Name : Muhammad Aiman Fitri

Student ID : 1200903188

Introduction
Support vessels must launch, recover, and operate ROVs safely and effectively in order for
them to be deployed from the surface. LARS, the Launch and Recovery System and TMS or
known as the Tether Management System, are the two systems required to effectively launch,
recover, and operate a ROV. ROVs can be launched straight from a simple crane, however, due
to the crane's large weight and the swinging motion of the vessel while the WCROV is hanging
between the launch point on deck and the insertion site in the splash zone, there is a significant
danger of damage.

Although an A-frame is the most typical component of a ROV launch and recovery system,
LARS systems can also be built from a heavy-duty crane with heavy compensation. The ROV
may be launched using the LARS systems from a ship's sides, stern, or internal moon pool. For
deepwater operations, the majority of Work Class ROVs utilized by the oil and gas sector come
with at least one video camera and lighting. One or more sonars, a camera, a manipulator or
cutting arm, and a variety of samples and tooling choices are other pieces of equipment. A
tether management system (TMS) enables the WCROV to be deployed to depth using a strong
and heavy umbilical cable and then flown out from the TMS using a lighter, more flexible cable
when bigger systems are employed in currents, which may vary in intensity and direction in
various depths. The ROV load transforms into a "wreckers ball" once the deployment of TMS is
hauled from a vessel's deck and through to the splash zone. The swing of the cargo might
become rather dangerous in high sea conditions. The lock latch or docking head is the solution
to this issue. While reducing the motion of the load with hydraulic or pneumatic accumulators
along the different axis of sway, this device captures the TMS at its connection point to the
umbilical and retains it in position against the A-frame.

Problem statement
The supervisor's problem is laziness and not caring about the consequences that will come after
the supervisor attempts to lower the 'A' frame with his own perceived method, the supervisor
also did not listen to the ROV team that had mentioned. has caused a collapse and pushed the
supervisor and got serious injuries on his lower body. There are also some effects that we can
imagine, for example, a worker's carelessness can be injured due to being hit by a sharp corner,
or stuck between moving parts, in fact, it can be worse if the worker does not perform
maintenance checkups periodically.
 1. Hazard identification 2. Risk assessment 3. Risk control

No. Work activity Hazard Cause / Effect Likelihood Severity Risk Recommendation control

1 Moving ROV Sharp edges cause cuts and 3 2 6 Use PPE provided.
Put a cover at the part
nearby, severe injuries needed.
sharp-pointed
parts

2 Moving ROV between parts cause shearing, 3 3 9 Use PPE provided suck as a
safety glove.
moving together be crushed Put a cover at the part
needed.
Initial training

3 Moving ROV moving parts of struck and 3 2 6 Use PPE provided such as
safety gloves.
machinery, injured Initial training
between pulley
drives

4 Unstable LARS Fall of object Head injury, fatal 2 4 8 Use provided PPE like a
A-frame crane safety helmet.
Do frequent maintenance
checkups.

5 Machine tripping, electric property 1 5 5 Redesigns the process can

breakdown shock, fire damage. be worked to make safer.
Injury to a Do frequent maintenance
worker, cause checkups
fatal
Conclusion,
Therefore, the worker must not take this matter for granted because this trivial matter can also
have severe effects, such as a head injury. For more experienced workers, you must always
obey the conditions, even if they seem trivial, or be willing to break the rules just to catch up with
time because if an accident happens, it is bad or maybe worse than we think, such as a
maintenance checkup that has not been done for a long time that can cause a machine
breakdown.