Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Islam 1980 Graduate Unemployment in Bangladesh A Preliminary Analysis
Islam 1980 Graduate Unemployment in Bangladesh A Preliminary Analysis
Islam 1980 Graduate Unemployment in Bangladesh A Preliminary Analysis
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
Rizwanul Islam*
I. INTRODUCTION
* The author is currently associated with the Asian Regional Team for Em-
ployment Promotion, ILO- ARTEP, Bangkok, Thailand. This paper is based on
some of the results represented in a forthcoming publication of the International
Institute for Educational Planning, Paris. The surveys were carried out by the
Foundation for Research on Educational Planning and Development, Dacca. He i
grateful to the Foundation for providing access to the filied-in questionnaires. The
responsibility for the present paper, however, lies solely with him.
1 See pj.
3 It has, of course, been argued that such attitudes are not mere prejudices, but the
reflection of a realistic appraisal of actual prospects in the job market. See Foster [4j.
4 See Mulat 1 7 J. Also compare with Blaug's view that the pool of unem
educated is a revolving queue in which an individual may be unemployed for t
three years while searching for the best available job opportunity. See Blaug I 2 j
TABLE I
Number of Number of Í
Category Graduate Unemployed Percentage
Respondents Graduates | Unemployed
Sex
Male 284 123 43.31
Female 47 32 68.09
Area of Residence
Rural 246 113 45.93
Urban 85 42 49.41
Family Income
Upper 121 51 42.15
Upper-middle 98 52 53.06
Lower-middle 85 40 47.06
Lower 27 12 44-44
One would have also expected a positive relationship between the level
of family income of the graduates and the rate of unemployment. The
reasoning would be that with their greater staying power the graduates of upper
income families could afford to remain unemployed more easily rather than
accept a job below their expectations. Those from lower income groups on
the other hand are likely to be compelled to accept whatever they get rather
than remain unemployed.6 But the data presented in Table I do not show
any strong relationship between the rate of unemployment and family income
of the graduates- the highest income group showing the lowest rate of unem-
ployment. After this group, however, the relationship looks more systematic.
6 This type of reasoning gets some indirect support from the fact that the average
actual income of the employed graduates is positively related to their family income*
See Section V,
Number of Number of
Specialization Graduate Unemployed Percentage
I Respondents Graduates | Unemployed
Agriculture 77 15 19.43
Arts 63 48 76.19
Commerce 21 17 80.95
Economics 9 3 33.33
Engineering 33 1 3.30
Law 10 4 40.00
Management 8 7 87.50
Medical 8 0 0
Science 74 44 59.46
Social Science 28 16 57.14
|
Category of Graduates
τ Less tha
3 Months Months 6 Months Unemployed dl
Area of Residence
Rural 72 13 40 113 246
(29.27) (5.29) (16.26) (45.93)
Urban 22 8 11 42 85
(25,88) (9.41) (12,95) (59.41)
Family Income
Upper 38 9 17 54 121
(31.41) (7.44) (14.05) (44.63)
Upper-middle 23 3 14 51 98
(23.47) (3.06) (16.32) (52.04)
Lower-middle 25 7 14 38 85
(29.41) (8.24) (16.48) (44.71)
Lower 8 2 4 12 27
(29.63) (7.41) (14.81) (44.44)
Specialization
Agriculture 29 7 21 15 77
(37.66) (9.09) (27.28) (19.48)
Arts 9 2 2 48 63
(14.28) (3,17) ( 3.18) (76.19)
Commerce 3 0 0 17 21
(14.28) (80.95)
Economics 6 0 0 3 9
(66.67) (33.33)
Engineering 6 3 23 1 33
(18.18) (9.09) (69.69) ( 3.30)
Law 3 114 10
(30.00) (10.00) (10.00) (40.00)
Management 1 0 0 7 8
(12.50) (87.50)
Medical 7 0 1 0 8
(87.50) (12.50)
Science 18 8 3 44 74
(24.33) (10.81) ( 4.05) (59.46)
Social Science 12 0 0 16 28
(42.86) (57.16)
All Groups 94 21 51 155 331
(28.40) (6.35) (15.40) (46.83)
Note : ♦ The individual columns may not add up to the total becaus
not provide any answer to this question are not included here. T
within parentheses represent percentages of the row totals,
Source : Graduates* Survey.
It is clear from these results that the relevance of education for the
jobs available in the market does have a positive impact on the demand
for graduates. This increases their employability and consequently, reduces
the incidence of unemployment amongst them* The hypothesis that the
TABLE V
<?n*rîflli7sirinn specialization Very Much I Moderately Not at all ΐτηΐΛ«Λ™,« Unkn0WI* Ι τΛ#Λι T
<?n*rîflli7sirinn specialization Helpful Moderately Helpful Helpful 1 ΐτηΐΛ«Λ™,« Unkn0WI* Ι τΛ#Λι Total
Agriculture 45 12 4 1 62
(72.58) (19.35) (6.45) (1.61) (100.00)
Arts 3 9 2 1 15
(20.00) (60.00) (13.33) (6.67) (100.00)
Commerce 1 2 10 4
(25.00) (50.00) (25.00) (100.00)
Economics 4 2 0 0 6
(66.67) (33.33) (100.00)
Engineering 23 8 1 0 32
(71.88) (25.00) (3.12) (100.00)
Law 3 1 2 0 6
(50.00) (16.67) (33.33) (100.00)
Management 0 1 ο ο 1
(100.00) (100.00)
Medical 8 0 0 0 8
(100.00) (100.00)
Science 14 10 5 1 30
(46.67) (33.33) (16.67) (3.33) (100.00)
Social Science 3 6 2 1 12
(25.00) (50.00) (16.67) (8.33) (100.00)
Total 104 51 17 4 176
(59.09) (28.98) (9.66) (2.27) (100.00)
Note : Figures within parentheses represent percentages
Source : Graduates' Survey,
Ζ,
Ο
ϊ |1| ° « ξ. |o ο ο ο ο ο ο 5J f
i
< V3 w CM -ν
"ϊ β· δ- ^ w ϊ
υ
<
|_ -|° ° c c ° « -| β ο Nf
i 1 §
|οβ»»|οοοβββ w^
I S I
> eu
1.1
< |I| ° ° ° « « « "ÖO ο ο „ft
g O__W <£, ο
g
5|g«ge - ». ο β-8.«8,«δβ - « β f
_£«? ^ ο «si? é2é β
i .1 s . ä
Ι ι 1 Ι ι II i ?
Q
I I I I i il l a i 1 I
CD
W4
I « >-•>-/
g
Λ !
δ Ι
XL co ^
<U ^ CO o ο O O C· Ο Ο Ο ο -ΙΟ
I Ë.
•S
«TC ~ S*
3
«ο 2
3 « «TC § .. S ~
ο !·|·| .. ê <
1 |*fl 's
LU
CO
52·§
S «η 5^° f
-3ο -
° °δ °- 8.
«> β 2 ° *S8.
S - S^S
8
t$ - ζ * ~ ~ &
Ills ρ * § s ε U d
~~ΓVV /«X
/«X y*^
y*^^ ^*
^ ^^*
f^,,^ -f^,,
|-^ - ·""■
|-^ 5> ^ a ^
·""■ ,- ··
11 a * δ *
«Ο (Λ Ό
tí ** ο ^> λ
•Β tí II Ι« 8 Ι |θ
S „ ö | -a S s i w Ε ..
1 1 ι î Ι ι Ι δ % S 1 ι ϋ 1
First, as many as 283 graduates (i.e., 85 per cent of the total) expec
to get some job in the public sector, although only 10 per cent of th
succeeded. The preference is thus not only for white collar jobs but o
whelmingly for the public sector. But the small number of successful gradu
only indicates the low absorptive capacity of the public sector.
'This conclusion, however, does not apply equally to the arts and social scie
graduates.
Public Sector
Superior administration 99 0
Foreign service 31 0
Judicial service 6 0
University teaching 58 4 ( 6.90)
Government education 38 0
Engineering 17 13 (76.47)
Medical 7 6 (85.71)
Defence 8 1 (12.50)
Agricultural specialist 11 4 (36.36)
Others 8 0
Sub-total 283 28 ( 9.89)
Private Sector
Private executive 5 0
Other private service 3 1 (33.33)
Private education 1 1(100.00)
Others 2 1 (50.00)
Sub-total 11 3 (27.27)
Self-Employment
Agriculturist 3 0
Trade 3 0
Manufacturing 1 0
Others 1 0
Sub-total 8 0
Inappropriate or no answer 29
Note : Figures within parentheses express the figures in the second column as
percentage of those in the first.
Source : Graduates* Survey.
TABLE VIII
TABLE IX
This also explains our earlier results about the career expectations of gra-
duates. Graduates see their education primarily as a vehicle for achieving social
prestige and upward mobility in a society characterised by class differentiation.
This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that students from lower income fami-
lies also consider prestige to be the most important characteristic a job should
possess.
TABLE X
TABLE XI
It is seen from this table that more responses are associated with the
reason described as 'absence of an influential guardian.' Apparently important
factors like 'labour market too competitive' and 'selected the wrong speciali*
zation' ranked third and fourth according to thé number of responses
associated with various factors. This implies that the unemployed graduates
TABLE XII
Newspaper advertisements 88 5 0 93
(68.76) (11.36) (0.00) (52.84)
Employment exchange 0 0 0 0
Friends and relations 7 17 1 25
( 5.47) (36.36) (33.33) (13.64)
Others 27 21 2 50
(21.09) (47.73) (66.67) (28.98)
No response 6 2 0 8
( 4.69) ( 2.55) (0.00) ( 4.55)
~ToTaï ~~ "Ϊ28 ~~ 45 ~ 3 176
(100.00) (100.00) (100.00) (100.00)
Note : Figures within parentheses represent percentages of column totals.
Source : Graduates* Survey.
VII. CONCLUSION
REFERENCES
Appendix
SAMPLING METHODOLOGY FOR THE STUDENTS*
AND GRADUATES' SURVEYS
There are 255 general degree colleges in the country, a larger number of
which are in the rural areas. Out of these, only five colleges, one located in a
typical urban centre and four in rural areas ( one from each of the four admi-
nistrative divisions ), were purposively selected for inclusion in the survey.
Resource constraint was presumably the principal reason for limiting the
number of colleges to five.