Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 12 views

    Comparison Analysis TCO

    Uploaded by

    ferrian prabowo
    The document compares the Grand Max PU 1.5 STD and the Mitsubishi Triton across several specifications such as price, fuel consumption, steering radius, safety features, ground clearance, and cargo capacity. It also provides a total cost of ownership comparison for the Triton over three years including costs for insurance, fuel, tires, service, and other expenses, showing an increasing total cost each year from about 83 million in year 1 to over 101 million in year 3.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content

    You might also like

    Comparison Analysis TCO

    Uploaded by

    ferrian prabowo
    12 views2 pages
    The document compares the Grand Max PU 1.5 STD and the Mitsubishi Triton across several specifications such as price, fuel consumption, steering radius, safety features, ground clearance, and cargo capacity. It also provides a total cost of ownership comparison for the Triton over three years including costs for insurance, fuel, tires, service, and other expenses, showing an increasing total cost each year from about 83 million in year 1 to over 101 million in year 3.

    Original Description:

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document compares the Grand Max PU 1.5 STD and the Mitsubishi Triton across several specifications such as price, fuel consumption, steering radius, safety features, ground clearance, and cargo capacity. It also provides a total cost of ownership comparison for the Triton over three years including costs for insurance, fuel, tires, service, and other expenses, showing an increasing total cost each year from about 83 million in year 1 to over 101 million in year 3.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    12 views2 pages

    Comparison Analysis TCO

    Uploaded by

    ferrian prabowo
    The document compares the Grand Max PU 1.5 STD and the Mitsubishi Triton across several specifications such as price, fuel consumption, steering radius, safety features, ground clearance, and cargo capacity. It also provides a total cost of ownership comparison for the Triton over three years including costs for insurance, fuel, tires, service, and other expenses, showing an increasing total cost each year from about 83 million in year 1 to over 101 million in year 3.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    Download as xlsx, pdf, or txt
    of 2

    Comparison List

    Grand Max PU 1.5 STD Mitsubishi Triton


    Item Keterangan
    Single Cabin 4X4 HDX
    196,500,000 403,000,000 dex: 11.350
    Price
    pertamax: 9.200
    Fuel Bensin Solar
    Grandmax = Rp. 736/ Km
    Fuel Consumption 12,5 Km/ L 9,4 km/ L Triton = 1200/ Km
    Steering Radius 4,7 meter 5,9 meter
    Airbags Tidak Ya
    ABS & EBD Tidak Ya
    Ground Clearance 175 mm 220 mm
    Velg Ring 13 Ring 16
    Maximum Pay load 800 1030 (kg)
    Cargo bed dimension 1.30 M3 1.32 M3
    TCO
    Triton Year 1 Year 2 Year 3
    Insurance Cost - -
    Fuel Cost 34,940,000 38,434,000 42,277,400
    Tyre Change Cost 5,400,000 5,940,000 6,534,000
    Service Cost 43,392,000 47,731,200 52,504,320
    Other Expenses (Tax & KEUR) - -
    83,732,000 92,105,200 101,315,720

    Triton MPK Year 1 Year 2 Year 3


    Insurance Cost
    Fuel Cost 37,869,000
    Tyre Change Cost
    Service Cost 51,677,706
    Other Expenses (Tax & KEUR)
    89,546,706

    Page 2 of 2

    You might also like