Professional Documents
Culture Documents
10 1016@j Ijfoodmicro 2019 108457
10 1016@j Ijfoodmicro 2019 108457
PII: S0168-1605(19)30388-5
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108457
Reference: FOOD 108457
Please cite this article as: S. Yamaki, S. Kuronuma, Y. Kawai, et al., Inhibitory effect
of a combination with novel jumbo bacteriophages ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 on Morganella
morganii subsp. morganii growth and histamine accumulation, International Journal of
Food Microbiology (2019), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.108457
This is a PDF file of an article that has undergone enhancements after acceptance, such
as the addition of a cover page and metadata, and formatting for readability, but it is
not yet the definitive version of record. This version will undergo additional copyediting,
typesetting and review before it is published in its final form, but we are providing this
version to give early visibility of the article. Please note that, during the production
process, errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers
that apply to the journal pertain.
of
2
Graduate School of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University, Hakodate, Japan
ro
Correspondence: Shogo Yamaki, Laboratory of Marine Food Science and Technology, Faculty
-p
of Fisheries Sciences, Hokkaido University 3-1-1, Minato, Hakodate 041-8611, Japan. Tel:
1
Journal Pre-proof
Abstract
is being developed to prevent multiple foodborne illnesses. Here, we describe the inhibitory
subsp. morganii, the primary causative agent of histamine poisoning in fish meat. We isolated
novel two phages, ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4, which infected M. morganii subsp. morganii strains
of
tested in this study. ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 belong to family Myoviridae. Pulsed-field gel
electrophoresis revealed that these phages are jumbo bacteriophages with large genomes. The
ro
latent period, rise period and burst size of ΦMV-1 were 30 min, 60 min, and 224 PFU per
-p
infected cell, respectively, and those of ΦMV-4 were 60 min, 50 min, and 62 PFU per infected
is more effective for inhibition of growth and histamine accumulation by M. morganii subsp.
morganii than single phage treatment. Treatment with phage mixture inhibited growth and
na
histamine accumulation by M. morganii subsp. morganii in canned and fresh tuna. The phage
mixture might be an effective way to prevent growth of the histamine producer and
ur
histamine poisoning
2
Journal Pre-proof
1. Introduction
poisoning caused by seafood. Unlike most cases of food poisoning, the disease is not caused
by infection of the patient, but by ingesting the histamine secreted into fish meat by bacteria.
Histidine-rich fish meats, including tuna, mackerel, bonito, and sardine, are causative foods.
The symptoms of scombroid poisoning are mild, allergy-like symptoms including hives, rash,
flushing and facial swelling (Hungerford, 2010). However, there are some reports of severe
cases with potentially life-threatening events (D’Aloia et al., 2011; Sánchez-Guerrero et al.,
of
1997). The elimination of histamine from foods is impractical because it is stable during
heating and freezing. The good hygienic practice is important for avoiding contamination of
ro
histamine-producing bacteria. However, some of the histamine-producing bacteria are natural
-p
contaminants of seafood. Therefore, to prevent poisoning, the growth of histamine-producing
bacteria must also be suppressed before they secrete high levels of histamine.
re
Morganella morganii, a motile gram-negative bacterium, belongs to the family
lP
Enterobacteriaceae and is the causative agent of many diseases including diarrhea, urinary
tract infections, bacteremia, and sepsis (Chang et al., 2011; Müller, 1986). M. morganii has a
na
strong ability to secrete histamine in decomposed fish meats and is a leading cause of
(López-Sabater et al., 1996; Rodtong et al., 2005). M. morganii is widely distributed in fish
Jo
and their environment. Kim et al. (2003) showed M. morganii in the gills, skin, and intestine
of fish, as well as on the surfaces of conveyor belts and plastic totes used in fish processing.
Hence, inhibiting the growth of M. morganii is critical during seafood processing and storage
Bacteriophages (phages) are viruses that specifically infect and lyse bacterial cells.
They are now being considered as agents for controlling or reducing pathogens. Therapeutic
aeruginosa have been investigated in multiple studies (Biswas et al., 2002; Gupta and Prasad,
2011; McVay et al., 2007; Shen et al., 2012). Phages can also be used to control foodborne
3
Journal Pre-proof
pathogens. Some phage products, such as LISTEXTM P100 against Listeria monocytogenes,
Netherlands), and EcoShieldTM against Escherichia coli (Intralytix, Baltimore, MD, USA),
have already been developed. The anti-Listeria activity of LISTEXTM P100 has been
demonstrated on cheese, melon, pear, cooked turkey, roast beef, and raw salmon fillets
(Chibeu et al., 2013; Oliveira et al., 2014; Soni et al., 2012; Soni and Nannapaneni, 2010).
The Department of Agriculture and the Food and Drug Administration of the United States
have approved LISTEXTM P100 as a “Generally Recognized As Safe” food processing aid for
of
control of L. monocytogenes. For biogenic amine reduction, Ladero et al. (2016) reported the
ro
in cheese production. In addition, our previous report indicated possibility of phage utilization
-p
for the prevention of histamine accumulation in tuna (Yamaki et al., 2018).
Practical uses of phages for food safety have some limitations, particularly limited
re
host range as well as regrowth of the target bacteria. Our previous report showed regrowth of
lP
M. morganii on challenge testing in vitro after phage treatment, although phage treatment
caused a 6-log CFU/mL reduction of the viable cell count (Yamaki et al., 2014). Mixtures of
na
multiple phages appear to be more effective in inhibiting regrowth and the emergence of
phage-resistant bacteria. Tanji et al. (2004) reported that a mixture of two phages could delay
ur
the emergence of phage-resistant E. coli O157:H7, and Kim et al. (2014) mentioned that the
Jo
mixture of phage SSU 5 and SSU 14, which adsorb to the lipopolysaccharide core or
utilization has potential for inhibiting histamine poisoning (Yamaki et al., 2014; Yamaki et al.,
2015: Yamaki et al., 2018). However, in the past, few phages for the biological control of M.
morganii have been identified (Oliveira et al., 2017), and additional M. morganii phages are
needed for efficient control by treatment with phage mixture. In this study, we have isolated
and characterized two previously unknown phages infecting M. morganii subsp. morganii and
evaluated phage-mixture treatment for inhibiting the growth of M. morganii subsp. morganii
4
Journal Pre-proof
Table 1 lists bacterial strains used in this study, and Table S1 shows the capability of
Photobacterium were grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB; Becton, Dickinson and Company
(BD), Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) at 30°C for 18 h. M. psychrotolerans was grown in TSB at
25°C for 24 h, and Photobacterium was grown in TSB supplemented with 1.5% NaCl for 24 h.
P. phosphoreum was incubated at 20°C, and P. damselae was incubated at 25°C. For bacterial
of
challenge assays using raw tuna, chloramphenicol-resistant M. morganii subsp. morganii
NBRC3848cr was used for selective detection of inoculated M. morganii among contaminants
ro
in the raw tuna. This strain was grown in TSB supplemented with 1% histidine and 50 µg/mL
-p
chloramphenicol at 30°C for 18 h.
re
2.2. Isolation of phages
lP
We isolated M. morganii phages using the method of Carvalho et al. (2010) with
minor modifications. Briefly, 400 mL of river water was added to 400 mL of 2× TSB
na
containing 400 µg/mL CaCl2 and 400 µg/mL MgSO4. M. morganii subsp. morganii
NBRC3848T, NBRC3168, or ATCC25829 cells in log phase were inoculated into the resulting
ur
mixture (105 CFU/mL) and incubated at 30°C for 6 h. After incubation, 10 mL of each sample
Jo
was centrifuged (6,000 × g, 20 min, 4°C), and the resulting supernatants were decanted and
filtered using 0.45-µm pore size polyvinylidene fluoride membrane filters (Merck Millipore,
Billerica, MA, USA). The filtrates were used for phage detection. Ten µL of filtrate was
spotted onto 0.5% top agar inoculated with M. morganii subsp. morganii overlaid, onto tryptic
soy agar (TSA; BD). Plates were incubated at 30°C for 18 h. Clear single plaques were picked
Tris-HCl, and 0.01% gelatin, pH 7.5). These steps were repeated at least three times for phage
purification. To propagate the isolated phages, 800 µL of phage suspension were inoculated at
108 PFU/mL to 800 mL of a culture of M. morganii NBRC3848T (OD600 = 0.1) and incubated
at 30°C for 6 h. The culture was centrifuged (6,000 × g, 20 min, 4°C) and the supernatant was
5
Journal Pre-proof
decanted and filtered as described above. Phages were concentrated by polyethylene glycol
precipitation method and purified on a CsCl density gradient. Purified phages were dialyzed
For each fresh bacterial broth culture listed in Table 1, 100 µL of each fresh liquid
culture was added to 3 mL of 0.5% soft agar and overlaid onto a TSA or TSA supplemented
with 1.5% NaCl plate. After solidification of the agar, 10 µL of phage solution was spotted
of
onto the bacterial lawn. Plates were incubated, and plaque formation were checked. Host
ranges were evaluated by plaque formation and efficiency of plating (EOP). EOP was
ro
calculated by a comparison of phage titers on each bacterial strain with those of the strains
-p
obtained as maximum phage titers.
re
2.4. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM)
lP
High-titer phage solutions (>109 PFU/mL) were dropped onto a 200-mesh Cu grid
(Nisshin EM, Tokyo, Japan) and negatively stained with 2.5% samarium triacetate, a good
na
substitute for uranyl acetate for negative staining (Nakakoshi et al., 2011). The morphologies
of isolated phages were observed with a JEM-1011 (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). Phages were
ur
classified by morphology.
Jo
Purified phages were embedded in agarose plugs (SeaKem Gold Agarose, Lonza, Rockland,
ME, USA) and lysed by soaking in lysis buffer and Proteinase K. PFGE was performed on a
TSB and grown at 30°C. When the OD600 of the culture reached 0.8, bacteria were pelleted
6
Journal Pre-proof
(10,000 × g, 5 min, RT) and washed with fresh TSB. Five mL of the culture was
pre-incubated at 30°C for 5 min, then each phage was added at 106 PFU/mL. The mixture was
incubated at 30°C, and 100 µL of each sample was added to 900 µL of SM buffer. The sample
solution was filtered through a 0.45-µm membrane, then PFU were quantitated by a
double-agar overlay method. One hundred µL of each sample and broth culture of M.
morganii NBRC3848T were added to 4 mL of 0.5% molten soft agar and poured onto a TSA
of
2.7. One-step growth curves
M. morganii NBRC3848T was inoculated into TSB and incubated at 30°C. When
ro
the OD600 of the culture reached 0.1, phages were added at 105 PFU/mL and adsorbed at 30°C
-p
for 10 min. Following centrifugation (10,000 × g, 2 min, 4°C), the pellet containing infected
cells was resuspended in fresh TSB, incubated at 30°C, and samples for measurement were
re
collected chronologically. Phage titers were measured as described above.
lP
final concentration of 107 PFU/mL. During heating (40–70°C) for intervals between 0 to 30
ur
min, samples were taken every 5 min and placed on ice. Phage titers were measured as
Jo
described above. The pH stability of phages was examined by incubating them in TSB (pH 3–
1×103 CFU/mL into TSB containing 1% histidine (pH 6.5). Phage ΦMV-1 (1 × 105 PFU/mL),
ΦMV-4 (1 × 105 PFU/mL), or an equivalent phage mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 (1 × 105
PFU/mL), were added to cultures. Cultures were incubated at 12°C for 12 days, and samples
were collected for determination of viable cell counts at 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 12 days. Collected
samples were diluted and spread onto TSA plates for determination of viable cell count.
7
Journal Pre-proof
NBRC3168 inoculated in TSB were added to wells of 96-well microtiter plates. Thereafter,
ΦMV-1, ΦMV-4, or the equivalent mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were diluted in TSB and
100 µL of dilution was inoculated. TSB inoculated M. morganii without phage was used as a
control. Final concentrations of bacteria and phage were 1 × 103 CFU/mL and 1 × 107
PFU/mL, respectively. Plates were incubated at 20°C, and OD595 absorbances were measured
of
at 24-h intervals. Wells with OD595 > 0.05 were defined as regrown, and the regrowth rate (%)
ro
(Number of wells with OD595 > 0.05 / Number of all wells) × 100
-p
2.11. Bacterial challenge assay using canned tuna
re
Mixture of M. morganii NBRC3848T and NBRC3168 was inoculated at 3 × 103
lP
CFU/g to 75 g of sterilized canned tuna. After mixing, 750 µL of the phage mixture
(equivalent mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4) was inoculated at 3 × 107 PFU/g. Inoculated
na
canned tuna were mixed, stored at 12°C for 5 days or 20°C for 48 h, and 5 g of stored meats
were collected and homogenized with 45 mL of PBS at each sampling time during storage.
ur
Homogenized solution was diluted and spread onto TSA plates for viable cell counts of M.
Jo
morganii. TSA plates were incubated at 30°C for 48 h, and CFU was determined.
For histamine assays, homogenized solutions were heated at 100°C for 30 min to
denature histidine decarboxylases and centrifuged. Histamine in supernatants was measured
with a Histamine Test Kit (Kikkoman Biochemifa, Tokyo, Japan) according to the
manufacturer’s instructions.
Raw tuna purchased at a local supermarket was cut into 5-g pieces using a sterile
knife and each piece of meat was placed in a sterile petri dish. Fresh cultures of M. morganii
NBRC3848cr, which is chloramphenicol resistant, were washed and diluted. Diluent (50 µL)
8
Journal Pre-proof
was added to each piece at 3 × 103 CFU/g. After incubation at room temperature for 30 min,
100 µL of the mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 diluted with PBS was added at 3 × 107 PFU/g.
Samples were incubated at 20°C, with samples taken to assay bacterial growth and histamine
concentration every 12 h.
For bacterial counts, pieces of tuna were homogenized with 45 mL of PBS and
spread onto agar plates. For counts of all bacteria, samples were spread onto TSA plates. For
M. morganii counts, samples were spread onto modified Niven’s agar (5.0 g/L tryptone, 5.0 g
/L yeast extract, 1.0 g/L CaCO3, 25.0 g/L L-histidine hydrochloride monohydrate, 5.0 g/L
of
NaCl, 0.06 g/L bromocresol purple, and 20.0 g/L agar, pH 5.1; Niven et al., 1981)
supplemented with 50 µg/mL chloramphenicol. After spreading, TSA plates were incubated at
ro
30°C for 48 h, and Niven’s agar plates were incubated at 30°C for 24–48 h.
-p
2.13. Statistical analyses
re
Bacterial and phage counts were performed in duplicate. Results are represented as
lP
mean values and standard deviation. Two-way ANOVA with Holm-Bonferroni method or
Welch’s test were conducted for comparisons of means. P values less than 0.05 were
na
considered to be statistically significant. All statistical tests were conducted with R v3.3.1 (R
9
Journal Pre-proof
3. Results
morganii subsp. morganii from river water samples obtained in Hakodate, Hokkaido, Japan.
These phages formed plaques against M. morganii subsp. morganii. The host ranges of
ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were tested against the 30 strains of gram-negative bacteria including 10
strains of genus Morganella (Table 1). M. morganii subsp. morganii strains were sensitive to
ΦMV-1 or ΦMV-4, and two strains (ATCC25829 and JNBP_03145) showed lysis only at high
of
phage titer. M. psychrotolerans JCM16473T was sensitive to ΦMV-1. However, M. morganii
subsp. sibonii JCM16939T was not sensitive to both phages. Both phages did not show lysis
ro
against Proteus and Providencia that were related genera to Morganella. These observations
-p
suggest that ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 are useful phages for the control of M. morganii subsp.
morganii.
re
lP
The isolates ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were further characterized by TEM. Based on
na
morphology, ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 appeared to be members of the family Myoviridae, with
long, rigid, and contractile tails (Fig. 1A, B). The head diameter and tail length of ΦMV-1
ur
were 116 ± 8 nm and 307 ± 16 nm, respectively (n = 30), and those of ΦMV-4 were 121 ± 8
Jo
nm and 122 ± 9 nm (n = 30), respectively. Genome sizes were analyzed by PFGE (Fig. 1C).
The genome sizes of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were approximately 230 and 360 kbp, respectively,
indicating that these phages were jumbo phages.
3.3. Adsorption kinetics and one-step growth curves of phages ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4
Figure 2A show changes of rate of free phages during incubation. ΦMV-1 rapidly
adsorbed against M. morganii cells, and 88% of ΦMV-1 adsorbed at 2.5 min. However,
adsorption of ΦMV-4 was slow. After 10 min, only 50% of ΦMV-4 was adsorbed against M.
morganii cells. Adsorption constants of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were 1.11 × 10-9 mL/min and
9.05 × 10-11 mL/min. One-step growth curves (Fig. 2B) show that the latent period, rise period,
10
Journal Pre-proof
and burst size of ΦMV-1 were 30 min, 60 min, and 224 PFU per infected cell, and those of
ΦMV-4 were 60 min, 50 min, and 62 PFU per infected cell, respectively.
biocontrol agents. Figures 3A and C show the viability of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 as a function of
temperature. ΦMV-1 survived at 40°C and 50°C for 30 min, but viable ΦMV-1 was not
detected after heating at 60°C for 20 min or at 70°C (Fig. 3A), indicating that heating to 60°C
of
is sufficient to inactivate ΦMV-1. The thermal stability of ΦMV-4 was superior to that of
ΦMV-1, as it was stable at 40–60°C for 30 min. Viable ΦMV-4 was not detected after heating
ro
to 70°C (Fig. 3C). The pH stability of the phages is shown in Figs. 3B and D. ΦMV-1 was
-p
stable at pH 5.0–8.0, for 24 h (Fig. 3B). ΦMV-4 had greater pH stability than ΦMV-1, as it
indicate that ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 have suitable stabilities for practical use in ready-to-eat
3.5. Phage mixture suppresses growth and regrowth of M. morganii subsp. morganii
ur
Growth was suppressed by each phage or both together between 4 and 6 days of incubation (P
< 0.05). However, after 6 days, M. morganii showed regrowth and reached around 8 log
CFU/mL after 12 days of storage in samples treated with single phage; moreover, differences
from control cultures were not significant at 10 and 12 days (P > 0.05). Phage mixture
treatment using both ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 suppressed the growth of M. morganii throughout
the 12-day storage less than 5 log CFU/mL (P < 0.05). These results suggest that resistance
was developed in the samples treated with single phage, but both together were more effective
then measured optical densities at 595 nm and calculated regrowth rates over 120 h in 96-well
11
Journal Pre-proof
microtiter plate (Table 2). These results show that regrowth rates of single phage treatment
was 27.6% at 120 h post inoculation; however, phage mixture reduced the frequency of
3.6. Phage mixture controls growth of M. morganii subsp. morganii and prevents
Figure 5 shows changes in cell counts and histamine concentrations in canned tuna
treated with or without the phage mixture at 12°C or 20°C. At 12°C, in canned tuna without
of
phage infection, cell counts exceeded 8 log CFU/g and histamine began to accumulate after 3
days storage. After 5 days, bacterial growth reached 9.0 log CFU/g and histamine
ro
concentration in canned tuna exceeded 4,000 mg/kg. However, infection with the phage
-p
mixture significantly decreased cell counts (P < 0.05). Histamine could not be detected during
the first 4 days. Only a slight amount of histamine was detected after 5 days (Fig. 5A and 5B).
re
At 20°C, M. morganii rapidly grew and reached 8 log CFU/g after 24 h in
lP
uninfected control samples. Histamine concentrations were 625 mg/kg after 24 h and more
than 3,000 mg/kg after 48 h. In phage-infected canned tuna, growth was significantly
na
inhibited. M. morganii decreased to 3.5 log CFU/g from 5.9 log CFU/g after 36 h, but it
increased to 5.3 log CFU/g 12 h later. Histamine accumulation in phage-treated canned tuna
ur
meats was significantly lower than that in control samples (P < 0.05), only 60 mg/kg at 48 h
Jo
3.7. Phage mixture controls growth of M. morganii subsp. morganii and prevents
Figure 6 shows changes of total viable counts, viable cell counts of M. morganii,
and histamine concentration during storage of fresh, raw tuna at 20°C. Initial total viable
counts were about 5 log CFU/g and reached about 9 log CFU/g during 36 h of storage.
total viable count of control and phage treatment samples (Fig. 6A). Initial counts of M.
morganii in control tuna were 3.4 log CFU/g, and that in tuna treated with phage mixture was
12
Journal Pre-proof
2.6 log CFU/g (P < 0.05), respectively. After that, phage treatment conditions showed
20°C. Histamine was detected at 24 h in both phage-treated and untreated tuna, but phage
accumulated in the control sample, but its accumulation in the phage-treated sample was
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
13
Journal Pre-proof
4. Discussion
phage ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4. PFGE revealed that both isolated phages were jumbo phages with
genomes larger than 200 kbp (Yuan and Gao, 2017). Isolations of jumbo phages are rare
because their large virions tend to prevent visible plaque formation and passage through
membrane filters (Serwer et al., 2007). ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 may not be able to pass 0.22 µm
pore size membrane filters (Fig. 1A). In this study, we used the 0.45 µm pore size membrane
filters, allowing the successful isolation of jumbo M. morganii subsp. morganii phages. The
of
biology of jumbo phages is not well understood, but they have been shown to differ from
smaller, classical phages (Yuan and Gao, 2017). To our knowledge, this is the first report of
ro
jumbo M. morganii subsp. morganii phages; further studies will reveal more about their
-p
biology.
Phage mixtures are an attractive tool for the prevention of phage resistance in
re
bacteria. O’Flynn et al. (2004) observed frequencies of bacteriophage insensitive mutants for
lP
single-phage were between 1.2×10−6 and 3.3×10−4, but with double infections, mutant
frequencies were between 1.1×10−6 and 1.5×10−6. Moreover, Tanji et al. (2004) also showed
na
that a phage mixture delayed the emergence of phage-resistant cells, but not all combinations
were effective. The mechanism of this prevention is hypothesized to be that bacteria resistant
ur
to one phage could still be killed by another phage with a different receptor-binding protein.
Jo
When multiple phages are used to control pathogens, a combination of phages that recognize
different host receptors is recommended. Our results showed that the adsorption kinetics
between ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 were different (Fig. 2A). This result suggests that the
receptor-binding mechanisms of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 are likely different from each other.
Our data suggest that the combination of phages ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 has potential
for control of M. morganii subsp. morganii. We confirmed the effect of the phage mixture
combining ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 on inhibition of bacterial growth and histamine accumulation.
Treatment with either single phage inhibited the growth of M. morganii subsp. morganii, but
regrowth of the bacteria eventually occurred. In contrast, the mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4
suppressed the bacterial growth throughout the 12-day incubation period, although cell counts
14
Journal Pre-proof
fluctuated between 3 and 5 log CFU/mL (Fig. 4). This fluctuation in cell counts might imply
coincubation with the host, allowing mutant phages to infect ΦSA012-resistant strains
Our data showed that single phages controlled bacterial growth. However,
Paez-Espino et al. (2015) reported that clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic
of
polymorphisms in sequences targeted by CRISPR, and the presence of more than one type of
ro
phage. Therefore, phage mixtures increase the potential for counterattack against
-p
phage-resistant bacteria by increased genetic or receptor-binding protein divergence. Indeed,
our results showed that the mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 significantly decreased the
re
regrowth rates of M. morganii subsp. morganii during phage treatment (Table 2).
lP
morganii in tuna (Fig. 5 and 6). To confirm whether the regrowing M. morganii subsp.
na
infection by ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 by spot testing. All 26 bacterial isolates were sensitive (data
ur
not shown). We hypothesize that this is because the phages were not diffusing effectively for
Jo
immotility, so that bacteria were only subject to infection on the surface of the tuna. This is
consistent with high phage concentrations being important for control of foodborne pathogens
in foods (Hagens and Loessner, 2010); our previous report also showed that antimicrobial
Our results showed that phage mixture treatment is a promising method for
inhibition of histamine production by M. morganii subsp. morganii in tuna (Fig. 5 and 6).
However, we observed differences of histamine concentration between canned and raw tuna.
At 20°C, the histamine concentration of treated canned tuna was much lower than that of
treated raw tuna. This difference might result from bacteria present in raw tuna other than M.
15
Journal Pre-proof
shown in Figure 6C, the majority of accumulated histamine was produced by M. morganii
subsp. morganii and the phage mixture showed the significant reduction in histamine in raw
tuna. In the future, for more effective inhibition, it will likely be necessary to isolate and
psychrotolerans, which is psychrotolerant (Emborg et al., 2006), and has been found to have
contaminated about 40% of retail seafood in Japan (Kato et al., 2017). We will attempt to
of
bacteria (Yamaki et al., 2014; Yamaki et al., 2015).
In this study, we isolated and characterized two jumbo M. morganii subsp. morganii
ro
phages, ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4. The phage mixture combining ΦMV-1 with ΦMV-4 suppressed
-p
the growth of M. morganii subsp. morganii and significantly reduced histamine accumulation
level in canned and fresh tuna. These results suggest that application of the phage mixture
re
might be an effective way to prevent histamine poisoning by M. morganii subsp. morganii
lP
caused by seafood.
na
Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP26450278
ur
and a Grant-in-Aid for JSPS Research Fellow Grant Number JP16J03433. S. Yamaki is
Jo
supported by a Research Fellowship for Young Scientists of the Japan Society for the
Conflict of Interest
None declared.
16
Journal Pre-proof
References
Biswas, B., Adhya, S., Washart, P., Paul, B., Trostel, A.N., Powell, B., Carlton, R., Merril, C.R.,
Carvalho, C., Susano, M., Fernandes, E., Santos, Gannon, B., S., Nicolau, A., Gibbs, P.,
Teixeira, P. and Azeredo, J., 2010. Method for bacteriophage isolation against target
Chang, H.-Y., Wang, S.-M., Chiu, N.-C., Chung, H.-Y., Wang, H.-K., 2011. Neonatal
of
Morganella morganii sepsis: a case report and review of the literature. Pediatr. Int. 53, 121–
123.
ro
Chibeu, A., Agius, L., Gao, A., Sabour, P.M., Kropinski, A.M., Balamurugan, S., 2013.
-p
Efficacy of bacteriophage LISTEXTM P100 combined with chemical antimicrobials in
reducing Listeria monocytogenes in cooked turkey and roast beef. Int. J. Food. Microbiol.
re
167, 208–214.
lP
D’Aloia, A., Vizzardi, E., Pina, P.D., Bugatti, S., Magro, F.D., Raddino, R., Curnis, A., Cas,
L.D., 2011. A scombroid poisoning causing a life-threatening acute pulmonary edema and
na
Emborg, J., Dalgaard, P., Ahrens, P., 2006. Morganella psychrotolerans sp. nov., a
ur
histamine-producing bacterium isolated from various seafoods. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Micro. 56,
Jo
2473–2479.
Gupta, R. and Prasad, Y., 2011. Efficacy of polyvalent bacteriophage P-27/HP to control
multidrug resistant Staphylococcus aureus associated with human infections. Curr.
Hagens, S. and Loessner, M.J., 2010. Bacteriophage for biocontrol of foodborne pathogens:
Jensen, K.T., Frederiksen, W., Hickman-Brenner, F.W., Steigerwalt, A.G., Riddle, C.F.,
morganii subsp. morganii subsp. nov. and Morganella morganii subsp. sibonii subsp. nov..
17
Journal Pre-proof
Kato, R., Wang, D., Yamaki, S., Kawai, Y., Yamazaki, K., 2017. Distribution on fishery
Kim, M., Kim, S., Park, B., Ryu, S., 2014. Core lipopolysaccharide-specific phage SSU5 as an
Kim, S.-H., An, H., Wei, C.-I., Visessanguan, W., Benjakul, S., Morrissey, M.T., Su, Y.-C.,
of
Pitta, T.P., 2003. Molecular detection of a histamine former, Morganella morganii, in
albacore, mackerel, sardine, and a processing plant. J. Food Sci. 68, 453–457.
ro
Ladero, V., Gómez-Sordo, C., Sánchez-Llana, E., del Rio, B., Redruello, B., Fernández, M.,
-p
Martin, M.C., Alvarez, M.A., 2016. Q69 (an E. faecalis-infecting bacteriophage) as a
biocontrol agent for reducing tyramine in dairy products. Front. Microbiol. 7, 445.
re
Lingohr, E., Frost, S., Johnson, R.P., 2009. Determination of bacteriophage genome size by
lP
pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. In: Clokie M.R., Kropinski A.M. (eds.) Bacteriophages.
from retail markets in the Barcelona area. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 28, 411–418.
Jo
McVay, C.S., Velásquez, M., Fralick, J.A., 2007. Phage therapy of Pseudomonas aeruginosa
infection in a mouse burn wound model. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 51, 1934–1938.
Müller, H. E., 1986. Occurrence and pathogenic role of Morganella-Proteus-Providencia
Nakakoshi, M., Nishioka, H., Katayama, E., 2011. New versatile staining reagents for
biological transmission electron microscopy that substitute for uranyl acetate. J. Electron
Niven, C.F., Jeffrey, M.B., Corlett, D.A., 1981. Differential plating medium for quantitative
O’Flynn, G., Ross, R.P., Fitzgerald, G.F., Coffey, A., 2004. Evaluation of a cocktail of three
18
Journal Pre-proof
bacteriophages for biocontrol of Escherichia coli O157:H7. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70,
3417–3424.
Oliveira, M., Viñas, I., Colàs, P., Anguera, M., Usall, J., Abadias, M., 2014. Effectiveness of a
bacteriophage in reducing Listeria monocytogenes on fresh-cut fruits and fruit juices. Food
Oliveira, H., Pinto, G., Oliveira, A., Noben, J.-P., Hendrix, H., Lavigne, R., Łobocka, M.,
Kropinski, A.M., Azeredo, J., 2017. Characterization and genomic analyses of two newly
of
Autographivirinae subfamilies. Sci. Rep. 7, 46157.
Paez-Espino, D., Sharon, I., Morovic, W., Stahl, B., Thomas, B.C., Barrangou, R., Banfield, J.,
ro
2015. CRISPR immunity drives rapid phage genome evolution in Streptococcus
-p
thermophilus. mBio 6, e00262-15.
R Core Team, 2016. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation
re
for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/
lP
475–482.
Sánchez-Guerrero, I.M., Vidal, J.B., Escudero, A.I., 1997. Scombroid fish poisoning: A
ur
Serwer, P., Hayes, S.J., Thomas, H.A., Hardies, S.C., 2007. Propagating the missing
C.-H., 2012. Isolation and characterization of km18p, a novel lytic phage with therapeutic
e46537.
Soni, K.A. and Nannapaneni, R., 2010. Bacteriophage significantly reduces Listeria
Soni, K.A., Desai, M., Oladunjoye, A., Skrobot, F., Nannapaneni, R., 2012. Reduction of
19
Journal Pre-proof
Takeuchi, I., Osada, K., Azam, A. H., Asakawa, H., Miyanaga, K., Tanji, Y., 2016. The
Tanji, Y., Shimada, T., Yoichi, M., Miyanaga, K., Hori, K., Unno, H., 2004. Toward rational
control of Escherichia coli O157:H7 by a phage cocktail. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 64,
270–274.
Yamaki, S., Omachi, T., Kawai, Y., Yamazaki, K., 2014. Characterization of a novel
of
Morganella morganii bacteriophage FSP1 isolated from river water. FEMS Microbiol. Lett.
359, 166–172.
ro
Yamaki, S., Kawai, Y., Yamazaki, K., 2015. Characterization of a novel bacteriophage, Phda1,
-p
infecting the histamine-producing Photobacterium damselae subsp. damselae. J. Appl.
morganii and histamine accumulation in tuna meat by treatment with a lytic bacteriophage.
Yuan, Y. and Gao, M., 2017. Jumbo bacteriophages: an overview. Front. Microbiol. 8, 403.
ur
Jo
20
Journal Pre-proof
Figure legends
Fig. 1. Transmission electron micrographs of MV-1 (A) and MV-4 (B). PFGE image (C)
for genome-size estimation. Bars, 200 nm. Lane 1, 2, 3, and 4 indicates Lambda PFG marker
(New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA), MV-1 genome, MV-4 genome, and Marker 7
Fig. 2. Adsorption kinetics (A) and one-step growth curves (B) of MV-1 and MV-4.
of
Symbols represent MV-1 (◆) and MV-4 (●). Rate of free phage was calculated by
dividing the phage titer at each time (P) by the phage titer at 0 min (P0). Results are shown as
ro
the means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments.
-p
Fig. 3. Thermal (A, C) and pH (B, D) stability of MV-1 (A, B) and MV-4 (C, D). Symbols
re
represent samples heated at 40°C (◆), 50°C (■), 60°C (▲), and 70°C (●). Results are shown
lP
Fig. 4. The growth of M. morganii not treated or treated with ΦMV-1, ΦMV-4, or the
equivalent mixture of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 in TSB supplemented with 1% histidine (pH 6.5)
ur
at 12°C for 12 days. Bars represent cell counts of M. morganii treated with ΦMV-1 (dark
Jo
gray), ΦMV-4 (light gray), ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4 (white), or without phages (black). The
results are shown as means ± standard deviations from three independent experiments.
canned tuna during storage at 12°C (A and B) or 20°C (C and D). Symbols represent cell
counts with (●) or without (◆) phage mixture. Bars represent histamine concentrations with
(white) or without (black) the phage treatment. The results are shown as means ± standard
deviations from three independent experiments. †Below detection limits for cell counts (2 log
21
Journal Pre-proof
Fig. 6. Growth of total aerobic bacteria (A), M. morganii (B), and histamine accumulation (C)
on fresh tuna during storage at 20°C. Symbols represent viable cell counts with (●) or without
(◆) the phage mixture. Bars represent histamine concentration with (white) or without (black)
the phage mixture. The results are shown as means ± standard deviations from three
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
22
Journal Pre-proof
Table 1. Bacterial strains used in this study and host ranges of ΦMV-1 and ΦMV-4.
Host range†
Bacterial species Strain
ΦMV-1 ΦMV-4
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii NBRC3848T +++ ++
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii NBRC3168 +++ ++
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii ATCC25829 +/ +/
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii JNBP_03126‡ +++
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii JNBP_03128‡ +++ ++
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii JNBP_03133‡ +++ +
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii JNBP_03145‡ +++ +/
of
Morganella morganii subsp. morganii JNBP_03147‡ +++
Morganella morganii subsp. sibonii JCM16939T
ro
Morganella psychrotolerans JCM16473T +
JCM1669T
Proteus mirabillis
-p
Proteus vulgaris ATCC33420
re
Proteus hauseri ATCC13315
Providencia rustigianii JCM3953T
lP
Citrobacter freundii
Cronobactor sakazakii ATCC51329T
Jo
23
Journal Pre-proof
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
24
Journal Pre-proof
Table 2. Suppression of regrowth (OD595 > 0.05) by phage mixture during incubation in 96-well
microplates.
Percent of wells with growth (OD595 > 0.05)
Phage
0h 24 h 48 h 72 h 96 h 120 h
MV-1 0a* 0a 4.2 ± 1.9a 20.8 ± 3.7a 23.4 ± 1.3a 27.6 ± 2.7a
*Different letters indicate significant differences (p < 0.05) for each time point between each
phage-treated condition.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
25
Journal Pre-proof
Highlights:
Phage mixture could prevent histamine accumulation in canned and fresh tuna.
of
ro
-p
re
lP
na
ur
Jo
26
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6