AvBwb mvjZvgvwg 2022

2022 mv‡ji ¸iæZ¡c~Y© AvBb Ges evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †KvU© (Avcxj wefvM I
nvB‡KvU© wefvM) KZ„©K cÖ`Ë Av‡jvwPZ ivqmg~‡ni mswÿß ch©v‡jvPbv

jÕ j¨ve
31 wW‡m¤^i 2022
 gyLeÜ

jÕj¨ve cÖwZeQi AvBwb mvjZvgvwg cÖKvk K‡i| GeviI AvBwb mvjZvgvwg 2022 cÖKvk Kiv n‡”Q| MZ
GK eQ‡i cÖbxZ ¸iæZ¡c~Y© AvBb I D”P Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍ mg~n GB mvjZvgvwg‡Z ¯’vb †c‡q‡Q|

cwieZ©bkxj mgv‡Ri Pvwn`v c~i‡Yi Rb¨ bZzb AvBb cÖYqb Ki‡Z nq| hyM wRÁvmvi Rev‡e AvB‡bi
weavb cwieZ©b, cwiea©b, ms‡hvRb, we‡qvRb Ki‡Z nq| GwUB MwZkxjZvi cwiPvqK| bZzb cÖR‡b¥i
wPšÍv †PZbv aviY K‡i fwel¨‡Zi AvBwb KvVv‡gv cÖYqb Ki‡Z nq| GB MwZaviv Ae¨vnZ _vK‡j AvBb
we`¨v `„p wfwËi Dci cÖwZwôZ nq|

AvBbRxex, wePviK, AvB‡bi QvÎ I wkÿK‡`i me©‡kl bwRi m¤ú©‡K AeMZ _vKv evÂbxq| D”P
Av`vjZ AvB‡bi †h e¨vL¨v-we‡kølY w`‡q _v‡Kb Ges Zv cieZ©x‡Z Aat¯Íb Av`vj‡Zi Dci eva¨Ki nq|
bwRi mg~n bZzb K‡i ch©v‡jvPbv Kiv nq| bZzb bZzb e¨vL¨v we‡kølY MwZkxj mgv‡Ri cÖwZwbwaZ¡ K‡i|
Gfv‡eB AvBbkv¯¿ gvby‡li Rxe‡bi mv‡_ cÖvmw½K n‡q D‡V|

mycÖxg ‡Kv‡U©i Dfq wefv‡M cÖwZwbqZ gvgjv wb®úwË n‡”Q| msm` KZ©„K cÖYxZ AvB‡bi e¨vL¨v we‡kølY
Ki‡Z n‡”Q| ZvB weMZ GK eQ‡i cÖ`Ë ¸iæZ¡c~Y© ivq I cÖYxZ AvBbmg~n ch©v‡jvPbv K‡iwQ Ges
mnR‡eva¨ fv‡e Zz‡j aivi †Póv K‡iwQ| Avgv‡`i GB ÿz`ª cÖqv‡m GKRb e¨w³I hw` DcK…Z nb Zv‡ZB
Avgv‡`i D‡`¨vM ¯^v_©KZv Lyu‡R cv‡e|

GB mvjZvgvwg‡Z i‡q‡Q 4 wU AvBb, Avcxj wefvM I nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi 19 wU iv‡qi mvi ms‡ÿc|
Zb¥‡a¨ cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bv‡ji GLwZqvi, †PK wWRAbvi gvgjvq ¯^vÿiwenxb †bvwUk, ZrKvjxb ¯úxKvi
e¨vwi÷vi Rwgi DwÏb miKv‡ii weiæ‡× AvbxZ gvgjv, `y`K KZ©„K GKvwaK †bvwU‡ki ˆeaZv, Rvcvbx
wkï‡`i gvgjv, PvKzwi bxwZgvjv I b¨vPvivj Rvw÷m Gi bxwZ f½ I ¯’vbxq miKvi wbe©vP‡b Kwgk‡bi
ÿgZv msµvšÍ ivq D‡jøL‡hvM¨|

Avgiv fzjÎæwUi D‡aŸ© bB| mgv‡jvPbvi Øvi me mgq Db¥y³| MVbg~jK mgv‡jvPbv Avgv‡`i c_ Pjvi
cv‡_q| Avkv Kwi †Lvjv g‡b Avgv‡`i fyjÎæwU awi‡q w`‡eb|

GB cÖKvkbvi mv‡_ m¤ú„³ mevi cÖwZ K…ZÁZv cÖKvk KiwQ|

(‡gvnv¤§` wkwki gwbi)

‡nW Ae †P¤^vi&m
jÕ j¨ve
A¨vW‡fv‡KU, evsjv‡`k mycÖxg ‡KvU©|

Page 1 of 28
 m~PxcÎ
¸iæZ¡c~Y© AvBbmg~n
1. wbe©vPb Kwgkb AvBb, 2022 ............................................................................. 3
2. evwYR¨ msMVb AvBb, 2022 .............................................................................. 3
3. evsjv‡`k †c‡U›U AvBb, 2022 .......................................................................... 4
4. Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2022 .......................................................... 5

Avcxj wefv‡Mi ivq mg~n

1. Eriko Nakano vs. Bangladesh ............................................................... 6
2. Secretary vs. Shudangshu Shekhar Bhadra and Others ........................ 8
3. Director General vs. Dr. Abu Saeed and Others ................................... 9
4. Bangladesh Biman Airlines vs. Intekhab Hossain .............................. 10
5. Abdur Rashid vs. Nurul Amin ............................................................ 11
6. Tipu vs. State ..................................................................................... 12
7. Md. Abdul karim vs. Mohammad Musa Kazem and others ............... 12
8. Barrister Muhammad Jamiruddin Sirkar vs. The State ...................... 13
9. Minaz Ahmed vs. Arif Motahar .......................................................... 15
10. Durnity Daman Commission vs. Md. Ashraful Haque and others ..... 16
11. Abdul Gaffar vs. Md. Abdul Miah ..................................................... 17
12. Terab Ali and others vs. Syed Ullah and others ................................. 18
13. The State vs. Kabir Biswas and others ............................................... 20

nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq mg~n

14. Jotindranath Mondal vs. Gouri Dasi ................................................... 21
15. Mizanur Rahman and others vs. Bangladesh and others .................... 22
16. Shahidulla (Md) vs. Election Commission ......................................... 23
17. Manik (Md) vs. State and another ...................................................... 24
18. Accom Travels and Tours Limited vs. Oman Air .............................. 25
19. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh vs. Bangladesh ................. 26

Page 2 of 28
 ¸iæZ¡c~Y© AvBbmg~n [

1. wbe©vPb Kwgkb AvBb 2022

2022 mv‡ji 29 Rvbyqvwi cÖavb wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi I Ab¨vb¨ Kwgkbvi wb‡qvM AvBb, 2022 cvm nq|
evsjv‡`k msweav‡bi 118(1) Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx cÖavb wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi I Ab¨vb¨ wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi
wb‡qv‡Mi weavb cÖYqbK‡í G AvBb Kiv nq| msweavb M„nxZ nevi `xN© 50 (cÂvk) eQi ci G AvBb
cÖYqb Kiv nq| G AvB‡bi 3 avivq AbymÜvb KwgwU MVb Kivi K_v ejv n‡q‡Q| gnvgvb¨ ivóªcwZ
Avcxj wefv‡Mi GKRb wePviK, nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi GKRb wePviK, evsjv‡`‡ki gnv wnmve-wbixÿK I
wbqš¿K, †Pqvig¨vb, evsjv‡`k miKvwi Kg© Kwgkb I `yB Rb wewkó bvMwi‡Ki mgš^‡q AbymÜvb KwgwU
MVb Ki‡eb| AbymÜvb KwgwU cÖavb wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi I Ab¨vb¨ wbe© vPb KwgkbviM‡bi wb‡qvM`v‡bi
Rb¨ †hvM¨ e¨w³‡`i ivóªcwZi wbKU mycvwik Ki‡eb| AbymÜvb KwgwU b~¨bZg 50 (cÂvk) eQi eqmx
evsjv‡`kx bvMwiK‡K cÖavb wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi I Ab¨vb¨ wbe©vPb Kwgkbvi c‡` mycvwik Ki‡Z cvi‡eb|
Z‡e IB e¨w³i ¸iæZ¡c~Y© miKvwi, wePvi wefvMxq, Avav-miKvwi, †e-miKvix, ev ¯^vqËkvwmZ c‡` ev
†ckvq Ab~¨b 20 (wek) eQ‡ii Kv‡Ri AwfÁZv _vK‡Z n‡e| Z‡e Ggb †Kvb e¨w³‡K mycvwik Kiv
hv‡e bv whwb Av`vjZ KZ©…K AcÖK„wZ¯’ e‡j †NvwlZ nb; whwb †`Dwjqv †NvwlZ nIqvi ci `vq n‡Z
Ae¨vnwZ jvf bv K‡i _v‡Kb; whwb †Kv‡bv we‡`wk iv‡óªi bvMwiKZ¡ AR©b K‡ib wKsev †Kv‡bv we‡`wk
iv‡óªi cÖwZ AvbyMZ¨ †NvlYv ev ¯^xKvi K‡ib; whwb ˆbwZK õjbRwbZ †Kv‡bv †dŠR`vwi Aciv‡a †`vlx
mve¨¯Í n‡q Kviv`‡Ð `wÐZ nb; whwb International Crimes (Tribunals) Act, 19731 ev
Bangladesh Collaborators (Special Tribunals) Order, 19722 Gi Aaxb †h †Kv‡bv
Aciv‡ai Rb¨ `wÐZ n‡q _v‡Kb; Ges whwb cÖRvZ‡š¿i K‡g© †Kv‡bv jvfRbK c‡` AwawôZ _v‡Kb|

2. evwYR¨ msMVb AvBb 2022

2022 mv‡ji 13 GwcÖj Zvwi‡L evwYR¨ msMVb AvBb 2022 cvm nq| e¨emv, wkí, evwYR¨ I
†mevLvZmn †`‡ki A_©‰bwZK ¯^v_© msi‣Y I Dbœq‡b evwYR¨ msMVbmg~‡ni f~wgKv, Kvh©µg, k„․Ljv I
`vqe×Zv mymsnZKiYK‡í G AvBb cÖYqb Kiv nq| G AvB‡bi gva¨‡g Trade Organizations
Ordinance, 1961 iwnZ Kiv nq| G AvB‡bi weavb Abyhvqx jvB‡mÝ e¨wZ‡i‡K †Kvb evwYR¨ msMVb
Zvi Kvh© cwiPvjbv Ki‡Z cvi‡e bv| jvB‡mÝ cÖ`v‡bi ‡ÿ‡Î A‡bK kZ© Av‡ivc Kiv n‡q‡Q| kZ©c~iY
mv‡c‡ÿ †`kx I we‡`kx wewb‡qvMKvixMY evwYR¨ msMVb wn‡m‡e jvB‡mÝ wb‡Z cvi‡e Ges ‡Kv¤úvbx
AvB‡b wbewÜZ nIqvi my‡hvM cv‡e| we‡`kx wewb‡qvMKvixi evwYR¨ msMVb wn‡m‡e Kg©KvÐ cwiPvjbvi
my‡hvM G AvB‡bi gva¨‡g m~Pbv n‡q‡Q| ‡Kvb msMVb kZ© cyi‡b e¨_© n‡j A_ev msN¯§vi‡Ki D‡Ïk¨
ewn©f~Z †Kvb Kv‡R wjß n‡j miKvi †h †Kvb mgq D³ msMV‡bi jvB‡mÝ evwZj Ki‡Z cvi‡e|

1
Act No. XIX of 1973
2
President‟s Order No. 8 of 1972

Page 3 of 28
evwZ‡ji Av‡`k ‡_‡K 30 (wÎk) w`b ci D³ msMV‡bi wbeÜb ¯^qswµqfv‡e evwZj e‡j MY¨ n‡e| G
AvB‡b `yB ev Z‡ZvwaK evwYR¨ msMV‡bi GKwÎZ (Merger) nIqvi my‡hvM i‡q‡Q| evwYR¨ msMVb
e¨ZxZ Ab¨ ‡Kvb msMVb ev †Kv¤úvwb †P¤^vi, G‡mvwm‡qkb, MÖæc, KvDwÝj ev Gjv‡qÝ kã e¨envi Ki‡Z
cvi‡e bv| ewYR¨ msMVb mg~‡ni Kvh©vewj G AvB‡bi Aaxb wb‡qvM cÖvß gnvcwiPvj‡Ki wbqš¿bvaxb
_vK‡e| evwYR¨ msMVb wba©vwiZ mg‡qi g‡a¨ wbe©vPb Abyôvb Ki‡Z e¨_© n‡j gnvcwiPvjK wbe©vP‡bi
Rb¨ 06(Qq) gvm ch©šÍ mgq ewa©Z Ki‡Z cvi‡eb| AwZwi³ mg‡qI wbe©vPb AbywôZ bv n‡j miKvi
cÖkvmK wb‡qvM w`‡Z cvi‡eb (aviv-17)| GQvovI ewYR¨ msMVb mwVKfv‡e cwiPvwjZ bv n‡j miKvi
wbe©vnx KwgwU ev cwiPvjbv cl©` evwZj Ki‡Z cvi‡e Ges D³ msMVb cwiPvjbvq cÖkvmK wb‡qvM w`‡Z
cvwi‡eb| G AvB‡b ewYR¨ msMVb I msMV‡bi m`m¨‡`i weiæ‡× gvgjv `v‡q‡ii †ÿ‡Î mxgve×Zv
Av‡ivc Kiv n‡q‡Q (aviv-20)| evwYR¨ msMV‡bi †Kvb m`m¨ wbe©vnx KwgwU ev cwiPvjbv cl©` ev
cÖkvm‡Ki †Kvb wm×všÍ ev Av‡`‡k weiæ‡× msÿzä n‡j 30 (wÎk) w`‡bi g‡a¨ gnvcwiPvj‡Ki wbKU
Avcxj Kwi‡Z cvi‡e| gnvcwiPvj‡Ki wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× miKv‡ii wbKU Avcxj Kiv hv‡e| Avcx‡j cÖ`Ë
wm×všÍ P~ovšÍ e‡j Mb¨ n‡e (aviv-24)| †Kvb e¨w³, cÖwZôvb, K‡c©v‡iU ms¯’v, †Kvb evwYR¨ msMVb G
AvBb ev wewa jsNb K‡ib Zv n‡j wZwb Ab~¨b 10,000/- (`k nvRvi) UvKv ev AbyaŸ© 1,00,000/-
(GK jÿ) UvKv ch©šÍ A_©`‡Û `Ðbxq n‡eb| g¨vwR‡÷U Av`vjZ KZ©„K G AvB‡bi Aax‡b msMwVZ
Aciv‡ai wePvi Kvh© m¤úbœ n‡e (aviv-29)| G AvB‡bi weavb Abymv‡i GLbI bZzb wewa cÖYqb Kiv
nqwb| ZvB 1994 mv‡j cÖbxZ ewYR¨ msMVb wewagvjv cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e (aviv-32)|

3. evsjv‡`k †c‡U›U AvBb, 2022

2022 mv‡ji 11 GwcÖj Zvwi‡L evsjv‡`k †c‡U›U AvBb, 2022 cvk nq| GB AvB‡bi gva¨‡g 1911
mv‡ji Patents and Designs Act AvBb iwnZ Kiv nq| GB AvBb Abyhvqx †c‡U›U A_© †Kvb D™¢veb
myiÿvi Rb¨ gÃywiK…Z wbi¼zk AwaKvi, hvi gva¨‡g †c‡U‡›Ui ¯^Ë¡vwaKvix Zvi D™¢veb Ab¨ e¨w³ KZ…©K
e¨envi‡K weiZ ivLvi AwaKvix nq| cÖhyw³MZ †h †Kvb cY¨ ev cÖwµqvi D™¢veb †c‡U›U‡hvM¨ n‡e| Z‡e
†mB cÖwµqvq bZzbZ¡ (Novelty) _vK‡Z n‡e Ges Zv wk‡í cÖ‡qvM‡hvM¨ n‡e (aviv-3)| `yB ev
Z‡ZvwaK e¨w³ mw¤§wjZfv‡e †Kvb wKQz D×veb Ki‡j Zviv †hŠ_fv‡e †c‡U‡›Ui AwaKvix n‡e| `yB ev
Z‡ZvwaK e¨w³ ¯^Zš¿fv‡e GKBiƒc D™¢veb K‡ib Zvn‡j †h e¨w³ cÖ_g Av‡e`b Ki‡eb, wZwb †c‡U‡›Ui
AwaKvix n‡eb| †c‡U‡›Ui AwaKvi DËivwaKvim~‡Î Ac©Y ev n¯ÍvšÍi Kiv hv‡e (aviv-4)| A‡bK¸‡jv
welq ‡c‡U›U myiÿvi AvIZvgy³ ivLv n‡q‡Q| Zb¥‡a¨ Avwe¯‹vi, ˆeÁvwbK Z_¨ I MvwYwZK c×wZ,
mvR©vwi ev †_ivwci gva¨‡g gvbe‡`n ev cÖvwYi wPwKrmv c×wZ, K…wl ev D`¨vb c×wZ, mvwnZ¨ I bvU¨Kjv
Ab¨Zg (aviv-5)| D™¢ve‡bi `vwe`vi e¨w³ GKK ev †hŠ_fv‡e ev AvBbvbyM cÖwZwbwai gva¨‡g †c‡U‡›Ui
Rb¨ †iwR÷ªv‡ii wbKU Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cvi‡eb (aviv-6)| †iwR÷ªvi mKj cÖwµqv †k‡l D™¢vebwUi
†c‡U›U gÃyi Ki‡Z cv‡ib A_ev cÖZ¨vL¨vb Ki‡eb| †iwR÷ªvi Dfq †ÿ‡ÎB M„nxZ wm×všÍ 30 w`‡bi
g‡a¨ Av‡e`bKvix‡K AewnZ Ki‡eb (aviv-18)| Av‡e`b `vwL‡ji ZvwiL ev †ÿÎgZ AMÖvwaKvi ZvwiL
n‡Z 20 eQi ch©šÍ †c‡U‡›Ui †gqv` ejer _vK‡e (aviv-20)| ¯^v_© mswkøó †h †Kvb e¨w³ ‡c‡U›U evwZj
ev n¯ÍvšÍ‡ii Rb¨ †`Iqvwb Av`vjZ ev †iwR÷ªv‡ii wbKU Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cv‡ib (aviv-23)| ‡c‡U›U

Page 4 of 28
msµvšÍ ÿwZc~i‡Yi gvgjv †`Iqvwb Av`vj‡Z Ges †dŠR`vwi gvgjv GLwZqvi m¤úbœ Av`vj‡Z `v‡qi Kiv
hv‡e (aviv-28)| Av`vjZ KZ…©K Av‡`k ivq ev wWwµ cÖ`v‡bi `yB gv‡mi g‡a¨ Avcxj `v‡qi Kiv hv‡e
(aviv-29)|

4. Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2022

31 AvMó, 2022 Bs Zvwi‡L eû cÖwZwÿZ Evidence (Amendment) Act, 2022 wej RvZxq
msm‡` DÐvcb Kiv nq| 3 b‡f¤^i, 2022 wej msm‡` cvm nq| cieZ©x‡Z 20 b‡f¤^i, 2022 Bs
Zvwi‡L AvBbwU †M‡RU AvKv‡i cÖKvk Kiv nq| mvÿ¨ AvB‡bi GB ms‡kvabx‡Z Av‡jvwPZ A‡bK weavb
ms‡hvRb, cÖwZ¯’vcb I evwZj Kiv nq| Zb¥‡a¨ Evidence I Document Gi msÁvq cwieZ©b,
wWwRUvj mv‡ÿ¨i weavb, mvÿ¨ AvB‡bi weZwK©Z 155(4) aviv wejywß Ab¨Zg| mvÿ¨ AvB‡bi 3 avivq
cÖ`Ë Document I Evidence Gi msÁv ms‡kvab Kiv nq| Digital record or electronic
record, Digital Signature or electronic Signature, Digital Signature Certificate,
Certifying Authority BZ¨vw` Awfe¨w³ mg~n (expression) ms‡hvRb Kiv nq| Evidence Gi
msÁvq d‡ibwmK mv‡ÿ¨i (blood, semen, hair, organ, DNA, iris impression, foot print)
weavb mshy³ Kiv nq| AvB‡bi 17 avivq we`¨gvb Admission Gi msÁvq †gŠwLK I `vwjwjK wee„wZi
cvkvcvwk wWwRUvj †iK‡W©i weavb mwbœ‡ek Kiv nq| mwbœ‡ewkZ 22G avivq wWwRUvj †iK‡W©i welqe¯`
m¤ú‡K© †gŠwLK mv‡ÿ¨i cÖ‡qvRbxqZv kZ©mv‡c‡ÿ bvKP Kiv nq| mvÿ¨ AvB‡bi 34, 35, 36, 39
avivq miKvwi †iwRóªvi I †iK‡W©i cÖvmvw½KZvi cvkvcvwk Digital record kãØq mshy³ Kiv nq|
AvB‡bi 45 avivq cÖ`Ë we‡kl‡Ái gZvg‡Zi weavb cÖwZ¯’vcb Kiv nq Ges d‡ibwmK mvÿ¨ I wWwRUvj
†iK‡W©i weavb †hvM Kiv nq| cvkvcvwk d‡ibwmK mv‡ÿ¨i wi‡cvU© mivmwi Av`vj‡Z cvVv‡bvi weavb
Avbv nq (45G aviv)| wWwRUvj mv‡ÿ¨i MÖnb‡hvM¨Zv msµv‡šÍ 65G I 65we aviv mwbœ‡ ewkZ nq|
wWwRUvj †iKW©‡K WKz‡g›U wn‡m‡e Mb¨ Kiv nq| kZ©cyiY mv‡c‡ÿ wWwRUvj ‡iK‡W©i welqe¯`‡K mvÿ¨
wn‡m‡e MÖnY‡hvM¨ e‡j weavb Kiv nq| wWwRUvj gva¨‡g cÖKvwkZ †M‡RU, m¤úvw`Z Pzw³ Ges wWwRUvj
†iKW©, wWwRUvj ¯^vÿi mvwU©wd‡KU m¤ú‡K© PyovšÍ Abygv‡bi weavb (Shall Presumption) Kiv nq
(mwbœ‡ewkZ 85G, 85we, 85wm aviv)| 146 aviv ms‡kvab K‡i ejv n‡q‡Q †h, Av`vj‡Zi AbygwZ
Qvov al©b ev al©b †Póvi wkKvi e¨w³‡K †Rivi mgq AZxZ PwiÎ m¤ú‡K© cÖkœ Kiv hv‡e bv| 155(4)
avivq we`¨gvb al©b ev al©b †Póvi wkKvi e¨w³‡K AZxZ PwiÎ m¤ú‡K© cÖkœ Kivi weZwK©Z weavb wejyß
Kiv nq|

Page 5 of 28
 Avcxj wefv‡Mi ivqmg~n

1. Eriko Nakano vs. Bangladesh3

11 RyjvB 2008 Bs Zvwi‡L Rvcv‡bi ivRavbx ‡UvwKI‡Z Rvcvwb bvMwiK Wvt Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bvi mv‡_
evsjv‡`‡ki bvMwiK Bgivb kix‡di weevn nq| Rvcvwb I gymwjg ms¯‹…w Z‡Z Zvu‡`i we‡q m¤úbœ nq|
Zviv 3 (wZb) Kb¨v mšÍv‡bi RbK-Rbbx| eo ‡g‡q ‡Rmwgb Gi eqm 11 eQi| ‡g‡Rv ‡g‡q jvqjvi
eqm 9 eQi Ges ‡QvU ‡g‡q ‡mvwbqvi eqm 7 eQi| Zviv wZbRbB Rvcv‡b Av‡gwiKvb ¯‹z‡ji QvÎx wQj|
2020 mv‡j GKwU d¬¨vU µq‡K ‡K›`ª K‡i ¯^vgx-¯¿xi g‡a¨ `~iZ¡ ‰Zwi nq| 21 Rvbyqvix 2021 Bs Bgivb
kixd ¯‹yj ‡_‡K ‡divi c‡_ eo `yB Kb¨v‡K wb‡q hvq| 28 Rvbyqvwi 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L gv Gwi‡Kv
bvKv‡bv ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z ev”Pv‡`i wR¤§v/‡ndvRZ ‡P‡q Awf‡hvM `v‡qi K‡i| 9 ‡deªæqvix
2021 Bs Zvwi‡L evev Bgivb kixd wg_¨v IRynv‡Z Rvcvwb KZ…c‡‣i Kv‡Q `yB Kb¨vi Wywcø‡KU
cvm‡cv‡U©i Av‡e`b K‡i| 17 ‡deªæqvix 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L wZwb `yBUv cvm‡cvU©B msMÖn K‡i| c‡ii w`b
evev ev”Pv‡`i wb‡q `yevBÕi D‡Ï‡k¨ Rvcvb Z¨vM K‡i| cieZ©x‡Z Zviv evsjv‡`‡k P‡j Av‡m| 31 ‡g
2021 Bs Zvwi‡L ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ev”Pv‡`i ‡ndvRZ msµv‡šÍ gvgjvi ivq cÖ `vb K‡ib Ges
gv‡qi c‡‣ ivq ‡`b| ‡UvwKI Av`vjZ evev Bgivb kixd‡K ev”Pv‡`i gv‡qi eive‡i n¯ÍvšÍ‡ii wb‡`©k
cÖ`vb K‡ib|
21 RyjvB 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L gv Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bv evsjv‡`‡k Av‡m| ‡m ‡g‡q‡`i‡K evevi KvQ ‡_‡K
‡bIqvi A‡bK ‡Póv K‡i wKš` e¨_© nq| AZtci 19 AvM÷ 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bv nvB‡KvU©
wefv‡M ‡nweqvm Kc©vm ixU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡i| 19 AvM÷ 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L nvB‡KvU© wefvM wb‡¤œv³
iæj Rvwi K‡i|

Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause
as to why they should not be directed to bring the minor detainees
who are held in the custody of the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 before
this court so that this court may satisfy itself that the minors are
not being held in custody without lawful authority or in an
unlawful manner and/or pass such other or further order or orders
as to this Court may seem fit and proper.
21 b‡f¤^i 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L nvB‡KvU© ivq ‡NvlYv K‡ib Ges ixU Av‡e`bwU Pjgvb iv‡Lb| Av`vjZ
evev Bgivb kixd‡K 2(`yB) ev”Pvi Kv‡÷vwW cÖ`vb K‡ib| nvB‡Kv‡U©i iv‡qi weiæ‡× Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bv
Avcxj wefv‡M wjf Uy Avcxj `v‡qi K‡i| Av`vj‡Z Gwi‡Kvi AvBbRxex hyw³ Zy‡j a‡ib ‡h, Bgivb
kixd `yB Kb¨v‡K ‡eAvBwbfv‡e gv‡qi KvQ ‡_‡K mwi‡q ‡bq| ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vjZ‡K AewnZ bv
K‡i Ges gv‡qi m¤§wZ e¨wZ‡i‡L evev Bgivb Kb¨v‡`i evsjv‡`‡k wb‡q Av‡m| Gfv‡e Bgivb kixd

3
16 SCOB (AD) 207

Page 6 of 28
AvBb wb‡Ri nv‡Z Zy‡j wb‡q‡Q| wZwb AviI hyw³ Zy‡j a‡ib ‡h, Rvcv‡bi cvwievwiK Av`vjZB
ev”Pv‡`i ‡ndvRZ Ges Kj¨vY we‡ePbv Kivi Dchy³ ‡dvivg|
Ab¨w`‡K Bgivb kix‡di AvBbRxex Av`vj‡Z hyw³ Zy‡j a‡ib ‡h, Kb¨vMY ‡¯^”Qvq evevi mv‡_
evsjv‡`‡k G‡m‡Q| Rvcv‡b Kb¨vMY evevi AvqËvax‡b wQj Ges Rvcvb Z¨vM msµv‡šÍ Av`vj‡Zi ‡Kvb
wb‡lavÁv wQj bv| AwaKš` Kb¨vØq gv‡qi mv‡_ _vK‡Z Pvq bv|
Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib ‡h, evev Bgivb gv Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bvi m¤§wZ QvovB Kb¨vØq‡K Rvcvb ‡_‡K
evsjv‡`‡k wb‡q Av‡m| evev Bgivb ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Zi Abyg wZ ‡bq wb| Av`vj‡Zi AwfgZ
wb¤œiæct

It also appears that the father respondent No. 5 without the consent
of the mother petitioner removed the girls to Bangladesh from
Japan. It is also admitted that at that time a Family Case for
custody was pending among the parties but respondent No. 5 did
not take any permission to bring the children in Bangladesh though
there was no injunctive order against him.
Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib ‡h, Bgivb kixd I Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bvi we‡q Rvcvwb I gymwjg ms¯‹…wZ‡Z m¤úbœ
n‡q‡Q| GB `¤úwZ A‡bK eQi Rvcv‡b emevm K‡i‡Q Ges Zvu‡`i N‡i 3 Kb¨v mšÍvb Rb¥jvf K‡i‡Q|
d‡j ‡m ‡`‡ki mv‡_ Zvu‡`i mevi wbweo m¤úK© Av‡Q|
Av`vjZ e‡jb ‡h, 28 Rvbyqvwi 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L gv Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bv ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Z
Awf‡hvM `v‡qi K‡ib| 31 ‡g 2021 Bs Zvwi‡L ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vjZ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib Ges
bvevwjKv Kb¨v‡`i ‡ndvRZ gv Gwi‡Kv bvKv‡bvi Kv‡Q ‡`b| GB mg‡qi g‡a¨B Bgivb kixd `yB
Kb¨v‡K evsjv‡`k wb‡q Av‡mb| GB Kg©Kv‡Ûi gva¨‡g ‡m ‡UvwKI cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Zi cÖwZ AeÁv
cÖ`k©b K‡i| cvkvcvwk ‡m gvZ…f~wg Rvcvb‡K Kb¨v‡`i DbœwZ Ges Kj¨vY mvab Kiv ‡_‡K ewÂZ K‡i|
Avcxj wefvM wkï‡`i ‡ndvRZ I Kj¨vY msµv‡šÍ AvšÍR©vwZK Kb‡fbkb, fviZxq mywcÖg ‡KvU© Ges
evsjv‡`k mycÖxg ‡Kv‡U©i ivqmg~n ch©v‡jvPbv K‡ib| Av`vjZ AwfgZ ‡`b ‡h, mšÍv‡bi ‡ndvRZ welq
wba©vib Kivi GLwZqvi cvwievwiK Av`vj‡Zi| Av`vjZ evev Bgivb kixd KZ…K Kb¨v‡`i wb‡q Avmv‡K
‡eAvBwb ‡NvlYv K‡ib| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi gšÍe¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances we are of the

view that removal of the detainees from the custody of their
mother petitioner is without lawful authority and they are being
held in the custody of respondent No. 5 in an unlawful manner and
the High Court Division passed the judgment beyond the scope of
law which required to be interfered. In this case only Family Court
has the jurisdiction to settle the question of custody of a minor.
The Family Court will look into the cases referred by the parties

Page 7 of 28
 and come to a finding in whose custody the welfare of the
detainees will be better protected.
Avcxj wefvM cvwievwiK Av`vjZ, XvKv-‡K AÎ ivq cÖvwßi 3 gv‡mi g‡a¨ Kb¨v؇qi ‡ndvRZ msµv‡šÍ
Pjgvb gvgjv wb®úwËi wb‡`©k ‡`b| Av`vjZ wb‡`©k cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, GB mg‡qi g‡a¨ Kb¨vØq gv‡qi
‡ndvR‡Z _vK‡e Ges evev mv‣v‡Zi my‡hvM cv‡e| AbygwZ e¨ZxZ ev”Pv‡`i Av`vj‡Zi GLwZqv‡ii
evB‡i ‡bqvq wb‡la Av‡ivc Kiv nq|

2. Secretary vs. Shudangshu Shekhar Bhadra and Others4

Rbve ïavsmy †kLi f`ª 1985 mv‡j wewmGm K¨vWvi wn‡m‡e WvK Awa`߇i ‡hvM`vb K‡ib| 2019
mv‡ji GwcÖ‡j wZwb WvK Awa`߇ii gnvcwiPvjK wnmv‡e wb‡qvM cvb| 2020 mv‡ji b‡f¤^‡i ‡Kvb
KviY `k©v‡bv I my‡hvM myweav e¨wZ‡i‡K Zv‡K eva¨Zvg~jK QzwU‡Z cvVv‡bv nq| 2021 mv‡ji
Rvbyqvwi‡Z wZwb Aem‡i hvb Ges Zvi †cbkb myweav eÜ ivLv nq| 2021 mv‡ji A‡±ve‡i Awa`ßi
Zvi wbKU †_‡K 19 †KvwU UvKv †Kb Av`vq Kiv n‡ebv- g‡g© GKwU †bvwUk cÖ`vb K‡i|
AZtci wZwb wb‡Ri †cbkb I Ab¨vb¨ myweav `vwe K‡i Ges 19 †KvwU UvKv Av`v‡qi ‡bvwUk ¯’wMZ
†P‡q wiU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM UvKv Av`v‡qi †bvwUk ¯’wMZ K‡i Av‡`k cÖ`vb
K‡ib| D³ Av‡`‡k ÿzä n‡q ivóªcÿ AÎ wjf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡i|
ivóªc‡ÿ GUwb© †Rbv‡ij wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M AÎ wiU †gvKÏgv Pj‡Z cv‡ibv KviY
miKvwi PvKzwiRxex‡`i wel‡q cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bvj GLwZqvicÖvß| Administrative Tribunal
Act, 1980 Gi 4(3) aviv Abymv‡i AemicÖvß miKvwi PvKzwiRxwe‡`i wel‡qI UªvBey¨bvj
GLwZqvicÖvß| myZivs ev`xi †Kvb †ÿvf _vK‡j wZwb cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bv‡j wM‡q cÖwZKvi PvB‡Z
cv‡ib| Aciw`‡K weÁ wmwbqi AvBbRxex Rbve cÖexi wb‡qvMx nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi Av‡`k mwVK g‡g©
wb‡e`b K‡ib|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi Av‡`k LvwiR K‡i †`b| Av`vjZ wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib †h,
AemicÖvß miKvwi PvKzwiRxweMণI PvKzwii kZ©vewji †ÿ‡Î cÖkvmwbK UªvBey¨bv‡j cÖwZKvi PvB‡eb|
wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

From the above provision of law it is abundantly clear that

administrative tribunal has the exclusive jurisdiction to deal with
the matters when a person in the service of the Republic is
aggrieved by any order or decision in respect of the terms and
conditions of his service including pension rights or by any
action taken in relation to him as a person in the service of the
Republic. In the present case, the writ-petitioner-respondent
4
74 DLR (AD) 222

Page 8 of 28
 No.1 is a person in the service of the Republic as per the
provision of section 4(3) of the Administrative Tribunal Act,
1980 and as such the Tribunal has the exclusive jurisdiction to
deal with the matter regarding the terms and conditions of the
service of the writ petitioner-respondent No.1.

wfbœ mKj ivq‡K Avcxj Av`vjZ per incuriam g‡g© AvL¨v †`b Ges †m¸‡jv eva¨Ki bq g‡g©
we¯ÍvwiZ Av‡jvPbv K‡ib| we‡kl K‡i evsjv‡`k ebvg AvLZviæb bex5 gvgjvq cÖ`Ë ivq‡K per
incuriam wn‡m‡e AwfgZ †`b| me‡k‡l, Av`vjZ WvK Awa`ßi‡K cybivq bZzb †bvwUk cÖ`v‡bi
wb‡`©k †`b Ges ‡bvwU‡ki Reve w`‡Z h_vh_ mgq w`‡Z Av‡`k †`b Ges welqwU AvBbm¤§Z Dcv‡q
mgvav‡bi Av‡`k †`b|

3. Director General vs. Dr. Abu Saeed and Others6

¯^v¯’¨ Awa`ßi 2003 mv‡j BDbvwb †gwW‡Kj Awdmvi, Avqy‡e©w`K †gwW‡Kj Awdmvi I
†nvwgIc¨vw_K †gwW‡Kj Awdmvi c‡` wb‡qv‡Mi weÁwß cÖ`vb K‡i| weÁwß Abymv‡i wjwLZ I fvBfv
cixÿvq AbywôZ nq| wKš` P~ovšÍ djvdj cÖKvk bv K‡i Awa`ßi 2003 mv‡ji A‡±ve‡i D³ cixÿv
evwZj ‡NvlYv K‡i| `xN© 9 eQi ci 2013 mv‡j ¯^v¯’¨ Awa`ßi D³ c`mg~‡n bZzbfv‡e wb‡qvM
weÁwß cÖ`vb K‡i| c~‡e©i cixÿvq DËxY© cixÿv_©xMY weÁwßwU P¨v‡jà K‡i wiU Av‡e`b K‡ib Ges
Zv‡`i wb‡qv‡Mi Av‡`k cÖv_©bv K‡ib| ïbvwbA‡šÍ nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiU Av‡e`b gÃyi K‡ib| ivóªcÿ
ÿzä n‡q Avcxj wefv‡M AÎ wjf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡i|
ivóªc‡ÿ GUwb© †Rbv‡ij wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, ev`xMY P~ovšÍfv‡e wbe©vwPZ nbwb Ges ZvB wiU Av‡e`b
`v‡q‡ii AwaKvi (No locus standi) Zv‡`i †bB | GQvov miKvwi wm×v‡šÍ D³ cÖKí mgvß nq
Ges bZzb cÖK‡íi Rb¨ cybivq wb‡qvM weÁwß ‡`qv nq| GB welqwU nvB‡KvU© wefvM Avg‡j MÖnY
‡bqwb| Aci c‡ÿi AvBbRxexMY wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, wjwLZ I fvBfv cixÿvq AskMÖn‡Yi gva¨‡g
PvKzwi cÖv_©xM‡Yi ˆea cÖZ¨vkv (Legitimate expectation) m„wó n‡q‡Q Ges Zviv PvKzwi‡Z
†hvM`v‡bi AwaKvix| myZivs nvB‡KvU© wefvM mwVK wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡i‡Qb|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM Avcxj gÃyi K‡i ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib| wiU †gvKÏgvi ev`xMY D³ c` mg~‡n
wb‡qvM cÖvß n‡eb bv g‡g© wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib| Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h, wjwLZ I †gŠwLK cixÿvq
Ask MÖnY Ki‡jB wb‡qv‡Mi AwaKvi Rb¥vq bv| wb‡¤œ iv‡qi mswkøó Ask Zz‡j aiv njt

The writ petitioners respondents participated in the examination

for appointment under HPSP project in the year 2003 and

5
71 DLR (AD) 390
6
Civil Petition for Leave to Appeal No. 333 of 2020

Page 9 of 28
 having regard to the fact that the said appointment process was
postponed and cancelled and on the plea of their participation in
the earlier written and viva examination, no legal and vested
right has been created in favour of the writ petitioners-
respondents to be appointed to the posts as allegedly vacant in
the new project. Mere participation in the written and viva voce
examination, if so facto, does not create any vested right in
favour of the writ petitioners-respondents to be appointed
automatically in the newly created posts in subsequent project.
AÎ iv‡q Avcxj wefvM ˆea cÖZ¨vkv (Legitimate expectation) msµv‡šÍ we¯ÍvwiZ Av‡jvPbv
K‡ib|

4. Bangladesh Biman Airlines vs. Intekhab Hossain7

AÎ wmwfj wcwUk‡bi ev`xMb wegvb evsjv‡`k GqvijvB‡Ýi cvBjU I evsjv‡`k GqvijvBÝ cvBjU
G‡mvwm‡qk‡bi †g¤^vi| 2008 mv‡j wegvb evsjv‡`k I GqvijvBÝ cvBjU G‡mvwm‡qk‡bi g‡a¨ GKwU
Pzw³ mvÿwiZ nq| Pzw³ Abymv‡i wegvb evsjv‡`k cvBjU‡`i Ki gy³ (Tax free) †eZb I Ab¨vb¨
myweavw` cÖ`vb K‡i AvmwQj| wKš` 2011-2012 A_©eQ‡i wegvb evsjv‡`k D³ myweav evwZj K‡i Awdm
Av‡`k Rvwi K‡i| AZtci D³ Av‡`k P¨v‡jà K‡i ev`xMY nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡ib|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Av`vjZ Zv‡`i Av‡e`b MÖnY K‡i D³ Awdm Av‡`k evwZj †NvlYv K‡ib| wegvb evsjv‡`k
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi wm×v‡šÍ ÿzä n‡q Avcxj wefv‡M AÎ wjf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡i|

wegvb evsjv‡`‡ki AvBbRxex Av`vj‡Z wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, wegvb evsjv‡`k cvBjUM‡Yi c‡ÿ U¨v•
cÖ`vb K‡i AvmwQj| wKš` c~‡e©i wm×všÍ cwieZ©b K‡i BbKvg U¨v• AwW©‡bÝ Gi aviv 50 Abymv‡i
cvBjUM‡Yi wbR wbR ‡eZb fvZv †_‡K U¨v• KZ©‡bi wm×všÍ cÖ`vb Kiv nq| GQvovI, ev`xM‡Yi h_vh_
cÖwZKvi Avwe©‡Uªkb Kiv; AÎ †gvKÏgv bq| cvBjU‡`i c‡ÿ wb‡e`b Kiv nq †h, wegvb evsjv‡`k
GKZidv wm×všÍ cwieZ©b K‡i 2008 mv‡ji Pzw³ f½ K‡i‡Q| Pzw³ cwieZ©‡bi †ÿ‡Î cvBjU‡`i Dci
K‡VviZv Av‡ivc Kiv n‡e bv g‡g© kZ© _vK‡jI wegvb evsjv‡`k †mwU f½ K‡i‡Q| Avcxj wefvM
cvBjUM‡Yi wb‡e`b gÃyi K‡ib| Av`vjZ gšÍe¨ K‡ib †h, †h‡nZz e¨w³ cvBjU wiU Av‡e`b `v‡qi
K‡i‡Qb Ges G‡mvwm‡qkb `v‡qi K‡iwb, ZvB Avwe©‡Uªk‡bi cÖwZKvi GB gvgjvq cÖ‡hvR¨ bv| wb‡¤œ
Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

With regard to the contention of the petitioner that there was

alternative remedy by way of arbitration, the High Court Division
observed that the party to the contract was BAPA (Bangladesh

7
27 BLC (AD) 181

Page 10 of 28
 Airlines Pilot Association) and the writ petitions were filed by the
individual pilots and as such the arbitration clause did not apply to
them...We find from the agreement between BAPA and Biman that
there are clear terms and conditions which are in no way unlawful
and therefore, the contract is binding on the parites. Thus, Biman
could not unialterally alter or vary terms of the contract in view of
article 1.3.1.

5. Abdur Rashid vs. Nurul Amin8

1993 mv‡ji 5B RyjvB byiæj Avwgb Ii‡d Avey Zv‡ni ivóªxq AwaMÖnb I cÖRvmË¡ AvBb, 1950 Gi
96 avivq AMÖµ‡qi Rb¨ gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| gvgjvi g~j e³e¨ nj- bvwjkv f~wgi g~j gvwjK
wQ‡jb ewj wgqv Ii‡d ewj gynv¤§`| D³ ewj wgqv Zvi GKgvÎ mšÍvb myRv wgqv‡K †i‡L gviv hvb|
cieZ©x‡Z myRv wgqv Zvi Iqvwik byiæj Avwgb Ii‡d Avey Zv‡ni, †m‡K›`vi wgqv mn Ab¨vb¨‡`i
†i‡L gviv hvb| B‡Zvc~‡e© myRv wgqv 18/02/1982 Bs Zvwi‡L GKwU †nev `wj‡ji gva¨‡g byiæj
Avwgb eivei 43 GKi f~wg n¯ÍvšÍi K‡ib| †mg‡Z DËivwaKvix m~‡Î I ‡nev `wj‡ji gva¨‡g bvwjkv
f~wg‡Z byiæj Avwgb mn-Askx`vi (Co-sharer) nb|

AMÖµ‡qi Av‡e`bKvix (Pre-emptor) ‡mŠw` Avi‡e Kg©iZ _vKvi mgq Zvi fvB †mKv›`i wgqv
bvwjkv f~wg weµq `wj‡ji gva¨‡g wd‡ivR wgqv (1bs †µZv-cÖwZcÿ) (Pre-emptee-purchaser)
eivei n¯ÍvšÍi K‡ib| cieZ©x‡Z 1bs †µZv cÖwZcÿ wd‡ivR wgqv Avevi 21/06/1992 Bs Zvwi‡Li
weµq `wj‡ji gva¨‡g Ave`yi iwk` (6bs cÖwZcÿ whwb bvwjkx f~wg‡Z Av‡M †_‡KB Co-sharer)
eivei n¯ÍvšÍi K‡ib| †mŠw` Avie †_‡K †`‡k G‡m D³ weµq m¤ú‡K© Rvb‡Z †c‡i byiæj Avwgb
Rv‡e`v bKj msMÖn K‡ib|
wePvwiK Av`vjZ AMÖµ‡qi gvgjv bv-gÃyi K‡ib Ges wm×všÍ †`b †h, †h‡nZz bvwjkv f~wg GKRb
mn-Askx`v‡ii Kv‡Q n¯ÍvšÍi Kiv n‡q‡Q, †m‡nZz AMÖµ‡qi Av‡e`b iÿYxq (Maintainable) bq|
wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi iv‡q msÿzä n‡q AMÖµ‡qi Av‡e`bKvix (Pre-emptor) ‡Rjv RR Av`vjZ,
jÿxcy‡i wewea Avcxj `v‡qi K‡ib| D³ Avcxj bv-gÃyi nq| ZLb wZwb nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M †`Iqvbx
wiwfkb bs- 714/1998 `v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM wiwfkb gÃyi Ki‡j Ave`yi iwk` (6bs
cÖwZcÿ) Avcxj wefv‡M †`Iqvbx Avcxj bs- 02/2005 `v‡qi K‡ib| Avcxj wefvM D³ Avcxj
bv-gÃyi K‡ib Ges wm×všÍ †`b †h,

“Even after subsequent transfer by the stranger pre-emptee to

another co-sharer of the holding, the pre-emptory right of a co-

8
74 DLR (AD) 135

Page 11 of 28
 sharer pre-emptor will not be defeated as because the subsequent
transfer is subject to the right available against the original
transfer.”

hw` AvMš`K †µZv cieZ©x‡Z bvwjkv †Rv‡Zi †Kvb mn-Askx`vi eivei bvwjkv f~wg n¯ÍvšÍi K‡i †`q,
Zvn‡j Zv Øviv mn-Askx`vi AMÖµqKvixi (Co-sharer-Pre-emptor) AwaKvi ÿybœ n‡e bv|
KviY cieZ©x n¯ÍvšÍiwU g~j n¯ÍvšÍi n‡Z D™¢~Z AwaKv‡ii Dci wbf©ikxj|

6. Tipu vs. State 9

1997 mv‡ji †deªæqvwi gv‡m ev`xi weiæ‡× wgicyi _vbvq GKwU gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| Z`šÍ †k‡l
cywjk `Ðwewai 386 Ges 323 avivq Awf‡hvMcÎ `vwLj K‡i| AZtci wePvwiK Av`vjZ
Awfhy³‡K `Ðwewai 385 Ges 323 avivq `wÐZ K‡i 10 eQ‡ii mkÖg Kviv`Ð I 1000 UvKv
Rwigvbv cÖ`vb K‡i| ev`x RxweKvi ZvwM‡` we‡`‡k Ae¯’vb Kivi Kvi‡Y mwVK mg‡q Avcxj `v‡qi
Ki‡Z cv‡iwb| wZwb 4543 w`b ci wej¤^ gÃy‡ii `iLv¯Ímn D³ mvRvi weiæ‡× nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M
Avcxj `v‡qi K‡i| Zvgvw`‡Z evwiZ nIqvq nvB‡KvU© wefvM D³ Avcxj LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| AZtci
ev`x D³ wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× Avcxj wefv‡M wjf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡ib|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM gZvgZ e¨³ K‡ib †h, ev`x ivq †NvlYv cieZ©©x mg‡q we‡`‡k Ae¯’vb
K‡i‡Qb| †`‡k cÖZ¨veZ©‡bi ci Zvui `Ð m¤ú‡K© ÁvZ n‡q †Kvb cÖKvi wej¤^ Qvov (on the
earliest opportunity) Av`vj‡Z AvZœmgc©Y K‡ib| D³ welqwU nvB‡KvU© wefvM KZ…©K wej¤^
gIKz‡di †ÿ‡Î we‡ePbvg~jK ÿgZv (Discretionary Power) cÖ‡qvM Kiv DwPZ wQ‡jv|
Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq;

The principle of law is substantial justice shall take

preponderance over technical consideration should always be
kept in view while deciding whether or not there is sufficient
cause for the delay.

D³ ch©v‡jvPbvi Av‡jv‡K mywcÖg †KvU© D‡jøwLZ 4543 w`‡bi wej¤^ gIKzd K‡i Avcxj wb®úwËi Rb¨
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M ‡cÖiণ K‡ib|

7. Md. Abdul karim vs. Mohammad Musa Kazem and others10

ev`xi wcZv PÆMÖv‡gi d‡Zncyi BDwbqb Gi wbKvn †iwR÷ªvi wn‡m‡e `vwqZ¡ cvjbiZ Ae¯’vq g„Zz¨eiY
K‡i| wZwb wcZvi ¯’jvwfwl³ nIqvi Rb¨ wewam¤§Zfv‡e weevw` eivei Av‡e`b K‡i| wKš` Av‡e`bwU
9
27 BLC (AD) 21
10
Civil Appeal No. 190 of 2007

Page 12 of 28
we‡ePbvaxb _vKv Ae¯’vq 1 bs weevw` the Muslim Marriages and Divorces (Registration)
Rules, 1975 Gi wewa 5(3)(K) Gi m¤ú~Y© e¨Z¨q NwU‡q 4 bs weevw`‡K mvgwqKfv‡e wbKvn
†iwR÷ªvi wn‡m‡e wb‡qvM cÖ`vb K‡ib| GB NUbvi ‡cÖwÿ‡Z ev`x nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M GKwU wiU Av‡e`b
`v‡qi K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM †Kvb iæj Rvwi bv K‡i weevw`MY‡K Av‡e`bwU wb®úwË Kivi wb‡`©k cÖ`vb
K‡ib Ges 4 bs weevw`‡K cÖ`Ë ZwK©Z wb‡qvMc‡Îi Kvh©KvwiZv ¯’wMZ K‡ib|
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi D³ wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× Avwcj wefv‡M wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi Kiv nq| Avwcj wefv‡Mi
mvg‡b we‡eP¨ welq wQ‡jv ‡h, nvB‡KvU© wefvM †Kvb iæj Rvwi bv K‡i Ges weevw`‡`i‡K ïbvwbi my‡hvM
cÖ`vb bv K‡i wiU Av‡e`b wb®úwË Kiv AvBb m¤§Z n‡q‡Q wKbv| ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM wm×všÍ †`b
†h, †Kvb wiU ev †`Iqvwb Kvh©wewai aviv 115 Abyhvqx `v‡qiK„Z wiwfkb Av‡e`‡b iæj Rvwi bv K‡i I
Aci cÿ‡K bv ï‡b m¤ú~Y© cÖwZKvi cÖ`vb Kiv A‰ea| gvbbxq Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq-

Time and again this Division disproved summary disposal of a writ

petition or revisional application under section 115 of the Code of
Civil Procedure giving whole relief to the petitioner without
issuing Rule and thus giving no opportunity to the other side of
being heard.
Avcxj wefvM AwfgZ †`b †h, ev`x wbR wcZvi g„Zy¨i ci Zvi ¯’‡j wbKvn †iwR÷ªvi wn‡m‡e ¯’jvwfwl³
nIqvi Rb¨ Av‡e`b K‡ib| wKš` Av‡e`bwU we‡ePbvaxb _vKve¯’vq weevw`MY 4 bs weevw`‡K mvgwqKfv‡e
wbKvn †iwR÷ªvi wn‡m‡e wb‡qvM cÖ`vb K‡ib| †h‡nZz wcwUkbv‡ii Av‡e`bwU A‡cÿgvb wQj, Zvi
Av‡e`bwU AvBbvbyhvqx MÖnY ev LvwiR Ki‡Z n‡e| ‡mUv bv K‡i Ab¨ KvD‡K wbKvn ‡iwR÷ªvi wn‡m‡e
wb‡qvM cÖ`vb Kiv AvB‡bi eZ¨q| D³ ch©‡eÿY cÖ`vb K‡i gnvgvb¨ Avwcj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi
ivq‡K evwZj †Nvlbv K‡ib Ges AvBbvbyhvqx bZzb K‡i wbKvn †iwR÷ªvi wb‡qvM Kivi wb‡`©k cÖ`vb
K‡ib|

8. Barrister Muhammad Jamiruddin Sirkar vs. The State11

mv‡eK w¯úKvi e¨vwi÷vi Rwgi DwÏb miKv‡ii weiæ‡× miKvwi A_© ‡eAvBwbfv‡e Li‡Pi Awf‡hvM Avbv
nq| ‡WcywU w¯úKvi I wPd ûB‡ci wPwKrmv e¨q miKvwi ‡KvlvMvi ‡_‡K Aby‡gv`‡bi Awf‡hvM Kiv nq|
GQvovI miKvwi A‡_© ‡Kbv dvwb©Pvi wPd ûBc ‡diZ w`‡Z bv PvB‡j wZwb Zv gÄyi K‡ib| wPd ûB‡ci
evwo‡Z BDwUwjwU we‡ji bv‡g fyqv e¨q ‡`wL‡q A_© Av`v‡qi Awf‡hvMI I‡V|

ivóªcÿ wb‡e`b K‡ib, w¯úKvi, ‡WcywU w¯úKvi Ges wPd ûB‡ci Rb¨ we‡`‡k wPwKrmv ‡bqvi Rb¨ AvBb
Abyhvqx ‡Kv‡bv eivÏ ‡`qv nqwb| miKvwi ‡KvlvMvi ‡_‡K A_© e¨q Ki‡Z n‡j The Special
Medical Attendant Rules, 1950 ‡gvZv‡eK Aek¨B cÖavbgš¿xi Aby‡gv`b jvM‡e| ïbvwbA‡šÍ
Avwcj wefvM ivq ‡`b †h, mv‡eK w¯úKvi AvBb ‡g‡b A‡_©i Aby‡gv`‡bi Rb¨ cÖavbgš¿xi wbKU
11
Criminal Appeal No. 67-71 of 2019

Page 13 of 28
mvims‡‣c (Summary) cvwV‡qwQ‡jb| ZrKvjxb cÖavbgš¿x mvi-ms‡‣c¸‡jv cÖZ¨vL¨vb bv K‡i The
Parliament Secretariat Act, 1994 Abyhvqx wb®úwËi Rb¨ w¯úKv‡ii wbKU ‡cÖiY K‡ib| hw`
w¯úKv‡ii A_© AvZ¥mv‡Zi ‡Kv‡bv Amr D‡Ïk¨ _vKZ, Zvn‡j wZwb cÖavbgš¿xi wbKU Aby‡gv`‡bi Rb¨
cvVv‡Zb bv| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

Had the appellant any criminal intention to misappropriate the

money, he would not have sent it for the approval of the Prime
Minister who was legally empowered to provide approval of the
said medical bill.

GQvovI w¯úKv‡ii Aby‡gv`bcÖvß ‡Kv‡bv we‡j `y`K cÖkœ ‡Zvjvi GLwZqvi iv‡L wKbv- †m m¤ú‡K© Avcxj
wefvM wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib| Av`vjZ e‡jb, The Parliament Secretariat Act, 1994 Gi 9 I 18
aviv Abyhvqx msm` mwPevj‡qi cÖavb wn‡m‡e w¯úKvi ‡Kv‡bv wej Aby‡gv`b w`‡j Zvi Rb¨ wZwb gnv
wnmve-wbix‣K I wbqš¿‡Ki gva¨‡g ‡Kej msm‡`i wbKU `vqx _vK‡eb| GB msµv‡šÍ `y`K ev Ab¨
‡Kv‡bv KZ©…c‡‣i cÖkœ ‡Zvjvi GLwZqvi ‡bB| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

From the combined reading of section 9 together with Section 18

of the Parliament Secretariat Act 1994, it appears indubitably that
the Parliament Secretariat will be responsible only to the
Parliament through the Comptroller and Auditor General over the
matter of expenditure of the financial allocation in the yearly
budget and nobody else can raise any question as to the use of such
budget.

AÎ gvgjvq w¯úKv‡ii ¶gZv cÖmvwiZ Kivi e¨vcv‡i Av`vjZ GKwU ¸iæZ¡c~Y© ch©‡e‣Y cÖ`vb K‡ib|
AvBb gš¿Yvjq The Special Medical Attendant Rule 1950 ‡Z cÖ`Ë ‣gZve‡j mywcÖg ‡Kv‡U©i
wePvicwZ‡`i we‡`‡k wPwKrmv MÖnY eve` e¨qK…Z A_© Aby‡gv`‡bi GLwZqvi cÖavb wePvicwZi Dci Ac©Y
K‡i| cÖavb wePvicwZ ‡hgb wePvi wefv‡Mi cÖavb, ‡Zgwb gvbbxq w¯úKvi ‡`‡ki AvBb wefv‡Mi cÖavb;
myZivs Zv‡KI GB GLwZqvi ‡`qv DwPZ| Zvn‡j iv‡ó«i wZbwU A‡½i gv‡S ‣gZvi fvimvg¨ I mgZv
wbwðZ n‡e| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

In a fair democratic polity, It is highly expected that the existence

of equal and identical privileges among the constitutional post
bearers of the same status. The speaker being head of the
Legislature is also no exception in enjoying approval of the
medical expenses abroad vis-a-vis other two heads of organs that is
the Executive and Judiciary.

Page 14 of 28
9. Minaz Ahmed vs. Arif Motahar12

weev`xM‡Yi weiæ‡× `yBwU cÖ‡R‡± UvKv AvZ¥mv‡Zi Awf‡hv‡M `ywU gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| Awfhy³
Avwid ‡gvZvnvi I Kwei ‡iRv hy³iv‡R¨i wewfbœ wcÖ›U I B‡jKU«wbK wgwWqvq Dhaka Regency
Hotel and Resort Ltd bv‡g GKwU ‡nv‡U‡j 100 ‡KvwU UvKv Bb‡f÷‡g‡›Ui Rb¨ weÁvcb ‡`q|
hy³iv‡R¨ A¯’vqxfv‡e emevmiZ cÖevmx‡`i ‡_‡K 119 Rb ‡kqvivi eøK cÖwZ 29 j‣ UvKv K‡i Bb‡f÷
K‡i| wKš` ‡nv‡Uj Pvjy nIqvi ci ‡`Lv hvq, Zv‡`i eøK cÖwZ ‡kqv‡ii f¨vjy 29 j‣ ‡_‡K Kwg‡q 17
j¶ UvKv eivÏ ‡`Iqv n‡q‡Q| AZtci wewb‡qvMKvixiv UvKv AvZ¥mv‡Zi gvgjv K‡i|

AciwU‡Z, 2005 mv‡j GKB Awfhy³ e¨vw³iv ivRDK Kg©Pvix Kj¨vY mwgwZi mv‡_ Zv‡`i Rwg I
fe‡bi 7g ‡_‡K 15Zg Zjv µq msµvšÍ GKwU evqbv Pyw³ K‡i| cy‡iv cÖ‡R‡±i cÖK…Z g~j¨ wQj 42.6
‡KvwU UvKv| wKš` Awfhy³ AvmvgxMY 112.5 ‡KvwU g~j¨ ‡`wL‡q wewfbœ wgwWqvq weÁvcb ‡`q|
wewb‡qvMKvixMY cieZ©x‡Z †`L‡Z cvb †h, Awfhy³iv 18 ‡KvwU UvKvi Dc‡i AvZ¥mvr K‡i‡Q|

AÎ gvgjvq XvKvi wPd †g‡Uªvcwjb g¨vwR‡÷ªU Awfhy³ Avmvgx‡`i Rvwgb cÖ`vb K‡i| ms¶yä cÿ
gnvbMi `vqiv R‡Ri Av`vj‡Z Rvwgb evwZ‡ji Av‡e`b K‡ib| `vqiv Av`vjZI Rvwgb envj iv‡Lb|
fy³‡fvMxiv Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958 Gi Section 10(A) avivi Aax‡b
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Av‡e`b K‡ib| nvB‡KvU© wefvM `vqiv R‡Ri Av‡`‡ki ˆeaZv wb‡q iæj Rvwi Ges
Rvwgb Av‡`k ¯’wMZ K‡ib| cvkvcvwk Avmvgx‡`i `yB mßv‡ni g‡a¨ AvZ¥mgc©‡Yi Av‡`k ‡`b|
AvmvgxMY D³ ¯’wMZv‡`k evwZj ‡P‡q Av‡e`b K‡i| ZLb nvB‡KvU© wefvM Zvi c~‡e©i Av‡`k evwZj
K‡ib| GB wm×v‡šÍ ‣yä n‡q fy³‡fvMxiv Avwcj wefv‡M wjf Uz Avcxj `v‡qi K‡ib|

Avcxj wefv‡M g~j we‡eP¨ welq wQj, `y`K e¨ZxZ Ab¨ ‡Kv‡bv ms¯’v KZ©„K `v‡qiK…Z gvgjvq Z`šÍ
PjvKvjxb mg‡q Ges we‡kl RR KZ©„K gvgjvwU Avg‡j ‡bIqvi c~‡e© g¨vwR‡÷ªU Gi Kv‡Q Awfhy³
Avmvgxiv Rvwgb Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cvi‡e wKbv? ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, `y`K
e¨ZxZ Ab¨ ‡Kv‡bv ms¯’v KZ©„K Kiv gvgjvq Z`šÍ PjvKvjxbmg‡q Ges Avg‡j ‡bIqvi c~‡e© Awfhy³
e¨w³MY Rvwgb Av‡e`b Ki‡Z cvi‡e| GQvovI GKRb g¨vwR‡÷«U gvwb jÛvwis cÖwZ‡iva AvBb, 2012
Gi Aax‡b Rvwgb cÖ`v‡bi ‣gZv iv‡Lb| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

Having discussed as above we are of the view that in the cases

initiated by the agency(s)/organization(s) other than the
Commission at the pre-trial stage before taking cognizance by the
Special Judge, the Magistrate concerned is not powerless to
entertain the application for bail of an accused under Money
Laundering Protirodh Ain, 2012.

12
74 DLR (AD) 238

Page 15 of 28
Av`vjZ fy³‡fvMx‡`i Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1958 Gi Section 10(A) avivq
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M `v‡qiK…Z Av‡e`b GLwZqvi ewnf©~Z e‡j ‡NvlYv K‡ib| KviY fy³‡fvMxiv gnvbMi
`vqiv R‡Ri Av‡`‡ki ˆeaZv P¨v‡jà K‡iwQj; we‡kl RR KZ©„K cÖ`Ë †Kvb Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× Zviv
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M Av‡mwb| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

we are constrained to hold that since the order dated 26.09.2021

was passed by the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka in
a Miscellaneous Case, not by a Special Judge appointed under the
Act of 1958, the application under section 10(1A) of the Act of
1958 is not amenable before the High Court Division against said
order.

10. Durnity Daman Commission vs. Md. Ashraful Haque and others13

7 AvM÷ 2011 Zvwi‡L `y`K m¤úwËi wnmve ‡P‡q Avkivdyj nK‡K ‡bvwUk cvVvq Ges Z`šÍKvix
Kg©KZ©vi wbKU nvwRi nIqvi wb‡`©k ‡`q| D³ ‡bvwU‡ki Kvh©aviv‡K P¨v‡jà K‡i Avkivdyj nK
nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M ixU Av‡e`b `v‡qi K‡i| Av‡e`‡b wZwb D‡jøL K‡i ‡h, c~‡e© `y`‡Ki Z`šÍKvix
Kg©KZ©v 2 evi m¤úwËi wnmve ‡P‡q ‡bvwUk cvwV‡qwQ‡jb Ges Zvi mvg‡b Dcw¯’Z n‡Z wb‡`©k
w`‡qwQ‡jb| wZwb `yBeviB ‡bvwU‡ki Rev‡e m¤úwËi wnmve Rgv w`‡qwQ‡jb Ges nvwRi n‡qwQ‡jb|
nvB‡KvU© wefvM Zvi ixU LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| wZwb D³ wm×v‡šÍ ÿzä n‡q Avwcj wefv‡M wjf wcwUkb `v‡qi
K‡ib| ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avwcj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq evwZj K‡i ‡`b| iv‡q Av`vjZ e‡jb, `y`K
‡Kvb e¨w³i m¤úwËi wnmv‡e mš`ó bv n‡j Zvi weiæ‡× gvgjv Ki‡Z cv‡i| wKš` GKRb e¨w³‡K evievi
‡bvwUk cÖ`vb Ki‡Z cv‡i bv| Avcxj wefvM evievi ‡bvwUk cÖ`vbKvix Kg©KZ© v‡`i weiæ‡× AvBbx e¨e¯’v
‡bIqvi Av‡`k cÖ`vb K‡ib|

Avcxj wefv‡Mi iv‡q ms‣yä n‡q `y`K AÎ wiwfD wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡i| `y`‡Ki AvBbRxex Av`vj‡Z
e‡jb ‡h, Z`šÍ KvR cwiPvjbvi Rb¨ evievi ‡bvwUk cÖ`vb K‡i m¤úwËi wnmve Zje Kiv cÖ‡qvRb| Gi
gva¨‡g ‡Kvbfv‡eB nqivwb Kiv nq bv Ges ZvB GLv‡b Kwgk‡bi Amr AwfcÖv‡qi cÖkœB D‡V bv| wZwb
AviI wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb AvBb, `yb©xwZ `gb Kwgkb wewagvjv I ‡dŠR`vwi
Kvh©wewa‡Z evievi ‡bvwUk cvVv‡bvi ‡‣‡Î AvBwb ‡Kvb evav ‡bB| ixU Av‡e`bKvixi c‡‣ wb‡qvwRZ
AvBbRxex Av`vj‡Z e³e¨ iv‡Lb ‡h, ‡bvwU‡ki bv‡g bvMwiK‡K nqivwb Kiv hv‡e bv| ïbvwbA‡šÍ
Av`vjZ wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, ixU Av‡e`bKvix‡K h_vh_ I Kvh©Kix Z`‡šÍi ¯^v‡_© m¤úwËi wnmve
PvIqv n‡q‡Q Ges GLv‡b AvB‡bi ‡Kvb e¨Z¨q N‡Uwb| Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

We have no hesitation to hold that this procedure of inquiry by the

Commission is very fair, transparent and accountable and this
13
Civil Review Petition No.08 of 2020

Page 16 of 28
 procedure is for the benefit of the person(s) against whom an
inquiry is going on. In course of inquiry the concerned person(s) is
getting chance of being heard before the inquiry officer to defend
himself. Similarly, after filing of the case during investigation
period, Rule 11 of the Rules, 2007 provides similar provision for
defending an accused in an investigation process.

Avcxj wefvM Zvi wm×všÍ wiwfD K‡ib Ges wjf wcwUk‡b cÖ`Ë ch©‡e‣Y ev` ‡`b| Z`šÍKvix
Kg©KZ©v‡`i weiæ‡× e¨e¯’v MÖn‡Yi wb‡`©k evwZj K‡i ‡`b|

11. Abdul Gaffar vs. Md. Abdul Miah14

AÎ gvgjvq Avwcj wefvM KLb wigvÛ Av‡`k (‡diZ) cÖ`vb Kiv hv‡e ‡mB cÖm‡½ Av‡jvKcvZ K‡ib|
Avcxj wefvM wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, gvgjvq †Kvb c‡‣i NvUwZ c~i‡Yi myweav‡_© wigvÛ Av‡`k Rvwi
Kiv hv‡e bv| mPivPi (Matter of course) wigvÛ Av‡`k ‡`qv hv‡e bv| Av`vjZ Aek¨B mvÿ¨
cÖgvY we‡ePbv I cÖvmw½KZv K‡i GB ai‡Yi Av‡`k w`‡eb|
AÎ Avcx‡ji weev`x mnKvix R‡Ri Av`vj‡Z ¯^Ë¡ †NvlYv I `Lj D×v‡ii gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| wbgœ
Av`vjZ ev`xi AbyK~‡j ivq ‡`b| iv‡q Amš`ó n‡q weev`xc‣ ‡Rjv R‡Ri Av`vj‡Z Avwcj `v‡qi
K‡ib| †Rjv RR gvgjvwU wb®úwËi Rb¨ hyM¥ ‡Rjv R‡Ri Kv‡Q n¯ÍvšÍi K‡ib| hyM¥ ‡Rjv RR wbgœ
Av`vj‡Zi ivq cÖZ¨vL¨vb K‡ib Ges cybwe©Pv‡ii Rb¨ wbgœ Av`vj‡Z ‡diZ cvVvb| D³ wm×v‡šÍ ÿzä n‡q
ev`xcÿ nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiwfkb †gvKÏgv `v‡qi K‡i| ïbvwbA‡šÍ nvB‡KvU© wefvM hyM¥ †Rjv R‡Ri
wm×všÍ evwZj K‡i †`b| ÿzä n‡q gvgjvi weev`x cÿ Avcxj wefv‡M D³ wm×všÍ P¨v‡jà K‡i|

ev`x c‡‣i weÁ AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡ib ‡h, bvwjkx Rwgi (Suit Land) cÖK…Z gvwjK nvwi PiY
gvjv| wZwb gwbi Dwχbi Kv‡Q D³ Rwg n¯ÍvšÍi K‡ib| d‡j nvwi Pi‡Yi DËivwaKvixiv bvwjkx Rwg
†_‡K Zv‡`i AwaKvi (Interest) nvivb| bvwjkx Rwgi evwK As‡ki gvwjK (Co-Sharer) nj cywjb
P›`ª| wZwb wbR Ask Hk¦‡h©i Kv‡Q n¯ÍvšÍi K‡i| bvwkjx f~wg ‡_‡K ev`x‡K DrLv‡Zi welqwU cybwe©‡ePbvi
Rb¨ gvgjvwU wbgœ Av`vj‡Z ‡diZ cvVv‡bv nq| D”P Av`vjZ ev`xc‣‡K bvwjkx Rwg ‡_‡K DrLv‡Zi
Awf‡hvM mgvavb bv K‡i fyj ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib|
Ab¨w`‡K ev`x c‣ wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, cywjb P›`ª I mykxj P›`ª DËivwaKvi m~ ‡Î bvwkjx Rwgi gvwjKvbv
jvf K‡i| myL‡`e Fwli ga¨¯’Zvq Zviv ev`xc‡‣i wbKU f~wgwU weµq K‡ib| AZtci ev`x c‣
bvgRvwi K‡i kvwšÍc~Y©fv‡e †fvM`Lj KiwQj| Zviv bvwjkx f~wgi Pvicv‡k GKwU mxgvbv †`Iqvj wbg©vY
K‡i| GgZve¯’vq weev`x c‣ D³ Rwg Zv‡`i e‡j `vwe K‡i Ges `Lj n¯ÍvšÍ‡ii Rb¨ ûgwK cÖ`vb K‡i|

14
Civil Appeal No. 81 of 2008

Page 17 of 28
d‡j ev`xc‣ ¯’vqx wb‡lavÁv ‡P‡q gvgjv K‡i| Zvi wKQyw`b c‡i weev`xc‣ Zv‡K f~wg ‡_‡K DrLvZ
K‡i Ges f~wgwU `L‡j ‡bq| d‡j ev`x c‣ AÎ gvgjv `v‡qi K‡i|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ Avcxj wefvM gvgjvwU LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| Av`vjZ iv‡q D‡jøL K‡ib ‡h, †`Iqvwb Kvh©wewai
107 avivi Aaxb Avwcj Av`vjZ AW©vi 41, iæj 23 I 25 G ewY©Z kZ© mv‡c‡‣ wigvÛ Av‡`k cÖ`vb
Ki‡Z cv‡i| wiwfkb †gvKÏgv PjvKv‡jI D”P Av`vjZ cÖvmw½K welqmg~n we‡ePbvq wb‡q wigvÛ Av‡`k
Rvwi Ki‡Z cv‡i| gvgjvi ‡Kvb c‡‣i NvUwZ c~i‡Yi myweav‡_© (to facilitate a party to fill up
the lacuna in his case) ‡Kvb wigvÛ Av‡`k cÖ`vb Kiv hv‡e bv| mPivPi (Matter of course)
wigvÛ Av‡`k †`qv hv‡e bv| h_vh_fv‡e mvÿ¨ cÖgvY cÖvmw½KZv hvPvB K‡iB D³iƒc Av‡`k w`‡Z n‡e|
‡h‡nZy mZ¡ msµvšÍ Ø›Ø wbim‡b AwZwi³ mv‡ÿ¨i cÖ‡qvRb wQj bv †m‡nZz AÎ gvgjvq wigvÛ Av‡`k
cÖ`v‡bi KviY we`¨gvb †bB|
weÁ Av`vjZ Av‡iv e‡jb, gvgjvwU ¯^Ë¡ †NvlYv I `Lj D×v‡ii nIqvq ev`xc‣‡K Aek¨B gvwjKvbv ¯^Z¡
(Chain of title) I `Lj (Mode of Possession) Ges †e`Lj (Alleged dispossession) Gi
ZvwiL I mgq cÖgvY Ki‡Z n‡e| wKš` ev`x c‣ 1977 mvj ch©šÍ Rwgi gvwjKvbvi aviv (Chain of
ownership) cÖgvY Kivi welqwU Gwo‡q hvb| Aciw`‡K, weev`xc‣ Zv‡`i gvwjKvbv ¯^‡Z¡i aviv
wbeÜbK…Z `wjj Øviv cÖgvY K‡iwQj Ges bvwjkx f~wgwUI Zv‡`i `L‡j wQj| AZGe ev`x c‡‣i Rb¨
Avek¨K wQj bvwjkx f~wgwUi Dci Zv‡`i gvwjKvbv¯^Z¡, ‡fvM `Lj I f~wg ‡_‡K DrLvZ mswkøó mKj
NUbvmg~n cÖgvY Kiv| wKš` ev`x c‣ ‡mwU Ki‡Z e¨_© n‡q‡Q| Zv m‡Ë¡I wbgœ Av`vjZ ev`x c‡‣i
AbyK~‡j ivq ‡`q| D”P Av`vjZI AvB‡bi weavb I gvgjvi mvÿ¨ cÖgvY we‡ePbv bv K‡i AvBbMZ fyj
K‡i‡Q| Avcxj wefv‡Mi wm×všÍ Zz‡j aiv njt

As the appellants-defendants produced certified copies of the

registered deed which is almost 40 years older in terms of time of
execution of the respondents-plaintiffs, this long gap cannot be
filled in only by the description in the plaint and that too were not
proved. Accordingly, we find merit in the submissions of the
learned Counsel of the appellants.
The reason elaborated above we find that the impugned Judgement
and orders of the High Court Division calls for interference. In the
result, this Civil Appeal is allowed. The Judgement and order of
the High Court Division is set aside and the suit is dismissed,
however, without any order as to cost.

12. Terab Ali and others vs. Syed Ullah and others15
we`¨gvb wmwfj wcwUkb di wjf Uz Avwc‡ji 1-8 bs weevw` wb¤œ Av`vj‡Z bvwjkx m¤úwˇZ ¯^Z¡ †Nvlbv
I `Lj cybiæ×v‡ii gvgjv `v‡qi K‡ib| weev`x ‡Kvb c`‡ÿc MÖnY bv Kivq 15/04/1989 Bs Zvwi‡L
15
Civil Petition For Leave To Appeal No.3135 of 2014

Page 18 of 28
evw` GKZidv wWwµ cÖvß nb| cieZx©‡Z 21/10/1993 Bs Zvwi‡L evw` D³ wWwµ Rvwii Rb¨ wmwbqi
mnKvix RR Av`vjZ, m`i, wm‡jU Gi Av`vj‡Z gvgjv K‡ib| weevw` D³ gvgjv Lvwi‡Ri cÖv_©bv K‡i
wcwUkb `v‡qi K‡ib| wmwbqi mnKvix RR Av`vjZ, m`i, wm‡jU 11.01.2012 Bs Zvwi‡Li Av‡`‡ki
gva¨‡g D³ wcwUkb LvwiR K‡i ‡`b| wmwbqi mnKvix RR, Av`vjZ cvwK¯Ív‡bi †ckIqvi nvB‡Kv‡U©i
GKwU iv‡qi Dci wfwË K‡i Av‡`k cÖ`vb K‡ib, hv evsjv‡`‡ki ¯^vaxbZvi cieZx© mg‡q ‡NvwlZ
n‡qwQj|

weevw` D³ Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡× †Rjv RR Av`vjZ, wm‡jU I nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiwfkb `v‡qi K‡ib| wKš`
Dc‡iv³ Av`vjZØq wmwbqi mnKvix R‡Ri Av‡`k envj iv‡Lb| Av‡e`bKvix D³ iv‡qi weiæ‡× Avwcj
wefv‡M wjf Uz Avwcj `v‡qi K‡i| Avwcj wefvM gšÍe¨ K‡ib ‡h, Ab¨ †Kvb †`‡ki bRxi msweav‡bi
111 I 149 Aby‡”Q‡`i kZ©c~iY mv‡c‡ÿ Avgv‡`i Awa‡ÿ‡Î cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e| Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq-

In this connection, our considered view is that case laws of any

jurisdiction is applicable in our jurisdiction subject to the
provisions of Article 111 read with Article 149 of the Constitution
of Bangladesh, 1972 only and anything beyond that periphery,
specially from Subordinate Judiciary, could be termed as judicial
adventurism.

fviZ I cvwK¯Ív‡bi bRximg~‡ni cÖ‡hvR¨Zv m¤ú‡K© Avwcj wefvM msweav‡bi Aby‡”Q` 111 I 149 gšÍe¨
K‡ib †h, fvi‡Zi Awa‡ÿ‡Îi 1947 mv‡ji 13 AvM÷ ch©šÍ ‡NvwlZ bRximg~n I cvwK¯Ívb Awa‡ÿ‡Îi
1971 mv‡ji 25 gvP© ch©šÍ †NvwlZ bRximg~n evsjv‡`‡ki Awa‡ÿ‡Î cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e| Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq-

By dint of the above mentioned constitutional provisions the case

laws of the then higher courts namely Dhaka High Court, Federal
Court of Pakistan (14 August 1947 of its independence to 1956);
Supreme Court of Pakistan (1956 to 25 March 1971); Calcutta
High 25 Court, Federal Court of India (1935-1947 13th August)
the Privy Council (till 13th August, 1947) is applicable with
binding effect in our jurisdiction.Õ

AZtci Av`vjZ K‡qKwU bRxi D‡jøLc~e©K AwfgZ cÖKvk K‡ib †h, †`Iqvwb Kvh©wewai aviv 48 (1) I
Zvgvw` AvB‡bi 182 Aby‡”Q` Abyhvqx wWwµ Rvwii Rb¨ wWwµ ‡Nvlbvi 3 eQ‡ii g‡a¨ gvgjv Ki‡Z
n‡e| wKš` †h‡nZz Rvwi gvgjvwU mv‡o 3 eQi ci `v‡qi Kiv n‡qwQj, ZvB Avwcj wefvM nvB‡KvU© wefvM
I Aa¯Íb Av`vj‡Zi ivq evwZj K‡i Rvwi gvgjvwU LvwiR K‡i ‡`b|

Page 19 of 28
13. The State vs. Kabir Biswas and others16
Avcxj wefvM AÎ gvgjvq GKvwaK ‡dŠR`vix wewea gvgjv GK‡Î wb®úwË K‡ib| Av`vjZ wm×všÍ cÖ`vb
K‡ib ‡h, nvB‡KvU© wefvM I Aa¯Íb Av`vjZmg~n AvMvg Rvwgb cÖ`v‡bi ‡‣‡Î State Vs. Professor
Dr. Morshed Hasan Khan17 gvgjvq Avwcj wefvM cÖ`Ë g~jbxwZmg~n ‡g‡b Pj‡Z eva¨| GKB
mv‡_ nvB‡KvU© wefvM‡K bxwZÁvbnxb (Unscrupulous Exercise) AvMvg Rvwgb gÃy‡ii ‣gZv ‡_‡K
weiZ _vKvi wb‡`©k †`b|

cÖ_g gvgjvq Awfhy³ Kwei wek¦v‡mi kqbKÿ n‡Z 220 wcm Bqvev U¨ve‡jU D×vi Kiv nq| NUbv¯’j
‡_‡K cvwj‡q hvIqvq Zv‡K ‡MÖßvi Kiv m¤¢e nqwb| Zvi weiæ‡× gv`K`ªe¨ wbqš¿Y AvBb 2018 Gi
36(1) aviv I 10(K) ‡Uwe‡ji Aax‡b gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| wØZxq gvgjvq Awfhy³ ‡gvmv¤§r we_x
‡eM‡gi kqbM…n n‡Z 100 MÖvg wn‡ivBb D×vi Kiv nq| Zvi weiæ‡× gv`K`«e¨ wbqš¿Y AvBb, 2018 Gi
36(1) aviv, ‡Uwej 8(K), 8(M) I 41 avivi Aax‡b gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| Awfhv‡bi mgq Zv‡K
NUbv¯’‡j cvIqv hvq wb| Z…Zxq gvgjvq AvKivg gwjøK 10 eQi eqmx GKwU wkï †g‡q‡K al©‡Yi
Awf‡hv‡M Awfhy³| D³ Aciv‡ai d‡j wfKwU‡gi ‡Mvcb A‡½ gvivZ¥K RL‡gi m…wó nq| nZ¨vi ûgwK
w`‡q Avmvgx NUbv¯’j Z¨vM K‡i| AZtci Zvi weiæ‡× bvix I wkï wbh©vZb `gb AvBb, 2000 Gi 9(1)
avivi Aax‡b gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq| PZz_© gvgjvwU GKB Avmvgx AvKivg gwjø‡Ki weiæ‡×| GRvnv‡i
D‡jøL Kiv nq †h, Avmvgx wewfbœ mgq Zv‡K †cÖg I A‰ea kvixwiK m¤úK© ¯’vc‡bi cÖ¯Íve †`q| wKš`
GRvnvi Kvix Zv‡Z mvov †`qwb| GK iv‡Z Avmvgx AvKivg gwjøK fy³‡fvMxi `iRvq Av‡m| wb‡Ri ¯^vgx
G‡m‡Q g‡b K‡i `iRv Lyj‡j Avmvgx Zvi Dci Svuwc‡q c‡o Ges Rei ‡Rvic~e©K al©Y K‡i| fy³‡fvMxi
wPrKvi ï‡b Zvi ¯^vgx NUbv¯’‡j ‡cŠuQv‡j Awfhy³ Zvi Zv‡K gvivZ¥K RLg K‡i| AZtci fz³‡fvMxi
¯^vgx gviv hvb| Avmvgxi weiæ‡× bvix wkï wbh©vZb `gb AvBb, 2000 I Zrmn `Ûwewai 302 avivi
Aax‡b gvgjv `v‡qi Kiv nq|

GUwb© ‡Rbv‡ij Avcxj wefv‡Mi wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, nvB‡KvU© wefvM AhvwPZfv‡e I NUbvi ¸iæZ¡
we‡ePbvq MÖnY bv K‡i ivq cÖ`vb K‡i‡Qb| D³ ivqmg~‡n wePvwiK wPšÍv (Judicial Mind) cÖ‡qvM Kiv
nqwb| wZwb Av‡iv e‡jb, 66 DLR(AD) 92 I 71 DLR (AD) 364 G cÖKvwkZ Avcxj wefv‡Mi
ivqmg~n AeÁv K‡i nvB‡KvU© Awfhy³‡`i AvMvg Rvwgb gÃyi K‡i‡Qb| Avmvgx‡`i weiæ‡× mywbw`©ó
Awf‡hv‡Mi welqwU nvB‡KvU© wefvM Avg‡j MÖnY K‡ibwb| nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivq mg~n evwZj K‡i w`‡q
Avcxj wefvM AÎ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib| GKB mv‡_ State vs. Professor Morshed Hasan Khan18
gvgjvq Avwcj wefvM cÖ`Ë 16 wU wb‡`©kbv D‡jøL K‡ib|

16
Criminal Miscellaneous Petitions No.1432-1434 & 1441 of 2022
17
71 DLR (AD) 364
18
ibid

Page 20 of 28
 nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi ivqmg~n

14. Jotindranath Mondal vs. Gouri Dasi19

ivR wenvix gণ্ড‡ji `yB mšÍvb hZx›`ªbv_ gণ্ডj (ev`x) I Awfgb¨ gণ্ডj| wcZvi RxeÏkvq Awfgb¨
gণ্ডj ci‡jvK Mgb K‡ib| g„Zz¨Kv‡j Zvui ¯¿x †MŠix `vmx (1 bs weev`x) I `yB Kb¨v eZ©gvb wQ‡jb|
ivRwenvixi g„Zz¨i ci Zvui GKgvÎ RxweZ mšÍvb ev`x h_x›`ªbv_ gণ্ডj Zvui mg¯Í m¤úwËi DËivaxKvi
wn‡m‡e †fvM`Lj Ki‡Z _v‡Kb| cieZx©‡Z 1 bs weev`x ivR wenvix gÛ‡ji †i‡L hvIqv 5.95 GKi
m¤úwË wb‡Ri bv‡g bvgRvwi K‡i †bq| G‡Z msÿzä n‡q ev`x D³ ¯^Z¡ †NvlYvi ‡gvKÏgv `v‡qi
K‡ib| ev`x `vex‡Z D‡jøL K‡ib, †h‡nZz 1 নং weev`xi ¯^vgx †Kvb cyÎ mšÍvb Qvov g„Zz¨eiY K‡i‡Q
†m‡nZz 1 bs weev`x ivR wenvix gণ্ড‡ji †i‡L hvIqv †Kvb K…wl m¤úwËi AvBbvbyM AwaKvix bq|
myZivs 1 bs weev`xi bv‡g bvgRvixwU A‰ea| 1 bs weev`x Zvui wjwLZ e³‡e¨ `vex K‡i e‡jb, The
Hindu Women‟s Rights to Property Act,1937 Gi 3 aviv Abyhvqx wZwb D³ we‡ivaxq
m¤úwˇZ Zvui g„Z ¯^vgxi স্থলাভিভিক্ত (being stepping in the shoes of her deceased
husband) wn‡m‡e AvBbvbyM DËivwaKvix|

Dfqcÿ‡K ïbvbxA‡šÍ wePvwiK Av`vjZ Avbylvw½K cÖwZKvi (Consequential Relief) Ges †KvU©
wd cwi‡kva bv Kivi Kvi‡Y †gvKÏgvwU LvwiR K‡ib| hw`I iv‡qi ch©‡eÿ‡Y Av`vjZ e‡jb, 1 bs
weev`x D‡jøwLZ we‡ivaxq K…wl m¤úwËi AvBbvbyM AwaKvix bq| ev`x D³ LvwiR Av‡`‡ki weiæ‡×
Avcxj `v‡qi Ki‡j Avcxj Av`vjZI Avcxj LvwiR K‡ib| Z‡e Avcxj Av`vjZ wePvwiK
Av`vj‡Zi ch©‡eÿY cwieZ©b K‡i e‡jb, 1 bs weev`x we‡ivaxq K…wl m¤úwËi AvBbvbyM
DËivwaKvix| ev`x Avcxj Av`vj‡Zi iv‡q msÿzä n‡q nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiwfkb `v‡qi K‡ib|
D³ wiwfkb wb®úwˇZ Av`vj‡Zi mvg‡b `ywU AvBwb cÖkœ DÐvwcZ nq; 1) cÖ_g weev`x ¯^vgxi
স্থলাভিভিক্ত wn‡m‡e k^ï‡ii D‡jøwLZ we‡ivaxq K…wl m¤úwËi AvBbvbyM DËivwaKvix n‡eb wK bv?
Ges 2) weev`x KZ…©K Avcxj `v‡qi ev `vex DÐvcb bv Ki‡j Avcxj Av`vjZ wePvwiK Av`vj‡Zi
ch©‡eÿY cwieZ©b Ki‡Z cv‡র wKbv?

DÐvwcZ AvBwb cÖkœ wb®úwˇZ Av`vjZ GKRb Amicus Curie wb‡qvM cÖ`vb K‡ib| Av`vjZ
Dfq c‡ÿi hy³ZK©, Amicus Curie Gi gZvgZ Ges Dc¯’vwcZ bwRimg~n ch©v‡jvPbvc~e©K ivq
cÖ`vb K‡ib| iv‡q Av`vjZ cÖ_g AvBwb cÖ‡kœ wb¤œwjwLZ gZvgZ cÖ`vb K‡ib-

1 bs weev`x Zvui k^ï‡ii m¤úwˇZ g„Z mšÍv‡bi স্থলাভিভিক্ত wn‡m‡e c~Y© DËivভিকাix n‡eb|
এক্ষে‡Î K…wl m¤úwË I wf‡U m¤úwË Avjv`vfv‡e we‡ePbvi my‡hvM ‡bB| Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq;

19
27 BLC 01

Page 21 of 28
 A Hindu Widow is entitled to inherit the property left by her
deceased husband, and even widow of a predeceased son of the
deceased is also entitled to inherit the property left by him as his
son.

DÐvwcZ wØZxq cÖ‡kœi উত্তক্ষর Av`vjZ gZvgZ cÖ`vb K‡i e‡jb, Avcxj Av`vjZ AvBwb I
NUbvMZ ‡h‡Kvb cÖkœ wbav©iY Ki‡Z cv‡ib hv weev`x KZ©„K Avcxj `v‡qi ev AvcwË `v‡q‡ii mv‡_
m¤ú„³ bq| Av`vj‡Zi fvlvq-
“The appellate court can decide any question of law and fact
even in absence of cross objection or appeal by the defendant.”

15. Mizanur Rahman and others vs. Bangladesh and others20

nvB‡KvU© wefvM AÎ iv‡q 4wU wiU †gvKÏgv GK‡Î wb®úwË K‡ib| 4 Rb ev`x gsjv †cŠimfvi wewfbœ
c‡` Kg©iZ wQ‡jb| Zv‡`i‡K PvKzwiPy¨Z Kiv n‡j Zviv AÎ wiU †gvKÏgv¸‡jv `v‡qi K‡ib| 1 bs ev`x
†cŠimfvi wUKv`vi wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQ‡jb| Zvi weiæ‡× Kg©‡ÿ‡Î Abycw¯’Z _vKv, `yb©xwZi gva¨‡g miKvix
Pvj MÖnYmn KwZcq Awf‡hvM D‡V| Awf‡hv‡Mi †cÖwÿ‡Z KviY Zv‡K `k©v‡bv e¨wZ‡i‡K PvKzwiPy¨Z Kiv
nq| 2 bs ev`x gsjv †cŠimfvi B‡jKwUªwkqvb c‡` Kg©iZ wQ‡jb| wbqwgZ `vwqZ¡ cvjb KivKv‡j wZwb
fvZv e„w×i Av‡e`b K‡ib Ges cieZ©x‡Z †`L‡Z cvb nvwRiv LvZvq Zvi mvÿi gy‡Q †djv n‡q‡Q|
AZtci wZwb KZ©„cÿ eivei Av‡e`b Ki‡j Zv‡K ewn¯‹vi K‡i GKwU Awdm Av‡`k Bmy¨ Kiv nq| 3 bs
ev`x D³ †cŠimfvi K¬vK© wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQ‡jb| gvZ…Z¡Kvjxb QzwU‡Z _vKvKv‡j wZwb ewn¯‹vi Av‡`k
cvb| 4 bs ev`x †cŠimfvi UªvK WªvBfvi wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQ‡jb| Zvi weiæ‡× Gw•‡W›U, QzwUwenxb
MinvwRimn K‡qKwU Awf‡hvM wQj| Zv‡K †Kvb ai‡Yi †bvwUk e¨wZ‡i‡K PvKzwiPz¨Z Kiv nq|

ev`xc‡ÿi AvBbRxex wb‡e`b K‡ib †h, ‡bvwUk cÖ`vb e¨wZ‡i‡K Zv‡`i‡K PvKzwiPz¨Z Kivq PvKzwi
bxwZgvjvi iæj 44 I Natural Justice Gi bxwZ jw․NZ n‡q‡Q| KviY, KZ©©„cÿ †Kvb Awf‡hvM Avb‡j
‡mUv cÖgvY mv‡c‡ÿ e¨e¯’v MÖnY Ki‡Z n‡e| GQvov, PvKzwi bxwZgvjv Abymv‡i Avcxj Kivi weavb ZLbB
Kvh©Ki n‡e hLb AvBbvbymv‡i PvKzwiPy¨Z Kiv nq| ‡ZgbwU AÎ wiU ev`x‡`i †ÿ‡Î Kiv nqwb| Av`vjZ
Zuvi D³ mvewgkb MÖnY K‡ib| ivóªc‡ÿ wb‡e`b Kiv nq †h, †cŠimfv mvwf©m iæjm Abymv‡i †Kvb
ai‡bi †bvwUk e¨wZ‡i‡K PvKzwiPz¨Z Kivi weavb i‡q‡Q| Av`vjZ AÎ wb‡e`b MÖnY K‡ibwb| wb‡¤œ
Av`vj‡Zi wm×všÍ Zz‡j aiv njt

...The respondents totally ignored to follow the procedure as

enumerated in Chaper-7 of the Service Rules, 1992 as such, we are
of the view that termination simplicity have become a „termination
of stigma‟ as no procedure was followed in these removal orders.
20
27 BLC 798

Page 22 of 28
 Petitioners may come up with a writ petition by passing the
statutory alternative remedy, if the impugned action of the
authority is without jurisdiction in the sense of not being
authorized by the statute or in violation of consitutitonal provision
under such circumstances; a writ petition is maintainble without
exhausting the statutory remedy on the ground of malafide.

16. Shahidulla (Md) vs. Election Commission21

AÎ iv‡q Rvgvjcyi m`i Dc‡Rjvi ZyjwmiPi BDwbqb cwil‡`i wbe©vPb msµvšÍ `ywU wiU wcwUkb GK‡Î
wb®úwË Kiv nq| wbe©vPb Kwgkb wbe©vPb evwZj Ki‡j Av‡e`bKvix AÎ wiU †gvKÏgv `v‡qi K‡ib|
Av‡e`bKvix wbe©vPb evwZj I Z`‡šÍi wb‡`©k GLwZqvi ewnf©~Z †NvlYv Ges ‡M‡RU weÁwßi gva¨‡g
wbe©vP‡bi djvdj AvbyôvwbKfv‡e ‡NvlYvi Av‡`k cÖv_©bv K‡ib|

wiU ïbvwb‡Z Av`vjZ c~‡e©i wm×všÍ, BDwc wbe©vPb msµvšÍ cyivZb I we`¨gvb AvBbmg~n ch©v‡jvPbv
K‡ib| ïbvwbA‡šÍ Av`vjZ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib †h, Local Government (Union Parishads)
Ordinance, 1983 Ges The Union Parishads (Election) Rules, 1983 ‡Z B‡jKkb
Kwgkb‡K wbe©vPb evwZ‡ji e¨vcv‡i e¨vcK ‣gZv ‡`qv n‡qwQj| wKš` ¯’vbxq miKvi (BDwbqb cwil`)
AvBb, 2009 Ges ¯’vbxq miKvi (BDwbqb cwil`) wbe©vPbx bxwZgvjv, 2010 Abyhvqx wbe©vPb evwZ‡ji
e¨vcv‡i B‡jKkb Kwgk‡bi ‣gZv‡K mxgve× Kiv n‡q‡Q| we`¨gvb AvB‡b ejv n‡q‡Q †h, e¨vjU ev·
msµvšÍ ‡h‡Kv‡bv Awbqg n‡jB wbe©vPb ¯’wMZ Kiv hv‡e bv, eis G e¨vcv‡i wbwðZ n‡Z n‡e ‡h ÔGB
cwigvY n¯Í‡‣c n‡q‡Q ‡h, ‡mB ‡fvU‡K‡›`ªi ‡fv‡Ui djvdj wba©viY Kiv hv‡e bv|Õ wKš` c~‡e©i AvB‡b
‡Kv‡bv Awbqg n‡jB cybivq wbe©vPb ‡`qvi GLwZqvi B‡jKkb Kwgk‡bi wQj| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨
Zz‡j aiv njt

The power of the EC under the old rule 70 was plenary in that no
specific circumstances were envisaged under the old rules, but the
situation is different under the new legal regime. From that point
of view the plenary power to cancel election result and directing
re-poll under the new rules is more specific and hence more
defined.

B‡jKkb Kwgkb KZ©„K wbe©vPb evwZ‡ji wm×všÍ‡K Av`vjZ A‰ea ‡NvlYv K‡i| KviY, wbe©vPb evwZ‡ji
‡NvlYv wbe©vP‡bi djvdj ‡NvlYvi ci ‡`qv n‡qwQj| bZyb AvB‡b ‡fvU MÖnY ‡kl nIqvi ci wbe©vPb
¯’wMZ Kivi GLwZqvi wbe©vPb Kwgkb‡K ‡`qv nqwb| wØZxqZ, ‡h Z`šÍ cÖwZ‡e`‡bi wfwˇZ D³ ‡NvlYv

21
27 BLC 718

Page 23 of 28
‡`qv nq, ‡m¸‡jv weZwK©Z Z_¨ m¤^wjZ| weZwK©Z Z‡_¨i wfwˇZ wm×všÍ ‡`qvi GLwZqvi GKgvÎ
wbe©vPb U«vBeybv‡ji| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

The disputes are essentially matters to be decided by the Election

Tribunal exercising judicial authority, not by the EC in exercise of
its plenary and supervisory authority which is administrative in
nature.... Under section 22(1) of the Ain, 2009 read with Rule
53(1) of the Rules, 2010, a candidate can raise question or
objection in the matter before the election Tribunal by presenting
election petition.

nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi G iv‡q Av`vjZ B‡jKkb Kwgkb‡K AvBb Øviv wba©vwiZ mywbw`©ó MwÛi evB‡i hvIqvi
e¨vcv‡i mZK© K‡ib|

17. Manik (Md) vs. State and another22

AÎ gvgjvq ev`xi KvQ ‡_‡K Avmvgxc‣ `yBev‡i 9 j‣ UvKv avi K‡i| UvKv cwi‡kv‡ai Rb¨
Avmvgxc‣ `yBwU ‡PK Bmy¨ K‡i| wKš` e¨vsK Dfq ‡PKB †diZ cÖ`vb K‡i| AZtci ev`xc¶
Negotiable instruments Act 1881 Gi aviv 138(2) Abymv‡i wjM¨vj ‡bvwUk ‡cÖiY K‡i|
Avmvgxc‣ UvKv cwi‡kv‡a e¨_© n‡j ev`xc‣ Av`vj‡Z gvgjv K‡i| mvÿ¨cÖgvY ch©v‡jvPbv K‡i wePvwiK
Av`vjZ Avmvgxc‣‡K Lvjvm ‡`b| D³ wm×v‡šÍ ÿzä n‡q ev`x cÿ nvB‡KvU© wefv‡M wiwfkb Av‡e`b
`v‡qi K‡i|

nvB‡KvU© wefvM 2 wU wel‡q Av‡jvKcvZ K‡ib| cÖ_gZ, Avmvgxc‡‣i DÐvwcZ `vwe Abyhvqx wePvwiK
Av`vj‡Zi wm×v‡šÍi weiæ‡× 60 w`‡bi g‡a¨B Avwcj Av‡e`b Ki‡Z n‡e| wKš` GLv‡b 60 w`‡bi c‡i
AÎ Av‡e`b `v‡qi Kiv n‡q‡Q| myZivs GwU AvBbZ iÿYxq (Maintainable) bq| Av`vjZ AÎ
wb‡e`b MÖnY K‡ibwb| †Kbbv, 60 w`b cvi nIqvq Avcxj `v‡qi Kiv m¤¢e bq| ‡h Kvi‡Y †dŠR`vix
Kvh©wewai 435 I 439 bs avivbymv‡i wiwfkb Av‡e`b `v‡qi Kiv n‡q‡Q| ZvQvov mv‣x‡`i AvBwb cÖgvY
Ges ¯^v‣inxb ‡bvwU‡ki cÖkœ RwoZ _vKvq wiwfkb Av‡e`bB AwaKZi hyw³hy³| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨
Zz‡j aiv njt

If the limitation of filing appeal was not expired, then the revision
would have been more applicable because the question of legal
evidence of the witnesses and the unsigned notices is involved in
the case, not error of law.

22
27 BLC 747

Page 24 of 28
wØZxqZ, ev`xc‣ ‡cÖwiZ wjM¨vj ‡bvwUkwU wQj ¯^v‣inxb| GwU Avmvgxc‣‡K Lvjvm ‡`qvi Ab¨Zg
KviY| wKš` D”P Av`vjZ GwU‡K bvggvÎ Awbqg (Mere irregularity) wn‡m‡e we‡ePbv K‡ib Ges G
Kvi‡Y wjM¨vj ‡bvwU‡ki Kvh©KvwiZv ‡jvc cv‡e bv| eis ‡`L‡Z n‡e h_vmg‡q (30 w`‡b) ‡iwRw÷«K…Z
Wv‡K I h_vh_ wVKvbvq wjM¨vj ‡bvwUk ‡cÖiY Kiv n‡q‡Q wKbv Ges mswkøó ‡PK e¨vsK ‡_‡K ‡diZ
Avmvi e¨vcv‡i we¯ÍvwiZ Z_¨ ‡bvwU‡k AšÍf©y³ Kiv n‡q‡Q wKbv| wb‡¤œ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zz‡j aiv njt

Non-signing the legal notice is an irregularity. It does not create

any cause to the accused to be prejudiced. It is only to be seen,
whether by this mistake of non- signing the legal notice was sent
within the time by a registered post with acknowledgement to the
proper address of the recipient and particulars of the cheque in
question were described regarding the return of the cheque as
unpaid from the bank as described in section 138(1)(b) of the Act.

18. Accom Travels and Tours Limited vs. Oman Air23

Av‡jvP¨ gvgjvq ev`xc‣, Igvb Gqvi ‡_‡K 78 ‡KvwU UvKv ‣wZc~iY ‡P‡q hyM¥ ‡Rjv RR Av`vj‡Z A_©
‡gvKÏgv (Money Suit) `v‡qi K‡ib| ev`xc‣ evsjv‡`‡ki GKwU Ab¨Zg Gwf‡qkb ‡Kv¤úvwb Ges
Uªv‡fj G‡RwÝ| evsjv‡`‡ki gv‡K©‡U ¯’vqx‡Z¡i Rb¨ AvMZ Igvb Gqvi A¨vKg Uªv‡fj‡mi mv‡_ Pyw³e×
nq| wKš` `yBc‡‣i g‡a¨ weev` ‡`Lv ‡`qvq Igvb Gqvi Pyw³ evwZj K‡i| AZtci ‣wZc~iY ‡P‡q
ev`xc‣ Av`vj‡Z gvgjv K‡i|
mv¤úªwZK we‡k¦i Ab¨vb¨ evwYwR¨K Pyw³i g‡Zv G Pyw³‡ZI Avwe©‡U«k‡bi weavb wQj| Pyw³ Abyhvqx ‡Kv‡bv
we‡iva ‡`Lv w`‡j Zv International Chamber of Commerce Gi gva¨‡g wb®úwË n‡e| AviI
ejv nq, AÎ Pyw³ m¤úwK©Z wePviKv‡h©i GLwZqvi ïay Igvb Av`vj‡Zi| GmKj welq we‡ePbvq wb‡q
wbgœ Av`vjZ Avwe©‡U«kb AvBb, 2001 Gi 7 I 10 aviv Abyhvqx Ges ‡`Iqvwb Kvh©wewai 151 aviv
Abyhvqx gvgjv i¶Yxq (Maintainable) bq e‡j LvwiR K‡i ‡`q| wKš` D³ AvB‡bi 3(1) I 3(2)
aviv Abyhvqx, ‡h mKj Pyw³i mvwj‡ki ¯’vb evsjv‡`‡k bq ‡m mKj Pyw³i ‡‣‡Î D³ AvBb c«‡hvR¨ bq|
ZvB wbgœ Av`vj‡Zi iv‡qi ‡hŠw³KZv wb‡q nvB‡KvU© wefv‡Mi mvg‡b cÖkœ D‡V|
ïbvwbA‡šÍ nvB‡KvU© wefvM GB g‡g© ivq ‡`b ‡h, Avwe©‡U«kb AvBb, 2001 Gi 3(1) Ges 3(2) Abymv‡i
aviv 45, 46 I 47 e¨ZxZ D³ AvB‡bi ‡Kv‡bv aviv we‡`kx mvwj‡ki ‡‣‡Î cÖ‡hvR¨ n‡e bv| Z‡e
we‡`wk mvwjwk wm×všÍ ev¯Íevq‡bi ¯Í‡i 7K avivi Aax‡b ‡Kv‡U©i AšÍe©Z©xKvjxb c`‡‣c ‡bqvi ‣gZv
cÖ‡qvM Kiv hv‡e| wbgœ Av`vjZ AÎ gvgjv LvwiR Kivi gva¨‡g AvBb ewnf©yZ wm×všÍ wb‡q‡Q| AÎ
gvgjvq Av‡jvP¨ aviv¸‡jv cÖ‡hvR¨ bv n‡jI wePvwiK Av`vjZ KZ©…K ‡`Iqvwb Kvh©wewa cÖ`Ë mnRvZ

23
27 BLC 596

Page 25 of 28
‣gZv Øviv gvgjvi Kvh©µg ¯’wMZ K‡i we‡iv‡ai welqwU Pyw³ Øviv wba©vwiZ mvwj‡k mgvav‡bi Rb¨
cvVv‡bv ‡hŠw³K wQj| wb‡gœ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zy‡j aiv njt

In view of the provisions under Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the

Arbitration Act 2001, the provisions of the said Act, except the
provisions under Sections 45, 46 and 47, are not applicable in
respect of a arbitration where the seat of such arbitration is in a
foreign country...Therefore, the Court below committed gross
illegality in dismissing the money suit....In spite of such non-
applicability of the said provisions in the suit concerned, the Court
below should have stayed the further proceedings of the said suit
in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 of the Code of
Civil Procedure, 1908 for sending the matter in dispute to resolve
the same through arbitration as agreed by the parties.

19. Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh vs. Bangladesh24

Av‡e`bKvix miKvwi PvKyix AvBb, 2018 Gi 41(1) bs Aby‡”Q` evwZj ‡P‡q wiU `v‡qi K‡i| weZwK©Z
Aby‡”Q‡` Ò‡Kv‡bv miKvwi Kg©Pvixi `vwqZ¡ cvj‡bi mwnZ m¤úwK©Z Awf‡hv‡M `v‡qiK…Z ‡dŠR`vwi
gvgjvq Av`vjZ KZ©…K Awf‡hvMcÎ M…nxZ nBevi c~‡e©, Zvnv‡K ‡MÖdZvi Kwi‡Z nB‡j, miKvi ev
wb‡qvMKvix KZ©…c‡‣i c~e©vbygwZ MÖnY Kwi‡Z nB‡eÓ g‡g© weavb i‡q‡Q| D³ Aby‡”Q` msweav‡bi 26,
27 I 31 Aby‡”Q`‡K j․Nb K‡i wKbv g‡g© nvB‡KU© wefvM Av‡jvKcvZ K‡ib|

ïbvwbA‡šÍ weÁ Av`vjZ ivq cÖ`vb K‡ib ‡h, weZwK©Z Aby‡”Q‡`i gva¨‡g miKvwi PvKywiRxex‡`i
Kg©Kvjxb mg‡q Awfhy³ ‡dŠR`vwi gvgjvi ‡‣‡Î Ah_v nqivwb ‡_‡K wKQyUv myi‣v ‡`Iqv n‡q‡Q| wKš`
eZ©gvb ‡dŠR`vwi wePvie¨e¯’vq ‡KD cognizable offence G Awfhy³ n‡j cywjk Iqv‡i›U QvovB
Zv‡K AvUK Ki‡Z cv‡i| G‡‣‡Î miKvwi Kg©KZ©v‡`i AwZwi³ myweav ‡`IqvUv msweav‡bi 27 Ges 31
Aby‡”Q‡`i g~j w¯úwiU j․Nb K‡i| wb‡gœ Av`vj‡Zi fvl¨ Zy‡j aiv njt

We get an impression that by way of impugned legislature, the

government officials have been given certain protection while
discharging their official duties from undue harassment in criminal
prosecution but in our existing Administration of Criminal Justice,
police have been empowered to arrest an accused without warrant
if the accused commits cognizable offence, so incorporation of
section 41(1) in miKvwi PvKwi AvBb, 2018 on the face of it is flagrant

24
Writ Petition No. 10928 of 2019

Page 26 of 28
 violation of Article 27 and 31 of our Constitution not to speak
inconsistent thereof.

GB msµv‡šÍ Av`vjZ c~‡e©i GKwU wiU gvgjv (Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh vs.
Honourable Speaker25) bwRi wn‡m‡e MÖnY K‡ib| ‡hLv‡b Anti-Corruption Commission
(Amendment) Act, 2013 Gi 32(K) Aby‡”Q‡` `yb©xwZi `v‡q Awfhy³ miKvwi Kg©KZ©v‡`i‡K
AwZwi³ myweav cÖ`v‡bi ‰eaZv‡K P¨v‡jà Kiv nq| Av`vjZ D³ gvgjvq weZwK©Z Aby‡”Q` msweavb
j․Nb K‡i g‡g© wm×všÍ cÖ`vb K‡i| cwi‡k‡l Av`vjZ miKvwi PvKyix AvBb, 2018 Gi 41(1)
Aby‡”Q`‡K evwZj ‡NvlYv K‡ib| D‡jøL¨ †h, eZ©gv‡b Avcxj wefv‡Mi Av‡`‡k D³ iv‡qi Kvh©KvwiZv
¯’wMZ Av‡Q|

jÕ j¨ve

‡gvnv¤§` wkwki gwbi ‡gvnv¤§` mvÏvg †nv‡mb ‡gvnv¤§` wgRvbyj nK

GjGjwe(Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe(Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨vW‡fv‡KU
evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †KvU©| evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †KvU©| XvKv RR †KvU©
‡nW Ae †P¤^vim, jÕ j¨ve| wmwbqi G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve| G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕ j¨ve|

‡gvnv¤§` Avãyj Iqv`y` Ave`yjøvn mvw`K kvBLyj Bmjvg Bgivb

GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq| XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
A¨vW‡fv‡KU A¨vW‡fv‡KU wimvm© G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕj¨ve|
evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †KvU©| evsjv‡`k mywcÖg †KvU©|
G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕj¨ve| G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕj¨ve|

hv‡q` web AvgRv`

GjGjwe (Abvm©) I GjGjGg
XvKv wek¦we`¨vjq|
wimvm© G‡mvwm‡qU, jÕj¨ve|

25

67 DLR 2015 191

Page 27 of 28