FINALchapter1 5costada 1

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 101

1

CHAPTER I

THE PROBLEM AND ITS SCOPE

Introduction

Students are the key assets of universities. The students’ engagement

plays an important role in retaining their confidence to succeed the course that

they’ve taken. According to Gallup (2013) Student engagement is a term used to

describe an individual’s interest and enthusiasm for school, which impacts their

academic performance and behavior engagement is a complex term, making it

all the more difficult to understand.

Career preferences are free opportunity to select a desired career. It is

also a discussion making in a confusing situation which occurs during the senior

year of high school level. When one is confused in choosing a career, he relies

on his friends and relatives and does not want to set a goal to be achieved and

not to be able to excel in academics. (Alfred-Davidson, 2009.)

Furthermore, the 2011 World Youth report refers to the need for youth to

be appropriately skilled in order to facilitate their entry into the labor market. It

recommends that training systems be in place not only to prepare youth for entry

into work, but provide pathways for continual learning over a lifetime in response

to changing technologies and global requirements. According to McGrath (2012)

technical vocational livelihood encompasses the myriad forms of learning aimed

at participation in the words of work.


2

The quality of student’s engagement remains top priority for educators. It

is meant for making a difference locally, regionally, and globally educators,

trainers and researchers have long been interested in exploring variables

contributing effectively in engaging the learners (Crosnoe,et, al., 2004)

Most recently, there are issues about the technical vocational livelihood

track that are not known to everyone. The lowly standing of vocational education

continues to be an enduring problem despite the improvement of TVL. It

proposes that students after completing TVL track upon proceeding into college,

the predicament is that courses that are offered in college tend to be inapplicable

from the tracks and strands that they’ve taken. According to Martinez (2012) the

real motive behind the K to 12 education system is to further intensify labor

export, this time systematically targeting the country’s young labor force, the K to

12 system sadly undermines the youth’s very significant role in nation-building

because it is geared toward providing cheap semi-skilled and unskilled youth

labor to the global market instead of for domestic development. Additionally, the

students who are choosing this track may not be aware of the future courses and

opportunities therein.

Thus, it is the concern of this study to determine the correlation of

student’s preference on TVL track and academic engagement of students from

Department of Technology Teacher Education.


3

Theoretical Framework

This study focused on the correlates of student preference on technical

vocational livelihood track and the factors influencing the students’ academic

engagement. It is anchored on the following theories: Banduras Social Cognitive

Theory, Ichheiser's theory of social perception, Lev Vygotsky theory of the

students’ engagement and Supers Developmental Theory.

As cited by Mcleod (2011) Banduras social learning theory posits that

people learn from another, via observation, imitation and modelling. The theory

has often been called a bridge between behaviourist and cognitive learning

theories because it encompasses attention, memory, motivation. People learn

through observing other people’s behaviour, attitude and outcomes of those

behaviours. Most human behaviour is learned observationally through modelling:

from observing others, one’s form an idea of how new behaviours are performs,

and on later occasions, this coded information serves as guide for action,

On the other hand, social learning theory explains that human behaviour

in terms of continuous interaction between cognitive, behavioural, and

environmental influences, this interaction will help their preference on TVL track

that relates to their academic engagement.

As cited by Boski (1989), the Ichheiser’s theory of social perception

discusses the potential contributions to experimental social cognitive psychology.

Although Ichheiser’s never conducted an experiment in person perception or

attributional processes, he was able to clarify concepts with a precision


4

necessary for factorial experimental design. Among other topics, Ichheiser’s

wrote on conscious vs. nonconscious processes in person perception, natural

and cultural categories vs. trait dimensions, the social context of achievement

and demystification of success, and the Personality–Social Perception Interface.

According to Ichheiser’s, personality and person perception were two sides of the

same coin.

As cited by Myasnitskaya (2014), in Lev Vygotsky theory of the students’

engagement “We must admit that at the beginning of each age period, there

develops a completely original, exclusive, single, and unique relation, specific to

the given age, between the child and reality, mainly the social reality that

surrounds him. We call this relation the social situation of development at the

given age. The social situation of development represents the initial moment for

all dynamic changes that occur in development during the given period. It

determines wholly and completely the forms and the path along which the child

will acquire ever newer personality characteristics, drawing them from the social

reality as from the basic source of development, the path along which the social

becomes the individual”.

Also, super stressed the need to understand and predict a career. He

defined a career as a sequence of occupation, jobs, and positions held during the

course of a lifetime, including also prevocational and post vocational activities.

Super asserted that what was actually needed in vocational guidance was a

career model, which takes into account the sequence of positions that an

individual occupies during her or his working life. Interest in understanding


5

careers led Super to look into people’s career patterns, which portray one aspect

of vocational development the sequence of changes in occupational level and

field over a period of time. Although initially “set out” by the individuals parental

socioeconomic level patterns are also determined by individuals abilities,

personality traits, and the opportunities to which they are expose. The analysis of

career patterns supported view that the life cycle imposes different vocational

tasks on people at various times of their lives, (Patton, 2006)

Conceptual Framework

To have a better understanding on the flow of this study, a schematic

diagram is illustrated in Figure1. It can be seen in the diagram that there are two

variables being identified. First is the Independent variable which consists of the

respondent’s profile that includes the personal information such as age, course,

sex, family’s monthly income, father’s educational level, mother’s educational

level, father’s occupation, mother’s occupation, and the factors in choosing TVL

and prefer path after graduating the course. Second is the dependent variable

which happens to be the students’ academic engagement of the first year college

students undergone technical vocational livelihood track.

The researchers then presumed that the respondent’s socio-economic

profile and the correlates of students’ preference on TVL track influence the

respondent’s academic engagement


6

Research Paradigm

Independent Variable Dependent Variable

Students’ Academic

I. Personal Profile Engagement


a. Age
A. Interest
b. Sex
B. Study Habits
c. Course C. Academic Ability
d. Family’s Monthly D. Teacher Related
Income
Aspect
e. Father’s Educational E. On Instructional
Level
Materials
f. Mother’s Educational
Level
g. Father’s Occupation
h. Mother’s Occupation
II. Factors in Choosing
the TVL track
III. Preferred Career
Choice

Figure 1.Shows the interplay of variables that correlates of student

preference on TVL Track and Academic Engagement.


7

Statement of the Problem

This study examined the relationship between students’ preference on

TVL track such as the age, course, sex, family’s monthly income, father’s

educational level, mother’s educational level, father’s occupation, mother’s

occupation, the factors in choosing the TVL track, and their preferred career

choice of the first year students undergone TVL track taking up the new revised

curriculum which has three main courses Bachelor of Technology and Livelihood

Education Major in Industrial Arts BTLEd(IA), Home Economics BTLEd(HE) and

BTVTEd- Drafting Technology. Specifically, this study sought to answer the

following questions:

1. What is the profile of the respondents?

A. Age

B. Sex

C. Course

D. Family’s Monthly Income

E. Fathers Educational Level

F. Mothers Educational Level

G. Fathers Occupation

H. Mothers Occupation

2. What is the students-respondents’ preference on TVL track in terms of ;

A. Factors in choosing TVL track

a. Personal Factors

b. Environmental Factors
8

b.1 Parents Encouragement

b.2 Teachers/Classmates/ Friends Encouragement

b.3 Community /Church Encouragement

c. Opportunity Factors

B. Preferred Career Choice

3. What is the students’- respondents academic engagement in terms of :

A. Interest

B. Study Habits

C. Academic Ability

D. Teacher Related Aspect

E. On Instructional Materials

4. Is there a significant relationship between the profile of the respondents

and the academic engagement?

5. Is there a significant relationship between the student’s preference on TVL

track and the academic engagement?

Null Hypotheses:

HO1: There is no significant relationship between the profile of the

respondents and academic engagement.

HO2: There is no significant relationship between the student’s preference

on TVL track and academic engagement.


9

Significance of the Study

This study aimed to determine the academic engagement of first year

college students after graduating in the TVL track. The findings provided

information that will benefit the students, school, parents and the future

researchers.

First Year College Students. In this study it refers being the respondent, this

group of students will be highly benefited for this will serve as a reference in

distinguishing their academic engagement.

School Administrator. The school administrator can benefit from this study for it

will provide insights and information about relationship between the students

preference on TVL track and the factors affecting their academic engagement.

Parents. The parents will be able to know the interest of their children in

choosing the TVL track and will be able to guide and motivate their children to

perform better in school.

Future Researchers. Shall be given this paper as reference should they decide

to conduct a follow-up study in order to focus on building stronger, more

empirically grounded framework.

Scope and Limitations

The respondent is limited to the first year students taking BTLEd (IA),

BTLEd (HE) and BTVTEd-DT undergone TVL track under the Department of
10

Teacher Technology Education of the College of Education, Mindanao State

University.

This study determined the students’ academic engagement of the first

year college students’. Questionnaires are distributed and answered by them

under the Department of Technology Teacher Education (DTTE) in the College

of Education Department (CED).

Definition of Terms

To facilitate the readers understanding of the contents of this study, the

following terms are either operationally or conceptually defined:

Academic Ability. In this study it refers to the eagerness of the student to

perform activities which are incline to the subject matter being presented.

Academic Engagement. In this study it refers to the indicator that combined the

academic identification and academic participation.

Career Choice. In this study it refers to the process of choosing a career path

which involve choices regarding education and training for a given career.

Instructional Materials. In this study it refers to motivating techniques that

teaching materials or equipment used by the teacher.

Interest. In this study it refers to the amount of the student dislike or like of

particular things.
11

Preference. In this study it refers to the free opportunity to select a desired

career it is also a decision making in a confusing situation. In this study, it refers

to the likehood of the chosen track of the first year college students in their senior

high school.

Students Engagement. In this study it refers to the first year college students

undergone TVL track their motivation to learn with their confidence and ability to

succeed in the course and their emotional feelings, that plays a bigger role in

acquiring the skill and knowledge intended for the students who are engaged in

the process of learning will tend to be more receptive to further learning.

Study Habits. In this study the referral to usual form or action of a person in

studying.

Teacher Related Aspect. In this study it refers to the methods or strategies that

teacher uses in teaching her lesson or the subject matter.

TVL track. In this study it refers to the track in K-12 curriculum that follows the

rules of the Technical Education and Skills Development Authority of TESDA.

This means each student has the chance to explore the main courses of the new

revised curriculum.
12

CHAPTER II

REVIEW OF RELATED LIRERATURE AND STUDIES

This chapter introduces you to the different literature and studies that led

to the understanding of the different variables of this present study.

Related Literature

According to Fizer (2013), College students choose their job fields for

many reasons. The factors that affect this decision include family, passion,

salary, and past experiences. In addition to these factors, race and gender can

also affect what field a student may choose. Some professions have greater

percentages of a certain gender or race. Another thing that plays a big role in a

student’s decision of what field to study is the people or role models in his or her

life. These role models can include a parent, teacher, or a recent employer.

When students are choosing a career, they may not have all the information

about the job they are pursuing.

Career Preference

The last few decades have been marked by great changes in the South

African workforce, not only has there been an influx of Black professionals but

there has also been a notable inflow of women in professional positions and a

few more have occupied managerial roles (Klaveren & Tijens, 2009). Grant

Thornton Business Report revealed that in 2012 South Africa had 28% of women

in top management positions, a percent increase from the previous year’s survey
13

(Grant Thornton, 2013). This positioned South Africa just outside the top 10

countries when it comes to women in top managerial positions, thus illustrating

that South Africa has been making progress albeit limited. Advancement into

managerial roles can only happen through the process of career development.

Career development refers to a change or a series of changes that occur in an

individual’s career (Brown, 2002).

The technical-vocational track

The technical-vocational track is more define in the Philippines and Japan

K-12 curricula. The student needs to earn 30 credit points in the specialization,

and the remaining 50 credit points come from the general education subjects.

Courses in the Philippine model are divided into four strands where the student

can choose from. The said programs, however, may not necessarily be available

in the municipality or barangay (village) they are in and therefore needs to take it

in other towns or village. The absence of the much needed tech-voch facilities

and availability of qualified teachers limit the accessibility of these programs to

many. The number of those choosing the academic track may also be attributed

to the limited offering in the senior high schools throughout the country

(Sarmiento et al., 2016)

Interest

Some students grow up knowing what they want to do in life. These are the

students who will go the extra mile to reach their dream job. However, students

often settle on a different path due to many factors they can’t control. Students
14

will research their chosen career path and explore everything about it. The salary

and benefits of that job do not play a role in this decision. In a research study the

factor “match with interest” rated over job characteristics, major attributes, and

psychological and social benefits in importance when students choose a major

(Beggs et al., 2008).

Study Habits

According to Shaib (2010), college life can be stressful, although it is

undoubtedly one of the most memorable experiences in one’s life. It represents a

critical developmental period for both late adolescents and young adults. Factors

such as romantic relationships, organizations and clubs, and sports activities and

lack of communication with parents (Kamwang, 2003) have been found to have

effects on students’ academic performance. These factors affect academic

performance in terms of time demanded and the psychological state they may

cause. He also stressed that academic performance is an excellent measure of

the transfer of knowledge in modern society. Romantic relationships have the

highest impact, and may be a psychological barrier to an effective learning

process. Excessive sporting activities and involvement in clubs and organizations

may pose a threat, but an insignificant one. Gwacela (2006) investigated the

socioeconomic and food security factors that affect academic performance. It

appears that parents/guardians’ employment has bearing on academic

performance suggests that students need more support to overcome food

security factors. The study also pointed out that lack of prior university

preparation and effective orientation program of the school affect academic


15

performance of 1st year students. Furthermore, transition factors, transfer from

rural to urban, personal problems such as lack of confidence, relationships,

tuition debts, financial issues, and disabilities have significant effect to academic

performance. Study effort, age of student, and a good match between student's

learning style and instructor's teaching style all have positive effect on student's

performance. Poor academic achievement might result from irregular class

attendance, lack of preparation before class, lack of class attention, lack of

revision after class, and lack of class participation (Kamwang, 2003).

Academic Ability

Many students choose their major based on their academic ability (Beggs et

al., 2008). However, some students do not have the ability or the work habits to

succeed in some majors that may require more study than other fields of studies.

These students may find a better fit in a less work intensive major that requires

fewer difficult classes. This affects the career paths of these students. Other

students have the ability to handle majors with greater workloads and 8 choose

the career path that will lead to a job requiring more education. Examples in this

category include veterinarians, doctors, or lawyers. For jobs such as these,

students need more than one degree. On the other hand, some students have

the drive to put in the work in very labor intensive fields but do not have the

intelligence to perform the tasks that are needed for their chosen field (Beggs et

al., 2008). These students often receive help from tutors, special education

teachers, and special exceptions when taking exams and doing homework.

Students are given every opportunity to excel and work in their field. Based on
16

grade point averages, agriculture colleges are receiving students with good high

school GPA’s. Studies show that the average high school GPA of agriculture

students is above 3.0 (Rocca, 2013). Therefore, students who enter agricultural

majors generally have the ability to excel in their selected areas of agriculture.

Learning is the development of new knowledge, skills, or attitudes as

learners interact with information and the environment. Learning takes place at

all times. They learn things while walking down the street, watching TV,

conversing with other people, or just observing what goes on around them.

However, education is concerned primarily with the learning that takes place in

response to our instructional efforts. How educators design and arrange

instruction has a great deal to do not only with what is learned but also with how

the learner uses what is learned (Heinich, 2002). There are studies that indicate

that the deep approach learning is positively related to achievement and several

studies have shown a relationship between approaches to learning and study

success

Educational services are often not tangible and are difficult to measure

because they result in the form of transformation of knowledge, life skills and

behavior modifications of learners. Research on approaches to learning refers

mainly to organized studying or organized effort in studying, which emphasizes

good time management, self-regulation and effort in studying rather than of the

motivation to achieve. There are students who are enthusiastic about learning,

but there are also students who need to be motivated to perform their best. One

of the factors considered is their self-confidence.


17

According to Reid et al., (2007), the amount of time and effort that a learner

can put into achieving goals is also important in learning and has significant

impacts on how students engage in learning. Self-doubts can easily creep in

when learners hit obstacles, experience frustration and judge themselves as

incompetent. Students viewed learning mostly as the transmission of information,

the collection of facts and the practical use of knowledge; whereas teachers’

conceptions emphasized critical thinking, problem solving and independence in

teach (Virtanen et al., 2009).

A study conducted by Mlambo (2011) shows a survey instrument that was

administered to a random sample to generate data on demographics (gender

and age), learning preference, and entry qualifications. The effect of learning

preference, age, gender, and entry qualifications on academic performance

(measured as the final coursework mark obtained) was determined.

Relationships/associations between gender and learning styles, gender and entry

qualifications, age and learning preferences, and age entry qualifications were

analysed using Pearson’s chi-square test. The said study also illustrates that the

investigated factors significantly affected academic performance. This

observation could be a consequence of an impressive performance in the

coursework exams by a large proportion of students resulting in less variation in

the recorded grades and perceptions of the learning environment (Richardson,

2005; Diseth, 2007; Parpala, 2010).

Learning preferences were found to be independent of both the age and

gender of students. It was concluded that more determinants of academic


18

performance need to be investigated. Karemera (2003) found that students'

performance is significantly correlated with satisfaction with academic

environment and service received. He also found that the existence of

professional development programs and internship opportunities are associated

with better academic performance.

Teacher Related Aspect

In the teacher-related aspects, the item ‘teacher has mastery of the

subject matter’ had the greatest mean with a very high impact. The rest of the

indicators were deemed to be of high impact with the indicator ‘teacher is always

late’ having the lowest mean.

(Fredriksen et. al, 2004) conducted a longitudinal study on the effects of

adolescent sleep loss during middle school. The participants’ sleep loss had a

relationship with more depressive symptoms, lower self-esteem, and lower

grades. Being hungry in class came in second in the same subset. This is

supported by previous research conducted by Deloitte and released by Share

Our Strength which shows that, on average, students who eat school breakfast

achieve 17.5% higher scores on standardized math tests, attend 1.5 more days

of school per year. Students who attend class more regularly are 20% more likely

to graduate from high school.

Robert Bjork and fellow PT blogger Nate Kornell have explored some of

the study habits of college students in a 2007 paper in Psychonomic Bulletin &

Review. Research on memory provides a number of important suggestions about


19

the most effective ways to study. One of the most important tips is that students

should study by testing themselves rather than just reading over the material. It is

also important to study over a period of days rather waiting until the last minute to

study. Kornell and Bjork's studies suggest that only about 2/3 of college students

routinely quiz themselves, and a majority of students study only one time for

upcoming exams (Markman 2012). These findings are consistent with this

study’s findings wherein it was discovered that among factors related to study

habits; the indicator ‘I only study when there is a quiz’ came out as the most

impactful.

Another study was conducted in a context similar to the study in Iran by

Zarei (2008). This study intended to examine the effect of frequent testing on

Iranian English student’s performance and classroom attendance. The results

revealed that the more frequently students were exposed to quizzes; the better

their performance appeared to be. Moreover, the results showed that the

administration of frequent quizzes had a positive correlation with classroom

attendance.

Instructional Materials

Instructional Materials while a teacher’s job does not end in managing the

classroom, planning and evaluating, the instructional materials also have a big

part in teaching learning process. Student’s enthusiasm, involvement and

willingness to learning process greatly rely on the material that the teacher used

in the classroom. Instructional materials must serve as a vehicle for improving


20

the quality of learning for every student. The guide questions cited by Corpuz and

Lucido (2008) express the standards to consider in the selection of instructional

materials: Instructional Materials give a true picture of the idea/ subject

presented. Instructional Materials contribute meaningful content to the topic. The

instructional materials help the teacher achieve the instructional objectives. The

instructional materials are appropriate for the age, intelligence, and experience of

the learners. The physical condition of the instructional material is satisfactory.

Instructional materials help to make students better thinker and develop their

critical faculties. The instructional materials worth the time to expense and effort

involved.

Student’s Engagement

Engagement is a student's persistent effort with positive emotion to stay

focused in participating in learning activities designed to achieve the set learning

goals (Skinner & Belmont, 1993;Marks, 2000;Audas & Willms, 2001;Christenson,

et al., 2012). Engagement is a latent construct which has been explained as

consisting of two (Marks, 2000;Willms, 2003), three (Jimerson, et al., 2003) and

four dimensions which are behavior and emotion; behavior, emotion and

cognition; and behavior, emotion, cognition and agency respectively (Christenson

et al., 2012;Fredricks, Blumenfeld, & Paris, 2004;Reeve, 2013;Reeve & Tseng,

2011;Skinner, Kindermann, Connell, & Wellborn, 2009).

Student engagement in classroom activities is a complex

matter. Engagement can be defined as behavioral, emotional or cognitive


21

(Marchand, 2014). Behavioral engagement occurs as students show effort and

persistence during an activity; emotional engagement is seen when a student

finds an activity interesting, or they feel positive and happy while performing the

activity; cognitive engagement encompasses student involvement and their

active use of learning strategies that promote deep understanding (2014). If all

three types of engagement are present then student learning is maximized and

classroom engagement is achieved. Numerous research studies have been

done to prove that students who are behaviourally, emotionally, and cognitively

engaged tend to have higher grades (2014) student engagement is an important

element for student success.

Career Path

University of Tennessee at Martin who plans to major in Agriculture says that

choosing the right career path is becoming more and more important for young

students today. Students have to take into account many things when choosing a

career and college major. Many factors can influence a student’s decision,

including parents, coaches, religious figures, or any role models in a student’s

life. Participation in agriculture clubs such as FFA and 4-H can also have an

effect on students’ career choices. The objectives of this research study were to

determine what factors affect agriculture students’ choice of career path. A

questionnaire was developed to examine areas of interest and attributes that

may have influenced students when choosing a career path. The questionnaire

was completed by 128 students in the freshman studies classes of The

University of Tennessee at Martin who plans to major in Agriculture. Chi-square


22

tests were used to examine relationships among study factors. According to this

survey, students are most influenced by family when choosing a major; 22%

chose family as the most important factor influencing their choice of major.

However, 21% of the students chose “a career that is personally rewarding” and

20% chose “FFA/4-H experience” as the most important factors affecting their

choice. FFA played a bigger role in choosing a major than 4-H. Farming

background and the size of schools did not play a role in choosing a major.

However, students with a farming background were more likely to plan on

working in production agriculture than students without a farm background. The

students who completed the questionnaire had a positive outlook on their career.

Students believe their projected careers will make a positive impact on the world.

Students also believe that there are excellent career opportunities in agriculture.

Personal Background

According to Maslow, social aspect is the third need. This comprises need for

belonging, love and affection. Maslow considered these needs to be less

rudimentary than physiological and security needs. Relationships such as

friendships, romantic affections and families help realize this necessity for

camaraderie and acceptance, as involvement in social, community or religious

groups. Socio-economic status is one of the most researched and debated factor

among educational professionals that contribute towards the academic

performance of students.
23

The most prevalent argument is that the socioeconomic status of learners

affects the quality of their academic performance. The social assistance of the

school personnel, members of the families and communities has a crucial role for

the accomplishment of performance goals of students at school (Goddard, 2003).

Farooq, et al., (2011) revealed that socio-economic status and parent’s education

have a significant effect on students’ overall academic achievement as well as

achievement in the subjects of mathematics and English. The high and average

socio-economic levels affect the performance more than the lower level.

Moreover, parents’ education means more than their occupation in relation to

their children’s academic performance at school and it was found that girls

perform better than the male students. On the study conducted by Harb & El-

Shaarawi (2009), there have been many studies that sought to examine factors

affecting students’ performance and most of their findings point out to hard work,

previous schooling, parents’ education, family income and self-motivation as

factors that have significant effect on the students’ grade point average (GPA).

The study further shows that most of the studies focused on students’

performance in the western culture. Their study showed that cultural differences

may play a role in shaping the factors that affect students’ performance, and it is

important to examine those relevant factors to the United Arab Emirates (UAE)

society.

The study of Harb & El-Shaarawi (2009) cited aims to investigate the socio-

economic characteristics of UAEU students in relation to their performance and

taking into account variables pertaining to the UAE society. Using regression
24

analysis, results show that the most important factor that affects students’

performance is their competence in English. It also shows that students who

participate in class discussion and those on leave outperform other students. The

factors that negatively affect students’ performance the most are missing too

many lectures and living in crowded household. Moreover, the results show that

non-national students outperform national students and female students

outperform male counterpart.

Related Studies

According to Chong et al., (2011) the purpose of this article is to analyse,

evaluate and synthesize the concept and development of student engagement in

higher education institutions so that the possibility of application in Malaysian

universities can be realised. The main discussion of this article is organised into

four sections. The first section focuses on the definition of engagement and on

why it is important for higher education institutions. In the second section, the

article describes the antecedent of the concept and its evolution over the last

thirty years. The third section analyses critically the function of student

engagement as a proxy, means or end in research. Finally, the article highlights

the necessity, limitations, and implications of adapting student engagement to the

Malaysian context. Through the overview, it is proven that student engagement is

a concept well developed in theory and practice. Various studies have proven the

effectiveness of student engagement in serving institutional and individual

development. With this understanding of the concept of student engagement,

perhaps it will widen and deepen the perception of administrators, lecturers, and
25

the general public towards the development of higher education. Subsequently,

is may increase undergraduates' level of commitment and meet the challenge of

society.

According to Abubakr, (2017) the study is conceptual in nature and also

the objectives of the study were to assess the relationships between students'

engagement and academic performance. The study examines the extent to

which students' engagement is associated with experimental and traditional

measures of academic performance. The significance of the study is to explore

possible strategies for improving school teachers' motivation. Many measures of

students' engagement were linked positively with such desirable learning

outcomes as critical thinking and grades, although most of the relationships were

weak in strength. Students' performance remains at top priority for educators. It is

meant for making a difference locally, regionally, nationally and globally. It is

suggested that school administrators and teachers plan for a more conducive

atmosphere and meaningful learning activities. Different age groups and genders

among students need to be addressed differently to create a better learning

environment in accordance with their emotional, psychological and cognitive

development. In a developing country such as Nigeria, Students' engagement in

school activities is a major factor in determining students' success in education;

hence, the teachers need to undergo teacher training courses to obtain the

necessary skill to dynamically engage students in classroom activities.

According to Parsons, (2011) the paper that follows reviews research

literature in the area of student engagement the goal in this work is practical,
26

hope to discover in this literature curricular and pedagogical ideas educators

might successfully use to better engage students in learning. Prior to outlining the

specifics of this research, a general overview of what have found as we have

studies the literature to provide a context that might help readers better

understand this area of study. Specifically, the reading suggests that work in the

area of student engagement seems to have grown in a number of ways – the

greatest of which is the change from focusing upon disengaged students (who

are not learning) to engage learners (who are learning). We theorize that older

work about student engagement attempted to reshape ‘renegade’ students back

into the fold of schooling, but current work is more willing to revision schools to fit

the learning needs of students. This change seems crucial and promises to

organize how the study of student engagement will be carried out in the future.

According to (Ivala et al., 2013) Higher education institutions in South

Africa are faced with low throughput rates, and the need to enhance students’

interest in their studies is a key objective for higher education institutions.

Student engagement is one of the factors shown empirically to enhance student

success at higher education institutions. The paper reports on the potential of

digital storytelling in enhancing student engagement with their studies, amongst

29 final year pre-service student teachers at a large University of Technology in

South Africa, as part of their assessment in their final year professional course.

The reason for doing this research was due to the limited adoption of digital

storytelling in conventional educational settings globally and the fact that little

research has been done internationally and particularly in South Africa, into how
27

digital storytelling can be a vehicle for expanding learning. The study was framed

around the engagement construct involving qualitative methods of collecting

data. Focus group interviews were conducted with the students and the

facilitators of the project to elicit whether the production of digital stories led to

student engagement. Focus group interviews were analysed using inductive

strategy. Results showed that the production of digital stories enhanced student

engagement with their studies which led to high levels of reflection on the subject

matter, which as a result led to a deep understanding of the subject matter.

Findings of this study will contribute knowledge in the field which may be

valuable in increasing student engagement with their studies.

According to Kahu, (2017) much has been written about the challenges

faced by first year students at university. This paper adds to that literature by

exploring student interest, known to be associated with persistence and learning.

Using data from a qualitative study following 19 students through their first year

at a regional Australian university, the paper examines the antecedents and

consequences of student interest. Findings show the students’ existing individual

interests and goals interact with the teaching environment to trigger situational

interest. Situational interest then enhances behavioural and cognitive

engagement and leads to better learning and grades. Perceived relevance of the

learning task is shown to be a particularly important determinant of student

interest. Students’ emotions, self-efficacy, and their sense of belonging are also

important factors in explaining the links between student interest, the teaching

environment, and student engagement.


28

Synthesis

When choosing a course there are many factors to consider such as

making a decision which includes the family’s opinion and passion. Furthermore,

one factor that also contributes in student decision making is the people or role

models in his or her life, many factors can influence a student’s decision.

Including parents, coaches, religious figures or any role models in a student’s life.

The technical-vocational track is one of the tracks that can be chosen in senior

high school and it is more defined in the Philippines curricula, the development of

higher education within a selection of countries to the changing needs of the

employment market in both quantitative and qualitative terms, so as to improve

the basis for planning of the development of higher education and to reduce the

mismatch between the type of training offered by the institution and the types of

skills needed for labour market.

In connection with our study from the related literature and related

studies which correlates of students preference on TVL track and their academic

engagement” that concern about the first year students undergone technical

vocational track in their senior years in finding a connection between the factors

that affect their academic engagement, it also discusses the factors that may

affect the students preferences and their level of academic engagement towards

the course that they’ve taken such as the profile of the respondents, their

personal factor, environmental factor, parents encouragement,

teachers/classmate/friends encouragement, community/church agreement and

opportunity factor, and with comparable independent variable in academic


29

engagement in terms of interest, study habits, academic ability, teacher related

aspect and on instructional material.


30

CHAPTER III

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

This chapter presents the research methods, respondents of the study,

research instruments, locale of the study, and statistical tools which were used

for the study on the Correlates of Students Preference on TVL track and

Academic Engagement of BTLEd-IA, BTLEd-HE and BTVTEd- Drafting

Technology students under the department of teacher technology education.

Research Design

The study used descriptive correlational design for gathering data and

facilitates the specific information needed in the study. The purposed of

employing this method is to correlate the profile of the respondents, factors in

choosing the Tvl track and their preferred career choice to the other variable

which is the academic engagement.

The researcher opted to use this kind of research considering the desire of

the researcher to obtain first hand data from the respondents so as to formulate

rational and sound conclusions and recommendation of the study.

Research Respondents

The respondents of this study were the 72 student’s chosen using

purposive sampling, the researcher selected them who graduated in TVL track

and is under the courses of the Department of Technology Teacher by answering

the survey questionnaire enrolled in first semester SY 2018-2019.


31

Locale of the Study

This study conducted at College of Education, Mindanao State University-

Iligan Institute of Technology. There are (4) departments and a total of sixty two

faculty and staff and (1861) students. The College of Education is located at the

Philippine Island in Mindanao, the Province of Lanao del Norte and in the City of

Iligan. Around Iligan City, the College of Education is at Andres Bonifacio

Avenue, Tibanga inside Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of

Technology.

Research Instruments

The researcher used an adapted and modified questionnaire from Career

Preference of Technical Vocational Livelihood Senior High School in Iligan City

by Batausa, et al., (2018) which is composed of (4) parts, Factors Affecting

Mathematics Performance of Laboratory High School Students at Laguna State

Polytechnic University by Balbalosa, (2016) which has (2) parts and Factors to

Consider in the Development of Self-Instructional Materials by Scott, (2000)

which has (1) part. The first part contains the personal background of the

respondents, second part contains the factors in choosing the TVL track third

part is their preferred path after graduation which they will rate extreme likely,

likely, unlikely and extreme unlikely and its effects on students’ academic

engagement which they will rate either strongly agree, agree, disagree, or

strongly disagree.
32

Data Gathering Procedure

The modified questionnaire was submitted to the adviser for comments

and suggestions. After so, it was edited for approval. The researcher then

gathered data through assessment of collective response of the respondents on

the correlates of students’ preference on TVL track and academic engagement in

BTVLEd-IA, BTLEd-HE and BTVTEd- Drafting Technology students,

questionnaires were distributed to the respondents. After giving the letter to the

dean’s office and receive an official approval, researchers asked permission to

the respondents inside the MSU-IIT campus on gathering data from them. After

answering the questions, the researchers gathered the entire questionnaire and

checked them. After each procedure, the researcher went over to their adviser

for statistical tool.

Statistical Treatment

Collected data were tabulated, coded and entered into a data matrix. The

computer software, Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS), was used for

the following statistical tools;

1. Percentage (%)-used to get the percentage of the BTVLEd-IA, BTLEd-HE

and BTVTEd of first year student under the Department of Technology

Teacher Education.

2. Frequency (f) – used to determine how often the answers of the

respondents are in category.


33

3. Spearman rho Correlation – used to assist how well the respondents

relationship between the dependent variable and the independent

variable.

4. Cramér's V – used to determine the correlation of the respondent

relationship between the two variables.

Statistical Analysis

Table 1. Summary of Description in terms of Value of Spearman Rank


Correlation(r_s).

Value Interpretation

0.00 to ± 0.09 Negligible Relationship

0.10 to ± 0.30 Small or Slight Correlation

0.31 to ± 0.50 Medium, Substantial or marked Relationship

0 .51 to ± 1.00 Large, High or very high correlation

All tests were 2-tailed and p<0.05 was considered to be statistically

significant. The statistical calculations were performed using SPSS software.

Table 2. Factors in Choosing TVL Track Likert Scale’s Description

Scale Range Interpretation Description


4 3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
3 2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
Moderately
2 1.75 -2.49 Disagree
Encouraged
1 1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encouraged
34

Table 3. Student’s Academic Engagement Relative to TVL track Likert Scale’s


Description

Scale Range Interpretation Description


Very Positively
4 3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree
Engaged
3 2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
2 1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
Very Negatively
1 1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree
Engaged

Table 4. Student’s Preferred Career Choice Likert Scale’s Description

Scale Range Interpretation Description


4 3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Extremely Likely
3 2.50-3.24 Agree Likely
2 1.75 -2.49 Disagree Unlikely
1 1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Extremely Unlikely
35

CHAPTER IV

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter mainly deals with the data of the study which are collected as

well as generated during the period of investigation. This study aimed to examine

the respondent’s level of preferences on TVL track and its relationship with their

level of academic engagements in terms of their interest, study habits, academic

ability, teacher related aspect and on-instructional materials. The flow of the

presentation, discussion and analysis of data follows the pattern of the study’s

statement of the problem.

1. The profile of the respondents.

A. Age

(28)39%

(43)61% 18 yrs old


19 yrs and above

Figure 2. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Age of the


Respondents.

Figure 2 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

age of the respondents. As depicted in the table above, 60.6% of the

respondents were at least 19 years old and above while only 39.4% of the
36

respondents were 18 years old. This indicates that almost two-thirds of the

respondents were at least 19 years old and above.

According to Leung (2008), each stage has a corresponding vocational

developmental task one has to successfully manage to which is arranged

chronologically according to its age range.

B. Sex

(20)28%

Male
(52)72% Female

Figure 3. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Sex of the


Respondents.

Figure 3 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

sex of the respondents. As depicted in the table above that 71.8% of the

respondents were female, while only 28.2% were male. This indicates that

almost three – quarters of the respondents who took TVL track were dominated

by female. In addition, Mihyeon (2009), points out that men have a more liberal

and progressive style of thinking and women prefer a hierarchal style of thinking.
37

C. Course

(33)23.9%
(33)46.5% BTLEd-IA
BTVTEd-DT

(21)29.6% BTLEd-HE

Figure 4. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to


Course of the Respondents.

Figure 4 presents the frequency and percentage distribution

according to course of the respondents. It clearly shows that 46.5% of the

respondents took BTLEd - IA, 29.6% took BTVTEd, while only 23.9% took

BTLEd - HE. This indicates that almost half of the respondents took BTLEd – IA,

while almost a quarter took BTLEd– HE.

According to Taylor & Parsons, (2011) evidently, there is still a noticeable

gap in the levels of student engagement from school to school and from course

to course. To explain the occurrence of this gap, one can speak of either good or

bad teachers or good and bad students. However, as the practical evidence

indicates, the difference takes place because of different levels of students’

engagement from class to class and from school to school.


38

D. Family’s Monthly Income

(17)24%
(33)46%
P 10,000 below

(21)30% P 10,000- 20,000


P 20,000 and above

Figure 5.Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Parents


Monthly Income of the Respondents.

Figure 5 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

parent’s monthly income of the respondents. It clearly shows that in that 46.5% of

the respondents reported an income at least Php 10,000 below, 29.6% reported

an income between Php 10,000 and Php 20,000, while only 23.9% reported an

income above Php 20,000. This indicates that three-quarters of the respondents

had an income below Php 20,000.00. This implies that most of the respondents

belong to the low class income based on the Philippine Statistics Authority (PSA)

socioeconomic classes.

According to Morrisey, (2013) low family income is associated with poor

academic achievement among children. Higher rates of school absence and

tardiness may be one mechanism through which low family income impacts

children’s academic success.


39

E. Father’s Educational Attainment

Fathers Educational Attainment

(6)9%
Elementary Grad Level
(25)35%
(40)56% High School Grad and High
School Level
TESDA/College Level/College
Graduate/MA/PhD

Figure 6. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Father’s


Educational Attainment of the Respondents.

Figure 6 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

father’s educational attainment of the respondents. As shown in the figure, that

56.3% of the respondents’ fathers were at least TESDA, College Level or

graduate, while 35.2% and 8.5% were at least high school level or graduate and

elementary level or graduate, respectively. This indicates that more than half of

the respondents’ fathers were at least TESDA, College Level or graduate, while

one-third of the respondents’ fathers only attained high school level or graduate

According to Johnson et al., in the study of Boxer et al., (2010), the

parents educational attainment and fathers occupational status were related

positively to their children adulthood occupational status were related positively


40

to their children’s adulthood occupational status. With the involvement of the

parents, the children’s performance and levels of educational attainment are

positively affected.

F. Mother’s Educational Attainment

Mothers Educational Attainement

(7)10%

Elementary Grad Level


(33)46%

High School Grad and High


(31)44%
School Level
TESDA/College Level/College
Graduate/MA/PhD

Figure 7. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Mother’s


Educational Attainment of the Respondents.

Figure 7 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

mother’s educational attainment of the respondents. As shown in the figure, that

46.5% of the respondents’ mothers were at least TESDA, College Level or

graduate, while 43.7% and 9.9% were at least high school level or graduate and

elementary level or graduate, respectively. This indicates that almost half of the

respondents’ mothers were at least TESDA, College Level or graduate, while

almost half of the respondents’ mothers only attained high school level or

graduate.
41

According to Rogers et al., (2009) Fathers’ academic pressure was

predictive of lower achievement, whereas mothers’ encouragement and support

predicted higher achievement. Both parents used more academic pressure with

their sons, whereas using more encouragement and support with their daughters.

The effects of parental involvement were mediated through children’s academic

competence.

G. Father’s Occupation

Medical, Teaching,
Engineering and other
Technical Services Related
Occupation: Doctor, Nurse,
Engineer, Teacher, Technician
& OFW.
(3)4% Business related Occupation:
Accountant, Sales Clerk, and
Businessman, Self-Employed.
(16)23% (25)35%

(7)10% Transportation, Distribution


and Logistics Occupation:
Driver
(20)28%

Government, Public Safety


and Security related
Occupation: Government
Employed, Military, Security
Guard

No Occupation

Figure 8 Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Father’s


Occupation of the Respondents.
42

Figure 8 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

father’s occupation of the respondents. As shown in the figure, that 35.2% of, the

respondents’ father’s occupation was at least related to medical, teaching,

engineering and other technical services such as doctor, nurse, engineer,

teacher, technician and OFW. Data also shows that 28.2% of the respondents’

fathers’ occupation was related to business such as accountant, sales clerk, and

businessman and self-employed. Result also shows that 22.5% of the

occupations were related to government, public safety and security such as

government employed, military and security, while only 9.9% were related to

transportation, distribution and logistics occupation such as driver. This indicates

that majority of the respondents’ fathers had jobs; while only 4.2% reported that

their fathers were unemployed.

According to Wattles (2009) notes that as children move to the

adolescent’s stage they search for career cues by looking to their parents for

career advice or as role models.


43

H. Mother’s Occupation

Housewife

Medical, Teaching, Engineering


and other Technical Services
(10)14% Related Occupation: Doctor,
(2)3% Nurse, Engineer, Teacher,
(29)41% Technician & OFW.
Business related Occupation:
Accountant, Sales Clerk, and
28% Businessman, Self-Employed.

(10)14% Transportation, Distribution and


Logistics Occupation: Driver

Government, Public Safety and


Security related Occupation:
Government Employed, Military,
Security Guard

Figure 9. Frequency and Percentage Distribution According to Mother’s


Occupation of the Respondents.

Figure 9 presents the frequency and percentage distribution according to

mother’s occupation of the respondents. As shown in the figure, that 28.2% of

the respondents’ mother’s occupation was at least related to business such as

accountant, sales clerk, and businessman and self-employed; 14.1% were

related to medical, teaching, engineering and other technical services such as

doctor, nurse, engineer, teacher, technician and OFW and another 14.1% were

related to government, public safety and security such as government employed,

military and security. Result also shows that 40.8% of the respondents’ mothers
44

were housewives. This indicates that more than half of the respondents’ mothers

had jobs and were earning an additional income to their respective family.

According to Pummel et.al (2004) note that many people are third or fourth

generations of their families career heritage. This is because they have an

insider’s glimpse into their parent’s occupation making it better for their

breakthrough into the industry.

2. The respondents’ level of preferences on TVL tracks in terms of;

Table 5. Mean Distribution showing the respondent’s level of preferences


on TVL track in terms of personal factors.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
I have participated in orientations about career 3.22 0.913 Encouraged
choice, and TVL became my interest.
I have definitely made a choice to be in TVL track. 3.21 0.893 Encouraged
I have no career plans at that time. 2.70 1.034 Encouraged
I have done career research on my own and I found 2.66 1.041 Encouraged
TVL as an answer to that.
I have considered applying a job after graduating to 2.32 1.079 Moderately
TVL. Encouraged
I was limited to choosing TVL because of my grades 1.86 1.004 Moderately
Encouraged
Overall 2.66 0.522 Encouraged
Legend:
Range of Mean Interpretation Description
3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Moderately Encouraged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encouraged

Table 5 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s rating on

the level of preferences on TVL track in terms of personal factors. The

respondents’ agree on the statement “I have participated in orientations about

career choice, and TVL became my interest” got the highest mean rating

(M=3.22, SD=0.913) and described as “encouraged”, while their rating on “I was


45

limited to choosing TVL because of my grades” got the lowest mean rating

(M=1.86, SD=1.004) and described as “moderately encouraged”. On the overall

evaluation, most of the respondents’ preferences on TVL track were encouraged

or influenced by their personal choice (M=2.66, SD=0.522).

According to Holland (1959), a person is attracted to a particular career if

it will meet their personal needs and their primary interest type which plays a

major role in career choice and satisfaction.

Table 6. Mean Distribution showing the respondent’s level of preferences


on TVL track in terms of parent’s encouragement.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
My parents were supportive on my decisions upon 3.24 0.869 Encouraged
choosing TVL.
My parents kept me on motivating to pursue TVL. 2.87 0.909 Encouraged
My parents encouraged me to pursue in the TVL track. 2.32 0.953 Moderately
Encouraged
Overall 2.81 0.682 Encouraged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Moderately Encouraged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encouraged

Table 6 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s rating on

the level of preferences on TVL track in terms of parent’s encouragement. The

respondents’ agree on the statement “My parents were supportive on my

decisions upon choosing TVL” got the highest mean rating (M=3.24, SD=0.869)

and described as “encouraged”, while their rating on “My parents encouraged me

to pursue in the TVL track” got the lowest mean rating (M=2.32, SD=0.953) and

described as “moderately encouraged”. Generally, most of the respondents’


46

preferences on TVL track were encouraged or influenced by their parents

(M=2.81, SD=0.682).

According to Sheldon (2009), the parents who have strong academic

support to their children were most likely to succeed.

Table 7. Mean Distribution showing the respondent’s level of preferences


on TVL track in terms of teachers/classmates/friends encouragement.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
My teachers involved me in career-related TVL activities 2.97 0.925 Encouraged
in the classroom.
My teachers we’re talking to me about TVL. 2.84 1.037 Encouraged
My friends motivated me in choosing TVL which is 2.59 0.994 Encouraged
suitable for my skills.
My friends helped me in choosing TVL which is suitable 2.58 0.995 Encouraged
for my skills.
I want to follow where majority of my classmates we’re 2.44 1.024 Moderately
choosing TVL. Encouraged
Overall 2.68 0.745 Encouraged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Moderately Encouraged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encouraged

Table 7 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s rating on

the level of preferences on TVL track in terms of teachers, classmates and

friends’ encouragement. The respondents’ agree on the statement “My teachers

involved me in career-related TVL activities in the classroom” got the highest

mean rating (M=2.97, SD=0.925) and described as “encouraged”, while the

respondents’ rating on “I want to follow where majority of my classmates we’re

choosing TVL” got the lowest mean rating (M=2.44, SD=1.024) and described as

“moderately encouraged”. Relatively, the respondents’ preferences on TVL track


47

were encouraged or influenced by their teachers, classmates and friends

(M=2.68, SD=0.745).

The result was supported by Stipek (2002), if the teacher has confidence

in student’s underlying abilities as well as helping a student figure out how to

reach high levels of understanding and performance will help the students’ to

shape student motivation. Wildman and Torres (2002) found out that there are

many people in student’s life that influence their career decision but a teacher

can also have huge impact on a student’s life as well.

Table 8. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of preferences


on TVL track in terms of community and church encouragement.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
My community organization gave me the impression 2.51 1.026 Encouraged
that TVL can make my life better.
My community organization encouraged me to pursue 2.28 0.944 Moderately
TVL. Encouraged
My church organization motivated me to choose TVL as 2.10 0.943 Moderately
my track. Encouraged
My church organization helped me decide in choosing 2.10 0.864 Moderately
TVL as the appropriate track. Encouraged
Overall 2.25 0.673 Moderately
Encouraged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Moderately Encouraged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encouraged

Table 8 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s rating on

the level of preferences on TVL track in terms of community and church’s

encouragement. The respondents’ agree on the statement “My community

organization gave me the impression that TVL can make my life better” got the
48

highest mean rating (M=2.51, SD=1.026) and described as “encouraged”, while

the respondents assessment on “My church organization helped me decide in

choosing TVL as the appropriate track” got the lowest mean rating (M=2.10,

SD=0.864) and described as “moderately encouraged” only. Relatively, most of

the respondents’ preferences on TVL track were at least moderately encouraged

by the community and church they belong to

(M=2.25, SD=0.673).

According to Fizer (2013), aside from the encouragement children get

from their family and peers and school community also plays a big role in

influencing them with their career choice. As mentioned in the study of Gavo,

(2014) spirituality and religion also have a role in career choice.

Table 9. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of preferences


on TVL track in terms of opportunity factor.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Rating Deviation
The location of the school which offers TVL is accessible 3.14 0.899 Encourage
to my residence.
The TVL track is available in our community. 3.11 0.887 Encourage
There are numerous job opportunities for TVL in our 3.01 0.948 Encourage
community.
I have access to employment in a family business which 2.93 1.004 Encourage
is related to TVL after I graduate.
TVL jobs are in demand in our community. 2.89 1.049 Encourage
Money has been an issue that was why I choose TVL. 2.44 0.890 Moderately
Encourage
Overall 2.92 0.582 Encourage

Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
2.50-3.24 Agree Encourage
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Moderately Encourage
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Not Encourage
49

Table 9 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s rating on

the level of preferences on TVL track in terms of opportunity factor. The

respondents’ agree on the statement “The location of the school which offers

TVL is accessible to my residence” got the highest mean rating (M=3.14,

SD=0.899) and described as “influence”, while, the respondents’ evaluation on

“Money has been an issue that is why I choose TVL” got the lowest mean rating

(M=2.44, SD=0.890) and described as “moderately influence”. Relatively, most of

the respondents’ preferences on TVL track were influence by the opportunity

offered by TVL track (M=2.92, SD=0.582).

This result was supported by Alutu (2002) stated that the environment

may influence the career student decision. The result was also supported by

Thout (1969), that states the income level of a family may determine what career

a student choose during a specific time in student’s life.

Table 10. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of preferences


on the Preferred Career Choice.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
I want to be a teacher. 2.86 1.099 Likely
I want to be a chef. 2.53 1.229 Likely
I want to be an engineer. 2.35 1.148 Unlikely
I want to be a doctor. 2.21 1.133 Unlikely
I want to be a chemist. 2.18 1.099 Unlikely
I want to be a lawyer. 2.00 1.056 Unlikely
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Extreme Likely
2.50-3.24 Agree Likely
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Unlikely
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Extreme Unlikely
50

Table 10 presents the mean distribution showing the respondent’s level of

preferences about their preferred career choice. It can be observed that most of

the respondents’ preferred career choice was “teacher” (M=2.86, SD=1.099).

Thus, this indicates that most of the respondents most likely wanted to be a

teacher and wanted to teach about Technical, Vocational and Livelihood related

works. Furthermore, respondents’ second preferred choice of career was “chef”

(M=2.53, SD=1.229). This indicates that aside from teaching, most of the

respondents wanted to explore the world of cooking as “chef”, which is related to

TVL track.

The result was supported Hamilton, (2000), the students can discover

opportunities that are perfectly matched to his/her interest or skills and help to

expanding the knowledge and skills needed for that career.


51

3. The students’ level of academic engagement in terms of:

Table 11. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of academic


engagement in terms of Interest.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
I am satisfied that I graduated in the TVL track. 3.38 0.921 Very Positively
Engaged
I am disappointed whenever I miss one activity. 3.38 0.663 Very Positively
Engaged
I want to get good grades, on test quizzes, 3.35 0.678 Very Positively
assignments and projects. Engaged
I listen attentively to the lecture of my teacher. 3.32 0.732 Very Positively
Engaged
I actively participate in the discussion, doing 3.31 0.646 Very Positively
activities and/ or clarifying things I did not Engaged
understand.
I am excited in engaging myself in the class that is 3.28 0.881 Very Positively
related to TVL. Engaged
I am curious as to the lesson to be tackled relating 3.25 0.806 Very Positively
to TVL. Engaged
I always make myself prepared for the subject. 3.24 0.726 Positively
Engaged
I get frustrated when the discussion is interrupted or 3.21 0.695 Positively
the teacher is absent. Engaged
I can say that I was right to choose TVL and to 3.17 1.000 Positively
pursue my new course. Engaged
I am feeling enthusiastic about my new course 3.15 0.905 Positively
related about TVL. Engaged
Overall 3.27 0.490 Very Positively
Engaged

Legend:
Range of Mean Interpretation Description
3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Very Positively Engaged
2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Very Negatively Engaged

Table 11 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s level of

academic engagement in terms of interest. The respondents’ strongly agree on

the statement “I am satisfied that I graduated in the TVL track” (M=3.38,

SD=0.663) and “I am disappointed whenever I miss one activity” (M=3.38,


52

SD=0.663) got the highest mean rating and described as “very positively

engaged”. The respondents evaluation on “I am feeling enthusiastic about my

new course related about TVL” got the lowest mean rating (M=3.15, SD=0.905)

and described as “positively engaged”. Relatively, the respondents were very

positively engaged on their interest related to TVL (M=3.27, SD=0.490).

This result was supported and grounded by Bandura (1977); it states that

interest is regulated by self-efficacy and an outcome expectation, which means

people, will form lasting interest in activities when they view themselves as

competent at it and when they anticipate that performing it will produce valued

outcomes.
53

Table 12. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of academic


engagement in terms of study habits.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
I have a specific place of study at home which I 3.28 0.680 Very Positively
keep clean and orderly manner. Engaged
I exert more effort when I do difficult things. 3.25 0.670 Very Positively
Engaged
I do my assignments regularly. 3.24 0.620 Positively
Engaged
I study and prepared for quizzes and tests. 3.22 0.513 Positively
Engaged
I prefer finishing my studying and my 3.22 0.637 Positively
assignments first before watching any television Engaged
program
I see to it that extracurricular activities do not 3.20 0.709 Positively
hamper my studies Engaged
I study the lessons I missed if I was absent from 3.14 0.682 Positively
the class. Engaged
I spend my vacant time in doing assignments or 3.07 0.683 Positively
studying my lessons. Engaged
I study harder to improve my performance when I 3.07 0.762 Positively
get low grades. Engaged
I spend less time with my friends during school 2.90 0.700 Positively
days to concentrate more on my studies. Engaged
Overall 3.16 .351 Positively
Engaged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Very Positively Engaged
2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Very Negatively Engaged

Table 12 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s level of

academic engagement in terms of study habits. The respondents’ agree on the

statement assessment on “I have a specific place of study at home which I keep

clean and orderly manner” got the highest mean rating (M=3.28, SD=0.68) and

described as “very positively engaged”, while the respondents evaluation on “I

spend less time with my friends during school days to concentrate more on my
54

studies” got the lowest mean rating (M=2.90, SD=0.700) and described as

“positively engaged”. Relatively, the respondents were positively engaged in

terms of their study habits related to TVL track (M=3.16, SD=0.351).

The result was supported by Zimmerman (1986), the students who are

high in metacognitive and self-regulatory abilities are thought to be characterized

by active involvement in their own learning process, continuous planning, and

carefully monitoring of the task that they are required to complete, their own

study behaviors, and the match between task and study behavior. Moreover, as

stated by Ley (1998), self-regulated learners seek assistance from peers and

teacher, possess high self-efficacy and effective time management skills and are

goal directed and self-motivated.


55

Table 13. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of academic


engagement in terms of academic ability.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
I think this activity will be useful for the 3.56 0.649 Very Positively
development of my future projects. Engaged
I think that this activity is relevant to the course and 3.53 0.605 Very Positively
to my curriculum. Engaged
I prepare all the materials to be needed for our 3.51 0.531 Very Positively
activity. Engaged
I consider that the development of this activity 3.49 0.63 Very Positively
challenges my ability to perform. Engaged
I always get excited for our laboratory activity. 3.46 0.672 Very Positively
Engaged
I think these activities will help my performance 3.46 0.605 Very Positively
increase. Engaged
I receive help in problems related to the activity. 3.45 0.58 Very Positively
Engaged
I think that this type of activities encourages me to 3.44 0.712 Very Positively
work better. Engaged
I am satisfied with my opportunities to use tools 3.42 0.625 Very Positively
and equipment. Engaged
I can say that my knowledge in TVL increased. 3.41 0.645 Very Positively
Engaged
I have made progress in my ability in this course. 3.32 0.732 Very Positively
Engaged
Overall 3.47 0.473 Very Positively
Engaged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Very Positively Engaged
2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Very Negatively Engaged

Table 13 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s level of

academic engagement in terms of academic activity. The respondents’ strongly

agree on the statement “I think this activity will be useful for the development of

my future projects” got the highest mean rating (M=3.56, SD=0.649) and

described as “very positively engaged”, while the respondents’ evaluation on “I

have made progress in my ability in this course” got the lowest mean rating
56

(M=3.32, SD=0.732) and described as “very positively engaged”. Relatively, the

respondents were very positively engaged in terms of their academic activity

related to TVL track (M=3.47, SD=0.473).

The result was supported by Hackling (2015), it is stated that cognitively

engaged students are those who are completely invested into the process of

learning and those who seek to go even beyond the requirements.

Table 14. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of academic


engagement in terms of teacher-related aspect.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
Guides the student in performing the activity. 3.56 0.527 Very Positively
Engaged
Gives examples and ideas. 3.55 0.555 Very Positively
Engaged
Explains the objectives of the lesson clearly at the 3.52 0.531 Very Positively
start of each period. Engaged
Activities planned to augment information on TVL. 3.52 0.557 Very Positively
Engaged
Is updated with present trends, relevant to the 3.49 0.606 Very Positively
subject matter. Engaged
Demonstrate first the activity. 3.49 0.606 Very Positively
Engaged
Is organized in exercises design to reinforce 3.45 0.604 Very Positively
content. Engaged
Gives and explain rubric in evaluating the activity. 3.45 0.604 Very Positively
Engaged
Uses various strategies, teaching aids/devices 3.44 0.603 Very Positively
techniques in presenting the lessons. Engaged
Is organized in presenting subject matters by 3.38 0.663 Very Positively
systematically following course outline. Engaged
Has mastery of the subject matter. 3.35 0.699 Very Positively
Engaged
Overall 3.47 0.449 Very Positively
Engaged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Very Positively Engaged
2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Very Negatively Engaged
57

Table 14 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s level of

academic engagement in terms of teacher-related aspect. The respondents’

strongly agree on the statement “Guides the student in performing the activity”

got the highest mean rating (M=3.56, SD=0.527) and described as “very

positively engaged”, while, the respondents’ evaluation on “Has mastery of the

subject matter” got the lowest mean rating (M=3.35, SD=0.699) and described as

“very positively engaged”. Relatively, the respondents were very positively

engaged in terms of their teacher-related aspect (M=3.47, SD=0.449).

The result was supported by Downey (2008), stated that teachers need to

know how their daily work in classrooms can be infused with interactions and

instructional strategies that research has shown can make a positive difference in

the lives of students who are at risk of academic failure.


58

Table 15. Mean Distribution showing the Respondent’s level of academic


engagement in terms of on-instructional materials.

Indicators Mean Std. Description


Deviation
Uses PowerPoint presentation to explain the 3.63 0.514 Very Positively
lesson. Engaged
Uses resourceful tools and equipment for project 3.63 0.541 Very Positively
development. Engaged
Present the tools and equipment needed for the 3.63 0.569 Very Positively
activity. Engaged
Arrangements to obtain materials were made. 3.59 0.575 Very Positively
Engaged
Introduce special equipment/supplies needed. 3.59 0.575 Very Positively
Engaged
Video presentation showing about the lesson. 3.55 0.604 Very Positively
Engaged
Chalks and blackboards in explaining the lesson. 3.32 0.789 Very Positively
Engaged
Overall 3.56 0.475 Very Positively
Engaged
Legend:

Range of Mean Interpretation Description


3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Very Positively Engaged
2.50-3.24 Agree Positively Engaged
1.75 -2.49 Disagree Negatively Engaged
1.00- 1.74 Strongly Disagree Very Negatively Engaged

Table 15 presents the mean distribution according to respondent’s level of

academic engagement in terms of on-instructional materials. The respondents’ is

strongly agree on the statement “Uses PowerPoint presentation to explain the

lesson” (M=3.63, SD=0.514); “Uses resourceful tools and equipment for project

development” (M=3.63, SD=0.541) and “Present the tools and equipment needed

for the activity” (M=3.63, SD=0.569) got the highest mean rating and described

as “highly influence”. However, the respondents’ evaluation on “Chalks and

blackboards in explaining the lesson” (M=3.32, SD=0.789) got the lowest mean

rating and described as “highly influence”. Relatively, the respondents were

highly influence in terms of on-instructional materials (M=3.56, SD=0.475). The


59

result was supported by Corpuz and Lucido (2008) express the standards to

consider in the selection of instructional materials: Instructional Materials give a

true picture of the idea/ subject presented. Instructional Materials contribute

meaningful content to the topic. The instructional materials help the teacher

achieve the instructional objectives. The instructional materials are appropriate

for the age, intelligence, and experience of the learners. The physical condition of

the instructional material is satisfactory. Instructional materials help to make

students better thinker and develop their critical faculties. The instructional

materials worth the time to expense and effort involved.

Table 16. Correlates of Students Preference on TVL Track and Academic

Engagement

Composite Degrees of Quality General

Mean responses Description Description

Students Level of 2.67 Agree Encouraged Favorable

Preference

Students Level of 3.38 Strongly Agree Very Positively Favorable

academic Engaged

Engagement

3.02 Agree Favourable

Legend:
Description Description General
Range Interpretation ( Level of (Academic Description
Preference) Engagement)
Very Positively Highly
3.25-4.00 Strongly Agree Highly Encouraged
Engaged Favourable
Positively
2.50-3.24 Agree Encouraged
Engaged Favourable
Moderately Negatively
1.75 -2.49 Disagree
Encouraged Engaged Unfavourable
Strongly Very Negatively Highly
1.00- 1.74 Not Encourage
Disagree Engaged Unfavourable
60

Table 16 presents the Correlates of Students Preference on TVL Track

and Academic Engagement. A mean is computed based on the responses in

every statement used to measure their preference of TVL track towards their

academic engagement. Moreover, the table revealed that the respondent’s total

responses in their academic engagement generated a total overall mean of 3.02.

This is according to the scale used in the Interpretation of the Weighted Mean

(refer to Table 3. Student’s Academic Engagement Relative to TVL track Likert

Scale’s Description) .It is therefore, concluded that the respondents have a

favourable view towards their academic engagement.


61

4. Testing the significant relationship between the profile of the


respondents and their level of academic engagement.

Table 17. Results of Spearman Rho Correlation Test for Respondent’s


Assessment on the relationship between the profile of the respondents and
their level of academic engagement.

Academic Engagement Spearman P-value Remarks


Rho
Age Interest 0.015 ±0.903 Not Significant
Study Habits 0.018 ±0.884 Not Significant
Academic Ability -0.131 ±0.275 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -0.156 ±0.195 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials -0.116 ±0.335 Not Significant
Parents’ Interest -0.310 ±0.009 Significant
Monthly Study Habits 0.008 ±0.949 Not Significant
Income Academic Ability -0.073 ±0.543 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -0.018 ±0.881 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.004 ±0.974 Not Significant
Level of Significance ( ) = 0.05
Value Interpretation
0.00 to ± 0.09 Negligible Relationship
0.10 to ± 0.30 Small or Slight Correlation
0.31 to ± 0.50 Medium, Substantial or marked Relationship
0 .51 to ± 1.00 Large, High or very high correlation

Table 17 shows an analysis using Spearman rho correlations in order to

validate the relationship between respondent’s demographic profile and their

level of academic engagement. A two-tailed test of significance revealed that

there was a marked relationship that is significant between the respondent’s

parent’s monthly income and their level of academic engagement in terms of

interest (r = -0.310, p<0.01), indicating that some respondents with low income

tend to have positive level of engagement on their interest related to TVL track or

vice versa. According to Beggs et al., (2008), the salary and benefits of that job

do not play a role in this decision. In a research study the factor “match with

interest” rated over job characteristics, major attributes, and psychological and

social benefits is important when students choose a major.


62

Conversely, results revealed that there was no significant correlation

between age and their level of academic engagement in terms of interest, study

habits, academic ability, teacher-related aspect and on-instructional materials.

This study has failed to prove that respondent’s level of academic engagement is

correlated with age.


63

Table 18.Results of Cramer’s V Correlation Test for Respondent’s


Assessment on the relationship between the profile of the respondents and
their level of academic engagement.

Level of Academic Engagement Cramer’s V P-value Remarks


Sex Interest 0.138 0.715 Not Significant
Study Habits 0.075 ±0.818 Not Significant
Academic Ability 0.129 ±0.554 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.080 ±0.796 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.136 ±0.519 Not Significant
Course Interest 0.227 ±0.290 Not Significant
Study Habits 0.092 ±0.880 Not Significant
Academic Ability 0.152 ±0.512 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.158 ±0.471 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.273 ±0.032 Significant
Father’s Interest 0.218 ±0.347 Not Significant
Educational Study Habits 0.184 ±0.310 Not Significant
Attainment Academic Ability 0.059 ±0.973 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.115 ±0.759 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.200 ±0.224 Not Significant
Mother’s Interest 0.110 ±0.944 Not Significant
Educational Study Habits 0.096 ±0.861 Not Significant
Attainment Academic Ability 0.153 ±0.506 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.111 ±0.783 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.096 ±0.861 Not Significant
Father’s Interest 0.133 ±0.935 Not Significant
Occupation Study Habits 0.302 ±0.053 Not Significant
Academic Ability 0.224 ±0.339 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.219 ±0.370 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.111 ±0.948 Not Significant
Mother’s Interest 0.258 ±0.290 Not Significant
Occupation Study Habits 0.132 ±0.963 Not Significant
Academic Ability 0.197 ±0.704 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect 0.170 ±0.847 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials 0.139 ±0.949 Not Significant
Level of Significance ( ) = 0.05
Interpretation
Value
Negligible Relationship
0.00 to ± 0.09
Small or Slight Correlation
0.10 to ± 0.30
Medium, Substantial or marked
0.31 to ± 0.50
Relationship
0 .51 to ± 1.00
Large, High or very high correlation

Table 18 shows an analysis using Cramer’s V correlations in order to

validate the relationship between respondent’s demographic profile of the

respondents and their level of academic engagement. A two-tailed test of

significance revealed that there was a substantial correlation significant between


64

the respondent’s course and their level of academic engagement in terms of on-

instructional materials (φc= 0.273, p<0.01). Result shows that the proportion of

respondents from BTLEd-IA, who were very positively engaged was relatively

higher compared to BTVTEd – DT and BTLEd – HE. According to Corpuz and

Lucido (2008) instructional materials express the standards to consider in the

selection of instructional materials: Instructional Materials give a true picture of

the idea/ subject presented. Instructional Materials contribute meaningful content

to the topic. The instructional materials help the teacher achieve the instructional

objectives. The instructional materials are appropriate for the age, intelligence,

and experience of the learners. The physical condition of the instructional

material is satisfactory. Conversely, results revealed that there was no

significant correlation between course and their level of academic engagement in

terms of interest, study habits, academic ability and teacher-related aspect.

However, results also showed that there was no significant relationship

between sex, father’s and mother’s educational attainment; father’s and mother’s

occupation and their level of academic engagement.


65

5. Testing the significant relationship between the student’s


preference on TVL track and their level of academic engagement.

Table 19.Results of Spearman Rho Correlation Test between student’s level


of preference on TVL track and their level of academic engagement.

Level of Preference on TVL Level of Academic R-value P- Remarks


track Engagement value
Personal Factors Interest 0.382 0.01 Significant
Study Habits 263* .027 Significant
Academic Ability .260* .029 Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect .230 .053 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .155 .196 Not Significant
Parents Encouragement Interest .488** .000 Significant
Study Habits .180 .133 Not Significant
Academic Ability .364** .002 Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect .196 .101 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .102 .399 Not Significant
Teachers/Classmate Interest .383** .001 Significant
s/Friends Encouragement Study Habits .136 .258 Not Significant
Academic Ability .203 .090 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect .087 .473 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .112 .354 Not Significant
Community/Church Interest .224 .060 Not Significant
Encouragement Study Habits .067 .580 Not Significant
Academic Ability .025 .838 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect .063 .602 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .154 .199 Not Significant
Opportunity Factor Interest .391** .001 Significant
Study Habits -.010 .934 Not Significant
Academic Ability .301* .011 Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect .162 .176 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .145 .226 Not Significant
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 19 presents the results of spearman rho correlation test between

students’ level of preference on TVL track and their level of academic

engagement related to TVL track.

In terms of personal factors, data shows that personal factors were slightly

related showed significant with interest ( = 0.382, p<0.01); study habits ( =

0.263, p<0.05) and academic ability ( = 0.260, p<0.05). This indicates that
66

those respondents with higher level on preferences on TVL track in terms of

personal factors tend to have higher level of academic engagement on TVL track

relative to interest, study habits and academic activity. According to Sear and

Gordon as cited in the study of Gavo (2014), it is advantageous to a person if he

is aware of his own personality because it increases self-awareness and helps

on choosing his career in life. Also, according to Fizer (2013), personality is an

important factor in choosing a career.

In connection with parent’s encouragement, data shows that parent’s

encouragement was slightly correlated showed significant with interest ( =

0.488, p<0.01) and academic ability ( = 0.364, p<0.01). This result indicates

that those respondents with higher level of preferences on TVL track in terms of

parent’s encouragement tend to have higher level of academic engagement on

TVL track relative to interest and academic activity. Thus, according to Schultheis

as cited in the study of Kumar (2016), parents encourage their children to

analyse first their vocational interest, abilities and chosen career, and

subsequently help them to reflect on career choice.

Concerning with teachers, classmate and friends encouragement, data

shows that their encouragement were slightly correlated showed significant with

interest ( = 0.383, p<0.01), indicating that those respondents with higher level

of preferences on TVL track in terms of teachers, classmate and friends

encouragement tend to have higher level of academic engagement on TVL track

relative to interest. Thus, according to Wildman and Torres (2002), there are

many people in the students’ life that can influence their career decisions. Most
67

of the time friends, parents and friends play a large role, but coaches and

teachers can also have a huge impact on the students’ life. Also according to

Stookey (2004), the advice counselors mostly gave application process and

funding problems, while it is the classroom teachers that gave more academic

advice.

Regarding to opportunity factor, data reveals that opportunity was slightly

related significant to interest ( = 0.391, p<0.01) and academic ability ( =

0.301, p<0.01). This result indicates that those respondents with higher level of

preferences on TVL track in terms of interest and academic activity tend to have

better level of academic engagement on TVL track relative to opportunity factor.

According to Mcglynn, (2007), Students will seek out schools that are well known

for that major or trade most students today are more concerned with the amount

of money they can earn. However, there are a few students who pursue their

dreams. Also this supports to the study of Oyebode (2010), opportunity shapes

the career choice of the students, opportunity may influence how students

perceive their future in terms of reasonable probability of a future in particular

career fields. The issue of poverty has played an important determining role in

the opportunities available to all.

However, this data has failed to show that respondents’ level of

preferences on TVL track in terms of community and church encouragement

were significantly correlated with level of academic engagement relative to

interest, study habits, academic ability, teacher-related aspect and on-

instructional materials.
68

Table 20. Results of Spearman rho Correlation Test between student’s


preferred career choice and their level of academic engagement.

Preferred career Level of Academic R-value P-value Remarks


choice Engagement
I want to be a teacher Interest .003 .977 Not Significant
Study Habits -.061 .614 Not Significant
Academic Ability -.096 .425 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.152 .207 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials -.026 .830 Not Significant
I want to be an Interest .024 .842 Not Significant
engineer Study Habits .000 .999 Not Significant
Academic Ability .048 .690 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.101 .403 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .100 .405 Not Significant
I want to be a doctor Interest -.118 .325 Not Significant
Study Habits .100 .404 Not Significant
Academic Ability -.002 .987 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.106 .377 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .186 .120 Not Significant
I want to be a lawyer Interest -.106 .381 Not Significant
¤ Study Habits .165 .169 Not Significant
Academic Ability .012 .919 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.151 .209 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .044 .715 Not Significant
I want to be a Interest .011 .930 Not Significant
chemist Study Habits .207 .083 Not Significant
Academic Ability .027 .821 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.061 .611 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials .050 .676 Not Significant
I want to be a chef Interest .109 .365 Not Significant
Study Habits .097 .422 Not Significant
Academic Ability .058 .633 Not Significant
Teacher-Related Aspect -.017 .888 Not Significant
On-Instructional Materials -.104 .388 Not Significant
**. Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level (2-tailed).
*. Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level (2-tailed).

Table 20 presents the results of Spearman rho correlation test between

students’ preferred career choice and their level of academic engagement related

to TVL track.

This data has failed to show that respondents’ preferred career choices

were significantly correlated with level of academic engagement relative to

interest, study habits, academic ability, teacher-related aspect and on-


69

instructional materials due to the answer of students on the career that has been

presented in the questionnaire there has no limitation in choosing their future

career. .

Thus according to (Brown, 2002), career development refers to a change

or a series of changes that occur in an individual’s career. Also, however, it

should be noted that not all change is developmental or means progression.

Career development as operationalised in this study refers to systematic and

successive changes in one’s professional life that is indicative of progression

(White, et. al 1992) these changes are marked by the hierarchical climbing of the

proverbial corporate ladder, increased salary, greater freedom to pursue interests

thus further developing one’s career and increased recognition and respect from

one’s peers.
70

CHAPTER V

SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

This chapter deals on the summary, conclusions and recommendations

concerning the results of the study.

Summary of Findings

The salient findings of the study are as follows:

1. The profile of the respondents.

1.1 Age. Majority (60.6%) of the respondents were at least 19 years

old.

1.2 Sex. Majority (71.8%) of the respondents were female.

1.3 Course. A highest in number (46.5%) of the respondents took

BTLEd-IA.

1.4 Parent’s Monthly Income. A highest in number (46.5%) of the

respondents reported an income at least Php 10,000 below.

1.5 Father’s Educational Attainment. Majority (56.3%) of the

respondents’ fathers were at least TESDA, College Level or

graduate.

1.6 Mother’s Educational Attainment. A highest in number (46.5%) of

the respondents’ mothers were at least TESDA, College Level or

graduate.

1.7 Father’s Occupation. A highest in number (35.2%) of the

respondents’ father occupations were at least related to medical,


71

teaching, engineering and other technical services such as doctor,

nurse, engineer, teacher, technician and OFW.

1.8 Mother’s Occupation. A highest in number (28.2%) of

the respondents’ mother occupations was at least related to

business such as accountant, sales clerk, and businessman and

self-employed.

2. The respondents’ level of preferences on TVL tracks

2.1 Personal Factor. The respondents’ preferences on TVL track were

encouraged or influenced by their personal choice (M=2.66).

2.2 Parents Encouragement. The respondents’ preferences on TVL

track were encouraged by their parents (M=2.81).

2.3 Teachers/Classmates/Friends Encouragement. Relatively, the

respondents’ preferences on TVL track were encouraged by their

teachers, classmates and friends (M=2.68).

2.4 Community/Church Encouragement. The respondents’ preferences

on TVL track were at least moderately encouraged by the

community and church they belong (M=2.25).

2.5 Opportunity Factor. The respondents’ preferences on TVL track

were influenced by the opportunity offered in the community

(M=2.92).

2.6 Preferred Career Choice. Aside from teaching, the respondents


72

want to explore the world of cooking as “chef”, which is related to

TVL track(M=2.53).

3. The students’ level of academic engagement

3.1 Interest. The respondents were very positively engaged on their

interest related to TVL (M=3.27).

3.2 Study Habits. The respondents were positively engaged in terms of

their study habits related to TVL track (M=3.16).

3.3 Academic Ability. The respondents were very positively engaged in

terms of their academic activity related to TVL track (M=3.47).

3.4 Teacher Related Aspect. the respondents were very positively

engaged in terms of their teacher-related aspect (M=3.47).

3.5 On Instruction Materials. the respondents were highly influence in

terms of on-instructional materials (M=3.56).

4. Testing the significant relationship between the profile of the respondents and

their level of academic engagement.

4.1 On the profile variables parents monthly income significantly

correlates with academic engagement in terms of interest (r = -

0.310, p<0.01). Course that have significantly correlates with on

instructional materials (φc= 0.273, p<0.01).

5. Testing the significant relationship between the student’s preference on TVL

track and their level of academic engagement.

5.1 On the student’s preference on TVL track, variables such as


73

personal factors (M=2.66) significantly correlates with interest,

study habits and academic ability, environmental factors like

parents encouragement(M=2.81) showed significance in terms

of interest and academic ability, teachers/classmates/friends

encouragement(M=2.68) significantly correlates with interest,

opportunity factors (M=2.92) showed significantly in terms of

interest and academic ability, were found to have significant

relationship with academic engagement of the respondents.

Conclusion

Based on the forgoing findings of the study, the following conclusions are

drawn:

1. The respondent’s levels of preference on TVL track are encouraged.

2. It was found out that the preferred career preference of the

respondents’ is likely to be a chef.

3. The respondent’s academic engagements are positively engaged with

a composite average.

4. Only the parent’s monthly income and course in the profile of the

respondents significantly correlates towards academic engagement.

Thereby the null hypothesis stating that there is no significant

relationship between the profile of the respondents and academic

engagement is partially rejected.

5. In the level of students preference such as personal factors

significantly correlates towards interest, study habits and academic


74

ability, with parent’s encouragement that significantly correlate towards

interest and academic ability, for teachers/classmates/ friends

encouragement showed significance in terms of interest, lastly

opportunity factor that significantly correlates in terms of interest and

academic ability. Thereby the null hypothesis stating that there is no

significant relationship between the profile of the respondents and

academic engagement is partially rejected.

Recommendations

Based on the foregoing findings of the study, the following

recommendations are drawn:

1. Teacher’s instructional materials must be one of the salient factors to

consider and should have a proficiency in teaching major subjects

under the Department of Technology Teacher Education since it

significantly influence academic engagement.

2. Students should seek an advice from their parents or relatives in taking

consideration of their interest, study habits and their academic ability

upon choosing which course to pursue and in return parents should

provide support to their children regarding their courses.

3. It is recommended that the student must take consideration in

choosing a course considering that there are external factors that can

affect their engagement, the researchers recommend that the present

scales used in this research should be expanded and improved.


75

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A. Internet Sources

Abubakr, A. (2017). Students' engagement in relationship to academic


performance.Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323150462_STUDENTS'_ENGA
GEMENT_IN_RELATIONSHIP_TO_ACADEMIC_PERFORMANCE

Alfred-Davidson, T. (2009).High school counselor and career specialists’


perceptions of school practices that involve parents in students’ career
planning. PhD Diss., Dept. of Secondary Education Univ of Florida. United
States, Florida. Date Retrieved. December 2018
http://etd.fcla.edu/UF/UFE0024338/alford_t.pdf

Carini, R.M., Kuh, G.D. & Klein, S.P. (2006) Student engagement and student
learning: Testing the linkages. Research in Higher Education, 47, 1-24.
Date Retrieved: January 9,2019.
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11162-005-8150-9

Chong, (2011) A. Student Engagement: Concepts, Development and Application

in Malaysian Universities. Date Retrieved. December 2018.


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/276459775_Student_Engageme
nt_Concepts_Development_and_Application_in_Malaysian_Universities

Corpus, B.B. & Lucido, P.I. (2012). Educational technology. Date Retrieved:
January 9, 2019.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/272494060_Educational_Techno
logy

Crosnoe, R., Johnson, M. K., & Elder, G. H. (2004). School size and the
interpersonal
side of education: An examination of race/ethnicity and organizational
context. Social Science Quarterly, 85(5), 1259-1274.Date Retrieved.
December 2019. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/j.0038-
4941.2004.00275.x
76

Fredriksen, K., Rhodes, J., Reddy, R. & Way, N. (2004) Sleepless in


Chicago: Tracking the Effects of Adolescent Sleep Loss during the
Middle School Years. Child Development, 75, 84-95.Date Retrieved.
January 2019 http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-
8624.2004.00655.x/abstract.

Gavo, O (2014). strategic factors that influence students’ career choice in kenyan
universities: a study of united states international university. date
Retrieved: January 9,2019.
http://erepo.usiu.ac.ke/bitstream/handle/11732/91/OMARI%20.pdf?seque
nce=1
Hackling, M; Byrne, M; Gower, G & Anderson, K (2015). A pedagogical model
for engaging Aboriginal children with science learning [online]. Teaching
Science, Vol. 61, No. 1, Mar 2015: 27-39. Date retrieved. December 2018.
https://search.informit.com.au/documentSummary;dn=081691076411680;r
es=IELHSS

Ivala E. (2013). Enhancing Student Engagement with Their Studies:

A Digital Storytelling Approach, Date Retrieved. December 2018.


https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/55b2/cda703b9b24875d32408cc9bb39d6
19e72c4.pdf

Kahu E. (2017). Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year

students.

Date Retrieved. December 2018.


file:///C:/Users/Latitude%20E6410/Downloads/504-Article%20Text-731-1-
10-20180626.pdf

Klaveren , V., Tidejens, K.G, Hugie-Williams, M., Martin, N.E (2009). An overview
of women’s work and employment in Azerbaijan. Date Retrieved. January
9,2019.
https://www.google.com/search?q=klaveren+2009&rlz=1C1AVFA_enPH8
14PH817&oq=klaveren+2009&aqs=chrome..69i57.7517j1j7&sourceid=chr
ome&ie=UTF-8
Markman, H., Rhoades, G (2012). Relationship Education Research: Current
Status and Future Directions. Date Retrieved. January 9, 2019.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2011.00247.x
77

Myasnitskaya str (2014) Vygotsky’s Theory: Lessons for Student Engagement


Research. Date Retrieved January 6,2019
https://www.hse.ru/data/2014/06/02/1324961458/Vygotsky%E2%80%99s
%20Theory%20Lessons%20for%20Student%20En..her%20School%20of
%20Economics%20Moscow..pdf

McGrath, S. (2015). Vocational education and training for development. A


policy need of theory. Date Retrieved. October 28, 2015.
http://www.unevsco.org/network/up/EDEV-D-11-00309.pdf
McLeod, S. (2011). Bandura – Social Learning Theory. Date Retrieved.
November 24, 2017.
https://pdfs.semanticsscholar.org/d26d/3d618859d8bc01d64e549f4a45

Patton, W. 2006. Career Development and the systems theory. Date


retrieved. November 1,2018.Https://sensepublishers.com/media/137-
career-development-and-systems-theory.pdf
(2016). Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://www.ukessays.com/essays/education/teachers-behavior-and-
%20students-motivation-for-learning-education-essay.php

Rogers Maria A. (2009). arental Involvement and Children’s School

Achievement. Date Retrieved. Decemeber 2018.


https://www.researchgate.net/publication/238337520_Parental_Involveme
nt_and_Children's_School_Achievement

Sarmiento,D (2016). Senior High School Curriculum in the Philippines, USA, and
Japan. Date Retrieved: January 9, 2019.
http://www.ojs.ssu.edu.ph/index.php/JAR/article/view/54
Super, D (1975) Super’s career development theory. Date
Retrieved.November 10, 2017. http://career.iresearchnet.com/career-
%20development/supers-career-development-theory/

Stipek, D. J. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice.


Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Date Retrieved: January 9, 2019.
https://cepa.stanford.edu/content/motivation-learn-theory-practice-4th-
edition
78

Taylor, L. & Parsons, J. (2011). Improving Student Engagement. Current Issues

in Education, 14(1). Date Retrieved. December 2018.


file:///C:/Users/Latitude%20E6410/Downloads/745-Article%20Text-2766-
1-10-20110506.pdf

Wildman, M., & Torres, R. (2002). Factors Influencing Choice of Major in


Agriculture. NACTA Journal, 46(3), 4-9. Date Retrieved: January 9,2019.
http://www.jstor.org/stable/43766830

B. Online Journals

Beggs, J.M, J.H. Bantham, and S. Taylor. (2008). Distinguishing the factors
influencing college students choice of major. College Student J. 42(2):
381. Date retrieved. (December 2018).https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ816903
Brown, J. W. & Thornton, J. W. (1971). College Teaching: A Systematic
Approach. McGrow. Hill Book Company Inc. Date retrieved. December
2018). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED040696.pdf

Brown, D. (4th Ed.). (2002). Career choice and development. USA: Date

retrieved. (December 2018).


https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/bdm.3960070307

Chadya as, Basilia P. (2008) Factors Affecting Academic Performance of the


Intermediate Grade Pupils in Filipino at Easter College, Baguio City,Date
Retrieve December 2018.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/319630837_Factors_affecting_th
e_academic_performance_of_student_nurses_A_cross-sectional_study
Christenson & L, Sandra & , Reschly & L, Amy & , WYLIE & , CATHY &
Widiasani, Azkananda. (2012). Handbook of Student Engagement. Date
Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781461420170
79

Corpuz, B., & Lucido, P. (2008). Educational technology 1. Quezon City:

Lorimar Publishing, Inc. Date Retrieved. December 2018.

https://www.scoop.it/t/book-by-andre-noel-
barreda/p/4097329196/2018/05/01/educational-technology-1-by-brenda-
corpuz-and-paz-lucido-pdf-download

Danilo H. Sarmiento et. Al.2016 Senior High School Curriculum in the


Philippines, USA, and Japan. Date Retrieved. December 2018.
http://www.academia.edu/35094462/Senior_High_School_Curriculum_in_t
he_Philippines_USA_and_Japan
Diseth, A. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of
academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143-155.
Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/7938/97557767e44eed7a29b50e87883b
25ba29a3.pdf
Diseth, A. (2007). Approaches to learning, course experience and examination
grade among undergraduate psychology students:
Testing of mediator effects and construct validity. Studies in Higher
Education, 32, 373-388 Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03075070701346949
Farooq, Muhammad & Chaudhry, A.H. & Shafiq, M & Berhanu, Girma. (2011).
Factors affecting students' quality of academic performance: A case of
secondary school level. Journal of Quality and Technology Management.
7. 01-14. Date Retrieved: January 9, 2019.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/284150574_Factors_affecting_st
udents'_quality_of_academic_performance_A_case_of_secondary_school
_level
Fizer D.(2013). Factors affecting career choices of college students enrolled in
agriculture. Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://www.utm.edu/departments/msanr/_pdfs/Fizer_Research_Project_F
inal.pdf
80

Fizer, D. (2013). Factors affecting career choices of college students enrolled in


agriculture. Research paper presented for Master of Science in
Agriculture. Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www.utm.edu/departments/msanr/_pdfs/Fizer_Research_Project_F
inal.pdf

Gablinske P.B. (2014). A case study of student and teacher relationships and
the effect on student learning Open Access Dissertations. Paper 266.
Date Retrieved. December
9,2018. https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/oa_diss/266/
Gallup, Inc. (2013). U.S. overall: Gallup student poll results. 1-6. Date Retrieved.
December 2018.
http://www.gallup.com/file/education/233681/2017%20GSP%20Scorecard
.pdf?g_source=link_wwwv9&g_campaign=item_233555&g_medium=copy
Gerlach, V. S. & Donald, P. E (1971). Teaching and Media: A Systematic
Approach. New Jersey:
Prentice-Hall Inc. Englewood Cliffs. Binay-an, Lorna M. Academic
Performance of grade III and IV pupils from Multigrade and Monograde
Classes in Kapangan District, (BSU May 2005). Date Retrieved.
December 2018.
https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/9181934?q&versionId=45015111
Grant Thornton, 2013. ACCA & Grant Thornton (2016). The Future of Audit.
pp.4-5. Date Retrieved Nov. 1, 2018
https://www.theindependent.co.zw/wp-
content/uploads/2018/03/LEADING-ACCOUNTING.pdf
Gwacela, M (2006). The Prevalence of Food Insecurity and the Socio-
Economic Factors AffectingStudents’ Access to Food and Academic
Performance: A case study of 1st year students at Pietermaritzburg
Campus, UKZN. Date Retrieved. December
2018. https://researchspace.ukzn.ac.za/bitstream/handle/10413/10586/Gw
acela_Mbalenhle_2013.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
81

Harb, N., El-Shaarawi, A. (2009). Factors affecting student’s performance .


Munich Personal RePec Achieve Paper No. 13621. Date Retrieved.
December 2018. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/13621/
Kanfer, R. (1996). Self-regulatory and other non-ability determinants of skill
acquisition. The psychology of Action, 404-423. Date Retrieved.
December 2018. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a224569.pdf

Kamwang, A. (2003). The Learning Behavior and Leisure of Low Learning


AchievementStudents, Srithana Commercial Technology College
Chiangmai . Master of Education Thesis in Vocational Education
Chiangmai University. Date Retrieved. December
2018.ftp://fs.libarts.psu.ac.th/research/conference/proceedings-
3/4pdf/006.pdf
Lent, R. W, & Brown, S. D. (1996). Social cognitive approach to career
development: An overview. The Carer Development Quarterly. 44(4), 310-
321. Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www120.secure.griffith.edu.au/rch/file/23b1d622-9a4c-aa24-2ebe-
81cdde216b3c/1/Punch_2005_01Thesis.pdf
Mcglynn, A.P. (2007). Achieving the Dream – What is it, and what’s new? The
Hispanic Outlook in Higher Education. 18(4): 44-45. Date Retrieved.
December 2018.
http://education.washington.edu/enews/2011/december/docs/Contrerasfea
\ture_download-issue-48652.pdf
McLeod S.(2016). Bandura - Social learning theory. Date Retrieved.
December 8, 2018. https://www.simplypsychology.org/bandura.html
Mlambo, V. (2011). An analysis of some factors affecting student academic
performance in an introductory biochemistry course at the University of the
University of the West Indies. Caribbean Teaching Scholar , 1(2), 79-92.
Date Retrieved. December 2018.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233776350_An_analysis_of_so
me_factors_affecting_student_academic_performance_in_an_introductory
_biochemistry_course_at_the_University_of_the_West_Indies
82

Rocca, S.J. (2013). Comparison of factors influencing the college choice of


matriculant and non-matriculant students into a college of agriculture.
NACTA J. 57(2): 72-78. Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://www.nactateachers.org/index.php/volume-57-num-2-june-
2013/2068-comparison-of-factors-influencing-the-college-choice-of-
matriculant-and-non-matriculant-students-into-a-college-of-agriculture

Shaib, I. (2010). The effect of Social Factors on Students’ Academic


Performance in Nigerian Tertiary Institutions. Library Philosophy and
Practice (e- journal). Paper 334. Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1342&context=l
ibphilprac
Van Klaveren & Tijens, (2009). Overview of women’s work and employment in
Indonesia. December (2003) - Kea Tijdens & Maarten van Klaveren Date
Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1342&context=l
ibphilprac
Virtanen, V., & Lindblom-Ylanne, S. (2009). University students’ and teachers’
conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional
Science , 38, 335-370. Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
https://ansatt.uis.no/getfile.php/13456318/SV/perceptions%20of%20learni
ng.pdf
White, B., Cox,C. & Cooper, C. (1992).Women’s Career Development: A study
of high flyers. Cambridge: Blackwell Business. Date Retrieved. December
8, 2018.
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/239781749_Married_professiona
l_women's_career_exit_Integrating_identity_and_social_networks
Wolfson, A. R. (2002). Bridging the gap between research band practices:
What will adolescents’ sleep – wake patterns look like in the 21st century.
In M. A. Carksadon (Ed.), Adolescent sleeps patterns: Biological, social,
and psychological influences (pp. 198 – 219). New York: Cambridge
University Press. Date Retrieved. December 8, 2018.
http://assets.cambridge.org/97805216/42910/frontmatter/9780521642910
_frontmatter.pdf
83

Zarei, Abbas. (2015). On the Effectiveness of Quizzes on L2 Idioms Learning.


Iranian Journal of Language Testing. 5. Dater Retrieved: January 9, 2019.
http://www.ikiu.ac.ir/public-files/profiles/items/090ad_1432035626.pdfh

C. Unpublished Thesis

Batausa, Ronalyn Mae N. et al., (2018). Career Preference of Technical


Vocational Livelihood Senior High School Students In Iligan City.
Lascuña, Lucelyn D. et al., (2005). Adequacy of Instructional Materials in
the Intermediate Grades of Iligan City Central school. Unpublished
Undergraduate Thesis. MSU-IIT.
84

APPENDICES
85
Appendix A

Mindanao State University


ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION

December 04, 2018

JOSEFINA M. TABUDLONG, Ph.D.


Dean
College of Education

Dear Ma’am Tabudlong,

Greetings!

We, the undersigned are students of the Department of Technology Teacher Education, taking up
Bachelor of Science in Technology Teacher Education Major in Industrial Technology (BSTTE-
IT). We are conducting a survey as an input on our undergraduate thesis titled “Correlates of
Students Preference on TVL track and Academic Engagement” as a requirement for the
completion of the course.

In this connection, we are humbly asking your permission to administer survey-questionnaire


among the first-year college students undergone TVL track in the department of technology
teacher education. Rest assured that the information will be treated with the utmost confidentiality
and for the purpose of the study only.

We are looking forward that our request would merit your response. Thank you and more power.

Respectfully yours,

JECHEL A. COSTADA
HALNAISA M. PANTARAN
KATE JASHMINE Q. LAMBINO
PRINCESS ISSATHEA L. MANCERAS
Researchers

Noted by:
REY A. ETOM, MAIE
Thesis Adviser

OSUARDO A. PABATANG JR., MAIE


Chairman, DTTE
Appendix B 86

Mindanao State University


ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION

________________________

Dear Respondents:

Greetings!

We, the undersigned are students of the Department of Technology Teacher Education,
taking up Bachelor of Science in Technology Teacher Education Major in Industrial
Technology (BSTTE-IT). We are conducting a survey as in input on our undergraduate
thesis titled “Correlates of Students Preference on TVL track and Academic
Engagement “among first year students undergone TVL track.

In connection with this, we are requesting for your kind and cooperation in responding to
the survey questionnaire which will be needed in the completion of our undergraduate
thesis. Rest assured that the information will be treated with utmost confidentiality and
for the purpose of the study only.

Thank you and more power.

Respectfully yours,

JECHEL A. COSTADA
HALNAISA M. PANTARAN
KATE JASHMINE Q. LAMBINO
PRINCESS ISSATHEA L. MANCERAS
Researchers

Noted by:

REY A. ETOM, MAIE


Thesis Adviser

Noted by:
REY A ETOM, MAIE
Thesis Adviser
Appendix C 87

LETTER TO THE PANELIST

Mindanao State University– Iligan Institute of Technology


COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION
Iligan City

December 27, 2018

PROF. OSUARDO A. PABATANG JR.


Chairperson, DTTE

Sir:

We are pleased to inform you that our group has completed our thesis research entitled
“Correlates of Students Preference on TVL track and Academic Engagement”.

In connection with this, may we request that the final defense of our research be
scheduled on December 27, 2018, @10 am at CED room 211.

The following professors are respectfully requested to compose the panel.

Panel Members: Signature


1. Osuardo A. Pabatang Jr. _____________________

2. Kayce Mae Michelle Dapanas ______________________

Very respectfully yours,


Jechel A. Costada

Princess Issathea L. Manceras

Halnaisa M. Pantaran

Kate Jashmine Q. Lambino

Noted by:

REY A ETOM, MAIE


Thesis Adviser
Appendix D 88

LETTER OF PERMISSION FOR FINAL DEFENSE

Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology


COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION
Iligan City

December 27, 2018

To the Panel Members:

Ma’am/Sir:

We are pleased to inform you that our group has completed our thesis research entitled
“Correlates of Students Preference on TVL track and Academic Engagement”.

In connection with this, may we request that the final defense of our research be
scheduled on December 27, 2018, @10 am at CED room 211.

The following professors are respectfully requested to compose the panel.

Panel Members: Signature


1. Osuardo A. Pabatang Jr. _______________________

2. Kayce Mae Michelle Dapanas _______________________

Very respectfully yours,


Jechel A. Costada

Princess Issathea L. Manceras

Halnaisa M. Pantaran

Kate Jashmine Q. Lambino


89
Appendix E

A Research Survey Questionnaire on Correlates of Students Preference on TVL


track and Academic Engagement
Direction: Please answer the following questions by checking the parenthesis (), as
appropriate.

I. Personal Background
Name (optional): ____________________________ Course: _________________
Age: ____________
Sex: ( ) Male ( ) Female
Parent’s Monthly Gross Family Income:
( ) 10,000 and below
( ) 10,001 to 20,000
( ) 20,001 to 30,000
( ) 30,001 to 40,000
( ) 40,001 to 50,000
( ) 50,001 to 70,000
( ) 70,001 to 100,000
( ) 100,001 and above
Parents Educational Attainment:
Father Mother
( ) Doctoral Degree ( ) Doctoral Degree
( ) Master’s Degree ( ) Master’s Degree
( ) Bachelor’s Degree ( ) Bachelor’s Degree
( ) College Level ( ) College Level
( ) TESDA Graduate ( ) TESDA Graduate
( ) High School Graduate ( ) High School Graduate
( ) High School Level ( ) High School Level
( ) Elementary Graduate ( ) Elementary Graduate
( ) Elementary Level ( ) Elementary Level
( ) Other (Please Specify):______ ( ) Other (Please Specify):______
Parents Occupation:
Father Mother
( ) Government Employed ( ) Accountant ( ) Government Employed ( ) Accountant
( ) Self- Employed ( ) Engineer ( ) Self- Employed ( ) Engineer
( ) Businessman ( ) Technician ( ) Businessman ( ) Technician
( ) Military ( ) Driver ( ) Military ( ) Driver
( ) Teacher ( ) Nurse ( ) Teacher ( ) Nurse
( ) Sales Clerk ( ) Doctor ( ) Sales Clerk ( ) Doctor
( ) Security Guard ( ) OFW ( ) Security Guard ( ) OFW

( ) Others (Please Specify): __________ ( ) Others (Please Specify): __________


II. Factors in choosing TVL track
Direction: The table shows the preference factors upon choosing TVL track. Put a (/) in the box
which correspond your answer. Use the scale below
90

Strongly Agree- 4 Agree- 3 Disagree-2 Strongly Disagree-1

PERSONAL FACTORS
4 3 2 1

1. I have participated in orientations about career choice, and TVL


became my interest.
2. I have definitely made a choice to be in TVL track.
3. I have no career plans at that time.
4. I was limited to choosing TVL because of my grades
5. I have done career research on my own and I found TVL as an
answer to that.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS 4 3 2 1

Parents Encouragement
1. My parents encouraged me to pursue in the TVL track.
2. My parents were supportive on my decisions upon choosing TVL.
3. My parents kept me on motivating to pursue TVL.
Teachers/Classmates/Friends Encouragement
1. My teachers we’re talking to me about TVL.
2. My teachers involved me in career-related TVL activities in the
classroom.
3. My friends motivated me in choosing TVL which is suitable for my
skills.
4. My friends helped me in choosing TVL which is suitable for my
skills.
5. I want to follow where majority of my classmates we’re choosing
TVL.
Community/Church Encouragement
1. My community organization gave me the impression that TVL can
make my life better.
2. My community organization encouraged me to pursue TVL.
3. My church organization motivated me to choose TVL as my track.
4. My church organization helped me decide in choosing TVL as the
appropriate track.
Opportunity Factor 4 3 2 1

1. Money has been an issue that was why I choose TVL.


2. There are numerous job opportunities for TVL in our community.
3. TVL jobs are in demand in our community.
4. I have access to employment in a family business which is related
to TVL after I graduate.
5. The location of the school which offers TVL is accessible to my
residence.
6. The TVL track is available in our community.
91

III. Prefer Career Choice


Direction: The table shows the career choices after graduating. Please read and indicate how the
statements affect your engagement to learn. Please read and check (/) in the box which
correspond your answer. Use the scale below
Extreme Likely- 4 Likely- 3 Unlikely- 2 Extreme Unlikely- 1
Career Choice 4 3 2 1

1. I want to be a teacher.
2. I want to be an engineer.
3. I want to be a doctor.
4. I want to be a lawyer.
5. I want to be a chemist.
6. I want to be a chef.
Others (specify):______________
IV. Students’ Academic Engagement
Direction: Please read and indicate how your preference in TVL affects your engagement. Please read
and check (/) in the box which correspond your answer. Use the scale below
Strongly Agree- 4 Agree- 3 Disagree-2 Strongly Disagree-1

Interest 4 3 2 1

1. I can say that I was right to choose TVL and to pursue my new
course.
2. I am satisfied that I graduated in the TVL track.
3. I am excited in engaging myself in the class that is related to TVL.
4. I am feeling enthusiastic about my new course related about TVL.
5. I am curious as to the lesson to be tackled relating to TVL.
6. I am disappointed whenever I miss one activity.
7. I listen attentively to the lecture of my teacher.
8. I always make myself prepared for the subject.
9. I actively participate in the discussion, doing activities and/ or
clarifying things I did not understand.
10. I want to get good grades, on test quizzes, assignments and
projects.
11. I get frustrated when the discussion is interrupted or the teacher is
absent.

Study Habits 4 3 2 1

1. I do my assignments regularly.
2. I exert more effort when I do difficult things.
3. I spend my vacant time in doing assignments or studying my
lessons.
4. I study the lessons I missed if I was absent from the class.
5. I study and prepared for quizzes and tests.
92

6. I study harder to improve my performance when I get low grades.


7. I spend less time with my friends during school days to concentrate
more on my studies
8. I prefer finishing my studying and my assignments first before
watching any television program
9. I see to it that extracurricular activities do not hamper my studies
10. I have a specific place of study at home which I keep clean and
orderly manner

Academic Ability 4 3 2 1

1. I always get excited for our laboratory activity.


2. I prepare all the materials to be needed for our activity.
3. I am satisfied with my opportunities to use tools and equipment.
4. I receive help in problems related to the activity.
5. I think this activity will be useful for the development of my future
projects.
6. I consider that the development of this activity challenges my
ability to perform.
7. I think that this activity is relevant to the course and to my
curriculum.
8. I think these activities will help my performance increase.
9. I think that this type of activities encourages me to work better.
10. I can say that my knowledge in TVL increased.
11. I have made progress in my ability in this course.

Teacher Related Aspect 4 3 2 1

1. Has mastery of the subject matter.


2. Explains the objectives of the lesson clearly at the start of each
period.
3. Is organized in presenting subject matters by systematically
following course outline.
4. Is organized in exercises design to reinforce content.
5. Is updated with present trends, relevant to the subject matter.
6. Gives and explain rubric in evaluating the activity.
7. Demonstrate first the activity.
8. Gives examples and ideas.
9. Guides the student in performing the activity.
10. Uses various strategies, teaching aids/devices techniques in
presenting the lessons.
11. Activities planned to augment information on TVL.

On Instructional Materials 4 3 2 1

1. Chalks and blackboards in explaining the lesson.


93

2. Uses PowerPoint presentation to explain the lesson.


3. Video presentation showing about the lesson.
4. Uses resourceful tools and equipment for project development.
5. Arrangements to obtain materials were made.
6. Introduce special equipment/supplies needed.
7. Present the tools and equipment needed for the activity.
Thank you for answering this survey.
94
Appendix F

Mindanao State University


ILIGAN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION

CERTIFICATION
This is to certify that the thesis of JECHEL A. COSTADA, PRINCESS
ISSATHEA L. MANCERAS, HALNAISA M. PANTARAN, KATE JASHMINE Q.
LAMBINO entitled, Correlates of Students preference on TVL track and their
Academic Engagement have been edited in form and content by the
undersigned.

____________________
Editor

___________________
Date

Noted by:

REY A ETOM, MAIE


Thesis Adviser
Appendix G 95

APPROVAL FOR BINDING

Mindanao State University – Iligan Institute of Technology


COLLEGE OF EDUCATION
DEPARTMENT OF TECHNOLOGY TEACHER EDUCATION
Iligan City

December __, 2018

To the Panel Members:

We are pleased to inform you that we, Jechel A. Costada, Princess Issathea L.
Manceras, Halnaisa M. Pantaran,Kate Jashmine Q. Lambino, students of Bachelor of
Science Technology Teacher Education Major in Industrial Technology have edited and
polished our research study entitled “Correlates of Students Preference on TVL track
and Academic Engagement”.

In connection, we are requesting for the approval for binding of our thesis. Hoping for
your approval. Thank you and God bless.

The following professors are respectfully requested for approval.

Panel Members: Signature


1. Osuardo A. Pabatang Jr. ______________________

2. Kayce Mae Michelle Dapanas _______________________

Very respectfully yours,


Jechel A. Costada

Princess Issathea L. Manceras

Halnaisa M. Pantaran

Kate Jashmine Q. Lambino

Recommending Approval:

REY A. ETOM, MAIE


Thesis Adviser
Appendix H 96

CURRICULUM VITAE

I. Personal Data

Name : Costada, Jechel A.


Birthdate : August 16, 1999
Birthplace : Lugait
Home Address : Masilakon 2, Brgy.
Poblacion, Lugait
Age : 19
Sex : Female
Religion : Roman Catholic
Civil Status : Single
Father : Jonard F. Costada
Mother : Michelle A. Costada
II. Educational Attainment

Elementary : Lugait Central School, Lugait,


Secondary : Sacred Heart High School, Acmac Iligan
City
College : Mindanao State University- Iligan
Institute of Technology
Course : Bachelor of Science in Technology
Teacher Education
Major : Industrial Technology
97

III. Personal Data

Name : Princess Issathea L. Manceras


Birthdate : May 3, 1999
Birthplace : Iligan City
Home Address : Suarez, Iligan City
Age : 19
Sex : Female
Religion : Roman Catholic
Civil Status : Single
Father : Celio M. Manceras
Mother : Cynthia L. Manceras

IV. Educational Attainment

Elementary : Suarez Central School, Iligan


City
Secondary : Suarez National High School,
Iligan City
College : Mindanao State University- Iligan
Institute of Technology
Course : Bachelor of Science in Technology
Teacher Education
Major : Industrial Technology
98

V. Personal Data

Name : Lambino, Kate Jashmine Q.


Birthdate : January 12, 1999
Birthplace : Iligan City
Home Address : Purok 3, Saray Iligan City
Lanao Del Norte
Age : 19
Sex : Female
Religion : Roman Catholic
Civil Status : Single
Father : Giovanni Lambino
Mother : Sheila Mae Lambino
VI. Educational Attainment

Elementary : St. Therese de Avila


Lanao Del Norte
Secondary : Curpos Christi Parochial School,
of Iligan, Lanao Del Norte
College : Mindanao State University- Iligan
Institute of Technology
Course : Bachelor of Science in Technology
Teacher Education
Major : Industrial Technology
99

VII. Personal Data

Name : Halnaisa M. Pantaran


Birthdate : August 5, 1998
Birthplace : Panduma Sr, Tukuran, ZDS
Home Address : Espina’s Cive, Tibanga,
Iligan City
Age : 20
Sex : Female
Religion : Islam
Civil Status : Single
Father : Satar B. Pantaran Sr.
Mother : Naira M. Pantaran

VIII. Educational Attainment

Elementary : Sultan Ali Dimaporo Memorial


Integrated School
Secondary : Tukuran Technical-Vocaional
High School
College : Mindanao State University- Iligan
Institute of Technology
Course : Bachelor of Science in Technology
Teacher Education
Major : Industrial Technology
100
101

You might also like