This paper reviews theories of power in communication and argues that existing approaches have not adequately captured the complexity of power as a concept in communication. Specifically, current scholarship either treats power as self-explanatory, focuses on only one dimension of power by disregarding its multiple aspects, or acknowledges power's complexity but fails to synthesize different theories of power. The paper aims to address this gap.
This paper reviews theories of power in communication and argues that existing approaches have not adequately captured the complexity of power as a concept in communication. Specifically, current scholarship either treats power as self-explanatory, focuses on only one dimension of power by disregarding its multiple aspects, or acknowledges power's complexity but fails to synthesize different theories of power. The paper aims to address this gap.
This paper reviews theories of power in communication and argues that existing approaches have not adequately captured the complexity of power as a concept in communication. Specifically, current scholarship either treats power as self-explanatory, focuses on only one dimension of power by disregarding its multiple aspects, or acknowledges power's complexity but fails to synthesize different theories of power. The paper aims to address this gap.
Kucherenko, Svetlana. (2016). Power in communication: Revisiting power studies.
Topics in Linguistics. 17. 10.1515/topling-2016-0007. This paper revisits a range
of theories of power in communication and argues that there has been no methodology able to grasp the multiplicity of power in communication as a concept. As a result, the present scholarship on power in communication is characterized by a multiplicity of approaches that a) use the concept of power as a self-explanatory or vague concept in the analysis of several interactional phenomena; b) draw on a particular approach to power, disregarding multiple workings of power; or c) acknowledge the complexity of power and synthesize various approaches to power.