No.

Chap Sect # Question Section Name Short Text Question Type Chemical LNG LPG Oil ConditionalHardware Response TyHuman Response Type Process Response TypeROVIQ List

Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the vessel’s statutory certification
up to date, were all certificates and documents carried onboard up to date and was the vessel free of conditions of class or
2.1.1 2 1 1 significant memoranda? Certification Maintenance of Statutory Certification Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Pre-board

Had the vessel been attended by a company Superintendent at approximately six-monthly intervals and were reports available
to demonstrate that a systematic vessel inspection had been completed during each attendance declared through the pre- Superintendent vessel inspection and
2.2.1 2 2 1 inspection questionnaire? Management Oversight report Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None Binary Documentation
Were recent ISM internal audit reports available on board, had corrective action been taken on board to close-out any non-
2.2.2 2 2 2 conformities and had this corrective action been verified by shore management? Management Oversight Internal ISM audit Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation
Was the Master fully conversant with the company’s Safety Management System and had Master’s Reviews of the system
2.2.3 2 2 3 taken place in accordance with the ISM Code and company procedures? Management Oversight Master's Review of the SMS. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation

Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Enhanced Survey File in accordance
with Classification Society rules, and was the vessel free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the Structural concerns and Enhanced Survey
2.3.1 2 3 1 structural condition of the hull or cargo and ballast tank coatings? Structural Assessment File. Core 1 0 0 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Documentation, Main Deck, Pre-board

Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Class Survey File, and was the
vessel free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the structural condition of the hull or hold space and
2.3.2 2 3 2 ballast tank coatings? Structural Assessment Structural concerns and Class Survey File. Core 0 1 1 0 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Documentation, Main Deck, Pre-board

Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company cargo, ballast & void space inspection and reporting procedure
and, were records available to demonstrate that all inspections had been accomplished within the required time frame with
2.3.3 2 3 3 reports completed in accordance with company instructions? Structural Assessment Cargo, ballast & void space inspection Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting leakage of liquids between cargo,
bunker, ballast, void and cofferdam spaces which included inspecting the surface of ballast water prior to discharge, and were Monitoring cargo, ballast & void spaces
2.3.4 2 3 4 records available to show that the necessary checks had been performed? Structural Assessment for leakage and contamination Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

2.3.5 2 3 5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment Programme (CAP)? Structural Assessment Condition Assessment Program (CAP) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation, Pre-board

Were the senior officers familiar with the company procedure for reporting defects to vessel structure, machinery and
equipment to shore-based management through the company defect reporting system and was evidence available to
2.4.1 2 4 1 demonstrate that all defects had been reported accordingly? Defect Management Defect reporting system Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation

Where defects existed to the vessel’s structure, machinery or equipment, had the vessel operator notified class, flag and/or
the authorities in the port of arrival, as appropriate to the circumstances, and had short term certificates, waivers, exemptions
2.4.2 2 4 2 and/or permissions to proceed the voyage been issued where necessary? Defect Management Defect reporting to class, flag etc Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation
Had the company Management of Change procedure been effectively implemented for changes affecting structure, machinery
2.5.1 2 5 1 and equipment governed by Classification Society rules or statutory survey? Management of Change Management of Change Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Documentation

Were the Master, deck officers and engineer officers familiar with the vessel’s Ballast Water Management Plan and were
2.6.1 2 6 1 records available to demonstrate that ballast handling had been conducted in accordance with the plan? Statutory Management Plans Ballast Water Management Plan Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the VOC Management Plan, and had the procedures for minimising VOC emissions
2.6.2 2 6 2 set out in the Plan been implemented and documented as required? Statutory Management Plans VOC Management Plan. Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the contents and requirements of the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan
2.6.3 2 6 3 Plan (SEEMP) and had these been fully implemented? Statutory Management Plans (SEEMP). Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation
Was the relevant content of the SMS manuals easily accessible to all personnel on board in a working language(s) understood Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Engine Control
2.7.1 2 7 1 by them? Safety Management System Availability of SMS content to all crew. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Room, Interview - Rating

Did the SMS identify clear levels of authority and lines of communication between the Master, ship's officers, ratings and the Communication lines with the company Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Interview -
2.7.2 2 7 2 company, and were all onboard personnel familiar with these arrangements as they related to their position? Safety Management System and DPA. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Rating, Interview Senior Officer

Was the OCIMF Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) available through the OCIMF SIRE Programme database
2.8.1 2 8 1 completed accurately to reflect the structure, outfitting, management and certification of the vessel? General Information HVPQ accurately completed. Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None Binary Documentation, Pre-board

Were records of the most recent Port State Control inspection available onboard, and where deficiencies had been recorded
2.8.2 2 8 2 had these been corrected and closed out in accordance with the company procedure for defects or non-conformities? General Information Last Port State Control Inspection. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None None Graduated Documentation, Pre-board

Were the officers and ratings suitably qualified to serve onboard the vessel and did the officer matrix posted on the OCIMF
website accurately reflect the qualifications, experience and English Language capabilities of the officers onboard at the time
3.1.1 3 1 1 of the inspection? Crew Qualification Crew qualifications and matrix verification. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Binary Documentation

Were procedures and instructions contained within the Safety Management System and signs posted around the vessel
available in the designated working language of the vessel or a language(s) understood by the crew and, were the Master,
3.1.2 3 1 2 officers and ratings able to communicate verbally in the designated working language? Crew Qualification Designated working language. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None None Graduated Anywhere

Did the complement of officers and ratings onboard at the time of inspection meet or exceed the requirements of the
Minimum Safe Manning Document and the declared company standard manning for routine operations, and had senior Minimum, standard and enhanced
3.1.3 3 1 3 officers been relieved to ensure continuity of operational knowledge? Crew Qualification manning levels. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None None Binary Documentation, Pre-board

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a static navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and experienced
3.2.1 3 2 1 company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation Static navigational assessment Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Bridge, Documentation

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and
experienced company representative had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection Dynamic navigational assessment by a
3.2.2 3 2 2 questionnaire? Crew Evaluation company representative Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Bridge, Documentation

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified specialist Dynamic navigational assessment by a
3.2.3 3 2 3 contractor had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation specialist contractor Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Bridge, Documentation

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that an unannounced remote navigational assessment, which included
review of VDR & ECDIS data by an independent contractor or specialist company representative, had been completed as Unannounced remote navigational
3.2.4 3 2 4 declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation assessment Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Bridge, Documentation

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive cargo audit by a suitably qualified and experienced Comprehensive cargo audit by a company
3.2.5 3 2 5 company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation representative Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive engineering audit by a suitable qualified and Comprehensive engineering audit by a
3.2.6 3 2 6 experienced company representative had been completed as declared in the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation company representative Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Engine Control Room

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive mooring and anchoring audit by a suitably qualified Comprehensive mooring and anchoring
3.2.7 3 2 7 and experienced company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Crew Evaluation audit by a company representative Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation

Had the vessel operator implemented a Behavioural Competency Assessment Programme onboard and was there evidence
available that assessments were being conducted for navigation, cargo, mooring and engineering operations by approved Behavioural Competency Assessment
3.2.8 3 2 8 assessors? Crew Evaluation Programme Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation
Had the Master and all navigation officers attended a shore-based Bridge Team Management training course within the Shore-based Bridge Team Management
3.3.1 3 3 1 previous five years? Crew Training training Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation
Had the Master received formal ship handling training prior to promotion or when being assigned to a new type of ship having
3.3.2 3 3 2 significantly different handling characteristics to ships in which they had recently served? Crew Training Formal ship handling training Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None None Binary Documentation
Had the Master, deck officers, and cargo/gas engineer where carried, attended a shore-based simulator course covering Cargo operations shore-based simulator
3.3.3 3 3 3 routine and emergency cargo operations within the previous five years? Crew Training course Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation
Had the Chief Engineer and all engineer officers attended a shore-based engine room management simulator course covering Shore-based engine room management
3.3.4 3 3 4 routine and emergency machinery operations within the previous five years? Crew Training simulator course Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation

Did all key personnel onboard involved in Dynamically Positioned (DP) operations have appropriate training in accordance with
IMO and International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) guidelines and local regulations applicable to the area of Training for Dynamically Positioned (DP)
3.3.5 3 3 5 operations? Crew Training operators Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None None Graduated Bridge, Documentation
Had the Master, officers and ratings received the required training and familiarisation before being assigned duties related to LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel training
3.3.6 3 3 6 handling LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel? Crew Training and familiarisation. Rotational 2 1 0 1 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Documentation
Was there an effective system in place to record and monitor the hours of rest for all personnel onboard in compliance with
3.4.1 3 4 1 STCW, MLC or the regulatory requirements applicable to the vessel? Crew Compliance Hours of rest, records and monitoring Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation
Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the company policy and procedures for drug and alcohol abuse prevention
3.4.2 3 4 2 and had unannounced drug and alcohol testing taken place onboard in accordance with the policy? Crew Compliance Drug and alcohol abuse prevention Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation

Had the company developed an effective familiarisation programme that covered the personal safety and professional
responsibilities of all onboard personnel, including visitors and contractors, and were records available to demonstrate that Familiarisation of crew, visitors and
3.5.1 3 5 1 the familiarisation had been completed as required? Crew Familiarisation contractors Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Documentation
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the ship’s lifesaving and fire extinguishing appliances and, had ongoing
3.5.2 3 5 2 onboard training and instruction taken place to maintain familiarity? Crew Familiarisation Training and instruction LSA and FFA Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Documentation
Had the Master and navigation officers been familiarised with the ECDIS equipment installed on board and were documented Familiarisation with ECDIS equipment
3.5.3 3 5 3 records of this familiarisation available? Crew Familiarisation installed on board. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the set up and operation of the ECDIS units
fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that the ECDIS had been operated in accordance with company
4.1.1 4 1 1 procedures at all stages of a voyage? Navigation Equipment ECDIS set up and operation Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for managing and operating the radar/ARPA
units fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that the units had been operated and tested in
4.1.2 4 1 2 accordance with company procedures? Navigation Equipment Operation and testing of radar/ARPA Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and testing the steering control
systems fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that operation and testing had been carried out in Operating and testing the steering control
4.1.3 4 1 3 accordance with the procedures? Navigation Equipment systems Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for using the Automatic Identification System
(AIS) fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic checks and tests had been carried out in
4.1.4 4 1 4 accordance with the procedures? Navigation Equipment Automatic Identification System (AIS) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the use of the Bridge Navigational Watch
Alarm System (BNWAS) and were records available to demonstrate that it had been operated and tested in accordance with Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System
4.1.5 4 1 5 the procedure? Navigation Equipment (BNWAS) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures governing the management and operation of
the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers fitted onboard and was the fitted equipment configured, used and
4.1.6 4 1 6 checked in accordance with the procedure? Navigation Equipment Global Navigation Satellite System(s) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and managing the echo sounder
and were records maintained to demonstrate that the equipment fitted to the vessel had been tested and operated in
4.1.7 4 1 7 accordance with the company expectations? Navigation Equipment Echo sounder Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation and testing of the speed and
distance measuring devices fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests had been
4.1.8 4 1 8 completed as required by the procedures? Navigation Equipment Speed and distance measuring devices Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the navigation lights
and shapes, and was there evidence that the navigation lights had been tested to confirm full functionality and correct
4.1.9 4 1 9 visibility? Navigation Equipment Navigation lights and shapes Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for managing Marine Safety Information
4.1.10 4 1 10 broadcasts by NAVTEX and SafetyNET and were warnings affecting the vessel’s route plotted on the voyage charts? Navigation Equipment NAVTEX and SafetyNET Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR and
4.1.11 4 1 11 were records available to demonstrate that tests of the equipment had been completed as required? Navigation Equipment Preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the magnetic and gyro compasses
4.1.12 4 1 12 carried onboard, and were records available to demonstrate their accuracy and reliability? Navigation Equipment Magnetic and gyro compasses Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation and testing of the VHF/DSC
transceivers fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests and checks had been
4.1.13 4 1 13 completed in accordance with company expectations? Navigation Equipment VHF/DSC transceivers Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

4.1.14 4 1 14 Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for testing and using the daylight signalling lamp? Navigation Equipment Daylight signalling lamp Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the sound signalling
equipment fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic tests had been completed and the
4.1.15 4 1 15 equipment used in accordance with company expectations? Navigation Equipment Sound signalling equipment Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigating officers familiar with the company passage planning procedures and had all voyages been
appraised, planned, executed and monitored in accordance with company procedures, industry best practice and both local
4.2.1 4 2 1 and international rules? Navigational Procedures Passage planning Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company under keel clearance (UKC) policy and procedure, and
were records available to demonstrate that the required calculations had been completed at the appropriate points during
4.2.2 4 2 2 each voyage and the vessel had remained in compliance with the UKC policy? Navigational Procedures Under keel clearance (UKC) policy Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge

Had the Master prepared Master's Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforced the
company expectations with regards to navigational requirements including restricted visibility, CPA/BCR and minimum passing
distance from navigational dangers and navigational aids and, if so, had all navigation officers signed to acknowledge their
4.2.3 4 2 3 understanding of the same? Navigational Procedures Master's Standing Orders and Daily Orders Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company electronic chart management procedures and were
4.2.4 4 2 4 onboard ENCs and RNCs managed, corrected and used appropriately? Navigational Procedures Electronic chart management. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company paper chart management procedures and were onboard
4.2.5 4 2 5 paper charts managed, corrected and used appropriately? Navigational Procedures Paper chart management Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the navigational equipment, main
propulsion, steering gear and thrusters prior to use and prior to critical phases of a passage or operation and, did checklists or Testing navigational equipment, main
4.2.6 4 2 6 logbook entries confirm the required tests had been completed as required? Navigational Procedures propulsion, steering gear and thrusters Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the carriage and management of nautical
publications and was evidence available to demonstrate that publications had been managed in accordance with the
4.2.7 4 2 7 procedure? Navigational Procedures Nautical publications Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures defining the minimum bridge team
composition and engine room operating mode and were records available to demonstrate that recent voyages had been Bridge and Machinery Space Team
4.3.1 4 3 1 planned and executed in accordance with company expectations? Management Minimum bridge team composition Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedures defining machinery space operating mode and, where
required to be attended, the machinery space team composition during the various stages of a voyage, and were records Bridge and Machinery Space Team
4.3.2 4 3 2 available to confirm the machinery space had been operated accordingly? Management Machinery space team composition Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Engine Control Room
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for integrating a pilot (or similar role*) into the Bridge and Machinery Space Team Integrating a pilot (or similar role) into the
4.3.3 4 3 3 bridge team and were records available to demonstrate that the process had been followed? Management bridge team Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures to prevent disruption and distraction on the Bridge and Machinery Space Team
4.3.4 4 3 4 bridge, and were these procedures being complied with? Management Bridge distractions. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the operation of the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) and was Communications Equipment and Emergency Position Indicating Radio
4.4.1 4 4 1 the EPIRB in good order with records available to demonstrate that had it been inspected, tested and maintained as required? Procedures Beacon (EPIRB) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the Search and Rescue Transmitters (SARTs), and were the SARTs Communications Equipment and
4.4.2 4 4 2 in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected and tested as required? Procedures Search and Rescue Transmitters (SARTs) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the survival craft portable two-way VHF
radios and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they been inspected and tested as Communications Equipment and
4.4.3 4 4 3 required? Procedures Survival craft portable two-way VHF radios Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the procedures for sending and receiving distress, urgency and safety Communications Equipment and Sending and receiving distress, urgency
4.4.4 4 4 4 messages and were suitable instructions posted by the GMDSS equipment? Procedures and safety messages Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the operation, testing and maintenance of the GMDSS VHF, MF and HF Communications Equipment and
4.4.5 4 4 5 radio and satellite communications equipment and were records available to demonstrate the equipment was in good order? Procedures Operation and testing of GMDSS station. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master, officers and crew aware of the potential danger of using radio or mobile telephone equipment during cargo Use of radio or mobile telephone
and ballast handling operations and was there a sufficient number of intrinsically safe portable radios for use in operational Communications Equipment and equipment during cargo and ballast
4.4.6 4 4 6 areas? Procedures handling Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Was the latest Annual DP Trial report available on board, were the Master and officers familiar with the contents, and had DP & Shuttle Tanker Specialist Annual DP Trial report and supporting
4.5.1 4 5 1 they taken part in onboard training and drills involving various DP scenarios? Procedures and Equipment exercises. Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Engine Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of Position Reference Systems (PRS), and was DP & Shuttle Tanker Specialist
4.5.2 4 5 2 the equipment in satisfactory condition with sensor offset data readily available to the DPO? Procedures and Equipment DP Position Reference Systems Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for reporting and recording DP events and incidents, and DP & Shuttle Tanker Specialist
4.5.3 4 5 3 were all DP parameters being logged and recorded? Procedures and Equipment DP events and incidents Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation

Was the vessel provided with a comprehensive DP operations manual and were the Master and officers familiar with its DP & Shuttle Tanker Specialist
4.5.4 4 5 4 contents, including DP checklists, capability plots, consequence analysis and activity specific operating guidelines (ASOG)? Procedures and Equipment DP operations manual Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Bridge
 Were up to date Field Operations Manuals on board for each offshore terminal to which the vessel trades, were the Master
and officers familiar with their content, and were records available of the regular communication checks with terminal DP & Shuttle Tanker Specialist
4.5.5 4 5 5 installations as required by Field Specific Operating Guidelines (FSOG)? Procedures and Equipment Field Operations Manuals Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and officers familiar with the onboard emergency response plans, and were records available to
demonstrate that all mandatory and company defined emergency drills had been completed and documented as required by Records of mandatory and company
5.1.1 5 1 1 company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills defined emergency drills Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for the principal fire scenarios for the vessel type, Emergency plans & drills for principal fire
5.1.2 5 1 2 and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the plans in accordance with the company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills scenarios Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation
Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s SOPEP or SMPEP, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of Pollution prevention drills required by Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Interview - Deck
5.1.3 5 1 3 the onboard emergency response actions required by the Plan and company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills SOPEP or SMPEP Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Officer

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for enclosed space rescue, and had drills taken place Enclosed space rescue emergency Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Interview - Deck Rating,
5.1.4 5 1 4 to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills response drill. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck
Were the Master and Ship Security Officer (SSO) familiar with the vessel’s Ship Security Plan (SSP), and had drills taken place to Drills required by the Ship Security Plan
5.1.5 5 1 5 test the effectiveness of the measures and procedures specified by the Ship Security Plan? Emergency Response Plans and Drills (SSP) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Security Officer

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the procedure for launching the lifeboat(s), and had abandon ship drills Launching the lifeboat(s) and abandon
5.1.6 5 1 6 taken place in accordance with company procedures and the requirements of SOLAS and the Flag Administration? Emergency Response Plans and Drills ship drills Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation, Interview - Deck Rating, Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for a cargo vapour or liquid release, Including
potential fire, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance Emergency plan & drills for a cargo vapour
5.1.7 5 1 7 with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills or liquid release, Including potential fire Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for collision, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.8 5 1 8 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills Emergency plan & drills for collision Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for grounding, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.9 5 1 9 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills Emergency plan & drills for grounding Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for loss of propulsion, and had drills taken place to Emergency plan & drills for loss of Bridge, Documentation, Engine Control Room, Interview - Deck
5.1.10 5 1 10 test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills propulsion Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Officer, Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for failure of electrical power, and had drills taken Emergency plan & drills for failure of Bridge, Documentation, Engine Control Room, Interview - Deck
5.1.11 5 1 11 place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills electrical power Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Officer, Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for steering gear failure, and had drills taken place
5.1.12 5 1 12 to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures. Emergency Response Plans and Drills Steering gear failure emergency drill. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation, Interview - Deck Officer, Steering Gear

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for emergency towing, including the Emergency
Towing Booklet (ETB), and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in Emergency plan & drills for emergency Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Forecastle, Interview - Deck Officer,
5.1.13 5 1 13 accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills towing Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for man overboard, including the
launching and recovering the rescue boat, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency Bridge, Documentation, Interview - Deck Officer, Interview - Deck
5.1.14 5 1 14 response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills Man overboard emergency drill. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for recovery of persons from the
water, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with Emergency response plan & drills for
5.1.15 5 1 15 company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills recovery of persons from the water Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation, Interview - Rating

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for flooding, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.16 5 1 16 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills Emergency plans & drills for flooding Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans regarding LNG bunker operations, and had drills Emergency plans and drills for LNG bunker
5.1.17 5 1 17 taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures? Emergency Response Plans and Drills operations Rotational 2 1 0 1 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Engine Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures setting out the actions to be taken in the event of a cargo
5.1.18 5 1 18 leak into a double hull tank, and was all required equipment available and in satisfactory condition? Emergency Response Plans and Drills Cargo leak into double hull spaces. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Officer, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the spaces forward of the collision OBO Forward space emergency pumping
5.1.19 5 1 19 bulkhead in the event of flooding and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? Emergency Response Plans and Drills arrangements Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Engine Control Room, Forecastle, Interview - Deck Officer

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency fire pump, and were records
available to demonstrate that the emergency fire pump and its location had been maintained and tested in accordance with
5.2.1 5 2 1 company procedures? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Emergency fire pump Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Aft Mooring Deck, Steering Gear

Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire dampers, the
means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation systems and the means of stopping the power ventilation Aft Mooring Deck, Emergency Headquarters., Exterior Decks,
5.2.2 5 2 2 systems from outside the space served? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Fire dampers & ventilation stops Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Forecastle, Interview - Engineer Officer, Interview - Rating

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed fire detection and fire Bridge, Emergency Headquarters., Engine Control Room,
5.2.3 5 2 3 alarm system, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Fixed fire detection and fire alarm system Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Interview - Electrician / ETO

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed carbon dioxide fire
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with the release Machinery space fixed carbon dioxide fire
5.2.4 5 2 4 procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations? Fixed Fire Protection Systems extinguishing system Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Aft Mooring Deck, Emergency Headquarters.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s machinery space fixed high-
expansion foam fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order, available for immediate use, and Machinery space fixed high-expansion
5.2.5 5 2 5 with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? Fixed Fire Protection Systems foam fire extinguishing system Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Emergency Headquarters., Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s machinery space fixed pressure
water-spraying fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with Machinery space fixed pressure water-
5.2.6 5 2 6 operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? Fixed Fire Protection Systems spraying fire extinguishing system Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Emergency Headquarters., Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire pumps, fire main, fire main
isolating valves and fire hydrants, and was the system and its components in good working order and available for immediate Fire pumps, fire main, fire main isolating
5.2.7 5 2 7 use? Fixed Fire Protection Systems valves and fire hydrants Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Bridge, Emergency Headquarters., Engine Room, Exterior Decks

Were the Master, officers and galley staff familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed and portable fire
extinguishing systems provided in the galley, were the systems in good working order and available for immediate use, and Galley fixed and portable fire extinguishing
5.2.8 5 2 8 were galley ranges, exhaust vents, filter cowls free of grease or combustible material? Fixed Fire Protection Systems systems & fire prevention Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Internal Accommodation, Interview - Galley Rating

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the water-spray system for cooling, fire
prevention and crew protection on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and
5.2.9 5 2 9 maintained? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Water-spray system on deck Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire extinguishing system installed
within enclosed spaces containing cargo handling equipment, and was the equipment in good working order and available for Cargo handling equipment space(s) fixed
5.2.10 5 2 10 immediate use, with the release procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations? Fixed Fire Protection Systems fire extinguishing system Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed dry chemical powder fire
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for immediate use, with operating Fixed dry chemical powder fire
5.2.11 5 2 11 instructions clearly displayed at the control stations. Fixed Fire Protection Systems extinguishing system Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Cargo Manifold, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire-extinguishing system in the
vessel’s paint locker and any other flammable liquid locker, and was the system in good working order and available for
5.2.12 5 2 12 immediate use? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Paint locker fixed fire-extinguishing system Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Exterior Decks

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the machinery space fixed water-based or Machinery space fixed water-based or
equivalent local application fire-fighting system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for equivalent local application fire-fighting
5.2.13 5 2 13 immediate use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? Fixed Fire Protection Systems system Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Emergency Headquarters., Engine Room, Steering Gear

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose of the cargo, ballast and stripping pump temperature sensing devices,
and was there evidence that alarm activation points had been correctly set and tested in accordance with company Cargo, ballast and stripping pump
5.2.14 5 2 14 procedures and manufacturer's instructions? Fixed Fire Protection Systems temperature sensing devices Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Pumproom

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s deck foam system, including
portable applicators, and was the system in good working order and available for immediate use, with operating instructions Deck foam system, including portable Cargo Manifold, Emergency Headquarters., Interview - Rating,
5.2.15 5 2 15 displayed at the control station? Fixed Fire Protection Systems applicators Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck
Engine Room, Forecastle, Internal Accommodation, Interview -
5.2.16 5 2 16 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire doors? Fixed Fire Protection Systems Fire doors Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Deck Officer, Interview - Engine Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and use of the vessel’s firefighter’s outfits including the self-
contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and was the equipment maintained in good condition and ready for immediate use in Firefighter’s outfits including self-
5.3.1 5 3 1 accordance with company procedures? Portable fire fighting appliances contained breathing apparatus (SCBA) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Emergency Headquarters., Forecastle, Steering Gear

Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire hoses, nozzles and Fire hoses, nozzles and international shore
5.3.2 5 3 2 international shore connection, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use? Portable fire fighting appliances connection Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Interview - Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s portable fire
extinguishers, and were the extinguishers in good order and readily available for immediate use with operating instructions
5.3.3 5 3 3 clearly marked? Portable fire fighting appliances Portable fire extinguishers Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Anywhere, Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and purpose of the Emergency Escape Breathing Devices Emergency Escape Breathing Devices Engine Room, Internal Accommodation, Interview - Rating,
5.3.4 5 3 4 (EEBDs) carried on board, and were these devices in good order, suitably located and ready for immediate use? Portable fire fighting appliances (EEBDs) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Pumproom

Were the Master, officers and engine ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s wheeled (mobile) fire
extinguishers, and was the equipment in good order and available for immediate use with operating instructions clearly
5.3.5 5 3 5 marked? Portable fire fighting appliances Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Interview - Engine Rating

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the davit-launched lifeboats, release mechanisms and launching
appliances, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as Davit-launched lifeboats, release
5.4.1 5 4 1 required? Life saving appliances mechanisms and launching appliances Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and its launching
appliance, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition with records available to demonstrate that it had been inspected Free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and
5.4.2 5 4 2 and tested in accordance with company procedures? Life saving appliances its launching appliance Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the dedicated rescue boat and launching appliance, and were they Dedicated rescue boat and launching
5.4.3 5 4 3 in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as required? Life saving appliances appliance Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the rocket parachute flares and line
throwing appliances and were they in good order, with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected as Rocket parachute flares and line throwing
5.4.4 5 4 4 required? Life saving appliances appliances Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the liferafts, hydrostatic releases and liferaft launching appliances,
where provided, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been serviced, inspected Liferafts, hydrostatic releases and liferaft
5.4.5 5 4 5 and tested as required? Life saving appliances launching appliances Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Forecastle, Lifeboat deck
Were the lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke floats and lifelines, in good order, clearly marked and correctly distributed Lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke
5.4.6 5 4 6 around the ship? Life saving appliances floats and lifelines Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Main Deck, Mooring Decks
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the immersion suits, and were the immersion suits in good order, readily
5.4.7 5 4 7 accessible and their location(s) clearly indicated? Life saving appliances Immersion suits Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Forecastle, Lifeboat deck
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the lifejackets and personal flotation devices (PFDs) provided on board, and Lifejackets and personal flotation devices Bridge, Engine Control Room, Forecastle, Interview - Rating,
5.4.8 5 4 8 was the equipment in good condition, and properly maintained? Life saving appliances (PFDs) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Lifeboat deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the periodic testing and maintenance of the Engine Room, Forecastle, Interview - Electrician / ETO, Lifeboat
5.4.9 5 4 9 emergency lighting system, was there evidence of periodic testing, and was the system in proper operating condition? Life saving appliances Emergency lighting. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated deck, Mooring Decks, Pumproom, Steering Gear

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company enclosed space entry procedures, and was evidence available Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Engine Control Room,
5.5.1 5 5 1 to demonstrate that all enclosed space entries had been made in strict compliance with the procedures? Permits to work Enclosed space entry procedures Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Interview - Rating

Were the Master, officers and, where directly involved, ratings familiar with the company hot work procedure, and was Documentation, Engine Room, Interview - Engine Rating, Main
5.5.2 5 5 2 evidence available to demonstrate that hot work had been conducted in accordance with the procedure? Permits to work Hot work procedure Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Deck

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for working at height, and was there evidence that
risk control measures such as permits to work or documented risk assessments were consistently used whenever work was
5.5.3 5 5 3 undertaken at height? Permits to work Working at height Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Exterior Decks, Interview - Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for working over the side, and was there evidence
that risk control measures such as standard work procedures, permits to work or documented risk assessments were
5.5.4 5 5 4 consistently used whenever work was undertaken over the side? Permits to work Working over the side Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for working on electrical equipment and systems, and
was there evidence that risk control measures such as permits to work and/or documented risk assessments were consistently Working on electrical equipment and Bridge, Engine Control Room, Engine Room, Forecastle, Interview
5.5.5 5 5 5 used whenever work was undertaken on electrical equipment and systems? Permits to work systems Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated - Electrician / ETO, Steering Gear

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the control of hazardous energy, and was evidence
available, through documented risk assessment or permits, that hazardous energy sources were routinely identified and Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Interview - Deck
5.5.6 5 5 6 isolated before working on, or in, machinery, systems or spaces where hazardous energy could be present? Permits to work Control of hazardous energy Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Officer, Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing, maintenance and calibration of the vessel’s
portable and personal gas measurement instruments, and was the equipment on board sufficient, in good working order, Portable and personal gas measurement
5.6.1 5 6 1 regularly tested and periodically calibrated? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems instruments Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Pumproom

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the atmosphere in double-hull and
double bottom spaces for flammable gas, and were records available to confirm that appropriate measurements had been Testing the atmosphere in double-hull and
5.6.2 5 6 2 taken using the equipment fitted to, or provided on, the vessel? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems double bottom spaces for flammable gas Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection systems Fixed gas detection systems required by
5.6.3 5 6 3 required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems the IGC Code Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection system
required by the IGF Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated in accordance Fixed gas detection system required by
5.6.4 5 6 4 with company procedures and manufacturer’s instructions? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems the IGF Code Rotational 1 1 0 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Engine Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the cargo pump room fixed gas detection
system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and alarm activation points set in accordance with Cargo pump room fixed gas detection
5.6.5 5 6 5 company procedures and manufacturer's instructions? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems system Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the oxygen sensors and associated alarms fitted
in the space, or spaces, containing the inert gas system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and
5.6.6 5 6 6 alarm activation points set in accordance with company procedures and manufacturer's instructions? Fixed and portable gas detecting systems Oxygen sensors in inert gas system spaces. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Had all onboard incidents been reported and investigated in accordance with company procedures, and was an incident Incident investigation reports for defined
5.7.1 5 7 1 investigation report or a summarised lessons learned bulletin available for each incident at or above a defined threshold? Safety Management incidents Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None Binary Documentation, Pre-board

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company incident and near-miss reporting procedure and was evidence
available to demonstrate that incidents and near-misses had been investigated and closed out in accordance with the Incident and near-miss reporting
5.7.2 5 7 2 company procedure? Safety Management procedure Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for holding and documenting shipboard safety
meetings and was evidence available that safety concerns raised at the meetings were acknowledged and addressed by shore
5.7.3 5 7 3 management? Safety Management Shipboard safety meetings Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Rating

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company work planning procedures and were records available to Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Engine Control Room,
5.7.4 5 7 4 demonstrate that onboard work planning meetings had been conducted and documented in accordance with the procedures? Safety Management Work planning procedure Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Interview - Rating
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and implementation of the company Stop Work Authority
5.7.5 5 7 5 policy and procedure? Safety Management Stop Work Authority Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Anywhere

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for risk assessment, as appropriate to their duties, Risk assessments for new, non-routine,
5.7.6 5 7 6 and was there evidence of the development and review of risk assessments in accordance with the procedures? Safety Management unplanned or specified tasks Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Rating, Interview Senior Officer
Were Safety Data Sheets (SDS) available on board for all cargo, bunkers, chemicals, paints and other products being handled,
5.7.7 5 7 7 and were crew members familiar with their use? Safety Management Safety Data Sheets. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Forecastle, Steering Gear

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) procedure and was there
evidence that SIMOPS were considered during work planning and the required controls implemented for the duration of such Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Engine Control Room,
5.7.8 5 7 8 operations? Safety Management procedure Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Interview - Rating
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the main deck areas, and had Safety inspection of the main deck and
5.8.1 5 8 1 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections mooring areas. Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck, Mooring Decks
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the machinery spaces, and had
5.8.2 5 8 2 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections Safety inspection of the machinery space. Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room, Steering Gear
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the cargo pumproom, and had
5.8.3 5 8 3 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections Safety inspections of the cargo pumproom Core 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Pumproom
 Were the Master and officers familiar with the procedure for safety inspections of the cargo machinery rooms, and had
5.8.4 5 8 4 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections Cargo machinery rooms safety inspections Core 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Compressor Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the forecastle, and had
5.8.5 5 8 5 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections Safety inspection of the forecastle spaces Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Forecastle

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the accommodation, and had Safety inspections of the accommodation
5.8.6 5 8 6 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections spaces Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Internal Accommodation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the ballast and/or bunker Ballast and/or bunker pumproom safety
5.8.7 5 8 7 pumproom, and had inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Area Safety Inspections inspection Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company lifting and rigging procedures, and was evidence available to
demonstrate that each item of lifting and rigging equipment had been maintained, inspected and tested in accordance with Lifting and rigging equipment procedures,
5.9.1 5 9 1 the procedure? Lifting and Rigging maintenance and inspection Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Interview - Rating, Main Deck

Where the vessel was fitted with a single cargo hose handling crane, was a risk assessment available which identified the
minimum spare parts that must be carried onboard to ensure continued operation in the event of a single component failure, Spare parts for a single cargo hose
5.9.2 5 9 2 and were the identified spare parts available onboard? Lifting and Rigging handling crane. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary None Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Room

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the pilot boarding
5.10.1 5 10 1 arrangements, and was the equipment provided in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with industry best practice? Safe Access Pilot boarding arrangements Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the accommodation ladders,
and were the accommodation ladders in good order and used in accordance with the company procedure and manufacturer’s
5.10.2 5 10 2 instructions? Safe Access Accommodation ladders Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for providing safe access to the vessel while
alongside a terminal/berth, and was safe access provided by the ship’s portable gangway, the vessel’s accommodation ladder Safe access to the vessel while alongside a
5.10.3 5 10 3 or a shore gangway? Safe Access terminal/berth Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company personnel transfer by crane procedure, and where a personnel
transfer basket (PTB) and accessories were provided, were these in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with
5.10.4 5 10 4 company procedures and manufacturer’s recommendations? Safe Access Personnel transfer by crane Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had these procedures
5.10.5 5 10 5 been complied with? Safe Access Helicopter operations Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had the crew involved
5.10.6 5 10 6 received appropriate training? Safe Access Helicopter facilities Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Main Deck

Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the escape routes from the machinery spaces, pump rooms, compressor
rooms, accommodation spaces and, when in port, from the vessel, and were these routes clearly marked, unobstructed and Compressor Room, Engine Room, Internal Accommodation,
5.10.7 5 10 7 well illuminated? Safe Access Escape routes Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Interview - Rating, Main Deck, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the management of samples of bunker fuel oil
5.11.1 5 11 1 and Annex I and/or Annex II cargoes as applicable, and were samples being properly stored and eventually disposed of? Sample Management Cargo and bunker sample management. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Chief Engineer's Office, Main Deck

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures that addressed the use of respiratory protective
5.12.1 5 12 1 equipment during cargo operations, and did the procedures prohibit the use of filter type respirators for this purpose? Safety Equipment Respiratory protective equipment Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of the decontamination showers and eyewash Decontamination showers and eyewash
5.12.2 5 12 2 stations on deck, and were these facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use? Safety Equipment stations. Rotational 2 1 0 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Cargo Record Book, and did the entries
contained in the Cargo Record Book accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by MARPOL
6.1.1 6 1 1 Annex II? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Cargo Record Book Rotational 2 1 0 1 0 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Part II, and did the
entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part II accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by
6.1.2 6 1 2 MARPOL Annex I? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Oil Record Book Part II Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Part I, and
did the entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part I accurately record the machinery space operations required to be
6.1.3 6 1 3 documented by MARPOL Annex I? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Oil Record Book Part I Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Engine Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for maintaining the Garbage Record Book in accordance
with the Garbage Management Plan, and did the entries contained in the Garbage Record Book accurately record the garbage
6.1.4 6 1 4 management activities required to be documented by MARPOL Annex V? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Garbage Record Book Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Engine Room, Interview - Rating

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Ozone-depleting Substances
Record Book, and did the entries contained in the Ozone-depleting Substances Record Book accurately record the operations
6.1.5 6 1 5 and emissions required to be documented by MARPOL Annex VI? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Ozone Depleting Substances Record Book Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Engine Control Room
Were the documents and records required by MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13 for the control of NOx and associated MARPOL Annex VI NOx Compliance and
6.1.6 6 1 6 emissions in good order? Pollution Prevention - Record Books Record Keeping. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Engine Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the arrangements to drain the cargo pumproom bilges in the event of flooding or Flooding or accidental leakage of cargo
6.2.1 6 2 1 accidental leakage, and were these arrangements in good order? Cargo and Bunker Operations pumproom bilges Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Pumproom

Were cargo system overboard and sea suction valves checked and verified as closed and secured prior to commencement of Cargo system overboard and sea suction
6.2.2 6 2 2 cargo transfer, and where provided, were sea valve-testing arrangements in order and regularly monitored for leakage? Cargo and Bunker Operations valves Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for inspections and pressure tests of the bunker oil (HFO
6.2.3 6 2 3 and MDO) pipeline system, and had the tests been performed and the results suitably recorded? Cargo and Bunker Operations Bunker pipeline system pressure testing Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation of the ballast water management
system (BWMS), and was the equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures and
6.3.1 6 3 1 manufacturer’s instructions? Ballast Operations Ballast water management system (BWMS) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Main Deck, Pumproom

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for the removal of small quantities of oil or
chemical spilled and contained on deck, and was suitable response equipment available, in satisfactory condition and Main deck oil or chemical spill clean up
6.4.1 6 4 1 effectively deployed? Deck Area Pollution Prevention equipment. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the disposal of accumulations of water contaminated Disposal of oily water in the forecastle and
6.4.2 6 4 2 with oil and/or marine pollutants in the forecastle and other internal spaces, and had the procedures been implemented? Deck Area Pollution Prevention other internal spaces Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Forecastle, Pumproom, Steering Gear
Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the machinery space bilges in the event Emergency arrangements to pump out the
6.5.1 6 5 1 of flooding, and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? Machinery Space Pollution Prevention machinery space bilges Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room

Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for the safe use of the incinerator, and was the incinerator in
6.5.2 6 5 2 satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedure and in compliance with MARPOL? Machinery Space Pollution Prevention Incinerator operation. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil filtering equipment, and
was the oil filtering equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedure, manufacturer’s
6.6.1 6 6 1 instructions and MARPOL Annex I? Oil Discharge Monitors Oil filtering equipment. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room, Interview - Engineer Officer

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil discharge monitoring and control
system, and was the oil discharge monitoring and control system in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the Oil discharge monitoring and control
6.6.2 6 6 2 company procedures, manufacturer’s instructions and MARPOL Annex I? Oil Discharge Monitors system (ODME) Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck, Pumproom
Was security threat and risk assessment an integral part of voyage planning, and did the passage plan contain security related Security threat and risk assessment during
7.1.1 7 1 1 information for each leg of the voyage? Ship Routing passage planning. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None None Graduated Bridge
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for hardening the vessel when entering areas of increased Documentation, Exterior Decks, Interview - Security Officer, Main
7.2.1 7 2 1 security risk, and was there a Vessel Hardening Plan (VHP) available? Ship Hardening and access control Vessel hardening. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Deck
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures to control access to the vessel in port and to
7.2.2 7 2 2 ensure the safety of visitors, and were these procedures effectively implemented? Ship Hardening and access control Controlling access to the vessel Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Approaching Vessel, Forecastle, Main Deck, Mooring Decks
Were the Master and officers familiar with regional maritime security reporting requirements and operation of the ship Ship security reporting and
7.3.1 7 3 1 security alert system (SSAS) and had this equipment been regularly tested? Communications and Monitoring communications Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Internal Accommodation
Did the Ship Security Officer (SSO) have a valid Certificate of Proficiency and a full understanding of their role, and were ship
7.4.1 7 4 1 security records of port calls being maintained as required by SOLAS? Ship Security Officer Ship Security Officer (SSO). Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Documentation, Interview - Rating, Interview - Security Officer
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for cyber security risk management, and had these Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Engine Control
7.5.1 7 5 1 procedures been fully implemented? Cyber Security Cyber security risk management. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the inert gas system, and had the inert gas
system been used in accordance with ISGOTT guidance, with cargo tanks maintained in an inert condition at all times, except
8.1.1 8 1 1 when it was necessary to be gas-free for entry? Oil Inert gas system usage on oil tankers. Core 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures and international regulations for the planning,
preparation, conduct and documentation of crude oil washing operations (COW), and was the COW system in satisfactory
8.1.2 8 1 2 condition and used in accordance with the company procedures for each COW operation? Oil Crude Oil Washing operations (COW) Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck, Pumproom
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the isolation of individual cargo tanks from the
8.1.3 8 1 3 common venting system in accordance with SOLAS, and were these procedures being followed? Oil Cargo tank isolation from venting system. Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for planning and documenting cargo tank cleaning
8.1.4 8 1 4 operations after the carriage of volatile products, and had these procedures been followed? Oil Oil cargo tank cleaning procedures. Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the inert gas system, and had the
8.2.1 8 2 1 inert gas system been used in accordance with these procedures, industry guidance, and SOLAS and IBC regulations? Chemicals Chemical tanker inert gas system usage. Core 1 0 0 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes, and had
8.2.2 8 2 2 these procedures been followed? Chemicals Carriage of inhibited chemical cargoes. Core 1 0 0 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the Procedures and Arrangements Manual, Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular, and was this
8.2.3 8 2 3 information readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning and operations? Chemicals Procedures and Arrangements Manual. Rotational 1 1 0 1 0 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for planning and documenting cargo tank cleaning
8.2.4 8 2 4 operations after the carriage of volatile and/or toxic products, and had these procedures been followed? Chemicals Chemical tank cleaning procedures. Rotational 2 1 0 0 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatible cargoes
8.2.5 8 2 5 during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed? Chemicals Chemical cargo compatibility charts. Rotational 2 1 0 0 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IBC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitable
8.2.6 8 2 6 respiratory and eye protection? Chemicals Escape sets required by IBC Code. Rotational 2 1 0 0 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Internal Accommodation, Interview - Rating
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety equipment required by the IBC Safety equipment required by the IBC
8.2.7 8 2 7 Code, including SCBAs, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition ready for immediate use? Chemicals Code. Rotational 2 1 0 0 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Forecastle, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required by the IBC Protective equipment required by the IBC
8.2.8 8 2 8 Code, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition and suitable for the products being handled? Chemicals Code. Rotational 2 1 0 0 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Internal Accommodation, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the inert gas generator, and had the system
8.3.1 8 3 1 been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Oil and Chemical Inert gas generator Core 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the nitrogen generator inert gas system, and
8.3.2 8 3 2 had the system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Oil and Chemical Nitrogen generator inert gas system Core 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the flue gas inert gas system, and had the
8.3.3 8 3 3 system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Oil and Chemical Flue gas inert gas system Core 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and setting of the cargo tank
8.3.4 8 3 4 high-level and high-high-level alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set? Oil and Chemical Cargo tank high level and overfill alarms. Core 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for dipping, ullaging and sampling Gauging and sampling static accumulator
8.3.5 8 3 5 flammable static accumulator cargoes in non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? Oil and Chemical cargo in non-inerted tanks. Core 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for loading flammable static accumulator cargoes Loading static accumulator cargo into non-
8.3.6 8 3 6 into non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? Oil and Chemical inerted tanks. Core 1 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration of the inert gas system fixed oxygen
analyser, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
8.3.7 8 3 7 instructions and company procedures? Oil and Chemical IGS oxygen analyser Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the cargo system Emergency Shutdown (ESD) system, where fitted, and/or
the cargo pump emergency stop controls, and was there evidence that the systems and equipment had been tested in Oil and Chemical Tanker ESD and/or cargo Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck,
8.3.8 8 3 8 accordance with company procedures? Oil and Chemical pump emergency stop controls. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Pumproom
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and testing of cargo, vapour and inert Pressure testing and inspection of cargo,
8.3.9 8 3 9 gas pipelines, and were records available for these activities? Oil and Chemical inert gas and vapour pipelines. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck, Pumproom
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, testing and operation of the vapour
8.3.10 8 3 10 collection system, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical Vapour collection system. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for cargo tank washing after the Oil and chemical tank cleaning in non-inert
8.3.11 8 3 11 carriage of volatile products in a non-inert atmosphere, and had these procedures been followed? Oil and Chemical tanks. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of portable cargo Portable ullage/temperature/interface
ullage/temperature/interface (UTI) measurement and sampling equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition (UTI) measurement and sampling
8.3.12 8 3 12 and used in accordance with the company procedures? Oil and Chemical equipment. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the primary and secondary cargo
8.3.13 8 3 13 tank venting systems in accordance with SOLAS, and were these systems correctly set? Oil and Chemical Secondary venting systems. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
8.3.14 8 3 14 the cargo tank venting systems, and were the systems in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical Cargo tank venting systems. Rotational 1 1 0 0 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring leakage into the cofferdams of deepwell
8.3.15 8 3 15 pumps, and had regular purging of the cofferdams taken place to identify any excessive leakage? Oil and Chemical Deepwell pump cofferdam purging. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Interview - Deck Rating, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the non-return devices
8.3.16 8 3 16 installed in the inert gas system, and were these devices in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical Inert gas system non-return devices Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Graduated Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold reducers,
8.3.17 8 3 17 spool pieces and other portable pipework, and were these items in satisfactory condition and properly fitted when in use? Oil and Chemical Manifold reducers and spool pieces. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-
8.3.18 8 3 18 (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical breaking (P/V) device(s) Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the indicators and alarms in the inert gas
system, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions Indicators and alarms for the inert gas
8.3.19 8 3 19 and company procedures? Oil and Chemical system Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the connections and interconnections to the inert gas
system for routine and emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition and clearly Connections and interconnections to/with
8.3.20 8 3 20 identified as to their purpose? Oil and Chemical the inert gas system piping Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo heating, and was the cargo heating system in
8.3.21 8 3 21 satisfactory condition and tested and used in accordance with the company procedure? Oil and Chemical Cargo heating system Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing on-board doping operations, and had these
8.3.22 8 3 22 procedures been complied with? Oil and Chemical Cargo doping and additives. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and calibration of the cargo Cargo tank temperature monitoring
8.3.23 8 3 23 temperature monitoring equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical systems. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections at the cargo
8.3.24 8 3 24 manifolds, and were the manifold arrangements in satisfactory condition? Oil and Chemical Cargo manifold arrangements. Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Manifold
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for receiving nitrogen from shore for operations
8.3.25 8 3 25 such as inerting, purging or padding cargo tank, or for clearing cargo lines? Oil and Chemical Receiving nitrogen from shore Rotational 2 1 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes, and had
8.4.1 8 4 1 these procedures been followed? LPG Carriage of inhibited cargoes. Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
8.4.2 8 4 2 Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out cargo sampling operations? LPG Cargo sampling Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatible cargoes and Segregating incompatible cargoes and
8.4.3 8 4 3 refrigerants during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed? LPG refrigerants Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe carriage of propylene oxide (PO), ethylene Carriage of propylene oxide (PO) and/or
8.4.4 8 4 4 oxide (EO) and PO-EO mixtures? LPG ethylene oxide (EO) Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room, Main Deck
Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IGC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitable
8.4.5 8 4 5 respiratory and eye protection? LPG Escape sets as required by the IGC Code Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Internal Accommodation, Interview - Rating
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the cargo tank
8.4.6 8 4 6 insulation, and was the insulation reported to be in good condition? LPG Cargo tank insulation Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the vent outlets from the cargo containment system fitted with the correct protection screen or flame screen required Vent outlet protection screens or flame
8.4.7 8 4 7 for the cargo being carried, and were the screens in satisfactory condition? LPG screens Rotational 2 0 0 1 0 0 Binary None None Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, testing and calibration of the custody Custody transfer measurement system
8.5.1 8 5 1 transfer measurement system (CTMS), and was the system in satisfactory condition? LNG (CTMS) Rotational 2 0 1 0 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of
8.5.2 8 5 2 the Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)? LNG Gas Combustion Unit (GCU) Rotational 2 0 1 0 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room
 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance and testing of the safety
8.5.3 8 5 3 arrangements for the LNG gas fuel supply system, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition? LNG LNG gas fuel supply system Rotational 2 0 1 0 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for protecting the hull structure from low temperature Cold spots and cofferdam temperature
8.5.4 8 5 4 exposure, and was temperature monitoring and cofferdam heating equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition? LNG monitoring and heating equipment. Rotational 2 0 1 0 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and setting of the Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.1 8 6 1 independent cargo tank high-level and overfill alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set? Code) Cargo tank overfill alarms Core 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master, officers, and ratings involved with cargo operations, familiar with the functions of the vessel’s cargo transfer
Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Cargo Manifold, Interview - Deck
8.6.2 8 6 2 maintained? Code) Cargo transfer Emergency Shut Down (ESD) Core 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Rating, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and setting of the Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.3 8 6 3 cargo tank relief valves? Code) Cargo tank relief valves Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Was a ship specific Cargo System Operation Manual provided on board, and were the Master and officers familiar with its Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.4 8 6 4 content? Code) Cargo System Operation Manual Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring the integrity of the containment system
and maintaining the atmosphere in the interbarrier spaces and/or hold spaces in a safe condition, and had records been Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Maintaining the atmosphere in the
8.6.5 8 6 5 maintained? Code) interbarrier spaces and/or hold spaces Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the management and operation of the cargo alarm Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.6 8 6 6 systems, and had these procedures been followed? Code) Cargo system alarm management Rotational 1 0 1 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.7 8 6 7 the vessel’s inert gas system and its associated equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Code) Inert gas system Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Engine Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections at the cargo Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.8 8 6 8 manifolds, and were the manifold arrangements in satisfactory condition? Code) Gas vessel cargo manifolds Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Manifold, Interview - Deck Rating

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold reducers, Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Manifold reducers, spool pieces and other
8.6.9 8 6 9 spool pieces and other portable pipework, and were these items in satisfactory condition and properly fitted when in use? Code) portable pipework Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Cargo Manifold
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out emergency discharge operations, and was Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.10 8 6 10 any required additional equipment in satisfactory condition? Code) Emergency discharge operations Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection and maintenance of cargo and Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Cargo and vapour pipeline insulation and
8.6.11 8 6 11 vapour pipeline insulation and expansion arrangements, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition? Code) expansion arrangements Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary None Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety, rescue and recovery equipment, Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.12 8 6 12 including SCBAs, required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment ready for immediate use? Code) IGC safety, rescue and recovery equipment Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required by the IGC Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Protective equipment required by the IGC
8.6.13 8 6 13 Code, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition and suitable for the products being handled? Code) Code Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of the Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.14 8 6 14 reliquefaction plant, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Code) Reliquefaction plant Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of the cargo Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.15 8 6 15 heaters, vaporisers and condensers, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Code) Cargo heaters, vaporisers and condensers Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the filling limits (FL) and loading limits (LL) for the cargo tanks, and was this Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.16 8 6 16 information readily available in the cargo control room or position? Code) Filling Limits (FL) and Loading Limits (LL) Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.17 8 6 17 the vent mast fire suppression system, and was the system in satisfactory condition? Code) Vent mast fire suppression system Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting water leakage into hold or insulation spaces Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Water or liquid cargo leakage into a hold
8.6.18 8 6 18 and for dealing with any water or liquid cargo that may have accumulated in these spaces? Code) or insulation space Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the submerged motor electric cargo Gas (common to all vessels under IGC
8.6.19 8 6 19 pumps and the testing of their associated safety devices and alarms, and had these procedures been followed? Code) Submerged motor electric cargo pumps Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and setting of the Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Liquid line, hold, insulation and inter-
8.6.20 8 6 20 liquid line, hold, insulation and inter-barrier space relief valves? Code) barrier space relief valves Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures that gave guidance on cargo tank environmental control
during inerting, gas freeing and gassing up operations, thermal load hazards during tank cool-down, and the minimum cargo Gas (common to all vessels under IGC Inerting, gas freeing and gassing up
8.6.21 8 6 21 temperature? Code) operations Rotational 2 0 1 1 0 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems,
8.7.1 8 7 1 and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations BLS Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems Core 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures, including appropriate arrival checklists, detailing the
necessary checks and actions to be carried out when approaching an offshore terminal prior to DP and/or bow loading Checks when approaching an offshore Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Engine Control
8.7.2 8 7 2 operations, and had these procedures been complied with? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations terminal. Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the equipment for control and monitoring of the Bow Loading System (BLS), and Control and monitoring of the Bow
8.7.3 8 7 3 was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations Loading System (BLS) Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of Bow Loading System (BLS) operation,
8.7.4 8 7 4 the Bow Loading System (BLS), including alarms and indicators, and was the BLS area well maintained and free from oil. Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations inspection, testing and maintenance. Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the deluge system in the bow loading Deluge system in the bow loading system
8.7.5 8 7 5 system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations (BLS) area Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed foam fire extinguishing system in
the bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order and regularly inspected, tested and Fixed foam fire extinguishing system in the
8.7.6 8 7 6 maintained? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations bow loading system (BLS) area Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room
Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Chief Engineer's Office, Engine
8.7.7 8 7 7 Are all items of DP equipment in satisfactory condition and are they included in the Planned Maintenance System (PMS)? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations DP Equipment condition and maintenance Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s DP FMEA, was the latest version available on board, and were any Bridge, Chief Engineer's Office, Documentation, Engine Control
8.7.8 8 7 8 modifications to the DP system included? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations DP FMEA Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the gas and fire detection systems in the Gas and fire detection systems in the bow
8.7.9 8 7 9 bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly tested, maintained and calibrated? Shuttle Tanker Cargo Operations loading system (BLS) area Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bow Loading Area, Bridge, Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of
8.8.1 8 8 1 the cargo hold hatch-covers, and were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition? OBO / Combination Carriers Cargo hold hatch covers Core 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for changing cargo modes, including ship-specific
8.8.2 8 8 2 checklists, and were there records to show that these procedures had been followed? OBO / Combination Carriers Changing between wet and dry cargoes Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and all officers directly involved in cargo transfer operations familiar with the company procedure for
planning cargo and ballast transfers, and were records available to demonstrate that cargo operations had been planned in Cargo and ballast transfer planning and
8.99.1 8 99 1 accordance with the company procedure and conducted in accordance with the agreed plan? All types execution. Core 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Were the Master and all officers with a direct responsibility for cargo, tank cleaning or ballast operations familiar with the
requirements of the ISGOTT Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL) and, were appropriate sections of the SSSCL in use with all Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room, Main Deck, Mooring
8.99.2 8 99 2 applicable provisions and agreements maintained throughout? All types Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL) Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Decks, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures which provided guidance on the level of supervision and
support for cargo / port operations, and were operations supervised and supported by an appropriate team in accordance
8.99.3 8 99 3 with the company procedures? All types Cargo operations team composition. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for checking and testing cargo and ballast system valves,
8.99.4 8 99 4 and were the valves and the remote control system in satisfactory condition? All types Cargo and ballast valve testing. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, maintenance, testing, calibration and
8.99.5 8 99 5 comparison of the fixed cargo tank level gauging system, and was the system in satisfactory condition and fully operational? All types Fixed cargo tank level gauging system. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedure and manufacturer’s instructions for the periodic
testing of the stability and loading instrument(s), and were records maintained to confirm that tests had been completed in
8.99.6 8 99 6 accordance with the procedure? All types Stability and loading instrument(s) Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room

Where the vessel was subject to loading restrictions and/or intact stability concerns at any phase of a voyage or cargo
operation, had the company developed procedures to manage these restrictions and/or concerns, and were the Master and
8.99.7 8 99 7 cargo officers familiar with the company procedures? All types Loading limitations Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the selection, inspection, testing and storage of cargo
8.99.8 8 99 8 transfer hoses, and were the hoses in satisfactory condition? All types Cargo Transfer hoses. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for periodically verifying the accuracy of cargo and
ballast system controls and indicators, and were legible and up-to-date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams available at the cargo Cargo and ballast system controls,
8.99.9 8 99 9 control location(s) and in the pumproom(s) as applicable? All types indicators, mimics and displays. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary None Graduated Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers a familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the bonding
arrangements for independent cargo tanks, process plant and cargo pipelines and, were these arrangements in satisfactory
8.99.10 8 99 10 condition? All types Cargo system bonding arrangements. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck

Was there a procedure in place to complete an independent check of the entire cargo liquid, vapour and venting pipeline
system prior to commencement of cargo operations to ensure that valves, vacuum breakers, sampling connections, drains and Independent verification of cargo piping
8.99.11 8 99 11 unused connections or interconnections were correctly set, and blanked or capped, where appropriate? All types systems line up. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for the testing and correct operation of the mooring
winch brakes, and were records available to demonstrate that brakes had been tested periodically, after maintenance or when Testing and correct operation of the
9.1.1 9 1 1 there was evidence of premature brake slippage? Mooring Equipment Management mooring winch brakes Core 1 1 1 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Mooring Decks
Was the vessel satisfactorily moored in accordance with both the terminal mooring plan and the mooring configurations
9.1.2 9 1 2 permitted by the vessel’s Mooring System Management Plan? Mooring Equipment Management Was the vessel satisfactorily moored Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Mooring Decks

Were the Master, deck officers, and ratings involved with mooring operations, familiar with the content of the Line
Management Plan and was the plan maintained in accordance with company instructions with mooring line, mooring tail and Line Management Plan (LMP)
9.1.3 9 1 3 joining shackle certificates available for each item included within the Line Management Plan? Mooring Equipment Management implementation. Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Mooring Decks

9.1.4 9 1 4 Did all mooring lines, mooring tails and joining shackles, including those carried as spares, meet industry guidelines? Mooring Equipment Management Mooring lines, tails and mooring shackles. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Graduated None Graduated Documentation
Were the Master and all officers familiar with the vessel specific emergency towing procedure, and was the emergency towing Emergency towing procedure and
9.2.1 9 2 1 equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition and ready for immediate use? Emergency Towing Arrangement equipment Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Aft Mooring Deck, Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Forecastle

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for anchoring operations, and were records available
9.3.1 9 3 1 to confirm that recent anchoring operations had been conducted in compliance with company expectations? Mooring and Anchoring Procedures Anchoring operations Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Forecastle

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedure that defined mooring team supervision
and composition for the various mooring and anchoring operations likely to be undertaken, and was evidence available that Mooring and Anchoring Team Mooring team supervision and
9.4.1 9 4 1 each mooring work space had been supervised and manned in accordance with company expectations? Management composition Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Mooring Decks

Were the deck officers and ratings involved with mooring operations familiar with the safe operation of the mooring winches Mooring and Anchoring Team Dangers of working with and around
9.4.2 9 4 2 and the dangers of working with and around mooring lines during mooring operations and while under tension? Management mooring lines Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Mooring Decks
Were the appropriate industry checklists used during STS operations, and were comprehensive records of these operations
9.5.1 9 5 1 maintained? STS Operation Management STS operations checklists Core 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Mooring Decks

Where the vessel was involved in an “at sea” STS operation, was an accurate Joint Plan of Operation available onboard, were
the Master and deck officers familiar with its content, and were operations being conducted in accordance with its Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Documentation, Interview - Deck
9.5.2 9 5 2 requirements? STS Operation Management STS Joint Plan of Operation (JPO) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Officer, Interview - Deck Rating

9.5.3 9 5 3 Were the Master, officers and deck ratings familiar with the vessel’s STS Operations Plan? STS Operation Management STS Operations Plan Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Engine Control Room, Main Deck
Vapour hose securing arrangement for
9.6.1 9 6 1 Were the vapour collection system manifold arrangements suitable for hose handling at buoy moorings? Single Point Mooring buoy moorings. Rotational 1 0 0 0 1 1 Binary None None Cargo Manifold
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for mooring at an SPM or F(P)SO and were the fittings
9.6.2 9 6 2 required accurately described in the HVPQ? Single Point Mooring SPM mooring arrangements. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Documentation, Forecastle

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
9.7.1 9 7 1 the bow mooring system for offshore terminals, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Shuttle Tanker Mooring Systems Shuttle tanker bow mooring system Rotational 2 0 0 0 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Forecastle

Had the Chief Engineer prepared Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforced the
company expectations with regards to engine room management and, if so, had all engineer officers signed to acknowledge
10.1.1 10 1 1 their understanding of the same? Engineering Procedures Chief Engineer's standing and daily orders Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for testing main propulsion, steering
gear, thrusters and power generation plant prior to use and at critical points during a voyage or operation, and were checklists Testing main propulsion, steering gear,
10.1.2 10 1 2 and log book entries completed as required? Engineering Procedures thrusters & power generation plant Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Steering Gear

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic rounds and monitoring of the
machinery space, and were log book entries and checklists available to confirm that the rounds had been completed as Periodic rounds of machinery space for
10.1.3 10 1 3 required? Engineering Procedures non-UMS vessels Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic machinery space rounds and Periodic machinery space rounds during
monitoring of the machinery space during both manned and unmanned (UMS) periods, and were log book entries and both manned and unmanned (UMS)
10.1.4 10 1 4 checklists available to confirm that the inspections had been completed as required? Engineering Procedures periods Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation, inspection and testing of the means provided to
10.1.5 10 1 5 control propulsion machinery and related auxiliary systems locally in the event of failure of a remote-control system? Engineering Procedures Local control of propulsion machinery Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room
Were the officers familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency generator and were records available to demonstrate
10.2.1 10 2 1 that the emergency generator had been tested according to company procedures? Machinery Status Emergency generator Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Exterior Decks

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection, maintenance
10.2.2 10 2 2 and testing of the ship’s emergency batteries, and were the batteries fully charged and in satisfactory condition? Machinery Status Battery emergency source of power. Core 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, calibration and
maintenance of the exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS), and were required safety and regulatory measures being complied
10.2.3 10 2 3 with? Machinery Status Exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room, Engine Room

10.2.4 10 2 4 Were seawater pipelines, sea chests and seawater pumps in satisfactory condition and free of temporary repairs? Machinery Status seawater pipelines Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Graduated Graduated Graduated Engine Room

Were the officers familiar with the company procedure for testing the bilge monitoring devices within their area of
responsibility, and were records available to demonstrate that the bilge monitoring devices and associated alarms had been
10.2.5 10 2 5 tested in accordance with the company procedure? Machinery Status Bilge monitoring devices Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Cargo Control Room, Engine Room, Forecastle

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and testing Emergency compressed air machinery
10.2.6 10 2 6 of the emergency air compressor and emergency air reservoir, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Machinery Status starting system. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room
10.3.1 10 3 1 Was suitable deck insulation provided to the front and rear of electrical switchboards, and was it in good order? Safety Management Switchboard deck insulation. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary None None Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the engineer officers familiar with the purpose and setting of the insulation monitoring devices provided on the primary Electrical distribution system switchboard
10.3.2 10 3 2 and secondary distribution systems, and were the distribution switchboards free of significant earth faults? Safety Management earth monitoring. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for safe entry into the machinery Entry into the machinery space during Bridge, Engine Control Room, Engine Room, Interview - Engineer
10.3.3 10 3 3 space(s) during UMS operation, including the operation and testing of the dead man alarm, if fitted? Safety Management UMS. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Officer
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the engineers’ alarm, and was the alarm in good
10.3.4 10 3 4 order, tested regularly and the results recorded? Safety Management Engineers' alarm. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room, Interview - Engineer Officer
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the machinery alarm, and was the alarm in good Bridge, Engine Control Room, Interview - Deck Officer, Interview -
10.3.5 10 3 5 order, tested regularly and the results recorded? Safety Management Machinery alarm Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engineer Officer
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and regular testing of
10.3.6 10 3 6 watertight doors, and were the watertight doors in satisfactory condition? Safety Management Watertight doors. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Bridge, Engine Room
Was gas welding and cutting equipment in good order, and spare oxygen and acetylene cylinders stored apart in a well-
10.3.7 10 3 7 ventilated location outside of the accommodation and engine room? Safety Management Gas welding and cutting equipment. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary None None Engine Room, Exterior Decks
Were engineer officers and ratings familiar with the safety precautions for the use of electric welding equipment, were these
10.3.8 10 3 8 safety precautions posted, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Safety Management Electric welding equipment. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room, Interview - Engine Rating

Were the responsible vessel staff familiar with the company procedure for managing and using the planned maintenance
system, and was the system updated with an accurate record of onboard maintenance and spare parts in accordance with the
10.4.1 10 4 1 procedure? Planned Maintenance Systems Planned maintenance system (PMS) Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room
Did the vessel operator subscribe to a lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program and was a procedure in place to act on the
10.4.2 10 4 2 results and trends identified by the analysis? Planned Maintenance Systems Lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office

Were the Master, Chief Engineer, officers, and ratings involved in bunkering operations, familiar with the company bunkering
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations had been planned and conducted in
10.5.1 10 5 1 accordance with the company procedure? Conventional Bunkering Management Conventional bunkering operations Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis,
and were records available to demonstrate that samples had been taken and retained or analysed in accordance with the
10.5.2 10 5 2 procedure? Conventional Bunkering Management Bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room
 Were the Chief Engineer and senior engineer officers familiar with the company and vessel specific fuel changeover
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that fuel grade changeovers had been completed in compliance with
10.5.3 10 5 3 the procedures and MARPOL regulations? Conventional Bunkering Management Fuel change over procedures Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 0 None Graduated Graduated Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the LNG fuel tank water-spray system for
cooling and fire prevention on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and
10.6.1 10 6 1 maintained? LNG Bunkering Management LNG fuel tank water-spray system Rotational 2 1 0 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Main Deck

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings, involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the functions of
the vessel’s LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in
10.6.2 10 6 2 good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? LNG Bunkering Management LNG gas fuel bunkering ESD system Rotational 1 1 0 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Manifold

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the company LNG
(or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations had LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) Chief Engineer's Office, Engine Control Room, Interview - Engine
10.6.3 10 6 3 been planned and conducted in accordance with the company procedures? LNG Bunkering Management bunkering procedures. Rotational 1 1 0 1 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Rating
LNG fuel bunkering control station and
10.6.4 10 6 4 Were the safety measures at the bunkering control station and bunkering manifold area in satisfactory condition? LNG Bunkering Management manifold. Rotational 2 1 0 1 1 1 Binary None None Aft Mooring Deck, Main Deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s remote controls for fuel
and lube oil valves, emergency fuel and lube oil pump shut-offs and oil tank quick closing valves, and were the systems in good Remote controls for fuel and lube oil
10.7.1 10 7 1 working order? Fire Protection Measures system valves Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Emergency Headquarters., Engine Control Room, Engine Room

Were the Master and officers familiar with the measures to prevent fire in the machinery spaces caused by flammable liquid Fire prevention in machinery spaces - hot
10.7.2 10 7 2 spraying onto a hot surface and, were the protective measures provided regularly inspected and properly maintained? Fire Protection Measures surfaces and oil spray Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 0 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room
Were the main engine crankcase oil mist detectors, engine bearing temperature monitors or equivalent devices and
10.7.3 10 7 3 associated alarms in good order? Fire Protection Measures Main engine crank case monitoring. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room
Where hydraulic power packs were located within the main engine compartment, were fire protection measures provided, Hydraulic power packs fire protection
10.7.4 10 7 4 and if so, where they in satisfactory condition? Fire Protection Measures measures. Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Room
Was photograph no.1, bow area from dead ahead, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.1 11 1 1 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Bow area from dead ahead Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Forecastle
Was photograph no.2, hull forward end starboard side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.2 11 1 2 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Hull forward end starboard side Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.3, hull forward end port side representative, of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.3 11 1 3 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Hull forward end port side Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.4, hull aft end starboard side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.4 11 1 4 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Hull aft end starboard side Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.5, hull aft end port side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection
11.1.5 11 1 5 and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Hull aft end port side Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.6, transom from right astern, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.6 11 1 6 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Transom from right astern Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Aft Mooring Deck
Was photograph no.7, forecastle port side looking towards fairleads, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Forecastle port side looking towards
11.1.7 11 1 7 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison fairleads Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Forecastle
Was photograph no.8, forecastle starboard side looking towards fairleads, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Forecastle starboard side looking towards
11.1.8 11 1 8 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison fairleads Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Forecastle
Was photograph no.9, port or starboard windlass, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.9 11 1 9 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Port or starboard windlass Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Forecastle

Was photograph no.10, forward main deck showing condition of deck (and external framing), representative of the condition Forward main deck showing condition of
11.1.10 11 1 10 as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison deck (and external framing) Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.11, Forward main deck showing condition of piperack, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Forward main deck showing condition of
11.1.11 11 1 11 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Piperack Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.12, one mooring winch including the brake setting arrangement, representative of the condition as seen One mooring winch including the brake
11.1.12 11 1 12 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison setting arrangement Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Mooring Decks
Was photograph no.13, one hose crane with an overall view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.13 11 1 13 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison One hose crane with an overall view Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.14, one hose crane hoisting winch, stowed wire and limit switches, representative of the condition as seen One hose crane hoisting winch, stowed
11.1.14 11 1 14 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison wire and limit switches Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.15, starboard manifold looking from aft to forward, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Starboard manifold looking from aft to
11.1.15 11 1 15 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison forward Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Cargo Manifold
Was photograph no.16, starboard manifold looking forward to aft representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time
11.1.16 11 1 16 of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Starboard manifold looking forward to aft Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Cargo Manifold
Was photograph no.17, aft main deck showing condition of deck (and external framing), representative of the condition as Aft main deck showing condition of deck
11.1.17 11 1 17 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison (and external framing) Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.18, aft main deck showing condition of Piperack, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Aft main deck showing condition of
11.1.18 11 1 18 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Piperack Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.19, poop deck looking from midships to starboard including fairleads, representative of the condition as Poop deck looking from midships to
11.1.19 11 1 19 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison starboard including fairleads Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Aft Mooring Deck
Was photograph no.20, aft emergency towing equipment storage arrangement, representative of the condition as seen Aft emergency towing equipment storage
11.1.20 11 1 20 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison arrangement Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Aft Mooring Deck
Was photograph no.21, aft emergency towing equipment deployment system, representative of the condition as seen Aft emergency towing equipment
11.1.21 11 1 21 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison deployment system Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Aft Mooring Deck
Was photograph no.22, lifeboat and davit, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and,
11.1.22 11 1 22 if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Lifeboat and davit Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Lifeboat deck
Was photograph no.23, the emergency generator or accumulator batteries, representative of the condition as seen onboard at The emergency generator or accumulator
11.1.23 11 1 23 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison batteries Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Exterior Decks
Was photograph no.24, engine room general view showing top of main engine, representative of the condition as seen Engine room general view showing top of
11.1.24 11 1 24 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison main engine Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.25, one generator engine, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection
11.1.25 11 1 25 and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison One generator engine Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.26, the oil filtering equipment, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.26 11 1 26 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison The oil filtering equipment Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.27, the incinerator, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if
11.1.27 11 1 27 so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison The incinerator Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.28, one boiler from the front, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.28 11 1 28 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison One boiler from the front Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.29, one boiler from the top showing control equipment, representative of the condition as seen onboard One boiler from the top showing control
11.1.29 11 1 29 at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison equipment Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.30, purifier room general view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.30 11 1 30 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Purifier room general view Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.31, main engine side showing local control station, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Main engine side showing local control
11.1.31 11 1 31 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison station Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Engine Room
Was photograph no.32, steering gear room general view showing access, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Steering gear room general view showing
11.1.32 11 1 32 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison access Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Steering Gear
Was photograph no.33, main steering gear, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and,
11.1.33 11 1 33 if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Main steering gear Core 1 1 1 1 0 None None None Steering Gear
Was photograph no.40, IG system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device, representative of the condition as seen onboard at IG system pressure/vacuum-breaking
11.1.40 11 1 40 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison (P/V) device Core 1 0 0 1 0 None None None Main Deck

IG system first non-return device (deck

Was photograph no.41, IG system first non-return device (deck seal or double block and bleed arrangement), representative seal or double block and bleed
11.1.41 11 1 41 of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison arrangement) Core 1 0 0 1 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.42, one main cargo pump and, if in pump room, including bilges, representative of the condition as seen One main cargo pump and, if in pump
11.1.42 11 1 42 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison room, including bilges Core 1 0 0 1 0 None None None Main Deck, Pumproom
Was photograph no.50, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.50 11 1 50 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison and discharge valve Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.51, electric motors for deepwell pumps, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.51 11 1 51 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Electric motors for deepwell pumps Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.52, compressor / motor room, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.52 11 1 52 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Compressor / motor room Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.60, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.60 11 1 60 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison and discharge valve Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.61, electric motors for deepwell pumps, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.61 11 1 61 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Electric motors for deepwell pumps Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.62, compressor room internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.62 11 1 62 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Compressor room internal view Core 0 0 1 0 0 None None None Compressor Room
Was photograph no.70, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.70 11 1 70 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison and discharge valve Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.71, a cargo tank vapour dome including cargo system relief valves, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank vapour dome including cargo
11.1.71 11 1 71 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison system relief valves Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.72, compressor house internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.72 11 1 72 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Compressor house internal view Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Compressor Room
Was photograph no.80, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.80 11 1 80 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison and discharge valve Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.81, general view of one Moss sphere, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.81 11 1 81 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison General view of one moss sphere Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Main Deck
Was photograph no.82, compressor house internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.82 11 1 82 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Compressor house internal view Core 0 1 0 0 0 None None None Compressor Room

Was photograph no.90, bow mooring arrangement from forward looking aft showing chain stopper, representative of the Bow mooring arrangement from forward
11.1.90 11 1 90 condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison looking aft showing chain stopper Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Was photograph no.91, bow mooring arrangement from aft looking forward showing winch, representative of the condition as Bow mooring arrangement from aft
11.1.91 11 1 91 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison looking forward showing winch Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Was photograph no.92, general view of hose connection area, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.92 11 1 92 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison General view of hose connection area Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Was photograph no.93, hose coupling arrangement, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.93 11 1 93 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison Hose coupling arrangement Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Was photograph no.94, general view forward bow thruster room, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time
11.1.94 11 1 94 of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison General view forward bow thruster room Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Was photograph no.95, forward bow thruster room showing one azimuth thruster, representative of the condition as seen Forward bow thruster room showing one
11.1.95 11 1 95 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Photograph comparison azimuth thruster Core 0 0 0 1 0 None None None Bow Loading Area
Where the vessel traded in polar waters, had the Master, Chief Mate and officers in charge of a navigational watch undertaken
12.1.1 12 1 1 the additional training required by the Polar Code? Ice operations training Polar Code training Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 None None Binary Documentation

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the life-saving and fire- Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and
12.2.1 12 2 1 fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? Sub-zero LSA & FFA procedures equipment in sub-zero temperatures Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Exterior Decks, Main Deck
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the engine room machinery Sub-zero machinery operation Engine room machinery and systems in
12.3.1 12 3 1 and systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? procedures sub-zero temperatures Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Engine Control Room, Engine Room
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the cargo and ballast systems Sub-zero cargo and ballast operation Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero
12.4.1 12 4 1 in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? procedures temperatures Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Compressor Room, Main Deck, Pumproom

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the deck machinery, including Sub-zero deck machinery operation Deck machinery and mooring equipment
12.5.1 12 5 1 mooring systems, in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? procedures in sub-zero temperatures Rotational 2 1 1 1 1 1 Binary Graduated Graduated Cargo Control Room, Main Deck, Mooring Decks
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating in areas affected by ice, and had they
12.6.1 12 6 1 received suitable training? Ice navigation procedures Navigating in areas affected by ice Rotational 1 1 1 1 1 1 None Graduated Graduated Bridge, Documentation
No. QuestionTextShort

2.3.5 Condition Assessment Program (CAP)

2.3.5 Condition Assessment Program (CAP)

2.6.2 VOC Management Plan.

3.2.1 Static navigational assessment

Dynamic navigational assessment by a company

3.2.2 representative

Dynamic navigational assessment by a specialist

3.2.3 contractor

3.2.4 Unannounced remote navigational assessment

Comprehensive cargo audit by a company

3.2.5 representative

Comprehensive engineering audit by a company

3.2.6 representative
 Comprehensive mooring and anchoring audit by
3.2.7 a company representative

3.2.8 Behavioural Competency Assessment Programme

3.3.1 Shore-based Bridge Team Management training

3.3.3 Cargo operations shore-based simulator course

Shore-based engine room management simulator

3.3.4 course

Training for Dynamically Positioned (DP)

3.3.5 operators

LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel training and

3.3.6 familiarisation.

Familiarisation with ECDIS equipment installed on

3.5.3 board.
4.1.1 ECDIS set up and operation

4.1.11 Preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR

4.2.4 Electronic chart management.

4.5.1 Annual DP Trial report and supporting exercises.

4.5.2 DP Position Reference Systems

4.5.3 DP events and incidents

4.5.4 DP operations manual

4.5.5 Field Operations Manuals

4.5.5 Field Operations Manuals

Emergency plans and drills for LNG bunker

5.1.17 operations

5.1.18 Cargo leak into double hull spaces.

 OBO Forward space emergency pumping
5.1.19 arrangements

OBO Forward space emergency pumping

5.1.19 arrangements

Machinery space fixed carbon dioxide fire

5.2.4 extinguishing system

Machinery space fixed high-expansion foam fire

5.2.5 extinguishing system

Machinery space fixed pressure water-spraying

5.2.6 fire extinguishing system

Fixed dry chemical powder fire extinguishing

5.2.11 system

Machinery space fixed water-based or equivalent

5.2.13 local application fire-fighting system

Cargo, ballast and stripping pump temperature

5.2.14 sensing devices

5.2.15 Deck foam system, including portable applicators

 Davit-launched lifeboats, release mechanisms
5.4.1 and launching appliances

Free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and its

5.4.2 launching appliance

5.4.3 Dedicated rescue boat and launching appliance

Testing the atmosphere in double-hull and

5.6.2 double bottom spaces for flammable gas

Fixed gas detection system required by the IGF

5.6.4 Code

5.6.5 Cargo pump room fixed gas detection system

5.6.6 Oxygen sensors in inert gas system spaces.

5.6.6 Oxygen sensors in inert gas system spaces.

5.8.3 Safety inspections of the cargo pumproom

Ballast and/or bunker pumproom safety

5.8.7 inspection
 Ballast and/or bunker pumproom safety
5.8.7 inspection

Spare parts for a single cargo hose handling

5.9.2 crane.

Spare parts for a single cargo hose handling

5.9.2 crane.

5.10.4 Personnel transfer by crane

5.10.4 Personnel transfer by crane

5.10.5 Helicopter operations

5.10.5 Helicopter operations

5.10.6 Helicopter facilities

5.12.2 Decontamination showers and eyewash stations.

5.12.2 Decontamination showers and eyewash stations.

6.1.1 Cargo Record Book

6.1.1 Cargo Record Book

Flooding or accidental leakage of cargo

6.2.1 pumproom bilges

6.3.1 Ballast water management system (BWMS)

Oil discharge monitoring and control system

6.6.2 (ODME)

7.2.1 Vessel hardening.

8.1.1 Inert gas system usage on oil tankers.

8.1.2 Crude Oil Washing operations (COW)

8.1.3 Cargo tank isolation from venting system.

8.1.3 Cargo tank isolation from venting system.

8.2.3 Procedures and Arrangements Manual.

8.2.3 Procedures and Arrangements Manual.

8.2.7 Safety equipment required by the IBC Code.

8.3.1 Inert gas generator

8.3.1 Inert gas generator

8.3.2 Nitrogen generator inert gas system

8.3.2 Nitrogen generator inert gas system

8.3.3 Flue gas inert gas system

8.3.3 Flue gas inert gas system

Gauging and sampling static accumulator cargo in

8.3.5 non-inerted tanks.
 Gauging and sampling static accumulator cargo in
8.3.5 non-inerted tanks.

Loading static accumulator cargo into non-

8.3.6 inerted tanks.

Loading static accumulator cargo into non-

8.3.6 inerted tanks.

8.3.7 IGS oxygen analyser

8.3.7 IGS oxygen analyser

8.3.7 IGS oxygen analyser

8.3.7 IGS oxygen analyser

8.3.10 Vapour collection system.

8.3.10 Vapour collection system.

8.3.11 Oil and chemical tank cleaning in non-inert tanks.

8.3.15 Deepwell pump cofferdam purging.

8.3.16 Inert gas system non-return devices

8.3.16 Inert gas system non-return devices

8.3.16 Inert gas system non-return devices

8.3.16 Inert gas system non-return devices

Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V)

8.3.18 device(s)

Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V)

8.3.18 device(s)

Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V)

8.3.18 device(s)

Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V)

8.3.18 device(s)

8.3.19 Indicators and alarms for the inert gas system

8.3.19 Indicators and alarms for the inert gas system

8.3.19 Indicators and alarms for the inert gas system

8.3.19 Indicators and alarms for the inert gas system

Connections and interconnections to/with the

8.3.20 inert gas system piping
 Connections and interconnections to/with the
8.3.20 inert gas system piping

Connections and interconnections to/with the

8.3.20 inert gas system piping

Connections and interconnections to/with the

8.3.20 inert gas system piping

8.3.21 Cargo heating system

8.3.21 Cargo heating system

8.3.25 Receiving nitrogen from shore

8.3.25 Receiving nitrogen from shore

Carriage of propylene oxide (PO) and/or ethylene

8.4.4 oxide (EO)

8.4.6 Cargo tank insulation

8.5.2 Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)

8.6.14 Reliquefaction plant

8.6.17 Vent mast fire suppression system

8.6.19 Submerged motor electric cargo pumps

8.7.1 BLS Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems

8.7.1 BLS Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems

8.7.2 Checks when approaching an offshore terminal.

8.7.2 Checks when approaching an offshore terminal.

Control and monitoring of the Bow Loading

8.7.3 System (BLS)

Control and monitoring of the Bow Loading

8.7.3 System (BLS)

Bow Loading System (BLS) operation, inspection,

8.7.4 testing and maintenance.

Bow Loading System (BLS) operation, inspection,

8.7.4 testing and maintenance.

Deluge system in the bow loading system (BLS)

8.7.5 area

Fixed foam fire extinguishing system in the bow

8.7.6 loading system (BLS) area

8.7.7 DP Equipment condition and maintenance

8.7.8 DP FMEA
 Gas and fire detection systems in the bow loading
8.7.9 system (BLS) area

Gas and fire detection systems in the bow loading

8.7.9 system (BLS) area

8.8.1 Cargo hold hatch covers

8.8.1 Cargo hold hatch covers

8.8.2 Changing between wet and dry cargoes

8.8.2 Changing between wet and dry cargoes

8.99.5 Fixed cargo tank level gauging system.

8.99.8 Cargo Transfer hoses.

8.99.8 Cargo Transfer hoses.

Vapour hose securing arrangement for buoy
9.6.1 moorings.

9.6.2 SPM mooring arrangements.

9.7.1 Shuttle tanker bow mooring system

9.7.1 Shuttle tanker bow mooring system

 Periodic rounds of machinery space for non-UMS
10.1.3 vessels

Periodic machinery space rounds during both

10.1.4 manned and unmanned (UMS) periods

10.2.1 Emergency generator

10.2.2 Battery emergency source of power.

10.2.3 Exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS)

Emergency compressed air machinery starting

10.2.6 system.

10.3.3 Entry into the machinery space during UMS.

10.3.5 Machinery alarm

10.3.6 Watertight doors.

10.4.2 Lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program

10.5.2 Bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis

10.6.1 LNG fuel tank water-spray system

10.6.2 LNG gas fuel bunkering ESD system

LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering

10.6.3 procedures.

10.6.4 LNG fuel bunkering control station and manifold.

10.7.3 Main engine crank case monitoring.

10.7.3 Main engine crank case monitoring.

10.7.4 Hydraulic power packs fire protection measures.

12.1.1 Polar Code training

Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and

12.2.1 equipment in sub-zero temperatures

Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and

12.2.1 equipment in sub-zero temperatures
 Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and
12.2.1 equipment in sub-zero temperatures

Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and

12.2.1 equipment in sub-zero temperatures

Engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero

12.3.1 temperatures

Engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero

12.3.1 temperatures

Engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero

12.3.1 temperatures

Engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero

12.3.1 temperatures

Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero

12.4.1 temperatures

Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero

12.4.1 temperatures

Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero

12.4.1 temperatures

Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero

12.4.1 temperatures

Deck machinery and mooring equipment in sub-

12.5.1 zero temperatures
 Deck machinery and mooring equipment in sub-
12.5.1 zero temperatures

Deck machinery and mooring equipment in sub-

12.5.1 zero temperatures

Deck machinery and mooring equipment in sub-

12.5.1 zero temperatures

12.6.1 Navigating in areas affected by ice

12.6.1 Navigating in areas affected by ice

12.6.1 Navigating in areas affected by ice

12.6.1 Navigating in areas affected by ice

Question Type

Had the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment

Programme (CAP)? HVPQ

Had the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment

Programme (CAP)? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the VOC Management Plan, and had
the procedures for minimising VOC emissions set out in the Plan been
implemented and documented as required? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a static navigational

assessment by a suitably qualified and experienced company representative had
been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational

assessment by a suitably qualified and experienced company representative had
been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection
questionnaire? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational

assessment by a suitably qualified specialist contractor had been completed while
on passage as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that an unannounced remote

navigational assessment, which included review of VDR & ECDIS data by an
independent contractor or specialist company representative, had been completed
as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive cargo audit
by a suitably qualified and experienced company representative had been
completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? PIQ

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive

engineering audit by a suitable qualified and experienced company representative
had been completed as declared in the pre-inspection questionnaire? PIQ
Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive mooring
and anchoring audit by a suitably qualified and experienced company
representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection
questionnaire? PIQ

Had the vessel operator implemented a Behavioural Competency Assessment

Programme onboard and was there evidence available that assessments were
being conducted for navigation, cargo, mooring and engineering operations by
approved assessors? PIQ

Had the Master and all navigation officers attended a shore-based Bridge Team
Management training course within the previous five years? PIQ

Had the Master, deck officers, and cargo/gas engineer where carried, attended a
shore-based simulator course covering routine and emergency cargo operations
within the previous five years? PIQ

Had the Chief Engineer and all engineer officers attended a shore-based engine
room management simulator course covering routine and emergency machinery
operations within the previous five years? PIQ

Did all key personnel onboard involved in Dynamically Positioned (DP) operations
have appropriate training in accordance with IMO and International Marine
Contractors Association (IMCA) guidelines and local regulations applicable to the
area of operations? PIQ

Had the Master, officers and ratings received the required training and
familiarisation before being assigned duties related to handling LNG or other low-
flashpoint fuel? PIQ

Had the Master and navigation officers been familiarised with the ECDIS
equipment installed on board and were documented records of this familiarisation
available? PIQ
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for
the set up and operation of the ECDIS units fitted to the vessel and were records
available to demonstrate that the ECDIS had been operated in accordance with
company procedures at all stages of a voyage? PIQ

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for
preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR and were records available to demonstrate
that tests of the equipment had been completed as required? PIQ

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company electronic
chart management procedures and were onboard ENCs and RNCs managed,
corrected and used appropriately? PIQ

Was the latest Annual DP Trial report available on board, were the Master and
officers familiar with the contents, and had they taken part in onboard training and
drills involving various DP scenarios? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of
Position Reference Systems (PRS), and was the equipment in satisfactory condition
with sensor offset data readily available to the DPO? PIQ

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for reporting
and recording DP events and incidents, and were all DP parameters being logged
and recorded? PIQ

Was the vessel provided with a comprehensive DP operations manual and were
the Master and officers familiar with its contents, including DP checklists, capability
plots, consequence analysis and activity specific operating guidelines (ASOG)? PIQ

Were up to date Field Operations Manuals on board for each offshore terminal to
which the vessel trades, were the Master and officers familiar with their content,
and were records available of the regular communication checks with terminal
installations as required by Field Specific Operating Guidelines (FSOG)? PIQ

Were up to date Field Operations Manuals on board for each offshore terminal to
which the vessel trades, were the Master and officers familiar with their content,
and were records available of the regular communication checks with terminal
installations as required by Field Specific Operating Guidelines (FSOG)? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans
regarding LNG bunker operations, and had drills taken place to test the
effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with
company procedures? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures setting out the
actions to be taken in the event of a cargo leak into a double hull tank, and was all
required equipment available and in satisfactory condition? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump
out the spaces forward of the collision bulkhead in the event of flooding and were
these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump
out the spaces forward of the collision bulkhead in the event of flooding and were
these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the vessel’s fixed carbon dioxide fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment
in good working order and available for immediate use, with the release procedure
and operating instructions displayed at the control stations? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the vessel’s machinery space fixed high-expansion foam fire extinguishing system,
and was the equipment in good working order, available for immediate use, and
with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the vessel’s machinery space fixed pressure water-spraying fire extinguishing
system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate
use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the vessel’s fixed dry chemical powder fire extinguishing system, and was the
equipment in good working order and readily available for immediate use, with
operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations. HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the machinery space fixed water-based or equivalent local application fire-fighting
system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for
immediate use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control
stations? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose of the cargo, ballast and
stripping pump temperature sensing devices, and was there evidence that alarm
activation points had been correctly set and tested in accordance with company
procedures and manufacturer's instructions? PIQ

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of
the vessel’s deck foam system, including portable applicators, and was the system
in good working order and available for immediate use, with operating instructions
displayed at the control station? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the davit-launched
lifeboats, release mechanisms and launching appliances, and were they in good
order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and
tested as required? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the free-fall lifeboat,
its release systems and its launching appliance, and was the equipment in
satisfactory condition with records available to demonstrate that it had been
inspected and tested in accordance with company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the dedicated rescue
boat and launching appliance, and were they in good order with records available
to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as required? HVPQ

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for
testing the atmosphere in double-hull and double bottom spaces for flammable
gas, and were records available to confirm that appropriate measurements had
been taken using the equipment fitted to, or provided on, the vessel? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the vessel’s fixed gas detection system required by the IGF Code, and was the
equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated in
accordance with company procedures and manufacturer’s instructions? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the
cargo pump room fixed gas detection system, and was the equipment fully
operational with sensors calibrated and alarm activation points set in accordance
with company procedures and manufacturer's instructions? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the
oxygen sensors and associated alarms fitted in the space, or spaces, containing the
inert gas system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated
and alarm activation points set in accordance with company procedures and
manufacturer's instructions? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the
oxygen sensors and associated alarms fitted in the space, or spaces, containing the
inert gas system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated
and alarm activation points set in accordance with company procedures and
manufacturer's instructions? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety
inspections of the cargo pumproom, and had inspections been effective in
identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety
inspections of the ballast and/or bunker pumproom, and had inspections been
effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety
inspections of the ballast and/or bunker pumproom, and had inspections been
effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? PIQ

Where the vessel was fitted with a single cargo hose handling crane, was a risk
assessment available which identified the minimum spare parts that must be
carried onboard to ensure continued operation in the event of a single component
failure, and were the identified spare parts available onboard? HVPQ

Where the vessel was fitted with a single cargo hose handling crane, was a risk
assessment available which identified the minimum spare parts that must be
carried onboard to ensure continued operation in the event of a single component
failure, and were the identified spare parts available onboard? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company personnel transfer by
crane procedure, and where a personnel transfer basket (PTB) and accessories
were provided, were these in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with
company procedures and manufacturer’s recommendations? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company personnel transfer by
crane procedure, and where a personnel transfer basket (PTB) and accessories
were provided, were these in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with
company procedures and manufacturer’s recommendations? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for
helicopter/ship operations, and had these procedures been complied with? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for
helicopter/ship operations, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for
helicopter/ship operations, and had the crew involved received appropriate
training? PIQ

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of
the decontamination showers and eyewash stations on deck, and were these
facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use? HVPQ

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of
the decontamination showers and eyewash stations on deck, and were these
facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining
the Cargo Record Book, and did the entries contained in the Cargo Record Book
accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by
MARPOL Annex II? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining
the Cargo Record Book, and did the entries contained in the Cargo Record Book
accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by
MARPOL Annex II? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the arrangements to drain the cargo
pumproom bilges in the event of flooding or accidental leakage, and were these
arrangements in good order? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe
operation of the ballast water management system (BWMS), and was the
equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company
procedures and manufacturer’s instructions? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of
the oil discharge monitoring and control system, and was the oil discharge
monitoring and control system in satisfactory condition and used in accordance
with the company procedures, manufacturer’s instructions and MARPOL Annex I? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for hardening
the vessel when entering areas of increased security risk, and was there a Vessel
Hardening Plan (VHP) available? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of
the inert gas system, and had the inert gas system been used in accordance with
ISGOTT guidance, with cargo tanks maintained in an inert condition at all times,
except when it was necessary to be gas-free for entry? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures and
international regulations for the planning, preparation, conduct and
documentation of crude oil washing operations (COW), and was the COW system
in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures for
each COW operation? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
isolation of individual cargo tanks from the common venting system in accordance
with SOLAS, and were these procedures being followed? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
isolation of individual cargo tanks from the common venting system in accordance
with SOLAS, and were these procedures being followed? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the
Procedures and Arrangements Manual, Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of
Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular,
and was this information readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning
and operations? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the
Procedures and Arrangements Manual, Certificate of Fitness for the Carriage of
Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular,
and was this information readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning
and operations? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to
the safety equipment required by the IBC Code, including SCBAs, and was the
equipment in satisfactory condition ready for immediate use? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the inert gas generator, and had the system been operated and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the inert gas generator, and had the system been operated and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the nitrogen generator inert gas system, and had the system been operated and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company
procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the nitrogen generator inert gas system, and had the system been operated and
maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company
procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the flue gas inert gas system, and had the system been operated and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the flue gas inert gas system, and had the system been operated and maintained in
accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company
procedures for dipping, ullaging and sampling flammable static accumulator
cargoes in non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? HVPQ
Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company
procedures for dipping, ullaging and sampling flammable static accumulator
cargoes in non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? HVPQ

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for
loading flammable static accumulator cargoes into non-inerted tanks, and were
these procedures being followed? HVPQ

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for
loading flammable static accumulator cargoes into non-inerted tanks, and were
these procedures being followed? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration
of the inert gas system fixed oxygen analyser, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration
of the inert gas system fixed oxygen analyser, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration
of the inert gas system fixed oxygen analyser, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration
of the inert gas system fixed oxygen analyser, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
inspection, testing and operation of the vapour collection system, and was this
equipment in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
inspection, testing and operation of the vapour collection system, and was this
equipment in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company
procedures for cargo tank washing after the carriage of volatile products in a non-
inert atmosphere, and had these procedures been followed? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring
leakage into the cofferdams of deepwell pumps, and had regular purging of the
cofferdams taken place to identify any excessive leakage? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the non-return devices installed in the inert gas system, and were
these devices in satisfactory condition? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the non-return devices installed in the inert gas system, and were
these devices in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the non-return devices installed in the inert gas system, and were
these devices in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the non-return devices installed in the inert gas system, and were
these devices in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert
gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert
gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert
gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and
maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert
gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the indicators and alarms in the inert gas system, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the indicators and alarms in the inert gas system, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the indicators and alarms in the inert gas system, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of
the indicators and alarms in the inert gas system, and had the equipment been
operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
instructions and company procedures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
connections and interconnections to the inert gas system for routine and
emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory
condition and clearly identified as to their purpose? HVPQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
connections and interconnections to the inert gas system for routine and
emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory
condition and clearly identified as to their purpose? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
connections and interconnections to the inert gas system for routine and
emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory
condition and clearly identified as to their purpose? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
connections and interconnections to the inert gas system for routine and
emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory
condition and clearly identified as to their purpose? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo
heating, and was the cargo heating system in satisfactory condition and tested and
used in accordance with the company procedure? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo
heating, and was the cargo heating system in satisfactory condition and tested and
used in accordance with the company procedure? PIQ

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for
receiving nitrogen from shore for operations such as inerting, purging or padding
cargo tank, or for clearing cargo lines? HVPQ

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for
receiving nitrogen from shore for operations such as inerting, purging or padding
cargo tank, or for clearing cargo lines? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe
carriage of propylene oxide (PO), ethylene oxide (EO) and PO-EO mixtures? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
inspection and maintenance of the cargo tank insulation, and was the insulation
reported to be in good condition? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of the Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)? HVPQ

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe
operation and maintenance of the reliquefaction plant, and was the equipment in
satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the vent mast fire suppression
system, and was the system in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation of the submerged motor electric cargo pumps and the testing of their
associated safety devices and alarms, and had these procedures been followed? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
vessel’s Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in good
working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the
vessel’s Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in good
working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures, including
appropriate arrival checklists, detailing the necessary checks and actions to be
carried out when approaching an offshore terminal prior to DP and/or bow loading
operations, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures, including
appropriate arrival checklists, detailing the necessary checks and actions to be
carried out when approaching an offshore terminal prior to DP and/or bow loading
operations, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the equipment for control and
monitoring of the Bow Loading System (BLS), and was the equipment in good
working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the equipment for control and
monitoring of the Bow Loading System (BLS), and was the equipment in good
working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the Bow Loading System (BLS),
including alarms and indicators, and was the BLS area well maintained and free
from oil. PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the Bow Loading System (BLS),
including alarms and indicators, and was the BLS area well maintained and free
from oil. PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the deluge system in the bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in
good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the fixed foam fire extinguishing system in the bow loading system (BLS) area, and
was the equipment in good working order and regularly inspected, tested and
maintained? PIQ
Are all items of DP equipment in satisfactory condition and are they included in the
Planned Maintenance System (PMS)? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s DP FMEA, was the latest
version available on board, and were any modifications to the DP system included? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the gas and fire detection systems in the bow loading system (BLS) area, and was
the equipment in good working order, regularly tested, maintained and calibrated? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the gas and fire detection systems in the bow loading system (BLS) area, and was
the equipment in good working order, regularly tested, maintained and calibrated? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of the cargo hold hatch-covers, and
were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of the cargo hold hatch-covers, and
were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for changing
cargo modes, including ship-specific checklists, and were there records to show
that these procedures had been followed? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for changing
cargo modes, including ship-specific checklists, and were there records to show
that these procedures had been followed? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, maintenance, testing, calibration and comparison of the fixed cargo
tank level gauging system, and was the system in satisfactory condition and fully
operational? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
selection, inspection, testing and storage of cargo transfer hoses, and were the
hoses in satisfactory condition? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
selection, inspection, testing and storage of cargo transfer hoses, and were the
hoses in satisfactory condition? PIQ
Were the vapour collection system manifold arrangements suitable for hose
handling at buoy moorings? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for mooring at
an SPM or F(P)SO and were the fittings required accurately described in the HVPQ? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the bow mooring system for
offshore terminals, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of the bow mooring system for
offshore terminals, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? PIQ
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures
for periodic rounds and monitoring of the machinery space, and were log book
entries and checklists available to confirm that the rounds had been completed as
required? HVPQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures
for periodic machinery space rounds and monitoring of the machinery space
during both manned and unmanned (UMS) periods, and were log book entries and
checklists available to confirm that the inspections had been completed as
required? HVPQ

Were the officers familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency generator
and were records available to demonstrate that the emergency generator had
been tested according to company procedures? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for the regular inspection, maintenance and testing of the ship’s
emergency batteries, and were the batteries fully charged and in satisfactory
condition? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for the operation, calibration and maintenance of the exhaust gas
cleaning system (EGCS), and were required safety and regulatory measures being
complied with? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for the operation, inspection and testing of the emergency air
compressor and emergency air reservoir, and was the equipment in satisfactory
condition? HVPQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for safe entry into the machinery space(s) during UMS operation,
including the operation and testing of the dead man alarm, if fitted? HVPQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the
machinery alarm, and was the alarm in good order, tested regularly and the results
recorded? HVPQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the
operation, inspection and regular testing of watertight doors, and were the
watertight doors in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Did the vessel operator subscribe to a lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program
and was a procedure in place to act on the results and trends identified by the
analysis? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company
procedures for bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis, and were records available to
demonstrate that samples had been taken and retained or analysed in accordance
with the procedure? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of
the LNG fuel tank water-spray system for cooling and fire prevention on deck, and
was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and
maintained? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings, involved in LNG bunkering
operations, familiar with the functions of the vessel’s LNG (or other low-flashpoint
fuel) bunkering Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in
good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? PIQ

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings involved in LNG bunkering
operations, familiar with the company LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations
had been planned and conducted in accordance with the company procedures? PIQ

Were the safety measures at the bunkering control station and bunkering manifold
area in satisfactory condition? PIQ

Were the main engine crankcase oil mist detectors, engine bearing temperature
monitors or equivalent devices and associated alarms in good order? PIQ

Were the main engine crankcase oil mist detectors, engine bearing temperature
monitors or equivalent devices and associated alarms in good order? PIQ

Where hydraulic power packs were located within the main engine compartment,
were fire protection measures provided, and if so, where they in satisfactory
condition? PIQ

Where the vessel traded in polar waters, had the Master, Chief Mate and officers
in charge of a navigational watch undertaken the additional training required by
the Polar Code? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the life-saving and fire-fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the life-saving and fire-fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the life-saving and fire-fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the life-saving and fire-fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero temperatures,
and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero temperatures,
and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero temperatures,
and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the engine room machinery and systems in sub-zero temperatures,
and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had
these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had
these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had
these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had
these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the deck machinery, including mooring systems, in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the deck machinery, including mooring systems, in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the deck machinery, including mooring systems, in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the
operability of the deck machinery, including mooring systems, in sub-zero
temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating
in areas affected by ice, and had they received suitable training? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating
in areas affected by ice, and had they received suitable training? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating
in areas affected by ice, and had they received suitable training? PIQ

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating
in areas affected by ice, and had they received suitable training? PIQ
HVPQ Or PIQ Question Operand

1.4.6(1) Condition Assessment Programme - Does the

ship have a Condition Assessment Programme (CAP)
rating? Equal To

2.3.5001(1) Is the vessel enrolled in a condition

assessment programme (CAP) - Enrolled in a condition
assessment programme (CAP) Equal To

2.6.2(1) Is the vessel provided with a Volatile Organic

Compounds (VOC) Management Plan? - Volatile Organic
Compounds (VOC) Management Plan? Equal To

3.2.1(1) Has a static navigational assessment been

conducted by a member of the shore staff during the
preceding twelve months? - Static navigational
assessment conducted? Equal To

3.2.2(1) Has a dynamic navigational assessment been

conducted by a member of the shore staff during the
preceding twenty four months? - Dynamic navigational
assessment - conducted by a member of the shore staff Equal To

3.2.3(1) Has a dynamic navigational assessment been

conducted by a third party contractor during the
preceding twelve months? - Dynamic navigational
assessment - conducted by a third party contractor Equal To

3.2.4(1) Has an unannounced remote navigational

assessment, which included review of VDR & ECDIS
data, been conducted by an independent contractor or
specialist company representative during the preceding
twelve months? - Unannounced remote navigational a Equal To

3.2.5(1) Has a comprehensive cargo audit in accordance

with TMSA 6.4.2 been conducted by a member of the
shore staff during the preceding twelve months?
(include all operations observed and evaluated) -
Comprehensive cargo audit Equal To

3.2.6(1) Has a comprehensive engineering audit in

accordance with TMSA 4.4.5 been conducted by a
member of the shore staff during the preceding twelve
months? (include all operations observed and
evaluated) - Comprehensive engineering audit Equal To
3.2.7(1) Has a comprehensive mooring and anchoring
audit in accordance with TMSA 6A.4.3 been conducted
by a member of the shore staff during the preceding
twelve months? (include all operations observed and
evaluated) - Comprehensive mooring and anchoring Equal To

3.2.8(1) Has a Behavioural Competency Assessment and

Verification process (in alignment with the OCIMF /
INTERTANKO best practice guidance) been instigated
onboard? - Behavioural Competency Assessment and
Verification process Equal To

3.3.1(1) Have the master and all navigation officers

onboard at the time of the inspection attended a
BCM/BRM training course which included navigational
exercises conducted within a Bridge Simulator within
the past five years? - BTM/BRM training course a Equal To

3.3.3(1) Have the master, all deck officers and cargo

engineers onboard at the time of the inspection
attended a shore-based cargo simulator course
appropriate to the vessel type in the previous five
years? - Shore based cargo simulation course Equal To

3.3.4(1) Had the Chief Engineer and all engineer officers

attended a shore-based engine room management
simulator course covering routine and emergency
machinery operations within the previous five years? -
Shore-based engine room management simulator cou Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

4.1.1(1) What is the primary means of navigation? -

Primary means of navigation Not Equal To
4.1.1(1) What is the primary means of navigation? -
Primary means of navigation Not Equal To

4.1.11(1) How long is data retained on the main storage

media of the Voyage Data Recorder before it is
overwritten? - Enter time in hours Greater Than

4.1.1(1) What is the primary means of navigation? -

Primary means of navigation Not Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

1.1.10 Type of Hull Not Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

5.2.4(1) What type of fixed fire extinguishing system is

fitted in the machinery space? - Fixed fire fighting
system - machinery space Equal To

5.2.4(1) What type of fixed fire extinguishing system is

fitted in the machinery space? - Fixed fire fighting
system - machinery space Equal To

5.2.4(1) What type of fixed fire extinguishing system is

fitted in the machinery space? - Fixed fire fighting
system - machinery space Equal To

5.3.3 Is a fixed dry powder firefighting system installed

for the cargo area? Equal To

5.2.13(1) Is the vessel fitted with a machinery space

fixed local application fire extinguishing system
(generally, vessels of >2000 grt and with machinery
space >500m3) - Local application fire extinguishing
system Equal To

5.8.3(1) Is the vessel fitted with a cargo pumproom? -

Cargo pumproom Equal To

5.3.1(1) Fixed foam firefighting - Is a fixed foam

firefighting system installed for the cargo area? Equal To
5.3.6 What type of lifeboat(s) is/are fitted? Equal To

5.3.6 What type of lifeboat(s) is/are fitted? Equal To

5.3.7(1) Dedicated rescue boats - Is a dedicated rescue

boat provided? Equal To

1.1.10 Type of Hull Not Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

5.8.3(1) Is the vessel fitted with a cargo pumproom? -

Cargo pumproom Equal To

9.15.5 Are fixed O2 alarms fitted in inert gas generating

spaces? Equal To

5.6.6(1) Are fixed O2 alarms fitted in inert gas

generating spaces (chemical tankers only) - O2 alarms
fitted in inert gas generating spaces (chemical tankers
only)? Equal To

5.8.3(1) Is the vessel fitted with a cargo pumproom? -

Cargo pumproom Equal To

5.8.7(1) Is the vessel fitted with a ballast pumproom? -

Ballast pumproom Equal To
5.8.7(1) Is the vessel fitted with a bunker transfer
pumproom? - Bunker transfer pumproon Equal To

10.9.2(1) Cargo handling cranes - If cranes are fitted,

how many? Equal To

10.9.2(1) Cargo handling cranes - If cranes are fitted,

how many? Equal To

13.1.6 Does the Operator's SMS provide instructions

regarding the transfer of personnel using derricks or
cranes? Equal To

5.10.4(1) Is the vessel provided with a personnel

transfer basket PTB - Personnel transfer basket Equal To

5.2.1(1) ICS Guide to Helicopter/Ship Operations - Does

the ship comply with the ICS Guide to Helicopter/Ship
Operations? Equal To

5.10.6(1) Is the vessel provided with a helicopter facility

conforming to Civil Aviation Authority: CAP437
Standards for Offshore Helicopter Landing Areas (2018)
- Is the vessel provided with a helicopter facility Equal To

5.10.6(1) Is the vessel provided with a helicopter facility

conforming to Civil Aviation Authority: CAP437
Standards for Offshore Helicopter Landing Areas (2018)
- Is the vessel provided with a helicopter facility Equal To

Greater Than Or
2.1.8(1) Certificate of Fitness - Chemicals Equal To

Greater Than Or
2.1.9 Noxious Liquids Certificate Equal To
 Greater Than Or
2.1.8(1) Certificate of Fitness - Chemicals Equal To

Greater Than Or
2.1.9 Noxious Liquids Certificate Equal To

5.8.3(1) Is the vessel fitted with a cargo pumproom? -

Cargo pumproom Equal To

6.3.1(1) Is the vessel fitted with an approved ballast

water management system (BWMS)? - Approved ballast
water management system Equal To

9.5.4(1) Oil Discharge Monitoring Equipment (ODME) -

Is there Oil Discharge Monitoring Equipment (ODME)
fitted? Equal To

7.2.1001(1) Does the vessel's usual trading area include

entering or transit through areas of increased security
risk? - Does the vessel's usual trading area include
entering or transit through areas of increased security
risk? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.15.20(1) Crude Oil Washing - Is a Crude Oil Washing

(COW) installation fitted? Equal To

9.10.5 Are isolating valves fitted to each cargo tank? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To
 Greater Than Or
2.1.8(1) Certificate of Fitness - Chemicals Equal To

Greater Than Or
2.1.9 Noxious Liquids Certificate Equal To

9.33.3 When required by the Chemical Code, is there on

board at least three sets of personnel protection safety
equipment (IBC 14.2.1 / BCH 3.16)? Equal To

9.15.4 Is the inert gas supplied by flue gas, inert gas

generator and/or stored nitrogen? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.4 Is the inert gas supplied by flue gas, inert gas

generator and/or stored nitrogen? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.4 Is the inert gas supplied by flue gas, inert gas

generator and/or stored nitrogen? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To
9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.9.1 Is a vapour return system fitted? Equal To

8.3.10(1) Is the vessel fitted with a VECs/VRS (Oil and

chemical tankers)? - Is the vessel fitted with a VECs/VRS Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

8.3.15(1) Is the vessel fitted with deepwell cargo pumps

(Oil and chemical tankers)? - Deepwell cargo pumps Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To
9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To
9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

9.14.1(3) Heating coils - If Yes, are all the cargo tanks

fitted with heating coils? Equal To

8.3.21(1) If the vessel is a chemical tanker is a cargo

heating system provided? - Cargo heating system Equal To

9.15.1 Is an inert gas system (IGS) fitted? (If No, ignore

remainder of this section) Equal To

9.31.1 By what means is inert gas supplied? Equal To

Greater Than Or
2.1.9 Noxious Liquids Certificate Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Not Equal To

9.111.2 Designed Gas burning Capacity (BOG

compressor running) Greater Than

8.6.14(1) Is the vessel fitted with a reliquification plant?

- Reliquification plant Equal To

9.95.1(7) Tank relief valves - Are snuffers available in

vent masts? Equal To

8.6.19(1) Are there any submerged electric cargo pumps

fitted in the cargo tanks? - Submerged electric cargo
pumps fitted? Equal To
1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

8.7.5(1) Is the vessel fitted with a BLS deluge system in

accordance with NORGAS No.140 - BLS deluge system Equal To

8.7.6(1) Is the vessel fitted with a fixed foam fire

extinguishing system in the BLS area in accordance with
NORGAS No.140 - Fixed foam fire extinguishing system Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

8.7.9(1) Is the vessel fitted with a fixed fire detecting
system in the BLS area in accordance with NORGAS
No.140 - Fixed fire detecting system Equal To

8.7.9(1) Is the vessel fitted with a fixed hydrocarbon gas

detecting system in the BLS area in accordance with
NORGAS No.140 - Fixed hydrocarbon gas detecting
system Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

9.8.1 Can cargo be transferred under closed loading

conditions in accordance with ISGOTT 11.1.6.6? Equal To

9.119.2(1) Transfer hoses - Are transfer hoses available

onboard? Equal To

8.99.8(1) Is the vessel provided with cargo transfer

hoses? - Cargo transfer hoses Equal To
10.6.2(1) Bow chain stoppers - Are bow chain stoppers
fitted? Equal To

10.6.2(1) Bow chain stoppers - Are bow chain stoppers

fitted? Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

1.1.1(1) Vessel Type - Vessel Type Equal To

12.1.10 Is the ship certified for Unmanned Machinery
Space (UMS) operation? Equal To

12.1.10 Is the ship certified for Unmanned Machinery

Space (UMS) operation? Equal To

10.2.1(1) What system provides the primary source of

emergency power - Primary source of emergency power Equal To

10.2.1(1) What system provides the primary source of

emergency power - Primary source of emergency power Equal To

10.2.3(1) Is the vessel fitted with an Exhaust Gas

Cleaning System (EGCS) - Exhaust Gas Cleaning System
(EGCS) Equal To

12.4.3 Motive power of emergency compressor Greater Than

12.1.10 Is the ship certified for Unmanned Machinery

Space (UMS) operation? Equal To

12.1.10 Is the ship certified for Unmanned Machinery

Space (UMS) operation? Equal To

10.3.6(1) Is the vessel fitted with watertight doors

required by SOLAS II-I Reg 13-1 - Is the vessel fitted with
watertight doors? Equal To

10.4.2(1) Is the vessel subscribed to a lube oil analysis

program? - Is the vessel subscribed to a lube oil analysis
program? Equal To

10.5.2(1) Is the vessel subscribed to a fuel oil analysis

program? - Is the vessel subscribed to a fuel oil analysis
program? Equal To
5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the
IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

5.6.4(1) Is the vessel outfitted in accordance with the

IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? - Is the vessel outfitted in
accordance with the IGF Code to use LNG as fuel? Equal To

10.7.3(1) Are provisions fitted to internal combustion

engines to prevent crank case explosion - Auxiliary
Engine(s) - Auxiliary Engines(s) Equal To

10.7.3(1) Are provisions fitted to internal combustion

engines to prevent crank case explosion - Main
Engine(s) - Main Propulsion Engine(s) Equal To

10.7.4(1) Are hydraulic power packs located within the

main machinery compartment? - Are hydraulic power
packs located within the main machinery compartment? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To

12.1.2(1) Does the vessel have an ice notation - Does

the vessel have an ice notation Equal To
12.1.3(1) Does the vessel have a winterisation notation
- Does the vessel have a winterisation notation Equal To

12.1.4(1) Does the vessel trade in areas where sub-zero

temperatures may be routinely expected? - Does the
vessel trade in areas where sub-zero temperatures may
be routinely expected? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To

12.1.2(1) Does the vessel have an ice notation - Does

the vessel have an ice notation Equal To

12.1.3(1) Does the vessel have a winterisation notation

- Does the vessel have a winterisation notation Equal To

12.1.4(1) Does the vessel trade in areas where sub-zero

temperatures may be routinely expected? - Does the
vessel trade in areas where sub-zero temperatures may
be routinely expected? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To

12.1.2(1) Does the vessel have an ice notation - Does

the vessel have an ice notation Equal To

12.1.3(1) Does the vessel have a winterisation notation

- Does the vessel have a winterisation notation Equal To

12.1.4(1) Does the vessel trade in areas where sub-zero

temperatures may be routinely expected? - Does the
vessel trade in areas where sub-zero temperatures may
be routinely expected? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To
12.1.2(1) Does the vessel have an ice notation - Does
the vessel have an ice notation Equal To

12.1.3(1) Does the vessel have a winterisation notation

- Does the vessel have a winterisation notation Equal To

12.1.4(1) Does the vessel trade in areas where sub-zero

temperatures may be routinely expected? - Does the
vessel trade in areas where sub-zero temperatures may
be routinely expected? Equal To

12.1.1(1) Does the vessel have a Certificate for ships

operating in Polar Waters? - Does the vessel have a
Certificate for ships operating in Polar Waters? Equal To

12.1.2(1) Does the vessel have an ice notation - Does

the vessel have an ice notation Equal To

12.1.3(1) Does the vessel have a winterisation notation

- Does the vessel have a winterisation notation Equal To

12.1.4(1) Does the vessel trade in areas where sub-zero

temperatures may be routinely expected? - Does the
vessel trade in areas where sub-zero temperatures may
be routinely expected? Equal To
Response

true

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Yes

Paper charts with no ECDIS required

to be carried (vessel <3,000 gt)
Paper charts with no ECDIS required
to be carried (vessel <3,000 gt)

Paper charts with no ECDIS required

to be carried (vessel <3,000 gt)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Yes

Single hull
OBO

Ore-Oil

CO2

Foam

Water

true

Yes

Yes

true
Conventional

Freefall

true

Single hull

Yes

Yes

true

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

true

Yes

true

No

Yes

0
0

Yes

Yes

true

Yes

true

true

true

true
0

true

IG Generator

Oil Fired Generator

Nitrogen Generator

Nitrogen Generator

Flue Gas

Flue Gas

false
Nitrogen Generator

false

Nitrogen Generator

true

Flue Gas

Nitrogen Generator

Oil Fired Generator

true

Yes

false

Yes

true
Flue Gas

Nitrogen Generator

Oil Fired Generator

true

Flue Gas

Nitrogen Generator

Oil Fired Generator

true

Flue Gas

Nitrogen Generator

Oil Fired Generator

true
Flue Gas

Nitrogen Generator

Oil Fired Generator

true

Yes

false

Nitrogen Generator

LPG Type 2PG

Yes

true

Yes
DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Yes

Yes

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Yes

Yes

OBO

Ore-Oil

OBO

Ore-Oil

true

true

Yes

true

true

DP Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

Shuttle tanker (bow loading)

false

true

Emergency generator

Emergency batteries

Yes

true

true

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes

Yes
No. Question Short Text

Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the vessel’s statutory certification
up to date, were all certificates and documents carried onboard up to date and was the vessel free of conditions of class or
2.1.1 significant memoranda? Maintenance of Statutory Certification

Had the vessel been attended by a company Superintendent at approximately six-monthly intervals and were reports available
to demonstrate that a systematic vessel inspection had been completed during each attendance declared through the pre- Superintendent vessel inspection and
2.2.1 inspection questionnaire? report
Were recent ISM internal audit reports available on board, had corrective action been taken on board to close-out any non-
2.2.2 conformities and had this corrective action been verified by shore management? Internal ISM audit
Was the Master fully conversant with the company’s Safety Management System and had Master’s Reviews of the system
2.2.3 taken place in accordance with the ISM Code and company procedures? Master's Review of the SMS.

Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Enhanced Survey File in accordance
with Classification Society rules, and was the vessel free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the Structural concerns and Enhanced Survey
2.3.1 structural condition of the hull or cargo and ballast tank coatings? File.

Were the Master and Chief Engineer familiar with the company procedure to maintain the Class Survey File, and was the
vessel free of any visible or documentary evidence of concerns with the structural condition of the hull or hold space and
2.3.2 ballast tank coatings? Structural concerns and Class Survey File.

Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the company cargo, ballast & void space inspection and reporting procedure
and, were records available to demonstrate that all inspections had been accomplished within the required time frame with
2.3.3 reports completed in accordance with company instructions? Cargo, ballast & void space inspection

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting leakage of liquids between cargo,
bunker, ballast, void and cofferdam spaces which included inspecting the surface of ballast water prior to discharge, and were Monitoring cargo, ballast & void spaces
2.3.4 records available to show that the necessary checks had been performed? for leakage and contamination
2.3.5 Had the vessel been enrolled in a Classification Society Condition Assessment Programme (CAP)? Condition Assessment Program (CAP)

Were the senior officers familiar with the company procedure for reporting defects to vessel structure, machinery and
equipment to shore-based management through the company defect reporting system and was evidence available to
2.4.1 demonstrate that all defects had been reported accordingly? Defect reporting system

Where defects existed to the vessel’s structure, machinery or equipment, had the vessel operator notified class, flag and/or
the authorities in the port of arrival, as appropriate to the circumstances, and had short term certificates, waivers, exemptions
2.4.2 and/or permissions to proceed the voyage been issued where necessary? Defect reporting to class, flag etc
Had the company Management of Change procedure been effectively implemented for changes affecting structure, machinery
2.5.1 and equipment governed by Classification Society rules or statutory survey? Management of Change

Were the Master, deck officers and engineer officers familiar with the vessel’s Ballast Water Management Plan and were
2.6.1 records available to demonstrate that ballast handling had been conducted in accordance with the plan? Ballast Water Management Plan
Were the Master and officers familiar with the VOC Management Plan, and had the procedures for minimising VOC emissions
2.6.2 set out in the Plan been implemented and documented as required? VOC Management Plan.
Were the Master and senior officers familiar with the contents and requirements of the Ship Energy Efficiency Management Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan
2.6.3 Plan (SEEMP) and had these been fully implemented? (SEEMP).
Was the relevant content of the SMS manuals easily accessible to all personnel on board in a working language(s) understood
2.7.1 by them? Availability of SMS content to all crew.

Did the SMS identify clear levels of authority and lines of communication between the Master, ship's officers, ratings and the Communication lines with the company
2.7.2 company, and were all onboard personnel familiar with these arrangements as they related to their position? and DPA.

Was the OCIMF Harmonised Vessel Particulars Questionnaire (HVPQ) available through the OCIMF SIRE Programme database
2.8.1 completed accurately to reflect the structure, outfitting, management and certification of the vessel? HVPQ accurately completed.

Were records of the most recent Port State Control inspection available onboard, and where deficiencies had been recorded
2.8.2 had these been corrected and closed out in accordance with the company procedure for defects or non-conformities? Last Port State Control Inspection.

Were the officers and ratings suitably qualified to serve onboard the vessel and did the officer matrix posted on the OCIMF
website accurately reflect the qualifications, experience and English Language capabilities of the officers onboard at the time Crew qualifications and matrix
3.1.1 of the inspection? verification.

Were procedures and instructions contained within the Safety Management System and signs posted around the vessel
available in the designated working language of the vessel or a language(s) understood by the crew and, were the Master,
3.1.2 officers and ratings able to communicate verbally in the designated working language? Designated working language.

Did the complement of officers and ratings onboard at the time of inspection meet or exceed the requirements of the
Minimum Safe Manning Document and the declared company standard manning for routine operations, and had senior Minimum, standard and enhanced
3.1.3 officers been relieved to ensure continuity of operational knowledge? manning levels.

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a static navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and experienced
3.2.1 company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? Static navigational assessment

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified and
experienced company representative had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection Dynamic navigational assessment by a
3.2.2 questionnaire? company representative

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a dynamic navigational assessment by a suitably qualified specialist Dynamic navigational assessment by a
3.2.3 contractor had been completed while on passage as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? specialist contractor

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that an unannounced remote navigational assessment, which included
review of VDR & ECDIS data by an independent contractor or specialist company representative, had been completed as Unannounced remote navigational
3.2.4 declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? assessment

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive cargo audit by a suitably qualified and experienced Comprehensive cargo audit by a company
3.2.5 company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? representative

Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive engineering audit by a suitable qualified and Comprehensive engineering audit by a
3.2.6 experienced company representative had been completed as declared in the pre-inspection questionnaire? company representative
 Was a report available onboard which confirmed that a comprehensive mooring and anchoring audit by a suitably qualified Comprehensive mooring and anchoring
3.2.7 and experienced company representative had been completed as declared through the pre-inspection questionnaire? audit by a company representative

Had the vessel operator implemented a Behavioural Competency Assessment Programme onboard and was there evidence
available that assessments were being conducted for navigation, cargo, mooring and engineering operations by approved Behavioural Competency Assessment
3.2.8 assessors? Programme
Had the Master and all navigation officers attended a shore-based Bridge Team Management training course within the Shore-based Bridge Team Management
3.3.1 previous five years? training
Had the Master received formal ship handling training prior to promotion or when being assigned to a new type of ship having
3.3.2 significantly different handling characteristics to ships in which they had recently served? Formal ship handling training
Had the Master, deck officers, and cargo/gas engineer where carried, attended a shore-based simulator course covering Cargo operations shore-based simulator
3.3.3 routine and emergency cargo operations within the previous five years? course
Had the Chief Engineer and all engineer officers attended a shore-based engine room management simulator course covering Shore-based engine room management
3.3.4 routine and emergency machinery operations within the previous five years? simulator course

Did all key personnel onboard involved in Dynamically Positioned (DP) operations have appropriate training in accordance with
IMO and International Marine Contractors Association (IMCA) guidelines and local regulations applicable to the area of Training for Dynamically Positioned (DP)
3.3.5 operations? operators
Had the Master, officers and ratings received the required training and familiarisation before being assigned duties related to LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel training
3.3.6 handling LNG or other low-flashpoint fuel? and familiarisation.
Was there an effective system in place to record and monitor the hours of rest for all personnel onboard in compliance with
3.4.1 STCW, MLC or the regulatory requirements applicable to the vessel? Hours of rest, records and monitoring
Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the company policy and procedures for drug and alcohol abuse prevention
3.4.2 and had unannounced drug and alcohol testing taken place onboard in accordance with the policy? Drug and alcohol abuse prevention

Had the company developed an effective familiarisation programme that covered the personal safety and professional
responsibilities of all onboard personnel, including visitors and contractors, and were records available to demonstrate that Familiarisation of crew, visitors and
3.5.1 the familiarisation had been completed as required? contractors
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the ship’s lifesaving and fire extinguishing appliances and, had ongoing
3.5.2 onboard training and instruction taken place to maintain familiarity? Training and instruction LSA and FFA
Had the Master and navigation officers been familiarised with the ECDIS equipment installed on board and were documented Familiarisation with ECDIS equipment
3.5.3 records of this familiarisation available? installed on board.

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the set up and operation of the ECDIS units
fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that the ECDIS had been operated in accordance with company
4.1.1 procedures at all stages of a voyage? ECDIS set up and operation

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for managing and operating the radar/ARPA
units fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that the units had been operated and tested in
4.1.2 accordance with company procedures? Operation and testing of radar/ARPA

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and testing the steering control
systems fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that operation and testing had been carried out in Operating and testing the steering control
4.1.3 accordance with the procedures? systems

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for using the Automatic Identification System
(AIS) fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic checks and tests had been carried out in
4.1.4 accordance with the procedures? Automatic Identification System (AIS)

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the use of the Bridge Navigational Watch
Alarm System (BNWAS) and were records available to demonstrate that it had been operated and tested in accordance with Bridge Navigational Watch Alarm System
4.1.5 the procedure? (BNWAS)

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures governing the management and operation of
the Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) receivers fitted onboard and was the fitted equipment configured, used and
4.1.6 checked in accordance with the procedure? Global Navigation Satellite System(s)

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for operating and managing the echo sounder
and were records maintained to demonstrate that the equipment fitted to the vessel had been tested and operated in
4.1.7 accordance with the company expectations? Echo sounder

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation and testing of the speed and
distance measuring devices fitted to the vessel and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests had been
4.1.8 completed as required by the procedures? Speed and distance measuring devices

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the navigation lights
and shapes, and was there evidence that the navigation lights had been tested to confirm full functionality and correct
4.1.9 visibility? Navigation lights and shapes

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for managing Marine Safety Information
4.1.10 broadcasts by NAVTEX and SafetyNET and were warnings affecting the vessel’s route plotted on the voyage charts? NAVTEX and SafetyNET

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR and
4.1.11 were records available to demonstrate that tests of the equipment had been completed as required? Preserving data from the VDR/S-VDR
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the magnetic and gyro compasses
4.1.12 carried onboard, and were records available to demonstrate their accuracy and reliability? Magnetic and gyro compasses

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation and testing of the VHF/DSC
transceivers fitted to the vessel, and were records available to demonstrate that periodic tests and checks had been
4.1.13 completed in accordance with company expectations? VHF/DSC transceivers
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for testing and using the daylight signalling
4.1.14 lamp? Daylight signalling lamp

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for the use and testing of the sound signalling
equipment fitted to the vessel and were records available to confirm that periodic tests had been completed and the
4.1.15 equipment used in accordance with company expectations? Sound signalling equipment

Were the Master and navigating officers familiar with the company passage planning procedures and had all voyages been
appraised, planned, executed and monitored in accordance with company procedures, industry best practice and both local
4.2.1 and international rules? Passage planning

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company under keel clearance (UKC) policy and procedure, and
were records available to demonstrate that the required calculations had been completed at the appropriate points during
4.2.2 each voyage and the vessel had remained in compliance with the UKC policy? Under keel clearance (UKC) policy
 Had the Master prepared Master's Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforced the
company expectations with regards to navigational requirements including restricted visibility, CPA/BCR and minimum passing
distance from navigational dangers and navigational aids and, if so, had all navigation officers signed to acknowledge their
4.2.3 understanding of the same? Master's Standing Orders and Daily Orders
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company electronic chart management procedures and were
4.2.4 onboard ENCs and RNCs managed, corrected and used appropriately? Electronic chart management.
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company paper chart management procedures and were onboard
4.2.5 paper charts managed, corrected and used appropriately? Paper chart management

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the navigational equipment, main
propulsion, steering gear and thrusters prior to use and prior to critical phases of a passage or operation and, did checklists or Testing navigational equipment, main
4.2.6 logbook entries confirm the required tests had been completed as required? propulsion, steering gear and thrusters

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedure for the carriage and management of nautical
publications and was evidence available to demonstrate that publications had been managed in accordance with the
4.2.7 procedure? Nautical publications

Were the master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures defining the minimum bridge team
composition and engine room operating mode and were records available to demonstrate that recent voyages had been
4.3.1 planned and executed in accordance with company expectations? Minimum bridge team composition

Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedures defining machinery space operating mode and, where
required to be attended, the machinery space team composition during the various stages of a voyage, and were records
4.3.2 available to confirm the machinery space had been operated accordingly? Machinery space team composition
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures for integrating a pilot (or similar role*) into the Integrating a pilot (or similar role) into the
4.3.3 bridge team and were records available to demonstrate that the process had been followed? bridge team
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the company procedures to prevent disruption and distraction on the
4.3.4 bridge, and were these procedures being complied with? Bridge distractions.

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the operation of the Emergency Position Indicating Radio Beacon (EPIRB) and was Emergency Position Indicating Radio
4.4.1 the EPIRB in good order with records available to demonstrate that had it been inspected, tested and maintained as required? Beacon (EPIRB)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the Search and Rescue Transmitters (SARTs), and were the SARTs
4.4.2 in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected and tested as required? Search and Rescue Transmitters (SARTs)

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the survival craft portable two-way VHF
radios and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that had they been inspected and tested as
4.4.3 required? Survival craft portable two-way VHF radios
Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the procedures for sending and receiving distress, urgency and safety Sending and receiving distress, urgency
4.4.4 messages and were suitable instructions posted by the GMDSS equipment? and safety messages

Were the Master and navigation officers familiar with the operation, testing and maintenance of the GMDSS VHF, MF and HF
4.4.5 radio and satellite communications equipment and were records available to demonstrate the equipment was in good order? Operation and testing of GMDSS station.

Were the Master, officers and crew aware of the potential danger of using radio or mobile telephone equipment during cargo Use of radio or mobile telephone
and ballast handling operations and was there a sufficient number of intrinsically safe portable radios for use in operational equipment during cargo and ballast
4.4.6 areas? handling
Was the latest Annual DP Trial report available on board, were the Master and officers familiar with the contents, and had Annual DP Trial report and supporting
4.5.1 they taken part in onboard training and drills involving various DP scenarios? exercises.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of Position Reference Systems (PRS), and was
4.5.2 the equipment in satisfactory condition with sensor offset data readily available to the DPO? DP Position Reference Systems
Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for reporting and recording DP events and incidents, and
4.5.3 were all DP parameters being logged and recorded? DP events and incidents

Was the vessel provided with a comprehensive DP operations manual and were the Master and officers familiar with its
4.5.4 contents, including DP checklists, capability plots, consequence analysis and activity specific operating guidelines (ASOG)? DP operations manual

Were up to date Field Operations Manuals on board for each offshore terminal to which the vessel trades, were the Master
and officers familiar with their content, and were records available of the regular communication checks with terminal
4.5.5 installations as required by Field Specific Operating Guidelines (FSOG)? Field Operations Manuals

Were the Master and officers familiar with the onboard emergency response plans, and were records available to
demonstrate that all mandatory and company defined emergency drills had been completed and documented as required by Records of mandatory and company
5.1.1 company procedures? defined emergency drills

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for the principal fire scenarios for the vessel type, Emergency plans & drills for principal fire
5.1.2 and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the plans in accordance with the company procedures? scenarios
Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s SOPEP or SMPEP, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of Pollution prevention drills required by
5.1.3 the onboard emergency response actions required by the Plan and company procedures? SOPEP or SMPEP

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for enclosed space rescue, and had drills taken place Enclosed space rescue emergency
5.1.4 to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? response drill.
Were the Master and Ship Security Officer (SSO) familiar with the vessel’s Ship Security Plan (SSP), and had drills taken place to Drills required by the Ship Security Plan
5.1.5 test the effectiveness of the measures and procedures specified by the Ship Security Plan? (SSP)

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the procedure for launching the lifeboat(s), and had abandon ship drills Launching the lifeboat(s) and abandon
5.1.6 taken place in accordance with company procedures and the requirements of SOLAS and the Flag Administration? ship drills

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for a cargo vapour or liquid release, Including
potential fire, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance Emergency plan & drills for a cargo vapour
5.1.7 with company procedures? or liquid release, Including potential fire

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for collision, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.8 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency plan & drills for collision

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for grounding, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.9 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? Emergency plan & drills for grounding

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for loss of propulsion, and had drills taken place to Emergency plan & drills for loss of
5.1.10 test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? propulsion
 Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for failure of electrical power, and had drills taken Emergency plan & drills for failure of
5.1.11 place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures? electrical power

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for steering gear failure, and had drills taken place
5.1.12 to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with company procedures. Steering gear failure emergency drill.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plan for emergency towing, including the Emergency
Towing Booklet (ETB), and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in Emergency plan & drills for emergency
5.1.13 accordance with company procedures? towing

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for man overboard, including the
launching and recovering the rescue boat, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency
5.1.14 response plan in accordance with company procedures? Man overboard emergency drill.

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the shipboard emergency response plan for recovery of persons from the
water, and had drills taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plan in accordance with Emergency response plan & drills for
5.1.15 company procedures? recovery of persons from the water

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans for flooding, and had drills taken place to test the
5.1.16 effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures? Emergency plans & drills for flooding

Were the Master and officers familiar with the shipboard emergency plans regarding LNG bunker operations, and had drills Emergency plans and drills for LNG bunker
5.1.17 taken place to test the effectiveness of the shipboard emergency response plans in accordance with company procedures? operations

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures setting out the actions to be taken in the event of a cargo
5.1.18 leak into a double hull tank, and was all required equipment available and in satisfactory condition? Cargo leak into double hull spaces.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the spaces forward of the collision OBO Forward space emergency pumping
5.1.19 bulkhead in the event of flooding and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? arrangements

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency fire pump, and were records
available to demonstrate that the emergency fire pump and its location had been maintained and tested in accordance with
5.2.1 company procedures? Emergency fire pump

Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire dampers, the
means of closing the main inlets and outlets of all ventilation systems and the means of stopping the power ventilation
5.2.2 systems from outside the space served? Fire dampers & ventilation stops

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed fire detection and fire
5.2.3 alarm system, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Fixed fire detection and fire alarm system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed carbon dioxide fire
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with the release Machinery space fixed carbon dioxide fire
5.2.4 procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations? extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s machinery space fixed high-
expansion foam fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order, available for immediate use, and Machinery space fixed high-expansion
5.2.5 with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? foam fire extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s machinery space fixed pressure
water-spraying fire extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use, with Machinery space fixed pressure water-
5.2.6 operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? spraying fire extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire pumps, fire main, fire main
isolating valves and fire hydrants, and was the system and its components in good working order and available for immediate Fire pumps, fire main, fire main isolating
5.2.7 use? valves and fire hydrants

Were the Master, officers and galley staff familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed and portable fire
extinguishing systems provided in the galley, were the systems in good working order and available for immediate use, and Galley fixed and portable fire extinguishing
5.2.8 were galley ranges, exhaust vents, filter cowls free of grease or combustible material? systems & fire prevention

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the water-spray system for cooling, fire
prevention and crew protection on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and
5.2.9 maintained? Water-spray system on deck

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire extinguishing system installed
within enclosed spaces containing cargo handling equipment, and was the equipment in good working order and available for Cargo handling equipment space(s) fixed
5.2.10 immediate use, with the release procedure and operating instructions displayed at the control stations? fire extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed dry chemical powder fire
extinguishing system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for immediate use, with operating Fixed dry chemical powder fire
5.2.11 instructions clearly displayed at the control stations. extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed fire-extinguishing system in the
vessel’s paint locker and any other flammable liquid locker, and was the system in good working order and available for
5.2.12 immediate use? Paint locker fixed fire-extinguishing system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the machinery space fixed water-based or Machinery space fixed water-based or
equivalent local application fire-fighting system, and was the equipment in good working order and readily available for equivalent local application fire-fighting
5.2.13 immediate use, with operating instructions clearly displayed at the control stations? system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose of the cargo, ballast and stripping pump temperature sensing devices,
and was there evidence that alarm activation points had been correctly set and tested in accordance with company Cargo, ballast and stripping pump
5.2.14 procedures and manufacturer's instructions? temperature sensing devices

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s deck foam system, including
portable applicators, and was the system in good working order and available for immediate use, with operating instructions Deck foam system, including portable
5.2.15 displayed at the control station? applicators

5.2.16 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s fire doors? Fire doors

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and use of the vessel’s firefighter’s outfits including the self-
contained breathing apparatus (SCBA), and was the equipment maintained in good condition and ready for immediate use in Firefighter’s outfits including self-
5.3.1 accordance with company procedures? contained breathing apparatus (SCBA)
 Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fire hoses, nozzles and Fire hoses, nozzles and international shore
5.3.2 international shore connection, and was the equipment in good working order and available for immediate use? connection

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s portable fire
extinguishers, and were the extinguishers in good order and readily available for immediate use with operating instructions
5.3.3 clearly marked? Portable fire extinguishers

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and purpose of the Emergency Escape Breathing Devices Emergency Escape Breathing Devices
5.3.4 (EEBDs) carried on board, and were these devices in good order, suitably located and ready for immediate use? (EEBDs)

Were the Master, officers and engine ratings familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s wheeled (mobile) fire
extinguishers, and was the equipment in good order and available for immediate use with operating instructions clearly
5.3.5 marked? Wheeled (mobile) fire extinguishers

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the davit-launched lifeboats, release mechanisms and launching
appliances, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as Davit-launched lifeboats, release
5.4.1 required? mechanisms and launching appliances

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and its launching
appliance, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition with records available to demonstrate that it had been inspected Free-fall lifeboat, its release systems and
5.4.2 and tested in accordance with company procedures? its launching appliance

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the dedicated rescue boat and launching appliance, and were they Dedicated rescue boat and launching
5.4.3 in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been inspected and tested as required? appliance

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the rocket parachute flares and line
throwing appliances and were they in good order, with records available to demonstrate that had they had been inspected as Rocket parachute flares and line throwing
5.4.4 required? appliances

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation of the liferafts, hydrostatic releases and liferaft launching appliances,
where provided, and were they in good order with records available to demonstrate that they had been serviced, inspected Liferafts, hydrostatic releases and liferaft
5.4.5 and tested as required? launching appliances
Were the lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke floats and lifelines, in good order, clearly marked and correctly distributed Lifebuoys, and associated lights, smoke
5.4.6 around the ship? floats and lifelines
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the immersion suits, and were the immersion suits in good order, readily
5.4.7 accessible and their location(s) clearly indicated? Immersion suits
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the lifejackets and personal flotation devices (PFDs) provided on board, and Lifejackets and personal flotation devices
5.4.8 was the equipment in good condition, and properly maintained? (PFDs)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the periodic testing and maintenance of the
5.4.9 emergency lighting system, was there evidence of periodic testing, and was the system in proper operating condition? Emergency lighting.

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company enclosed space entry procedures, and was evidence available
5.5.1 to demonstrate that all enclosed space entries had been made in strict compliance with the procedures? Enclosed space entry procedures

Were the Master, officers and, where directly involved, ratings familiar with the company hot work procedure, and was
5.5.2 evidence available to demonstrate that hot work had been conducted in accordance with the procedure? Hot work procedure

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for working at height, and was there evidence that
risk control measures such as permits to work or documented risk assessments were consistently used whenever work was
5.5.3 undertaken at height? Working at height

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for working over the side, and was there evidence
that risk control measures such as standard work procedures, permits to work or documented risk assessments were
5.5.4 consistently used whenever work was undertaken over the side? Working over the side

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for working on electrical equipment and systems, and
was there evidence that risk control measures such as permits to work and/or documented risk assessments were consistently Working on electrical equipment and
5.5.5 used whenever work was undertaken on electrical equipment and systems? systems

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the control of hazardous energy, and was evidence
available, through documented risk assessment or permits, that hazardous energy sources were routinely identified and
5.5.6 isolated before working on, or in, machinery, systems or spaces where hazardous energy could be present? Control of hazardous energy

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing, maintenance and calibration of the vessel’s
portable and personal gas measurement instruments, and was the equipment on board sufficient, in good working order, Portable and personal gas measurement
5.6.1 regularly tested and periodically calibrated? instruments

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for testing the atmosphere in double-hull and
double bottom spaces for flammable gas, and were records available to confirm that appropriate measurements had been Testing the atmosphere in double-hull and
5.6.2 taken using the equipment fitted to, or provided on, the vessel? double bottom spaces for flammable gas

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection systems Fixed gas detection systems required by
5.6.3 required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated? the IGC Code

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the vessel’s fixed gas detection system
required by the IGF Code, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly maintained and calibrated in accordance Fixed gas detection system required by
5.6.4 with company procedures and manufacturer’s instructions? the IGF Code

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the cargo pump room fixed gas detection
system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and alarm activation points set in accordance with Cargo pump room fixed gas detection
5.6.5 company procedures and manufacturer's instructions? system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the operation and maintenance of the oxygen sensors and associated alarms fitted
in the space, or spaces, containing the inert gas system, and was the equipment fully operational with sensors calibrated and
5.6.6 alarm activation points set in accordance with company procedures and manufacturer's instructions? Oxygen sensors in inert gas system spaces.

Had all onboard incidents been reported and investigated in accordance with company procedures, and was an incident Incident investigation reports for defined
5.7.1 investigation report or a summarised lessons learned bulletin available for each incident at or above a defined threshold? incidents

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company incident and near-miss reporting procedure and was evidence
available to demonstrate that incidents and near-misses had been investigated and closed out in accordance with the Incident and near-miss reporting
5.7.2 company procedure? procedure
 Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for holding and documenting shipboard safety
meetings and was evidence available that safety concerns raised at the meetings were acknowledged and addressed by shore
5.7.3 management? Shipboard safety meetings

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company work planning procedures and were records available to
5.7.4 demonstrate that onboard work planning meetings had been conducted and documented in accordance with the procedures? Work planning procedure
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the purpose and implementation of the company Stop Work Authority
5.7.5 policy and procedure? Stop Work Authority

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for risk assessment, as appropriate to their duties, Risk assessments for new, non-routine,
5.7.6 and was there evidence of the development and review of risk assessments in accordance with the procedures? unplanned or specified tasks
Were Safety Data Sheets (SDS) available on board for all cargo, bunkers, chemicals, paints and other products being handled,
5.7.7 and were crew members familiar with their use? Safety Data Sheets.

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS) procedure and was there
evidence that SIMOPS were considered during work planning and the required controls implemented for the duration of such Simultaneous Operations (SIMOPS)
5.7.8 operations? procedure
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the main deck areas, and had Safety inspection of the main deck and
5.8.1 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? mooring areas.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the machinery spaces, and had
5.8.2 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Safety inspection of the machinery space.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the cargo pumproom, and had
5.8.3 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Safety inspections of the cargo pumproom
Were the Master and officers familiar with the procedure for safety inspections of the cargo machinery rooms, and had
5.8.4 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Cargo machinery rooms safety inspections
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the forecastle, and had
5.8.5 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? Safety inspection of the forecastle spaces

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the accommodation, and had Safety inspections of the accommodation
5.8.6 inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? spaces

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for safety inspections of the ballast and/or bunker Ballast and/or bunker pumproom safety
5.8.7 pumproom, and had inspections been effective in identifying hazards to health, safety and the environment? inspection

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company lifting and rigging procedures, and was evidence available to
demonstrate that each item of lifting and rigging equipment had been maintained, inspected and tested in accordance with Lifting and rigging equipment procedures,
5.9.1 the procedure? maintenance and inspection

Where the vessel was fitted with a single cargo hose handling crane, was a risk assessment available which identified the
minimum spare parts that must be carried onboard to ensure continued operation in the event of a single component failure, Spare parts for a single cargo hose
5.9.2 and were the identified spare parts available onboard? handling crane.

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the pilot boarding
5.10.1 arrangements, and was the equipment provided in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with industry best practice? Pilot boarding arrangements

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for rigging the accommodation ladders,
and were the accommodation ladders in good order and used in accordance with the company procedure and manufacturer’s
5.10.2 instructions? Accommodation ladders

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedure for providing safe access to the vessel while
alongside a terminal/berth, and was safe access provided by the ship’s portable gangway, the vessel’s accommodation ladder Safe access to the vessel while alongside a
5.10.3 or a shore gangway? terminal/berth

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company personnel transfer by crane procedure, and where a personnel
transfer basket (PTB) and accessories were provided, were these in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with
5.10.4 company procedures and manufacturer’s recommendations? Personnel transfer by crane
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had these procedures
5.10.5 been complied with? Helicopter operations
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for helicopter/ship operations, and had the crew involved
5.10.6 received appropriate training? Helicopter facilities

Were the Master, officers and crew familiar with the escape routes from the machinery spaces, pump rooms, compressor
rooms, accommodation spaces and, when in port, from the vessel, and were these routes clearly marked, unobstructed and
5.10.7 well illuminated? Escape routes

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the management of samples of bunker fuel oil
5.11.1 and Annex I and/or Annex II cargoes as applicable, and were samples being properly stored and eventually disposed of? Cargo and bunker sample management.

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures that addressed the use of respiratory protective
5.12.1 equipment during cargo operations, and did the procedures prohibit the use of filter type respirators for this purpose? Respiratory protective equipment
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the location and operation of the decontamination showers and eyewash Decontamination showers and eyewash
5.12.2 stations on deck, and were these facilities suitably marked, easily accessible and ready for use? stations.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Cargo Record Book, and did the entries
contained in the Cargo Record Book accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by MARPOL
6.1.1 Annex II? Cargo Record Book

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Part II, and did the
entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part II accurately record the cargo related operations required to be documented by
6.1.2 MARPOL Annex I? Oil Record Book Part II

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Oil Record Book Part I, and
did the entries contained in the Oil Record Book Part I accurately record the machinery space operations required to be
6.1.3 documented by MARPOL Annex I? Oil Record Book Part I

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for maintaining the Garbage Record Book in accordance
with the Garbage Management Plan, and did the entries contained in the Garbage Record Book accurately record the garbage
6.1.4 management activities required to be documented by MARPOL Annex V? Garbage Record Book

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for maintaining the Ozone-depleting Substances
Record Book, and did the entries contained in the Ozone-depleting Substances Record Book accurately record the operations
6.1.5 and emissions required to be documented by MARPOL Annex VI? Ozone Depleting Substances Record Book
 Were the documents and records required by MARPOL Annex VI Regulation 13 for the control of NOx and associated MARPOL Annex VI NOx Compliance and
6.1.6 emissions in good order? Record Keeping.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the arrangements to drain the cargo pumproom bilges in the event of flooding or Flooding or accidental leakage of cargo
6.2.1 accidental leakage, and were these arrangements in good order? pumproom bilges

Were cargo system overboard and sea suction valves checked and verified as closed and secured prior to commencement of Cargo system overboard and sea suction
6.2.2 cargo transfer, and where provided, were sea valve-testing arrangements in order and regularly monitored for leakage? valves

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for inspections and pressure tests of the bunker oil (HFO
6.2.3 and MDO) pipeline system, and had the tests been performed and the results suitably recorded? Bunker pipeline system pressure testing

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation of the ballast water management
system (BWMS), and was the equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedures and Ballast water management system
6.3.1 manufacturer’s instructions? (BWMS)

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures for the removal of small quantities of oil or
chemical spilled and contained on deck, and was suitable response equipment available, in satisfactory condition and Main deck oil or chemical spill clean up
6.4.1 effectively deployed? equipment.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the disposal of accumulations of water contaminated Disposal of oily water in the forecastle and
6.4.2 with oil and/or marine pollutants in the forecastle and other internal spaces, and had the procedures been implemented? other internal spaces
Were the Master and officers familiar with the emergency arrangements to pump out the machinery space bilges in the event Emergency arrangements to pump out the
6.5.1 of flooding, and were these arrangements prominently marked and in good order? machinery space bilges

Were the engineer officers familiar with the company procedure for the safe use of the incinerator, and was the incinerator in
6.5.2 satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedure and in compliance with MARPOL? Incinerator operation.

Were the Master and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil filtering equipment, and
was the oil filtering equipment in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the company procedure, manufacturer’s
6.6.1 instructions and MARPOL Annex I? Oil filtering equipment.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the oil discharge monitoring and control
system, and was the oil discharge monitoring and control system in satisfactory condition and used in accordance with the Oil discharge monitoring and control
6.6.2 company procedures, manufacturer’s instructions and MARPOL Annex I? system (ODME)
Was security threat and risk assessment an integral part of voyage planning, and did the passage plan contain security related Security threat and risk assessment during
7.1.1 information for each leg of the voyage? passage planning.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for hardening the vessel when entering areas of increased
7.2.1 security risk, and was there a Vessel Hardening Plan (VHP) available? Vessel hardening.
Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the company procedures to control access to the vessel in port and to
7.2.2 ensure the safety of visitors, and were these procedures effectively implemented? Controlling access to the vessel
Were the Master and officers familiar with regional maritime security reporting requirements and operation of the ship Ship security reporting and
7.3.1 security alert system (SSAS) and had this equipment been regularly tested? communications
Did the Ship Security Officer (SSO) have a valid Certificate of Proficiency and a full understanding of their role, and were ship
7.4.1 security records of port calls being maintained as required by SOLAS? Ship Security Officer (SSO).
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for cyber security risk management, and had these
7.5.1 procedures been fully implemented? Cyber security risk management.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of the inert gas system, and had the inert gas
system been used in accordance with ISGOTT guidance, with cargo tanks maintained in an inert condition at all times, except
8.1.1 when it was necessary to be gas-free for entry? Inert gas system usage on oil tankers.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures and international regulations for the planning,
preparation, conduct and documentation of crude oil washing operations (COW), and was the COW system in satisfactory
8.1.2 condition and used in accordance with the company procedures for each COW operation? Crude Oil Washing operations (COW)
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the isolation of individual cargo tanks from the
8.1.3 common venting system in accordance with SOLAS, and were these procedures being followed? Cargo tank isolation from venting system.
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for planning and documenting cargo tank cleaning
8.1.4 operations after the carriage of volatile products, and had these procedures been followed? Oil cargo tank cleaning procedures.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the inert gas system, and had the
8.2.1 inert gas system been used in accordance with these procedures, industry guidance, and SOLAS and IBC regulations? Chemical tanker inert gas system usage.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes, and had
8.2.2 these procedures been followed? Carriage of inhibited chemical cargoes.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the information contained in the Procedures and Arrangements Manual, Certificate
of Fitness for the Carriage of Noxious Liquid Substances in Bulk, the IBC Code and the latest MEPC.2/Circular, and was this
8.2.3 information readily available to the officers engaged in cargo planning and operations? Procedures and Arrangements Manual.

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for planning and documenting cargo tank cleaning
8.2.4 operations after the carriage of volatile and/or toxic products, and had these procedures been followed? Chemical tank cleaning procedures.
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatible cargoes
8.2.5 during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed? Chemical cargo compatibility charts.
Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IBC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitable
8.2.6 respiratory and eye protection? Escape sets required by IBC Code.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety equipment required by the IBC Safety equipment required by the IBC
8.2.7 Code, including SCBAs, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition ready for immediate use? Code.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required by the IBC Protective equipment required by the IBC
8.2.8 Code, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition and suitable for the products being handled? Code.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the inert gas generator, and had the system
8.3.1 been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Inert gas generator

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the nitrogen generator inert gas system, and
8.3.2 had the system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Nitrogen generator inert gas system
 Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the flue gas inert gas system, and had the
8.3.3 system been operated and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions and company procedures? Flue gas inert gas system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and setting of the cargo tank
8.3.4 high-level and high-high-level alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set? Cargo tank high level and overfill alarms.

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for dipping, ullaging and sampling Gauging and sampling static accumulator
8.3.5 flammable static accumulator cargoes in non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? cargo in non-inerted tanks.
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for loading flammable static accumulator cargoes Loading static accumulator cargo into non-
8.3.6 into non-inerted tanks, and were these procedures being followed? inerted tanks.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and calibration of the inert gas system fixed oxygen
analyser, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s
8.3.7 instructions and company procedures? IGS oxygen analyser

Were the Master, officers and ratings familiar with the cargo system Emergency Shutdown (ESD) system, where fitted, and/or
the cargo pump emergency stop controls, and was there evidence that the systems and equipment had been tested in Oil and Chemical Tanker ESD and/or cargo
8.3.8 accordance with company procedures? pump emergency stop controls.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and testing of cargo, vapour and inert Pressure testing and inspection of cargo,
8.3.9 gas pipelines, and were records available for these activities? inert gas and vapour pipelines.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, testing and operation of the vapour
8.3.10 collection system, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition? Vapour collection system.
Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedures for cargo tank washing after the Oil and chemical tank cleaning in non-inert
8.3.11 carriage of volatile products in a non-inert atmosphere, and had these procedures been followed? tanks.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use of portable cargo Portable ullage/temperature/interface
ullage/temperature/interface (UTI) measurement and sampling equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition (UTI) measurement and sampling
8.3.12 and used in accordance with the company procedures? equipment.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the primary and secondary cargo
8.3.13 tank venting systems in accordance with SOLAS, and were these systems correctly set? Secondary venting systems.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
8.3.14 the cargo tank venting systems, and were the systems in satisfactory condition? Cargo tank venting systems.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring leakage into the cofferdams of deepwell
8.3.15 pumps, and had regular purging of the cofferdams taken place to identify any excessive leakage? Deepwell pump cofferdam purging.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the non-return devices
8.3.16 installed in the inert gas system, and were these devices in satisfactory condition? Inert gas system non-return devices

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold reducers,
8.3.17 spool pieces and other portable pipework, and were these items in satisfactory condition and properly fitted when in use? Manifold reducers and spool pieces.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation, testing and maintenance of the pressure/vacuum-breaking Inert gas system pressure/vacuum-
8.3.18 (P/V) device(s) installed in the inert gas main, and was this device(s) in satisfactory condition? breaking (P/V) device(s)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose, operation and testing of the indicators and alarms in the inert gas
system, and had the equipment been operated, maintained and calibrated in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions Indicators and alarms for the inert gas
8.3.19 and company procedures? system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the connections and interconnections to the inert gas
system for routine and emergency inert gas operations, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition and clearly Connections and interconnections to/with
8.3.20 identified as to their purpose? the inert gas system piping
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedure for cargo heating, and was the cargo heating system in
8.3.21 satisfactory condition and tested and used in accordance with the company procedure? Cargo heating system
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing on-board doping operations, and had these
8.3.22 procedures been complied with? Cargo doping and additives.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and calibration of the cargo Cargo tank temperature monitoring
8.3.23 temperature monitoring equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? systems.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections at the cargo
8.3.24 manifolds, and were the manifold arrangements in satisfactory condition? Cargo manifold arrangements.
Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for receiving nitrogen from shore for operations
8.3.25 such as inerting, purging or padding cargo tank, or for clearing cargo lines? Receiving nitrogen from shore
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures that addressed the carriage of inhibited cargoes, and had
8.4.1 these procedures been followed? Carriage of inhibited cargoes.
8.4.2 Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out cargo sampling operations? Cargo sampling

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for identifying and segregating incompatible cargoes and Segregating incompatible cargoes and
8.4.3 refrigerants during cargo stowage planning, and had these procedures been followed? refrigerants
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe carriage of propylene oxide (PO), ethylene Carriage of propylene oxide (PO) and/or
8.4.4 oxide (EO) and PO-EO mixtures? ethylene oxide (EO)
Were there sufficient escape sets as required by the IGC Code for everyone on board, and did the sets provide suitable
8.4.5 respiratory and eye protection? Escape sets as required by the IGC Code
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the cargo tank
8.4.6 insulation, and was the insulation reported to be in good condition? Cargo tank insulation
Were the vent outlets from the cargo containment system fitted with the correct protection screen or flame screen required Vent outlet protection screens or flame
8.4.7 for the cargo being carried, and were the screens in satisfactory condition? screens
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, testing and calibration of the custody Custody transfer measurement system
8.5.1 transfer measurement system (CTMS), and was the system in satisfactory condition? (CTMS)
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of
8.5.2 the Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)? Gas Combustion Unit (GCU)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance and testing of the safety
8.5.3 arrangements for the LNG gas fuel supply system, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition? LNG gas fuel supply system

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for protecting the hull structure from low temperature Cold spots and cofferdam temperature
8.5.4 exposure, and was temperature monitoring and cofferdam heating equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition? monitoring and heating equipment.
 Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the maintenance, testing and setting of the
8.6.1 independent cargo tank high-level and overfill alarms, and were these alarm systems fully operational and properly set? Cargo tank overfill alarms

Were the Master, officers, and ratings involved with cargo operations, familiar with the functions of the vessel’s cargo transfer
Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and Cargo transfer Emergency Shut Down
8.6.2 maintained? (ESD)
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and setting of the
8.6.3 cargo tank relief valves? Cargo tank relief valves
Was a ship specific Cargo System Operation Manual provided on board, and were the Master and officers familiar with its
8.6.4 content? Cargo System Operation Manual

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for monitoring the integrity of the containment system
and maintaining the atmosphere in the interbarrier spaces and/or hold spaces in a safe condition, and had records been Maintaining the atmosphere in the
8.6.5 maintained? interbarrier spaces and/or hold spaces
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the management and operation of the cargo alarm
8.6.6 systems, and had these procedures been followed? Cargo system alarm management

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
8.6.7 the vessel’s inert gas system and its associated equipment, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Inert gas system
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for managing cargo and vapour connections at the cargo
8.6.8 manifolds, and were the manifold arrangements in satisfactory condition? Gas vessel cargo manifolds

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the use, inspection and testing of manifold reducers, Manifold reducers, spool pieces and other
8.6.9 spool pieces and other portable pipework, and were these items in satisfactory condition and properly fitted when in use? portable pipework
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for carrying out emergency discharge operations, and was
8.6.10 any required additional equipment in satisfactory condition? Emergency discharge operations

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection and maintenance of cargo and Cargo and vapour pipeline insulation and
8.6.11 vapour pipeline insulation and expansion arrangements, and were these arrangements in satisfactory condition? expansion arrangements
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures relating to the safety, rescue and recovery equipment, IGC safety, rescue and recovery
8.6.12 including SCBAs, required by the IGC Code, and was the equipment ready for immediate use? equipment

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures addressing the protective equipment required by the IGC Protective equipment required by the IGC
8.6.13 Code, and was this equipment in satisfactory condition and suitable for the products being handled? Code
Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of the
8.6.14 reliquefaction plant, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Reliquefaction plant
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the safe operation and maintenance of the cargo
8.6.15 heaters, vaporisers and condensers, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Cargo heaters, vaporisers and condensers
Were the Master and officers familiar with the filling limits (FL) and loading limits (LL) for the cargo tanks, and was this
8.6.16 information readily available in the cargo control room or position? Filling Limits (FL) and Loading Limits (LL)
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
8.6.17 the vent mast fire suppression system, and was the system in satisfactory condition? Vent mast fire suppression system
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for detecting water leakage into hold or insulation spaces Water or liquid cargo leakage into a hold
8.6.18 and for dealing with any water or liquid cargo that may have accumulated in these spaces? or insulation space

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation of the submerged motor electric cargo
8.6.19 pumps and the testing of their associated safety devices and alarms, and had these procedures been followed? Submerged motor electric cargo pumps
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the inspection, maintenance, testing and setting of the Liquid line, hold, insulation and inter-
8.6.20 liquid line, hold, insulation and inter-barrier space relief valves? barrier space relief valves

Were the Master and Officers familiar with the company procedures that gave guidance on cargo tank environmental control
during inerting, gas freeing and gassing up operations, thermal load hazards during tank cool-down, and the minimum cargo Inerting, gas freeing and gassing up
8.6.21 temperature? operations
Were the Master and officers familiar with the purpose and operation of the vessel’s Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems,
8.7.1 and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? BLS Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures, including appropriate arrival checklists, detailing the
necessary checks and actions to be carried out when approaching an offshore terminal prior to DP and/or bow loading Checks when approaching an offshore
8.7.2 operations, and had these procedures been complied with? terminal.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the equipment for control and monitoring of the Bow Loading System (BLS), and Control and monitoring of the Bow
8.7.3 was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? Loading System (BLS)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of Bow Loading System (BLS) operation,
8.7.4 the Bow Loading System (BLS), including alarms and indicators, and was the BLS area well maintained and free from oil. inspection, testing and maintenance.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the deluge system in the bow loading Deluge system in the bow loading system
8.7.5 system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? (BLS) area

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the fixed foam fire extinguishing system in
the bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order and regularly inspected, tested and Fixed foam fire extinguishing system in the
8.7.6 maintained? bow loading system (BLS) area

8.7.7 Are all items of DP equipment in satisfactory condition and are they included in the Planned Maintenance System (PMS)? DP Equipment condition and maintenance
Were the Master and officers familiar with the vessel’s DP FMEA, was the latest version available on board, and were any
8.7.8 modifications to the DP system included? DP FMEA

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the gas and fire detection systems in the Gas and fire detection systems in the bow
8.7.9 bow loading system (BLS) area, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly tested, maintained and calibrated? loading system (BLS) area
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, maintenance and testing of
8.8.1 the cargo hold hatch-covers, and were the hatch covers in satisfactory condition? Cargo hold hatch covers
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for changing cargo modes, including ship-specific
8.8.2 checklists, and were there records to show that these procedures had been followed? Changing between wet and dry cargoes
 Were the Master and all officers directly involved in cargo transfer operations familiar with the company procedure for
planning cargo and ballast transfers, and were records available to demonstrate that cargo operations had been planned in Cargo and ballast transfer planning and
8.99.1 accordance with the company procedure and conducted in accordance with the agreed plan? execution.

Were the Master and all officers with a direct responsibility for cargo, tank cleaning or ballast operations familiar with the
requirements of the ISGOTT Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL) and, were appropriate sections of the SSSCL in use with all
8.99.2 applicable provisions and agreements maintained throughout? Ship/Shore Safety Checklist (SSSCL)

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures which provided guidance on the level of supervision and
support for cargo / port operations, and were operations supervised and supported by an appropriate team in accordance
8.99.3 with the company procedures? Cargo operations team composition.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for checking and testing cargo and ballast system valves,
8.99.4 and were the valves and the remote control system in satisfactory condition? Cargo and ballast valve testing.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, maintenance, testing, calibration and
8.99.5 comparison of the fixed cargo tank level gauging system, and was the system in satisfactory condition and fully operational? Fixed cargo tank level gauging system.

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedure and manufacturer’s instructions for the periodic
testing of the stability and loading instrument(s), and were records maintained to confirm that tests had been completed in
8.99.6 accordance with the procedure? Stability and loading instrument(s)

Where the vessel was subject to loading restrictions and/or intact stability concerns at any phase of a voyage or cargo
operation, had the company developed procedures to manage these restrictions and/or concerns, and were the Master and
8.99.7 cargo officers familiar with the company procedures? Loading limitations
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the selection, inspection, testing and storage of cargo
8.99.8 transfer hoses, and were the hoses in satisfactory condition? Cargo Transfer hoses.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for periodically verifying the accuracy of cargo and
ballast system controls and indicators, and were legible and up-to-date pipeline and/or mimic diagrams available at the cargo Cargo and ballast system controls,
8.99.9 control location(s) and in the pumproom(s) as applicable? indicators, mimics and displays.

Were the Master and officers a familiar with the company procedures for the inspection and maintenance of the bonding
arrangements for independent cargo tanks, process plant and cargo pipelines and, were these arrangements in satisfactory
8.99.10 condition? Cargo system bonding arrangements.

Was there a procedure in place to complete an independent check of the entire cargo liquid, vapour and venting pipeline
system prior to commencement of cargo operations to ensure that valves, vacuum breakers, sampling connections, drains and Independent verification of cargo piping
8.99.11 unused connections or interconnections were correctly set, and blanked or capped, where appropriate? systems line up.

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for the testing and correct operation of the mooring
winch brakes, and were records available to demonstrate that brakes had been tested periodically, after maintenance or when Testing and correct operation of the
9.1.1 there was evidence of premature brake slippage? mooring winch brakes
Was the vessel satisfactorily moored in accordance with both the terminal mooring plan and the mooring configurations
9.1.2 permitted by the vessel’s Mooring System Management Plan? Was the vessel satisfactorily moored

Were the Master, deck officers, and ratings involved with mooring operations, familiar with the content of the Line
Management Plan and was the plan maintained in accordance with company instructions with mooring line, mooring tail and Line Management Plan (LMP)
9.1.3 joining shackle certificates available for each item included within the Line Management Plan? implementation.

9.1.4 Did all mooring lines, mooring tails and joining shackles, including those carried as spares, meet industry guidelines? Mooring lines, tails and mooring shackles.
Were the Master and all officers familiar with the vessel specific emergency towing procedure, and was the emergency towing Emergency towing procedure and
9.2.1 equipment, where fitted, in satisfactory condition and ready for immediate use? equipment

Were the Master and deck officers familiar with the company procedures for anchoring operations, and were records available
9.3.1 to confirm that recent anchoring operations had been conducted in compliance with company expectations? Anchoring operations

Were the Master, deck officers and deck ratings familiar with the company procedure that defined mooring team supervision
and composition for the various mooring and anchoring operations likely to be undertaken, and was evidence available that Mooring team supervision and
9.4.1 each mooring work space had been supervised and manned in accordance with company expectations? composition

Were the deck officers and ratings involved with mooring operations familiar with the safe operation of the mooring winches Dangers of working with and around
9.4.2 and the dangers of working with and around mooring lines during mooring operations and while under tension? mooring lines
Were the appropriate industry checklists used during STS operations, and were comprehensive records of these operations
9.5.1 maintained? STS operations checklists

Where the vessel was involved in an “at sea” STS operation, was an accurate Joint Plan of Operation available onboard, were
the Master and deck officers familiar with its content, and were operations being conducted in accordance with its
9.5.2 requirements? STS Joint Plan of Operation (JPO)
9.5.3 Were the Master, officers and deck ratings familiar with the vessel’s STS Operations Plan? STS Operations Plan
Vapour hose securing arrangement for
9.6.1 Were the vapour collection system manifold arrangements suitable for hose handling at buoy moorings? buoy moorings.
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for mooring at an SPM or F(P)SO and were the fittings
9.6.2 required accurately described in the HVPQ? SPM mooring arrangements.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection, testing and maintenance of
9.7.1 the bow mooring system for offshore terminals, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Shuttle tanker bow mooring system

Had the Chief Engineer prepared Standing Orders, supplemented by Daily Orders, which emphasised and reinforced the
company expectations with regards to engine room management and, if so, had all engineer officers signed to acknowledge
10.1.1 their understanding of the same? Chief Engineer's standing and daily orders

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for testing main propulsion, steering
gear, thrusters and power generation plant prior to use and at critical points during a voyage or operation, and were checklists Testing main propulsion, steering gear,
10.1.2 and log book entries completed as required? thrusters & power generation plant

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic rounds and monitoring of the
machinery space, and were log book entries and checklists available to confirm that the rounds had been completed as Periodic rounds of machinery space for
10.1.3 required? non-UMS vessels

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with company procedures for periodic machinery space rounds and Periodic machinery space rounds during
monitoring of the machinery space during both manned and unmanned (UMS) periods, and were log book entries and both manned and unmanned (UMS)
10.1.4 checklists available to confirm that the inspections had been completed as required? periods
 Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation, inspection and testing of the means provided to
10.1.5 control propulsion machinery and related auxiliary systems locally in the event of failure of a remote-control system? Local control of propulsion machinery
Were the officers familiar with the starting procedure for the emergency generator and were records available to demonstrate
10.2.1 that the emergency generator had been tested according to company procedures? Emergency generator

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the regular inspection, maintenance
10.2.2 and testing of the ship’s emergency batteries, and were the batteries fully charged and in satisfactory condition? Battery emergency source of power.

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, calibration and
maintenance of the exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS), and were required safety and regulatory measures being complied
10.2.3 with? Exhaust gas cleaning system (EGCS)

10.2.4 Were seawater pipelines, sea chests and seawater pumps in satisfactory condition and free of temporary repairs? seawater pipelines

Were the officers familiar with the company procedure for testing the bilge monitoring devices within their area of
responsibility, and were records available to demonstrate that the bilge monitoring devices and associated alarms had been
10.2.5 tested in accordance with the company procedure? Bilge monitoring devices

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and testing Emergency compressed air machinery
10.2.6 of the emergency air compressor and emergency air reservoir, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? starting system.
10.3.1 Was suitable deck insulation provided to the front and rear of electrical switchboards, and was it in good order? Switchboard deck insulation.

Were the engineer officers familiar with the purpose and setting of the insulation monitoring devices provided on the primary Electrical distribution system switchboard
10.3.2 and secondary distribution systems, and were the distribution switchboards free of significant earth faults? earth monitoring.
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for safe entry into the machinery Entry into the machinery space during
10.3.3 space(s) during UMS operation, including the operation and testing of the dead man alarm, if fitted? UMS.
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the engineers’ alarm, and was the alarm in good
10.3.4 order, tested regularly and the results recorded? Engineers' alarm.
Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the operation of the machinery alarm, and was the alarm in good
10.3.5 order, tested regularly and the results recorded? Machinery alarm
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for the operation, inspection and regular testing of
10.3.6 watertight doors, and were the watertight doors in satisfactory condition? Watertight doors.
Was gas welding and cutting equipment in good order, and spare oxygen and acetylene cylinders stored apart in a well-
10.3.7 ventilated location outside of the accommodation and engine room? Gas welding and cutting equipment.
Were engineer officers and ratings familiar with the safety precautions for the use of electric welding equipment, were these
10.3.8 safety precautions posted, and was the equipment in satisfactory condition? Electric welding equipment.

Were the responsible vessel staff familiar with the company procedure for managing and using the planned maintenance
system, and was the system updated with an accurate record of onboard maintenance and spare parts in accordance with the
10.4.1 procedure? Planned maintenance system (PMS)
Did the vessel operator subscribe to a lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program and was a procedure in place to act on the
10.4.2 results and trends identified by the analysis? Lube oil and hydraulic oil analysis program

Were the Master, Chief Engineer, officers, and ratings involved in bunkering operations, familiar with the company bunkering
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations had been planned and conducted in
10.5.1 accordance with the company procedure? Conventional bunkering operations

Were the Chief Engineer and engineer officers familiar with the company procedures for bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis,
and were records available to demonstrate that samples had been taken and retained or analysed in accordance with the
10.5.2 procedure? Bunker fuel oil sampling and analysis

Were the Chief Engineer and senior engineer officers familiar with the company and vessel specific fuel changeover
procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that fuel grade changeovers had been completed in compliance with
10.5.3 the procedures and MARPOL regulations? Fuel change over procedures

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose and operation of the LNG fuel tank water-spray system for
cooling and fire prevention on deck, and was the equipment in good working order, regularly inspected, tested and
10.6.1 maintained? LNG fuel tank water-spray system

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings, involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the functions of
the vessel’s LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering Emergency Shut Down (ESD) systems, and was the equipment in
10.6.2 good working order, regularly inspected, tested and maintained? LNG gas fuel bunkering ESD system

Were the Chief Engineer, and those officers and ratings involved in LNG bunkering operations, familiar with the company LNG
(or other low-flashpoint fuel) bunkering procedures, and were records available to demonstrate that bunker operations had LNG (or other low-flashpoint fuel)
10.6.3 been planned and conducted in accordance with the company procedures? bunkering procedures.
LNG fuel bunkering control station and
10.6.4 Were the safety measures at the bunkering control station and bunkering manifold area in satisfactory condition? manifold.

Were the Master and officers familiar with the location, purpose, testing and operation of the vessel’s remote controls for fuel
and lube oil valves, emergency fuel and lube oil pump shut-offs and oil tank quick closing valves, and were the systems in good Remote controls for fuel and lube oil
10.7.1 working order? system valves

Were the Master and officers familiar with the measures to prevent fire in the machinery spaces caused by flammable liquid Fire prevention in machinery spaces - hot
10.7.2 spraying onto a hot surface and, were the protective measures provided regularly inspected and properly maintained? surfaces and oil spray
Were the main engine crankcase oil mist detectors, engine bearing temperature monitors or equivalent devices and
10.7.3 associated alarms in good order? Main engine crank case monitoring.
Where hydraulic power packs were located within the main engine compartment, were fire protection measures provided, Hydraulic power packs fire protection
10.7.4 and if so, where they in satisfactory condition? measures.
Was photograph no.1, bow area from dead ahead, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.1 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Bow area from dead ahead
Was photograph no.2, hull forward end starboard side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.2 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Hull forward end starboard side
Was photograph no.3, hull forward end port side representative, of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.3 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Hull forward end port side
Was photograph no.4, hull aft end starboard side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.4 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Hull aft end starboard side
Was photograph no.5, hull aft end port side, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection
11.1.5 and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Hull aft end port side
 Was photograph no.6, transom from right astern, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.6 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Transom from right astern
Was photograph no.7, forecastle port side looking towards fairleads, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Forecastle port side looking towards
11.1.7 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? fairleads
Was photograph no.8, forecastle starboard side looking towards fairleads, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Forecastle starboard side looking towards
11.1.8 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? fairleads
Was photograph no.9, port or starboard windlass, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.9 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Port or starboard windlass

Was photograph no.10, forward main deck showing condition of deck (and external framing), representative of the condition Forward main deck showing condition of
11.1.10 as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? deck (and external framing)
Was photograph no.11, Forward main deck showing condition of piperack, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Forward main deck showing condition of
11.1.11 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Piperack
Was photograph no.12, one mooring winch including the brake setting arrangement, representative of the condition as seen One mooring winch including the brake
11.1.12 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? setting arrangement
Was photograph no.13, one hose crane with an overall view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.13 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? One hose crane with an overall view
Was photograph no.14, one hose crane hoisting winch, stowed wire and limit switches, representative of the condition as seen One hose crane hoisting winch, stowed
11.1.14 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? wire and limit switches
Was photograph no.15, starboard manifold looking from aft to forward, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Starboard manifold looking from aft to
11.1.15 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? forward
Was photograph no.16, starboard manifold looking forward to aft representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time
11.1.16 of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Starboard manifold looking forward to aft
Was photograph no.17, aft main deck showing condition of deck (and external framing), representative of the condition as Aft main deck showing condition of deck
11.1.17 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? (and external framing)
Was photograph no.18, aft main deck showing condition of Piperack, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Aft main deck showing condition of
11.1.18 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Piperack
Was photograph no.19, poop deck looking from midships to starboard including fairleads, representative of the condition as Poop deck looking from midships to
11.1.19 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? starboard including fairleads
Was photograph no.20, aft emergency towing equipment storage arrangement, representative of the condition as seen Aft emergency towing equipment storage
11.1.20 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? arrangement
Was photograph no.21, aft emergency towing equipment deployment system, representative of the condition as seen Aft emergency towing equipment
11.1.21 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? deployment system
Was photograph no.22, lifeboat and davit, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and,
11.1.22 if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Lifeboat and davit
Was photograph no.23, the emergency generator or accumulator batteries, representative of the condition as seen onboard at The emergency generator or accumulator
11.1.23 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? batteries
Was photograph no.24, engine room general view showing top of main engine, representative of the condition as seen Engine room general view showing top of
11.1.24 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? main engine
Was photograph no.25, one generator engine, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection
11.1.25 and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? One generator engine
Was photograph no.26, the oil filtering equipment, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.26 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? The oil filtering equipment
Was photograph no.27, the incinerator, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if
11.1.27 so, was it free of any areas for concern? The incinerator
Was photograph no.28, one boiler from the front, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.28 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? One boiler from the front
Was photograph no.29, one boiler from the top showing control equipment, representative of the condition as seen onboard One boiler from the top showing control
11.1.29 at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? equipment
Was photograph no.30, purifier room general view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.30 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Purifier room general view
Was photograph no.31, main engine side showing local control station, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the Main engine side showing local control
11.1.31 time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? station
Was photograph no.32, steering gear room general view showing access, representative of the condition as seen onboard at Steering gear room general view showing
11.1.32 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? access
Was photograph no.33, main steering gear, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and,
11.1.33 if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Main steering gear
Was photograph no.40, IG system pressure/vacuum-breaking (P/V) device, representative of the condition as seen onboard at IG system pressure/vacuum-breaking
11.1.40 the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? (P/V) device

IG system first non-return device (deck

Was photograph no.41, IG system first non-return device (deck seal or double block and bleed arrangement), representative seal or double block and bleed
11.1.41 of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? arrangement)
Was photograph no.42, one main cargo pump and, if in pump room, including bilges, representative of the condition as seen One main cargo pump and, if in pump
11.1.42 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? room, including bilges
Was photograph no.50, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.50 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? and discharge valve
Was photograph no.51, electric motors for deepwell pumps, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.51 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Electric motors for deepwell pumps
Was photograph no.52, compressor / motor room, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.52 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Compressor / motor room
Was photograph no.60, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.60 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? and discharge valve
Was photograph no.61, electric motors for deepwell pumps, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.61 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Electric motors for deepwell pumps
Was photograph no.62, compressor room internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.62 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Compressor room internal view
Was photograph no.70, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.70 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? and discharge valve
Was photograph no.71, a cargo tank vapour dome including cargo system relief valves, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank vapour dome including cargo
11.1.71 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? system relief valves
 Was photograph no.72, compressor house internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.72 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Compressor house internal view
Was photograph no.80, a cargo tank liquid dome including load and discharge valve, representative of the condition as seen A cargo tank liquid dome including load
11.1.80 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? and discharge valve
Was photograph no.81, general view of one Moss sphere, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.81 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? General view of one moss sphere
Was photograph no.82, compressor house internal view, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.82 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Compressor house internal view

Was photograph no.90, bow mooring arrangement from forward looking aft showing chain stopper, representative of the Bow mooring arrangement from forward
11.1.90 condition as seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? looking aft showing chain stopper
Was photograph no.91, bow mooring arrangement from aft looking forward showing winch, representative of the condition as Bow mooring arrangement from aft
11.1.91 seen onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? looking forward showing winch
Was photograph no.92, general view of hose connection area, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of
11.1.92 the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? General view of hose connection area
Was photograph no.93, hose coupling arrangement, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time of the
11.1.93 inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? Hose coupling arrangement
Was photograph no.94, general view forward bow thruster room, representative of the condition as seen onboard at the time
11.1.94 of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? General view forward bow thruster room
Was photograph no.95, forward bow thruster room showing one azimuth thruster, representative of the condition as seen Forward bow thruster room showing one
11.1.95 onboard at the time of the inspection and, if so, was it free of any areas for concern? azimuth thruster
Where the vessel traded in polar waters, had the Master, Chief Mate and officers in charge of a navigational watch undertaken
12.1.1 the additional training required by the Polar Code? Polar Code training

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the life-saving and fire- Life-saving and fire-fighting systems and
12.2.1 fighting systems and equipment in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? equipment in sub-zero temperatures
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the engine room machinery Engine room machinery and systems in
12.3.1 and systems in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? sub-zero temperatures
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the cargo and ballast systems Cargo and ballast systems in sub-zero
12.4.1 in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? temperatures

Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures to ensure the operability of the deck machinery, including Deck machinery and mooring equipment
12.5.1 mooring systems, in sub-zero temperatures, and had these procedures been complied with? in sub-zero temperatures
Were the Master and officers familiar with the company procedures for navigating in areas affected by ice, and had they
12.6.1 received suitable training? Navigating in areas affected by ice