Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 1

G.R. No. L-25694. November 29, 1976.

IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, LUCIO


SANTOS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. THE COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF
IMMIGRATION, Respondent-Appellant.
FERNANDO, J.
FACTS:
Santos was arrested under a warrant of arrest issued by the Commissioner, saying that
he is a Chinese citizen who entered the country illegally; that his real name is Ong
Hiong King. He filed a petition for habeas corpus and the lower court issued the same
commanding the Commissioner to release Santos. The lower court released Santos on
bail to ensure his appearance in the deportation proceedings which is still pending.
ISSUE:
Whether the arrest was valid.
HELD:
No. The Santos’ arrest was not valid.
The Constitution does not distinguish between warrants in a criminal case and
administrative warrants in administrative proceedings. If one suspected of having
committed a crime is entitled to a determination of the probable cause against him, by a
judge, why should one suspected of a violation of an administrative nature deserve less
guarantee? The arrest of a foreigner is necessary to carry into effect the power of
deportation is valid only when there is already an order of deportation. To carry out the
order of deportation, the President obviously has the power to order the arrest of the
deportee. But certainly, during the investigation, it cannot be effected.
The decision is AFFIRMED.

You might also like