Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BS en 12685 - 1998
BS en 12685 - 1998
| BS EN
|
|
|
12685:1998
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Biotechnology Ð Modified |
|
|
|
organisms for application in |
|
|
|
|
the environment Ð Guidance |
|
|
|
for the monitoring strategies |
|
|
|
|
for deliberate release of |
|
|
|
genetically modified |
|
|
|
|
micro-organisms, including |
|
|
|
viruses |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The European Standard EN 12685:1998 has the status of a |
British Standard |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ICS 07.080; 07.100.01 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NO COPYING WITHOUT BSI PERMISSION EXCEPT AS PERMITTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW
|
|
|
|
Copyright British Standards Institution
Provided by IHS under license with BSI
No reproduction or networking permitted without license from IHS Not for Resale
BS EN 12683:1998
National foreword
This British Standard is the English language version of EN 12685:1998.
The UK participation in its preparation was entrusted to Technical Committee
CII/58, Biotechnology, which has the responsibility to:
contract. Users of British Standards are responsible for their correct application.
Compliance with a British Standard does not of itself confer immunity
from legal obligations.
Summary of pages
This document comprises a front cover, an inside front cover, the EN title page,
pages 2 to 10, an inside back cover and a back cover.
BSI 1998
Descriptors: biotechnology, genetics, modified organisms, environments, environmental protection, inspection, experimental design
English version
United Kingdom.
CEN
European Committee for Standardization
Comite EuropeÂen de Normalisation
EuropaÈisches Komitee fuÈr Normung
1998 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national
Members.
Ref. No. EN 12685:1998 E
Foreword Contents
This European Standard has been prepared by Page
Technical Committee CEN/TC 233, Biotechnology, the
Secretariat of which is held by AFNOR. Foreword 2
This European Standard shall be given the status of a Introduction 3
national standard, either by publication of an identical 1 Scope 3
text or by endorsement, at the latest by January 1999, 2 Normative references 3
and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn
at the latest by January 1999. 3 Definitions 3
This European Standard has been prepared under a 4 General considerations 4
mandate given to CEN by the European Commission 5 Monitoring strategy 4
and the European Free Trade Association.
Annex A (informative) Relationship
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, between a sampling and monitoring valid
the national standards organizations of the following strategy 9
countries are bound to implement this European
Standard: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Annex B (informative) Bibliography 10
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Luxembourg, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
c) The choice of methods used for monitoring h) Factors to be taken into account include the ease
depends upon the purpose for which the monitoring and simplicity of conventional cultural methods for
is done and should enable detection of events under microbiology and virology and their ability to screen
study. The nature of the GMM and its hosts can help large numbers of samples, but sensitivity and
to determine the methods used for monitoring a application to viable non-culturable micro-organisms
release; different types of GMM can require different could be limited. Molecular amplification techniques
techniques for monitoring. Key factors to be are usually more rapid and sensitive, but cannot
considered in the establishment of a monitoring readily be used to estimate population sizes and are
strategy would include: very prone to inhibition and reduced detection limits
Ð environmental location, e.g. air, soil, water; due to typical environmental matrix components.
Moreover, they do not generally give an indication of
Ð type of GMM, e.g. bacteria, fungi;
the potential viability of the GMM.
Ð type and number of hosts; i) Although observation of the trial site is unlikely to
Ð state of GMM, e.g. spore, vegetative or be able to provide confirmation of the presence of
ªdormantº cells; the released GMM, this observation can give the first
Ð transmission of GMM e.g. seedborne, aphid indication of an expected or unexpected effect.
transmission; j) The transfer of the inserted gene(s) from the
Ð any symbiotic relationship; released GMM to a resident recipient should result
Ð environmental persistence. in the appearance of the gene(s) of interest in a new
genetic background. For example, for viruses, the
Thus GMMs dispersed through the air can require inserted gene can code for an insect specific toxin,
very different sampling and detection techniques insect hormone, pharmaceutically active protein; for
from soil micro-organisms or those with a symbiotic bacteria and fungi, the inserted gene can code for
relationship with another, higher organism. heavy metal or other resistance, or the ability to
d) The validity of any one method, or combination degrade a particular xenobiotic compound.
of methods, can be affected by the ease and Micro-organisms possessing the genes can be able to
accuracy of identification of the introduced GMMs grow on the appropriate selective or elective media
and/or the introduced genes. Identification of GMMs containing the particular heavy metal, antibiotic or
should ideally be by means of easily recognizable xenobiotic compound. If the released GMM has a
phenotypic or genotypic characteristics (see Annex B well-defined genetic background such as
[4], [5]). chromosomal markers, the appearance of
e) To facilitate monitoring, the released GMM should characteristics of the transgene(s) in a different
be unequivocally recognizable. Any identifying genetic background can indicate that the transgenes
characteristic should ideally be stable, and clearly have been transferred into (resident) recipient
different from the equivalent characteristic displayed organisms. If the released GMM does not have a
by local microbial communities or viral populations. well-defined genetic background, the appearance of
Marker characteristics that are easy to identify can the transgene in a recipient organism should be
be suitable for assessing the spread of the GMM or verified by appropriate molecular methods. However,
horizontal transfer of genetic material. it should be noted that in environmental samples
such as soil, the majority of viable micro-organisms
f) For some releases it cannot be possible to detect
present cannot be cultured by conventional
GMMs by direct recovery. Once released into the
laboratory techniques, or cannot express the
environment some micro-organisms can undergo
transferred gene. In such cases, appropriate
physiological changes which lead to them being no
molecular methods should also be applied.
longer culturable under standard laboratory
conditions. Alternative monitoring techniques can be k) The reacquisition of deleted gene(s) from
at the DNA-level, in which case the experiment can endemic populations into the GMM should be
need to demonstrate that the DNA/RNA target is assessed using molecular biology or cultural
associated with or derived from GMMs contained in methods.
the sample, or be related to the effect(s) the GMM l) Other characteristics which can be suitable for
should have, for example its effects as a biocontrol monitoring purposes include biochemical
agent. characteristics or end-products of the gene product
g) In many cases, monitoring can need an estimation or micro-organism (for example, alloenzyme analysis,
of the population size of the released GMMs. or metabolic properties used in micro-organism
Suitable, quantitative methods can therefore be identification), and DNA characteristics, including
necessary, and appropriate statistical analysis RFLP and RAPD profiling analysis and DNA
methods can also be required. Such data, gathered amplification (see Annex B [5]).
over time can indicate whether the released The validity of the initial design of the monitoring
population is surviving, multiplying or declining. protocol should be re-assessed, based on a review of
the above considerations, prior to the final definition of
the monitoring protocol before execution.
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
5.4 Execution of the monitoring protocol d) It can also be relevant to consider mechanisms of
dispersal such as by physical means (wind or water
5.4.1 General
dispersal) or via microbial vectors which can be
The monitoring protocol should be executed in three biological (insects and other animals), or man-made
stages: (vehicles).
a) sampling (see 5.4.2); e) It should be noted that some released GMMs may
b) obtaining data (see 5.4.3); not remain associated with a fixed physical site; for
c) valid analysis of data (see 5.4.4). example, micro-organisms which are released into a
water course.
5.4.2 Sampling Other factors can also affect the dispersal,
It is essential that sampling regimes for collection of establishment and/or persistence of the GMM or its
relevant material and/or observations for monitoring host and the ability to detect and monitor these events.
purposes are valid and realistic. Sampling should be Abiotic factors can include:
carried out in accordance with EN 12686.
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Ð pH;
5.4.3 Obtaining data Ð light;
Monitoring data should be obtained by the method(s) Ð temperature;
determined in the monitoring protocol, over the
appropriate timescale and relevant area. Ð humidity;
The frequency and extent of monitoring during the Ð soil drainage characteristics;
release should be adequate to ensure that the Ð micro-climate including shelter or exposure;
objectives of the monitoring strategy can be met, and Ð prevailing wind direction (important if the
should take into account the estimated growth, micro-organism could be dispersed by wind);
survival and/or transfer abilities of the micro-organism
Ð macro-climate;
in field conditions. It should be noted that estimates
obtained in laboratory conditions are not necessarily Ð site security and access.
relevant for the field situation. Biotic factors can include:
Monitoring should be carried out over the relevant Ð trophic interactions;
area, in accordance with the objectives of the Ð fitness;
experimental design; in general, monitoring should
concentrate on the release site, plus the likely dispersal Ð competition;
area. The following factors should be considered when Ð human intervention.
estimating how far the micro-organism is likely to be 5.4.4 Valid analysis of data
dispersed.
The data analysis, regardless of the method(s) applied,
a) The size of the potential dispersal area depends should be regarded as valid if:
on the type of GMM, host and possibly the scale of
the proposed release, and the way in which the a) the experiment has been performed according to
GMM is released. For example, a large area used for the written protocol or any deviations from the
the release, or application by a spray could increase protocol have been indicated;
the potential for spread. b) samples and appropriate controls are analysed
b) In some cases, if a micro-organism, a host or a simultaneously using the same methods;
microbial vector occupies a particular niche, the c) all controls give expected results;
micro-environment of the niche can be significantly d) sensitivity and reproducibility of the applied
different from the wider environment of the release method(s) are appropriate;
site. This can impart a degree of confinement on the e) where required, a statistically relevant number of
dispersal of the micro-organism. samples and controls has been analysed;
c) Estimates of the size of the dispersal area should f) relevant external factors which can affect the
be based both on practical and on theoretical analysis and/or interpretation of the results have
considerations. They should include the scale of the been taken into account; and
proposed release. Dispersal can be influenced by the
ability of either the GMM, its host or its microbial g) results are recorded and appropriately expressed
vector to form spores, resting forms and other and realistically assessed with regard to the
specialized structures. information value of the applied method.
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Annex A (informative)
Relationship between a sampling and monitoring valid strategy
When genetically modified micro-organisms are subject to experimental release into the environment, the
sampling strategy is dependent upon the objectives of the monitoring strategy. Therefore, the monitoring strategy
encompasses the sampling strategy both of which are required to meet the objectives of the monitoring. The
relationship between the sampling and monitoring strategy for deliberate releases of a genetically modified
micro-organism is given in Figure A.1.
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
Figure A.1 Ð Development of a monitoring and sampling valid strategy for deliberate
releases of genetically modified micro-organisms in the environment
Annex B (informative)
Bibliography
[1] Council Directive 90/219/EEC of 23 April 1990
on the contained use of genetically modified
micro-organisms. OJEC 08.05.1990,
no. L 117, p 1.
[2] Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990
on the deliberate release into the environment
of genetically modified organisms OJEC
08.05.1990, no. L117, p 15.
[3] International vocabulary of basic and general
terms in metrology. ISO 1993, Eurachem
--`,`,-`-`,,`,,`,`,,`---
guidance document no 1 Ð 1993
[4] EN 12682, Biotechnology Ð Modified
organisms for application in the
environment Ð Guidance for the
characterization of genetically modified
organism by analysis of the functional
expression of the genomic modification
[5] EN 12687, Biotechnology Ð Modified
organisms for application in the
environment Ð Guidance for the
characterization of genetically modified
organism by analysis of the genomic
modification