Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Group2 (102,103,104,108,123) - Final
Group2 (102,103,104,108,123) - Final
COMPLEX
ENGINEERING
PROBLEM
SUBMITTED TO:
DR. MUHAMMAD
USMAN
Submitted by:
2019-ME-102
2019-ME-103
1
2|Page
Table of Contents
1. Abstract:.................................................................................................................................................4
2. Introduction:...........................................................................................................................................4
2.1. Heating and Cooling Load Calculation Techniques..........................................................................4
2.2. Hourly Analysis Program.................................................................................................................5
2.3. Photovoltaic System:......................................................................................................................5
2.4. PV Syst............................................................................................................................................5
2.5. Factors affecting Human Comfort...................................................................................................5
3. Literature Review....................................................................................................................................5
4. Methodology:.........................................................................................................................................7
4.1. Selected Truck Design and Dimensions:..........................................................................................7
4.2. Breakdown of FM D11K cabin construction:...................................................................................8
4.2.1. Roof:........................................................................................................................................9
4.2.2. Rear Wall:................................................................................................................................9
4.3. Modelling System in HAP:.............................................................................................................10
4.3.1. Weather:...............................................................................................................................10
4.3.2. Schedule:...............................................................................................................................10
4.4. Effect of Truck Movement............................................................................................................10
4.5. HAP Calculations and Dimensions:................................................................................................11
4.5.1. Wind Shield...........................................................................................................................11
4.5.2. Side Window Glass................................................................................................................12
4.5.3. Side Doors.............................................................................................................................13
4.5.4. Cabin.....................................................................................................................................14
4.5.5. Front Wall.............................................................................................................................14
4.5.6. Side Walls:.............................................................................................................................15
4.5.7. Rear Wall:..............................................................................................................................16
4.5.8. Floor......................................................................................................................................17
4.5.9. Roof:......................................................................................................................................18
4.5.10. Truck Tail...............................................................................................................................20
4.6. Engine specifications.....................................................................................................................21
4.7. Specification of A/C (if available for comparison).........................................................................21
4.8. Space Definition............................................................................................................................22
4.9. Air Conditioning System................................................................................................................22
2
3|Page
3
4|Page
2. Introduction:
The most significant contribution of automotive engineering to automotive industry is the use and
evaluation of air conditioning. Vehicles are designed with proper air conditioning systems
according to the standards outlaid by American Society of Heat and Refrigeration Engineers
(ASHRAE). Air conditioning load factors are frequently changing depending not only on
environmental conditions but also on speed and load on vehicle. Thus, the prime purpose of air
conditioning is to provide comfort to drivers as well as passengers under a variety of conditions.
The compressor requires energy to run vehicles air-conditioning system and increases its fuel
consumption more than any auxiliary feature because of extra load on the engine. However, solar
power assisted air conditioners for vehicles are being used to reduce fuel consumption.
Photovoltaic panels attached to the roof of truck’s cabin collects solar energy to charge a specially
made battery system that powers an electric motor to derive compressor which produces the cooled
air. This allows it to operate on cloudy or rainy days because it is standalone system, the Ac can be
switched on when the vehicle engine is not running. Solar panel is made from bendy materials
which can fit perfectly on vehicle’s rooftop and serves as a good thermal insulation for the interior
and other valuable equipment inside the vehicle.
2.1. Heating and Cooling Load Calculation Techniques
ASHRAE Handbook Fundamental outlines three basic methods for the estimation of heating and
cooling loads. These methods include TFM, CLF/CLTD and TA/TETD. CLF/CLTD method is
best suited for manual calculations, the method is fairly straightforward but this simplification
overlooks many parameters that cause variation in the calculations, hence disturbing the accuracy
level. CLTD/CLF method is regarded as reasonably accurate approximation of the total heat gain
for the purpose of sizing HVAC equipment. The most complex of the three is Transfer Function
Method (TFM), which involves the modelling of system parameters in the form of complex
differential equations which can only be solved using numerical techniques. Another upside to this
method is that it can analyze the system based on hourly data, which makes it possible to actually
pin-point the hour of the year at which the peak cooling load would occur.
4
5|Page
3. Literature Review
There are various types of loads to consider in automobile air conditioning. The human body
creates heat as a result of metabolic activities taking place inside of it and that heat is taken as a
heat gain by the air present in the cabin and is named as metabolic load. The radiation load is the
heat gain due to the solar radiations. These radiations can either strike the body of vehicle directly
or through reflection done by the ground nearby.[2]
5
6|Page
The ambient load is the heat gain caused by the temperature difference via conduction or
convection between the ambient and the cabin. The internal combustion engine of the vehicles can
create high temperature exhaust gases. Some of that heat is transferred to cabin via cabin floor
which is named as exhaust load[3]. The ventilation load is the result of heat gain caused by the
fresh air which is allowed to enter the vehicle cabin in order to maintain the air quality for
passengers and this consists of both sensible and latent loads. Another type of load which is taken
in consideration is the AC load required to compensate the other thermal loads in order to maintain
a temperature inside the cabin which is comfortable for the passengers.[4]
In the previous few decades, the efficient design of automobile has been of greatest interest for
automotive research[5]. The targets to achieve in this regard are reduction of fuel consumption and
tailpipe emission. According to study by Westland, J., Haskew, H. air conditioning system of
automobile has great effect on exhaust emission and he proposed that use of automobile AC lead
to increase in NOx emission from 16 percent to up to 100 percent. Similarly, Johnson in his study
said that major auxiliary. load present in automobile is the use of air conditioner. The energy
consumed by air automobile air conditioner is even more than the energy loss in aerodynamic loss,
energy loss in rolling resistance.US alone utilizes 6 billion gallons of fuel for light vehicles air
conditioning[3].
According to Finger, P.O a very clear knowledge of heating as well as cooling load experienced by
a passenger cabin is the key requirement for an efficient automobile air conditioning system
design. Thermal comfort model proposed by Fanger,P.O is widely used in AC research and
Applications[6]. Using Finger model as basis Ingersoll, J. proposed a human thermal comfort
model. His model can be sued for assessment of thermal comfort status[7].
According to Kamar, H Heat Balance Method is more reliable than weighting factor method
however weighting Factor method is easier. When more detail is available then HBM should be
the first choice[8].
Ding and Zito proposed and utilized a new lumped model for the cabin and solved the related
transient heat transfer differential analytically. Their model can act as a benchmark for problems
like cool down test. Solutions to these differential equations lead to improved and complete
understanding of air conditioning design and test[9, 10].
The standards of the ASHRAE manual give two primary strategies to figure out heat load and coal
load. These include Heat Balance Method and Weighing Factor Method. HBM is the more
accurate and conservative and at the same time complex. When small amount of data about heating
and cooling load is available then WFM is preferred and when a greater amount of data is available
HBM should be the first choice[11].
4. Methodology:
The following section will cover the methodology related to cabin construction, cooling load for
the truck cabin and selection of solar panels using PV syst. software according to the requirement
and design load.
6
7|Page
7
8|Page
A = 6.7 m
B = 6.2 m
C = 11.01m
D = 2.5 m
4.2.1. Roof:
The roof was split into front roof, side roof and top roof. The roof was split in order to achieve a
sufficient level of detail of roof where cross-section was homogeneous as possible in terms of
insulation.
8
9|Page
9
10 | P a g e
HAP was utilized to rotate the space by 45 degrees, thus making the front wall of the truck cabin to
face north east and the remaining walls follow accordingly. The process was repeated for the
remaining six directions and the corresponding reports were exported from HAP. The orientations
of the truck for eight different cases have been depicted in fig.
Dimensions Overall
Total Area Conductance
Material Lengt U
Width Height
h
Windshield
(m) (m2 ¿ (W /K . m2)
Glass sheet +
2.17 0.014 0.8 1.74 1.46
PVB +PET
10
11 | P a g e
Overall Overall
Material Layer
Material Thickness Resistance of Conductance of
Resistance
Windshield Windshield
(mm) ( K . m2 /W ) ( K . m2 /W ) (W /K . m2)
Glass Sheet 6.4 0.34
Polyvinyl
0.76 0.00322
Butyral
Polyethylene-
0.6838 1.46
terephthalate
0.2 0.00066
(PET)+CuS
Layer
Glass Sheet 6.4 0.34
Dimensions Overall
Total Area Conductance
Material Length Width Height U
Window Glass
(m) (m2 ¿ (W /K . m 2)
Overall Overall
Material Layer
Material Thickness Resistance of Conductance of
Resistance
Windshield Windshield
(mm) ( K . m2 /W ) ( K . m2 /W ) (W /K . m2)
11
12 | P a g e
Dimensions Overall
Total Area Conductance
Material Widt U
Length Height
h
Side Doors
(m) (m 2 ¿ (W / K . m2)
SM sheet + Air
0.95 0.157 1.5 1.5 0.1805
Gap
Overall Overall
Material Layer
Material Thickness Resistance of Conductance of
Resistance
Windshield Windshield
(mm) ( K . m2 /W ) ( K . m2 /W ) (W /K . m2)
SM Sheet 3.25 0.00007
Air Gap 150 5.54 5.54 0.1805
SM Sheet 3.25 0.00007
12
13 | P a g e
4.5.4. Cabin
The total internal volume of the cabin is almost 7.35 m3. The other specifications of the cabin are
presented in Table 7 as shown below:
Table 7 Truck Cabin Specifications
Dimensions
Total Volume of
Lengt Truck Cabin
Material Width Height
h
Truck cabin
(m) (m3 ¿
Mild steel sheet +
2.49 1.8 1.64 7.35
Insulation/Air space
Dimensions Overall
Total Area Conductance
Material Widt U
Length Height
h
Front Wall
(m) (m 2 ¿ (W / K . m2)
MS Sheet + Air
2.49 0.156 1.64 3.9 0.175
space
Overall Overall
Material Layer
Material Thickness Resistance of Conductance of
Resistance
Windshield Windshield
(mm) ( K . m2 /W ) ( K . m2 /W ) (W /K . m2)
13
14 | P a g e
Dimensions Overall
Total Area Conductance
Material Length Width Height U
Side Walls
(m) (m 2 ¿ (W /K . m2)
MS Sheet +
1.815 0.032 1.64 2.98 0.713
Insulation
14
15 | P a g e
15
16 | P a g e
4.5.8. Floor
The specifications of the floor are reported in the tables below as follows:
Table11 Floor Specifications
Dimensions Overall
Cabin Floor Material Total Area Conductance
Length Width Height U
16
17 | P a g e
Overall Overall
Material Layer
Material Thickness Resistance of Conductance of
Resistance
Windshield Windshield
(mm) ( K . m2 /W ) ( K . m2 /W ) (W /K . m2)
Glass Wool Noise
35 1.167
Absorber
Polypropylene
1 0.0091
Sheet 2.634 0.3796
Polyurethane
35 1.458
Insulation
SM Sheet 3.25 0.00007
4.5.9. Roof:
The roof will consist of 4 different zones. The zone areas and their compositions are shown below:
Area
Zone Name
(m2 ¿
Front Roof 0.4
Rear Roof 0.3
Side Roof 0.3
Top Roof 4.5
17
18 | P a g e
18
19 | P a g e
19
20 | P a g e
Dimensions
Total Area
Main Material Widt
Length Height
h
Truck Tail
(m) (m 2 ¿
Truck tail
Dimensions: L =10 ft, W = 8 ft, H = 3.5 ft (from ground)
20
21 | P a g e
COP 3.8
Compressor SD7H15 A/C COMPRESSOR
Type: Wobble plate type compressor
Refrigerant: R-134a
Power: (variable depending on current)
Displacement: 155 cc/rev
Speed: 6000 rpm
21
22 | P a g e
In the ventilation air, the airflow control has been set to constant. The damper leak rate has been
set to 5%, the outdoor Air CO2 level was 400ppm, according to the ASHRAE standards,
Minimum and Maximum CO2 Differentials were 100 ppm and 700 ppm respectively.
Dehumidification
The problem in question is to find the cooling load requirements during the summer season
during which the atmosphere can get very humid on some days, if the humidity level increases
too much, it also disturbs the comfort level. Humidity level is thus controlled by using the
dehumidifier which is set to a maximum relative humidity level of 60%.
Central Cooling
The central cooling system temperature has been set to 14.4oC, with a coil bypass factor of 0.1 by
default. Winter months have been excluded from the analysis and only the months of summer
from April to September have been included in the schedule. The maximum supply temperature
is set of 23oC in this section of the system.
Supply Fan
A forward curved draw thru supply fan with a Brake Horsepower of 0.5 and motor efficiency of
90% has been incorporated into the system.
Duct System
The heat gain and leakage rate in the duct system have been assumed to be 5%, the air is returned
via ducted return.
4.10.Zone Components
Zone Spaces
It comprises of the space which is already defined above. Only a single space is present and
that makes up all of the zone spaces.
Thermostats
A thermostat is added in the zone space with occupied cooling and heating set points
temperatures of 23oC and 21oC respectively. The schedule of thermostat working is the
same as that of the working hours. In case of unoccupied space, there is cooling action
present and thermostat is responsible for controlling this phenomenon. This does not affect
the calculation of cooling load as the maximum cooling load is only possible in occupied
cabin time during the whole day time.
Sizing Data
This data is available once the model has been completed and design calculations have
been performed. It is computer generated data which reflects the required equipment sizing
to meet the desired purpose of heating or cooling loads. A 10% factor of safety for sensible
22
23 | P a g e
and latent heat has been employed for designing AC system so that it works in all the
possible conditions without any problem.
Equipment
There is a predefined library of equipment data, and the component sizing is suggested
according to the estimated maximum load. Auto-sized capacity function has been
employed for the sizing of equipment.
4.11.Fundamentals of PV Syst.
Before going into the details of PV Syst. Software, some important terminologies and
fundamentals are explained in the table below:
Table 14: Fundamentals of PV Systems
Fundamentals Description
kWp Kilowatt peak is unit for output of PV system. The peak power a PV
system generates.
Pb Sealed Gel Contains sealed immobile gel like mass of mixture of sulfuric acid and
silica fumes.
Controller Ensures safe charging of the batteries and powering up of the load.
MPPT Maximum Power Point Tracking is a controller technology for
optimization of PV energy produced.
SOC State of Charge.
STC Standard Test Conditions.
P mpp The point when panel supplies maximum power.
I sc The highest value of current panel can supply is short circuit current.
V oc The highest voltage supplied by the panel is open circuit voltage.
Nominal Power The max. power obtained when resistive load of panel is varied from 0
to maximum.
Meteo File File containing the weather data of a particular location at a particular
time. It might be based on real-time data or interpolated.
Glob_Hor The amount of irradiation that is incident on the panel surface.
Glob_Eff The part of global horizontal irradiation that is effective.
E_Avail The total energy that is being produced by the panels.
E_Unused The energy that goes unused.
E_Miss The energy that is missing compared to the amount required.
E_User The energy that is available to the user.
E_Load The energy that is used by the load applied.
Sol_Frac The fraction of solar energy available to user to that used by the load.
23
24 | P a g e
The maximum load resulting from the HAP calculations served as the base for the PVsyst
simulation. PVsyst. simulation found suitable PV panels and battery packs based on the user need.
A “standalone project” was simulated on PVsyst. For Jacobabad PVsyst default database does not
have METEO file for Jacobabad. Thus, a synthetic file was imported from “MeteoNorm” to the
PVsyst database to proceed the project. The components of PV system are solar panels, battery,
controller and wiring. The peak load along with hourly distribution of 8 hours (8 am- 4 pm) for 10-
hour shift for 5 days was entered.
24
25 | P a g e
Orientation of PV Panel
25
26 | P a g e
The orientation was defined at 0 inclination. The PV panels are to be placed on top of truck tail.
The system was defined with 2.4 kWh/day average user need with a nominal power of 1.1 kWp. 4
sealed gel Pb batteries each of 12 V and 160 Ah were employed (2 in series & 2 in parallel). The
PV panels were sized to an area of 5 square meters. 2 strings with 1 in series was the suitable size
as defined by PVsyst. The solar panels used were Longi Solar LR5-72 HIH 530M G2 (530Wp)
and batteries were Generic Solar 12 V/ 160 Ah sealed Pb gel. Universal MPPT controller by
Generic was used. The system was sized keeping into consideration the fact that battery backup is
required for 1 day at most and that more energy produced will be wasted. This allowed to lower
the battery pack size to a set of only 4 batteries at the cost of lower system performance. The
26
27 | P a g e
system devised was then simulated and PVsyst tabulated the results. A trade-off had to be made
between performance factor and battery pack size. Both were kept balanced so as to devise a
system that is optimized and does not require any backup generator.
Battery Selection
27
28 | P a g e
28
29 | P a g e
29
30 | P a g e
between the cooling loads for different orientations was very little, but it is to be noted that
orientation shifted the maximum loading conditions to some other point of time. The detailed
reports generated by HAP can be retrieved from the link given below:
30
31 | P a g e
31
32 | P a g e
Maximum Coil cooling load has been encountered in the month of September with the truck
oriented towards the south west direction. shows the data about the sensible cooling load
requirement throughout the whole day and the way the zone air is conditioned by the AC system.
The working hours were set from 8 AM to 6 PM, and it is only during these hours that the zone
conditioning is being observed. The curve of zone conditioning leads the zone sensible loading
curve by a factor which is equal to the amount of heat required to lower the zone temperature to
required levels of thermal comfort (specified as 23oC in this current case). Both the demand and
the supply curves follow almost a sinusoidal pattern with respect to the time of the day. During the
hours of maximum irradiance, the required loads are increased and during the night time, the
required loads are very low.
Zone: Zone 1
Data for September
600
500
400
300
200
100
0
00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23
Hour of Day
The relationship between the total cooling load requirement with the time of the day is the same as
that of sensible load with the time. With the increase in incident solar insolation, the spaces get
heated up, consequently increasing the temperature inside the cabin. In order to bring this
temperature down, heat must be removed from that space and low temperature, conditioned air
must be introduced into the space. It is evident from next figure that the total cooling load for the
month of September reaches a maximum value of 2.2 kW at the time of 3 PM.
32
33 | P a g e
33
34 | P a g e
PV Syst. Results:
The analysis of the performed simulation begins by checking the performance ratio of the system.
The solar fraction being 1 is a sign that energy requirement is being fulfilled. The performance
ratio in this case is 41.3%. The ratio is considerably low due to use of PV system only during
summer and smaller battery pack. The end required energy requirement is still satiated. A solid
78.4% of direct and 21.6% stored energy with minor losses of about 7-8% from 954 kWh is left at
the end. This energy is surplus to power the A/C in the required working hours. Battery loss is
about 46% which is a major loss. Other minor losses are due to heating, array mismatch and dust
interference on collectors.
34
35 | P a g e
The average incident energy on the panels throughout the year is 5.513 kWh/sq. meters/day which
is a solid 0.7 kW/sq. meters. While battery losses are 2.06 kWh/kWp/day. About 1.17
kWh/kWp/day is wasted in form of array and battery storage losses. The end energy the user
receives per day is 2.28 kWh/kWp.
35
36 | P a g e
Discussion:
The system contains major loss due to battery pack being small and incapable of storing the
produced power. The small size of the battery pack is due to feasibility issues. First of all, a large
battery pack will require large space in the tail container and that has been avoided. Secondly,
instead of a larger battery pack of Pb acid batteries a smaller set of Li-ion batteries could be
employed. But that will result in very high system cost that demands a prolonged payback time.
The system will deteriorate before the break-even point is reached. The PV panels and Pb batteries
combined cost much less than a Li-ion battery making the PV system more feasible financially and
systematically.
6. Conclusion:
In this report, Hourly Analysis Program 4.90 has been employed for equipment sizing for the
driver’s truck cabin. Among the eight analyzed directions and the six targeted months without a
holiday, the maximum cooling load has been encountered when the truck was oriented along south
west direction at which the maximum flow rate of 131 L/s and total cooling load of 2.2kW was
observed. The maximum load occurs in the month of September at 1500. The final design
parameters for the worst-case scenario have been mentioned in the accompanying tables. The
maximum load is then used to design the required solar panels and batteries on Pvsyst. PV module,
controller, battery and their characteristics are mentioned in the report. The PV panels are to be placed
on top of truck tail. The system was defined with 11.8 kWh/day average user need with a nominal
power of 5 kWp. 4 sealed gel Pb batteries each of 12 V and 160 Ah were employed (2 in series &
2 in parallel). The cost of PV panels is much less than LI-ion battery.
The problem of maintaining air quality inside the driver’s cabin is very alarming, yet not much
work has been done in this regard. The effect of proper air conditioning according to the ASHRAE
36
37 | P a g e
standards of human health and thermal comfort will have a positive effect on the health of truck
drivers. It was concluded that even if the truck drivers had been satisfied with the quality of
ambient air, it would still be detrimental to their health if it is not according to the thermal comfort
standards. The inclusion of AC system in the truck cabin would help us alleviate the problem of
poor air reaching the truck drivers, and having a negative impact on their health. Consider
otherwise, that the truck drivers be provided with the proper and fresh air, they would not be
subjected to the hazards that the unconditioned air carries along with it. Having a pure air, free of
contaminants, with the ideal relative humidity level and temperature, would obviously be in the
best of interests of the drivers and it would be helpful in ensuring their well-being.
The cost analysis of the system is the foremost indication of its adaptability. The total cost of the
employment of the system is to be recovered within 5 years. The rest is absolute savings. Also, the
emissions of CO2 can be reduced up to 10% of the present value by employing this system.
Moreover, the system passes the feasibility analysis with it being a fact that there is a decent and
durable market gap. Solar power assisted air conditioning system also plays an important role in
environment sustainability. It reduces fuel consumption, air pollution, global warming and
greenhouse effect. Hence, it is concluded that solar-powered air conditioning is a productive
product that can be used in vehicles. The main advantage is that they are pollution free, echo-
friendly and economical.
7. References:
.World Population Review. Where is Pakistan in the World? [cited 2021 August]; Available
from: https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-locations/where-is-pakistan.
World Integrated Trade Solution. Pakistan Trade Summary 2019 Data. [cited 2021 August];
Available from: https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/PAK/Year/LTST/
Summary.
Javed, S. THE AUTOMOTIVE SECTOR IN PAKISTAN [cited 2021 August]; Available from:
http://www.sjbipp.org/publications/PR/projectreport/PR-14-13.pdf.
Pakistan Bureau of Statistics. 20.24 Motor Vehicles Registered. [cited 2021 August];
Available from: https://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files//other/yearbook2014/20.24.pdf.
TRTA Pakistan. ROAD FREIGHT TRANSPORT SECTOR & EMERGING COMPETITIVE
DYNAMICS. [cited 2021 August]; Available from:
http://trtapakistan.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Road-freight-transport-sector-and-
emerging-competitive-dynamics_final.pdf.
Parsons, K., ISO standards on physical environments for worker performance andproductivity.
Industrial health, 2018. 56(2): p. 93-95.
Fanger, P.O., Thermal comfort. Analysis and applications in environmental engineering.
Thermal comfort. Analysis
Botsford, J.H., A wet globe thermometer for environmental heat measurement. American
Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 1971. 32(1): p. 1-10.
37
38 | P a g e
Nishi, Y., Humid Operative Temperature. A Biophisical Index of Thermal Sensation and
Discomfort. J. Physiol., 1971. 63: p. 365-368.
Gagge, A., J.A. Stolwijk, and Y. Nishi, An effective temperature scale based on a simple
model of human physiological regulatiry response. Memoirs of the Faculty of Engineering,
Hokkaido University, 1972. 13(Suppl): p. 21-36.
Givoni, B. and R.F. Goldman, Predicting rectal temperature response to work, environment,
and clothing. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1972. 32(6): p. 812-822.
KERSLAKE, D.M., Radiation. The stress of hot environments, 1972: p. 47-74.
Givoni, B. and R.F. Goldman, Predicting heart rate response to work, environment, and
clothing. Journal of Applied Physiology, 1973. 34(2): p. 201-204.
Gonzalez, R., Y. Nishi, and A. Gagge, Experimental evaluation of standard effective
temperature a new biometeorological index of man's thermal discomfort. International journal
of biometeorology, 1974. 18(1): p. 1-15.
38