According to the document, there are several pieces of evidence that suggest Jose Rizal did not actually retract his beliefs and criticisms before his execution. This includes issues with the retraction document itself, such as questionable handwriting and inconsistencies. Additionally, facts like the retraction not being made public until 1935 and no efforts being made to save Rizal from execution despite the alleged retraction. His burial also lacked standard Catholic rituals and records, further implying he did not convert and retract before dying. Overall, many details do not fit with the story of Rizal truly recanting his views at the end.
According to the document, there are several pieces of evidence that suggest Jose Rizal did not actually retract his beliefs and criticisms before his execution. This includes issues with the retraction document itself, such as questionable handwriting and inconsistencies. Additionally, facts like the retraction not being made public until 1935 and no efforts being made to save Rizal from execution despite the alleged retraction. His burial also lacked standard Catholic rituals and records, further implying he did not convert and retract before dying. Overall, many details do not fit with the story of Rizal truly recanting his views at the end.
According to the document, there are several pieces of evidence that suggest Jose Rizal did not actually retract his beliefs and criticisms before his execution. This includes issues with the retraction document itself, such as questionable handwriting and inconsistencies. Additionally, facts like the retraction not being made public until 1935 and no efforts being made to save Rizal from execution despite the alleged retraction. His burial also lacked standard Catholic rituals and records, further implying he did not convert and retract before dying. Overall, many details do not fit with the story of Rizal truly recanting his views at the end.
The first evidence presented for those people we I mean who
believed that Rizal did not retracted is the retraction document itself is forgery or peke, as pointed by pascual the handwriting on the retraction is questionable parang isang tao lang yung gumawa sa retraction kase isa lang yung sulat or concsistent yung way ng sulat sa retraction and another is yung pagamin nung mismong taong gumawa ng pekeng dokumento kay Antonio abad noong august 13, 1901. So sinabi nya don na napag utusan lang tong taong to at binayaran sya ng mga pari para gumawa ng pekeng retraction at gumawa ng maraming kopya ………………………………………………………………….. 2nd evidence is some informations or facts do not fit well with the retraction story and some of the ff are the retraction document was not made in public until 1935 so hindi sya lumabas bago mag 1935 so hindi sya na publicize and ang dagdag pa dito kahit yung family ni rizal o yung mga taong malapit kay rizal ay hindi rin nila Nakita yong document ng retraction, so kung I aanalyze natin yung event dec 30, 1896 namatay si rizal and hindi na publicize yung retraction document kung sakaling nagkaroon nga ng retraction document si rizal until 1935 so anong nangyari nung mga times na namatay sya and then nung 1935 lang nailabas o yung nai publicize yung retraction document 3rd evidence that was presented is that no effort was made to save rizal from death penalty even after saying his execution right, so there’s a point. Kung talagang nag retract si rizal binawi na nya lahat ng sinabi nya against catholic church, binawi na rin nyam ga criticisms nya na sinabi sa Spanish government and sana hindi sya pinapatay or himdi natuloy yung kanyang death penalty kaya lang walang nangyaring ganun so medyo kataka taka din yung nangyari or cineclaim na retraction …………………………………………………………………… 4th evidence rizal’s death was kept in secret and nailibing sya outside the paco cemetery and ang nakahanap sa labi nya ay ang kanyang kapatid na si narcisa 2 days after ng kanyang execution. …………………………………………………………………… 5th evidence the record of his burial was not placed on the entrys of dec 30, 1896 but rather it was placed on special page so namaty sya ng dec 30 kaya lang dun sa record ng dec 30. 1896 hindi dun na indicate yung kanyang pagkamatay so nailagay sya sa special page so ang nagiung conclusion po naming who don’t believed that rizal retracted is either dinagdagan ng panibagong page para maisingit dun sa record According to Mr. MARCOS RIAL in his document argument that Rizal did not retract, sinasabi roon na Rizal did not died as a Roman Catholic because if he really retracted malamang talagang siya ay bibigyan ng proper and decent na libing, ngunit hindi ito naibigay sa kanya, he did not retract because he was buried in a ground, may isang tradisyon ang mga katoliko na bago ang libing ay magkakaroon ng isang misa para sa patay, at pagkatapos ng mis ana ito ay magkakaron ng maaayos na paglilibing. Ngunuit nung disyembre a trenta 1896, pagkatapos ng pagbitay sa ating pambansang bayani ang bangkay ni Rizal ay dinala sa San Juan De Dios Hospital at sa mismong araw na iyon ay inilibing ang labi ng ating pambansang bayani sa Paco Cemetery at sa isang walang markang libingan ang giving the idea that catholics are strict when it comes on their beliefs, dapat nagkaroon ng maayos na libing si Rizal ngunit wala gayundin ang misa na walang naganap held by catholics noong kanyang libing, Father Estanislao and Father Jose Villaclara accompanied rizal to the execution site ni hindi sila nagpa utos upang bigyan ng Christian burial siguro nung mga panahong iyon ay alam na din nila na walang rertraction na naganap …………………………………………………………………… 6th evidence, there is no marriage certificate or public record of rizal’s marriage to Josephine Bracken so walang Nakita na certificate na magpapatunay na kinasal nga sa simbahang katolika si Josephine at si Rizal. ………………………………………………………………….. 7th evidence rizal’s behavior did not point a conversion during his last 24 hours before his execution, so sa kanyang masterpiece na Mi Ultimo Adios at yung mga letters na binigay nya sa mga taong malalapit sa kanya especially sa kanyang family walang nagsasabi o nagpapatunay na sya ay nagbalik loob na. Last evidence the retraction itself is out of character, it is not accurate or incongruent sya and irrelevant sya don sa mga statement na nabanggit nya before regarding sa kanyang mga pananaw when it comes to religion