Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • College of Accountancy Business Economics and International Hospitality Management

    Uploaded by

    Marie Shella
    12 views3 pages
    This document summarizes the results of a chi-square goodness of fit test. It presents the null and alternative hypotheses, which state that there is no/is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies. One study found a significant difference with p < 0.05, so the null was rejected. A second study found no significant difference with p > 0.05, so the null was accepted. Both correctly concluded whether a difference existed based on the p-value and hypothesis test.

    Original Description:

    Original Title

    n/A

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes the results of a chi-square goodness of fit test. It presents the null and alternative hypotheses, which state that there is no/is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies. One study found a significant difference with p < 0.05, so the null was rejected. A second study found no significant difference with p > 0.05, so the null was accepted. Both correctly concluded whether a difference existed based on the p-value and hypothesis test.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    12 views3 pages

    College of Accountancy Business Economics and International Hospitality Management

    Uploaded by

    Marie Shella
    This document summarizes the results of a chi-square goodness of fit test. It presents the null and alternative hypotheses, which state that there is no/is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies. One study found a significant difference with p < 0.05, so the null was rejected. A second study found no significant difference with p > 0.05, so the null was accepted. Both correctly concluded whether a difference existed based on the p-value and hypothesis test.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as pdf or txt
    of 3

    Republic of the Philippines

    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY


    COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND
    INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
    CITE Building, Pablo Borbon Main 1, Rizal Avenue, Batangas City

    CHI-SQUARE GOODNESS OF FIT TEST

    A. State the Null hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis

    Null Hypothesis
    Ho: There is no significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.

    Alternative Hypothesis
    Ha: There is a significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.

    B. Write the result of the study

    Table below shows that the Observed Frequencies, N=80, the Expected Frequencies, N=40 and the residual is 20.
    Therefore, the difference between the Observed Frequency and the Expected Frequency is 1.
    Republic of the Philippines
    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND
    INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
    CITE Building, Pablo Borbon Main 1, Rizal Avenue, Batangas City

    C. Since p-value = 0.000008 < 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis.

    D. We conclude that there is a significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency. N=80
    = 20.000, p-value > 0.05.

    A. State the null hypothesis and Alternative Hypothesis

    Null Hypothesis
    Ho: There is no significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.

    Alternative Hypothesis
    Ha: There is a significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.

    B. Write the result of the study.

    The Table below shows the Observed Frequencies, N=65, the Expected Frequencies, N=32.5, and the difference
    between the observed and expected frequencies for the 1-plasma and 2-LCD categories.
    Republic of the Philippines
    BATANGAS STATE UNIVERSITY
    COLLEGE OF ACCOUNTANCY BUSINESS ECONOMICS AND
    INTERNATIONAL HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT
    CITE Building, Pablo Borbon Main 1, Rizal Avenue, Batangas City

    C. Since p-value = 0.535 >0.05, we accept the null hypothesis

    D. Therefore, there is no significant difference between the observed frequency and the expected frequency.
    Investigation of whether people perceive a difference in the picture quality of plasma and LCD televisions.

    TIVES, SHELLA MARIE

    VALENZUELA, SARAH JOEI E.

    You might also like