Plato's Allegory of the Cave discusses philosophers descending from the realm of intelligence into the realm of sense and shadow. It introduces the distinction between what is real ("being") and what is not ("becoming"), represented by shadows on the cave wall. The descent of philosophers back into the cave is not just a sacrifice but a necessity to bring knowledge of true forms of goodness to society and motivate further improvement.
Plato's Allegory of the Cave discusses philosophers descending from the realm of intelligence into the realm of sense and shadow. It introduces the distinction between what is real ("being") and what is not ("becoming"), represented by shadows on the cave wall. The descent of philosophers back into the cave is not just a sacrifice but a necessity to bring knowledge of true forms of goodness to society and motivate further improvement.
Plato's Allegory of the Cave discusses philosophers descending from the realm of intelligence into the realm of sense and shadow. It introduces the distinction between what is real ("being") and what is not ("becoming"), represented by shadows on the cave wall. The descent of philosophers back into the cave is not just a sacrifice but a necessity to bring knowledge of true forms of goodness to society and motivate further improvement.
distinct impression for researchers because the theory is not yet formed as a product of thought, so that every researcher who plunges into it will be in various conditions based on their respective journeys through the Plato cave, but the problem is whether philosophers need to follow it if There have been many forms of goodness that have been formulated, while the activity of exploring the cave itself leads to a condition of uncertainty Preliminaries because it is to be and not being. on the limited dialectic of mathematicians exclusively on the obvious form, Socrates strongly disapproves of those who use sensible images for their research on their limited dialectic exclusively on the obvious form and caves themselves are distorted images, not lucid images. emphasizing on the philosophical journey from sensible to intelligent
The difference between
become and being was introduced by Socrates for the first time in the Republic in the theory of his cave, which has a close relationship and gives the distinction between sensible and intelligent, The sensible turns out to be not real or can be known by the human senses , the only knowledge they associate with their senses is knowledge of the forms that become copies, because the sensible was in fact degraded by shadows. Walaupun orang lain tak paham. The relevant question to ask is how does knowledge of the form of goodness motivate philosophers to come down?
Glaucon finally brings up his argument about
the kind of punishment he considers the motivation of a good ruler. There he argues, namely that there must be coercion on the authorities or punishment, because the motivation in the form of wages or fame is very shameful. punishment is to be ruled by someone worse off, if they don't want to rule themselves. And then they enter an office not because they enter into something good, or it will give them any benefit, but because they enter into something necessary and have no one better than themselves, or as good as themselves, to carry out the task. Conclusion The descent of the philosophers that Plato brought along in the cave back is not just a sacrifice of a worthy life from them, but is a necessity in bringing back the goodness that is aimed at the people and society, to know more about the forms of goodness that have not yet been formed and are still in the process of becoming or in a form that is not yet ideal so it is necessary to do a search on the realm of become to produce a better form of goodness
Responding To The Emotions of Others at Work: A Review and Integrative Theoretical Framework For The Effects of Emotion-Response Strategies On Work-Related Outcomes