The document discusses the position of ACCFA regarding fringe benefits provided for in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). Specifically:
1) ACCFA argues that the fringe benefits have not become enforceable because they were subject to approval by the Office of the President, which approval was not obtained.
2) The CBA stated the fringe benefits would not take effect unless approved by the Board of Governors and the Office of the President.
3) The Supreme Court held that fringe benefits already paid could not be set aside, but no further benefits could be demanded since the unions had no right to bargain collectively.
The document discusses the position of ACCFA regarding fringe benefits provided for in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). Specifically:
1) ACCFA argues that the fringe benefits have not become enforceable because they were subject to approval by the Office of the President, which approval was not obtained.
2) The CBA stated the fringe benefits would not take effect unless approved by the Board of Governors and the Office of the President.
3) The Supreme Court held that fringe benefits already paid could not be set aside, but no further benefits could be demanded since the unions had no right to bargain collectively.
The document discusses the position of ACCFA regarding fringe benefits provided for in a collective bargaining agreement (CBA). Specifically:
1) ACCFA argues that the fringe benefits have not become enforceable because they were subject to approval by the Office of the President, which approval was not obtained.
2) The CBA stated the fringe benefits would not take effect unless approved by the Board of Governors and the Office of the President.
3) The Supreme Court held that fringe benefits already paid could not be set aside, but no further benefits could be demanded since the unions had no right to bargain collectively.
The position of the ACCFA in regard to the question of fringe benefits
provided for inthe CBA is that the said fringe benefits have not become enforceable because the condition that they should first be approved by the Office of the President has not been complied with. "Under Section 3, Article XIV, of the CBA, the same ""shall not become" effective unless and untilthe same is duly ratified by the Board of "Governors of the Administration "" Such approvalwas given even before the formal execution of the CBA but with the proviso that •the fringe benefit$ i;ontained ther""lin $hall talle effei;t only if approved by the office of the President• The condit onis," "therefore, deemed to be incorporated into the agreement by reference." "NOTE:On July 24, 1963 theACCFA Boardof Governors ratified the" "CBA but withthe express qualificationthat the same was ""without prejudice to the pending appeal in the Supreme Court....""The Office of Ille President approved the payment of Ille CBA's agreed upon fringe benefits." The Supreme Court held that insofar as the fringe benefits already paid "are concerned,there is no reason to set aside the decision of the CIR, but that since the respondent Unions have no right to the certification election sought by them nor,consequently,to bargain collectively with the petitioner,no further fringe benefits may be demanded on the basis of any collective bargaining agreement." The decisions and orders appealed from are set aside and/or modified inaccordance withthe foregoing pronouncements. No costs.