Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DinagatIslandsProv ES2013
DinagatIslandsProv ES2013
Dinagat Islands was once a part of the 1st District of the Province of
Surigao del Norte until it became a separate province on October 2, 2006 through
Republic Act No. 9355 or the Charter of the Province of Dinagat Islands. The
formal operation of the newly created LGU started only in June 2007.
The Province of Dinagat Islands, being a newly created province, had its
full operation only in June 2007 after the election of the first set of local officials.
Hon. Geraldine B. Villaroman took the reign as the first Provincial Governor with
Hon. Elvis A. dela Merced as the first Vice Provincial Governor.
Just like any local government unit, the operation of the Province is
focused on proper fiscal management, promotion of government productivity and
efficiency in the delivery of basic services, peace and order, generation of
opportunities in the labor enterprise, agriculture, fishery and environmental
concerns, bolster economic activities by improving infrastructure facilities, and
strengthen various aspects of development in key areas of the Local Government
Unit agenda.
Fortunately, on October 24, 2012, the Province won the legal battle over
its legitimacy when the Supreme Court released the Final Entry of Judgment
declaring the creation of the Province of Dinagat Islands as constitutional.
Scope of Audit
The financial and compliance audit covered the accounts and operations of
the Province of Dinagat Islands for Calendar Year 2013. It was aimed at
determining whether the financial statements present fairly the financial position
and results of operations and cash flows of the Province for the year then ended
and at determining the extent of compliance with existing laws, rules and
regulations.
1. Cash in bank balances per cashbook and the subsidiary ledgers maintained
by the Accountant for General Fund and Trust Fund accounts of the
Province were still not reconciled, thus the correctness, accuracy and
reliability of the account could not be ascertained in violation of Section
181 (c) of the Government Accounting and Auditing Manual, Volume I.
Require the two offices, Accounting and Treasury, to fast track the
reconciliation of the cash in bank accounts regularly to obtain correct and
reliable balances of the depository accounts in compliance with Section
181(c) of the Government Accounting and Auditing Manual, Volume I.
Re-appropriate the unused amount on the same projects and fast track the
implementation/prosecution of the projects to minimize the effect of the delay to
the provincial development agenda.
7. The LGU failed to create the Provincial Solid Waste Management Board
in violation of the provision of Rule VI Section I of the IRR of Republic
Act 9003.
Create the Provincial Solid Waste Board as mandated in the Rule VI of the
Implementing Rules and Regulations of RA 9003 in order that a
comprehensive plan on solid waste management can be developed.
8. The Province engaged the services of two (2) lawyers as legal consultants
without the written conformity and acquiescence of the Solicitor General
and the written concurrence of the Commission on Audit, in violation of
COA Circular 98-002.
Adhere strictly to BIR Memorandum Circular No. 5-2006 by remitting the total
taxes withheld on or before the 10th day of the month following the month in
which the withholding was made.
10. General revision on real property assessment was not conducted since 2007, in
violation of the provision of Section 219 of RA 7160.
11. Various vouchers and payroll from January to December 2013 were not
submitted to the Office of the Auditor in violation of the provision of
Section 6.05 of COA Circular 95-006.
Adhere strictly to the provision of Section 6.05 of COA Circular No. 95-
006. Submit vouchers to the Office of the Auditor within the prescribed
period for timely review and post audit.
12. Some purchase Orders do not reflect the dates of receipt by the supplier, in
disregard of the instructions on the proper filling out of purchase orders as
outlined in Annex 29 of the NGAS Volume II and the provision of Section
117 of NGAS Volume I.
Follow strictly Administrative Order No. 17 dated July 28, 2011 in the
procurement of common-use office supplies and equipment.
15. Overtime services in the total amount of P126,000.00 were paid to physician
assigned in district hospitals of the Province on a flat rate basis which is
inconsistent with the provision of Item 4.0 of the Joint Circular No. 01, S.2012 of
the Department of Budget and Management and the Department of Health and
with the pertinent provision of Budget Circular No. 10 dated March 29, 1996.
Stop the practice of paying overtime services on a flat rate basis and adhere to the
provision of Budget Circular No. 10 in the computation of said benefits.
16. Personnel of the three district hospitals were granted hazard pay with an
aggregate amount of P395,551.60 for the months of January to March 2013,
without determining whether their exposure to hazard is high risk or low risk,
which is inconsistent to pertinent provisions of the Revised IRR of RA 7305 and
with the Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of 2012 of the Department of
Budget and Management and the Department of Health.
Follow strictly the provision of the Joint Memorandum Circular No. 1, series of
2012 of the DBM and DOH relative to the payment of hazard pay. Prepare a list
of positions in its plantilla with the corresponding job description that describes
the basis for justifying such positions that are exposed to high risk or low risk
hazard.
17. The grant of mobile communication allowance to officials and employees in the
total amount of P981,754.06 has the following deficiencies:
Set a limit of load allowances granted to the Officials and department heads of
the Province to manage government funds in accordance with laws, rules and
regulations. Require the Provincial Accountant to pay the load allowances thru
payroll and not thru reimbursement on a piecemeal basis to avoid additional use
of manpower and office supplies.
18. The hiring of job order employees has the following deficiencies which
are inconsistent with the guidelines for Local Chief Executives (LCES) on
Public Personnel Administration:
Two (2) of the ten (10) audit recommendations embodied in the 2012
Annual Audit Report were implemented by management, four (4) were partially
implemented and the remaining four (4) were not implemented.