ACS Omega hitp//pubsaesorgjournalacsodt Figure 10, Equivalent (vow Mises) stresses due to protection sons: (s)allunprotected; (b)allprotected. ‘Table 4. Relative von Mises Stress Levels for the Test Specimens vue omental ttm apt specionen ID (ME) (Nm) (MP) (ata) (ER) ER) ginal at Sra 97-078 “1s eC a 4m 7509078600000 ‘opetected siiproeced $08 8499018577 SSH 09H prteced(8) 4980840. ISDS = protected 477710 oss aL 10 preted 47s 320 ass? ws 08 io) regents $01 soso tmg7 aah a proto S08 S497 8824604 “Uy preected(U 48079120 BLT 340s 3c «© Protection of beam (B) in the individual or binary combinations leads tothe increase of ultimate moment capacity alongside the decreate of inital stifness. This situation results in excessive stress concentration atthe joint, especially the connector tabs. ‘© The most critical stress level is achieved around the connector tabs, because lateral surfaces of the tabs are the most stressed regions due to their thinner cross sections and the point contact withthe tab holes ofthe ‘upright. # While protection of the allrack system members yields significant performance increment in terms ofthe whole structural behavior, protection of connector in individual ‘or binary conditions ensures acceptable advantages. MI AUTHOR INFORMATION Corresponding Author Fatih Mehmet Oxkal — Department of Civil Engineering, “Atak University, 25240 Erzuran, Turkey, © orcid.org/ (0900-0007-5552-283X; Email: fmorkal@atauniedusr Authors Burak Kaan Cispici — Department of Civil Enginecring, Erzurum Techical University, 25050 Erzurum, Turkey Suleyman Nazif Orhan ~ Department of Civil Engineering, Erzurum Technical University, 25050 Erzurum, Turkey (asim Yai — Department of Construction, Agr Ibrahim Gegen University, 04400 Agr, Turkey; © otcc.org/0000- 0002-2061-4275, Complete contact information is available at Itps://pubs.acs.org/10.1021 /aesomegs.2c0S287 Notes ‘The authors declare no competing financial interest ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ‘This study wae supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey, TUBITAK (Grant no 122M322).. REFERENCES (0) Shah S. N. Ry Ram Sulong, N. 15 Shara, Mi Khan, Rs Juma, M. 7 Bebavior of Steel Plt” Rack Beamto-Columa Connecions at Elevated Temperatures. Thi-Walled Sir. 2016, 10, 471483. (Q) ANSI MIS, A. Spefcaon for the Deipy, Tasting and Unison of Industrial Stel Storage Racks Rack, Mapuieoress Institute: NC, USA, 2019. (G) CEN. EN 15512:2021 Stet Static Storage Sytome- Adjustable Palit Racking Sytem» Principle for Sacral Design, 2020. (4) Standard, AAS 4085-2012 Stel Storage Racing 2012 (5) Cuafont MG; Rowe, Fy Pastor, Ms Bonads, Js Peis, Distorional Bucking Tes for Stel Storage Rack Coan, Proz ns. Gin Bg Src. Bul 2013, 165 (8), 392102 (6) Alsi Bello, ML; Wang. Ys Sa, M. iret Strength Method for Col-Formed Steel Beams with Now-Usiform Tempectites, Prec Int. Gi Eng: Struct Bul 2021, 174 (9), 773-790. (0) Johastan, RP-Dy Ln J.B, Lay HH Xu, Y; Sone Ms Asstong, CG; Me, CC. Fine Element Investigation of Colt Formed Stee Portal Frames in Fite Pre It. CEng Stas. Bul 2016, 169 (1), 3-18. (8) Ali, Bs Yar, Cj Geka FM, Investigation of Fite Bects on Reinforced Concrete Members via Fste Element Analysis. ACS Omega 2022, 7 (30), 26881-26893 (9) Horacek, H; Pc, 5. The Inportace of Intumescent Sytens for Fite Protection of Plasie Mater. Palm Int 2000, 48 (10), os=1n14 (00) Blows, A; De Sika, Ds Nig, E. Strctanl Fite Saf of Eaistng Stel Buildings Posble General Approach and Appiation to the Case ofthe Latmescent Coatings. App. Struct. ee Bing 2017, Dok 10.8311/asf-2015011,