Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fate of The Fecal Indicator Escherichia Coli in Irrigation With Partially Treated Wastewater.
Fate of The Fecal Indicator Escherichia Coli in Irrigation With Partially Treated Wastewater.
Fate of the fecal indicator Escherichia coli in irrigation with partially treated
wastewater
PII: S0043-1354(15)30152-4
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.001
Reference: WR 11448
Please cite this article as: Vergine, P., Saliba, R., Salerno, C., Laera, G., Berardi, G., Pollice, A., Fate of
the fecal indicator Escherichia coli in irrigation with partially treated wastewater, Water Research (2015),
doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2015.08.001.
This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to
our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo
copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please
note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all
legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
1 Fate of the fecal indicator Escherichia coli in irrigation with partially treated wastewater
PT
*
6 email: pollice@irsa.cnr.it
7 Abstract
RI
8 Treated wastewater reuse is increasing in semi-arid regions as a response to the effects of climate
SC
9 change and increased competition for natural water resources. Investigating the fate of bacterial indicators
10 is relevant to assess their persistence in the environment and possible transfer to groundwater or to the
U
11 food chain. A long-term field-scale experimental campaign and a soil column test were carried out to
12 evaluate the fate of the fecal indicator Escherichia coli (E. coli) in a cultivated soil when contaminated
AN
13 water resources are used for irrigation. For field experiments, fecal contamination was simulated by
14 dosing the indicator to the effluent of a membrane bioreactor, thus simulating a filtration system’s failure,
M
15 and irrigating a test field where grass was grown. The presence of E. coli on grass and topsoil samples
16
D
was monitored under different scenarios. For evaluating the fate of the same indicator in the subsoil, a set
17 of soil columns was installed next to the field, operated, and monitored for E. coli concentration over time
TE
18 and along depth. Real municipal wastewater was used in this case as source of fecal contamination.
19 Results showed that short- and medium-term effects on topsoil were strongly dependent on the
EP
20 concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water. Limited persistence and no relevant accumulation of the
21 indicator on the grass and in the topsoil were observed. Watering events performed after fecal
C
22 contamination did not influence significantly the decay in the topsoil, which followed a log-linear model.
AC
23 The trend of the E. coli concentrations in the leaching of the soil columns followed a log-linear model as
24 well, suggesting bacterial decay as the dominant mechanism affecting the underground indicator’s
25 concentration.
26
27 Keywords: Water reuse; Escherichia coli; Irrigation; Agricultural soil; Wastewater; Fecal
28 contamination.
1
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
29
30 1. Introduction
31 Water stress in semi-arid areas calls for solutions that should promptly provide responses to
32 the effects of climate change and consequent decrease of available resources. Two approaches
33 to be combined in order to properly tackle water scarcity include (i) the improvement of
PT
34 resource management practices by balancing demand and supply, and (ii) the adoption of
35 alternative water resources (e.g. desalination, wastewater reuse, rainwater harvesting, etc.)
RI
36 (GWP, 2012). Water quality and the impairment of rivers, streams, groundwater and soils is a
SC
37 direct menace to the livelihood of growing populations. According to USEPA (2008), the major
38 cause of impairment of rivers and streams is excessive levels of pathogen bacteria. In temperate
U
39 climates, peak irrigation demand generally coincides with the time at which surface water
AN
40 systems are at their greatest risk for microbial contamination (Jamieson et al., 2003). To
41 mitigate the effects of soil water deficits, producers of high value crops may be forced to use
M
42 water containing indicator organisms exceeding recommended levels (Wood et al., 2010).
43 Countries facing the Mediterranean Sea have different priorities and constraints with respect
D
44 to the improvement of freshwater availability, and also different regulations governing treated
TE
45 wastewater reuse (Kellis et al., 2013). With specific reference to the hygienic safety of treated
46 effluents, most national regulations base their approach on one of the two guidelines for
EP
47 wastewater reuse proposed by the WHO and the State of California, respectively (WHO, 1989;
48 State of California, 1978). These two guidelines include different requirements and indications
C
49 towards the quality of effluents that can be used for irrigation, and in particular they set the
AC
50 limits of 1000 fecal coliforms per 100 mL and 2.2 total coliforms (MPN) per 100 mL,
51 respectively. The adoption of one of these two approaches implies very different requirements
52 in terms of treatment technologies, which reflect on the costs of produced water, and finally
53 determine the sustainable applicability of treated wastewater reuse in the different countries.
54 Therefore the knowledge of the real persistence of the fecal contamination in the environment is
2
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
55 a crucial aspect in order to evaluate the appropriateness of current standards for wastewater
56 reuse in agriculture.
57 When cultivated fields are irrigated with fully or partially treated municipal wastewater, the
58 highest risk for human health occurs in the short-term period. Then, natural processes (die-off,
59 solar disinfection, rain, and transfer to the lower layers) progressively reduce the presence of
PT
60 pathogenic organisms in the topsoil and on the vegetables, but at the same time may cause
61 contamination of subsurface water resources (Sjorgen, 1995; Naclerio et al., 2009). The possible
RI
62 persistence of fecal contamination in soil depends on its characteristics, moisture content and on
SC
63 the origin of the fecal contamination itself (i.e. waste type) (Lang and Smith 2007). However,
64 the knowledge of processes affecting persistence and the movement of fecal contamination
U
65 through the soil is still scarce. In this context, the identification of suitable indicators of fecal
AN
66 contamination is also critical. The enteric bacterium Escherichia coli (E. coli) is normally
67 considered a good and specific indicator of this type of contamination, and it is adopted in most
M
68 European regulations as a basic tool to assess the microbiological quality of treated municipal
69 wastewater (Kellis et al., 2013). Indeed it represents an easily detectable indicator of the
D
71 diarrhea to the deadly hemolytic uremic syndrome, which affects humans of all ages (Paton and
72 Paton, 1998). Moreover, E. coli does not duplicate appreciably outside of its natural habitat,
EP
73 therefore in non-enteric environments its population rapidly tends to decrease after an event of
74 fecal contamination (Odonkor and Ampofo, 2013). The survival period of enteric bacteria in
C
75 general, and E. coli in particular, in the soil is influenced by various soil and environmental
AC
76 variables, such as soil texture, organic matter, pH, temperature, moisture content and nutrients
77 (Semenov et al., 2008). Under field conditions, solar radiation, temperature and dryness may
78 also affect the survival of fecal indicators (Oliveira et al., 2012). According to Oliveira and
79 coworkers (2012) environmental factors play a big role in the determination of the survival time
80 in soil samples. While mobilization represents the dominant factor influencing the fecal
81 microbial dynamics in streams and rivers (McDonald et al., 1982; Hunter et al., 1992), many
3
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
82 research outcomes highlighted the importance of die-off of the fecal indicator as the key process
84 In Apulia (South East Italy), a region whose economy is based on agriculture, the combination
85 of dry weather conditions, absence of permanent rivers and natural lakes, and progressive
PT
87 2006). Several activities were carried out over the last decades to test and demonstrate the
RI
89 continuous water availability during the dry season (e.g. agriculture) (Bixio et al., 2006). In
SC
90 particular, previous experimental activities have shown the long term feasibility of adopting
91 tertiary membrane filtration as a suitable tool for the upgrade of municipal effluents to comply
U
92 with the stringent local standards for reuse (Pollice et al., 2004; Lopez et al., 2010). However, in
AN
93 the presence of membrane failures, bacterial post-contamination/regrowth in storage basins or
94 ineffective disinfection, a relevant fecal contamination may be transferred to the cultivated soil
M
95 through irrigation.
96 Aim of this work is to identify the main factors that affect the fecal contamination of a
D
97 cultivated soil (and the underlying groundwater) irrigated with partially treated wastewater.
TE
98 Results are reported of a field-scale experimental campaign and a soil column test aimed at
99 assessing the fate of E. coli when water containing high concentrations of this indicator is used
EP
100 for irrigation. The short-term effects of a single contamination event on topsoil (first 10 cm) and
101 grass were firstly investigated at the field-scale. Then, the potential accumulation of a series of
C
102 contamination events, and the persistence of E. coli after the contamination were also studied.
AC
103 Finally, the potential migration of the target bacteria through the lower soil layers was evaluated
105
4
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
108 A small experimental field was cultivated with grass (Paspalum vaginatum) and divided into
109 two identical plots, defined as control plot and test plot. Plots had dimensions of 4x4 m each,
110 were separated by a 2 m wide aisle paved with plastic blocks, and were equipped with 4
111 sprinklers placed in the corners and oriented towards the center of the plot. A waterproof curtain
112 having height of 1.2 m was also placed between the two plots to prevent cross-contamination in
PT
113 case of wind. The control plot was irrigated with tap water, while the test plot was irrigated with
114 the effluent of a pilot scale membrane bioreactor (MBR) placed next to the field and operated
RI
115 for organic carbon removal and nitrification of a synthetic municipal wastewater. The main
116 characteristics of both tap water and MBR effluent are reported in Table 1. Before being used
SC
117 for irrigating the test plot, the MBR effluent went continuously into a 480 L reservoir and the
118 overflow was discharged. Inocula of E. coli were spiked into the reservoir to simulate various
119
U
scenarios of fecal contamination. Therefore the level of E. coli in the irrigation water varied
AN
120 along the experiment. Table 1 also shows the characteristic of the raw wastewater used for the
121 soil column test described in section 2.2. Inocula of E. coli were prepared by dissolving E. coli
M
122 pellet (ATCC® 25922TM, Liofilchem) in a Lysogeny broth (10 g of tryptone, 5 g of yeast extract
D
123 and 5 g of sodium chloride in 1 L of distilled water, autoclaved at 121 °C for 15 min) and
TE
125 The soil was made of sand (49%), silt (26%) and clay (25%) and corresponded to a sandy clay
EP
126 loam in the USDA classification (USDA, 1987). Water content at saturation, field capacity and
127 permanent wilting point were determined using the Saxton pedotransfer function (Saxton et al.,
C
128 1986) and their values were 43%, 28% and 16%, respectively.
AC
129 Several field experiments were performed during an overall experimental period of
130 approximately one year. Average specific irrigation volume was 9.7 (±0.9) mm and the watering
131 events were scheduled in relation to the soil water deficit in the root zone. The latter, estimated
132 according to evapotranspiration criterion, was approximately 35% of the total available water.
133 In practice, irrigations were performed daily during the warmer season (May 1st to September
134 30th) and three times per week during the rest of the year. Climate variables were measured by a
5
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
135 weather station installed next to the field (Associazione Consorzi di Difesa della Puglia,
136 www.agrometeopuglia.it). The average temperature in the topsoil (first 10 cm) was 25.2 (±3.6)
137 °C during the warmer season and 13.0 (±4.9) °C during the rest of the year. The total rainfall
139 As a consequence of the continuous transition of the MBR effluent through the reservoir and
PT
140 the natural die-off of E. coli, the concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water used for the test
141 plot varied as follows: it had a peak after each E. coli addition and then decreased by about half
RI
142 order of magnitude every day until the subsequent addition. The following types of fecal
SC
143 contamination scenarios were simulated:
144 a. Multiple irrigation events with decreasing fecal contamination. It consisted in a single
U
145 spike of E. coli into the reservoir, followed by several irrigations with decreasing
AN
146 concentration of E. coli. The concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass were
147 measured five hours after the first irrigation following the spike. This scenario simulated
M
148 the failure of the MBR filtration system, repaired after one day.
149 b. Multiple irrigation events with constant fecal contamination. It consisted in a series of
D
150 daily spikes of E. coli into the reservoir, in order to have an approximately constant
TE
151 concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water during a period of 7 days. The
152 concentration of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass was measured five hours after the
EP
153 first and the last irrigation of the series. This scenario simulated the failure of the filtration
154 system, repaired after one week. It allowed the evaluation of the potential accumulation or
C
156 c. Single irrigation event and dry monitoring. It consisted in performing a single irrigation
157 after the spike of E. coli into the reservoir and measuring the concentrations of E. coli in
158 the topsoil and on the grass five hours after the watering event. Then the irrigation of the
159 test plot was stopped and the presence of E. coli in topsoil and on the grass was monitored
160 four times per week. This scenario allowed the study of the survival of E. coli after a
6
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
162 In order to avoid accumulation effects on soil and grass, sufficient time was left between the
163 end of a contamination test and the beginning of a new one. The concentration of E. coli in the
164 topsoil and on the grass was monitored, and a new test was started only when these were below
165 1 CFU/g. No rain events occurred during any of the tests performed, but only between different
166 tests.
PT
167
RI
168 2.2 Soil column experiment
169 Twelve identical soil columns were set-up and drip-irrigated with identical water volumes and
SC
170 frequency. Soil samples were collected along the experiment. Each sampling was performed in
171 a different column and corresponded to its destruction (Hekman et al., 1994). This procedure
172
U
allowed to consider all the soil samples as belonging to a unique column and was chosen to
AN
173 avoid the disturbance that sampling would have had on the transport of E. coli through the soil,
174 if a single column was used for multiple sampling. Soil columns consisted of cylindrical
M
175 containers of 16 L volume (diameter: 23 cm; height: 40 cm), with undulated walls (ring-like
D
176 with amplitude of 5 mm and wavelength of 25 mm) to minimize preferential water flows along
177 the column’s edge (Corwin, 2000). The columns were packed with 19.26 (±0.03) kg of soil for a
TE
178 depth of 36 cm and were installed vertically on a steel structure and separated by a distance of
179 50 cm between each other. To reduce the lateral heating and possibly simulate an in-situ
EP
180 situation, each column was wrapped in aluminum foil and the whole set was protected with a
C
181 lateral curtain for shielding from wind and direct sunlight. A porous cylinder, 40 cm long and 2
AC
182 cm wide, was stuck in the center of one of the columns to allow the use of a soil moisture probe
183 (PR2, Delta-T). The outflow (percolated water) was collected from the bottom of each column
185 Columns were filled with soil extracted close to the control plot used in field experiments, the
186 profile of which was reproduced by the separation of every 12 cm layer before filling the
187 columns. To allow for the compaction of the soil, prior to the start of the experiment soil
7
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
188 columns were irrigated with tap water for one month, during which overall irrigation and
190 The experiment took place outside, during the warmer season (from May 13th to June 24th).
191 The specific irrigation volumes applied are presented in Figure 1, together with the climate
192 variables, measured by a weather station installed in a field next to the columns. The average
PT
193 temperatures in the topsoil (first 10 cm) and the subsoil (from 10 to 36 cm depth) were 21.7
194 (±2.7) °C and 21.0 (±2.4) °C, respectively. The average values of soil water content were 0.20
RI
195 (±0.04) m3/m3 and 0.28 (±0.05) m3/m3 for topsoil and subsoil, respectively. Irrigation volumes,
SC
196 higher than in the field experiments, were chosen in order to emphasize the potential downward
U
198 The pollution scenario consisted of a single fecal contamination event, which simulated a
AN
199 sewage spill or a supplemental irrigation with raw wastewater, and subsequent irrigations with
200 conventional water (tap water). Initially the soil columns were irrigated with 48 mm of raw
M
201 wastewater, taken from a local municipal wastewater treatment plant. For one of the columns, 2
202 gNaCl/L were dissolved in the wastewater to allow the comparative study of the transport of E.
D
203 coli and salt through the soil. The main characteristics of both raw wastewater and tap water are
TE
204 reported in Table 1. The salt addition increased the electrical conductivity of the wastewater
205 from 1020 µS/cm to 4270 µS/cm, without influencing significantly the concentration of E. coli,
EP
206 which are tolerant to salt at concentrations up to 50 gNaCl/L or more (Hrenovic and Ivankovic,
The concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil, the subsoil and outflow were monitored along the
AC
208
209 experiment. Soil samples were collected at days 0, 1, 6 8, 14, 22 and 42. At both days 8 and 14
210 two samplings were performed, one before and one after the watering event. One column was
211 destroyed every soil sampling, meaning that after the sampling the column was not used for the
212 experiment anymore. For two of the columns, one of which corresponding to the sodium
213 chloride addition during the pollution event, samples of outflow were collected after each
214 irrigation until the specific percolating flow was lower than 0.01 mm/d. The frequency of the
8
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
215 outflow sampling was proportional to the speed of the percolating flow (about every 10 min
216 during the first hour, every 30 min during the second hour and then another two-three samples
218
PT
220 Samples of grass were collected by cutting bundles of leaves, and were immediately carried to
RI
221 the lab. In field experiments, homogeneity of soil and grass samples with respect to irrigation
222 was optimized by collecting the samples from the center of the plots, in the zone reached by
SC
223 water coming from all the 4 sprinklers. For the soil column experiment, each soil layer was
225
U
Analyses of pH, electrical conductivity (EC), chemical oxygen demand (COD), suspended
AN
226 solids (SS), total nitrogen, ammonia, nitrite, nitrate and phosphate were performed according to
227 Standard Methods (APHA, 2005). The content of sodium chloride in the outflow of the soil
M
228 column that underwent the sodium chloride addition was estimated by measuring the electrical
D
229 conductivity.
TE
230 For the enumeration of E. coli, water samples were filtered through 0.45 µm nitrocellulose
231 membranes, then the membranes were placed on TBX (Tryptone Bile X-glucuronide) agar and
EP
232 incubated at 37◦C for 24 h. To extract the bacteria from soil and grass samples, 10 g of each
233 sample were dispersed in 100 mL of sterile water and centrifuged at 1000 rpm; then the
C
234 supernatant was analyzed for E. coli. Comparative analyses (plate counts) of E. coli on soil
AC
235 samples (500 g) spiked with wastewater (50 mL) at different concentrations and on samples of
236 the same wastewater confirmed satisfactory recovery of bacteria from soil (> 70%).
237
239 3.1 Occurrence of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass (field experiments)
9
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
240 3.1.1 Background concentrations
241 During the field experiments, the existence of a source of microbiological contamination
242 (animal feces) different from the irrigation water was noticed. Its effect was more pronounced
243 on grass than on topsoil. The presence of E. coli was detected in 12% (3/26) of topsoil samples
244 and 23% (7/31) of grass samples irrigated with tap water (having concentration of E. coli<1
PT
245 CFU/100mL). These results are in agreement with Forslund et al. (2010; 2012) and Lang and
246 Smith (2007), which observed the presence of E. coli in samples of control soil (i.e., soil not
RI
247 exposed to irrigation water or amendment containing fecal contamination) and argued that other
SC
248 environmental fecal contamination sources, like wild animals and birds, could have caused it.
249 Généreux et al. (2015) also detected E. coli on strawberry fruits before the irrigation with
U
250 contaminated water. Considering only the values beyond the detection limit (1 CFU/g), the
AN
251 average concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass in the control plot were 4 (±2)
252 CFU/g and 51 (±65) CFU/g, respectively. Results of the present study confirm that it is not
M
253 possible to consider the background concentrations of E. coli as zero in a cultivated field. This
254 aspect should be taken into account when planning standard limits for treated wastewater reuse
D
255 in agriculture.
TE
256
258 To evaluate the short-term effects of a single pollution event, for each scenario applied during
C
259 the field experiments, the concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil (E. colits) and on the grass (E.
AC
260 colig) were measured five hours after the initial pollution event. Results are displayed in Error!
261 Reference source not found. versus the concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water (E.
262 coliw) and refer to a specific irrigation volume of 9.7 (±0.9) mm. One irrigation with water
263 containing up to 70 CFU/100mL of E. coli did not produce a detectable presence of E. coli in
264 the topsoil, neither on the grass (E. coli<1 CFU/g). On the contrary, a considerable occurrence
10
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
265 of E. coli was always observed both in the topsoil and on the grass when irrigating with water
267 Figure 2 shows the concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil (first 10 cm, Figure 2A) and on the
268 grass (Figure 2B), observed five hours after each pollution event, versus the concentration of E.
269 coli in the irrigation water. E. colits was observed to increase with E. coliw according to a linear
PT
270 relationship between the common logarithms of the two variables:
RI
272 with R2=0.858 and p-value<0.001 for F-test for regression, which means that a power-law curve
SC
273 fits the observed values (E. colits=0.0036·E. coliw0.733). On the contrary, Forslund and coworkers
274 (2012) found a weak association between the concentrations of E. coli in the irrigation water
275
U
and in the irrigated soil. However, in their case the collection of soil samples did not occur
AN
276 always on the day of irrigation and the range of concentrations of E. coli in the irrigation water
277 that they tested was lower and smaller than in the present study, thus a greater influence of
M
278 external contaminations may be expected. The power coefficient (0.733) lower than 1 indicates
279 that the percentage of the E. coli transferred with the irrigation that was retained in the topsoil
D
280 decreased for increasing values of E. coliw, thus suggesting that also in the subsoil the spreading
TE
281 of E. coli depends on the concentration in water. One observation performed during soil column
282 experiment (SC) is also reported in Figure 2A. The concentration of E. coli in the topsoil after
EP
283 the pollution event could have been approximately estimated using field experiments results,
C
284 despite the higher specific irrigation volume applied (48 mm) in soil column experiments. This
fact, together with the existence of the power relationship in Figure 2A itself, highlights the
AC
285
286 preeminence of the concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water over the other factors (such as
287 temperature and amount of water irrigated) that are known to influence the retention of E. coli
288 in the soil after a pollution event. On the contrary, the values of E. colig observed five hours
289 after the pollution events did not show any correlation with the values of E. coliw (Figure 2B). In
290 this case, other factors, like temperature, solar radiation or other sources of contamination, had
11
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
292
294 The potential accumulation of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass due to a series of
295 pollution events was investigated in field experiments by irrigating with an approximately
296 constant value of E. coliw during a period of seven days (scenario b. Multiple irrigation events
PT
297 with constant fecal contamination). Table 2 shows the results of the three series of seven daily
298 irrigations, 9.7(±0.4) mm each, performed with approximately constant E. coliw. The
RI
299 concentration of E. coli in the first 10 cm of soil (E. colits) and on the grass (E. colig) was
SC
300 measured five hours after the first and the last irrigation of each series. As it can be seen from
301 results of run 1 reported in Table 2, medium-term effects of irrigating with water containing on
U
302 average 89 (±49) CFU/100mL of E. coli were not detectable for both topsoil and grass. For the
AN
303 other two runs, the values of E. colits generated by each series of seven pollution events were
304 slightly higher than those observed after the first event of the series, suggesting very limited
M
305 accumulation under the tested conditions. These preliminary results suggest that in the first 10
306 cm of soil other phenomena, such as the natural die-off and the movement to the subsoil,
D
307 drastically contrasted the effects of both accumulation and possible re-growth of E. coli. As for
TE
308 the grass, where also solar radiation may have had a relevant effect, no accumulation was
309 observed.
EP
310
C
313 The persistence of E. coli in the experimental field after a fecal contamination event was firstly
314 investigated under dry conditions, i.e., with no irrigation and no rain (scenario c. Single
315 irrigation event and dry monitoring). Under these conditions, the possible movement of E. coli
316 to the subsoil is strongly limited, thus the disappearance of E. coli from topsoil occurs mainly
317 for the natural die-off. After the pollution event (specific irrigation volume of 10 mm, E. coliw
12
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
318 of 5.0E06 CFU/100mL), the concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil and on the grass were
319 monitored until both reached values below1 CFU/g. Results are presented in Figure 3. The
320 survival rate was much lower on the grass than in the topsoil. In the first two days after the fecal
321 contamination event, the concentration of E. coli on the grass decreased by more than two
322 orders of magnitude. During the same period, the reduction observed in the topsoil was less than
PT
323 half order of magnitude. Assuming the absence of E. coli for values below 1 CFU/g, the
324 survival time of E. coli was between 10 and 13 days in the topsoil and between 3 and 6 days on
RI
325 the grass. Compared with the latter, a similar result (i.e., survival time lower than 7 days) is
326 reported for the pathogenic bacteria E. coli 0157:H7 on lettuce (Moyne et al., 2011). A very low
SC
327 persistence of E. coli on plants was also observed by Généreux et al (2015), which monitored
328 the presence of E. coli on strawberry irrigated with naturally contaminated water. However the
329
U
survival time of specific E. coli strains on plants may be much longer, as shown by the two
AN
330 months survival of E. coli 0128:B12 on grass (Sjorgen, 1995).
M
331 The mortality of E. coli observed in topsoil can be described by a log-linear model (log10(E.
332 colits)=3.7-0.248·d, with d=number of days from the pollution event and R2 of 0.971). Also the
D
333 mortality of E. coli on the grass seemed to follow the same type of trend. However, in this case,
TE
334 the limited number of observations higher than 1 CFU/g was considered not to be statistically
336
C
338 The study of the persistence of E. coli in the topsoil and in the subsoil in the presence of rain
339 and irrigation was conducted within the soil column experiment. After the pollution event, the
340 concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil, the subsoil and in the outflows collected at the bottom of
341 the soil columns were monitored until all reached values below the detection limit (1 CFU/g for
342 soil samples, 1 CFU/100 mL for water samples). Between day zero and day 14, the mortality of
343 E. coli in the topsoil (Figure 4) followed a log-linear model (log10(E. colits)=4.7-0.249·d, with R2
13
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
344 of 0.991), the slope of which is very close to the one found for the mortality in the topsoil under
345 dry conditions (Figure 3). This indicates that, compared with the effect of the natural die-off, the
346 overall effect of the watering events of day 3 and day 8 on the persistence of E. coli in the
348 After 14 days from the pollution event, the concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil and in the
PT
349 subsoil reached values of 1 CFU/g or lower. Nevertheless, a detectable presence of E. coli in the
350 outflows was observed for longer. This means that values of E. coli in the soil lower than 1
RI
351 CFU/g have still to be considered with regards to the potential leaching to groundwater.
SC
352 The mortality of E. coli in the topsoil after day 14 may have followed a different pattern from
353 the one observed until day 14. Indeed, the values of E. colits are compatible with a two-stage
U
354 log-linear decay and with a Weibull survival model (a parametric survival model where the
AN
355 survival time is assumed to follow a Weibull distribution) as well. Both of these models were
356 successfully used in previous studies to describe the mortality of specific strains of E. coli (E.
M
357 coli NAR and E. coli O157:H7) and of Fecal coliforms (Zhai et al., 1995; Franz et al., 2008;
358 Semenov et al. 2011; Farhangi et al., 2013). The possibility that the decay rate in the topsoil
D
359 decreased in the second part of the experiment is supported by the die-off of E. coli observed in
TE
360 a sample of the wastewater used for the pollution event that was stored in the lab at 20.2 (± 1.5)
361 °C (Figure 4, “bottle”). In this case, a two-stage log-linear decay fitted the observed values of E.
EP
362 coli concentrations in the wastewater (E. colib): log10(E. colib)=7.2-0.258·d for d≤7 (R2 of 0.997)
363 and log10(E. colib)=5.4-0.049·d for d≥7 (R2 of 0.945). Blaustein and coworkers (2013) recently
C
364 reported that this kind of pattern, i.e. a fast mortality followed by a slow mortality, is the most
AC
365 prevalent among 170 datasets of E. coli survival in water found in the literature.
366
367 3.3 Transport of E. coli through the soil (soil column experiment)
368 Comparing the concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil and in the subsoil, there was no
369 evidence of a continuous movement downward of E. coli from the topsoil to the underlying
14
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
370 layers during the experiment. A small movement downward seemed to occur only in
371 correspondence to the irrigations, as suggested by the increase of the concentration of E. coli in
372 the subsoil (E. coliss) observed after the irrigation performed at day 8 (Figure 4).
373 In correspondence to all the irrigations performed (including the pollution event), a relevant
374 presence of E. coli was found in the percolated water. The leaching of water from the soil
PT
375 columns started about 20 minutes after the beginning of each irrigation and ended (i.e., specific
376 percolating flow lower than 0.01 mm/d) after about 24 hours. However, the leaching of E. coli
RI
377 practically ended after five hours from the beginning of each irrigation, when more than 99.8 %
SC
378 of the amount of E. coli collected after 24 hours had already leached out. After the pollution
379 event (48 mm, 2.E+07 CFU/100mL), the load of E. coli that would have reached a groundwater
U
380 table situated at a depth of 36 cm was 2.E+07 CFU/m2 (29 mm, 8.E+04 CFU/100mL), which
AN
381 corresponded to less than 1% of the amount of E. coli supplied with the irrigation. Due to the
382 natural die-off of E. coli in the soil, the leaching of E. coli decreased at every watering event
M
383 and, compared with the leaching generated by the pollution event, it was already one order of
385 The concentration of E. coli in the leaching water that reaches the groundwater table
TE
386 (supposed to be at a depth of 36 cm) depends on several parameters, such as the die-off rate, the
387 leaching coefficient, soil porosity and the natural movement of E. coli through the soil. Even if
EP
388 these parameters can vary over time and were not individually determined in this study, it was
389 observed that the overall trend of the E. coli concentrations in the leaching water (Figure 4) may
C
390 be described by a log-linear model. Indeed, the concentration of E. coli in both outflows (E.
AC
391 coliout1 and E. coliout2) followed log-linear models (log10(E. coliout1)=4.9-0.130·d, with R2 of
392 0.996; log10(E. coliout2)=4.6-0.136·d, with R2 of 0.995). The same pattern was observed by
393 Gagliardi and Karns (2000) for the E. coli O157:07 in the leaching of various types of soils
395 During the five hours following the pollution event and the other irrigations performed during
396 the soil column experiment, samples of the outflow of the soil column that underwent the
15
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
397 addition of sodium chloride were collected, and the cumulative amounts of water, salt and E.
398 coli in the outflow were determined (see Table 3). For each parameter, the cumulative
399 percentage collected in the outflow over time was determined and displayed in Figure 5. After
400 about one hour from the beginning of each irrigation, when approximately half of the total
401 amount of water that will be collected after five hours had been drained, the flow dropped
PT
402 significantly. Simultaneously, the percolation of both salt and E. coli decreased too. This result
403 indicates that under transient flow the transport of both salt and E. coli depended on the flow
RI
404 passing through the column and confirms the results reported by Shang and coworkers (2009),
405 who showed that the drainage induces the mobility of irregularly shaped particles with diameter
SC
406 < 2µm, as E. coli.
U
407 Comparing the behavior of salt and E. coli, the latter showed a stronger affinity with the soil.
AN
408 Indeed, as it can be seen from Figure 5, for each irrigation the curve representing the cumulative
409 percentage of E. coli in the outflow overlied the curve representing the cumulative percentage of
M
410 salt. This information may be useful for modeling the transport of E. coli through a sandy clay
411 loam soil by integrating data of tracer tests, performed with salt, with measurements of E. coli.
D
412
TE
413 4. Conclusions
EP
414 Field and soil column experiments were carried out in Apulia (South East Italy) in order to
415 investigate the fate of the fecal contamination indicator E. coli present in relevant concentrations
C
416 in water used for irrigation. The following conclusions can be drawn for a sandy clay loam soil
AC
418 • The main factors affecting the contamination of soil irrigated with partially treated
419 wastewater are: (i) the concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water and (ii) the natural dye-
420 off of E. coli. The first mainly influences the extent of contamination in the short-term
421 period. The second is the dominant process affecting the persistence of E. coli in the topsoil
422 and the level of contamination of the water leaching through the soil column. A power
16
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
423 relationship was found between the concentration of E. coli in the irrigation water and in the
424 topsoil (first 10 cm), as measured five hours after a single contamination event. Persistence
425 of E. coli in the topsoil after a pollution event followed a log-linear model (dye-off rate of
426 0.25 d-1) both under dry conditions and in the presence of rain and irrigations.
427 • In terms of potential contamination of subsurface water resources, less than 1% of the
PT
428 amount of E. coli present in the irrigation water passed through a 36 cm deep soil column
429 after the pollution event (48 mm; 2.E+07 CFU/100mL of E. coli).
RI
430 • When several watering events followed a pollution event, the overall trend of the E. coli
431 concentrations in the leaching water (at 36 cm depth) was described by a log-linear model.
SC
432 • Under the tested conditions, total disappearance of the E. coli in the leaching water was
U
433 observed after 35-40 days. AN
434 The behavior of E. coli in topsoil and subsoil can be useful for evaluating the environmental
436 standards. Further research is required to investigate the dynamics of other microbiological
437 pollution indicators in order to gain a more detailed picture and assure safer and more efficient
D
439
Acknowledgements
EP
440
441 The results reported were obtained as partial fulfillment of the national project PRIN
C
442 “Innovative treatments for agricultural wastewater reuse” funded by the Italian Ministry of
AC
443 Education, University and Research and the Euro-India collaborative project “Water4Crops”
445
446 REFERENCES
447 APHA, AWWA, WEF, 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater,
17
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
449 Bixio, D., Thoeye, C., De Koning, J., Joksimovic, D., Savic, D., Wintgens, T., Melin, T.,
451 Blaustein, R.A., Pachepsky, Y., Hill, R.L., Shelton, D.R., Whelan, G., 2013. Escherichia coli
PT
454 sidewall flow. Journal of Contaminant Hydrology 42 (1), 35-49.
RI
455 Forslund, A., Ensink, J.H.J., Battilani, A., Kljujev, I., Gola, S., Raicevic, V., Jovanovic, Z.,
456 Stikic, R., Sandei, L., Fletcherg, T., Dalsgaard, A., 2010. Faecal contamination and hygiene
SC
457 aspect associated with the use of treated wastewater and canal water for irrigation of potatoes
459
U
Forslund, A., Ensink, J.H.J., Markussen, B., Battilani, A., Psarras, G., Gola, S., Sandei, L.,
AN
460 Fletcher, T., Dalsgaard, A., 2012. Escherichia coli contamination and health aspects of soil and
461 tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) subsurface drip irrigated with on-site treated domestic
M
463 Farhangi, M.B., Safari Sinegani, A.A., Mosaddeghi, M.R., Unc, A., Khodakaramian, G.,
TE
464 2013. Impact of calcium carbonate and temperature on survival of Escherichia coli in soil.
466 Franz, E., Semenov, A.V., Termorshuizen, A.J., de Vos, O.J., Bokhorst, J.G., van Bruggen,
467 A.H., 2008. Manure-amended soil characteristics affecting the survival of E. coli O157:H7 in 36
C
469 Gagliardi, J.V., Karns, J.S., 2000. Leaching of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in diverse soils
470 under various agricultural management practices. Applied and Environmental Microbiology
18
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
472 Généreux, M., Grenier, M., Côté, C., 2015. Persistence of Escherichia coli following
473 irrigation of strawberry grown under four production systems: Field experiment. Food Control
475 GWP (2012). Water Demand Management: The Mediterranean experience. Global Water
476 Partnership, Technical focus paper, pp. 76, www.gwp.org (accessed 29.04.15)
PT
477 Hekman, W.E., Heijnen, C.E., Trevors, J.T., van Elsas, J.D., 1994. Water flow induced
478 transport of Pseudomonas fluorescens cells through soil columns as affected by inoculant
RI
479 treatment. FEMS Microbiology Ecology 13 (4), 313-326.
SC
480 Hunter, C., McDonald, A.T., Beven, K.J., 1992. Input of faecal coliform bacteria to an upland
481 stream channel in the Yorkshire Dales. Water Resources Research 2 (8), 1869-1876.
482
U
Jamieson, R.C., Gordon, R.J., Tattrie, S.C., Stratton, G.W., 2003. Sources and persistence of
AN
483 fecal coliform bacteria in a rural watershed. Water Quality Research Journal of Canada 38 (1),
484 33–47.
M
485 Hrenovic J., Ivankovic T., 2009. Survival of Escherichia coli and Acinetobacter junii at
D
487 Kellis, M., Kalavrouziotis, I.K., Gikas, P., 2013. Review of wastewater reuse in the
488 Mediterranean countries, focusing on regulations and policies for municipal and industrial
EP
Lang, N.L., Smith, S.R., 2007. Influence of soil type, moisture content and Biosolids
C
490
491 application on the fate of Escherichia coli in agricultural soil under controlled laboratory
AC
493 Lopez, A., Pollice, A., Lonigro, A., Masi, S., Palese, A.M., Cirelli, G.L., Toscano, A.,
494 Passino, R., 2006. Agricultural wastewater reuse in southern Italy. Desalination 187 (1-3), 323-
495 334.
19
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
496 Lopez, A., Pollice, A., Laera, G., Lonigro, A., Rubino, P., 2010., Membrane filtration of
497 municipal wastewater effluents for implementing agricultural reuse in Southern Italy. Water
499 McDonald, A.T., Kay, D., Jenkins, A., 1982. Generation of faecal and total coliform surges by
500 stream flow manipulation in the absence of normal hydrometeorological stimuli. Applied and
PT
501 Environmental Microbiology 44 (2), 292-300.
502 Moyne, A.L., Sudarshana, M.R., Blessington, T., Koike, S.T., Cahn, M.D., Harris, L.J., 2011.
RI
503 Fate of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in field-inoculated lettuce. Food Microbiology 28 (8), 1417-
SC
504 1425.
505 Muela, A., García-Bringas, J.M., Arana, I., Barcina, I., 2000. The Effect of Simulated Solar
506
U
Radiation on Escherichia coli: The Relative Roles of UV-B, UV-A, and Photosynthetically
AN
507 Active Radiation. Microbial Ecology 39 (1), 65-71.
508 Naclerio, G., Nerone, V., Bucci, A., Allocca, V., Celico, F., 2009. Role of organic matter and
M
509 clay fraction on migration of Escherichia coli cells through pyroclastic soils, southern Italy.
D
511 Oliveira, M., Viñas, I., Usall, I., Anguera, M., Abadias, M., 2012. Presence and survival of
512 Escherichia coli O157:H7 on lettuce leaves and in soil treated with contaminated compost and
EP
513 irrigation water. International Journal of Food Microbiology 156 (2), 133-140.
514 Odonkor, S.T., Ampofo, J.K., 2013. Escherichia coli as an indicator of bacteriological quality
C
516 Paton, J.C., and Paton, A.W., 1998. Pathogenesis and diagnosis of Shiga toxin–producing
518 Pollice, A., Lopez, A., Laera, G., Rubino, P., Lonigro, A., 2004. Tertiary filtered municipal
519 wastewater as alternative water source in agriculture: a field investigation in southern Italy.
20
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
521 Saxton, K.E., Rawls, W.J., Romberger, J.S., Papendick., R.I., 1986. Estimating generalized
522 soil water characteristics from texture. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 50 (4), 1031-
523 1036.
524 Semenov, A.V., Franz, E., van Overbeek, L., Termorshuizen, A.J., van Bruggen, A.H.C.,
525 2008. Estimating the stability of Escherichia coli O157:H7 survival in manure amended soils
PT
526 with different management histories. Environmental Microbiology 10 (6), 1450–1459.
527 Semenov, A.V., van Overbeek, L., Termorshuizen, A.J., van Bruggen, A.H., 2011. Influence
RI
528 of aerobic and anaerobic conditions on survival of Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Salmonella
SC
529 enterica serovar Typhimurium in Luria-Bertani broth, farm-yard manure and slurry. Journal of
531
U
Shang, J., Flury, M., Deng, Y., 2009. Force measurements between particles and the air-water
AN
532 interface: Implications for particle mobilization in unsaturated porous media. Water Resources
534 Sjogren, R.E., 1995. Thirteen-year survival study of an environmental Escherichia coli in
D
535 field mini-plots. Water, Air, and Soil Pollution 81(3-4), 315-335.State of California, 1978.
TE
536 Wastewater reclamation criteria. Berkeley, CA, Dept. of Health Services. California
538 U.S. DA (Dept. of Agriculture), 1987. Soil mechanics - Level I. Module 3 - USDA Textural
539 soil classification. Study guide. United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation
C
540 Service.
AC
541 U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency), 2008. National Coastal Condition Report III.
544 World Health Organization, 1989. Health guidelines for the use of wastewater in agriculture
545 and aquaculture. Report of a WHO Scientific Group. Geneva, WHO Technical Report Series n.
546 778.
21
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
547 Wilkinson, R.J., McKergow, L.A. , Davies-Colley, R.J. , Ballantine, D.J. and Young, R.G.,
548 2011. Modelling storm-event E. coli pulses from the Motueka and Sherry Rivers in the South
549 Island, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research, 45 (3), 369-
550 393.
551 Wood, J.D., Bezanson, G.S., Gordon, R.J., Jamieson, R., 2010. Population dynamics of
PT
552 Escherichia coli inoculated by irrigation into the phyllosphere of spinach grown under
553 commercial production conditions. International Journal of Food Microbiology 143, 198-204.
RI
554 Zhai, Q., Coyne, M.S., Barnhisel, R.I., 1995. Mortality rates of fecal bacteria in subsoil
SC
555 amended with poultry manure. Bioresource Technology 54 (2), 165-169.
556
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
22
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
557 FIGURES CAPTIONS
558 Figure 1. Soil column experiment: experimental conditions. Specific irrigation volumes
560 Figure 2. Field experiments: short-term effects of a single pollution event (specific irrigation
PT
562 Figure 3. Field experiments: survival of E. coli in the topsoil (first 10 cm) and on the grass
RI
563 (scenario c. Single irrigation event and dry monitoring). Average temperature in the topsoil:
SC
565 Figure 4. Soil column experiment: concentrations of E. coli in the topsoil (first 10 cm), the
566 subsoil (from 10 cm to 36 cm depth), and in the outflows of two soil columns. At day 0 columns
567
U
were irrigated with 48 mm of raw wastewater having 1.0E+07 CFU/100mL of E. coli. Vertical
AN
568 dotted lines represent rain and irrigation events. The benchmark is a wastewater sample stored
570 Figure 5. Soil column experiment: cumulative percentages of water, salt and E. coli over time
D
571 in the outflow of the soil column that underwent the addition of sodium chloride.
TE
C EP
AC
23
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 1. Main average (± standard deviation) characteristics of the irrigation waters used in the
experiments. Inocula of E. coli were added to the MBR effluent before using it for irrigation.
Parameter MBR effluent (for field Raw wastewater (for soil Tap water (for both
experiments)a column experiment) experiments)a
Suspended solids (mg/L) <5 264 <5
Chemical Oxygen 10.3 (±7.9) 760 <5
Demand (mgO2/L)
PT
Total Nitrogen (mgN/L) 27.5 (±4.7) 60.3 1.2 (±0.1)
Ammonia (mgN/L) <1 42.0 <1
RI
Nitrite (mgN/L) <1 <1 <1
Nitrate (mgN/L) 20.3 (±5.7) <1 <1
SC
Phosphate (mgP/L) <2 16.8 <1
pH (-) 7.3 (±0.3) 6.1 7.9 (±0.1)
Electrical Conductivity 599 (±40) 1020 499 (±121)
U
(µS/cm)
E. Coli (CFU/100mL) <1 1.0E+07 <1
AN
a
41 samples of MBR effluent, 6 samples of tap water
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 2. Field experiments: scenario b. Multiple irrigation events with constant fecal contamination.
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
Table 3. Water, salt and E.coli in the inflows and the outflows of the soil column that underwent the
addition of sodium chloride. For each parameter, outflow values represent the cumulative amounts collected
after about five hours from the beginning of the watering event.
PT
0 P* 2000 1264 4000 100 2.0E+08 3.6E+04
*
8 I1 2000 1101 0 598 0 3.6E+03
RI
14 I2* 2000 1123 0 773 0 3.1E+02
27 I3* 2000 686 0 537 0 8.4E+00
*
SC
P = Pollution event; I1-I3 = Irrigation with tap water
U
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
PT
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
EP
C
AC
ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT
HIGHLIGHTS
1. Fate of E. coli after irrigation with contaminated water was assessed with field and soil column tests.
3. Dye-off is the dominant process affecting E. coli concentration in topsoil and leaching water.
4. Persistence models of E. coli in topsoil and leachate after pollution are log-linear.
PT
5. Less than 1% of E. coli in irrigation water is transferred through the soil column.
RI
U SC
AN
M
D
TE
C EP
AC