The document summarizes discussions and votes from the NCCN Guidelines panel on head and neck cancers. Key points include:
1) The panel supported including concurrent chemoradiation as an option for selected patients with T4a oral cancer who decline surgery.
2) Treatment recommendations for nasopharynx cancer were further separated by clinical stage, and induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation was recommended for stages T3-4, N1-3, M0 or any T, N2-3, M0.
3) Gemcitabine/cisplatin was clarified as a category 1 recommendation for EBV-associated nasopharynx cancer and category 2A for non-
The document summarizes discussions and votes from the NCCN Guidelines panel on head and neck cancers. Key points include:
1) The panel supported including concurrent chemoradiation as an option for selected patients with T4a oral cancer who decline surgery.
2) Treatment recommendations for nasopharynx cancer were further separated by clinical stage, and induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation was recommended for stages T3-4, N1-3, M0 or any T, N2-3, M0.
3) Gemcitabine/cisplatin was clarified as a category 1 recommendation for EBV-associated nasopharynx cancer and category 2A for non-
The document summarizes discussions and votes from the NCCN Guidelines panel on head and neck cancers. Key points include:
1) The panel supported including concurrent chemoradiation as an option for selected patients with T4a oral cancer who decline surgery.
2) Treatment recommendations for nasopharynx cancer were further separated by clinical stage, and induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiation was recommended for stages T3-4, N1-3, M0 or any T, N2-3, M0.
3) Gemcitabine/cisplatin was clarified as a category 1 recommendation for EBV-associated nasopharynx cancer and category 2A for non-
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT OR-3 Based on the discussion, the panel consensus supported 21 0 0 10 Internal request: including concurrent systemic therapy/RT as an option for those selected patients with stage T4a oral cancer who Comment to consider including concurrent decline surgery. systemic therapy/RT as an option for selected patients with stage T4a oral cancer who decline surgery.
NASO-2/NASO-3 Based on the discussion, the panel consensus supported
Internal request: the following primary treatment options for nasopharynx cancer, by stage: Comment to consider further separating • T2, N0, M0: treatment recommendations for nasopharynx o Definitive RT o Definitive RT + concurrent systemic therapy if 18 2 1 10 cancer by the following clinical stages: high-risk features (bulky tumor volume, high 20 0 1 10 • T2, N0, M0 serum EBV DNA copy number) • T1-2, N1, M0 or T3, N0, M0 • T3-4, N1-3, M0 or Any T, N2, M0 • T1–2,N1,M0 or T3,N0: • T1-4, N0-3, M1 o Concurrent systemic therapy/RT 19 1 1 10 o Consider induction chemotherapy if high-risk features (bulky tumor volume, high serum EBV 18 1 2 10 DNA copy number) o Consider adjuvant chemotherapy if high-risk 20 0 1 10 features (bulky tumor volume, high serum EBV DNA copy number)
• T3-4,N1-3,M0 or any T,N2-3,M0:
o Induction chemotherapy followed by systemic 19 0 2 10 therapy/RT This is a category 1, preferred 15 1 5 10 recommendation. o Concurrent systemic therapy/RT followed by 19 1 1 10 adjuvant chemotherapy
o Concurrent systemic therapy/RT (category 3) 8 11 2 10
NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT NASO-2/NASO-3 (continued) • T1-4, N0-3, M1 o Oligometastatic disease Systemic therapy (if PS 0-1) followed 20 0 1 10 by RT Systemic therapy (if PS 0-1) followed 18 2 1 10 by cisplatin/RT 18 2 1 10 Systemic therapy (if PS 0-2) 19 1 1 10 Systemic therapy (if PS 0-2) followed 17 3 1 10 by RT, if CR or near CR Concurrent cisplatin + RT (if PS 0-1) o Widely metastatic and Good PS (0-2) Systemic therapy 20 0 1 10 Systemic therapy + consider RT if CR 19 1 1 10 or near CR o Widely metastatic and Poor PS (3-4) 19 0 2 10 Best supportive care NASO-B The panel consensus supported clarifying that 17 0 4 10 Internal request: gemcitabine/cisplatin is a category 1 recommendation for EBV-associated disease, category 2A for non-EBV- associated disease. Comment to consider clarifying that gemcitabine/cisplatin is a category 1 induction/sequential systemic therapy recommendation for EBV-associated disease.
NASO-B The panel consensus was to remove 13 0 8 10
Internal request: cisplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel from the other recommended induction/sequential systemic therapy options for Comment to consider removing nasopharynx cancer. cisplatin/epirubicin/paclitaxel from the other recommended induction/sequential systemic therapy options for nasopharynx cancer. NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT NASO-B The panel consensus supported the addition of cisplatin + 14 3 4 10 Internal request: RT followed by capecitabine for T4, N1-3 or any T, N2-3 nasopharynx cancer. This is a category 2B, other recommended regimen. Comment to consider adding the following systemic therapy/RT followed by adjuvant chemotherapy option for nasopharynx cancer Reference: based on recent data: Cisplatin + RT followed by capecitabine (for T4, N1-3 or any T, N2-3) Chen YP, Liu X, Zhou Q, et al. Metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet 2021;398:303-313.
NASO-B The panel consensus supported adding the following
Internal request: platinum-based regimens as options for those with nasopharynx cancer being treated with reirradiation + Comment to consider adding the following concurrent systemic therapy: platinum-based regimens as options for those with nasopharynx cancer being treated with • Cisplatin 20 0 1 10 reirradiation + concurrent systemic therapy: • Carboplatin (if cisplatin ineligible/intolerant) 18 1 2 10 These are category 2A recommendations. • Cisplatin • Carboplatin (if cisplatin References: ineligible/intolerant) • Kong F, Zhou J, Du C, et al. Long-term survival and late complications of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. BMC Cancer 2018;18:1139. • Lee VHF, Kwong DL, Leung T-W, et al. Hyperfractionation compared to standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiation therapy for patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2017;274:1067- 1078. NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT NASO-B The panel consensus supported adding the following Internal request: options for recurrent, unresectable, oligometastatic, metastatic nasopharynx cancer: Comment to consider adding cisplatin/gemcitabine + PD-1 inhibitor (eg, • Cisplatin/gemcitabine + pembrolizumab 14 2 5 10 pembrolizumab or nivolumab) as an option for o This is a category 2A, other recommended recurrent, unresectable, oligometastatic, regimen. metastatic nasopharynx cancer. • Cisplatin/gemcitabine + nivolumab 12 2 7 10 o This is a category 2A, other recommended regimen. References:
• Yang Y, Qu S, Li J, et al. Camrelizumab versus placebo
in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin as first- line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (captain-1st): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2021;22:1162-1174. • Mai H-Q, Chen Q-Y, Chen D, et al. Toripalimab or placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter randomized phase 3 trial. Nat Med 2021;27:1536-1543. SALI-B Based on the review of the data, the panel consensus was 7 6 8 10 External request: to include fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxk as an option for recurrent, unresectable or metastatic HER2+ salivary gland Submission from Daiichi Sankyo, Inc. on tumors. This is a category 2B, useful in certain 06/11/21 to consider adding “fam-trastuzumab circumstances recommendation. deruxtecan-nxki” under HER2 targeted therapy for HER2+ salivary gland tumors. Reference:
• Bando H, Kinoshita I, Modi S, et al. Trastuzumab
deruxtecan (T-DXd) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-expressing salivary duct carcinoma: Subgroup analysis of two phase 1 studies. J Clin Oncol 39, 2021 (suppl 15; abstr 6079). NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT SALI-B Based on a review of the data, the panel consensus Internal request: supported adding the following systemic therapy options for recurrent, unresectable, metastatic salivary gland tumors: • Paclitaxel Comment to consider adding the following o This is a category 2A, other recommended systemic therapy options for recurrent, regimen for non-adenoid cystic carcinoma (ACC) 14 1 6 10 unresectable, metastatic salivary gland tumors: o This is a category 2B, other recommended regimen for ACC 10 4 7 10 • Paclitaxel • Carboplatin/paclitaxel • Carboplatin/paclitaxel • Carboplatin/gemcitabine o This is a category 2A, other recommended regimen for non-adenoid cystic carcinoma 17 0 4 10 (ACC) o This is a category 2A, other recommended regimen for ACC • Carboplatin/gemcitabine 15 2 4 10 o This is a category 2A, other recommended 15 2 4 10 regimen References: • Gilbert J, Li Y, Pinto HA, et al. Phase II trial of taxol in salivary gland malignancies (E1394): a trial of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Head Neck. 2006;28:197-204. • Nakano K, Sato Y, Sasaki T, et al. Combination chemotherapy of carboplatin and paclitaxel for advanced/metastatic salivary gland carcinoma patients: differences in responses by different pathological diagnoses. Acta Otolaryngol. 2016;136:948-51. • Airoldi M, Fornari G, Pedani F, et al. Paclitaxel and carboplatin for recurrent salivary gland malignancies. Anticancer Res. 2000;20:3781-3. • Laurie SA, Siu LL, Winquist E, et al. A phase 2 study of platinum and gemcitabine in patients with advanced salivary gland cancer: a trial of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group. Cancer. 2010;116:362-8. NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT ADV-2/ADV-4 The panel consensus supported clarifying that treatment 21 0 0 10 with an alternate single-agent systemic therapy is an option Internal request: for those with metastatic disease (PS 2), if persistent Comment to clarify that treatment with an disease/progression after primary treatment with single- alternate single-agent systemic therapy is an agent systemic therapy. option for those with metastatic disease (PS 2), if persistent disease/progression after primary treatment with single-agent systemic therapy.
SYST-A (1 of 4) Based on the review of the data, the panel consensus 17 3 1 10
Internal request: supported the continued listing of weekly cisplatin as a primary systemic therapy + concurrent RT option for non- nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers, with a change in Comment to reassess the data for weekly category from a category 2B to a category 2A cisplatin as a primary systemic therapy + recommendation. concurrent RT option for non-nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers. References:
• Beckmann GK, Hoppe F, Pfreundner L, Flentje MP.
Hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy in combination with weekly cisplatin for locally advanced head and neck cancer. Head Neck 2005;27:36-43. • Medina JA, Rueda A, de Pasos AS, et al. A phase II study of concomitant boost radiation plus concurrent weekly cisplatin for locally advanced unresectable head and neck carcinomas. Radiother Oncol 2006;79:34-38. NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT SYST-A (2 of 4) Based on the review of the data, the panel consensus did 8 10 3 10 External request: not support the addition of nivolumab and ipilimumab as a first-line treatment option for R/M SCCHN with combined Submission from Bristol Myers Squibb on positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 20, due to limited 09/20/21 to consider the addition of nivolumab available data. and ipilimumab as a Category 2A recommended first-line treatment option for R/M SCCHN with Reference: combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 and CPS ≥ 20. Argiris A, Harrington K, Tahara M, et al. Nivolumab + ipilimumab vs EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: final results of CheckMate 651. Oral presentation at: 2021 European Society for Medical Oncology Congress; September 16-20, 2021; Virtual Meeting.
SYST-A (2 of 4) Based on the review of the data, the panel consensus 11 6 4 10
Internal request: supported the addition of cetuximab/pembrolizumab as an option for recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic non- nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers. This is a category Comment to consider adding 2B, useful in certain circumstances recommendation. cetuximab/pembrolizumab as an option for Reference: recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic non- • Sacco AG, Chen R, Worden FP, et al Pembrolizumab nasopharyngeal head and neck cancers. plus cetuximab in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: an open- label, multi-arm, non-randomised, multicentre, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2021 Jun;22(6):883-892. NCCN Guidelines for Head and Neck Cancers V.1.2022 – Interim on 10/15/21
Guideline Page Institution Vote
Panel Discussion/References and Request YES NO ABSTAIN ABSENT SYST-A (2 of 4) Based on a review of the data, the panel consensus 17 2 2 10 Internal request: supported the continued listing of pembrolizumab/platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin)/docetaxel as an option for recurrent, unresectable, or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal Comment to reassess the data for head and neck cancers, with a change in category from a pembrolizumab/platinum (cisplatin or category 2B to a category 2A recommendation. carboplatin)/docetaxel as an option for recurrent, References: unresectable, or metastatic non-nasopharyngeal • Burtness B, Harrington KJ, Greil R, et al. head and neck cancers. Pembrolizumab alone or with chemotherapy versus cetuximab with chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-048): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study. Lancet 2019;394:1915-1928. • Samlowski WE, Moon J, Kuebler JP, et al. Evaluation of the combination of docetaxel/ carboplatin in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN): a Southwest Oncology Group Phase II study. Cancer Invest 2007;25:182-188.