Professional Documents
Culture Documents
On The Chronology of Sender's "Réquiem Por Un Campesino Español"
On The Chronology of Sender's "Réquiem Por Un Campesino Español"
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide
range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and
facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at
https://about.jstor.org/terms
is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Romance Notes
Raymond Skyrme
116
3 See Peter A. Bly, "A Confused Reality and Its Presentation: Ramón Sender's
Réquiem por un campesino español The International Miction Review, 5, No. 2
(1978), 96; Marcelino C. Peñuelas, La obra narrativa de Ramón J. Sender (Madrid:
Gredos, 1971), pp. 144-45, whose summary of the sequence of events in the nar-
rative on these pages is contradicted by an earlier analysis of their chronology
(see below, note 5); and Dario Villanueva, Estructura y tiempo reducido en la
novela (Valencia: Editorial Bello, 1977), p. 264. Eduardo Godoy Gallardo, "Pro-
blemática y sentido de Réquiem por un campesino español , de Ramón Sender,"
Letras de Deusto , 1, No. 1 (enero-junio 1971), 70, concludes only that "la acción
de la novela debe concentrarse, incuestionablemente, antes del estallido de la guerra
civil, entre los años 1931-1936. No hay fijación precisa en el cuerpo narrativo."
follow, given the roughly two weeks that Paco was in hid
the señoritos could not have arrived in the village unti
summer, one full year after the departure of the Guardia C
1936. It is the one-year interval between these two inciden
difficult to accept, since the tragic sequence of events in
after the Guardia Civil have left appears to unfold with gre
If the reference to "siete años después " is not a printin
(both the Las Americas, p. 70, and Proyección, p. 49, ed
the same figure), can it be dismissed as a second authorial
The fact that this incongruity, unlike the earlier one, does
the chronological order of events but merely prolongs th
time in which they occur, would suggest that it can not. O
trary, it can be argued, on the basis of historical data, th
of one year between the withdrawal of the Civil Gua
apparently immediate intrusion of the forasteros is perfec
able: "Un día del mes de julio la guardia civil de la aldea se m
Los concejales sentían alguna amenaza en el aire, pero no pod
tarla. . . . Llegó a la aldea un grupo de señoritos con ve
pistolas" (p. 54). The sequence of events here almost exactl
a similar implicit time-lag between Paco's earlier election
lican municipal council and his subsequent efforts to bring
agrarian reforms. These efforts appear to begin immediatel
elections of April, 1931: "En la segunda elección el pad
cedió el puesto a su hijo. El muchacho fue elegido. ... E
suprimieron los bienes de señorío , de origen medioeval y lo
ron a los municipios " (p. 46). But the historical justificatio
reforms alluded to here and later ("hay una ley," p. 49), th
Law, was not in fact passed until September, 1932. 7
Such a lapse in the Civil War phase of the novel could f
justified by the ideology and actions of the señoritos } whi
Scarborough College
University of Toronto