Professional Documents
Culture Documents
215067-Article Text-530618-1-10-20210927
215067-Article Text-530618-1-10-20210927
Melkamu A Zeru
Abstract
Background: TB/HIV co-infection is a major public health problem in many parts of the world. But the prevalence of
co-infection was varies among countries.
This study was designed to assess prevalence of TB/HIV co-infection and to determine its factors.
Methods: A retrospective study was done among HIV-positive patients at Hiwot Fana hospital from December, 2014 to
2018. The study participants were selected by simple random sampling. Patients with incomplete chart reviews were exclud-
ed and demographic, clinical and laboratory information were analyzed using SPSS and STATA. Uni-vitiate and bivariate
logistic regressions were applied.
Results: Five hundred fourteen patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 187(37.4%) had TB. Bivariate logistic analysis
showed that HIV patients with regards to marital status[AOR = 2.6; 95%CI = 1.19- 2.89] , education status [AOR = 3.74;
95%CI = 2.47–5.66], weight less than 50kg [AOR = 2.54; 95% CI = 1.35 – 4.81], CD4 level < 200cells/mm3 [AOR = 4.57;
95%CI = 2.38– 6.86] and patient who were at WHO clinical stage III [AOR = 7.8; 95%CI = 5.15 – 8.55] were significantly
associated with TB/HIV co-infection.
Conclusion: The prevalence of TB among HIV patients was high and predicted by marital, education status, weight, CD4
cell count and WHO clinical stage III.
Keywords: Prevalence; TB; HIV; co-infection; Harari Region.
DOI: https:// dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i3.7
Cite as: Zeru MA. Prevalence and associated factors of HIV- TB co-infection among HIV patients: a retrospective Study. Afri Health Sci.
2021;21(3): 1003-1009. https:// dx.doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v21i3.7
African © 2021 Zeru MA. Licensee African Health Sciences. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative commons Attribution License
Health Sciences (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is
properly cited.
Table
Table 2: 2: Socio-demographic
Socio-demographic characteristics
characteristics of studyofparticipants
study participants in Fana
in Hiwot Hiwot Fana
Referral Hospital (n
Referral Hospital (n = 514) = 514)
VariablesVariables Frequency
Frequency PercentPercent
(%) (%)
Sex Sex
Male Male 244 244 47.5 47.5
FemaleFemale 270 270 52.5 52.5
Age Age
<30 years<30 years 21 21 42.4 42.4
≥ 30 year≥ 30 year 296 296 57.6 57.6
MaritalMarital
status status
MarriedMarried 282 282 54.9 54.9
Others Others 232 232 45.11 45.11
EducationEducation
status status
Illiterate
Illiterate 204 204 39.7 39.7
LiterateLiterate 310 310 60.3 60.3
ResidenceResidence
Rural Rural 241 241 46.9 46.9
Urban Urban 273 273 53.2 53.2
Table 3: Bivariate and Multivariable association of TB/HIV co-infection and independent factors
Table 3: Bivariate andTable
Multivariable association
3: Bivariate of TB/HIV co-infection
and Multivariable association and independent
of TB/HIV factors and independent factors
co-infection
V HIV/TB Co-infected
Va V HIV/TB Co-infected HIV/TB Co-infected
a r Yes No COR (95%CI) P-value AOR (95% CI) P- value
a Yes No YesCOR (95%CI) No COR (95%CI) AOR (95%P-value
P-value CI) P- value
AOR (95% CI)
r iSex r
Sex Sex
i Male
a i 79 165 0.72(0.49 - 1.03) 0.34 0.78(1.31 – 2.96) 0.230
Male
a bFemale Male 79 165 0.72(0.49 - 1.03)
79 165 0.34
0.72(0.49 0.78(1.31 – 2.96)
- 1.03) 0.34 0.2300.78(1.31 – 2.96)
a 108 162 1 1
Female
bAge b 108
Female 162 108 1 162 1 1 1
l
Age l e Agel
e < 30 year 93 125 0.62(0.43- 0.89) 0.15 0.52(3.34 – 5.79) 0.200
< 30s year <e30 year
93 125 0.62(0.43- 0.89)
93 125 0.15
0.62(0.43- 0.52(3.34 – 5.79)
0.89) 0.15 0.2000.52(3.34 – 5.79)
s ≥ 30 year s 94 94 202 1 1
≥ 30 year ≥ 30 year 202 94 1 202 1 1 1
Marital status
Marital status Marital status
Married 95 137 1 1
Married 95
Married 137 95 1 137 1 1 1
Others 92 190 1.69(1.48 – 2.01) 0.042* 2.6(1.19- 2.89) 0.011
Others Others92 190 1.69(1.48
92 – 2.01)
190 0.042* – 2.01)2.6(1.19- 2.89)
1.69(1.48 0.042* 0.011* 2.6(1.19- 2.89)
Education status *
Education status Education status
Illiterate 98 106 3.06(2.10-4.44) 0.01*
Illiterate 98
Illiterate 106 3.06(2.10-4.44)
98 106 0.01*
3.06(2.10-4.44) 0.01*
Literate 81 229 1
Literate 81
Literate 229 81 1 229 1
Residence
Residence Residence
Rural 80 183 1.69(1.18 - 2.44) 0.2 1.97(1.31 – 2.96) 0.110
Rural Rural80 183 1.69(1.18
80 - 2.44)
183 0.2
1.69(1.18 1.97(1.31 – 2.96)
- 2.44) 0.2 0.1101.97(1.31 – 2.96)
Urban 107 144 1 1
Urban Urban107 144 107 1 144 1 1 1
Weight
Weight Weight
≤ 50 kg 94 129 0.64(0.44-0.92) 0.01* 2.54(1.35 – 4.81) 0.003
≤ 50 kg ≤ 50 kg94 129 0.64(0.44-0.92)
94 129 0.01*
0.64(0.44-0.92)2.54(1.35 – 4.81)
0.01* 0.003*2.54(1.35 – 4.81)
>50 kg 93 98 1 1 *
>50 kg >50 kg 93 98 93 1 98 1 1 1
CD4 Count
CD4 Count CD4 Count
<200cells/m3 120 165 1.55(2.38 - 4.79) 0.002* 4.57(2.38 – 6.86) 0.007
<200cells/m3 120 3
<200cells/m 165 1.55(2.38 - 4.79)
120 165 0.002* - 4.79)
1.55(2.38 4.57(2.38 – 0.002*
6.86) 0.007*4.57(2.38 – 6.86)
3 67 162 1 1 *
≥200cells/mm
≥200cells/mm3 67
≥200cells/mm 3 162 67 1 162 1 1 1
Clinical stage
Clinical stage Clinical stage
Stage I 17 33 1 1
Stage I Stage17 I 33 17 1 33 1 1 1
Stage II 21 87 1.49(0.97 – 2.28) 0.12 1.27(0.79 - 2.03) 0.310
Stage II Stage21 II 87 1.49(0.97 – 2.28)
21 87 0.12
1.49(0.97 1.27(0.79 - 2.03)
– 2.28) 0.12 0.3101.27(0.79 - 2.03)
Stage III 76 85 0.403(0.23 – 0.70) 0.04* 7.8(5.15 – 8.55) 0.000
Stage III Stage76 III 85 0.403(0.23
76 – 0.70)
85 0.04*
0.403(0.23 7.8(5.15 – 8.55)
– 0.70) 0.04* 0.000*7.8(5.15 – 8.55)
Stage IV 73 122 0.86(0.44 – 1.65) 0.28 0.29(0.38 – 1.59) *0.500
Stage IV 73
Stage IV 122 0.86(0.44 – 1.65)
73 122 0.28
0.86(0.44 0.29(0.38 – 1.59)
– 1.65) 0.28 0.5000.29(0.38 – 1.59)
Hosmer - Lemenshow test p-value 0.673*
Hosmer - Lemenshow Hosmer test p-value
- Lemenshow 0.673*
test p-value 0.673*
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
_________________________________________________________________________________________________
____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
___________________
* means___________________
statistically significant at 5 % level of significance ( p- value < 0.05)
* means
Othersstatistically
significant
means(Single, meansatstatistically
* divorced 5and
% level ofsignificant
significance
Windowed) at (5p-%value
level<of0.05)
significance ( p- value < 0.05)
Others means(Single, divorced
Others and Windowed)divorced and Windowed)
means(Single,
The Hosmer-Lemeshow test provided good fit for the ple logistic regression was used to determine factors of
model (p-value =0.673) TB/HIV co-infection after adjusting other covariates.
Results in the bivariate analysis showed that the variable From this result, HIV patients whose marital status was
residence, WHO clinical stage, education status, mari- different from married were 2.6 times more likely to
tal status, CD4 counts and weight were associated with develop TB than that of married [AOR= 2.6; 95 % CI
TB/HIV co- infection. Multivariate analysis in multi- = 1.19 – 2.89]. The illiterate patients were 3.74 times