IN THE MATTER OF THE PETITION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS, LUCIO
SANTOS, Petitioner-Appellee, v. THE COMMISSIONER, BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION, Respondent-Appellant. FERNANDO, J. FACTS: Santos was arrested under a warrant of arrest issued by the Commissioner, saying that he is a Chinese citizen who entered the country illegally; that his real name is Ong Hiong King. He filed a petition for habeas corpus and the lower court issued the same commanding the Commissioner to release Santos. The lower court released Santos on bail to ensure his appearance in the deportation proceedings which is still pending. ISSUE: Whether the arrest was valid. HELD: No. The Santos’ arrest was not valid. The Constitution does not distinguish between warrants in a criminal case and administrative warrants in administrative proceedings. If one suspected of having committed a crime is entitled to a determination of the probable cause against him, by a judge, why should one suspected of a violation of an administrative nature deserve less guarantee? The arrest of a foreigner is necessary to carry into effect the power of deportation is valid only when there is already an order of deportation. To carry out the order of deportation, the President obviously has the power to order the arrest of the deportee. But certainly, during the investigation, it cannot be effected. The decision is AFFIRMED.
Petitioner-Appellee vs. vs. Respondent Appellant Solicitor General Antonio Barredo, Assistant Solicitor General Antonio G. Ibarra and Solicitor Bernardo P. Pardo Sta. Ana and Mariano