WBCTi Response Mapping Filters (2022)

Block/Sub-pillar (4) Cooperation and Coordination

1. Information Exchange
 The Federal Police Administration cooperates in the fight against terrorism through the Counter-Terrorism Group at
the state level within Bosnia and Herzegovina as well as through Europol and Interpol at the international level.
 Through the EUROPOL communication channel CT SIENA, there is a constant international exchange of information
between nation Counter-Terrorism Units, between EU Member States, The Western Balkans, as well as other non-
EU countries that are operational partners of EUROPOL.
 The Federal Police Administration has a constant exchange of information with Europol and Interpol.

2. Mechanism of Coordination and Systems

 Strengthening mechanisms for coordination of relevant actors in local self-government units / municipalities.
 Establish appropriate frameworks involving NGOs, field workers, security services and field experts, to facilitate the
design of measures to effectively prevent the spread of violent extremism and terrorism.
 Support for the development of cooperation between security structures and civil society in the exchange of
information and data, and the preparation of joint assessment and analyzes.
3. Exchange Experience Expertise
 Continue cooperation and exchange of information based on best practices of rehabilitation and reintegration.
 Exchange of information and application of good law enforcement practices by European and neighboring partners.
 Learning from the models of European and world practices in regards to the legal solutions and their
harmonization.

Note: Those filters represent lines of the charts for the Cooperation and Coordination for the Pillar 1 WBCTi taken from the final draft of the Response Mapping methodology
subject for the Board approval. In regard to ToR reference (1. Objectives and tasks of the IISG, 1.3. Key outputs, “Annual Response Mapping”: this document maps, from a
regional perspective, the responses to the security needs in the areas of the three IISG pillars. The mapping covers the responses provided in the past year, and to the extent
possible the responses planned for the coming year), the response mapping report for year 1 should not wait the methodology itself. However it should follow the logic agreed
during the WBCTi working group sessions on the needs mapping. The IISG Secretariat consulted and concluded the list of the needs as well as the filters which report the
responses for the year 1 as referred above. Partners from WB are requested to send information only for the filters that had activity during 2021 and/or planned to have for
2022. As discussed during the consultations in December 2021, Partners can apply also by sending their annual reports on the given pillar if they choose not to report line by line
on the filter. In this case, the IISG Secretariat will transfer the annual report into the response mapping in regard to the needs agreed.