Part B Peer Evaluation - 4%

DDWC 3723 - SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT
PEER EVALUATION RUBRIC

Computer Science & Services Department
UTMSPACE Kuala Lumpur
SUBMISSION DATE AND TIME :
GROUP NO. / PROJECT NAME :
STUDENT DETAILS CARRY MARK
STUDENT 1 NAME :
/5
ROLES :
STUDENT 2 NAME:
/5
ROLES :
STUDENT 3 NAME:
/5
ROLES :
STUDENT 4 NAME:
ROLES : /5
STUDENT 5 NAME:
/5
ROLES :
PEER ASSESSMENT COLLABORATION RUBRIC
CRITERIA /
MARKS
EXCELLENT - 4 GOOD - 3 AVERAGE - 2 FAILING - 1
Participated most of the time Participated but wasted time

Participated fully and was Did not participate, wasted time,
PARTICIPATION and was on task most of the regularly and/ or was rarely on
always on task in class. or worked on unrelated material.
time. task.
Assumed leadership in an
appropriate way when
necessary by helping the group Sometimes assumed Usually allowed others to Did not assume leadership or
LEADERSHIP stay on track, encouraging leadership in an appropriate assume leadership or often assumed it in a non-productive
group participation, posing way. dominated the group. manner.
solutions to problems, and
having a positive attitude.
Listened carefully to others’ Usually listened to others’ Sometimes did not listen to Did not listen to others and often
LISTENING
ideas. ideas. others’ ideas. interrupted them.
Occasionally offered
Offered detailed, constructive Offered constructive constructive feedback, but Did not offer constructive or useful
FEEDBACK
feedback when appropriate. feedback when appropriate. sometimes the comments were feedback.
inappropriate or not useful.
Usually treated others Sometimes treated others Often treated others

Treated others respectfully and
COOPERATION respectfully and shared the disrespectfully and/or did not disrespectfully and/or did not
shared the workload fairly.
workload fairly. share the workload fairly. share the workload fairly.
Usually completed assigned Did not complete most of the

Often did not complete
tasks on time and did not assigned tasks on time and often
TIME Completed assigned tasks on assigned tasks on time, and
hold up progress on the forced the group to make last-
MANAGEMENT time. often held up completion of the
newspaper because of minute adjustments and changes
newspaper.
incomplete work. to accommodate missing work.
LECTURER SUMMARY FOR PEER ASSESSMENT COLLABORATION
*MARK FILL BY LECTURER
NAME : NAME : NAME : NAME : NAME :

MARK GIVEN BY
GROUP MEMBER
STUDENT 1 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 2 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 3 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 4 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
AVERAGE SCORE / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
TOTAL /5 /5 /5 /5 /5
(AVERAGE / 24) * 5
STUDENT 1 : ________________________________________________________________________________________________
MATRIC NO. : _______________________________________ GROUP NO. : _____________________________________
Write the number of the description that fits each group members’ participation in the box under the collaboration skill. Include your own name
in the list at first column.
 4 - Group Member is functioning at a high level and does not need to improve.
 3 - Group Member is working well within the group but has a few areas, which could be improved.
 2 - Group Member is attempting to work well but needs to improve in some areas.
 1 - Group Member does not seem to be trying to work well with the group and needs to improve a great deal.
GROUP
MEMBER NAME
PARTICIPATION
LEADERSHIP
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
COOPERATION
TIME
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 2 : ________________________________________________________________________________________________
GROUP
MEMBER NAME
PARTICIPATION
LEADERSHIP
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
COOPERATION
TIME
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 3 : ________________________________________________________________________________________________
GROUP
MEMBER NAME
PARTICIPATION
LEADERSHIP
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
COOPERATION
TIME
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 4 : ________________________________________________________________________________________________
GROUP
MEMBER NAME
PARTICIPATION
LEADERSHIP
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
COOPERATION
TIME
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24
STUDENT 5 : ________________________________________________________________________________________________
GROUP
MEMBER NAME
PARTICIPATION
LEADERSHIP
LISTENING
FEEDBACK
COOPERATION
TIME
MANAGEMENT
TOTAL / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24 / 24

Part B Peer Evaluation - 4%

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Part B Peer Evaluation - 4%

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

DDWC 3723 - SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

PEER EVALUATION RUBRIC

SUBMISSION DATE AND TIME :

GROUP NO. / PROJECT NAME :

STUDENT DETAILS CARRY MARK

Participated most of the time Participated but wasted time

Usually treated others Sometimes treated others Often treated others

Usually completed assigned Did not complete most of the

*MARK FILL BY LECTURER

NAME : NAME : NAME : NAME : NAME :

MATRIC NO. : ___ GROUP NO. : _

MATRIC NO. : ___ GROUP NO. : _

MATRIC NO. : ___ GROUP NO. : _

MATRIC NO. : ___ GROUP NO. : _

MATRIC NO. : ___ GROUP NO. : _

You might also like