Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Numbaa Yearly Sweep
Numbaa Yearly Sweep
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Remarks Re-Issued Report Replaces Report No 10848/R/30895-1 (reason: Testing added )., Results apply to the sample/s as received.
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Remarks Re-Issued Report Replaces Report No 10848/R/30895-1 (reason: Testing added )., Results apply to the sample/s as received.
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Sample Number
ID / Client ID
Lot Number
Date / Time Sampled
Material Source
Material Type
Sampling Method
Client Sample ID
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Client Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road, Numbaa Project Number: 10848/P/170
Cement Type: Port Kembla GP Cement Source: Cement Australia Port Kembla
0.12
Expansion V's Age
0.10
0.08
Expansion (%)
0.06
0.04
0.02
0.00
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Age (Days)
-
- -
- - -
Accredited for Compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing. Name: Timothy Mathie
WORLD RECOGNISED Function: Authorised Signatory
ACCREDITATION Date: 12-May-21
LSB016-AS - RS 25-Jan-19 Page 1 of 1
Wollongong Laboratory
Report for Unit 1, 140 Industrial Road, Oak Flats, NSW, 2529
Chloride & Sulfate in Hardened Concrete & Aggregate Phone: 02 4257 4458
(Nitric acid extraction method)
Email/Fax: wollongong@constructionsciences.net
Address: 1178 Comerong Island Road Numbaa NSW 2541 Project No: 10848/P/170
-
- -
-
-
Quantative Tests:
Chloride Content: (% mass) Sulfate Content: (% SOᶟ Mass)
0.037 0.01
Determination Method:- Volhard titration Determination Method:- Gravimetric Method:
Remarks: Results Apply to the Sample(s) as Received
Accredited for Compliance with ISO/IEC 17025 - Testing. Name: Timothy Mathie
WORLD RECOGNISED Function: Authorised Signatory
ACCREDITATION Date: 22-Apr-21
LSB096-AS - RS 5-Jun-20 Page 1 of 1
Our Ref M31685 P21-2050
14 June 2021
71 Connors Road
Southern Cross Waterfronts Mackay QLD 4740
1178 Comerong Island Road Australia
Numbaa, NSW 2541
SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION
CLIENT Southern Cross Waterfronts
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION Sand
PROJECT NAME SCM290321
SOURCE Supplied
SAMPLE REFERENCE 10848/S/84651
DATE SAMPLED 29/03/2021
SAMPLED BY Client
SUMMARY
One sample was submitted for petrographic analysis to determine suitability for use as concrete sand, and to
petrographically assess the potential for alkali-silica reactivity.
The sample was assessed with reference to the following standards (NATA accredited):
• AS 1141.65-2008: Alkali aggregate reactivity – Qualitative petrological screening for potential alkali-
silica reaction;
• ASTM C295. Standard Guide for Petrographic Examination of Aggregates for Concrete
The following procedures are also referenced (non-NATA accredited)
• AS1726: Geotechnical Site Investigation;
• HB79-2015 Alkali Aggregate Reaction – Guidelines on Minimising the Risk of Damage to Concrete
Structures in Australia.
The mineralogy present in the thin section and the hand specimen indicates that the sample should be classed
as a natural, well sorted, quartz and lithic-rich sand.
Based on the guidance given by the referenced documentation and the assessment undertaken by a
qualified and experienced petrographer, the sample is considered to be:
• Substantial potential for alkali-silica reactivity;
• Free from asbestiform minerals;
• Fresh with reference to AS1726;
• Durable; and
• Petrographically suitable for use as a concrete aggregate.
The sample as inspected is therefore deemed petrographically suitable for use as fine concrete aggregate
providing the durability and other inherent properties are assessed by mechanical and / or chemical testing.
SPECIMEN DESCRIPTION
The sample comprises approximately 1.5kg of free-flowing pale grey, relatively fine sand. The sample is well
sorted, with the majority of the sample only marginally visible to the naked eye, though there is a small amount
of coarser grains. Under magnification with a 10x loupe the sand was found to comprise mainly of subangular
grains with the largest component being sands around 1mm in size.
The clasts appear to be mainly fine grained quartz with lithics, with quartz being more abundant overall; a few
white feldspars and black amphiboles were present. Under 10x magnification the grains show little evidence
of staining. There does not appear to be any significant secondary coating developed on the clasts. Shells
were present in small amounts overall.
A sub-sample was mixed with water. A grey turbidity resulted which settled within 1 minute. The water was left
with a very pale brown colouration indicative of small amounts of clay, this took around 8 hours to settle.
A further sub-sample was graded by Construction Sciences using sieve sizes with reference to AS1141.11.1:
100% of the sample passed the 1.18mm sieve, with 2% passing the 0.075mm grading. The majority of the
sample (90%) fell between the 1.18mm and 0.150mm sieve sizes.
Examination of the sand under 10x magnification indicates that the majority of oxides and quartz cannot be
crushed under finger pressure. There are shells present which may prove weaker.
A minor amount of organics are present which will likely be removed by processing. No other foreign materials
were observed in the sample
Sample is made up of of lithic fragments and monominerals, Same view in cross polarised light. Quartz grains show
mainly quartz. Some iron oxide discolouration present. Shells variable amounts of straining. Sericite present in lithics but
also seen in sample, 100x magnification little alteration overall. XPL, 100x magnification
An assessment on the percentage of minerals likely to be non-durable is given (based on the point count
results).
44% of the clasts comprised monomineralic quartz, with 12% being monominerals of other compositions. 29%
were quartz lithics, 13% were lithics of other rock types and the remaining 2% were shells
No carbonates were observed in the specimen, the sample is therefore assessed as being INNOCUOUS IN
RELATION TO ALKALI CARBONATE REACTIVITY.
ASBESTOS MINERALS
Asbestos can be defined on the basis of two critera, both of which must be met simultaneously: that is, a
defined asbestos mineral and the presence of that mineral in an asbestiform habit. Based on the observable
minerals in the thin section, the sample is considered FREE FROM ASBESTOS MINERALS.
WEATHERING
Little weathering was observed in the quartz-rich parts of the specimen, but the lithic fragments appear to
have a certain degree of mineral replacement. With reference to AS1726 -2017, Table 20, generally the
sand shows little decomposition and can be considered FRESH.
LIMITATIONS
The analysis is based on a single sample and thin section taken from that sample, it may not be representative
of the sample mass as a whole and inspection of the source should be undertaken to further qualify the
suitability of the aggregate for the intended use. Comments are general and may be superseded by material
specification. If a specification exists further advice may be sought from a mineralogist to ensure compatibility.
Yours faithfully