Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 136

THE ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS PSYCHOLOGICAL

WELL-BEING IN NEW NORMAL

A Research Paper
Presented to the Faculty of
College of Arts and Sciences
Laguna State Polytechnic University
Santa Cruz Main Campus
Santa Cruz, Laguna

In Partial Fulfillment of
The Requirements for the Degree of
Bachelor of Science in Psychology

GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN
MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO
JUNE 2021
ii

Republic of the Philippines


Laguna State Polytechnic University
Province of Laguna

APPROVAL SHEET

This thesis entitled “THE ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS


PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING” prepared and submitted by AGUSTIN,
GLYCELLE D. AND TUICO, MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. in partial fulfillment
for the degree BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN PSYCHOLOGY is hereby
recommended for approval and acceptance.

WILFREDO G. FAUSTINO JR., RPm


Adviser
________________________________________________________________________

Approved by the Committee on Oral Examination with a grade of ______.

CELESTE C. MARQUEZ, MSP VICTOR A. ESTALILLA, MA


Member Member

MA. CEZANNE G. DIMACULANGAN RALPH RANDEL R. RIVERA, RPm


Member Member

BIANCA MARIEL P. JUACALLA


Research Coordinator
________________________________________________________________________

Accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN PSYCHOLOGY.

RICHARD C. AMPO, Ed.D


Dean, College of Arts and Sciences

RINA J. ARCIGAL, Ed.D. _____________________


Chairperson, Research and Development Date Signed
RESEARCH CONTRIBUTION NO.
iii

DEDICATION

I humbly and wholeheartedly dedicated this study, to the people who stayed and help

me through ups and downs who gave me support, motivation, and inspiration to

encourage me and made everything possible for rhis study;

Family

To my dear and hardworking parents, Mr. Victor B. Tuico and Mrs. Lea A.Tuico;

To my supportive and loving sister, Ma. Flora Andrei A. Tuico,

To my girls, Angelique O. Violanda and Sky S. Articona.

To my grandmother, Mrs. Benita B. Tuico

Friends

To my thesis partner, Glycelle Agustin

To my Tropang Potchie and SHS Friends

To Honeys, Rayna, Gelo and Zaira

To my BS Psychology 3A

Others

To my clans, Arcigal, Articona and Tuico Family

To my paramour, Leonard Danielle P.Asuncion

And most of all, to our Almighty God, who gives me strength and guidance every day.

-M.L.V.A. T
iv

DEDICATION

The researcher’s family Alberto Agustin, Sherly Agustin and Bella Hermina Remoblas

for giving love and support. The researcher’s group of friends for the helped and

motivation to finish this research. Our Almighty God for the strength and guidance that

he is giving continuously.

-G.D. A
v

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

The researchers would like to express their profound gratitude to the following

who have contributed so much for the successful completion of the research paper.

Hon. Mario R. Briones Ed.D, the honorable president of the Laguna State

Polytechnic University – Sta. Cruz, Main Campus for providing a good quality education

for the researchers and for all the students.

Dr. Richard C. Ampo Ed.D, the Dean of College of Arts and Sciences for his

hard works and supporting the researchers.

Mr. Wilfredo G. Faustino Jr, RPm, the researchers’ research adviser for giving

knowledge and guiding to finish this work.

Mr. Ralph Randel R. Rivera, RPm, for re-assuring and checking the technical

errors of the study and for sharing her knowledge about research studies.

Mr. Victor A. Estalilla, MA, the researchers’ statistician for support.

Prof. Celeste C. Marquez, M.S.P, the researchers’ subject specialist, for giving

ideas on constructing the research.

Prof. Ma. Cezanne G. Dimaculangan, the researcher’s English critique for

checking the accurate grammar of the research.


vi

The researchers’ family Agustin and Tuico family, for the support financially,

motivations and unending love that they are giving, they serve as an inspiration and

source of strength.

The researchers’ friends giving emotional and moral support and their presence

especially in times of difficulties and continuously helping by sharing their knowledge.

And most specially our Almighty God for the strength, positivity of mind and

determination that the researchers can finish this thesis even if it’s difficult and there are

some hindrance along the way .


vii

ABSTRACT

The online education during the term of pandemic can really affect the students

who was adapting the flexible learning in new normal and that factor can affect the

psychological well-being of the students nowadays. Psychological well-being refers to

the students’ day to day function, happiness /health, life satisfaction and accomplishment

in online education. The main goal of the study was to determine the relationship of

between online education and psychological well-being of the students in new normal.

The researchers used the cluster sampling technique to determine the participants, self-

made questionnaire with reliability and validity testing for the survey. The research

design was correlational.

Through the research process the researchers were abled to determine the levels of

the factors of online education and psychological well-being. The level of online

education of most respondents was “strong extent of manifestation” specifically the

teachers effectiveness and internet connection, whereas the learning environment was

“moderate extent of manifestation”. The level of psychological well-being of most of

the respondents in the study particularly the personal growth and positive relations with

others was “strong extent of manifestation”, compare to the environmental mastery

which was “moderate extent of manifestation”. The researchers suggested to

universities and institutions in higher education that they should promote online

mindfulness intervention or conduct webinars with the topic related to help the instructors,

students, parents and individuals to balance their psychological well-being during online

education in new normal.


viii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Preliminaries Pages

TITLE………………………………………………………………………..……. i

APPROVAL SHEET ………………………………………………………...….. ii

DEDICATION………………………………………………………………….… iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT…………………………………………………………v

ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………..vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS….…………………………………………………..….viii

CHAPTER 1: THE PROBLEM AND ITS BACKGROUND

Introduction…………………….………………………………………………… 1

Background of the Study…...….…………………………………………………. 2

Theoretical Framework…… ….………………………………….................…… 3

Conceptual Framework……….….………………………………………………. 5

Statement of the Problem……..….………………………………………………. 6

Research Hypothesis ….…………………………………………………...……. 6

Significance of the Study……..….…………………………….…………………. 7

Scope and Limitation……..….…………………………………………………….7

Definition of Terms……………….…………………………………………….... 8

CHAPTER 2: REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

Review of Related Literature …………………………………................……….9

Review of Related Studies ….…………………………………………………. 22


ix

CHAPTER 3: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Research Design ….……………………………………………………………………. 34

Sampling Technique ….…………………………………………………………………34

Research Instrument ..................................................………………………………...... 35

Data Collection and Analysis ......................................……………………………….... 37

CHAPTER 4: Results and Discussion

Results and Discussion ……………………….………………………………………... 39

CHAPTER 5: SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Summary of Findings ……………………………………………………………….…. 49

Conclusion ............................................................…………………………................... 52

Recommendation ………………………………………………………………………. 53

BIBLIOGRAPHIES

APPENDICESS

CURRICULUM VITAE
x

LIST OF TABLES

Tables Pages
1. Distribution of Respondents in terms of Year Level ………………………..…... 35
2. Composite Reliability Statistics ……………………………………………......…36
3. Level of Online Education
In terms of Teacher’s Effectiveness ………………………………………….….. 39
4. Level of Online Education of the respondents
In terms of Internet Connection ………………………………….…………..….. 40
5. Level of Online Education of the respondents
In terms of Learning Environment …………………………………….……….…41
6. Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents
In terms of Environmental Mastery ……………………………………….…........42
7. Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents
In terms of Personal Growth …………………………………………………….. 43
8. Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents
In terms of Positive Relations with Others ………………………………………..44
9. Model Fit Measures …………………………………………………….……....... 46
10. Covariances…………..………...……….…………………..……………….…….47
xi

LIST OF FIGURES

Figures Pages

1. Conceptual Framework of the Study …………………………………….5


2. Path Diagram for Higher Order Confirmatory
Factor Analysis …………………………………………………………38
CHAPTER I

INTRODUCTION

COVID-19 is the biggest problem that the world is facing right now, numerous

people are affected in this pandemic and even the business and economy is also affected

since COVID-19 started. It was March 2020 when the Government of the Philippines

under President Rodrigo Duterte imposed an Enhanced Community Quarantine (ECQ) in

Luzon restricting the movement of the population except for necessity, work, and health

circumstances, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in the Philippines and later on it

was implemented Nationwide. The Government also decided to close the School and

Universities to prevent the rapid transmission of the virus, that’s why they decided to

come up a temporary way to continue the School Year despite of the problem.

In New Normal, Modular Distance Learning and Online Education are the

students’ way of learning in this Academic Year. Some of the Universities are using

Modular Distance Learning but most are using Online Education right now. The COVID-

19 pandemic forced the universities around the world to shut down their campuses and

move into online platform. In Online Education there are challenges that student

experiencing like access in the internet, learning environment, and teacher’s effectiveness

the researcher also experiencing those factors due to the sudden transition from face to

face to online education that affects their daily function and psychological well-being.

According to journal the impact of COVID-19 epidemic on mental health undergraduate

students, college students’ mental health has been raising concern experiencing

psychological distress many students are suffering from stress and anxiety (Cao et al.,

2020)
2

due to the transition of classes from face to face to Online Education. Students spend

their time going to school rather than staying at home that’s why this transition is

challenging for the students. In this new normal it has the potential to affect college

student’s emotional well-being that will be discussed in this research paper. The

researchers used self-made questionnaire to gather information and data to support the

study.

Background of the Study

Online learning or E learning is a term used to describe various learning

environments that are conducted and supported by the use of computers and the internet.

Since the COVID -19 pandemic has disrupted the normal lifestyle of people across the

globe, the virtual world has come to the rescue. Amongst many institutions’ schools have

also shifted their base to virtual platforms to conduct classes online. Consequently,

catering to the needs of all stages of education from pre-primary to university level,

online education has emerged as an alternative to ordinary face to face classes.

On the other hand, boredom is also caused by the increasing distance between

people, as a result of the policy of physical distancing and the prohibition to leave the

house. Anxiety then arises and gets worse because there is no interpersonal

communication (Galea, Merchant, & Lurie, 2020). Online learning that makes students

communicate through gadget intermediaries makes the interaction between one

individual and other individuals lack the meaning of non-verbal communication. The

absence of these interactions, coupled with restrictions on physical meetings, make

students bored.
3

The common problems in online learning education during pandemic are visible,

that might affect the student’s productivity and studies. There’s a struggle during online

classes and those struggles can have a relation on students psychological and well- being.

The purpose of this study is to know the student’s situation, feelings, and

emotions and the well-being in terms of psychological during the online education in new

normal. If the new form of learning will help the students to educate and have a

correlation on student’s well- being. In addition, this study might help the community,

government, school and university protocols to add a strategy in the new form of distance

learning in terms of online education with attribute relationships on student’s

psychological well-being.

Theoretical Framework

Ryff Scales of Psychological Well- Being

A theory that developed by Ryff, Carol Ryff’s model of Psychological Well-being

differs from past models in one important way: well-being is multidimensional, and not

merely about happiness, or positive emotions. A good life is balanced and whole,

engaging each of the different aspects of well-being, instead of being narrowly focused.

Ryff roots this principle in Aristotle’s Nichomachean Ethics, where the goal of life isn’t

feeling good, but is instead about living virtuously.


4

Carol Ryff’s categories of well-being are:

Environmental Mastery: High scores indicate that the respondent makes effective use

of opportunities and has a sense of mastery in managing environmental factors and

activities, including managing everyday affairs and creating situations to benefit personal

needs. An example statement for this criterion is "In general, I feel I am in charge of the

situation in which I live".

Personal Growth: High scores indicate that the respondent continues to develop, is

welcoming to new experiences, and recognizes improvement in behavior and self over

time. An example statement for this criterion is "I think it is important to have new

experiences that challenge how you think about yourself and the world".

Positive Relations with Others: High scores reflect the respondent's engagement in

meaningful relationships with others that include reciprocal empathy, intimacy, and

affection. An example statement for this criterion is "People would describe me as a

giving person, willing to share my time with others".

The researchers used the three factors of the scales of psychological well-being by

Ryff, in order to get the results that the researchers want. The Environmental Mastery,

Positive Relations with Others and Personal Growth is a perfect indicator for the

psychological well-being of the students during online education in new normal. The

connection of this theory on the online education is fit to measure both indicators of the

variables that the researchers want to discuss, to know and to measure according to this

study.
5

The relevant of this theory in the study is the capacity of the student’s

psychological well-being in online education during new normal. It means that the

factors of psychological well-being can help to determine the relationship of online

education and psychological well-being of the students

Conceptual Framework

The framework of this study illustrates the relationship between The Online Education

in New Normal and Students Psychological Well-being.

Figure 1 Conceptual Framework of the Study


6

The pattern of relationships among variables is described by the research

paradigm and it was developed to examine the relationship between online education and

student’s psychological well-being. The online education is teacher’s effectiveness,

internet connection and learning environment. The student’s psychological well-being are

environmental mastery, personal growth and positive relationship with others.

Statement of the Problem

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the Online Education in New

Normal and Students Psychological Well-being.

Specifically, this study will seek answer of the following:

1. What is the level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of?

1.1 Teachers Effectiveness

1.2 Internet Connection

1.3 Learning Environment

2. What is the level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of?

2.1 Environmental Mastery

2.2 Personal Growth

2.3 Positive Relations with others

3. Is there a significant relationship between the online education and student’s

psychological well-being?

Research Hypothesis

1. There is no significant relationship between the online education and

psychological well-being.
7

Significance of the Study

This study aimed to provide information about the relationship of Online

Education in Students Psychological Well-being in New Normal. The findings are of

great benefits to the following sectors of society:

The Students

This study is beneficial to the students who are in Online Education during this

new normal.

The School Administrators

It can help the school administrators to inform the connection of online

education in students’ psychological well-being in the new normal.

The Future Researchers

This study will help the future researchers to give insights and to know the

connection of online education in students’ psychological well-being.

The Instructors

This Study will help the instructors to provide ideas and strategies for adjustment

and adaptation on online education in New Normal.

Scope and Limitation

This study was conducted and only limited to the college students who’s taking

up Online Learning Education during New Normal and its limited only to the students

from Laguna State Polytechnic University Sta. Cruz, Campus Laguna. Furthermore, the

researchers were going to use the online platform to distribute the self- made

questionnaires to the respondents using google form. In addition, this study is limited to

check the relationship of Online Education in New Normal and Students Psychological
8

Well- Being. Anything not included in this study will define as research boundaries but

can be a good reference for research reliability.

Definition of Terms

The following terms will be operationally defined based on the conduct of this study:

Online Education. This refers to the platform where in students learn the lesson.

Students (First/Freshmen- Third/ Junior Students). This refers to the

respondents of this study. They are fit for this study because they are in Online Education.

Psychological Well-being. This refers to the students’ day to day function,

happiness /health, life satisfaction and accomplishment in online education.

New Normal. This refers to the way of living during COVID-19 pandemic.

Internet Connection. This refers to the way where in students can be able to

attend their Online Education.

Learning Environment. This refers to the place where students stay during

Online Education.

Teachers Effectiveness. This refers to the professors’ way of teaching and

approach to the students during Online Education.

Positive Relations with Others. Having a satisfying, trusting relationship with

others and concerned about the welfare with others.

Environmental Mastery. The feeling of being in charge or involve in one

situation and how to handle it.

Personal Growth. Insight of an individual about self in terms of growing,

expanding, experiences and development


9

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter consists of the review of related literature and studies in which the

researchers have gathered.

Review of Related Literature

Some students without reliable internet access and/or technology struggle to

participate in digital learning; this gap is seen across countries and between income

brackets within countries. For example, whilst 95% of students in Switzerland, Norway,

and Austria have a computer to use for their schoolwork, only 34% in Indonesia

do, according to OECD data.

As explained by Baticulon, Alberto, Baron, Mabulay, Rizada, Sy, and Reyes

(2020) identified the obstacles to e-Learning in five types: technological, personal,

families, institutional and communities, and only 41 per cent of students thought they

could physically and mentally participate in online study. However, the above reasons

make students’ fear of academic year loss.

As stated by Adam, Kaye, and Haßler (2020). Due to digital inequalities and lack

of access to modern technology, students from lower-income families have limited or no

access to online classes. At the same time, excessive internet cost is another obstacle to

access online-classes.

As mentioned by Auxier and Anderson (2020). Many students acquire

knowledge prominently; some do not. This knowledge acquiring procedure depends on


10

how they are treated by resource availability or access to learning tools. Due to social and

economic dividends, many students suffer from access to new technology resources. At

the same time, a lack of IT knowledge was identified as a significant impediment to non-

technical instructors. Moreover, the nature of e-Learning (limited time, interpretation, and

assessment methods) compared to traditional classroom methods, makes student

dissatisfied. In this technological world, around 25% of teens from lower-income families

do not have a home computer

According to Hasan and Bao, (2020). Lack of technical support from institutes

and instructors, inadequate access to technology, and overall lack of e-Learning content

development experience are seen as the major obstacles to efficient e-Learning systems.

Because of these challenges, students are mentally frustrated to complete their courses

successfully.

Based on the literatures, the researchers can say that the percentage of the students

has access on internet connection was low average. It means that the internet access

might be one of the obstacles to online learning education during pandemic.

Son et al (2020) stated that a vast majority of participants (173/195, 89%) indicated

difficulty in concentrating on academic work due to various sources of distraction. Nearly

half of them (79/173, 46%) mentioned that their home is a distractive environment and a

more suitable place to relax rather than to study. Participants mentioned that they were

more prone to be interrupted by their family members and household chores at home.
11

As claimed by Son et al (2020) some participants (23/159, 14%) mentioned the

uncertainty about their grades under the online learning environment to be a major

stressor. Others (12/159, 8%) indicated their reduced motivation to learn and tendency to

procrastinate.

For online-learning environments according to D'Errico et al.

(2016) demonstrated that students' positive emotions across different online-learning

activities are higher than negative emotions, particularly during synchronous activities

with a teacher and with peers. They also found that experiencing positive emotions

during exam preparation strongly correlates with students' motivation supporting students

learning process and learning outcome.

Another important theme discussed in articles concerned with the abrupt

transition to online education deals with the need for pedagogic flexibility to ensure that

students’ wellbeing and their access to equitable and inclusive learning environments are

given prominent attention mentioned by (Al-Rabiaah et al., 2020, Craig et al., 2020,

Liguori and Winkler, 2020, Selwyn, 2020, Thompson and Copeland, 2020, Toquero,

2020). Thompson and Copeland (2020), for example, argue that an emergency course

redesign, which prioritizes students’ accessibility to the educational material at the onset

of the transition, will ensure that more disadvantaged students succeed in the online

learning environment. Equally important, however, is the fact that such redesign is likely

to help alleviate students’ anxiety caused by sudden life changes including the abrupt

shift of all courses to online. Indeed, numerous studies have emphasized the need for

educational institutions to prioritize the physical, mental and psychological wellbeing of


12

their students and educators over the need to teach the curriculum according to (Bozkurt

and Sharma, 2020, Quintana and Quintana, 2020, Sahu, 2020).

In addition, some of these studies draw attention to various hurdles which could

impede an effective delivery of online education including the unpreparedness of most

institutions, staff members and students to participate in massive and emergency online

courses claimed by (Bozkurt et al., 2020, Flaxman et al., 2020b, Zhang et al., 2020);

digital, economic, social and gender disparities among participants which have a direct

impact on the availability of online teaching infrastructure and accessibility to technology

and internet facilities stated by (Adnan and Anwar, 2020, Kapasia et al., 2020, Zhang et

al., 2020); the inadequate psychological, social and academic support provided to

students (Adnan and Anwar, 2020, Bozkurt et al., 2020); and the unfavorable home

environment for many students and educators (Kapasia et al., 2020, Zhang et al., 2020).

These hurdles are expected to exasperate participants’ susceptibility to psychological

pressure and necessitate a pedagogy of care and empathy according to (Bozkurt et al.,

2020, Bozkurt and Sharma, 2020, Selwyn, 2020).

Learning Environment is one of the factors that can help the students in many

ways, either positive or negative. It has a huge percentage that the learning environment

of the students has a huge impact on the student’s motivations and cab affect the online

learning education.

As stated by (Son et al 2020) for those who were experiencing increased

workloads, nearly half (51/106, 48%) thought they needed to increase their own efforts to

catch up with online classes and class projects given the lack of in-person support from
13

instructors or teaching assistants. Additionally, actions taken by professors, such as

reduced course loads, open book examinations, and other allowances on grading

requirements, could also have contributed to alleviating or reducing stress.

According to Arwen (2020), Teachers are still not accustomed to teaching by

utilizing complex online media that must be packaged effectively, easily accessed and

understood by students. While students really need a culture of learning to attend and the

habit of learning to follow learning through computers or gadgets. Thus, the teacher is

required to be able to design or design online learning that is lightweight and effective, by

utilizing appropriate online devices or media and in accordance with the material being

taught. Although online learning will provide wider opportunities to explore the material

to be taught, the teacher must be able to choose and limit the extent of the scope of the

material and what applications are suitable for the material and learning methods used.

Many teachers over-insist an application that is considered contemporary and cool, but it

is not in accordance with the initial purpose of an online learning, which is to facilitate

students to get learning or education in this covid-19 pandemic situation. Instead of

helping to alleviate psychological burdens, it actually makes students stressed,

coupled with a large number of assignments that are not measured by their teacher.

As was expected, this study established that a high proportion of the preclinical

medical students expressed concern on their medical education, particularly their

anatomy teaching. This concern is the by‐product result of the unprecedented times

brought about by Covid‐19 pandemic explained by (Franchi, 2020). The sudden changes

in both the university life and teaching creates anxiety, apart from fear of contracting the
14

virus and being in isolation mentioned by(Dubey et al., 2020; Han et al., 2020; Rajkumar,

2020; Sher, 2020). Anxiety also arises from the isolation from friends and academic staff

according to (Pather et al., 2020).

In short order, face-to-face classes were halted, and emergency online learning

became the optimal, and in many cases the only, alternative available. Although this

measure has proven to be one of the most highly effective non-pharmaceutical

interventions imposed by governments in containing the spread of the disease in

accordance with (Flaxman et al., 2020a, Moosa, 2020), it has also put all those involved

in the educational process under substantial pressure. This is particularly true because

many instructors and learners who had never had adequate (if any) experience with

online learning found themselves obliged to do so with minimal support. In addition,

most higher education systems lacked the necessary equipment “to offer online learning

for all students at scale, quickly” as claimed by (World Bank, 2020. Italics in original).

Explained by (DeVaney et al., 2020, Hodges et al., 2020). In many cases, the

result of emergency online learning was a substantial compromise to the quality of the

learning experience However, given the suddenness of the matter and the difficulty and

uncertainty of the situation, it is understandable that all parties involved in the

educational process would be forgiving and accepting of a less-than-perfect performance,

especially during the first wave of the pandemic.

Numerous studies have warned against confusing well-planned online learning

which requires careful instructional design, long planning and a special teaching

infrastructure with the swift and temporary shift to online learning carried out during the
15

extraordinary conditions of COVID-19 for the purpose of maintaining instruction

according to (Bozkurt et al., 2020, Fujita, 2020, Hodges et al., 2020, Selwyn, 2020).

Within this context, it has been argued that confusing quality online learning with

emergency online learning could have a long-term damaging effect on the former because

educators and students who have limited or no prior experience with online learning will

possibly presume that this mode is a poor substitute to the face-to-face mode explained

by (Bozkurt et al., 2020, Hodges et al., 2020, Lederman, 2020).

Effectiveness of the instructors or teachers nowadays plays an important role to

the quality and flexibility of online education. But in this case, it seems that the school or

university instructors and administrators didn’t plan well this school year since its

utilizing online platforms.

Mental health and academic achievement are linked, research shows. Chronic

stress changes the chemical and physical structure of the brain, impairing cognitive skills

like attention, concentration, memory, and creativity. “You see deficits in your ability to

regulate emotions in adaptive ways as a result of stress,” said Cara Wellman, a professor

of neuroscience and psychology at Indiana University in a 2014 interview. In her research,

Wellman discovered that chronic stress causes the connections between brain cells to

shrink in mice, leading to cognitive deficiencies in the prefrontal cortex.

A survey by Cao et al. (2020), which includes 7143 participants of college

students, found around 25% of students are suffering from severe anxiety due to e-

Learning crack-up. Another study by (Lee, 2020) reported that approximately 83% of

students experience the worst situation, and 26% of students are unable to get access to
16

mental health support. This condition offers a situational demand to measure

psychological distress.

The psychological response to the COVID-19 pandemic and online knowledge

acquisition Affected by the use of social media, the perception of the pandemic at a

personal level appears to be driving more positive interpersonal communication. Yet, as it

pertains specifically to social media, the copious amount of information found there may

lead to information overload, which could result in mental health problems mentioned by

(Gao etal., 2020). As expressed in the “stressor-strain-outcome model,” the excessive

amount of pandemic information sent via social media exceeds the user’s ability to

process and absorb it, which will have a negative impact on the psychology and behavior

of social network users, thus affecting online knowledge acquisition mentioned by (Dhir,

Yossatorn, Kaur, & Chen, 2018; Whelan, Islam, & Brooks, 2020). Social media

frequently push pandemic information into the world, where friends in social groups

quickly and repeatedly retransmit this information, which can easily cause psychological

negative emotions; to a certain extent, this can affect the willingness and enthusiasm of

knowledge acquisition according to (Zhang, Zhao, Lu, & Yang, 2016).

Stated by (Cao et al. 2020; Huckins et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020),

the Covid-19 outbreak has disrupted the lives of many people across the world. The rapid

increase in cases of infection, worldwide, has created uncertainty and anxiety about what

is going to happen. It has also caused a tremendous level of stress among students.

Previous studies have suggested that public health emergencies such as the Covid-19

pandemic can have many psychological effects on college students, which can be

expressed as anxiety, fear, and worry, among others.


17

According to (Dod et al. 2021) University students have been identified as a “very

high risk population” for mental health difficulties. Large studies conducted in Australian

universities have reported elevated levels of generalized psychological distress and severe

depressive symptoms when compared to population samples. Studies in the United States

and United Kingdom have reported similar findings among tertiary student.

Psychological distress negatively impacts student learning, participation, and their

experience of university life, so it is important for universities to understand the student

experience of particular stressors to better support their psychological wellbeing.

Psychological Well-being is the other factor of the study that can affect by other factors.

It seems the Psychological Well-being of the students during pandemic while on online

learning education can cause psychological distress and other underlying issues.

As stated by (Lischer et al 2020) there are several plausible explanations for why

students may feel stressed or anxious during the Covid-19 outbreak, including additional

study-related uncertainties or worries about career prospects. Nevertheless, the results of

the survey suggest that the students coped well with stresses that occurred during the

lockdown. Moreover, the majority of the students felt well supported and expressed their

appreciation of the lecturers.

Online education as synchronized and a synchronized distance learning is not new

in academia, but it has mainly been viewed as supplementary to traditional in-person

education due to concerns with students feeling disconnected with teaching materials,

fellow students, teachers, or the whole program explained by (Phirangee & Malec, 2017).

However, online education is now being considered the main way for students to

socialize, connect with their peers and teachers, and continue their learning.
18

As stated by (Newman & Holzman, 2013) Learning is a process that best occurs

within a social context that involves interactions and sharing of personal experiences and

observations with other individuals in a group. Student engagement and interaction are

necessary for students to achieve higher-order thinking (i.e., critical thinking,

collaborative problem-solving, etc.), co-construct knowledge, and build a community of

learning. Engaging with others in online education can help students to develop a ‘sense

of community’ in which they develop and share their own gradual understanding of the

context leading to the co-creation of knowledge. Critical reflection on their own learning,

as well as those around them, can also assist students in advancing and strengthening

their meta-cognitive skills explained by(Bernstein & Isaac, 2018).

According to (Dod et al 2021) Overall, students reported that COVID-19 had a

huge impact on their studies in the last two weeks (86.8%), with this impact being mainly

negative on their overall learning experience (70.9%; ). The most common negative

study-related impacts were finding it hard to interact with other students (84.6%) and

teachers (74.6%) online, and it being more difficult to learn online than face-to-face

(74.7%). Specifically, it has been demonstrated that students have higher risks of having

feelings of loneliness and are particularly prone to anxiety and depression when

compared with the general population [1]. During this time of uncertainty and sudden

shift to online teaching mode, it is unexpected to see psychological issues emerging more

among students. The lockdown could have created feelings of loss of connections to

friends and deprivation of the extracurricular activities which the students were enjoying

while in the school environment. The uncertainties regarding their future and careers
19

could have also worsened the situation leading to development of some mental issues

amongst them.

Positive relations with others is the means the connection with each other,

nowadays this is important because. This variables has a huge positive impacts on the

students nowadays that can add positivity and motivation.

Literature highlights certain deficiencies, such as the weakness of online-teaching

infrastructures, the inexperience of teachers regarding new technologies, the information

gap, the complex environment at home, and so forth claimed by (Ali 2020). Furthermore,

students have a wide range of distractions when studying at home. For example, not all

are able to find suitable spaces for home learning, or studying may be constrained by

insufficient hardware and unstable networks explained by (Zhang et al. 2020). Findings

suggest that students, as well as the general population, may be experiencing

psychological effects from the outbreak of Covid-19, such as anxiety, fear, and worry,

among others mentioned by (Cao et al. 2020; Li et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2020).

A survey among 7143 medical college students (aged 19–25 years) reported that

24.9% experienced anxiety because of the COVID-19 outbreak (0.9% experiencing

severe anxiety, 2.7% moderate anxiety, and 21.3% mild anxiety; Cao et al. 2020). For

college and university students, postponement of events such as study exchanges and

graduation ceremonies is also a factor that contributes to poor mood states. Some students

have lost their part-time jobs because local businesses have closed (Lee 2020). The

delivery mode from face-to-face classroom teaching to online classes has become an

obstacle for some students especially for those living in remote areas that do not have
20

access to laptops and Internet facilities at home. This can cause mental stress in terms of

not being able to attend online classes stated by (Sahu 2020).

According to (LeBlanc, 2020; Moor, 2020) Nevertheless, for many institutions,

teachers (faculty, educators, curriculum developers, and facilitators) and students this

shift to virtual delivery is an unplanned, unwanted, and uneasy learning experiment as the

global academic community responds to the COVID-19 pandemic by moving to a virtual

environment, recognition of how these changes are affecting our teachers and students

physically, mentally, socially, and academically is crucial. This is not a normal time for

many students (and faculty). The existential threat of the pandemic and the imminent

threat of a global economic recession have made these days quite challenging and

difficult for many students, adding to their anxiety and depression all around the world.

(Dod et al 2021) stated that the students were invited to tell us more about any

burden that they were experiencing as a result of the pandemic. Common responses were:

hard adjusting to changed living conditions such as moving back in with parents or living

arrangements not conducive to study (e.g., share house situations, whole families

working from home); financial pressures including still paying for student

accommodation—while not living at the premises—to keep their place; mental health

deterioration including anxiety and loneliness; limited time to study due to childcare

responsibilities; feeling unmotivated by not having the social aspect of attending on

campus; uncertainty about future impacts on academic progression, grades, graduation,

and job security; and dissatisfaction with online learning .

The study shows that more than half of the students interviewed were not

satisfied with online mode of teaching compared to the traditional face-to-face approach
21

explained by Abedalla et al (2020). Revealed that students in Saudi Arabia preferred on

the-ground teaching to online education. Also, a study conducted by Baloran (2020),

among students in Philippines shows that 59.25% of the respondents disagreed with the

conduct of the Online-Blended Learning Approach. Similarly, Ja’ashan revealed. Thus,

online mode of teaching has become remarkably popular and has been found to be

convenient, less intimidating to students and flexible. Thus, online approach comes in

handy in engaging students in the era of COVID-19 pandemic in some tertiary

institutions such as Bowen University, Iwo, Nigeria. However, online mode of teaching is

not without some challenges. For instance, it is less interactive compared to the

traditional mode of teaching.

Being in charge into something means a responsibility, efforts and patients are

needed, Environmental Mastery plays an important role on the psychological well-being

of the students, it measures the mastery of the students in their works.

According to Lischer et al (2020) students handled the new situation

pragmatically. While some students tackled the work with a high degree of discipline and

explicitly emphasized the advantages of the increased personal responsibility and

independent working, (n=82), others expressed difficulties in concentrating and

maintaining the necessary motivation for distance learning (n=76).

The common challenge of online education – its potential for causing a sense of

isolation and disconnection with other classmates (also referred to as ‘losing human

touch’) – remains quite high risking some students to lose interest in engaging with their

course/program stated by (Garrison, 2016; Martin & Bolliger, 2018; Stone et al., 2017).
22

In this present scenario, the anxiety among the students is rising. Due to

coronavirus pandemic, students and faculty members are facing stress caused due to the

disturbance in their personal and work lives. To cope up in such a public health crisis and

to maintain sound mental health, both the students and the teachers are to rely on each

other. In this study, we aim to assess the anxiety, depression and stress level of Indian

students during COVID-19 outbreak and the reasons for such fear and anxiety according

to (Desai 2020).

Face-to face interactions help to create lasting bonds between the tutor and his

students as well as between students themselves. It also allows for diffusion of culture,

experiences, and knowledge among students. In terms of academic performance of

students, studies have shown a comparable effectiveness between online and the

traditional face-to-face method in all, 55.0% of the respondents in the current study had

decreased psychological wellbeing explained by Ajibola et al, 2020.

Personal Growth means being independent, it can measure the student’s personal

space and independency. During new normal it seems the personal growth can affect the

students’ psychological well-being.

Review of Related Studies

Chaney (2010) stated that the expansive nature of the Internet and the

accessibility of technology have generated a surge in the demand for web-based teaching

and learning. Distance learning is a rapidly expanding environment which allows users

the flexibility of operating outside of the constraints of time and place. Online learning

can be defined as “learning that takes place partially or entirely over the Internet”. Online
23

learning is appealing to a range of learners and is becoming more commonplace in

settings from elementary schools to high school and into post-secondary education.

According to Oswal and Meloncon (2014) in education an estimated one in ten

students has some form of disability. A study revealed that in 2007-2008, 11 percent of

undergraduates and 8 percent of graduate students reported having some form of

disability. Online learning may be the only way “that some students can independently

access courses and course-materials – something that is a powerful reminder of the need

for accessible online distance education”.

As said by Oswal and Meloncon (2014) In order to create democratic online

teaching environments, accessibility needs to be at the forefront of course creation.

Burgstahler stated, “Designed correctly, distance education online options create learning

opportunities for everyone. Designed poorly, they erect barriers to equal participation in

academics and careers”. Accessibility has a profound effect on student engagement and

academic performance, therefore greatly impacting the success of the learner.

Adam et al (2020) claimed Due to digital inequalities and lack of access to

modern technology, students from lower-income families have limited or no access to

online classes. At the same time, excessive internet cost is another obstacle to access

online-classes.

Joosten and Cusatis (2020) stated that remote learning offers students with

elasticity in where and when they learn. Students have more control in when and how

they complete course learning activities. However, the online learning necessitates
24

diverse qualities of students such as knowledge of technology use, time management and

organization, and interaction using online technologies.

As explained by Chaney (2010) The need for flexible learning environments for

potential learners who are hospitalized, have phobias linked to school environments, are

single parents, have been expelled, are dropouts seeking to gain a diploma and many

other specific cases have led to a growth in the amount of distance learning courses and

programs that are offered. Online learning has the potential to create educational

opportunities for individuals who may have faced unsurpassable barriers prior to the

expansion of online educational programs.

Thomson (2010) stated that online learning allows for students to work at a time

and a place that is compatible with their learning needs. A number of instructors and

students commented on their ability to focus more of their attention on the content of the

course and less on issues such as parking, traffic, and other problems that may arise when

attending a traditional class environment.

Thomson (2010) claimed that although some literature highlights the lack of

community as a deficit in the online learning environment, others have suggested that

student-student interaction is much less of a concern than student-instructor and student-

content interaction. In a study by Thomson, one instructor observed that many students

desire to work independently and at different paces than their peers, therefore eliminating

the need for communication among their classmates. Another instructor stated “students

are taking online courses for content not for social interaction” and then hypothesized

that “peer interaction and collaboration is valuable for younger students”.


25

As claimed by Oswal and Meloncon (2014) Online learning has the capacity to

break down barriers that have restricted individuals from an equitable education in the

past. In order to establish a learning environment that is conducive for all participants, the

students’ needs must be put first to establish courses that are accessible for all learners.

Farrel et al (2019) stated that the students consider the new educational

environment as an opportunity to develop new skills that may help them in their

professional careers. University students are old enough to handle online work and are

technologically savvy enough to navigate new digital tools and methods therefore, they

do not see to have technical difficulties in learning through e-courses. However, our

students note that the most important disadvantage about distance learning is the inability

to interact with fellow students and instructors, together with non-visual communication

during online courses and the lack of cooperation with their classmates. On the other

hand, they say that whether the instructor’s camera is turned on is not of great importance.

Thomson (2010) mentioned that Courses should be well organized from the very

start, providing the students with detailed instructions and expectations. Instructors

should anticipate areas of potential misunderstanding and dismiss unclear directives prior

to the start of the course. Misunderstandings can be minimized through a very detailed

syllabus, course calendar, useful links, and course information that is chunked into

digestible pieces.

According to Savenye (2010) Interaction between the learner and the content is

the most common type of interaction that occurs in online settings, through lectures and

readings. Online instructors can orchestrate the class environment to increase the

interaction between the learner and the instructor and the learner and other learners
26

through both synchronous and asynchronous interactions. There are a multitude of

options for online learning students to work collaboratively and cooperatively with other

learners and/or the instructor in live debates, reflective journal entries, peer reviews,

discussion boards, and video or audio teleconferencing.

Thomson (2010) mentioned that many instructors spoke to the benefit of the

individualized atmosphere of the online course and how to best capitalize on the one-to-

one correspondence. Differentiating instruction in a traditional classroom can be very

difficult due to the simultaneous interaction that an instructor must have with the students,

“by contrast addressing individual needs of each student is easier to do with online

students, since the nature of the system is more geared to individuals”.

As claimed by Oswal and Meloncon (2014) one study focused on instructors who

taught fully online courses, while the second study looked at instructors who taught

hybrid courses. The data highlighted a discrepancy in accessibility and students with

disabilities enrollment in the instructors’ courses. The report revealed that 54 percent of

instructors stated that their course was not accessible. Another issue that was exposed

was the common theme among instructors (20 percent) was the belief that the issue of

accommodating students with disabilities was not their responsibility. Instructors

admitted that they lacked knowledge, experience, and resources to meet the identified

needs of the students.

As mentioned by Oswal and Meloncon (2014) one instructor voiced their

concerns on the lack of resources, time, and personnel to adequately accommodate

students with identified needs by stating: It is tough enough to design an online course; to

design for accessibility adds another layer of design for which we have not been trained.
27

The challenge is access to resources to make the courses ADA compliant and time and

personnel who can help with such issues.

Online Education has an underlying variables and factors namely, internet

connection, learning environment and teacher’s effectiveness. Based on the literatures

each factors plays important role and can affect the student’s psychological well-being

during new normal. There’s always a lack in each factors that can cause the students

distress during online education in new normal. It means the students can’t be flexible at

all time.

Lee (2020) reported that approximately 83% of students experience the worst

situation, and 26% of students are unable to get access to mental health support. This

condition offers a situational demand to measure psychological distress among college

students due to the negative perception of the e-Learning system. To date, however, there

has been no comprehensive research performed into psychological distress due to the

negative perception of e-Learning among college students during this pandemic. Thus,

the main objective of this study is to assess the impact of “e-Learning crack-up”

perception on psychological distress among college students during the COVID-19

pandemic.

The situation will get worse if they are prohibited from leaving the house without

outdoor activities and lack of interaction with their peers. Bored, stressed, afraid of being

exposed to viruses, the spread of false information (hoaxes), and worsening family

financial conditions can occur. The burden of online lecture tasks is one of the

contributing factors to students' stress levels, which requires them to use online media

that they have just learned and must immediately understand. This is reinforced by
28

research that found that public health emergencies can have many psychological effects

on students, which can be expressed in the form of anxiety, fear, and anxiety stated by

(Sharp & Theiler, 2018).

Based on Mulawarman University policy on March 18, 2020, which calls for all

lecture activities to be carried out online, research is needed on the impact of online

learning and solute efforts in overcoming effects as part of research recommendations.

This research is essential because in uncertain and uncertain situations when this outbreak

will end, social psychological scientific research is needed to help find progressive steps

in providing psychological welfare for affected communities, not only positive victims of

COVID-19 but the community in general, in this study, especially students.

This pandemic carries not only the risk of death from a viral infection but also

psychological stress for people throughout the world explained by (Xiao, 2020).

Continuous dissemination, strict isolation measures, and online learning problems at all

levels of education are expected to affect mental health, including students. A study was

conducted on the psychological effects of the COVID-19 epidemic on students in China,

carried out quantitatively, with 7,143 respondents filling out a questionnaire stated by

(Cao et al., 2020).

The Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia estimates that

34.5 percent of students are unable to access online education. Significant efforts are

being made by governments and educational institutions at all levels to find practical

solutions in online learning amid the COVID-19 outbreak. This action helps parents to

accompany their child's education at home and at least reduce parents' concerns about the

quality of online learning. A study shows that when students are not at school, for
29

example, holidays or study at home, they are physically less active and have a longer

time to use mobile phones, and so their use will also feel saturated, even with severe,

mild stress according to (Brazendale et al., 2017).

There is an extensive and growing literature that documents how students do

much better when they have developed a sense that they belong and they matter in

general, but especially in their places of learning explained by (Allen, Kern, Vella-

Brodrick, Hattie, &Waters, 2018) Connection to others is key when it comes to online

learning stated by (Seiver & Troja,2014). The benefits of mattering as a resource during

the pandemic have been described at length according to (Flett & Zangeneh, 2020).

Lack of proper interaction with instructors is another major concern associated

with online learning. Additionally, concerns regarding any content of the online course

are usually discussed with the relevant course instructor by e-mail, which requires

response time. Virtual classes cannot be of interest to students who are tactile learners.

Conventional classroom socialization is another major missing in online learning reported

by (Zhong, 2020).

As claimed by (Zhong, 2020). Nonetheless, it was a reminder of the lack of

resources in academic institutions and the social marginalization of students, where

insufficient access and availability of the internet and the lack of latest technology

affected organizational responsiveness and students' capacity to participate in digital

learning.

(McCarthy, 2020) stated that educational institutions are also the focal points of

social activities and interactions. If educational activities are suspended, many children

and young people will miss social interaction-based activities that are necessary for
30

growth and learning. Students should continue to learn, particularly underprivileged

children and young adults, both of whom are impacted by school’s suspension, so this is

a huge issue to be tackled. While short term closure of academic institutions as a

consequence of emergencies is not recent, the global scope and pace of present-day

educational instability are sadly unparalleled and, if sustained, may inflict psychological

distress and misery at various levels.

The interaction between students and teachers is mediated by technology, and the

design of learning environments (e.g., space where learning occurs) can have

considerable influence on learning outcomes claimed by (Bower, 2019).

According to a study, initially, individuals feel happy with a long holiday

because they can rest more and do nothing. Over time, according to Wilson, individuals

will feel bored because they cannot leave the house and do nothing. This research shows

that something that is done statically, it will cause boredom. This condition applies

during the COVID-19 outbreak stated by (Williams, Armitage, Tampe, & Dienes, 2020).

In accordance with (Bao, Sun, Meng, Shi, & Lu, 2020) psychological dynamics

shows the background of the occurrence of boredom in students, caused by various social

conditions that occur in their environment. Not only that, the increasing number of

patients and suspected cases, as well as the growing number of countries affected by the

outbreak, have raised fears of the public being infected in this outbreak, which has

increased anxiety.

As mentioned by (Hermawan & Tyas, 2018). Perception is the stage of knowing

the environment including objects, people, and symbols or signs that involve the process

of recognition. Meanwhile, it states that perception is the initial process of an individual


31

in interpreting sensory impressions in order to give meaning to their environment. This

shows that perception is a person's response to what they receive with their surroundings,

but basically this is likely to be different from reality.

(Römer, 2020) stated that Millions of students have not been able to continue

learning in schools, universities, vocational training institutions and adult learning

programmes. Many governments responded to the pressing need to provide school

children with learning possibilities via online and distance learning. Although precautions

were taken, the students ' learning process was negatively affected. Students who have

been stripped of their freedom due to COVID-19 are deeply concerned about when face

to face education will happen.

(Worldometers 2020) said that this situation can be claimed to make young people

psychologically more risky than other age groups. In other words, although variables

such as life styles, physical strength, developmental characteristics and less possibility of

being affected by the virus that caused the epidemic may provide them a protective role

against the COVID-19 epidemic, just the opposite they may also become risk factors. In

general, although virus-related deaths are not common among young people, there is a

great deal of restriction in their social life and uncertainty about when this isolation

process will end. Therefore, young people are thought to have psychological

consequences such as loneliness, depression, anger, pessimism, and hopelessness.

As stated by (Hodges et al., 2020) online learning material must be provided in

ways that enhance the learning experience. This requires a deeper understanding of the

factors that influence online learning. As mentioned before, there is extensive literature

related to online learning, but not enough about the students’ perception of emergency
32

remote teaching and learning. This is particularly important because students had to do it

and not because they decided to venture into online learning.

Thomson (2010) explained that students tend to share some commonalities such

as viewing themselves as committed and responsible for their own learning, preferring to

learn through tactile and kinesthetic senses, generally choosing to work independently

from others, and needing less structure in their learning setting. “Taken together, these

finding suggest that regular classroom instruction, which often emphasizes high-auditory

memory skills, structure, fact learning, and peer collaboration, may not be ideal for some

gifted learners who are highly tactual, conceptual, open/flexible, and independent

learners”.

According to (Heckel & Ringeisen, 2019).Another consideration is the user's

affect toward the learning experience. Affect includes the user enjoyment and satisfaction

with the prior use of an information system, the affect toward the use of technology, and

the individual's emotional state (Kemp et al., 2019). Findings suggest that there are

negative correlations between negative emotions and cognitive processes and learning

outcomes.

According to Daryanto (2014), Fadlillah (2014), Keyes (2010), Kunandar (2013)

the learning process in educational units is held in an interactive, inspirational, fun,

challenging, motivating way for students to participate actively, and provides sufficient

space for initiatives. Creativity and independence according to the talents, interests, and

physical and psychological development of students. For this reason, each education unit

carries out learning planning, implementation of the learning process and assessment of

the learning process to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of the achievement of
33

graduate competencies. In accordance with the Graduate Competency Standards and

Content Standards, the principles of learning curriculum 2013 are a) from students to be

informed towards students. find out; b) from the teacher as the only source of learning to

learning based on various learning resources; c) from a textual approach to a process as a

strengthening of the use of a scientific approach; d) from content-based learning to

competency-based learning; e) from partial learning to integrated learning; f) from

learning that emphasizes a single answer to learning with answers that are

multidimensional in truth; g) from verbalism learning to applicative skills; h)

improvement and balance between physical skills (hard skills) and mental skills (soft

skills); i) learning that prioritizes the culture and empowerment of students as lifelong

learners; j) learning that applies values by giving examples (ing ngarso sung tulodo),

building will (ing madyo mangun karso), and developing students' creativity in the

learning process (tut wuri handayani); k) learning that takes place at home, at schools,

and in the community; l) learning that applies the principle that anyone is a teacher,

anyone is a student, and anywhere is a class; m) Use of information and communication

technology to increase the efficiency and effectiveness of learning; and n) recognition of

the individual differences and cultural backgrounds of learners.

Psychological Well-being has an underlying factors namely, positive relations

with others, environmental mastery, and personal growth. It is the student’s level of

satisfaction, feelings and accomplishment. But it seems that this levels of factors during

online education in new normal doesn’t meet those satisfactions.


34

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter includes research design, the population and sampling techniques, the

research procedure, the research instrument, and statistical treatment used.

Research Design

The researchers used the correlational method of research with a self – made

questionnaire as an instrument because they wanted to know if The Online Education in

New Normal has significant relationship on the student’s psychological well-being of

students who’s taking distance learning in terms of online education.

A correlational research design measures a relationship between two variables

without the researcher controlling either of them. It aims to find out whether there is

either: Positive correlation. Both variables change in the same direction.

Sampling Technique

The population is the College Students who are taking Online Classes. The

researchers used cluster sampling to get the sample size suited for the study. This was

used in this study to ensure a more accurate prediction might have resulted.

The Population is divided by three clusters which is the year level of the students,

namely 1st, 2nd and 3rd year college students at Laguna State Polytechnic University Sta.

Cruz Campus.
35

The method of cluster sampling or area sampling can be used in such situations.

In cluster sampling - divide the whole population into clusters according to some well-

defined rule.

Table 1. Distribution of Respondents in terms of Year Level

YEAR LEVEL (CLUSTERS) SAMPLE SIZE

First Year Students 20

Second Year Students 30

Third Year Students 150

Total 200

The sample in the study is composed of two hundred (200) students of Laguna

State Polytechnic University, Sta. Cruz Campus. Twenty (20) students from 1st year level,

Thirty (30) students from 2nd year level and One hundred fifty (150) students from third

year level.

Research Instrument

The researchers used the self-made questionnaire to measure the relationship of

online education in New Normal and Students Psychological Well-being. Utilizing the

online platform, via Google form to do the survey and distribute it to the respondents.

The respondent’s reaction on the online education in the new normal and their

state of psychological well-being. The researchers used the Coefficient Alpha to measure
36

the reliability of the self-made questionnaire and must exceed the value of alpha 0.6 to

prove that the reliability of the questionnaire is acceptable

Instrument has undergone pre testing to 15 respondents to measure its validity

and reliability, It was found that the computed Coefficient Alpha of the instrument with

measuring the variables: Online Education: Teachers Effectiveness (0.80), Internet

Connection (0.93), Learning Environment (0.80), and Psychological Well-being:

Environmental Mastery (0.69), Personal Growth (0.78), and Positive Relations with

Others (0.66) which concluded that it was reliable to use for conducting the study.

The instrument measures six latent constructs namely “Teacher’s Effectiveness”,

“Internet Connection”, “Learning Environment”, “Environmental Mastery”, “Personal

Growth”, and “Positive Relations with Others”. These refer to their reaction on the online

education in the new normal and their state of psychological well-being. Each of the first

two constructs consists of seven (7) reflective indicators and each of the 3rd to 6th

constructs consist of five (5) reflective indicators measured in a scale of 1 to 5 with 1 as

"strongly disagree" and 5 as "strongly agree".

Table 2

Composite Reliability Statistics

Latent construct Composite reliability Recommended value

Teacher’s Effectiveness 0.934 ≥0.7

Internet Connection 0.939 ≥0.7

Learning Environment 0.916 ≥0.7

Environmental Mastery 0.880 ≥0.7

Personal Growth 0.919 ≥0.7

Positive Relations with Others 0.892 ≥0.7


37

The composite reliabilities were also calculated and shown in Table 2. The

composite scores of all the factors are within the recommended value suggesting that the

items have relatively high internal consistency. It means that the instrument has a strong

validity.

Data Collection and Analysis

In order to gather the data the researchers used online platform with google form

to distribute the questionnaires and conduct the survey to collect the information needed

to answer the main problem and support the study’

The researchers used, mean, standard deviation and Structural Equation

Modeling as statistical tools, for the overall average of the students’ responses on

questions given.

Mean to get the average or central value of the level of Psychological Well-

being of the respondents in terms of the Online Education in New Normal. In this study

the mean is used to determine the average of each indicator and to formulate the overall

calculated mean.

Standard Deviation to measure the dispersion of a data set relative to its mean. In

this study used to determine how estimations for a group of observations are spread out

from the mean (average or expected value).

In this study the structural equation modeling was used to determine the

relationship of online education and psychological well-being of the students in new

normal. To determine if each variables is statistically significant into each other.


38

Figure 2 shows the path diagram used in performing higher order confirmatory factor

analysis.

Figure 2. Path Diagram for Higher Order Confirmatory Factor Analysis


39

Chapter 4

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter consists of the presentation, analysis and interpretation of data. The

findings were tallied, tabulated and analyzed. The following data were interpreted by

using tables and figures to give light and better understanding on the results of the study.

Table 3
Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Teacher’s
Effectiveness

Indicator M SD Extent of
manifestation

A1. Teachers are able to help the students to 3.99 0.84 Strong
learn with the given drills (quizzes, seat
works, assignments, etc.).

A2. Teachers provide us feedback on our 3.71 0.98 Strong


strengths and weaknesses on our
subject.

A3. Acknowledges emotion expressed by 3.67 0.94 Strong


students.

A4. Gives enough time to finish the task and 4.10 0.92 Strong
quizzes.

A5. They don’t pressure the students to be 3.96 0.99 Strong


smart and strive harder.

A6. Encourages students to explore new 4.10 0.88 Strong


concepts on the topic discussed.

A7. Helps to acknowledge the talents and 3.94 0.90 Strong


skills of the students.

Overall 3.92 0.93 Strong

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-3.49=Moderate,
1.50-2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
40

The Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Teacher’s

Effectiveness is shown in Table 3. The entire mean of the indicators shows strong extent

of manifestation as well as the overall mean of 3.92 with a standard deviation of 0.93 it

means that teacher’s effectiveness has a strong effect in student’s online education during

new normal. The instructors were innovative and can adapt easily in this new form of

education in new normal. They can easily provide what the students’ needs and support.

In accordance, teachers in an online setting were motivated, innovative, and

valued online learning opportunities because they appreciated the opportunity to work

one-on-one with students and make a positive impact on their academic progress.

(Archambault et. Al, 2014).

Table 4

Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Internet Connection

Indicator M SD Extent of manifestation

B1. I have a stable internet connection at home / Data 3.39 0.94 Moderate
connection.

B2. I am able to access in online class on time. 3.72 0.93 Strong

B3. I can get the activities posted in google classroom through 4.02 0.88 Strong
downloading it by internet connection/ data connection.

B4. I can follow the discussion without any interruption. 3.41 0.90 Moderate

B5. I can answer the exams, quizzes and activities without any 3.35 0.97 Moderate
interruption in internet connection.

B6. I can easily access videos posted that needs to watch online. 3.57 0.93 Strong

B7. I can access the internet regularly and adequately at home. 3.57 0.95 Strong

Overall 3.58 0.95 Strong

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-3.49=Moderate, 1.50-
2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
41

Table 4 presents the Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of

Internet Connection. B1 ( � = 3.39, � = 0.94) , B4 � = 3.41, � = 0.90) and B5 � =

3.35, � = 0.97) show a moderate extent of manifestation, and the rest of the indicators

have strong extent of manifestation. The overall mean of 3.58 and standard deviation of

0.95 present a strong extent of manifestation on the level of online education of the

respondents in terms of internet connection. Internet connection is one of the major needs

of the students during this new normal in their online education, it states that the students

can easily access and has a strong internet connection to finish their task on time.

In contradictory, there were 66.7%ofstudents having an internet connection at

their home but with an unstable signal while 33.3% did not have internet access. Such

conditions were common in the least-developed region because of its limited

infrastructures and public facilities (Agung, 2019).

Table 5

Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Learning Environment

Indicator M SD Extent of
manifestation

C1. I have my own space at home for online class. 3.38 1.21 Moderate

C2. I have a peaceful learning environment at home. 3.22 1.12 Moderate

C3. The level of lighting in my study area allows me to have 3.54 0.91 Strong
visual comfort when taking online classes.

C4. The ventilation in my study area is appropriate for taking online 3.48 0.93 Moderate
class.

C5. I have my privacy in my study when taking classes online. 3.31 1.10 Moderate

Overall 3.38 1.06 Moderate

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-3.49=Moderate, 1.50-
2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
42

The Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Learning

Environment is presented in Table 5. It has an overall mean of 3.38 and standard

deviation of 1.06 and interpreted as moderate extent of manifestation. It means that the

learning environment of the students in this new normal some of the students have a

comfortable environment in their home while some didn’t during the online classes in

New Normal.

In alignment, the researcher conducted a case study about the importance of

creating a sense of community in a student’s online learning environment. The purpose of

the study was to determine how online teachers utilized communication, technology, and

instructional strategies to create a positive rapport with their students. Findings from the

interviews showed that trust, interdependence, and feelings of connectedness played an

important role in student persistence in a student’s online learning environment. (Pope,

2013).

Table 6

Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Environmental Mastery

Indicator M SD Extent of
manifestation

D1. I can control the noise level in my study area (opening/closing 3.05 1.15 Moderate
doors/windows).

D2. I enjoy being in new situations that require me to change my 3.40 0.86 Moderate
old familiar ways of doing things.

D3. I have been able to build a living environment and a lifestyle 3.63 0.82 Strong
for myself that is much to my liking.

D4. I fit very well with other students around me. 3.49 0.82 Moderate

D5. I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily 3.51 0.90 Strong
life.

Overall 3.41 0.94 Moderate

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-3.49=Moderate, 1.50-
2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
43

The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of

Environmental Mastery has an overall mean of 3.41, standard deviation of 0.94 and

interpreted as Moderate extent of manifestation. These results are shown in Table 6. This

means that environmental mastery plays a role in the psychological well-being of

students in online education during this new normal. It states that the student’s

environmental mastery in online education in new normal can’t easily adapt or making

small adaptive changes in the new environment and it can say that they’re still on

adjustment phase.

This ability to choose or create an environment that best supports one’s

psychological condition is also reflective of one’s autonomy and provides one with a

sense of control regarding the world he or she experiences. However, feeling that one’s

experiences are outside his or her control may prevent individuals from making small

adaptive changes within the environment (Wang et al., 2015).

Table 7

Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Personal Growth

Indicator M SD Extent of
manifestation

E1. I enjoy making plans for the future and working to 4.26 0.93 Strong
make them a reality.

E2. I always try to make big improvements or changes in 4.11 0.93 Strong
my life.

E3. I think it is important to have new experiences that 4.36 0.83 Strong
challenge how you think about yourself and the world.

E4. I have the sense that I have developed a lot as a person 4.08 0.91 Strong
over time.

E5. People would describe me as a giving person, willing to 4.04 0.88 Strong
share my time with others.

Overall 4.17 0.90 Strong

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-
3.49=Moderate, 1.50-2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
44

The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Personal

Growth is shown in Table 7. The entire mean of the indicators shows strong extent of

manifestation as well as the overall mean of 4.17 with a standard deviation of 0.90. It

means that the student’s capacity, ability and effort to finish their task and to study

comfortably even they are working alone and without peer support personally. It states

that the students can be independent even in this kind situation on their studies.

Connecting students in non-traditional learning environments presents a

challenge to the school and creates a unique opportunity for the school to consider new

types of technology as a solution like Google Classroom. While the use of technology to

connect high performing students even they are working alone (Ng and Nicholas, 2010).

Table 8.

Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Positive Relations with


Others

Indicator M SD Extent of
manifestation

F1. Most people see me as loving and 3.75 0.97 Strong


affectionate.

F2. Maintaining close relationships has been 3.55 0.96 Strong


easy me.

F3. I know that I can trust my friends, and they 4.41 0.90 Strong
know they can trust me.

F4. I know that I can easily get along to people 3.70 0.98 Strong
who are new to me.

F5. I always experienced many warm and trusting 3.91 0.89 Strong
relationships with others.

Overall 3.81 0.96 Strong

Note. N=200. The mean is interpreted as follows: 4.50-5.00=Very strong, 3.50-4.49=Strong, 2.50-
3.49=Moderate, 1.50-2.49=Weak, 1.00-1.49=Very weak.
45

The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Positive

Relations with Others is shown in Table 8. The entire mean of the indicators shows

strong extent of manifestation as well as the overall mean of 3.91 with a standard

deviation of 0.96. It shows that the positive relations with others is important in this kind

of situation and plays a role on psychological wellbeing of the students. It means that

relations and communications is matter even virtually.

The findings of the study suggest that students perceive instructor-learner and

learner-content interaction to be more important to their learning as compared to learner-

learner interaction. In addition, teaching presence plays a more important role in student

learning followed by cognitive presence and then social presence. Again, when it comes

to the combination of the factors of interaction and presence, the factors that students

perceive to have the most influence on their learning are teaching presence and learner-

instructor interaction with the least important factor being learner-learner interaction.

Overall, the results of this empirical study have implications for online course design and

delivery to ensure student learning in online environments. ( Blanks, 2019).


46

The Structural Equation Model

Structural equation modeling was conducted to analyze the relationship between

the Online Education in New Normal and Students Psychological Well-being. The

original model shown in the conceptual framework was estimated and found to be a good

fit to the data (Figure 2). The fit measures shown in Table 9 are within the recommended

values.

Table 9
Model Fit Measures

Measure Value Recommended value

CFI 0.8860 ≥ .85

TLI 0.8760 ≥ .80

SRMR 0.0761 < 0.08

RMSEA 0.0710 < 0.08

The path covariance’s or correlation coefficients are shown in Table 19. The coefficients

involving indicator variables were no longer reported.

Table 10
Covariance’s

Path Estimate S.E. C.R. p

Environmental Teachers
<---> .022 .022 1.021 .307
Mastery Effectiveness

Personal Teachers
<---> .152 .032 4.763 <.001
Growth Effectiveness
47
To be continued…
Positive Teachers
<---> .227 .039 5.798 <.001
Relations Effectiveness

Environmental
<---> Internet Connection .181 .036 5.000 <.001
Mastery

Personal
<---> Internet Connection .297 .048 6.238 <.001
Growth

Positive
<---> Internet Connection -.260 .044 -5.193 <.001
Relations

Environmental Learning
<---> .429 .072 5.972 <.001
Mastery Environment

Personal Learning
<---> -.214 .043 -4.934 <.001
Growth Environment

Positive Learning
<---> .248 .047 5.273 <.001
Relations Environment

Note. Path coefficients involving indicator variables are not shown.

We observe from Table 10 the following.

Teacher’s effectiveness has no statistically significant relationship (β=0.022,

p=.307) with the student’s environmental mastery. It means that the two variables don’t

have any relationship into each other. While teacher’s effectiveness has a statistically

significant relationship (β=0.152, p<.001) with the student’s personal growth. And

teacher’s effectiveness has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.227, p<.001) with

the student’s positive relations with others. It means those variables can caused by

something other than chance and it is really exist.

Internet connection has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.181, p<.001)

with the student’s environmental mastery. And internet connection has a statistically

significant relationship (β=0.297, p<.001) with the student’s personal growth. It means
48

that those variables can caused by something other than chance and it is really exist.

While the internet connection has a statistically significant negative relationship (β=-.260,

p<.001) with the student’s positive relations with others. It can state that those variables

can mislead into some factors and didn’t relate into each other.

Learning environment has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.429, p<.001)

with the student’s environmental mastery. Also learning environment has a statistically

significant relationship (β=0.248, p<.001) with the student’s positive relations with others.

It can state that those variables might have a relationship into each other without

assuming and it is truly existing. While learning environment has a statistically

significant negative relationship (β=-.214, p<.001) with the student’s personal growth. It

means that it can be misleading.


49

Chapter 5

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter presents the summary of findings, conclusion and recommendation based on

findings.

Summary

The essence of this study was to determine the relationship between the Online

Education and Psychological Well-being of the students from freshmen to junior level at

Laguna State Polytechnic University Santa Cruz Main Campus, Santa Cruz Laguna.

The correlational method of research was used in order to gather the data needed

for this study together with the sources of information for an accurate interpretation of the

findings.

To collect the essential data or information, authorization from the the perspective

persons was asked in order to carry out this study. Upon approval of the request, the

researchers gave self-made questionnaires to the freshmen up to junior students of

Laguna State Polytechnic University Santa Cruz Main Campus, Santa Cruz Laguna. The

responses from the students were recorded, computed and analyzed. The statistical

methods used to compute the data were: (1) mean, (2) standard deviation, (3) factor

analysis, (EFA/ CFA) (4) Structural Equation Modeling.


50

Findings

Based on the data gathered, different findings are hereby presented.

1.1 The Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Teacher’s

Effectiveness

The study found out that the level of Online Education in terms of Teachers

Effectiveness is all of the mean of the indicators shows “strong extent of manifestation”

as well as the overall mean of 3.92 with a standard deviation of 0.93.

1.2 The Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Internet

Connection

The study found out that the level of Online Education in terms of Internet

Connection is B1 ( � = 3.39, � = 0.94) , B4 � = 3.41, � = 0.90) and B5 � = 3.35, � =

0.97) show a “moderate extent of manifestation”, and the rest of the indicators have

“strong extent of manifestation”. The overall mean of 3.58 and standard deviation of

0.95 present a strong extent of manifestation on the level of online education of the

respondents in terms of internet connection.

1.3 The Level of Online Education of the respondents in terms of Learning

Environment

On the other hand, the level of online education in terms of learning environment

has an overall mean of 3.38 and standard deviation of 1.06 and interpreted as “moderate

extent of manifestation”.
51

2.1 The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of

Environmental Mastery

The study found out that the level of Psychological Well-being in terms of

Environmental Mastery has an overall mean of 3.41, standard deviation of 0.94 and

interpreted as “moderate extent of manifestation”.

2.2 The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Personal

Growth

The study found out that the level of Psychological Well-being in terms of

Personal Growth is all of the mean of the indicators shows “strong extent of

manifestation” as well as the overall mean of 4.17 with a standard deviation of 0.90.

2.3 The Level of Psychological Well-being of the respondents in terms of Positive

Relations with Others

On the other hand, the level of Psychological Well-being in terms of Positive

relations with others is all of the mean of the indicators shows “strong extent of

manifestation” as well as the overall mean of 3.91 with a standard deviation of 0.96.

3. The Relationship of Online Education and Psychological Well-being of the

Students

The relationship of Online Education and Psychological well-being of the

students based on the indicators of each variables are the following: Teacher’s

effectiveness has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.260, p<.001) with the

student’s environmental mastery. Teacher’s effectiveness has a statistically significant

relationship (β=0.744, p<.001) with the student’s personal growth. Teacher’s

effectiveness has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.672, p<.001) with the


52

student’s positive relations with others. Internet connection has no statistically

significant relationship (β=-.032, p=.692) with the student’s environmental mastery.

Internet connection has no statistically significant relationship (β=-.111, p=.281) with the

student’s personal growth. Internet connection has statistically significant negative

relationship (β=-.210, p=.044) with the student’s positive relations with others. Learning

environment has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.582, p<.001) with the

student’s environmental mastery. Learning environment has a statistically significant

relationship (β=0.152, p=0.044) with the student’s personal growth. Learning

environment has a statistically significant relationship (β=0.267, p<.001) with the

student’s positive relations with others.

Conclusion

Based on the findings, the following were drawn.

1. The level of Online Education of most respondents is “strong extent of

manifestation” specifically the teacher’s effectiveness and internet connection, whereas

the learning environment is “moderate extent of manifestation”.

2. The level of Psychological Well-being of most of the respondents in the study

particularly the personal growth and positive relations with others is “strong extent of

manifestation”, compare to the environmental mastery which is “moderate extent of

manifestation”.

3. The result showed that there is a significant relationship between the online education

and psychological well-being. Thus, the null hypothesis is rejected.


53

Recommendation

In light of conclusions drawn from the findings, the recommendations of the study were

as follows:

1. In the future, the demographic profile in terms of Age, Gender and Social Status need

to be surveyed. Future research would benefit from surveying those factors, because it

can give another result and interpretation or it can distinguish if that kind of demographic

profile can have relation or attributes to other factors.

2. It’s highly suggested that the students should know their limitations when it comes to

studying, neither traditionally or virtual. Because unhealthy pattern of study habits might

affect their well-being.

3. Future researchers might try to improve the instrument that used to gather the data.

Utilized the right appropriate choices of words and can add a couple of numbers as

indicators and can utilize the six scales of categories by Carol Ryff..

4. Furthermore, the researchers suggested to Universities and institutions in higher

education that they should promote online mindfulness intervention or conducting

seminars or webinars with the topic related to help the instructors, students, parents and

individuals to balance their psychological well-being during online education in new

normal.
54

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. Journals, Articles and Periodicals

Akemp, E. Palmer, P. Strelan. (2019). A taxonomy of factors affecting attitudes towards


educational technologies for use with technology acceptance models. British
Journal Education Technology, 50 (2019), pp. 2394-2413.
Agung, ASN. (2019). Current Challenges in Teaching English in Least-developed Re
gion in Indonesia. Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora. [Journal of Social Sciences and
Humanities], Volume 9(3), 266-271.Aparicio, M., Bacao, F., & Olivera.
Arbaugh, J.B. (2013). Does academic discipline moderate CoI course outcomes r
elationships in online MBA courses? Internet and Higher Education, 17, 16-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.10.002.
Arwen, D. (2020). Student Learning Motivation Influences The Development Of The
Corona Virus Pandemic (COVID 19) International Journal of Advanced Science
and TechnologyVol. 29, No. 9s, (2020), pp. 4911-4925
Baran, E., Correia, A.P., & Thompson, A.D. (2013). Tracing successful online
teaching in higher education: Voices of exemplary online teachers. Teachers
College Record, 115(3), 1-41.
Brazendale, K., Beets, M. W., Weaver, R. G., Pate, R. R., Turner-McGrievy, G. M.,
Kaczynski, A. T., Hippel, P. T. (2017). Understanding differences between
summer vs. school obesogenic behaviors of children: the structured days
hypothesis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity,
14(1), 100.
Chaney E. G. (2010). Web-based instruction in a Rural High School: A Collaborative
Inquiry into Its Effectiveness and Desirability. NASSP Bulletin, 85(628), 20-35.
Cleveland-Innes, M., & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning, and the
online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and
Distributed Learning, 13(4), 269-292.
Cox-Davenport, R.A. (2014). A grounded theory of faculty’s use of humanization to
create online course climate. Journal of Holistic Nursing, 32(1), 16-24. doi:
10.1177/0898010113499201.
Dhir, A., Yossatorn, Y., Kaur, P., & Chen, S. (2018). Online social media fatigueand
psychological wellbeing—A study of compulsive use, fear of missing out, fatigue,
anxiety and depression. International Journal of Information Management, 40,
141–152
55

Diemer, J. E., Alpers, G. W., Peperkorn, H. M., Shiban, Y., & Muhlberger, A.
(2015). The impact of perception and presence on emotional reactions: A review
of research in virtual reality. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 26.
Flett, G. L., & Zangeneh, M. (2020). Mattering as a vital support for people during the
COVID-19 pandemic: The benefits of feeling and knowing that someone cares
during times of crisis. Journal of Concurrent Disorders, 2,106–123.
Garrison, D.R., Cleveland-Innes, M., & Fung, T.S. (2010). Exploring causal
relationships among teaching, cognitive, and social presence: Student perceptions
of the community of inquiry framework. Internet & Higher Education, 13(1-2), 31-
36. doi: 10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.002.
Heckel, T. Ringeisen. (2019). Pride and anxiety in online learning environments:
Achievement emotions as mediators between learners' characteristics and
learning outcomes. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35 (2019), pp. 667-
677.
Hermawan, S., & Tyas, F. I. W. N. (2018). Pengaruh Nilai Intrinsik, Parental Influence,
dan Persepsi Mahasiswa Dengan Pendekatan Teori Karier Anne Roe Terhadap
Pemilihan Karir Sebagai Akuntan Publik Bagi Mahasiswa Akuntansi Universitas
Airlangga Surabaya. JABE (Journal of Applied Business and Economic), 5(2),
12–129.
Ho, C. S., Chee, C. Y., & Ho, R. C. (2020). Mental health strategies to combat the
psychological impact of COVID-19 beyond paranoia and panic. Annals of the
Academy of Medicine Singapore, 49(3), 155–160.
Hung, M.-L., Chou, C., & Chen, C.-H. (2010). Learner readiness for online learning:
Scale development and student perceptions. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1080-
1090. J. Lee. Mental health effects of school closures during COVID-19 The
Lancet Child & Adolescent Health, 4 (6) (2020).
Kaufmann, R., Sellnow, D.D., & Frisby, B.N. (2015). The development and validation
of the online learning climate scale (OLCS), Communication Education, 1-15. doi:
10.1080/03634523.2015.1101778.
Keyes, G. (2010). Teaching the scientific method in the social sciences. The Journal of
Effective Teaching, 10(2), 18–28.
Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E. & Donnelly, H. (2019). Establishing the Importance of
Interaction and Presence to Student Learning in Online Environments. Journal of
Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 539-560.
Liu, Q. W., Zhao, G. Z., Ji, B., Liu, Y. T., Zhang, J., Mou, Q., & Shi, T. (2020).
Analysis of the influence of the psychology changes of fear induced by the
COVID-19 epidemic on the Body. World Journal of Acupuncture–Moxibustion,
30(2), 85–89.
56

Oswal, S. K., & Meloncon, L. (2014). Paying Attention to Accessibility When Designing
Online Courses in Technical and Professional Communication. Journal of
Business and Technical Communication, 28(3) 271-300. Doi: 1050651914524780.
Periathiruvadi, S., & Rinn, A. N. (2012). Technology in gifted education: A review of
best practices and empirical research. Journal of Research on Technology in
Education, 45(2), 153-169.
Perikos, I., & Hatzilygeroudis, I. (2013). Recognizing emotion presence in natural
language sentences. In Engineering Applications of Neural Networks (pp. 30-39).
Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Pope, C. (2013). Digital distance learning communities: Teachers' beliefs about
community in K-12 online education (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). State
University of New Jersey, Rutgers.
Sahu, P. (2020). Closure of universities due to coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19):
Impact on education and mental health of students and academic staf. Cureus,
12(4), e7541.
Savenye, W.C. (2010). Improving Online Courses: What is Interaction and Why Use It?
(Undetermined). Distance Learning, 2(6), 22-28.
Sharp, J., & Theiler, S. (2018). A review of psychological distress among university
students: Pervasiveness, implications and potential points of intervention.
International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 40(3), 193–212.
Shea, P., Vickers, J., & Hayes, S. (2010). Online instructional effort measured through
the lens of teaching presence in the community of inquiry framework: A re-
examination of measures and approach. International Review of Research in
Open and Distance Learning, 11(3), 127-154.
Thomson, L. D. (2010). Beyond the Classroom Walls: Teachers’ and Students’
Perspectives on How Online Learning Can Meet the Needs of Gifted Students.
Journal ofAdvancedAcademics,21(4),662-712.
Utunen, H., Ngouille, N., Piroux, C., George, R., Attias, M., & Gamhewage, G.
(2020). Global reach of an online COVID-19 course in multiple languages on
open WHO in the first quarter of 2020: Analysis of platform use data. Journal of
Medical Internet Research, 22(4), 1–13.
Wang, Z. H., Yang, H. L., Yang, Y. Q., Liu, D., Li, Z. H., Zhang, X. R., . . . & Wang,
X. M. (2020). Prevalence of anxiety and depression symptom; and the demands
for psychological knowledge and interventions in college students during COVID-
19 epidemic: A large cross-sectional study. Journal of Affective Disorders,
275(10), 188–193.
Wang, M-C., Nyutu, P. N., Tran, K. K., Spears, A. (2015). Finding resilience: The
mediation effect of sense of community on the psychological well-being of military
57

spouses. Journal of Mental Health Counseling, 37(2), 164-174.


doi:10.17744/mehc.37.2.07054x61448
Whelan, E., Islam, A. K. M. N., & Brooks, S. (2020). Is boredom proneness related to
social media overload and fatigue? A stress–strain–outcome approach. Internet
Research, 30(3), 869–887.
Xiao, C. (2020). A novel approach of consultation on 2019 novel coronavirus (COVID-
19). Related psychological and mental problems: structured letter therapy.
Psychiatry Investigation, 17(2), 175.
Zhang, S., Zhao, L., Lu, Y., & Yang, J. (2016). Do you get tired of socializing? An
empirical explanation of discontinuous usage behaviour in social network
services. Information & Management, 53(7), 904–914.
B.Websites

Adam, T., Kaye, T., & Haßler, B. (2020). The Maldives and Sri Lanka: Question and
Answer Session. (EdTech Hub Helpdesk Response No 18) DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.
3885817. Available under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.
Allen, K., Kern, M. L., Vella-Brodrick, D., Hattie, J., & Waters, L. (2018). What
schools need to know about fostering school belonging: A meta-analysis.
Educational Psychology Review, 30, 1–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10648-016-
9389-8.

Auxier, B,. & Anderson, M. (2020). As schools close due to the coronavirus, some U.S.
students face a digital ‘homework gap’. Retrieved from
https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2020/03/16/as-schools-close-due-to-the-
coronavirus-some-u-s-students-face-a-digital-homework-gap/.

Baticulon, R. E., Alberto, N. R. I., Baron, M. B. C., Mabulay, R. E. C., Rizada, L. G.


T., Sy, J. J., . . . Reyes, J. C. B. (2020). Barriers to online learning in the time of
COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. medRxiv,
2020.2007.2016.20155747. doi: 10.1101/2020.07.16.20155747.

Bernstein, A. G., & Isaac, C. (2018). Critical Thinking Criteria for Evaluating Online
Discussion. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning,
12(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2018.120211 .COVID-19 virtual learning
and education: Social and emotional learning. COVID-19 virtual learning and
education: Social and emotional learning (apa.org)

Desai Saahil, (2020). The Real Lesson Of The College Closures, The Atlantic, March 16
https://www.theatlantic.com/education/archive/2020/03/coronavirus-college-
closuredisaster-students/608095 https://www.edutopia.org/article/covid-19s-
impact-students-academic-and-mental-well-being
58

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/04/coronavirus-education-global-covid19-
online-digital-learning/.

J. Pediatr.LeBlanc, P. (2020). COVID-19 has thrust universities into online


learning⁠ —how should they adapt? Education Plus Development, Brooking.
Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development.
Retrieved from ABC NEWS https://abcnews.go.com/International/global-
impacTcoronaviruseducation/story.
Joosten, T.,& Cusatis, R. (2020). Online learning readiness
https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2020.1726167.

Lederman, D. (March 18, 2020). Will shift to remote teaching be boon or bane for
online learning? Inside Higher Ed. Retrieved from
file:///D:/COVID/Most%20teaching%20is%20going%20remote.%20Will%20that
%20h elp%20or%20hurt%20online%20learning.html.
Moor, M. G., (2020). Q&A: A founder of distance education weighs in on its
educational benefits, University of Wisconsin-Madison News. Retrieved
from: https://news.wisc.edu/qa-a-founder-of-distance-education-weighs-in-on-its-
educational-benefits/.
Römer, K. (2020). COVID-19: A wake-up call to invest in literacy.
https://thelifelonglearningblog.uil.unesco.org/2020/07/21/covid-19-a-wake-up-
call-toinvest-in-literacy/.
Seiver, J. G., & Troja, A. (2014). Satisfaction and success in online learning as a
function of the needs for affiliation, autonomy, and mastery. Distance Education,
35,90–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2014.891427.
Worldometers. (2020). Age, sex, existing conditions of COVID-19 cases and deaths.
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-age-sex-demographics.
Zhong, R. (2020, March 17). The coronavirus exposes education’s digital divide.
Retrieved from The New York Times:
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/03/17/technology/china-schools-coronavirus.html.
C. Published/Unpublished materials
Cao, W., Fang, Z., Hou, G., Han, M., Xu, X., Dong, J., & Zheng, J. (2020). The
psychological impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China.
Psychiatry Research, 112934.

Changwon Son, Alec Smith, Xiaomei Wang, Farzan Sasangoha, Effects of COVID-
19 on College Students’ Mental Health in the United States: Interview Survey
Study (2020)
Daryanto. (2014). Pendekatan pembelajaran saintifik Kurikulum2013. Yogyakarta: Gava
Media.
59

Dodd, R.H.; Dadaczynski, K.; Okan, O.; McCaffery, K.J.; Pickles, K.( 2021).
Psychological Wellbeing and Academic Experience of University Students in
Australia during COVID-19.

Dubey S, Biswas P, Ghosh R, Chatterjee S, Dubey MJ, Chatterjee S, Lahiri D, Lavie


CJ. 2020. Psychosocial impact of COVID‐19. Diabetes Metab Syndr 14: 779–
788.
Fadlillah, M. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 dalam pembelajaran SD/MI,
SMP/MTS, dan SMA/MA. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media.
Farrel et al. (2019). An investigation of effective online teaching: a needs analysis of
online educators and online students, Dublin: #Openteach Project.
Galea, S., Merchant, R. M., & Lurie, N. (2020). The mental health consequences of
COVID19 and physical distancing: The need for prevention and early
intervention. JAMA Internal Medicine.
Gao, J. L., Zheng, P. P., Jia, Y. N., Chen, H., Mao, Y., Chen, S., . . . & Dai, J. (2020).
Mental health problems and social media exposure during COVID-19 outbreak.
Public Library of Science, 15(4), 1–10.
Hasan & Bao, (2020). Impact of “e-Learning crack-up” perception on psychological
distress among college students during COVID-19 pandemic: A mediating role of
“fear of academic year loss”
Hascher, T. (2010). Learning and emotion: perspectives for theory and research.
European Educational Research.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference
between emergency remote teaching and online learning.
J.J. Liu, Y. Bao, X. Huang, J. Shi, L. Lu (2020). Mental health considerations for
children quarantined because of COVID-19.
Kruger-Ross, M. J., & Waters, R. D. (2013). Predicting online learning success:
Applying the situational theory of publics to the virtual classroom. Computers &
Education, 61, 176-184.
Kunandar. (2013). Penilaian autentik: penilaian hasil belajar peserta didik berdasarkan
Kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Lischer, S., Saf, N., Dickson, C. (2020). Remote learning and students’ mental health
during the Covid- 19 pandemic: A mixed- method enquiry.
McCarthy, K. (2020, March 7). The global impact of coronavirus on education.
Newman, F., & Holzman, L. (2013). Lev Vygotsky (classic edition): Revolutionary
scientist. Psychology Press.
Sarsar, F. (2014). The Effectiveness of Emotional Motivational Feedback Messages.
(Doctoral dissertation). Georgia State University, USA.
60

W. Cao, Z. Fang, G. Hou, M. Han, X. Xu, J. Dong, J. Zheng. The psychological


impact of the COVID-19 epidemic on college students in China
W.Y. Jiao, L.N. Wang, J. Liu, S.F. Fang, F.Y. Jiao, M. Pettoello-
Mantovani, E. Somekh. Behavioral and emotional disorders in children during
the OVID-19 epidemic
Williams, S. N., Armitage, C. J., Tampe, T., & Dienes, K. (2020). Public perceptions
and experiences of social distancing and social isolation during the COVID-19
pandemic: A UK-based focus group study.
Yang, H., & Ma, J. (2020). How an epidemic outbreak impacts happiness: Factors that
worsen (vs. protect) emotional well-being during the coronavirus pandemic.
Psychiatry Research
Zandifar A., Badrfam R. (2020). Iranian mental health during the COVID-19 epidemic.
Asian journal of psychiatry.51.
Zhang, W., Wang, Y., Yang, L., & Wang, C. (2020). Suspending classes without
stopping learning: China’s education emergency management policy in the
Covid-19 outbreak. Basel: Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute.
61

APPENDICCES
62

APPENDIX A
INSTRUMENTS/ DATA GATHERING TOOLS

Name (optional): ________________________________


Course: ____________________
Sex (please check the appropriate box):
MALE FEMALE

Age:
DIRECTION: This questionnaire will ask you to respond to a number of statements.
You are asked to read each statement carefully, and then think about whether the
statement applies to you or does not apply to you. Put a check on the corresponding
number that best describes how much you agree with the statement.

A rating scale will be provided to the convenience of your answers:


5- Strongly Agree
4 – Agree
3 – Neither Agree nor Disagree
2 – Disagree
1 – Strongly Disagree

TEACHERS EFFECTIVENESS
(THE INSTRUCTOR)
5 4 3 2 1

1. Teachers are able to help the students


to learn with given drills (quizzes, seat
works, assignment, etc.)

2. Teachers provide us feedback on our


strengths and weaknesses on our
subject.
3. Acknowledges emotion expressed by
students.
4. Gives enough time to finish the task
and quizzes.

5. They don’t pressure the students to be


smart and strive harder.

6. Encourages students to explore new


concepts on the topic discussed.

7. Helps to acknowledge the talents and


skills of students.
63

INTERNET CONNECTION 5 4 3 2 1

1. I have a stable internet connection at


home / Data connection.
2. I am able access in online class on
time.
3. I can get the activities posted in
google classroom through
downloading it by internet
connection/ data connection.
4. I can follow the discussion without
any interruption.
5. I can answer the exams, quizzes and
activities without any interruption in
internet connection.
6. I can easily access to videos posted
that needs to watch online.

7. I can access to internet regular and


adequate at home.

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT 5 4 3 2 1

1. I have my own space at home for


online class.
2. I have peaceful leaning environment
at home.

3. I experience some distractions in my


study area during online class.
4. The level of lightning in my study
area allows me to have visual
comfort when taking online classes.
5. The ventilation in my study area is
appropriate for taking online class

6. I have my privacy in my study when


taking classes online.
7. I can control the noise level in my
study area (opening/closing
doors/windows.
64

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTERY 5 4 3 2 1
1. I feel I am in charge of the situation
in which I live.
2. I enjoy being in new situations that
require me to change my old familiar
ways of doing things.

3. I have been able to build a living


environment and a lifestyle for
myself that is much to my liking.

4. I fit very well with the people and the


community around me.
5. I am quite good at managing the
many responsibilities of my daily
life.
6. My daily activities often seem trivial
and unimportant to me.

7. I often feel overwhelmed by my


responsibilities.

PERSONAL GROWTH 5 4 3 2 1
1. For me, life has been a
continuous process of learning,
changing, and growth.
2. I enjoy making plans for the
future and working to make
them a reality.
3. In many ways I feel
disappointed about my
achievements in life.
4. I live life one day at a time and
don’t really think about the
future.
5. I always trying to make big
improvements or changes in my
life a long time ago.”
6. I think it is important to have
new experiences that challenge
how you think about yourself
and the world.
7. I have the sense that I have
developed a lot as a person over
time.
65

POSITIVE RELATIONS WITH 5 4 3 2 1


OTHERS
1. People would describe me
as a giving person, willing
to share my time with
others.
2. Most people see me as
loving and affectionate.
3. I tend to worry about what
other people think of me.
4. Maintaining close
relationships has been easy
me.
5. I know that I can trust my
friends, and they know they
can trust me.
6. I know that I can easily get
along to people who’s new
to me.
7. I always experienced many
warm and trusting
relationships with others.

RESEARCH INSTRUMENT DATA MATRIX

TEACHER’S EFFECTIVENESS
Variable
Indicator
Name
Teachers are able to help the students to learn with the given drills
A1
(quizzes, seat works, assignments, etc.).

A2 Teachers provide us feedback on our strengths and weaknesses on


our subject.
A3 Acknowledges emotion expressed by students.
A4 Gives enough time to finish the task and quizzes.
A5
They don’t pressure the students to be smart and strive harder.
A6 Encourages students to explore new concepts on the topic
discussed.
A7 Helps to acknowledges the talents and skills of the students.
66

INTERNET CONNECTION
Variable Name Indicator
B1 I have a stable internet connection at home / Data connection.
B2 I am able to access in online class on time.
B3 I can get the activities posted in google classroom through
downloading it by internet connection/ data connection.
B4 I can follow the discussion without any interruption.
B5 I can answer the exams, quizzes and activities without any
interruption in internet connection.
B6
I can easily access videos posted that needs to be watched online.
B7 I can access the internet regularly and adequately at home.

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT
Variable Name Indicator
C1 I have my own space at home for online class.
C2 I have a peaceful learning environment at home.
C3 The level of lighting in my study area allows me to have visual
comfort when taking online classes.
C4 The ventilation in my study area is appropriate for taking online
class
C5 I have my privacy in my study when taking classes online.

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTERY
Variable Name Indicator
I can control the noise level in my study area (opening/closing
D1
doors/windows).

D2 I enjoy being in new situations that require me to change my old


familiar ways of doing things.
D3 I have been able to build a living environment and a lifestyle for
myself that is much to my liking.
D4 I fit very well with other students around me.
D5 I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily
life.
67

PERSONAL GROWTH
Variable Name Indicator

E1 I can control the noise level in my study area (opening/closing


doors/windows).
E2 I enjoy being in new situations that require me to change my old
familiar ways of doing things.
E3 I have been able to build a living environment and a lifestyle for
myself that is much to my liking.
E4 I fit very well with other students around me.
E5 I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily
life.

POSITIVE RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHERS


Variable Name Indicator
I can control the noise level in my study area (opening/closing
E1
doors/windows).

E2 I enjoy being in new situations that require me to change my old


familiar ways of doing things.
E3 I have been able to build a living environment and a lifestyle for
myself that is much to my liking.
E4 I fit very well with other students around me.
E5 I am quite good at managing the many responsibilities of my daily
life.

Global Goodness-of-fit
It shows the measurement recommendations of global fit for models estimated based on

Kline, Byrne, Kriston, Hu, Browne and Schermelleh‐Engel. CFI (comparative-fit index)

≥0.85, TLI (Tucker-Lewis index) ≥0.80, SRMR (standardised root mean square residual)

≤0.08 and RMSEA (root mean square error of approximation) ≤0.08 suggest the

thresholds for acceptable fit. CFI (comparative-fit index) ≥0.95, TLI (Tucker-Lewis

index) ≥0.95, SRMR (standardised root mean square residual) ≤0.05 and RMSEA (root

mean square error of approximation) ≤0.05 suggest the thresholds for good fit.
68

Measures of global fit for models estimated


CFI TLI SRMR RMSEA
Thresholds for
≥0.85 ≥0.80 ≤0.08 ≤0.08
acceptable fit
Thresholds for
≥0.95 ≥0.95 ≤0.05 ≤0.05
good fit

Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA)

During the Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), the number of factors extracted was ,

based on parallel analysis and factor loadings less than 0.3 were suppressed. The results

of the final stage of EFA are shown.

It shows that the indicators load on four different factors. Indicators with factor loadings

less than but very near the recommended cut-off value of 0.4 were not removed.

Indicators C1 to C5 and D1 to D5 load to only one factor. Indicators E1 to E5 and F1 to

F5 also load to only one factor.

The Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.93275, above the

commonly recommended value of 0.6. Bartlett’s test of sphericity was also significant

(χ2(561) = 4799.846, p < .001). Given these overall indicators, factor analysis was

deemed to be suitable.
69

Factor Loading's
Factor
1 2 3 4 Uniqueness
A1 0.74546 0.37366
A2 0.70499 0.44184
A3 0.78189 0.38374
A4 0.75282 0.42971
A5 0.67991 0.43844
A6 0.77933 0.32098
A7 0.86859 0.27681
B1 0.73239 0.42449
B2 0.83812 0.2697
B3 0.68541 0.45172
B4 0.58353 0.39341
B5 0.65219 0.3402
B6 0.81261 0.26811
B7 0.86522 0.23233
C1 0.71730 0.43571
C2 0.81677 0.3312
C3 0.57418 0.46831
C4 0.63926 0.41863
C5 0.81485 0.38606
D1 0.83439 0.46244
D2 0.66421 0.52204
D3 0.55259 0.51462

D4 0.56672 0.51571
D5 0.57103 0.51471
E1 0.72531 0.38832
E2 0.72569 0.39472
E3 0.70914 0.46149
E4 0.76720 0.42459
E5 0.92315 0.31000
F1 0.71201 0.41733
F2 0.43917 0.64368
F3 0.70897 0.47855
F4 0.70752 0.52268
F5 0.72789 0.45018
Note. 'Maximum likelihood' extraction method was used in combination with a 'promax' rotation
70

It shows the consistency reliability statistics. The Cronbach's alpha coefficients are all

above the recommended value of 0.7 showing the instrument to reach acceptable

reliability.

Scale Reliability Statistics


Latent construct Cronbach’s Recommended
α value
Teacher’s Effectiveness 0.917 ≥0.7
Internet Connection 0.923 ≥0.7
Learning Environment 0.885 ≥0.7
Environmental Mastery 0.832 ≥0.7
Personal Growth 0.890 ≥0.7
Positive Relations with Others 0.849 ≥0.7

Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA)

As shown in the confirmatory factor analysis also showed an acceptable model fit. All of

the reported fit measures are within the recommended values.

Model Fit Measures

Measure Value Recommended value

CFI 0.902 ≥ 0.85

TLI 0.893 ≥ 0.80

SRMR 0.065 < 0.08

RMSEA 0.066 < 0.08


71

The composite reliabilities were also calculated and shown. The composite scores of all

the factors are within the recommended value suggesting that the items have relatively

high internal consistency.


72

APPENDIX B
LETTERS

Republic of the Philippines


Laguna State Polytechnic University
Santa Cruz, Campus
College of Arts and Sciences

March ___, 2021

Dear Sir/Madame,

Good Day!

We are the third-year student of Bachelor of Science in Psychology section 3A.


We sincerely ask for your assistance for validation of questionnaires in our thesis entitled
"THE ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
IN NEW NORMAL".

Its purpose is to aim the student’s situations, feeling, thoughts and emotions,
During the Online Education in New Normal. And the relationship of this in the student’s
psychological well-being.

We are looking forward for your response about this matter. Thank you very
much and God bless.
Very Sincerely,

GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN

MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO


Researchers

Noted by:

EIREEN C. AGOR, Ed.D.


Signature over Printed Name
73

Republic of the Philippines


Laguna State Polytechnic University
Santa Cruz, Campus
College of Arts and Sciences

March 25, 2021

Dear Sir/Madame,

Good Day!

We are the third-year student of Bachelor of Science in Psychology section 3A.


We sincerely ask for your assistance for validation of questionnaires in our thesis entitled
"THE ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
IN NEW NORMAL".

Its purpose is to aim the student’s situations, feeling, thoughts and emotions,
During the Online Education in New Normal. And the relationship of this in the student’s
psychological well-being.

We are looking forward for your response about this matter. Thank you very
much and God bless.
Very Sincerely,

GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN

MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO


Researchers

Noted by:

EDEN V. ARENAS,
Signature over Printed Name
74

Republic of the Philippines


Laguna State Polytechnic University
Santa Cruz, Campus
College of Arts and Sciences

March 19, 2021

Dear Sir/Madame,

Good Day!

We are the third-year student of Bachelor of Science in Psychology section 3A.


We sincerely ask for your assistance for validation of questionnaires in our thesis entitled
"THE ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING
IN NEW NORMAL".

Its purpose is to aim the student’s situations, feeling, thoughts and emotions,
During the Online Education in New Normal. And the relationship of this in the student’s
psychological well-being.

We are looking forward for your response about this matter. Thank you very
much and God bless.
Very Sincerely,

GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN

MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO


Researchers

Noted by:

LYELLA MAE N. DELGADO, RPm


Signature over Printed Name
75

INFORM CONSENT
Dear Respondents,
We, the undersigned researchers from the Department of Psychology at Laguna State
Polytechnic University- Sta. Cruz Campus are conducting a study entitled “THE
ONLINE EDUCATION: STUDENTS PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL-BEING IN
NEW NORMAL".
The study aims to gather data that may answer the following questions: The
demographic profile of the respondents, the level of Psychological Well-being in terms of:
Environmental Mastery, Personal Growth, Positive relations with others. And the
relationship of Online Education and Psychological Well-being. The indicators of Online
Education are Internet Access, Learning Environment, and Teachers Effectiveness.
We would like to ask your innermost cooperation by honestly answering this
questionnaire. All your answers will be kept confidential as well as your identity. This
survey is solely for our practical research class.
Thank you.
GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN
MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO
(Researchers)
76

APPENDIX C
DATA MATRIX

Reliability Test

Positive Relations with Others

RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Score


1 4 3 4 3 5 4 3 26
2 3 3 4 4 5 4 4 27
3 4 4 4 5 4 5 3 29
4 4 5 3 4 4 4 4 28
5 3 2 5 2 3 2 2 19
6 4 4 5 3 4 3 4 27
7 4 4 5 4 4 4 4 29
8 4 4 5 4 5 5 5 32
9 5 4 5 4 5 4 4 31
10 3 3 5 4 3 2 4 24
11 4 5 3 4 5 4 4 29
12 3 3 3 2 4 4 3 22
13 5 5 4 5 4 4 4 31
14 5 5 1 5 5 4 5 30
15 4 4 5 3 5 4 4 29
11.84888889
0.462 0.78222 1.26222 0.69333 5.11111111
Variance 22 2 2 0.862222 0.488889 3 0.56 1

Table of variance

n 7
∑si2 5.11

st2 11.84

a 0.663147523
77

Personal Growth

Total
RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
1 5 5 3 3 4 5 4 29
2 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 24
3 5 5 1 3 5 5 4 28
4 5 5 1 1 4 5 5 26
5 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 23
6 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 29
7 4 4 3 3 4 4 4 26
8 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35
9 5 4 4 4 5 4 4 30
10 5 4 1 1 4 5 4 24
11 5 4 1 1 4 4 4 23
12 4 1 1 1 1 2 3 13
13 5 5 2 1 4 4 4 25
14 5 5 2 3 5 5 5 30
15 5 5 3 1 4 5 4 27
22.1155555
6

0.19
Variance 555 1.1288 1.71555 1.71555 0.9333 0.96 0.595556 7.24444444

Table of Variance

n 7
∑si2 7.24

st2 22.11

a 0.784637419
78

Environmental Mastery

Total
RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
1 3 4 3 3 3 2 4 22
2 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 24
3 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 27
4 4 3 4 3 4 1 3 22
5 1 4 3 2 1 3 4 18
6 3 4 3 4 4 1 3 22
7 3 4 4 4 3 3 3 24
8 5 3 4 4 4 3 3 26
9 3 4 4 4 4 3 4 26
10 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 19
11 5 2 4 4 4 1 3 23
12 4 2 3 3 1 1 1 15
13 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 27
14 4 3 4 5 5 2 4 27
15 4 3 3 4 4 1 2 21
11.982
22222
0.5066 0.4888 1.1822 0.72888 0.8622 4.9155
Variance 0.906667 67 0.24 89 22 9 22 55556

Table of Variance
n 7
∑si2 4.91
st2 11.98

a 0.688508625
79

Learning Environment

Total
RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
1 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 23
2 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 24
3 5 4 5 4 3 4 3 28
4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 21
5 1 1 5 3 3 1 1 15
6 5 3 4 4 4 3 3 26
7 4 4 3 4 4 4 4 27
8 5 3 4 4 4 3 3 26
9 5 4 5 4 4 4 3 29
10 4 4 3 3 3 4 3 24
11 5 4 4 5 4 5 4 31
12 4 3 3 2 3 4 3 22
13 5 4 4 4 4 5 5 31
14 4 5 2 5 5 4 4 29
15 5 4 3 4 4 3 3 26
16.51555
556
1.0933 0.7733 0.7288 0.5955 0.37244 0.9066 0.6933 5.163560
Variance 33 33 89 56 898 67 33 091

Table of Variance
n 7
∑si2 5.16
st2 16.51

a 0.802039168
80

Internet Connection

RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Total Score


1 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 25
2 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 25
3 5 5 4 3 4 4 4 29
4 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 22
5 2 3 4 2 1 1 1 14
6 5 5 5 4 4 5 5 33
7 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 22
8 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 29
9 4 4 5 3 4 3 4 27
10 4 5 4 3 3 4 4 27
11 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 32
12 4 4 5 3 4 5 4 29
13 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 27
14 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 35
15 4 5 5 3 4 4 4 29
24.53333333

Variance 0.67 0.46 0.36 0.64 0.78 1.02 0.92 4.84

Table of Variance

n 7
si2 4.84

st2 24.53

a 0.936472347
81

Teachers Effectiveness
Total
RESPONDENTS 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Score
1 4 4 3 5 4 5 5 30
2 4 4 4 3 3 4 4 26
3 4 5 3 4 4 3 4 27
4 4 4 4 3 4 4 4 27
5 3 3 3 4 4 4 3 24
6 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 30
7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 28
8 4 4 4 5 4 4 4 29
9 4 5 4 3 3 4 3 26
10 4 3 3 3 4 4 4 25
11 5 3 2 3 3 4 3 23
12 2 1 2 5 3 3 3 19
13 5 4 3 4 4 5 4 29
14 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 33
15 5 4 4 5 5 5 5 33
12.86

Variance 0.60 0.86 0.65 0.73 0.38 0.38 0.46 4.06

Table of Variance
n 7
∑si2 4.06
st2 12.86
a 0.798341109
82

TEACHERS EFFECTIVENESS
RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 4 3 4 5 4 5 4
2 4 4 3 5 4 4 4
3 4 3 3 3 3 3 4
4 2 1 2 2 1 2 1
5 5 4 4 5 5 5 4
6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
8 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
9 5 4 5 5 5 5 4
10 5 3 3 3 5 5 3
11 5 3 3 3 5 5 3
12 4 5 4 3 4 4 3
13 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
14 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
15 4 4 4 4 5 4 5
16 3 3 3 4 4 4 3
17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
18 3 4 2 4 2 3 4
19 4 4 3 5 3 3 3
20 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
21 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
22 4 5 4 5 3 4 4
23 4 5 4 4 4 4 4
24 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
26 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 5 4 4 4 5 5 5
29 2 3 3 3 3 2 3
30 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
31 3 3 2 2 3 3 3
32 4 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 4 3 3 4 3 4 4
34 4 5 4 5 5 5 5
35 5 4 5 4 5 4 4
36 4 3 3 5 4 4 4
37 5 5 5 5 4 4 4
38 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
83

39 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
40 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
41 5 5 5 4 4 5 5
42 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
43 3 2 1 1 2 2 2
44 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
45 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
46 4 3 3 4 3 3 3
47 5 4 4 4 4 4 5
48 4 4 4 5 5 5 5
49 4 4 5 5 5 4 5
50 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
51 4 4 3 4 3 5 4
52 3 4 3 5 5 4 4
53 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
54 2 3 3 3 2 3 3
55 4 2 3 4 5 4 3
56 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
57 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
58 4 3 3 4 4 4 4
59 4 4 3 5 4 4 4
60 2 2 2 3 3 2 2
61 4 3 4 2 3 3 3
62 4 4 3 4 3 4 3
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 4 3 2 4 4 3 3
65 3 4 4 5 5 5 5
66 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
67 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
68 3 3 3 5 4 4 3
69 5 4 4 4 5 5 5
70 5 4 4 4 5 4 5
71 4 4 3 4 3 4 3
72 3 3 3 3 3 5 5
73 4 4 3 3 3 3 4
74 3 3 4 3 3 4 4
75 2 1 2 1 1 1 1
76 4 3 4 3 4 3 3
77 4 4 3 5 5 5 5
78 4 4 3 5 4 5 5
84

79 3 1 2 4 5 2 3
80 3 4 4 3 4 4 2
81 5 4 4 4 4 4 5
82 3 2 3 4 4 4 3
83 5 5 3 3 2 4 4
84 4 4 3 5 5 4 4
85 4 4 3 3 4 4 3
86 5 5 4 5 5 5 5
87 5 4 4 5 5 4 4
88 2 2 1 3 3 4 2
89 4 3 5 5 5 4 5
90 4 3 4 5 4 4 3
91 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
92 3 5 3 5 5 3 3
93 3 3 2 4 4 3 3
94 4 3 3 4 3 4 3
95 5 4 4 4 5 5 5
96 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
97 4 2 3 4 3 4 4
98 4 4 4 3 4 4 3
99 4 3 4 4 5 5 4
100 3 4 3 5 4 4 4
101 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
102 4 3 4 5 5 5 4
103 4 5 4 4 5 4 4
104 5 4 4 5 4 5 4
105 5 3 4 4 4 4 4
106 4 4 3 4 5 3 5
107 4 4 4 5 5 5 4
108 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
109 3 3 3 3 3 4 3
110 5 4 3 4 4 4 3
111 2 3 3 3 3 2 3
112 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
113 4 3 4 4 4 3 3
114 4 4 3 4 3 3 4
115 4 4 4 4 5 4 3
116 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
117 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
118 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
85

119 3 1 3 3 3 4 3
120 3 3 3 5 1 5 5
121 3 2 3 3 3 2 2
122 5 2 4 4 3 3 4
123 5 5 5 4 4 4 4
124 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
125 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
126 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
127 5 5 4 5 5 5 4
128 4 4 4 5 5 4 4
129 3 4 4 5 5 5 5
130 3 3 1 3 3 4 3
131 4 4 4 5 4 4 4
132 4 3 3 4 3 4 3
133 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
134 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
135 3 3 3 2 3 2 3
136 3 4 3 3 2 4 3
137 4 3 3 4 3 4 4
138 4 3 4 5 5 5 4
139 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
140 5 3 3 2 3 4 5
141 2 1 1 1 1 2 2
142 4 3 2 3 3 3 3
143 3 3 3 5 5 4 3
144 4 4 5 4 5 4 4
145 5 5 4 5 3 5 5
146 4 5 4 4 5 5 4
147 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
148 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
149 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
150 5 4 5 5 5 5 5
151 3 4 2 4 3 5 4
152 4 3 3 4 4 4 3
153 4 5 4 4 4 5 4
154 4 4 4 5 3 3 4
155 4 3 3 4 4 4 4
156 4 3 4 3 3 3 3
157 4 4 3 5 5 4 4
158 4 4 3 5 4 5 4
86

159 4 4 4 3 3 5 5
160 4 3 4 4 3 4 4
161 3 5 3 4 3 5 4
162 4 1 3 5 5 5 5
163 5 4 5 5 5 5 5
164 4 3 3 5 3 4 4
165 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
166 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
167 5 4 5 5 5 5 5
168 4 4 4 5 5 5 4
169 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
170 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
171 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
172 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
173 4 3 4 5 4 4 5
174 3 4 4 5 5 4 3
175 3 2 4 4 3 4 4
176 4 5 3 5 4 5 4
177 3 2 3 5 3 5 3
178 2 2 3 2 2 2 2
179 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
180 4 3 5 4 3 4 4
181 5 4 4 5 3 5 4
182 5 4 5 5 4 5 5
183 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
184 4 4 3 3 3 4 4
185 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
186 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
187 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
188 3 2 4 5 3 4 4
189 4 3 3 4 4 3 4
190 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
191 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
192 5 4 4 5 5 4 4
193 4 3 1 3 4 3 2
194 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
195 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
196 4 4 4 5 3 4 4
197 5 4 5 5 5 5 5
198 4 4 3 3 3 4 4
199 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
87

OVERALL

MEAN 3.92

SD 0.93

INTERNET CONNECTION

RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
2 5 4 5 3 4 4 4
3 3 3 3 3 3 2 5
4 3 2 1 2 2 3 2
5 4 5 5 4 4 4 5
6 3 3 4 3 4 5 3
7 3 3 5 5 3 4 3
8 4 5 5 4 4 5 5
9 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
10 2 2 2 2 3 2 3
11 2 4 4 5 5 4 4
12 4 5 5 4 4 5 5
13 2 3 2 2 2 3 3
14 4 5 5 3 3 4 4
15 4 5 4 3 3 3 4
16 2 2 4 3 3 2 2
17 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
18 1 2 3 2 1 1 2
88

19 1 2 2 2 2 2 1
20 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
21 3 4 5 4 4 3 3
22 4 3 4 3 4 3 3
23 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
24 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
26 3 4 4 4 3 3 4
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 2 4 4 3 4 3 3
29 4 3 3 3 3 4 4
30 2 3 4 3 3 4 4
31 3 3 1 3 3 2 2
32 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
34 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
35 4 5 4 5 4 5 5
36 3 4 5 4 3 2 4
37 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
38 5 5 5 4 4 5 5
39 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
40 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
41 4 4 5 4 5 4 5
42 4 3 4 4 4 3 3
43 2 3 3 2 1 2 2
44 4 5 5 5 5 4 4
45 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
89

46 3 4 4 3 4 3 4
47 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
48 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
49 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
50 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
51 1 2 3 3 2 3 3
52 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
53 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
54 4 4 4 2 2 4 4
55 2 3 5 3 3 4 4
56 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
57 4 3 3 4 3 4 4
58 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
59 4 3 4 3 1 4 4
60 1 2 3 2 2 2 2
61 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
62 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 3 3 4 3 2 4 3
65 4 4 4 3 3 4 3
66 3 3 3 4 3 3 3
67 2 3 4 3 3 2 2
68 2 2 5 2 2 2 3
69 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
70 4 4 4 5 4 4 4
71 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
72 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
90

73 3 4 4 2 2 3 3
74 5 5 4 4 4 3 5
75 1 3 5 1 1 1 1
76 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
77 4 5 5 3 5 5 5
78 3 3 5 2 3 3 2
79 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
80 4 3 4 3 3 4 4
81 4 5 5 5 4 4 4
82 2 3 3 3 2 2 2
83 3 3 3 1 1 3 3
84 3 5 4 5 4 4 3
85 4 5 4 4 4 5 4
86 4 5 4 3 3 4 4
87 4 5 4 4 4 4 4
88 3 4 3 2 2 3 4
89 4 4 3 3 3 4 4
90 4 5 5 4 5 5 5
91 3 3 4 3 2 3 2
92 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
93 4 2 3 3 4 3 4
94 4 4 4 3 3 3 4
95 3 4 5 4 3 4 4
96 3 4 5 4 3 4 4
97 5 5 5 3 2 4 4
98 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
99 3 3 4 1 3 2 2
91

100 3 4 3 2 3 3 3
101 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
102 4 4 5 3 4 5 4
103 3 4 5 4 4 5 4
104 3 3 4 3 3 3 4
105 3 3 4 4 3 4 4
106 3 3 4 2 2 3 2
107 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
108 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
109 5 5 5 4 4 4 5
110 3 3 3 3 4 3 2
111 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
112 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
113 2 3 4 2 2 3 3
114 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
115 3 4 4 3 3 3 4
116 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
117 4 4 4 3 3 3 4
118 2 3 4 3 2 3 3
119 3 4 3 3 4 3 4
120 5 5 5 4 4 4 5
121 4 4 4 4 2 3 5
122 4 3 4 3 3 3 4
123 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
124 2 2 3 3 2 2 2
125 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
126 3 4 5 4 4 4 4
92

127 3 4 4 3 3 3 3
128 3 4 4 3 3 4 3
129 4 4 5 4 3 4 4
130 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
131 4 4 4 3 3 4 4
132 3 4 4 3 4 3 3
133 5 5 5 4 4 5 4
134 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
135 3 3 2 4 3 3 3
136 3 3 5 3 2 3 5
137 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
138 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
139 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
140 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
141 2 2 1 2 2 2 2
142 3 3 3 2 2 2 1
143 3 5 4 4 4 4 4
144 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
145 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
146 4 4 5 3 4 4 5
147 5 5 5 4 4 5 5
148 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
149 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
150 4 4 5 3 4 3 4
151 2 2 3 1 1 1 1
152 3 5 4 5 5 4 5
153 2 3 4 3 3 3 3
93

154 3 3 4 4 3 4 4
155 3 3 3 3 2 3 3
156 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
157 3 3 4 3 4 4 3
158 3 4 4 3 3 4 4
159 5 5 5 5 4 5 5
160 4 4 5 3 3 3 3
161 1 2 3 3 2 3 3
162 3 4 5 3 3 3 4
163 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
164 3 4 5 4 5 5 5
165 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
166 3 3 3 3 4 4 3
167 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
168 3 3 4 4 3 3 3
169 3 3 4 3 4 4 4
170 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
171 2 3 5 3 4 4 4
172 4 4 5 4 4 5 4
173 4 5 5 3 3 5 4
174 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
175 3 3 4 2 2 3 3
176 5 5 5 5 4 4 5
177 4 4 5 3 4 3 4
178 2 2 2 3 2 2 2
179 3 4 5 4 4 4 4
180 3 2 4 3 2 2 3
94

181 5 3 4 4 4 3 3
182 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
183 3 2 5 2 2 4 3
184 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
185 2 4 4 4 4 4 3
186 4 3 3 2 2 2 3
187 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
188 3 5 5 4 4 5 4
189 3 3 4 4 3 4 4
190 4 5 4 3 4 4 4
191 4 4 4 3 4 3 3
192 4 4 4 4 4 3 3
193 3 1 4 1 1 2 1
194 4 5 5 4 4 5 4
195 3 3 5 3 3 3 3
196 2 4 4 3 3 4 4
197 5 5 5 4 5 5 4

198 3 3 4 4 3 3 3
199 3 3 3 2 3 3 3
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
OVERALL

MEAN 3.58

SD 0.95
95

LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
2 5 4 4 4 4 5 5
3 3 2 4 3 3 1 1
4 3 3 3 2 2 2 3
5 5 3 3 4 4 5 3
6 3 1 5 3 3 3 1
7 3 4 2 3 3 3 3
8 5 5 4 5 5 5 4
9 2 2 4 3 3 2 2
10 2 2 4 4 3 2 1
11 3 3 5 4 5 4 5
12 4 4 2 4 4 4 3
13 3 3 5 3 3 2 1
14 1 1 5 4 4 2 1
15 4 3 4 4 4 3 3
16 2 3 4 3 3 2 2
17 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
18 1 1 2 1 1 1 2
19 1 2 3 3 3 2 2
20 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
21 4 4 4 4 3 4 3
22 3 4 5 4 4 3 4
23 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
24 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
26 5 3 5 4 4 4 3
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 3 3 3 3 4 3 3
29 1 2 3 3 1 1 3
30 2 1 5 2 3 2 1
31 3 1 5 4 4 3 5
32 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 3 3 4 4 3 3 3
34 3 3 4 4 5 4 3
35 4 4 5 5 3 4 4
96

36 2 3 4 3 3 4 1
37 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
38 4 3 3 4 4 4 4
39 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
40 4 4 3 4 4 3 4
41 5 4 5 4 5 5 5
42 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
43 2 2 1 2 2 2 2
44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
45 4 4 4 4 4 5 4
46 4 3 4 4 3 4 4
47 4 4 5 4 5 3 5
48 2 4 4 4 4 4 1
49 5 4 4 4 4 4 3
50 2 2 2 5 2 1 2
51 1 5 5 4 3 2 2
52 4 4 3 4 4 4 3
53 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
54 5 1 5 2 4 5 2
55 5 5 1 4 3 4 3
56 5 5 5 5 4 4 4
57 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
58 4 2 4 3 2 2 2
59 5 5 2 3 4 4 4
60 1 1 2 2 1 1 2
61 5 5 3 3 4 4 5
62 4 3 4 3 3 4 4
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 3 1 2 3 2 1 1
65 4 4 4 4 3 4 5
66 3 3 4 3 3 4 3
67 3 2 4 3 3 3 2
68 3 3 4 3 4 3 3
69 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
70 4 5 5 5 4 4 4
71 4 3 4 4 3 3 2
72 3 5 5 5 4 3 3
73 1 2 2 3 2 2 2
74 5 3 3 4 3 4 4
75 1 1 5 1 1 1 1
97

76 3 3 3 4 3 3 4
77 5 5 3 4 4 4 4
78 5 3 5 2 2 5 2
79 5 5 3 5 5 5 3
80 1 1 5 3 3 3 3
81 5 4 4 4 4 3 3
82 1 1 5 1 2 1 1
83 1 3 4 4 3 4 4
84 4 3 4 5 4 3 3
85 5 5 3 4 4 5 4
86 5 4 5 5 5 4 3
87 5 4 4 4 4 5 5
88 5 4 3 5 4 5 3
89 5 3 3 4 4 3 5
90 5 4 4 5 5 4 4
91 4 2 5 2 5 3 2
92 5 5 4 4 4 4 4
93 5 5 3 3 4 5 5
94 1 1 4 3 3 1 1
95 3 3 3 4 4 4 3
96 4 3 3 3 3 3 1
97 3 4 5 4 4 5 4
98 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
99 3 4 4 4 4 4 3
100 5 4 4 4 4 3 4
101 3 3 5 3 3 3 1
102 5 4 5 4 4 4 2
103 3 4 4 4 4 3 3
104 3 3 4 4 3 4 4
105 5 3 4 2 3 4 2
106 4 3 4 3 3 2 2
107 4 4 3 4 4 5 3
108 5 5 2 3 4 5 5
109 5 4 3 5 5 5 3
110 3 2 4 3 2 2 3
111 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
112 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
113 3 2 5 4 3 2 1
114 4 3 4 5 4 3 4
115 4 4 2 5 4 3 2
98

116 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
117 1 3 4 3 4 1 3
118 1 1 5 1 1 1 1
119 3 1 5 2 3 3 2
120 4 3 5 5 4 4 5
121 5 4 4 3 3 3 2
122 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
123 4 4 4 3 4 3 3
124 1 1 5 2 1 1 1
125 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
126 4 4 4 4 4 4 5
127 4 3 5 3 3 3 3
128 3 3 4 4 3 3 1
129 5 4 5 4 1 4 1
130 4 4 5 2 4 4 1
131 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
132 2 3 4 3 3 3 3
133 3 3 4 4 5 4 3
134 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
135 4 4 2 3 3 4 4
136 5 3 5 4 4 3 3
137 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
138 3 3 5 2 2 2 1
139 4 5 5 5 5 5 5
140 1 1 3 3 1 1 1
141 3 3 1 4 3 3 4
142 2 1 5 2 3 2 2
143 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
144 3 3 3 3 3 2 3
145 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
146 3 4 4 3 5 3 4
147 5 5 1 4 4 5 3
148 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
149 3 3 5 4 4 3 3
150 3 4 4 4 4 4 2
151 1 1 5 1 1 1 1
152 5 3 3 5 5 5 4
153 3 3 3 3 3 3 2
154 4 4 3 3 4 4 3
155 2 2 5 3 3 2 2
99

156 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
157 3 3 3 3 3 2 2
158 3 4 4 4 4 3 4
159 3 4 2 5 5 3 3
160 3 3 3 4 4 3 3
161 4 3 3 3 4 4 5
162 2 2 5 2 3 2 3
163 5 5 5 5 5 4 5
164 3 3 5 4 4 4 4
165 4 4 3 2 3 4 3
166 2 2 4 3 2 3 2
167 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
168 3 3 4 4 3 3 2
169 4 4 3 3 3 4 3
170 3 4 4 5 4 4 4
171 1 2 3 3 3 4 3
172 4 3 5 4 4 2 2
173 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
174 5 5 1 4 4 5 5
175 1 1 5 4 2 1 1
176 4 5 5 4 5 3 4
177 4 4 4 3 4 4 3
178 2 2 1 2 2 2 4
179 2 2 5 4 4 4 5
180 4 3 5 3 3 4 2
181 2 2 3 2 3 3 2
182 3 3 4 4 4 4 3
183 2 3 5 5 5 4 2
184 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
185 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
186 2 2 3 3 3 2 2
187 4 5 5 4 4 4 4
188 2 3 4 4 4 1 4
189 3 3 4 4 3 4 3
190 4 3 4 3 4 3 3
191 4 3 4 3 3 4 3
192 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
193 3 1 2 3 3 3 3
194 4 4 3 4 4 4 3
195 5 4 5 4 3 5 4
100

196 3 3 3 4 3 2 2
197 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
198 2 3 4 3 4 3 3
199 3 4 4 3 3 3 4
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
OVERALL

MEAN 3.38

SD 1.06

ENVIRONMENTAL MASTERY
RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 4 3 5 4 3 2 4
2 5 3 3 3 2 2 3
3 3 3 4 3 3 2 3
4 2 2 2 2 2 4 4
5 4 3 4 4 4 1 5
6 2 3 2 2 2 4 3
7 1 1 5 3 4 3 5
8 5 4 4 4 5 2 2
9 3 3 3 5 4 3 2
10 2 3 3 3 3 3 3
11 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
12 4 3 4 5 5 1 2
13 3 2 2 2 2 2 5
14 1 3 3 4 3 4 5
15 4 3 4 3 2 3 3
16 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
17 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
18 3 2 2 2 1 2 2
19 3 3 3 4 4 4 4
20 4 3 3 3 4 3 4
21 4 4 4 3 3 3 4
22 3 3 4 4 4 4 4
23 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
24 3 3 3 3 2 3 3
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
26 5 3 4 3 4 2 4
101

27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 4 4 4 4 3 2 4
29 3 4 4 4 3 3 4
30 4 3 3 2 3 1 3
31 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
32 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 3 3 3 3 3 3 4
34 3 3 3 4 3 4 3
35 4 5 4 5 4 4 4
36 3 3 3 3 3 2 3
37 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
38 4 3 4 4 4 3 3
39 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
40 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
41 5 4 5 4 5 4 4
42 4 3 4 4 4 3 4
43 4 3 5 1 4 2 2
44 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
45 5 5 4 4 5 4 5
46 4 4 4 4 3 4 3
47 5 3 5 4 5 3 4
48 3 4 4 4 3 4 4
49 3 3 4 5 5 1 4
50 3 3 3 3 4 1 5
51 5 5 5 5 5 1 3
52 5 3 4 4 2 2 3
53 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
54 3 1 2 3 2 2 2
55 4 3 4 4 4 1 4
56 4 3 4 3 4 1 3
57 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
58 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
59 4 4 4 3 4 3 2
60 3 1 1 1 2 5 5
61 4 3 3 3 4 3 3
62 4 3 4 3 4 4 5
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 3 3 3 4 3 3 4
65 4 4 5 4 5 2 4
66 4 3 3 4 4 4 3
102

67 3 4 3 3 3 3 4
68 3 2 3 4 3 3 4
69 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
70 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
71 3 2 4 5 2 2 3
72 4 4 4 3 4 3 4
73 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
74 4 3 4 4 3 4 4
75 2 2 1 1 1 4 4
76 3 3 3 4 3 3 4
77 4 3 4 4 4 3 3
78 2 4 4 4 5 2 4
79 3 4 4 4 4 2 4
80 4 3 3 4 3 3 3
81 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
82 1 2 3 2 3 1 3
83 4 4 4 3 4 4 3
84 4 3 4 4 4 2 4
85 4 4 4 5 4 5 3
86 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
87 4 4 4 4 4 2 4
88 3 4 4 3 4 3 5
89 5 5 4 3 3 4 4
90 4 3 4 3 4 1 3
91 5 3 4 3 3 2 3
92 4 4 5 4 4 3 4
93 4 4 4 4 5 2 3
94 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
95 5 4 4 4 5 5 4
96 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
97 4 2 3 2 3 1 4
98 3 3 3 3 4 1 3
99 3 3 4 3 4 2 4
100 4 4 3 4 3 3 3
101 4 4 4 4 3 2 3
102 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
103 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
104 3 3 3 4 4 3 4
105 3 3 4 3 2 3 4
106 4 3 4 2 2 3 2
103

107 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
108 3 4 3 3 3 3 3
109 4 4 5 5 4 2 3
110 3 3 3 4 4 5 4
111 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
112 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
113 2 2 3 3 2 1 3
114 4 4 4 5 4 3 4
115 4 3 4 4 4 2 4
116 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
117 3 3 3 4 3 3 3
118 1 2 3 2 2 1 4
119 2 4 4 3 4 5 3
120 1 2 4 3 5 1 5
121 2 2 3 3 3 2 4
122 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
123 4 4 4 4 3 3 4
124 3 2 4 2 5 1 3
125 4 5 4 4 5 5 4
126 4 4 4 3 3 3 3
127 4 3 3 3 4 4 3
128 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
129 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
130 2 4 4 4 3 5 5
131 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
132 3 2 2 3 3 2 2
133 4 5 4 4 4 3 4
134 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
135 3 4 4 4 4 3 3
136 4 2 2 3 3 2 3
137 3 3 3 3 3 4 4
138 2 3 4 2 2 4 4
139 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
140 3 1 2 3 2 3 2
141 3 3 2 2 3 2 2
142 2 2 3 3 3 3 3
143 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
144 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
145 5 5 5 4 4 3 4
146 1 3 3 4 3 2 4
104

147 1 5 4 5 5 1 3
148 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
149 4 4 5 4 4 4 4
150 4 4 5 4 3 2 3
151 3 1 1 1 1 2 4
152 4 5 4 5 5 3 3
153 4 4 4 3 5 3 3
154 4 3 5 4 3 4 4
155 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
156 4 4 3 3 2 2 3
157 3 4 4 3 3 4 3
158 4 5 4 3 4 3 4
159 3 5 4 4 4 2 4
160 3 3 4 4 3 3 3
161 3 3 4 3 5 4 3
162 3 3 3 3 3 2 3
163 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
164 5 3 4 4 3 3 5
165 2 2 3 3 4 3 4
166 4 4 3 3 4 3 4
167 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
168 3 3 4 3 3 3 4
169 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
170 4 4 4 4 5 5 4
171 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
172 3 4 3 4 3 3 4
173 4 3 3 3 3 4 4
174 4 4 4 4 3 2 2
175 4 2 3 2 2 2 2
176 4 4 4 4 4 3 5
177 3 3 3 2 3 2 4
178 2 3 3 3 3 4 3
179 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
180 5 3 4 3 2 3 4
181 2 3 2 2 4 1 4
182 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
183 3 3 3 3 4 1 3
184 3 4 4 4 3 2 3
185 3 4 5 4 4 3 5
186 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
105

187 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
188 3 4 5 3 4 4 3
189 3 4 4 4 3 2 2
190 4 4 4 4 3 3 3
191 3 4 4 4 3 3 3
192 3 3 4 3 4 2 3
193 5 3 1 4 1 2 5
194 5 5 5 4 4 1 3
195 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
196 3 4 4 4 4 4 5
197 4 4 4 4 4 3 4
198 4 4 4 3 4 3 4
199 3 3 3 3 3 1 3
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
OVERALL

MEAN 3.41

SD 0.94
106

PERSONAL GROWTH
RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 5 5 2 2 4 5 4
2 5 2 4 5 2 3 3
3 5 5 4 4 3 4 3
4 2 2 4 4 2 2 2
5 4 4 4 1 4 4 4
6 4 3 5 2 3 5 3
7 5 5 3 5 5 4 4
8 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
9 4 4 1 4 5 5 5
10 5 5 1 3 4 4 4
11 5 5 5 4 4 4 4
12 5 4 1 4 4 5 5
13 5 3 5 2 4 4 4
14 5 4 5 1 4 5 5
15 5 4 3 3 4 4 3
16 5 3 2 4 3 5 2
17 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
18 4 2 5 4 5 3 3
19 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
20 5 5 3 2 5 4 4
21 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
22 4 5 5 4 5 5 4
23 5 4 4 4 4 4 4
24 4 4 2 3 4 4 4
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
107

26 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 5 5 4 3 5 4 4
29 3 1 3 5 1 1 1
30 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
31 1 1 1 3 1 1 2
32 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 5 4 2 2 5 5 4
34 5 5 4 1 4 5 5
35 5 5 5 4 4 4 4
36 5 4 3 3 4 5 3
37 5 5 2 2 4 4 5
38 5 4 2 1 4 4 4
39 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
40 4 5 4 3 4 4 4
41 5 5 5 1 5 5 5
42 5 4 3 3 4 4 4
43 5 5 5 2 4 5 5
44 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
45 5 4 4 4 5 4 4
46 5 4 5 4 4 4 3
47 5 5 1 3 5 5 4
48 5 5 3 4 5 4 4
49 5 5 3 4 5 5 5
50 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
51 5 5 2 1 5 5 5
52 4 3 5 3 1 5 3
108

53 3 3 3 3 2 2 2
54 5 5 4 1 4 5 4
55 5 5 1 4 5 4 5
56 4 5 3 3 5 5 4
57 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
58 5 5 3 2 4 4 4
59 5 5 5 5 5 4 5
60 3 5 3 1 5 5 5
61 4 5 3 3 4 4 4
62 4 3 3 4 4 3 4
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 5 4 1 1 4 5 4
65 5 5 3 3 4 5 4
66 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
67 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
68 4 5 4 3 4 4 3
69 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
70 5 5 5 5 4 4 4
71 5 5 3 3 4 5 3
72 4 5 4 4 3 4 3
73 5 4 3 3 4 4 4
74 4 3 4 1 5 5 5
75 5 1 1 2 2 4 2
76 3 3 3 3 3 4 3
77 5 5 3 3 5 5 4
78 5 4 5 2 4 5 5
79 5 4 3 4 3 4 5
109

80 5 4 5 3 4 4 4
81 5 5 1 1 5 5 4
82 5 4 5 2 4 5 2
83 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
84 5 5 2 2 5 5 5
85 4 4 3 3 4 3 4
86 4 5 4 3 5 5 5
87 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
88 5 5 2 3 5 5 5
89 4 4 5 4 3 4 4
90 5 4 3 3 3 4 3
91 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
92 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
93 5 5 3 3 5 5 5
94 5 5 3 3 3 3 4
95 5 5 4 5 4 5 5
96 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
97 4 4 2 2 4 4 4
98 5 5 2 2 4 5 4
99 5 5 3 1 5 5 5
100 5 4 2 3 4 4 4
101 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
102 5 5 2 2 4 4 4
103 4 3 5 5 5 5 5
104 4 5 4 2 5 4 4
105 5 3 3 4 3 5 3
106 4 4 3 1 5 4 4
110

107 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
108 5 5 2 1 5 5 5
109 5 5 2 3 5 5 5
110 3 4 5 4 4 4 4
111 1 3 4 3 3 2 3
112 5 5 3 3 5 5 5
113 5 4 4 2 3 5 3
114 4 4 3 3 3 3 4
115 5 4 2 1 4 5 3
116 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
117 5 4 3 3 3 3 4
118 3 4 4 3 3 4 5
119 5 2 3 4 3 5 5
120 5 5 2 1 4 5 5
121 4 4 3 2 3 3 3
122 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
123 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
124 5 5 1 1 3 5 5
125 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
126 5 5 4 4 4 5 4
127 5 4 5 3 4 5 3
128 4 4 3 1 4 5 3
129 5 5 4 2 5 5 5
130 5 5 5 3 3 4 5
131 4 4 3 2 4 5 4
132 5 4 2 2 4 5 4
133 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
111

134 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
135 2 2 3 2 2 2 2
136 4 5 5 3 5 5 2
137 4 4 3 3 3 4 4
138 5 4 5 4 4 5 4
139 5 5 4 3 4 5 5
140 3 5 3 1 5 5 5
141 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
142 5 4 3 2 3 4 4
143 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
144 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
145 5 5 4 4 5 5 4
146 5 5 5 2 3 5 4
147 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
148 5 5 3 2 5 5 5
149 5 5 4 2 5 5 4
150 5 5 3 3 4 4 4
151 5 3 5 2 3 3 1
152 5 5 3 4 5 5 4
153 5 5 3 3 4 4 4
154 3 4 4 4 4 4 4
155 4 4 3 3 5 4 4
156 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
157 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
158 5 5 3 4 5 5 5
159 5 5 2 4 5 5 5
160 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
112

161 4 5 3 4 3 4 4
162 5 5 4 2 4 5 3
163 5 5 4 2 4 5 5
164 5 5 2 3 5 5 5
165 4 3 3 1 5 4 2
166 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
167 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
168 5 5 3 3 5 5 5
169 4 4 3 3 4 4 4
170 4 4 4 4 4 5 5
171 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
172 5 5 3 3 4 4 3
173 5 3 3 2 5 5 5
174 3 3 4 2 3 5 5
175 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
176 5 4 5 4 4 4 5
177 4 2 4 5 2 3 3
178 1 2 5 2 2 2 2
179 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
180 5 4 2 2 4 4 4
181 3 4 3 3 3 3 4
182 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
183 5 5 3 3 5 5 5
184 4 4 3 2 4 4 4
185 5 4 3 3 5 5 4
186 5 5 1 1 5 5 5
187 5 5 3 5 5 5 4
113

188 5 5 2 1 5 4 4
189 4 3 4 2 4 4 3
190 4 3 3 4 3 5 4
191 4 3 4 3 4 4 3
192 5 5 4 3 5 5 5
193 5 3 5 5 2 5 5
194 5 4 3 3 4 5 4
195 5 5 3 4 5 5 5
196 4 4 4 2 3 3 3
197 4 5 3 3 5 5 5
198 4 4 3 3 5 5 4
199 5 5 2 3 4 5 4
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

OVERALL

MEAN 4.17

SD 0.90
114

POSITIVE RELATIONS WITH OTHERS


RESPONDENTS Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7
1 4 4 4 3 4 4 4
2 4 4 3 3 4 4 3
3 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 2 3 1 3 2 3 2
5 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
6 2 2 5 2 3 6 2
7 4 3 4 3 4 4 5
8 5 5 2 3 4 4 4
9 5 5 3 4 5 4 3
10 3 3 3 3 4 4 4
11 4 4 4 5 4 4 4
12 5 5 2 5 5 5 5
13 4 4 4 3 4 3 4
14 5 5 5 1 5 3 4
15 4 3 5 4 5 4 4
16 3 3 4 4 5 3 5
17 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
18 3 3 4 4 4 3 3
19 5 3 4 4 5 4 5
20 5 4 4 4 3 3 4
21 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
22 5 5 5 1 5 5 5
23 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
24 4 4 3 3 3 3 3
25 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
26 5 4 5 3 5 3 4
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 3 2 5 3 5 3 3
29 1 1 4 1 1 1 1
30 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
31 1 1 1 4 2 2 3
32 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
33 4 4 2 3 4 3 4
34 5 4 4 4 5 4 4
35 4 5 4 5 4 5 4
36 3 3 5 5 4 3 5
115

37 5 5 4 4 4 4 4
38 4 4 5 3 4 4 4
39 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
40 4 4 4 4 5 3 4
41 4 4 1 4 5 4 4
42 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
43 4 2 1 3 3 3 3
44 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
45 5 5 4 4 5 5 4
46 4 4 4 3 4 3 4
47 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
48 4 4 4 4 5 4 4
49 3 4 4 4 4 4 5
50 5 5 3 3 5 5 5
51 5 5 5 4 3 5 4
52 1 1 3 1 3 2 3
53 3 2 2 2 2 2 2
54 4 3 3 1 3 5 4
55 5 5 2 4 4 4 4
56 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
57 4 4 4 4 5 5 5
58 4 5 3 4 4 4 4
59 4 3 4 4 5 4 4
60 5 2 3 2 5 3 3
61 4 4 4 5 4 5 5
62 4 3 4 4 4 3 4
63 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
64 3 3 2 3 3 3 3
65 5 5 4 3 3 4 5
66 5 4 1 4 4 4 5
67 4 4 5 3 3 3 3
68 3 3 4 3 4 3 3
69 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
70 4 4 5 5 5 4 4
71 4 5 5 3 5 4 5
72 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
73 4 3 4 5 5 4 4
74 4 3 3 4 3 5 3
75 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
76 4 4 3 4 3 4 3
116

77 4 5 3 5 5 3 3
78 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
79 4 2 5 5 5 4 5
80 5 4 5 3 4 3 4
81 5 4 4 4 4 5 5
82 4 1 3 1 3 1 2
83 4 4 4 1 4 4 5
84 5 5 2 3 5 5 5
85 4 3 4 4 4 3 4
86 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
87 5 5 4 4 5 5 5
88 4 4 4 3 5 4 5
89 4 4 5 4 4 4 5
90 4 3 4 3 4 3 3
91 5 5 5 3 5 5 5
92 5 4 5 4 5 5 5
93 5 5 5 4 5 5 5
94 5 4 4 4 4 3 4
95 5 4 4 4 4 4 5
96 4 4 5 3 3 3 3
97 3 2 4 2 4 2 3
98 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
99 4 4 5 4 5 2 5
100 5 5 5 3 5 4 4
101 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
102 4 4 1 3 3 3 4
103 5 5 5 3 5 4 2
104 4 4 4 4 3 4 4
105 4 4 4 2 4 2 4
106 4 4 5 3 5 2 3
107 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
108 5 4 2 4 5 4 3
109 4 4 1 3 3 2 3
110 4 3 4 4 4 4 4
111 3 3 2 3 2 3 3
112 5 5 1 4 4 4 4
113 3 3 5 3 4 3 3
114 4 3 3 3 4 3 3
115 4 4 5 4 4 3 5
116 4 4 3 4 4 4 4
117

117 4 3 3 4 4 4 4
118 4 3 5 3 5 4 5
119 4 4 1 3 4 5 3
120 3 2 5 3 3 3 2
121 4 3 4 2 3 3 3
122 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
123 5 5 3 3 4 5 5
124 5 4 5 3 5 3 3
125 4 5 4 4 4 4 4
126 3 3 5 4 4 3 4
127 5 4 5 3 4 3 3
128 4 5 4 4 4 3 4
129 4 3 5 4 5 3 5
130 4 4 5 5 5 4 4
131 4 3 4 3 4 4 4
132 3 3 2 3 4 3 3
133 4 4 4 4 5 5 4
134 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
135 2 2 2 3 3 3 3
136 5 4 3 3 5 5 5
137 2 2 5 2 4 2 2
138 4 4 5 3 5 2 4
139 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
140 5 4 4 5 5 5 5
141 2 3 1 2 1 2 3
142 3 3 4 4 5 4 3
143 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
144 4 4 4 4 5 5 4
145 3 4 5 5 5 5 5
146 4 3 5 3 5 3 4
147 5 5 3 4 4 5 5
148 4 4 4 5 4 4 4
149 4 4 5 4 5 3 3
150 4 4 4 3 5 4 5
151 3 1 2 2 5 2 3
152 5 5 5 3 5 4 5
153 4 4 4 5 5 5 4
154 4 5 4 3 4 3 4
155 5 4 4 5 5 4 5
156 3 2 3 2 3 3 2
118

157 4 3 3 3 5 3 4
158 4 4 5 4 5 5 5
159 5 4 3 4 5 4 3
160 4 4 4 4 5 4 3
161 4 4 5 4 5 4 4
162 3 3 3 2 3 4 5
163 5 5 5 4 5 4 5
164 4 3 5 3 3 2 4
165 3 4 5 4 5 4 4
166 3 3 4 3 3 3 3
167 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
168 5 4 3 3 4 4 4
169 4 3 2 3 4 4 4
170 5 4 4 5 5 4 4
171 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
172 3 3 2 3 4 3 4
173 4 3 5 3 3 2 3
174 4 3 5 3 4 3 3
175 3 3 4 3 5 3 3
176 4 4 5 4 5 5 4
177 3 3 4 2 4 1 3
178 3 3 2 3 2 2 2
179 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
180 3 2 3 3 4 3 4
181 3 4 3 3 3 4 3
182 5 5 5 5 5 5 4
183 5 4 5 4 5 4 5
184 4 4 5 4 4 4 3
185 4 4 5 3 4 4 4
186 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
187 4 4 5 4 5 3 4
188 4 4 3 4 4 5 5
189 4 4 3 3 4 3 3
190 4 3 4 3 4 3 4
191 4 3 4 3 3 3 4
192 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
193 5 5 1 5 5 2 4
194 5 4 2 4 5 4 4
195 5 5 5 4 3 3 4
196 4 3 4 3 3 3 3
119

197 5 5 3 5 5 5 5
198 5 3 3 3 5 4 5
199 5 4 4 3 4 3 4
200 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
OVERALL
MEAN 3.81
SD 0.96
120

Glycelle D. Agustin
018, Brgy. Calumpang, Liliw, Laguna
09657030817
glyagustinn@gmail.com

I. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Age: 21 years old


Gender: Female
Height: 5’5
Weight: 48 kls.
Birthday: September, 22, 1999
Birth Place: Sta. Cruz, Laguna
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father’s Name: Alberto G. Agustin
Occupation: Truck Driver
Mother’s Name: Sherly D. Agustin
Occupation: N/A

II. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary Laguna State Polytechnic University


Sta. Cruz, Main Campus
2018- To present
Secondary Calumpang National High School (Junior High School)
Calumpang Nagcarlan, Laguna
2016
121

Nagcarlan Senior High School (Senior High School)


Silangan, Kabubuhayan, Nagcarlan, Laguna
2018
Primary Kabubuhayan Elementary School
Calumpang Nagcarlan, Laguna
2012

III. SEMINARS/ WEBINARS ATTENDED


“Inclusive Psychology: Valuing Diversity and Accommodation among Filipinos”
MOA- SMX Convention Center and National University, Manila
January 24-25, 2020
“Gender- Based Violence: The LGBTQ Experience”
Via Zoom Meeting
March 19, 2021
“AKO NAMAN MUNA; A Journey of Finding Love within Ourselves”
Via Zoom Meeting
March 19, 2021
“Taking Risks and Failing: You Win or You Learn”
Via Zoom Meeting
March 27, 2021
“Transitioning to the New Normal through Psychological Healing and Recovery”
Virtual Gathering
May 07, 2021
122

IV. REFERENCES

Mr. Ralph Randel R.Rivera, RPm.

Psychology Instructor

Laguna State Polytechnic University- Sta. Cruz, Campus

0966-418-2786

Mr. Wilfredo G. Faustino Jr., RPm.

Psychology Instructor

Laguna State Polytechnic University- Sta. Cruz, Campus

0936-861-1957

I hereby certified that the above mentioned statement is true and correct to the best of

my knowledge and belief.

GLYCELLE D. AGUSTIN
123

Maria Leana Viktoria A. Tuico


Purok 1, Brgy. Calumpang, Nagcarlan, Laguna
09555364106/ 09094328589
tuicoleana@gmail.com

I. PERSONAL INFORMATION

Age: 21 years old


Gender: Female
Height: 4’10
Weight: 53 kls.
Birthday: September, 18, 1999
Birth Place: San Pablo, Laguna
Religion: Roman Catholic
Father’s Name: Victor B. Tuico
Occupation: Vendor
Mother’s Name: Lea A. Tuico
Occupation: N/A

II. EDUCATIONAL BACKGROUND

Tertiary Laguna State Polytechnic University


Sta. Cruz, Main Campus
2018- to present
124

Secondary Calumpang National High School (Junior High School)


Calumpang Nagcarlan, Laguna
2016
Nagcarlan Senior High School (Senior High School)
Silangan, Kabubuhayan, Nagcarlan, Laguna
2018
Primary School of Saint John Bosco
Calumpang Liliw, Laguna
2012

III. SEMINARS/ WEBINARS ATTENDED

“Inclusive Psychology: Valuing Diversity and Accommodation among Filipinos”


MOA- SMX Convention Center and National University, Manila
January 24-25, 2020
“Millennial Leadership: Youth Influence to Success”
Via Facebook Live
July 17, 2020
“Gender- Based Violence: The LGBTQ Experience”
Via Zoom Meeting
March 19, 2021
“AKO NAMAN MUNA; A Journey of Finding Love within Ourselves”
Via Zoom Meeting
March 19, 2021
125

“Taking Risks and Failing: You Win or You Learn”


Via Zoom Meeting
March 27, 2021
“Transitioning to the New Normal through Psychological Healing and Recovery”
Virtual Gathering
May 07, 2021
“One Life Simmer 2021: A Mental Health Awareness Talk with the topic “ Kaya Mo
Yan! Overcoming Toxic Positivity & Embracing Health Positivity
Via Google Meeting
May 08, 2021

IV. REFERENCES
Mr. Ralph Randel R.Rivera, RPm.

Psychology Instructor

Laguna State Polytechnic University- Sta. Cruz, Campus

0966-418-2786

Mr. Wilfredo G. Faustino Jr., RPm.

Psychology Instructor

Laguna State Polytechnic University- Sta. Cruz, Campus

0936-861-1957

I hereby certified that the above mentioned statement is true and correct to the best

of my knowledge and belief.

MARIA LEANA VIKTORIA A. TUICO

You might also like