Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Whistleblower Allegations 03 March 2021
Whistleblower Allegations 03 March 2021
Whistleblower Allegations 03 March 2021
A. The Chest deems itself a lead agent in the vetting of Organizations - Due
Diligence - yet it presented a Balance Sheet at its Annual General Meeting
that the new Chairperson described as " good and strong ". The Non-Profit
Organisations ACT of 1997 in section 17 and 18 requires an audited
financial statement.
3. Financial Management
A. With this good balance sheet, why still are staff threatened for the last 10
months with retrenchments?
4. Projects and Programmes not in line with the Chest' Strategic and
Operational Plan
A. The Homeless Project - the exorbitant investment that does not fall within the
auspices of the Chest. Stipends, groceries, and other social expenses
(wedding rings, attire and ceremonies) that were paid to beneficiaries without
consultation. Yet key Organisations who work within this sector has not been
funded as a grantee because the Chest does not have cash flow.
A full list is available of these unfunded projects strongly aligned to the CEO.
A. The Chest once enjoyed an open grantmaking process. The selection process
was administrated by a funding committee comprised of the grant-making
department, senior management, and the board. This ensured integrity,
accountability, and transparency. More notably, an openness that cultured an
ownership from staff and the board. Under the CEO's leadership, a full
autocratic system was employed and he owns sole decision-making. As with
all other processes - top-down. Consequently, Senior managers and skilled
staff and their professional opinions are grossly disregarded and undermined.
B. For example, the Smith family who allegedly are receiving 7 bursaries for all
its children including stipends and equipment. Who is this family? How does
the Chest justify that an entire family is sponsored to attend a private school
for special needs? How does the Board justify a stipend of R7500 to one child
monthly? Is this common practice at the Chest?
3. Nepotism
A. The Board must take full responsibility for the lack of human resource
management. The Chest holds a staff compliment who is disgruntled, who
feels victimized and abused. The board must further take full responsibility for
the lack of wellness of staff in this absence of a HR function.
B. According to the CEO only 5-7 people have worked over the lockdown
period. Staff are consistently threatened with this allegation made by the
CEO.
C. Staff feels that they have been coerced into pitching at public events
regardless of a global pandemic. Many staff chose to do so in fear even
though they have comorbidities. The CEO made it very clear that staff is now
contending for their jobs. This has created a toxic work environment.
D. Very skilled staff feel that their abilities are being undermined.
Recommendations
We would like to draw your attention to the
seriousness of these allegations. We would
like to further inform you that we will consult
with the four board members to see if any of
the contents in this communication is part of
the reasons they have resigned. We also
further want to bring to your attention that
the Chest operates on public funding that is
directed under the Non-Profit Act of South
Africa. The Chest, in addition, must adhere
to the Labour Relations Act and the Basic
Conditions of Employment Act.
More primarily, that the staff that continue to fall prey to unethical practices within
the NGO sector are spoken for.