This document is an abstract for a research paper presented at the 3rd Student Research Symposium of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. The paper examines the balance between a state's margin of appreciation in ensuring national security and protecting human rights under Sri Lanka's Prevention of Terrorism Act. It discusses how the PTA has historically been used to victimize members of society and undermine civil liberties. The normative research analyzes the PTA using legislation, case law, and secondary sources to identify inconsistencies that both harm security and violate rights. It argues reforms are needed to uphold security in line with international human rights standards while safeguarding liberties.
This document is an abstract for a research paper presented at the 3rd Student Research Symposium of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. The paper examines the balance between a state's margin of appreciation in ensuring national security and protecting human rights under Sri Lanka's Prevention of Terrorism Act. It discusses how the PTA has historically been used to victimize members of society and undermine civil liberties. The normative research analyzes the PTA using legislation, case law, and secondary sources to identify inconsistencies that both harm security and violate rights. It argues reforms are needed to uphold security in line with international human rights standards while safeguarding liberties.
This document is an abstract for a research paper presented at the 3rd Student Research Symposium of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. The paper examines the balance between a state's margin of appreciation in ensuring national security and protecting human rights under Sri Lanka's Prevention of Terrorism Act. It discusses how the PTA has historically been used to victimize members of society and undermine civil liberties. The normative research analyzes the PTA using legislation, case law, and secondary sources to identify inconsistencies that both harm security and violate rights. It argues reforms are needed to uphold security in line with international human rights standards while safeguarding liberties.
This document is an abstract for a research paper presented at the 3rd Student Research Symposium of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences. The paper examines the balance between a state's margin of appreciation in ensuring national security and protecting human rights under Sri Lanka's Prevention of Terrorism Act. It discusses how the PTA has historically been used to victimize members of society and undermine civil liberties. The normative research analyzes the PTA using legislation, case law, and secondary sources to identify inconsistencies that both harm security and violate rights. It argues reforms are needed to uphold security in line with international human rights standards while safeguarding liberties.
Proceedings of the 3rd Student Research Symposium of the Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences (SRSHSS 2023)
The Balance Between Margin of Appreciation and Human Rights Protection
under Prevention of Terrorism Act
Dunuwille, D.C.H.1
Department of Legal Studies, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences,
The OpenUniversity of Sri Lanka
Abstract
Justice is a universal aspiration, and the feeling of injustice is a powerful human
emotion. However, injustice is essentially a conflict, and a society without justice as a governing principle is an unstable society bound together by some form of coercion. Moreover, Law and justice are subject to different interpretations over time, but no common standard has changed. That is, the diversity of justice does not always coincide with the consensus of Law and society. This research is a legal inquiry into the inextricable link between civil liberties, and their reconciliation with the security of the State. However, the purpose of the PTA is to ensure national security by combating terrorism. but historically, for decades, the PTA has been weaponized against civil liberties. This has resulted in the victimization of members of society. The paper reiterates that any process which seeks to tackle issues related to the PTA must address this factor to ensure those adversely affected by the law will receive justice, including reparations. The research is normative research which is primarily based on an extensive literature review and also research was carried out using the black letter approach of research using relevant legislations and judicial decisions as primary sources and books with critical analysis, journals, theses and electronic resources as secondary sources. The paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of the PTA. There are inconsistencies and loopholes in the Act itself which harm national security. The paper addresses the shortcomings accordingly, affirming the need to uphold national security in line with international standards and safeguard human rights.