Drying rice after harvest is a major problem according to Martin Gummert from GTZ in Indonesia. Drying rice is more difficult than farm automation because mechanical dryers require adapting existing post-harvest systems. The drying process is also complicated, involving air and crop properties which require deep process knowledge. As a result, many prototypes have been developed but users have not continued using newly designed dryers for various reasons. Both small-scale and large-scale dryers have their place, and fitting millers' needs and operations is more important than the latest technology. The quest for a universal drying solution is the wrong approach; specific technical solutions should be identified for drying problems within local systems contexts.
Drying rice after harvest is a major problem according to Martin Gummert from GTZ in Indonesia. Drying rice is more difficult than farm automation because mechanical dryers require adapting existing post-harvest systems. The drying process is also complicated, involving air and crop properties which require deep process knowledge. As a result, many prototypes have been developed but users have not continued using newly designed dryers for various reasons. Both small-scale and large-scale dryers have their place, and fitting millers' needs and operations is more important than the latest technology. The quest for a universal drying solution is the wrong approach; specific technical solutions should be identified for drying problems within local systems contexts.
Drying rice after harvest is a major problem according to Martin Gummert from GTZ in Indonesia. Drying rice is more difficult than farm automation because mechanical dryers require adapting existing post-harvest systems. The drying process is also complicated, involving air and crop properties which require deep process knowledge. As a result, many prototypes have been developed but users have not continued using newly designed dryers for various reasons. Both small-scale and large-scale dryers have their place, and fitting millers' needs and operations is more important than the latest technology. The quest for a universal drying solution is the wrong approach; specific technical solutions should be identified for drying problems within local systems contexts.
Martin Gummert (GTZ, Indonesia) declares that paddy
drying is the problem in rice post-harvest. Drying notes Martin, is much more difficult compared to farm automation because use of mechanical dryers often requires adaptation of technology into an existing post-harvest system. Further, the drying process is a complicated process involving air and crop properties, which require a deep knowledge of the process. It is a challenge to engineers and as a result so many have been involved in seeking solutions that there are many prototypes of dryer which work technically in the labs. Martin adds that users of the newly designed dryers have not continued their use for various reasons. This is not due to lack of research on the topic; perhaps the problem analysis has not been satisfactory. IRRI, NARS, ACIAR projects have done a tremendous job of studying the drying behaviour of rice under diverse conditions and settings, promoting recent discussions around the question of where to do the drying: on the farm, with farmers' groups, at commercial mills, or at government rice marketing centres. Occasionally there is demand for certain dryers by farmers or private sector groups, without government subsidy. Cases include Dr Hien's flatbed dryers in Vietnam, Dr Somchart's fluid bed dryer in Thailand, the IRRI/GTZ-UAF low temperature SRR farm dryer in Vietnam, the recirculating Taiwan made dryers used by millers in the Philippines. The lesson seems to be that there is a place for both small scale and large-scale dryers. There are advantages to using dryers in the private sector; and, fitting the millers needs and modes of operation is more important to them than the "state-of-the-art" technology. The quest for an ultimate universal technology which seems so important in the scientific community, where each research group competes and promotes its own solution, is the wrong approach. Martin finds it more sensible to look at drying problems at all levels and circumstances, and identifies specific technical solutions for them within the systems context. This requires a database of different drying technologies.