juan for drinks, and then later denies the same statement, there can be two explanations: he was mistaken, or he was lying. Body movements Gestures Facial expressions Body postures Positioning and movements used to explain chosen words Often performed deliberately Expressions made by the body, whose meanings are clearly understood. Shaking and nodding of the head Shrugging the shoulders Universal “thumbs up sign” Touching one’s self Grooming one’s hair Picking imaginary fur from a coat Props Cigarettes Pencils Body movement, fidgeting arise with stress Increase in breathing rate or volume may be a sign of deception
Too much sweating could very well indicate
an involuntary reflex in deception A dry mouth frequently accompanies deep emotion Often the subject is not aware of increased effort at swallowing Swallowing might indicate deception Other muscles are not easy to control, but people can control specific facial muscles To force a smile is easy, but even beginners will notice something is wrong about it Eyes express more emotion as any other part of the anatomy Blinking Pupil dilation Tears Face can have two messages: (1) what the liar is trying to show or (2) what he or she is trying to hide Reddening or blushing of the face can show strong emotion but is not a reliable sign of deception