Revised QAME Analysis Form 1: ANALYSIS OF THE MONITORING/EVALUATION RESULTS

(to be accomplished by Individual Monitors)

Title of the Training Program: 5 - DAY SCHOOL-BASED LAC SESSION ON LITERACY INSTRUCTION at MAHAGNA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
Inclusive Dates: October 6-10, 2022
Learning Service Provider (Division/HEI): MAHAGNA ES Class Section: ______________Venue: MHAGNA ES
Proponent: NOEL C. NICART Name of Monitor: Lea A. Robin, EdD Date Monitored: __________________________

PART I: Analysis of the Session and Facilitation Evaluation

Based on the results of the evaluation of the session and facilitation done by the participants, as well as the validated observations of the On-Site monitors,
answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the session? Of the facilitator? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
SESSION TITLE Strong Points Factors that helped Areas for Factors that may Recommended Steps
(This may be done Improvement have contributed to to Address the
through a Focus-Group the areas for Issue/s. (Indicate
Discussion) improvement whether action can
(This may be done be immediate or
through a Focus- long-term)
Group Discussion)
Session 1: RPMS Overview Full participation of the Slide decks Provision of ICT LAC Session
Average Rating: 90% participants presentation Technical assistance
Smooth flow of
Faci/RP: Lea A. Robim activities
Average Rating: 92%
Session 2: RPMS Phase 1 & Mastery of the activities Simple and Side decks Assistance of the ICT LAC session for ICT
RPMS Phase 2 presented understandable presentation Coordinator
Average Rating: 93% examples were used
Faci/RP: Jane C. Betonio
Average Rating: 94%
Session 3: RPMS Phase 3 & Smooth flow of Full participation More comprehensive Use of varied LAC session
RPMS Phase 4 activities examples activities

Average Rating: 92%

Faci/RP: ENRICO M.
CODILLA
Average Rating: 92%
Session 4: RPMS Portfolio Clear and Previous knowledge Gender Analysis tools Strict compliance and LAC session
Preparation Comprehensive about and activity implementation

FM-SGO-HRD-006 Rev. 00 Adopted from NEAP QAME Form Analysis 1 with Modifications
 Average Rating: 93% explanation implementation

Faci/RP: MARYJANE L.
TILAR
Average Rating: 92%
Session 5: workshop and Open Full participation of the Slide decks Provision of ICT LAC Session
Forum participants presentation Technical assistance
Smooth flow of
Faci/RP: MARICAR E. activities
PINTOCAN
Average Rating: 94%

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:
Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR form) Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the Deviation

None so far

PART II: Analysis of the Daily Operations of the Program / Training Management
Based on the results of the evaluation of the daily operations, answer the following questions:
1. What are the strong points of the daily operations of the training program? Identify the factors that helped in these areas, if possible.
DAY Overall Rating Strong Points Areas for Improvement and Suggestions
1 92% Strong and worth emulation of activities and discussion LAC session for research

2 90% Well-rounded activity plan LAC session for enhancement

3 89% Well-rounded delivery of the sessions LAC session for improvement

AVER
AGE
RATI
NG
FOR
OPER
ATIO
NS

2. Are there critical incidents that are not captured by the evaluation tool? Describe these incidents in the table below:

FM-SGO-HRD-006 Rev. 00 Adopted from NEAP QAME Form Analysis 1 with Modifications
 Critical Incident (Refer to the STAR Identify deviation from Standard/s Proposed Course/s of Action to Address the
form) Deviation
IMPORTANT: Parts I and II should be used for Debriefing as Feedback to the Program Management Team for information and immediate action

PART III: ANALYSIS OF THE PROGRAM EVALUATION (to be accomplished at the end of the training program)
Identify Class Section/s and Program Attainment Delivery of Provision of Program Training Meals
batches Managemen of Objectives Content Support Manageme Venue Average
t Materials nt Team
MAHAGNA ES TEACHERS 92 93 90 89 95 91 95 92%

General Average
Top three (3) responses based on participant feedback:
SIGNIFICANT LEARNING

How to prepare and organize RPMS Portfolio

FURTHER LEARNING

Enhance previous knowledge

COMMENTS/SUGGESTIONS FOR PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT

More comprehensive presentation

Submitted by: Submitted to / Received by

NOEL C. NICART
School Head LEAA. ROBIN, EdD
PSDS

FM-SGO-HRD-006 Rev. 00 Adopted from NEAP QAME Form Analysis 1 with Modifications