Microfocus X-Ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 7

10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in


Materials Research
M. WEVERS, P. DE MEESTER
Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,

Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering,


·Home W. de Croylaan 2,

·Table of Contents 3001 Leuven, Belgium

·Methods and Instrumentation


R. SWENNEN

Katholieke Universiteit Leuven,


Department of Geology, Fysico-chemical Geology
Celestijnenlaan 200C,

3001 Leuven,

Belgium

Scientific researchers: M. Van Geet, H. Van


Oosterwyck, and A.-H. Benouali
Contact

Introduction.
Computer tomography, initially implemented in the medical field, today is also used in materials research.
Moreover the technology has been improved by implementing the microfocus X-ray sources in the computer
tomography facilities. In microfocus computer tomography (mCT) the resolution of a system can be in the order
of 10 mm x10 mm x10 mm depending on the object size, which is much better compared to the typical 60 mm x
60 mm x 1 mm resolution of the medical CT. The resolution of the two microfocus computer tomography
systems available at the Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering (K.U. Leuven), being the desktop
SkyScan 1072 computerised microtomograph (for small objects up to 4 cm3) and the AEA Tomohawk CT
system on the Philips HOMX 161 microfocus system (for large objects up to 5 kg), is indicated in Table 1.

Object size (mm diameter) Resolution in one slice (mm) = 2 x pixel size
Medical CT Skyscan AEA Tomohawk
2 120 10 10
4 120 16 12
8 120 31 23
10 120 39 28
20 120 78 58
40 156 156 114
60 234 234 172
100 390 - 286
130 508 - 371
Table 1: Achievable resolution with the microfocus CT equipments available at the K.U.
Leuven for different object sizes.

In this paper the usefulness of the mCT in different fields of material science is discussed with emphasis on
sedimentary geology, research on bone remodelling around biomedical implants, research on light weight metal
foams and electronic components. The various examples illustrate how mCT can be used quantitatively to
investigate the microstructure and the behaviour of micro-heterogeneous structural materials. The vast number
of examples also reflects the multidisciplinary use of the equipment and indicates how progress in one field can
be beneficial to the other. Before this discussion some techniques will be presented to improve the image quality
and to minimise artifacts.

Optimising techniques to enhance mCT images and to reduce artifacts.

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 1/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

If some internal feature of a material needs to be determined accurately in size or the material needs to be
characterised based on density measurements for instance, artifacts in the reconstruction of a CT image must be
avoided or minimised.
Ring artifacts are caused by inhomogeneities of the detector and are minimised by randomly moving the object
and with it the field of detector used (Skyscan, 1997; Burch et al., 1998)

Star or streak artifacts are caused by secondary radiation that augments the noise and creates the artifacts. Metal
filters such as aluminium (Al) or copper (Cu) placed in front of the detector can suppress to a major extent the
star artifacts because they help to reduce the secondary radiation. However, some of the primary radiation will
also be attenuated and as a consequence the contrast will be lowered. (ISO/WD 15708-2 and J. Baruchel et al.,
2000)

Beam hardening is a consequence of the polychromatic X-rays used in a CT. The differential attenuation of
photons within the investigated object leads to the rapid attenuation of the lowest energy photons and hence to
the gradual increase of the mean energy. Beam hardening or cupping effect is the anomalous decreasing
attenuation toward the center of a homogeneous object and to reduce it a mathematical correction at some stage
in the reconstruction process can be very effective. Many systems allow the option of applying such a
correction. Beam hardening can also be reduced by going to higher source energies or filtering the low energy
content of the incident radiation with metal filters placed between the X-ray source and the object, or both.
(ISO/WD 15708-2 and J. Baruchel et al., 2000)

Microfocus computer tomography in sedimetary geology.

Current research of mCT in geological sciences focuses on the characterisation of reservoir rocks (Tricart et al.,
2000; Van Geet et al., 2000a) like sandstones, carbonates and coal. The most important advantage of the mCT is
the possibility of 3D visualisation and quantification of porosity and mineralogical pore-relating phases.
Classical geological studies are based on 2D light microscopy techniques on thin sections and polished surfaces.
To validate the mCT-data, 2D slices will be correlated with other 2D classical techniques, like light microscopy
and scatter electron microscopy. Such a correlation is currently worked out for coal samples (Van Geet et al.,
2000b) and will be performed on classical sand and carbonate reservoirs and on igneous rocks. To perform such
correlations, however, an optimisation of the image quality was originally the most important research topic. In
this respect two artifacts mostly degrade the image quality of reservoir rocks. The first one is a star artifact
caused by secondary radiation. This artifact is especially related to high attenuating materials and consequently
important for studies on sedimentary rocks with iron-containing minerals (pyrite). The second artifact is beam
hardening, which is again most pronounced in high attenuating materials like quartz, carbonates and iron
containing minerals. The artifacts are reduced by placing metal foils in front of the detector system, which cut
off the lower X-ray energies that cause the artifacts (Van Geet et al., 2000a).

Once a good image quality is realised, characterisation of the different mineral


phases can be carried out.
However, the linear attenuation coefficient of mineral phases is a poorly known parameter. As the latter depends
mainly on the density and the atomic number of the studied object and the used X-ray energy, a dual energy
technique is worked out (Alvarez and Mackovski, 1975; Coenen and Maas, 1994; Van Geet et al., 2000a). Here,
the same sample is scanned at two different energy levels and, after a calibration procedure, the density and
atomic number information of the internal features on voxel level can be extracted. The data of the density
measurements are the most reliable, because this information is incorporated in the high energy photons, which
have a higher flux when using metal foils as filters. Figure 1 shows the correlation between the real density of
some calibration samples and the linear attenuation coefficient at two different energies. Figure 2 shows the
enhanced correlation by using the dual energy technique. The density is obviously easier to interpret since it
corresponds to parameters often used in petrophysical research.

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 2/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

Fig 1: Plot of density versus linear attenuation coefficient Fig 2: Plot of density versus measured density by
for 15 calibration materials at two different energies. means of dual energy for 15 calibration materials.

Further research on the use of mCT will be focused on the characterisation of fractured reservoirs, which
involves a 3D quantification of fracture sizes and orientation. Other research topics will focus on dynamic
processes. Firstly, it will focus on a two component system, namely free water uptake measurements, which
enable the visualisation and quantification of moisture content profiles of several materials. Subsequently, a
three component system can be analysed, like enhanced oil recovery, in which oil displacement by means of
different gases or fluids is tested. Some examples are given here, which illustrate the usefulness of a three-
dimensional visualisation of geological samples. Other examples can be found in Van Geet et al. (2000a).

A first example (figure 3) shows a porous carbonate of 8 mm in diameter. At this magnification, a voxel size of
about 22 mm in three dimensions is achieved. The carbonate is build up of oolites and fossils, especially shell
material. The shell material is now dissolved and represents a secondary pore. Oolites are small spherical
carbonate parts. Here they have been dissolved and cause the high porosity. The pores are clearly visualised by
their white colour, which represents the attenuation of air.

Fig 3: 3D reconstruction through an oolitic Fig 4: Oolitic carbonate sample with


limestone that clearly shows the porosity about 20% bulk volume porosity. Some
(white colour) of the oolites and shell material. oolites are now filled with barite (blue
colour) and the sample also shows a
gypsum crystal (arrow).

A second example (figure 4) shows another oolitic reservoir rock, which shows some precipitates within the
pores. The dual energy technique has been used to discriminate several minerals and to estimate the porosity of
the sample. A gypsum crystal (arrow), barite precipitates (blue colour) and carbonate were found and the
porosity was estimated at about 20% (Van Geet et al., 2000).

Microfocus computer tomography for research on bone remodelling around


biomedical implants.

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 3/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

Recent research has proved that the mCT can be of great value to study the microstructure and the remodelling
behaviour of trabecular bone (Feldkamp et al. 1989, Rüegsegger et al. 1996). The high resolution enables
individual trabecels to be seen. For the first time mCT has been used to study the bone structure around titanium
oral screw implants (Van Oosterwyck et al. 1999). Bone-implant specimens were scanned with a resolution of
60 mm. Due to the large difference in attenuation coefficient between titanium and bone it is not easy to obtain
optimal images. The trabecular bone structure as well as the differences in bone densities in the screw windings
are clearly visible. The advantages of the mCT in this research are: speed, nondestructive character, complete
threedimensional characterisation of the bone structure around the implant, reconstruction of 2D images in
oblique slices and 3D reconstruction facilities. (figure 5 and 6)

Fig 5: 3D reconstruction of mCT data of Fig 6: 2D slice based on mCT data of


Fig 7: Histological slice of bone with implant
trabecular bone around titanium implant and bone with implant
some indication for 2D slices.

The obtained results are promising and show a good correlation with the histological slices. (figure 7) The mCT
therefore offers a valuable alternative for the classic histological techniques to study the osseointegration
process with implants. The mCT also allows an in vivo evolution of the bone remodelling around implants when
small animals are involved, reducing hereby drastically the number of animals to be sacrificed. The mCT data
are also being used to generate precise finite element models of the trabecular bone structure around the implant.
(figure 8a and 8b)

Fig 8a: mCT slice after contrast Fig 8b: Finite element modelling of the
enhancement of implant in trabecular microstructure revealed with mCT
bone structure.

In this way the stress transfer between implant and bone can be analysed on a microstructural level. The
validation of the FE models can then be carried out as well: the measured displacements in a mechanical test on
a scanned specimen have to be compared with the displacements calculated via a finite element model of the
same specimen and the same loading. The accuracy of the finite element modelling can therefrom be retrieved
and this approach opens the possibility to simulate numerically biological mechanisms like adaptive bone
remodelling.

Microfocus computer tomography of aluminium foams and electronic components.


Metallic foams are porous metals with high porosity (from 50 to 99 %). In the past few years the interest in
metal foams, especially made of aluminium or aluminium alloys, has increased considerably. The unique
properties of aluminium foams like high stiffness to weight ratio, high energy dissipation, low density, reduced
acoustic, thermal and electrical conductivity, chemical resistance, easy recycling etc..., make them potentially
https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 4/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

useful in many high technology industries such as automotive and aerospace.

The efficient use of foams requires a detailed understanding of their mechanical behaviour. Previous models
developed to predict the mechanical performance of foams have been dependent on the variation of the apparent
density, the properties of the solid material from which the cell face is made, and the cell geometry. The
geometrical features include cell shape and size, distribution in cell size, defect and flaws in the cell structure as
well as the microstructural parameter like cell wall and edge thickness and material distribution between cell
face and cell edge. Therefore a clever characterisation of this material is required. (A.-H. Benouali et al., 2000)

The mCT provides images of the internal details of Al-foams without special specimen preparation. Figure 9
shows mCT images of Al-foam samples made by a casting process. The pictures reveal a broad density
distribution through the samples. One can also distinguish that the cells are oriented in a preferred direction and
that there is a broad cell size distribution.

Fig 9: mCT images of cross-sections of Al-foams made by casting process; (a)


sample with average density of 0.10 g/cm3, (b) sample with average density of
0.18 g/cm3, (c) sample with average density of 0.31 g/cm3.
Fig 10: mCT images of cross-sections of Al-foams made by a powder metallurgy
process showing the presence of big holes in the foam structure: (a) sample with
average density of 0.35 g/cm3, (b) sample with average density of 0.22 g/cm3.

mCT images of Al-foam samples made by the powder metallurgical route are given in figure 10. The samples
have an average density of resp; 0.22 and 0.35 g/cm3. Two slices at two different heights have been extracted for
each sample. The cell size distribution seems to be homogeneous but the presence of big holes around the centre
of the structure leads to a broad density distribution through the specimens. These holes might be caused by the
foaming process itself because the latter is stopped by simply allowing the mould to cool. The temperature in
the centre of this mould is still sufficiently high to enabling the foaming process to continue while it has stopped
elsewhere.

Microfocus computed tomography provides 3D information of the scanned specimen concerning cell
arrangement like orientation, gradient, homogeneity, etc.. Images of contiguous planes can be stacked by mean
of a reconstruction algorithm to form 3D images of a section or if the entire part has been scanned, a full
volumetric image of the specimen (figures 11).

Fig 11: 3D reconstruction of an Al-foam structure produced by casting process based on


50 CT slices with a numerical cut-out.

Once the data are imported, the reconstruction algorithm can quickly generate slices in any orthogonal plane or
at oblique angles through the 3D data volume as well as creating cut-outs in the reconstructed 3D foam structure
(figures 12).

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 5/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

Fig 12: Numerical oblique slices through the 3D data volume of an Al-foam structure produced by powder
metallurgy process.

Further image processing can create binary images which can be used for quantitative measurements. Some
results based on the binary image of figure 13b are presented in figure 14 and 15.

Fig 13: Manually closing and opening of cells on the


binary image of an Al-foam slice (casting process)

A temperature sensor for a laundry washing machine needs to work reliable. Therefore the polymer which
encapsulates the sensing device needs to be void/porosity free. Using only X-ray projection radiography to
reveal those is very hard (figure 16), taking 2D slices of this component in the sensing area leads to a clear
identification and even reveals the distribution of the voids over the cross section. Based on this information
even temperature profiles can be pre-calculated (prior to production) or back-calculated (in case of failure).


Fig
14: Histogram of the cell area of
the Al-foam slice of figure 14b.


Fig
15: Histogram of the equivalent
Fig 17: 2D computer tomography
diameter of the Al-foam slice of
Fig 16: X-ray projection radiograph slice at the top of the temperature
figure 14b.
of temperature sensor sensor.

Conclusions.
This paper discusses the possibilities of microfocus computer tomography in materials research. In this large
interdisciplinary field not only high quality 2D and 3D images of the internal structure of the material can be
obtained but with intelligent processing of the data even quantitative information. Several attempts in this

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 6/7
10/29/22, 8:41 PM Microfocus X-ray Computer Tomography in Materials Research

direction have been pointed out and are subject of present research projects within the Katholieke Universiteit
Leuven.

Acknowledgements:
The fund for Scientific Research (FWO) in Flanders (project number G.027.97) and the Flemish Institute for
Scientific Reseach and Technology (project number IWT 950330) are acknowledged for the financial support of
this research.

References.

1. Skyscan, 1977, Skyscan 1072 Desktop Microscope-microtomograph: instruction manual. Skyscan, Aartselaar,
43 pp.
2. Burch, S.F., Ramsay, A;T., Whittaker, J., 1998, Tomohawk user manual for Leuven University: a user manual
produced for Leuven University, Belgium, AEA Technology, OXON, 89 pp.
3. NDT-Radiation Methods - Computed Tomography - Part 2: Examination Practices, ISO/WD 15708-2, pp. 8-9
4. J. Baruchel, Jean-Yves Buffière, E. Maire, P. Merle, G. Peix, X-ray tomography in Material Science, General
Principles, Hermes Science Publications, Paris 2000, ISBN 2-7462-0115-1, pp 15-21
5. Alvarez, R.E. and Macovski, A., 1976. Energy-selective reconstructions in X-ray computerized tomography.
Phys. Med. Biol., 21, pp. 733-744
6. Coenen, J.C.G. and Maas, J.G., 1994. Material classification by dual energy computerized X-ray tomography.
International symposium on computerized tomography for industrial applications, pp. 120-127
7. Tricart, J.P., Van Geet, M. and Sasov, A., 2000. Using Micro-CT for 3D characterisation of geological materials.
Microscopy and analysis, May 2000, 65, pp. 31
8. Van Geet, M., Swennen, R. and Wevers, M., 2000a. Quantitative analysis of reservoir rocks by microfocus X-
ray computerised tomography. Sed. Geol., 132, pp. 25-36
9. Van Geet, M., Swennen, R. and David, P., 2000b. Quantitative coal characterisation by means of microfocus X-
ray computer tomography (mCT), colour image analysis (CIA) and back scattered electron microscopy (BSE).
International Journal of Coal Geology, submitted.
10. Feldkamp, L. A., Goldstein, S.A., Parfitt, A.M., Jesion, G., Kleerekoper, M., The direct examination of three-
dimensional bone architectures in vitro by computed tomography, J. Bone Mineral Res. , 1989, 4, pp. 3-11
11. Rüegsegger, P., Koller, B., Müller, R., A microtomography system for the nondestructive evaluation of bone
architecture, Calcif. Tissue Int. 1996, 58, pp. 24-29
12. Van Oosterwyck, H., Duyck, J., Vander Sloten, J., Van der Perre, G., Jansen, J., Wevers, M., Naert, I., The use of
microfocus computerized tomography as a new technique to characterize bone tissue around oral implants,
Journal of Oral Implantology, 2000, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 5-12
13. A.-H. Benouali, L. Froyen, M. Wevers, Microfocus computed tomography of Aluminium foams, in X-ray
Tomography in Materials Science, Chapitre 10, ed. J. Baruchel et al., Hermes Science Publications, Paris 2000,
ISBN 2-7462-0115-1, pp. 139-153.
© AIPnD , created by NDT.net |Home|    |Top|

https://www.ndt.net/article/wcndt00/papers/idn399/idn399.htm 7/7

You might also like