Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Psychology
Psychology
Psychology is the science of mind and behavior. Psychology includes the study of conscious and
unconscious phenomena, as well as feeling and thought. It is an academic discipline of immense
scope.
Psychology is the study of mind and behavior. It encompasses the biological influences, social
pressures, and environmental factors that affect how people think, act, and feel.
Gaining a richer and deeper understanding of psychology can help people achieve insights into
their own actions as well as a better understanding of other people.
TYPES OF PSYCHOLOGY
Psychology is a broad and diverse field that encompasses the study of human thought, behavior,
development, personality, emotion, motivation, and more. As a result, some different subfields
and specialty areas have emerged. The following are some of the major areas of research and
application within psychology:
Uses
The most obvious application for psychology is in the field of mental health where psychologists
use principles, research, and clinical findings to help clients manage and overcome symptoms of
mental distress and psychological illness. Some of the additional applications for psychology
include:
It is difficult to capture everything that psychology encompasses in just a brief definition, but
topics such as development, personality, thoughts, feelings, emotions, motivations, and social
behaviors represent just a portion of what psychology seeks to understand, predict, and explain.
The Major Goals of Psychology
IMPACT OF PSYCHOLOGY
Psychology is both an applied and academic field that benefits both individuals and society as a
whole. A large part of psychology is devoted to the diagnosis and treatment of mental health
issues, but that's just the tip of the iceberg when it comes to the impact of psychology.
Some of the ways that psychology contributes to individuals and society include:
POTENTIAL PITFALLS
There's a lot of confusion out there about psychology. Unfortunately, such misconceptions about
psychology abound in part thanks to stereotyped portrayals of psychologists in popular media as
well as the diverse career paths of those holding psychology degrees.
Sure, there are psychologists who help solve crimes, and there are plenty of professionals who
help people deal with mental health issues. However, there are also psychologists who:
No matter where psychologists work, their primary goals are to help describe, explain, predict,
and influence human behavior.
Science is the pursuit and application of knowledge and understanding of the natural and social
world following a systematic methodology based on evidence.
Scientific methodology includes the following:
Objective observation: Measurement and data (possibly although not necessarily using
mathematics as a tool)
Evidence
Experiment and/or observation as benchmarks for testing hypotheses
Induction: reasoning to establish general rules or conclusions drawn from facts or examples
Repetition
Critical analysis
Verification and testing: critical exposure to scrutiny, peer review and assessment
The fact has been widely recognized that the present stagnation of social sciences is fraught with
dangers for the physical existence of humanity. This premise being accepted, the article sets out
to discover the factors hampering the development of social sciences. These, it is here suggested,
have three sources:
(3) the limited applicability of the present‐day social sciences to the life of the private individual.
The difficulties attributable to the first source are two: the high degree of differentiation in
human psychology and the inventive capacity of the human mind. Both of them have the effect
of creating a pattern of behavior distinguished by great variety and rapidity of change. Ensuing,
to some extent, from the other two is the third characteristic, namely the fact that some of our
lines of behavior are incapable of being measured quantitatively. Under such conditions, the task
of scientific analysis is obviously extremely difficult, and this accounts for the strong “post‐ante”
bias inherent in most of our present‐day social sciences.
The empirical method of analysis, so much in vogue at present, has contributed two additional
difficulties of its own. These are: taxonomic approach and anti‐normative inclination. The former
is another way of saying that, unlike their predecessors in the 18th and 19th centuries, which
operated on the implied assumption of the perennial uniformity of human behaviour, the present‐
day social sciences have adopted the method of dealing with each situation as a unique case.
Consequently, the “social laws” derived from this procedure have only a limited validity.
It was the very simplicity of the social sciences of the preceding two centuries that made them
popular and gave them an influence over the actual shaping of public life, and, incidentally, it is
the lack of such simplicity that so effectually prevents the social sciences of today from winning
popularity. For it is manifest that, in the present state of social knowledge, an extremely
important aim of social science—probably the most important of all its aims—namely, to help
the individual to form a comprehensive and consistent outlook on life, is a dream of the very
distant future.
But, however formidable the difficulties in this field may be, the need for the social sciences of
our day to produce a coherent synthesis is most pressing. This is so because of (1) the decline in
the influence of religion, (2) the increasing capacity of man for self‐destruction and (3) the
existence of sharp political conflict between the communist and non‐communist worlds. This
necessity being admitted, a further problem arises. It is a question of popularizing the social
sciences. For, assuming that our social sciences are, or will shortly be, capable of serving as a
guide to the understanding of social life, it is obvious that unless such knowledge is widely
spread it will remain useless. Here the main stumbling‐block is the low earning power of social
sciences. Thus it would appear that the prospects of solving the problems connected with the
relative underdevelopment of our social knowledge are by no means hopeful.
WHAT IS LEARNING?
The word learning is used routinely in discussions about teaching in higher education, so it’s
important to clarify what we are referring to when we talk about learning. Educational
researchers agree that learning is much deeper than memorization and information recall. Deep
and long-lasting learning involves understanding, relating ideas and making connections between
prior and new knowledge, independent and critical thinking and ability to transfer knowledge to
new and different contexts.
It’s generally accepted that there are seven different learning styles. While most of us fall across
the spectrum of each of these styles, facilitating lessons that are engaging on all levels will give
your students the best chance of success.
Here we discuss strategies to improve engagement for students of each learning style.
Auditory learners might say words out loud or hum tones to better learn them. This strategy is
key for keeping musical learners engaged in class lessons.
How to engage an auditory and musical learner
If you’re a music teacher, you’re in luck. Auditory learners will be engaged from start to finish.
For other subjects however, engaging aural learners requires some tact and forethought.
The key here is your voice (and the voice of your students). Write down something on the
whiteboard, then read it out loud. Work on your delivery so you can express learning material in
interesting and engaging tones. Similarly, encourage your students to read back their own notes
to themselves (and the class). Hearing the sound of their own voice and the voices of others is
engaging to auditory learners, but it can be a great learning tool for students of all types.
Other strategies you can try include:
3. Verbal learner
Verbal learning includes both writing and speaking. Verbal learners might have a preference for
reading and writing, word games and poems. Verbal learners know the meanings of a broad
category of words, can use them effectively, and actively seek out new words to add to their
repertoire.
Some qualities associated with verbal learners include:
Intellectual
Bookworm
Good story teller
Verbal learners often seek out careers in journalism and writing, administration, law and politics.
Pattern recognition
Good with numbers
Predisposition towards grouping and classification
With logical students, always look to incorporate a system. If you’re unsure, include the students
in the development of that system. They’ll benefit from it greatly.
Physical learners represent about 5% of the population, and gravitate towards careers with lots of
hands on work like emergency services, physical education and sports.
Extraverted
Good communicator
Sensitive and empathetic
It’s important for educators to understand that not all social learners are extraverted or highly
communicative, and that they can also be visual, auditory, verbal, logical or physical learners.
The interpersonal aspect perhaps better describes the settings in which they are most
comfortable, rather than how they absorb information.
As such, teachers should be cognisant of the breadth of variation between different types of
social learners. For example, social doesn’t strictly mean verbal. Some social learners prefer to
listen in a group setting, rather than on their own