Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mind Control
Mind Control
Mind Control
http://journals.cambridge.org/AMS
PETER KNIGHT
Reviews
Bert Bender has largely achieved his stated purpose of showing ‘‘ how post-
Darwinian writers have consciously sought to keep pace with developments in
science that have emerged not only in evolutionary biology itself, but in anthro-
pology, sociology, modern psychology and ecology ’’ (Preface, xiii ; original
emphasis), and in the process has given enriched readings of works by a number
of authors not normally associated with evolutionary thought. Bender’s arguments
are lucid and convincing, and his material (the works of fifteen writers active
during the eclipse of Darwinism between the 1890s and the 1950s) is well ordered,
making intelligent use of the plot summaries required by the unfamiliarity of some
of this diverse work. Bender’s careful structuring is particularly evident in the
chapter on the Harlem renaissance, where his focus on five novels published in
the same year (1928) gives scope for a wide-ranging discussion which includes
theories of both race and gender while maintaining clarity of thought and
expression.
Other aspects of this book are less successful, however. Tony Angell’s illus-
trations are easy on the eye but neither elucidate the point under discussion nor
develop the argument in general. Editing is occasionally sloppy, with references to
Moby-Dick, for example, being given by chapter number and title, rather than the
more helpful system of edition and page number. It would also be useful to have
the location of the illustrations signalled in the text by page number; the final
illustration, for example, is located on page 235 but discussed in the Introduction
(13), putting the reader to some unnecessary trouble to find it.
These are minor criticisms which should not be allowed to detract from the
book’s achievement overall. More damaging, however, is the lack of an appendix
giving brief details of the main scientific theories used, as such a wide range of work
(not only Darwin, but also Lamarck, Henri Bergson, Haeckel, Joseph Le Conte,
Peter Kropotkin, Freud, William James, and Havelock Ellis) is likely to be unfamiliar
in detail to many readers. The extensive bibliography helps solve this problem, but
an outline of the main theories available to the reader for constant reference would
be more useful still, especially in the frequent passages where a writer’s response to a
number of theories is discussed.
Nevertheless this is a fascinating book which places a number of authors in a new
light and is likely to interest a wide readership.
While interactions between European Americans and the Native American tribes
have been extensively studied, the long and complicated history of Native contact
with the African American population remains badly underexplored. This seems
particularly strange when one considers the crucial role that many American Indian
tribes played in suppressing or aiding slave revolts (e.g. the Stono Rebellion of 1739),
or the use of Buffalo Soldier troops to police reservations in the late 1800s, or indeed
the continuing existence of ‘‘ Black Indian ’’ tribes such as the Seminole or Lumbee.
In her short introduction to this bibliography, Lisa Bier suggests that previous
research into this area has been hampered by a fluctuating terminology for the two
races. This includes over three hundred tribal names, many generic terms for Black
and Indian people, and long-defunct terms such as ‘‘Zambo’’ or ‘‘ Mustee ’’ for
people with mixed African and Native parentage. This is a rather generous reading
of the situation, and it might also be permissible to deduce that a eurocentric
academy has until recently paid little attention to sustaining and funding scholarship
in this area. It is also noticeable that, while black authors such as Percival Everett
and Alice Walker (herself part-Native) have occasionally tackled Native themes in
their work, Native American literature still contains virtually no black characters.
This bibliography is, the author declares, virtually complete save for some minor
newspaper articles, and every entry includes full publishing information plus a short
summary of relevant aspects of the text. The summaries are exceptionally well-done ;
although each does give relevant information about the book in question, there are
few repeated facts, making this bibliography something of a potted history in itself.
There is also information on resources available from the Internet and video
libraries. The entries have been grouped into sections mostly organized around
geographic area, a move which reflects the regionalism of the vast majority of
available material, and there are special sections on Cherokee, Chickasaw, Choctaw,
Creek and Seminole, as well as the Buffalo Soldiers. Finally, there is a very com-
prehensive alphabetical index.
This is an exceptional piece of scholarship, clearly a labour of love on the part
of the author, which will prove useful to scholars, librarians and students and, it is to
be hoped, will help inspire new research into a woefully unknown area of American
history.
This book offers the most recent reference tool on Native American cultures of the
Northeast, a region that stretched from Canada to Tidewater Virginia and west to
the Ohio River Valley. The text is divided into four parts : an ethnographic and
historical summary from the ‘‘ Paleo-Indian Period ’’ to 2000, a dictionary of notable
people, places, and events, a brief historical timeline, and an annotated bibliography
of sources, both printed and electronic. Throughout there is a strong emphasis on
First self-published by Osage historian Louis Burns in 1984, Osage Indian Customs and
Myths is described in this new edition as the only comprehensive study of Osage
culture in book form. Coming as it does from a long tradition of ethnographical
accounts of cultural traditions that set out to ‘‘capture’’ a moment in the cultural
evolutionary process, it treads a testy boundary in modern historiography between
‘‘ past preserved ’’ and continuity in change.
This is by no means to question the integrity of the book and Burns, a member of
the Mottled Eagle Clan, lives up to the claim on the reverse cover that he is ‘‘ an
extremely meticulous researcher. ’’ With the addition of scholars such as David I.
Bushnell, whose accounts of burials and burial customs inform the chapter on
mourning customs, Burns’s principal source is Omaha anthropologist Francis La
Flesche, who, alongside Alice Fletcher, collected a wealth of recorded material from
the Osage between the 1880s and 1932.
After the heady days of the emergence of African American studies, the second
generation of AfricanAmerican scholars has begun to produce a set of basic
reference tools, The Encyclopedia of African American Culture and History (1996), the
Oxford Companion to African American Literature (1997), and the Norton Anthology of
Hofstra University L O U I S J. K E R N
The story has been told many times before : thirteen colonies unite in the face
of imperial encroachment – ‘‘setting the world ablaze,’’ to reiterate the title of an
earlier book by John Ferling. Ferling, of State University of West Georgia, a veteran
historian of revolutionary America, has produced with A Leap in the Dark a vintage
narrative of old-school political history, describing the creation of the American
republic. This wide-ranging book consists of the potatoes and bread of politics,
war, and foreign affairs, as Ferling admits to take interest in questions of ‘‘leader-
ship ’’ – that is, in great men – or the constellation who came to be known as the
Founding Fathers. Indeed, Ferling conveys a group biography of the men who
stood in the vanguard of the revolutionary struggle.
The book sparkles when it discusses John Muir, when it looks at the mystical
naturalism of Peter Matthiessen and when it looks at contemporary writers
such Marilynne Robinson and Annie Dillard. However, overall Sacred Nature fails to
investigate comprehensively the two key terms of its title, terms imbued with
culturally specific meaning and shifting valency. Nature and the sacred have never
been static concepts, and their definition and conceptual development in the United
States cannot be assumed to operate outside political, social, or literary dynamics of
power. The most interesting thing, after all, about the confluence of the sacred and
the natural in American letters is, as Renato Rosaldo has pointed out, the way in
which the ‘‘ attitude of reverence toward the natural developed at the same time that
North Americans intensified the destruction of their human and natural environ-
ment ’’ (Culture and Truth : The Remaking of Social Analysis, Beacon, 1989, 71). This ugly
underside to the American approach to land, the ability to simultaneously revere
what is actively being destroyed, receives only superficial attention in Gatta’s book.
This is not the case in studies such as Philip Fisher’s Hard Facts: Setting and From in
the American Novel (Oxford, 1985) and The Green Breast of the New World (Georgia,
1996) by Louise Wrestling. Their analysis of what is deemed sacred in literature
inevitably brings Native American and African American history, culture and
literature into sharp relief. By comparison, Gatta has decided to leave all things
Native American ‘‘to anthropologically trained specialists’’ (7) and to keep his
evaluative eye trained strictly upon the canonical. This assumption that Indian
literature is somehow discrete from the bulk of American literature and culture and
that its critical evaluation should remain the preserve of anthropologists is deeply
problematic. Gatta does mention Leslie Marmon Silko, Zitkala S̆a and Black Elk but
at no point is the centrality of Native American spiritual relationships to land given
sustained attention. Instead of literary Native American voices we hear once more
about a series of well-known Puritans, and then of Cooper, Emerson, Thoreau,
Hawthorne, and Melville and of the ecopoets Wendell Berry and Gary Synder.
Perhaps because he feels on surer ground with African American work, Gatta does
On the night of the 13 July 1977 a storm in Westchester County, north of New York
City, resulted in a series of freak lightning strikes on power lines. The electricity supply
for all five boroughs was knocked out. While Con Edison struggled to both explain
and shift the blame for this failure, an unusual, almost carnivalesque mood seized the
sweltering city. Thousands of people – some criminal, many desperately poor, others
just bored or caught up by the moment – indulged in an impulsive and opportunistic
orgy of looting. By dawn, thousands were under arrest, abandoned buildings were
ablaze and millions of dollars worth of consumer goods had been stolen.
In his original and unusual account of the 1977 New York blackout, James
Goodman eschews conventional, historical analysis. Instead, he adopts a much
more polyvalent, multivocal and intertextual approach, incorporating a multiplicity
of differing perspectives on the blackout. The book itself is split into fifty-three
brief sections, facilitating Goodman’s kaleidoscopic and episodic treatment of his
subject. Instead of presenting a single critical view of what happened and who was
to blame, his account questions the notion that such a complex historical event
can be reducible to a single causal explanation.
Goodman draws primarily on reports from local and national media, supple-
mented with first-hand and eyewitness accounts. Anecdotes about particular
incidents of looting are juxtaposed with the opinions of merchants facing ruin. By
contrasting looter with shopkeeper, these arguments parallel the political fallout be-
tween Con Edison and city officials, and between city officials and national govern-
ment. Goodman also digests and surveys popular media discourse inspired by the
blackout. From the editorials and letter pages of publications such as the New Times
and Commentary, Goodman articulates the different perspectives put forward by
liberal, conservative and radical commentators. While right-wing pundits, as well as
many ordinary citizens, denounced the looters as ‘‘animals, ’’ others highlighted
the socioeconomic pattern of the looting, as well as the high unemployment
and severe urban neglect that blighted the city. Weaving personal accounts – and
justifications – of the looting alongside various strands of political discourse gener-
ated by the event, Goodman complicates and undermines simplistic political gen-
eralizations about why the blackout provoked such disorder. The result is a highly
entertaining (if at times rather lightweight) book, giving a vivid, almost novelistic pres-
entation of the blackout and its socioeconomic, cultural and political repercussions.
John Houchin’s book Censorship of the American Theatre in the Twentieth Century argues
that conservatives in twentieth-century America consistently perceived theatre as a
threat because of its power to transform society. Censors therefore targeted sexually
transgressive plays and plays and playwrights with radical political messages.
Houchin’s strongest chapters, two and three, together deal with the period from
1900 to 1930. These chapters provide historical context and thorough details behind
the censorship of several major plays. Placed on the context of growing concern
over prostitution, the efforts to censor four plays dealing with prostitution in 1913
and 1914 (The Lure, The Fight, The Traffic, and The House of Bondage) are discussed
in great depth. Critics and public officials, outraged at what they perceived as a
promotion of immoral behavior, effectively worked to change or eliminate offensive
scenes. Despite the censorship, however, the author effectively demonstrates that
these plays represented a new direction for the American stage, one where human
sexuality would be portrayed. As more lurid productions were produced in New
York in the 1920s, public officials increasingly took notice of the theatre. Censorship
debates often focussed on who should have the power to censor plays : the state,
local officials, or citizen organizations. Eventually, in 1927, New York State passed
Michael J. Klarman’s book examines the interaction between the Supreme Court,
constitutional history and the African American struggle for freedom and equality
from the 1890s to the 1960s. Although the study is not formally broken into sections
it includes three distinct parts. The first part, chapters 1 to 3, navigates the dense
legal thicket of court decisions that shaped much of segregation law from the 1890s
up to the Second World War. The second part, chapters 4 and 5, provides greater
detail and more in-depth examination of court cases during the Second World War.
The third part, chapters 6 and 7, provides yet more detailed analysis of just one area
of focus, school desegregation, and in particular the landmark 1954 Brown v. Board of
Education decision and its impact on the course of the civil rights movement.
The structure of Klarman’s study indicates its strengths and weaknesses. It is
admirably clear and accessible and sets out a credible thesis of how the Supreme
Court became increasingly important to the civil rights movement, moving from
abstinence to hesitancy to intervention to decisive action. Yet while this structure
suits Klarman’s thesis it provides an uneven survey overall. As the focus narrows to
Brown and school desegregation the book loses sight of legal developments in other
The Waccamaw Siouan tribe in North Carolina is one of any number of groups of
Native people in the United States whose tribal status is contested at local, state, and
national levels, most visibly enacted currently by the struggle of the Lumbee Indians
in North Carolina to gain full federal recognition. Waccamaw Legacy traces the history
of that contested status, exploring issues such as the origins and provenance of the
community, their relationship with North Carolina’s other Indian communities,
their ties to traditional culture, and the origin and accuracy of their moniker.
In many ways, Lerch offers a standard narrative history – its minute detail is at
times relatively dry, the complexity of relationships inevitably confusing. Yet
the significance of this narrative to the wider narratives of self-determination and
self-governance is clear, revolving as it does around the Waccamaw Bill, presented
to Congress in 1950 amidst the rising popularity of Termination. Frequently
returning to this pivotal point, Lerch builds a chronological story of the progression
of these people (loosely termed the Cape Fear Indians) from contact, through
the various stages of settlement of the Cape Fear area, including changes in self-
identification, from Cape Fear, to Cherokee, to ‘‘ Wide Awake, ’’ to Siouan Indians,
stressing all the while that the Waccamaw Siouan believe the only significant change
in this time has been the name by which they have been identified.
The story Lerch tells is not to any significant degree the ‘‘people’s ’’ story, insofar
as the majority of her sources are past historians, anthropologists, and eth-
nographers. As such, this book catalogues the attempts of scholars, among whom
the professor of anthropology at the University of North Carolina is merely one in a
long (and distinguished) succession, to identify and ‘‘ authenticate ’’ the heritage of
the Waccamaw Siouan. There is an obvious irony inherent in this. Lerch states,
several times, that her book is about the efforts of the Waccamaw Siouan to self-
identify. And yet, as she equally frequently shows, the state and federal recognition
they desire in order to protect, first, their right to independence in schooling, and
then their fragile land base, has depended on this historic and scientific proof. It is
for this reason that the tribe engaged Lerch in her work, and the resulting text
ultimately represents a fascinating overview of the long-standing relationships
between the tribe and their various scholarly touchstones.
University of Kent DAVID STIRRUP
Mary Ruggie examines how funding and research have been implemented to in-
vestigate the safety and efficacy of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM).
Ruggie traces the history of CAM in America and demonstrates how CAM con-
tinues to be subjected to scientific research testing, in order to be accepted by, and
integrated into, conventional medical practice. Much of the basis for the book stems
from a 1995 conference in which participants made some headway in classifying
CAM terms.
Ruggie’s book starts by contrasting how science is perceived as having a superior
status in society, legitimizing claims, by proving them with statistical results that
can be repeated in measurable trials; whereas CAM has been perceived in the past
by the American Medical Association in terms such as ‘‘ quackery, ’’ ‘‘ sorcery, ’’ and
‘‘ voodoo, ’’ with reference to cults.
Ruggie demonstrates how CAM as a holistic way of life is becoming increasingly
popular in America. The popularity of CAM is evidenced by numerous medical
schools offering courses in CAM, the profusion of published literature on CAM,
manifest media interest in CAM, government support for researching funding
(which increases yearly – revealing $2 million in 1992, comparable with $247.6
million in 2002), and increased public spending : ‘‘ Americans are currently spending
more than $20 billion on dietary supplements alone ’’ (43). Ruggie explores different
types of CAM, including naturopathy, yoga, meditation, dietary supplements,
acupuncture, homeopathy, tai chi and qigong. Ruggie points out how public’s self-
help usage of CAM, and desire for autonomy of their own treatments, has created an
interest amongst physicians an in turn a response of financial coverage by insurance
companies.
Throughout the book, Ruggie looks at the difficulty of subjecting the non-
medical CAM to conventional medical standards (with sham procedures) and
claims that because of its background history, CAM will always be subjected to
more rigorous testing than conventional medical trails to prove its worth. In
chapter 6 Ruggie’s interesting descriptions of exciting new CAM research trials,
which had effectively taken into account how to create controls, were disappoint-
ingly followed time and time again with anticlimactic statements, regarding either
the study being so far incomplete or the research findings not being published
yet.
Ruggie concludes that whilst CAM is becoming ‘‘mainstream ’’ and will more
frequently be integrated to work alongside conventional medicine, particularly
in a preventative sense (including specific clinics set up to combine both),
The subtitle of this showcase of recent scholarship indicates two of its characteristic
themes. On the one hand, we reminded that English Protestantism has not been
the only religious tradition that has left its mark on the region ; the importance of
Native American, African, Jewish and Catholic beliefs and practices are beginning
to be recognized. On the other, it is evident that the more familiar Evangelical
tradition has come under increasingly critical scrutiny – as a force that both
oppresses and empowers its followers (especially women and blacks), often at the
same time.
The ten essays – organized chronologically according to their subject matter –
take us from the colonial period to the 1960s. Several contributors attend closely to
the personal dimensions of religious experience, drawing on lesser-known autobio-
graphical writings. Elsewhere, life stories serve as the pretext for more general
reflections on neglected aspects of southern religion, especially its modernity : its
secularization, bureaucratization and commodification.
While all of the contributions provide snapshots of the authors’ more detailed
research in recent or forthcoming monographs, sometimes a little awkwardly
condensed, the collection includes three longer essays that develop more sustained
and assured arguments. Lynn Lyerly examines the work of black and white
women within and beyond the church bureaucracies, deftly exploring the some-
times conflicting impulses of a ‘‘ proper mother ’’ and a ‘‘proper wife. ’’ In what is
effectively a genealogy of the civil rights movement, Paul Harvey identifies carni-
valistic ‘‘liminal moments ’’ where segregation was breached (especially in the early
Holiness and Pentecostal churches, but leaving their mark on later gospel music
and music influenced by it) and the more direct challenge to racism found in the
middle-class initiatives such as the Commission on Interracial Cooperation and its
successors.
But the collection’s outstanding centerpiece is provided by Donald G. Mathews’s
provocative yet subtle observations on lynching – understood not as a secular
practice that white southern evangelicals had views about, but as a ritual that pro-
ceeded from a nexus of sacred beliefs that were beyond question. Lynching, he
argues, was a primal. Christian act, that nevertheless could not anticipate the
way African Americans transformed the victim into an innocent martyr, punished
not for his alleged sins, but for belonging to a particular race. As a guide to
new developments in the study of southern religion, this book is invaluable – and
Dana Cairns Watson proposes an exciting critical agenda : to excavate the ‘‘deep
structures ’’ (61) of conversation in Gertrude Stein’s works and thereby to reveal a
radical political discourse with the potential to change self and nation. It sounds an
intriguing and worthwhile project : unfortunately – perhaps unsurprisingly, given its
ambition – it does not quite come off.
The reader, in fact, has to wait some time before any Steinian conversation is
quoted, let alone excavated. In the (too brief) discussion of Three Lives in the opening
chapter, it is surprising not to hear any of the long, languorous exchanges between
Melanctha and Jeff Campbell, Jamesian in the power of their non-oral communi-
cation, and surely crucial to Cairns Watson’s thesis. But if vital quotation from
conversation is missing, there is superfluous quotation from secondary sources,
which proliferates, weed-like, to choke the arguments. The motive appears to be
apotropaic, as if no point can stand unsupported. Harold Bloom is dragged in to
bolster a section on influence ; Saussure is invoked as authority that ‘‘the relation of
words to their meaning is fundamentally arbitrary ’’ (117) – such an over-simplifi-
cation of what he did say as to be worthless. (Oddly, though, others, whose presence
might have been expected – Wittgenstein, J. L. Austin, Virginia Woolf – are absent.)
The sentence (not untypical) ‘‘Stein urges Americans to listen to themselves talk in
clichés, just as Jacob Riis, the early photographer, made Americans look at American
streets, which were not paved with gold ’’ (27) made this reviewer first blink at
the gratuitous allusion, then wonder whether the cliché at the end was a self-
incriminating witticism or just a cliché, and then speculate as to whether Cairns
Watson’s prose was itself aspiring to its subject’s stylistic faux naı̈veté.
Cairns Watson’s method throughout is to expose the aural connections or ‘‘ nearly
sounds’’ (110) which a reader of Stein’s prose might miss. ‘‘Susie Asado, ’’ for
example, said three times fast, sounds like ‘‘you see as I do’’ (84). This is useful,
well-done analysis – particularly in its etymological investigations – and supports
the important argument that words can be cubist. The sections on William
James’s thinking and Stein’s own research in neurophysiology and possible
aphasia provide thought-provoking suggestions as to her stylistic motivations. If
the argument for her conversational ‘‘ deep structures ’’ is ultimately unconvincing,
the book can nevertheless be recommended as good, clear textual analysis of Stein’s
oeuvre. As such, it will be a welcome resource for students.
Oxford University KATE MCLOUGHLIN