MID-YEAR REVIEW FORM (MRF) for Teacher I-III

Name of Employee: IRENE G. CABATUAN Name of Rater: MERLY C. LUSDOC

Position: TEACHER III Position: PRINCIPAL I
Bureau/Center/Service/Division: MISAMIS OCCIDENTAL Date of Review: FEBRUARY 6, 2023
Rating Period: AUGUST 2022 – JULY 2023

Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year

MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results

Basic 1. Content 1. Applied 21% Classroom Observation Quality

Education Knowledge knowledge of Tool (COT) rating sheet/s
Services and content within or inter-observer
Pedagogy and across agreement form/s done
curriculum
through onsite/ face-to-
teaching areas.
(PPST 1.1.2) face/ in-person classroom
observation.

If onsite / face-to-face/ in- Efficiency

person classes are not
implemented,
•through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching Timeliness
*via LAC session.
Basic 2. Used a range Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies that observer agreement form/s
enhance learner done through onsite/ face-to-
achievement in face/ in-person classroom
literacy and observation.
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
numeracy skills. Efficiency
(PPST 1.4.2) If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
person classes are not
implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching
Timeliness
*via LAC session.
Basic 3. Applied a Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education range of teaching (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services strategies to observer agreement form/s
develop critical done through onsite/ face-to-
and creative face/ in-person classroom
thinking, as well observation.
as other higher-
order thinking If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
skills. person classes are not
(PPST 1.5.2) implemented, Efficiency
• through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Timeliness
Basic 2. Learning 4. Managed 21% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Environment classroom (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and Diversity structure to observer agreement form/s
of Learners engage learners, done through onsite/ face-to-
individually or in face/ in-person classroom
groups, in observation.
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
meaningful Efficiency
exploration, If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
discovery and person classes are not
hands-on implemented,
activities within a •through observation of
range of physical synchronous/
learning asynchronous teaching in
environments. other modalities; or
(PPST 2.3.2) •through observation of a Timeliness
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Basic 5. Managed Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education learner behavior (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services constructively by observer agreement form/s
applying positive done through onsite/ face-to-
and non-violent face/ in-person classroom
discipline to observation.
ensure learning-
focused If onsite / face-to-face/ in- Efficiency
environments. person classes are not
(PPST 2.6.2) implemented,
• through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
• through observation of a
demonstration teaching Timeliness
*via LAC session.
Basic 6. Used Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education differentiated, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services developmentally observer agreement form/s
appropriate done through onsite/ face-to-
learning face/ in-person classroom
experiences to observation.
address learners’
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
gender, needs, If onsite / face-to-face/ in- Efficiency
strengths, person classes are not
interests, and implemented,
experiences. •through observation of
(PPST 3.1.2) synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.

Timeliness
Basic 3. Curriculum 7. Planned, 21% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education and Planning managed and (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services implemented observer agreement form/s
developmentally done through onsite/ face-to-
sequenced face/ in-person classroom
teaching and observation.
learning
processes to If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
meet curriculum person classes are not
requirements and implemented, Efficiency
varied teaching • through observation of
contexts. synchronous/
(PPST 4.1.2) asynchronous teaching
in other modalities; or
• through observation of
a demonstration
teaching *via LAC
session.

Timeliness
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
8. Participated in 1. Proof/s of attendance in Quality
collegial LAC sessions/ FGDs/
discussions that meetings/ other collegial
use teacher and discussions.
learner feedback 2. Minutes of LAC sessions/
to enrich teaching FGDs/ meetings/ other
practice. collegial discussions on use
(PPST 4.4.2) of teacher ad learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice.
3. Reflection notes of
teachers on their
demonstration of teaching Efficiency
practices following
participation from LAC Timeliness
sessions/ FGDs/ meetings/
other collegial discussions
that use teacher and learner
feedback to enrich teaching
practice, with proof/s of
attendance.
4. Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights the
objective
Basic 9. Selected, Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education developed, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services organized, and observer agreement form/s
used appropriate done through onsite/ face-to-
teaching and face/ in-person classroom
learning observation.
resources,
including ICT, to If onsite / face-to-face/ in- Efficiency
address learning person classes are not
goals. implemented,
(PPST 4.5.2) •through observation of
synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in
other modalities; or
Timeliness
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.
Basic 4. 10. Designed, 21% Classroom Observation Tool Quality
Education Assessment selected, (COT) rating sheet/s or inter-
Services and organized and observer agreement form/s
Reporting used diagnostic, done through onsite/ face-to-
formative and face/ in-person classroom
summative observation.
assessment
strategies If onsite / face-to-face/ in-
consistent with person classes are not
curriculum implemented,
requirements. •through observation of
(PPST 5.1.2) synchronous/
asynchronous teaching in Efficiency
other modalities; or
•through observation of a
demonstration teaching
*via LAC session.

Timeliness
Basic 11. Monitored Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education and evaluated •Individual Learning
Services learner progress Monitoring Plan (ILMP)
and achievement •Peer assessment data
using learner •Sample of learners’ output
attainment data. with reflection/ self-
(PPST 5.2.2 assessment
•Progress charts/ anecdotal
records
•Class/e-class record/
grading sheets Efficiency
•Lesson plans showing
index of mastery Timeliness
•Frequency of errors with
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
identified least/ most
mastered skills
•Any equivalent ALS form/
document that highlights
the objective (e.g.,
Individual Learning
Agreement (ILA), ALS
Assessment Form 2)
•Others (Please specify and
provide annotations)
Basic 12. Any one (1) of the following: Quality
Education Communicated
Services promptly and • A sample of corrected test
clearly the paper of a learner in a
learners’ needs, learning area with parent’s
progress and or a guardian’s signature
achievement to and date of receipt
key stakeholders,
including • Minutes of meetings with
parents/guardian key stakeholders (e.g.,
s. PTA, SGC, SPT, CPC)
(PPST 5.4.2). with a proof of attendance

• Report card with parent’s

or guardian’s signature in
all quarters supported by Efficiency
minutes of meeting Timeliness
• Communication with key
stakeholders (e.g., parents/
guardians, co-teachers,
LGU) using various
modalities

• Anecdotal record showing

entries per quarter

• Any equivalent ALS

form/document that
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
highlights the objective

• Others (Please specify and

provide annotations)

Basic 5. Personal 13. Applied a 14% A reflection/journal entry Quality

Education Growth and personal that highlights the
Services Professional philosophy of application of a learner-
Development teaching that is centered teaching
learner-centerd. philosophy in the lesson pan
(PPST 7.1.2) or community work.

Efficiency
Timeliness

14. Set 1. Certification from the ICT Quality

professional Coordinator/ School
development Head/ Focal Person in
goals based on charge of e-SAT.
the Philippine 2. IPCRF-DP
Professional 3. Mid-year Review Form
Standards for (MRF)
Teachers. 4. Updated IPCRF-DP from
(PPST 7.5.2) Phase II Efficiency
 Tim Weight Mid-year Review Rating Mid-year
MFOs KRAs Objectives elin per Means of Verification Performan Ratee (Teacher) Rater (Principal) Review
e KRA ce Target Rating Remarks Rating Remarks Results
Timeliness

Plus Factor 15. Performed 2% Any one (1) proof of: Quality
various related • committee of involvement;
works/activities • involvement as
that contribute to module/learning material
the teaching- writer/validator;
learning process. • involvement as a resource
person/speaker/ learning
facilitator in the
RO/SDO/school-initiated
TV/radio-based Efficiency
instruction;
• book or journal
authorship/ co-
authorship/contributorship
/ chairpersonship;
• participation in
demonstration teaching;
• participation as research
presenter in a Timeliness
forum/conference;
• mentoring of pre-service/
in-service teachers;
• conducted research within
the rating period;
• others (please specify)
with annotation on how it
contributed to the
teaching-learning
process.
MERLY C. LUSDOC IRENE G. CABATUAN EUGENE I. MACAHIS JR.
Rater Ratee Approving Authority