Creep - Creep Rupture of Unsaturated Clay (Thesis) UBC - 1970 - A1 S54

You might also like

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 183

CREEP RUPTURE OF

SATURATED UNDISTURBED CLAYS

by

DAVID EDWARD SNEAD


B . A . S c , U n i v e r s i t y o f B r i t i s h Columbia, 1962

A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL(FULFILMENT OF


THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY

i n t h e Department
of
C i v i l Engineering

We accept t h i s t h e s i s as conforming t o t h e
required standard:

THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA


September, 1970
In p r e s e n t i n g this thesis in p a r t i a l fulfilment of the requirements for

an a d v a n c e d d e g r e e a t the University, of British Columbia, I agree that

the L i b r a r y shall make it freely available for reference and study.

I further agree that permission for extensive copying o f this thesis

for scholarly p u r p o s e s may be g r a n t e d by t h e Head o f my D e p a r t m e n t or

by h i s representatives. It is understood that copying or publication

of this thesis for financial gain shall not be a l l o w e d w i t h o u t my

written permission.

Department of Civil Engineering

The U n i v e r s i t y o f B r i t i s h Columbia
V a n c o u v e r 8, Canada

Date October 14, 1970


ABSTRACT

The stress/strain relationship f o r most engineering

materials i s known t o be time dependent. This i s most evident

during a creep test i n which continual deformations are ob-

served under constant stress conditions. In the laboratory,

a specimen of cohesive soil subjected to a constant shear

stress may fail after having deformed alt r e l a t i v e l y slow

rates for a considerable time. This type of failure, termed

creep rupture, i s a l s o known to occur i n the field.

Results of drained and undrained triaxial creep

rupture tests are presented in this thesis. These tests

were performed on a sensitive marine clay from western Canada

which was consolidated to various stress histories. Pore

pressure measurements were taken during undrained tests using

an electrical transducer. In a d d i t i o n to the creep rupture

tests, incremental load and constant strain rate triaxial

tests were performed for comparative purposes.

The strain rate during a creep rupture test was

observed to initially decrease as the specimen s t r a i n e d ,

reach a transient minimum strain rate, and then increase

until rupture. Failure was found t o be inevitable whenever


the s t r a i n rate s t a r t e d to increase a f t e r having reached a

minimum v a l u e . Pore p r e s s u r e s measured d u r i n g the undrained

t e s t s d i d not r e f l e c t the onset of creep r u p t u r e a t the

t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e , and therefore, the onset of

creep r u p t u r e cannot be e x p l a i n e d i n terms of e f f e c t i v e

stresses.

A r e l a t i o n s h i p was found t o e x i s t between the

deviator stress, s t r a i n and current s t r a i n rate during un-

d r a i n e d t r i a x i a l t e s t s having the same c o n s o l i d a t i o n history.

T h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p p e r m i t t e d the p r e d i c t i o n of the r e s u l t s of

constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s based on the r e s u l t s of creep

rupture t e s t s . This resulted i n an understanding of the

i n t e r r e l a t i o n between the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e of

a creep r u p t u r e t e s t and the maximum d e v i a t o r stress of a

constant s t r a i n r a t e test.

Once the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e had been

reached, the r e s u l t s of creep r u p t u r e t e s t s showed t h a t the

s t r a i n r a t e was inversely proportional to the time remaining

before rupture. T h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p i s independent of stress

level, consolidation h i s t o r y and drainage c o n d i t i o n s . As a

result, i t i s suggested t h a t measurement of deformations i n

the f i e l d can be used to p r e d i c t the time u n t i l a sudden


iv

f a i l u r e would be anticipated.

The upper y i e l d strength, d e f i n e d as the maximum

compressive s t r e s s which w i l l not cause a creep rupture

f a i l u r e , was evaluated from both creep r u p t u r e and constant

s t r a i n rate tests. I t was found t h a t the compressive

strength increased as a l i n e a r f u n c t i o n of the cube r o o t

of the s t r a i n r a t e .
V

TABLE OP CONTENTS

Page

1 - INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Introduction 1

1.2 Purpose and Scope 3

2 - LITERATURE REVIEW 5

2.1 F i e l d O b s e r v a t i o n s o f Creep 5

2.2 S t u d i e s o f Time-dependent Behaviour of

M e t a l s and P l a s t i c s 7

2.3 Creep and Creep Rupture 14

2.4 Use o f the Rate Process Theory t o P r e d i c t

Creep Behaviour 22

2.5 E f f e c t o f Time on S t r e n g t h T e s t s 27

2.6 Summary 33

3 - LABORATORY TESTING 34

3.1 Description of Clay 34

3.2 Development o f T e s t i n g Program 37

4 - RESULTS OF CREEP RUPTURE TESTS 48

4.1 Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s on


Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Samples 48
vi

4.2 Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s on Overcon-


s o l i d a t e d Samples ( O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n Ratio
= 2) 68

4.3 Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s on Overcon-


s o l i d a t e d Samples ( O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o
=6) 73

4.4 Drained Creep Rupture T e s t s on Overcon-


s o l i d a t e d Samples ( O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o
= 25) 76
i

4.5 Undrained Creep Rupture Tests, on Overcon-


s o l i d a t e d Samples ( O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o
= 25) 82

4.6 Summary , 87

5 - CREEP RUPTURE CRITERIA 88

5.1 Line o f Minimum S t r a i n Rates 88

5.2 T o t a l Rupture L i f e C r i t e r i o n 100

5.3 P r e d i c t i o n o f Creep Rupture F a i l u r e s i n


the Laboratory 104

5.4 P r e d i c t i o n o f Creep Rupture F a i l u r e s i n


the F i e l d 108

6 - STRESS/STRAIN/STRAIN RATE THEORY 111

6.1 Introduction 111

6.2 D e v i a t o r S t r e s s / S t r a i n / S t r a i n Rate
Relationship 112
vii

Page

6.3 E v a l u a t i o n of the Upper Y i e l d Strength 123

7 - CONCLUSIONS 133

BIBLIOGRAPHY 136

APPENDIX A - Test Equipment and Testing^ Procedures 141


i

APPENDIX B - T y p i c a l R e s u l t s from Creep! Rupture


Tests 156
LIST OF TABLES

P h y s i c a l P r o p e r t i e s o f Haney C l a y

Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y
Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y 1 ( 7 7 = 2 )
Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y ( 7 7 = 6 )
Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y ( 7 7 = 2 5 )

Drained Creep Rupture T e s t s

O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y ( 7 7 = 2 5 )
Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

Upper Y i e l d S t r e n g t h f o r Haney C l a y
IX

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure Page

1 T y p i c a l Creep Rupture Curve 9

2 P r e d i c t e d and A c t u a l T e n s i l e Creep
of P l e x i g l a s 12

3 R e l a t i o n s h i p between Creep Rupture


L i f e and Secondary S t r a i n Rate 18

4 R e l a t i o n s h i p between d S / d l o g t and 0"


Obtained from Creep T e s t s 25

5 I n f l u e n c e o f Rate o f S t r e s s A p p l i c a -
t i o n on Upper Y i e l d S t r e n g t h Obtained
from Incremental Loading T e s t s 25

6 T y p i c a l Pore P r e s s u r e B u i l d - u p a f t e r
36 Hours o f C o n s o l i d a t i o n 50
I

7 Undrained Creep T e s t
Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d 53
i
8 • Pore P r e s s u r e / S t r a i n Curve

Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d 54

9 Pore P r e s s u r e / S t r a i n Curve (17=6) 56

10 Log S t r a i n Rate v e r s u s Log E l a p s e d


Time (Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d ) 58
11 S t r a i n / T i m e Curve
0-5,000 Minutes 60

12 S t r a i n / T i m e Curve
0-50,000 Minutes 60

\
X

Figure Page

13 Log S t r a i n Rate versus Log Time f o r


Saturated I l l i t e 62

14 Development o f fj, / <T' d u r i n g a


1
3

Creep T e s t 66

15 Maximum Oj'/CTj' Obtained from Creep


Tests 66

16 E f f e c t o f D e v i a t o r S t r e s s on Pore
Pressure 67

17 Undrained Creep T e s t
Overconsolidation Ratio = 2 70

18 Log S t r a i n Rate versus Log E l a p s e d


Time (17 =2) 71

19 Undrained Creep T e s t
Overconsolidation Ratio = 6 74

20 Log S t r a i n Rate versus Log E l a p s e d


Time ( 7 7 = 6 ) 77

21 Drained Creep T e s t
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 25 79

22 Log Shear S t r a i n Rate versus Log


E l a p s e d Time (TJ=25) 81

23 Undrained Creep T e s t
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 25 84

24 Log S t r a i n Rate versus Log E l a p s e d


Time (-^=25) 85

25 Strain/Time R e s u l t s
Undrained Creep o f Haney C l a y 89
XX

Figure Page

26 S t r a i n Rate/Time R e s u l t s
Undrained Creep T e s t s
Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y 91

27 S t r a i n Rate/Time R e s u l t s
Undrained Creep T e s t s
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y (17=2) 94

28 S t r a i n Rate/Time R e s u l t s
Undrained Creep T e s t s
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y (17=6) 95

29 S t r a i n Rate/Time R e s u l t s i
Undrained and D r a i n e d Creep T e s t s
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y (77=25) 97

30 Line of T r a n s i e n t Minimum S t r a i n Rates


Haney C l a y 99

31 T o t a l Rupture L i f e o f L a b o r a t o r y

Creep T e s t s 102

32 Time t o R u p t u r e / S t r a i n Rate Curve 106

33 Time t o R u p t u r e / S t r a i n Rate
Relationship 106
34 S t r a i n R a t e / S t r a i n Curves
Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y 114

35 S t r a i n R a t e / S t r a i n Curves
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y (77=2) 115

36 S t r a i n R a t e / S t r a i n Curves
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y (77=6) 116

37 P r e d i c t e d and A c t u a l S t r e s s / S t r a i n
Curves f o r Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d
Haney C l a y 118

1
xii

Figure Page

38 P r e d i c t e d and A c t u a l S t r e s s / S t r a i n
Curves f o r O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney
C l a y (-n = 2) 119

39 P r e d i c t e d and A c t u a l S t r e s s / S t r a i n
Curves f o r O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney
C l a y (77=6) 120

40 D e t e r m i n a t i o n of Upper Y i e l d

S t r e n g t h u s i n g Proposed Method 125

41 S t r e s s versus Secondary Creep Rate 128

42 S t r e s s versus Cube Root of Secondary

Creep Rate 128

43 R e s u l t s of Undrained Creep of I l l i t e 130

44 Incremental Loading T e s t s on Haney


Clay 132
45 Schematic Layout of S t r e s s - c o n t r o l l e d
Apparatus 143
46 Schematic Layout of Constant S t r a i n
Rate Apparatus 145

47 Volume Change and Pore P r e s s u r e


Measuring U n i t 147

48 Sample b e i n g I n s t a l l e d i n Stress-
c o n t r o l l e d Apparatus 150

49 Creep Test i n Progress 150

50 Sample b e i n g I n s t a l l e d i n Constant
S t r a i n Rate Apparatus 154

51 Constant S t r a i n Rate T e s t i n
Progress 154

52 C a l c u l a t i o n of S t r a i n Rates 160
1
xiii
I

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

T h i s t h e s i s i s a c o n t r i b u t i o n t o the r e s e a r c h p r o -

gram a t the U n i v e r s i t y o f B r i t i s h Columbia on the s t r e n g t h

and deformation c h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f c o h e s i v e s o i l s . The

N a t i o n a l Research C o u n c i l o f Canada has supported t h i s p r o -

gram and the f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e r e c e i v e d has been g r e a t l y

appreciated.

The w r i t e r wishes t o express h i s thanks t o Dr.

W. D. Liam F i n n f o r h i s guidance and c o n s t r u c t i v e criticism

and t o Dr. R. G. Campanella and Dr. P. M. Byrne f o r t h e i r

h e l p f u l comments.

The t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e s u p p l i e d by t h e s t a f f o f

the C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g Department Workshop i s g r a t e f u l l y

acknowledged.

S i n c e r e thanks are extended t o Mrs. Jean O r t f o r the

t y p i n g , t o Miss Sue B e l l f o r t h e d r a f t i n g and, o f course, t o

my w i f e , Jane, f o r h e r continuous encouragement.


- 1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 - Introduction

At p r e s e n t , 1970, L i m i t Design i s used f o r most

s o i l mechanics problems which i n v o l v e the s t r e n g t h and sta-

b i l i t y of s o i l masses. T h i s method compares the t o t a l avail-

able shear s t r e n g t h w i t h the average s t r e n g t h r e q u i r e d to

maintain e q u i l i b r i u m , thereby p r o v i d i n g a f a c t o r of s a f e t y

against f a i l u r e . The t o t a l a v a i l a b l e shear s t r e n g t h i s based

upon the s o i l ' s s t r e n g t h p a r a m e t e r s — f r i c t i o n and cohesion—


i

the s l o p e and i n t e r c e p t , r e s p e c t i v e l y , of the Mohr-Coulomb

s t r e n g t h envelope. Although p r o v i d i n g a means f o r design

a g a i n s t t o t a l c o l l a p s e , L i m i t Design does not estimate the


i

magnitude of a n t i c i p a t e d d e f o r m a t i o n s .

In S o i l Mechanics and Foundation E n g i n e e r i n g , de-

s i g n i s o f t e n governed by deformation c r i t e r i a , r a t h e r than

by u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h and, t h e r e f o r e , i t i s n e c e s s a r y to p r e -

d i c t deformations i n a d d i t i o n t o u l t i m a t e s t r e n g t h . Until

the r e c e n t development of the f i n i t e element method o f analy-

sis, i t has been necessary, f o r most p r a c t i c a l cases, to

estimate deformations based upon experience and semiempirical

equations, s i n c e more exact computational methods were not

available.
- 2

The f i n i t e element r e p r e s e n t a t i o n of the continuum

has allowed e v a l u a t i o n of deformations based upon a m u l t i -

linear e l a s t i c representation of the s t r e s s / s t r a i n r e l a t i o n

for the s o i l (Finn 1967, Clough and Woodward 1967). For

some s o i l s , t h i s s t r e s s / s t r a i n r e l a t i o n i s time dependent,

an a d d i t i o n a l v a r i a b l e which, p r e s e n t l y , has not been i n c o r -

porated d i r e c t l y i n t o the f i n i t e element method of a n a l y s i s .

However, w i t h f u r t h e r development o f f i n i t e element t e c h n i -

ques, i t should be p o s s i b l e t o i n c l u d e t h i s v a r i a b l e and

p r e d i c t deformations based upon s t r e s s / s t r a i n / t i m e r e l a t i o n -

ships. These analyses will r e q u i r e a more comprehensive

understanding of the e f f e c t of time on s t r e s s / s t r a i n r e l a -

t i o n s than p r e s e n t l y e x i s t s and, therefore, further research

i s r e q u i r e d i n t h i s f i e l d of study.

The influence o f time on s t r e s s / s t r a i n r e l a t i o n s

can b e s t be demonstrated w i t h a creep t e s t . In t h i s t e s t ,

the sample continues to s t r a i n , although the s t r e s s remains

constant. T h i s s i t u a t i o n has been observed under f i e l d con-

d i t i o n s by many, i n c l u d i n g H a e f e l i (1953a), G o l d s t e i n and

Ter-Stepanian (19 57), S a i t o and Uezawa (1961), and Suklje

(1961). They r e p o r t c o n t i n u a l movements t a k i n g p l a c e in


n a t u r a l slopes i n which the t o t a l s t r e s s e s are remaining

nearly constant. In c e r t a i n cases, i t has been reported

t h a t , a f t e r many years o f t h i s c o n t i n u a l movement, deforma-

t i o n rates increased r a p i d l y , leading to a catastrophic

failure ( S u k l j e 1961) .

A l o s s o f s t r e n g t h w i t h time has a l s o been ob-

served i n l a b o r a t o r y s t u d i e s by many, i n c l u d i n g Bishop


I

(1966), Casagrande and W i l s o n (1951) and S a i t o and Uezawa

(1961). Therefore, a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the e f f e c t o f

time on s t r e n g t h parameters should be h e l p f u l f o r b o t h the

prevention and the p r e d i c t i o n o f long-term creep failures.

1.2 - Purpose and Scope


i

T h i s t h e s i s , based upon l a b o r a t o r y r e s u l t s , i s an

attempt t o f u r t h e r c l a r i f y t h e e f f e c t o f time on t h e s t r e n g t h

properties of undisturbed saturated clays. The l a b o r a t o r y

i n v e s t i g a t i o n , c a r r i e d out on a l o c a l l y - a v a i l a b l e s e n s i t i v e

c l a y , i n v o l v e d constant s t r e s s t r i a x i a l t e s t s , w i t h pore

pressure measurements, a t s t r e s s l e v e l s h i g h enough t o cause

creep r u p t u r e . Constant s t r a i n r a t e and i n c r e m e n t a l stress

t r i a x i a l t e s t s were i n c l u d e d i n the i n v e s t i g a t i o n f o r
- 4

comparative purposes. This thesis investigates the phenome-

n o l o g i c a l b e h a v i o u r of s a t u r a t e d clays i n terms of b o t h

t o t a l and e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s , and a major p o r t i o n of the

t h e s i s i s devoted t o i n v e s t i g a t i n g the o c c u r r e n c e and p r e -

d i c t i o n of creep rupture.

i
- 5

CHAPTER 2

LITERATURE REVIEW

T h i s l i t e r a t u r e review p r e s e n t s p e r t i n e n t i n -

formation i n s o i l mechanics l i t e r a t u r e on the e f f e c t of

time on both s t r e s s / s t r a i n r e l a t i o n s h i p s and s t r e n g t h .

I t a l s o i n c l u d e s a b r i e f mention o f r h e o l o g i c a l s t u d i e s

c a r r i e d out on metals and p l a s t i c s and ,is presented i n


I
the f o l l o w i n g s u b s e c t i o n s :

2.1 F i e l d Observations o f Creep

2.2 S t u d i e s of Time-dependent Behaviour


of Metals and P l a s t i c s

2.3 Creep and Creep Rupture

2.4 Use o f the Rate process Theory to


P r e d i c t Creep Behaviour

2.5 E f f e c t of Time on S t r e n g t h T e s t s

2.1 - F i e l d Observations of Creep

Haefeli (1953a) d e s c r i b e d many p r a c t i c a l examples

of s i t u a t i o n s where creep has been of importance in soils,

snow and i c e . In p a r t i c u l a r , H a e f e l i (1953b) d e s c r i b e d the

e f f e c t of a c r e e p i n g s l o p e on an abutment o f a r a i l w a y
b r i d g e c r o s s i n g the Landquart R i v e r i n S w i t z e r l a n d . To stop

t r a n s l a t i o n of t h i s abutment, a l a r g e h o r i z o n t a l beam was '

p l a c e d across the r i v e r between abutments. T h i s beam was

instrumented and the p r e s s u r e s e x e r t e d on the abutment due

t o creep were measured. H a e f e l i r e p o r t e d t h a t between 1944

and 1950 the p r e s s u r e tended to i n c r e a s e , although some sea-

s o n a l f l u c t u a t i o n s were noted.
i
l

Long-term f a i l u r e s i n London c l a y s l o p e s were i n -

v e s t i g a t e d by Henkel (1957). A t N o r t h o l t , one of the sites

i n v e s t i g a t e d , Henkel r e p o r t e d t h a t s u b s t a n t i a l movements and

a s e r i e s of t e n s i o n c r a c k s a l o n g the top o f the s l o p e were

observed a t l e a s t s i x months b e f o r e f a i l u r e occurred.

Suklje (1961) r e p o r t e d a long-term creep l a n d -

s l i d e which o c c u r r e d along the Gradot Ridge i n Macedonia i n

19 56. Tension c r a c k s up t o 90 f e e t deep were observed 30

years b e f o r e the f a i l u r e . A year b e f o r e the f a i l u r e , the

lower s i d e o f a c r a c k was noted to have subsided 20 centi-

meters. F u r t h e r subsidence was observed a few weeks b e f o r e

failure.

I t i s c l e a r from these examples t h a t f a i l u r e s do

not always take p l a c e without p r e v i o u s warning. Therefore,


- 7

a b e t t e r u n d e r s t a n d i n g o f the mechanism and time-dependent

behaviour of long-term f a i l u r e s may r e s u l t i n methods f o r

p r e d i c t i n g impending failure.

2.2 - S t u d i e s o f Time-dependent Behaviour


of M e t a l s and P l a s t i c s

The s t r e s s / s t r a i n response of most e n g i n e e r i n g

m a t e r i a l s i s a f f e c t e d by v a r i a t i o n s i n jtemperature and dura-

t i o n of t e s t . E n g i n e e r s have, t h e r e f o r e , c a r r i e d out con-

s i d e r a b l e r e s e a r c h i n an attempt t o e x p l a i n and p r e d i c t this

behaviour. Two b a s i c approaches have e v o l v e d f o r these i n -

vestigations. The f i r s t , u s u a l l y r e f e r r e d t o as the

m a c r o a n a l y t i c a l or phenomenological approach, d e s c r i b e s the

a c t u a l phenomena i n terms o f measurable p h y s i c a l parameters,

such as s t r e s s , s t r a i n , time and temperature. The second,

r e f e r r e d t o as the m i c r o m e c h a n i s t i c approach, d e s c r i b e s the

phenomena i n terms o f the b e h a v i o u r o f the atomic or molecu-

l a r s t r u c t u r e o f the m a t e r i a l . Research c a r r i e d out

a c c o r d i n g to t h i s approach i n c l u d e s the a p p l i c a t i o n o f the

rate process theory to p l a s t i c s , rubber and a s p h a l t (Ree and

E y r i n g 1958, H e r r i n and Jones 1963). R e s u l t s o f these

i n v e s t i g a t i o n s have r e s u l t e d i n q u a l i t a t i v e , but not


- 8

q u a n t i t a t i v e , p r e d i c t i o n s o f t h e response t o a p p l i e d shear

stress. T h e r e f o r e , although i n c r e a s i n g emphasis i s b e i n g

p l a c e d upon t h i s approach a t p r e s e n t , i t s t i l l appears t o

r e q u i r e c o n s i d e r a b l e development b e f o r e b e i n g u s e f u l f o r

q u a n t i t a t i v e p r e d i c t i o n o f macroscopic behaviour.

On t h e o t h e r hand, a q u a n t i t a t i v e p r e d i c t i o n can

u s u a l l y be made u s i n g a phenomenological approach. The d i s -

advantage o f t h i s approach i s t h a t the p r e d i c t i o n can

n o r m a l l y be a p p l i e d o n l y t o a l i m i t e d number o f s i t u a t i o n s ,

s i m i l a r t o t h a t from which t h e r e l a t i o n was o b t a i n e d , as t h e

b a s i s f o r t h e p r e d i c t i o n may not be fundamental t o t h e mate-

r i a l ' s behaviour. In t h i s t h e s i s , t h e a n a l y s i s o f time-

dependent behaviour i s mainly r e s t r i c t e d t o a phenomenologi-

c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n and, t h e r e f o r e , t h i s l i t e r a t u r e review i s

likewise restricted.

A t y p i c a l s t r a i n / t i m e curve f o r a creep t e s t i s

shown i n F i g u r e 1. The shape o f t h i s curve i s s i m i l a r f o r

many e n g i n e e r i n g m a t e r i a l s , such as metals, c o n c r e t e and

plastics. T h i s curve has been s u b d i v i d e d by many r e s e a r c h e r s

i n t o f o u r s e p a r a t e s t a g e s ; these f o u r stages a r e :
- 9

FIGURE I - TYPICAL CREEP RUPTURE CURVE


- 10

Stage 1 Instantaneous deformation (£ )


Q

Stage 2 Primary creep ( £ 0 t o £. )

Stage 3 Secondary creep ( 8, t o £ ) 2

Stage 4 T e r t i a r y creep (£ 2 to£ r )

The instantaneous deformation i s o f t e n r e f e r r e d t o

as the i n i t i a l e l a s t i c deformation, but i n f a c t u s u a l l y com-


i

prxses b o t h e l a s t i c and p l a s t i c d e f o r m a t i o n s . Primary creep

i s d e f i n e d as the stage d u r i n g which the s t r a i n r a t e i s con-

t i n u a l l y d e c r e a s i n g , w h i l e secondary creep i s d e f i n e d as the

stage d u r i n g which the s t r a i n r a t e i s n e a r l y c o n s t a n t .

T e r t i a r y creep i s the f i n a l stage r e s u l t i n g i n creep rup-

t u r e , and, t h e r e f o r e , the s t r a i n r a t e i n c r e a s e s d u r i n g t h i s

stage. Most e n g i n e e r i n g m a t e r i a l s e x h i b i t both Stages 1 and

2, but secondary and t e r t i a r y creep may or may not be evi-

dent, depending upon the m a t e r i a l and the a p p l i e d s t r e s s e s .


Zener and Holloman (1946) proposed t h a t a unique

r e l a t i o n e x i s t s between s t r e s s , s t r a i n , strain rate and

temperature f o r metals s u b j e c t e d t o t e n s i l e l o a d i n g , which

was independent o f the s t r a i n r a t e and temperature history

of the metal; thus, the t e n s i l e s t r e s s c o u l d be expressed

as:
s=f (£, e, T) (i)

where: S = current tensile stress

8 = current strain

8 = current strain rate

T = current temperature

Lubahn and F e l g a r (1961) s t a t e d t h a t , upon i n -


!
j

v e s t i g a t i o n of a v a i l a b l e r e s e a r c h on metals, overwhelming

evidence i s found t o show t h a t the temperature of p r i o r

s t r a i n i n g does a f f e c t c u r r e n t b e h a v i o u r . Lubahn and Felgar

do suggest, however, t h a t a r e l a t i o n e x i s t s between s t r e s s ,

s t r a i n and s t r a i n r a t e f o r metals a t c o n s t a n t temperature,

which i s independent of the s t r a i n r a t e h i s t o r y .

Pao and Marin (1952) used t h i s concept t o p r e d i c t

the t e n s i l e creep behaviour of P l e x i g l a s based upon the r e -

s u l t s of a s e r i e s of c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s . Figure 2

shows the p r e d i c t e d and a c t u a l t e n s i l e creep behaviour ob-

t a i n e d by Pao and M a r i n . I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o note that

two of the t e s t s shown i n F i g u r e 2 were a t s t r e s s l e v e l s

l a r g e enough t o r e s u l t i n creep r u p t u r e . (This i s not

r e a d i l y apparent, s i n c e the e l a p s e d time i s p l o t t e d on a


- 12

0.7

TEMPERATURE 77°F ~"


0 RELATIVE HUMIDITY 50 %

0.1 I 10 100
TIME (MINUTES)

(AFTER PAO a MARIN, 1952)

LEGEND

PREDICTED FROM RESULTS OF CONSTANT


STRAIN RATE TESTS

• • • TENSILE CREEP DATA

FIGURE 2 - PREDICTED AND ACTUAL


TENSILE CREEP OF PLEXIGLAS
- 13

logarithmic scale.) Pao and Marin obtained predicted

creep curves by g r a p h i c a l , and numerical methods., r a t h e r

than by e v a l u a t i n g a mathematical r e l a t i o n s h i p between

s t r e s s , s t r a i n and s t r a i n r a t e . The authors s t a t e t h a t the

exact form of an equation r e l a t i n g s t r e s s , s t r a i n and s t r a i n

r a t e i s r e l a t i v e l y unimportant compared w i t h the b a s i c idea

t h a t such a g e n e r a l r e l a t i o n s h i p e x i s t s .

I
T h i s s h o r t s e c t i o n on time-dependent s t u d i e s on

metals and p l a s t i c s has been i n c l u d e d to show t h a t s i m i l a r

r e s u l t s are o b t a i n e d f o r most e n g i n e e r i n g m a t e r i a l s , be they

metal, p l a s t i c , rubber or, as w i l l be shown, s a t u r a t e d c l a y .

The mechanism o f creep must be c o n s i d e r e d as a v e r y complex

phenomenon r e l a t e d t o i n t e r m o l e c u l a r f o r c e s and the "making

and b r e a k i n g " o f bonds. When c o n s i d e r i n g molecular behaviour

s a t u r a t e d c l a y i s b a s i c a l l y the same as other m a t e r i a l s , a l -

though having the c o m p l i c a t i n g aspect of being a two-phase

material. I t i s t h e r e f o r e p o s s i b l e t h a t the r e s u l t s of r e -

search on metals and p l a s t i c s may, i n f a c t , provide guide-

l i n e s f o r i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f the time-dependent behaviour o f

saturated clay.
- 14

2.3- Creep and Creep Rupture

Casagrande and W i l s o n (1951) i n v e s t i g a t e d the

e f f e c t o f creep l o a d i n g s on the shear s t r e n g t h of nine c l a y s .

Most of the t e s t s r e p o r t e d were unconfined compression t e s t s

i n which the l o a d was b u i l t up q u i c k l y and maintained con-

s t a n t u n t i l the specimen f a i l e d . The a p p l i c a t i o n of load

was achieved by applying f o u r to e i g h t increments of l o a d at

approximately one-minute i n t e r v a l s . For Mexico C i t y c l a y ,

the time to f a i l u r e was found to i n c r e a s e w i t h decreased

l o a d , w h i l e the l o g a r i t h m of the time to f a i l u r e was found

t o be l i n e a r l y r e l a t e d to the a p p l i e d s t r e s s . casagrande

and Wilson d e f i n e d f a i l u r e as o c c u r r i n g when the deformation

r a t e s t a r t e d to i n c r e a s e , s i n c e they o f t e n observed a fail-

ure plane d e v e l o p i n g s h o r t l y a f t e r the i n f l e c t i o n point in

the s t r a i n / t i m e curve.

G o l d s t e i n and Ter-Stepanian (1957) confirmed a

decrease i n s t r e n g t h w i t h i n c r e a s e d d u r a t i o n of loading.

They d e f i n e d the "long-term" s t r e n g t h as t h a t s t r e s s r e -

q u i r e d t o cause a f a i l u r e a f t e r a "long" p e r i o d of time.

Based upon a proposed model f o r s o i l comprising viscous and

b r i t t l e bonds, G o l d s t e i n suggested t h a t creep rupture


o c c u r r e d at a s p e c i f i c v a l u e of s t r a i n , independent of time

of l o a d i n g and stress l e v e l . Subsequently, r e s u l t s by

Sherif (1965) i n d i c a t e d t h a t creep r u p t u r e s t r a i n i s not

independent of s t r e s s l e v e l f o r a l l s o i l s .

Investigations by V i a l o v and Skibitsky (19 57) on

creep i n f r o z e n s o i l s showed deformations i n i t i a l l y occur-

r i n g at a d e c r e a s i n g r a t e , f o l l o w e d by a stage of creep at a
i

c o n s t a n t deformation r a t e and f i n a l l y r e s u l t i n g i n the ter-

t i a r y f a i l u r e stage. These o b s e r v a t i o n s were based upon the

r e s u l t s of t e s t s which i n v o l v e d shear along rods, initially

frozen in s o i l . V i a l o v and S k i b i t s k y suggested the exis-

tence of an u l t i m a t e continuous s t r e n g t h or upper y i e l d

s t r e n g t h based upon the r e s u l t of a t e s t which d i d not fail

w h i l e under l o a d f o r over f o u r y e a r s . D i r e c t shear t e s t s

performed on a dense t e r t i a r y c l a y a l s o i n d i c a t e d the exis-

tence of an upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h . V i a l o v and Skibitsky also

noted t h a t the h o r i z o n t a l deformation d u r i n g a d i r e c t shear

t e s t c o u l d be s a t i s f a c t o r i l y described by the equation:

y - a + b log t lo (2)

where: y = h o r i z o n t a l deformation
t = e l a p s e d time
a,b = constants
- 16

T h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p i s not t r u e f o r a l l s o i l s , as

the r e s u l t s of Campanella (1965) i n d i c a t e a d e f i n i t e c u r v a -

t u r e t o the s t r a i n / l o g a r i t h m time curve f o r t r i a x i a l com-

p r e s s i o n of remoulded 11lite.

Coates, Burn and McRostie (1963) p r e s e n t e d creep

r u p t u r e data f o r a v e r y s e n s i t i v e c l a y from E a s t e r n Canada,

which i n d i c a t e d t h a t an i n c r e a s e i n a p p l i e d shear s t r e s s r e -
i
j

s u i t e d i n decreased time t o f a i l u r e . The authors q u e s t i o n e d

whether the time to f a i l u r e should be d e f i n e d as the t o t a l

time t o r u p t u r e , or the time u n t i l the s t r a i n r a t e started

to i n c r e a s e . Most r e s e a r c h e r s use the f i r s t d e f i n i t i o n , a l -

though, as a l r e a d y mentioned, Casagrande and W i l s o n (1951)

used the l a t t e r . Coates, Burn and McRostie suggested that

c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s may p r o v i d e e q u i v a l e n t informa-

t i o n t o the c o n s t a n t s t r e s s t e s t , but d i d not suggest any

method f o r c o r r e l a t i o n of the r e s u l t s . As d i s c u s s e d , Pao

and Marin (1952) s u c c e s s f u l l y r e l a t e d r e s u l t s from these two

types of t e s t s on P l e x i g l a s . T h e r e f o r e , i t appears logical

to attempt such a c o r r e l a t i o n i n t h i s study, the r e s u l t s of

which are d i s c u s s e d i n Chapter 6.


- 17

A r e l a t i v e l y complete summary o f undrained creep

and s t r e n g t h behaviour f o r cohesive s o i l s i s t o be found i n

M i t c h e l l , Seed and Paduana (1965). In t h i s r e p o r t , the r e -

s u l t s o f many i n v e s t i g a t i o n s have been s u b d i v i d e d i n t o two

g r o u p s — t h o s e i n which a s t r e n g t h l o s s was noted and those

i n which e i t h e r no change or a s t r e n g t h g a i n was observed.

S t r e n g t h g a i n was observed o n l y f o r compacted samples w i t h


i
a h i g h percentage o f b e n t o n i t e , known t o be h i g h l y t h i x o -

tropic. Strength l o s s was observed f o r most s a t u r a t e d c l a y s

independent o f whether d i s t u r b e d , undisturbed, consolidated

or compacted.

Based upon the r e s u l t s o f a s e r i e s o f unconfined

creep t e s t s , S a i t o and Uezawa (1961) proposed a l i n e a r r e -

l a t i o n s h i p between t h e l o g a r i t h m o f t h e secondary s t r a i n

r a t e and the l o g a r i t h m o f the t o t a l e l a p s e d time t o rupture

(creep r u p t u r e life), as shown i n F i g u r e 3. Data used f o r

o b t a i n i n g t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p i n c l u d e d the r e s u l t s o f creep

t e s t s on f o u r n a t u r a l Japanese s o i l s and the r e s u l t s o f

Murayama and S h i b a t a (1956) , Casagrande and Wilson (1951)

and G o l d s t e i n and Ter-Stepanian (1957). Shown i n F i g u r e 3


- 18

100,000

10-3 10-2 10-' 100 10' 102

STRAIN RATE ( X I O " / MIN.)


4

(AFTER SAITO 8 UEZAWA, I 9 6 0

FIGURE 3 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CREEP RUPTURE


LIFE AND SECONDARY STRAIN RATE
- 19

i s the e r r o r band which e n c l o s e s 95 per cent of a l l the

tests (95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s ) . The equation of the

l i n e a r r e l a t i o n s h i p shown i n F i g u r e 3 i s of the form:

log t r = C - m log £ s (3)

where: t r = t o t a l e l a p s e d time u n t i l creep


r u p t u r e (creep r u p t u r e l i f e )

6S = secondary s t r a i n rate
i

• i
m,C = constants

When t r i s expressed i n minutes and £ s i s ex-

p r e s s e d i n 10~4 per minute, the equation, as e v a l u a t e d by

S a i t o and Uezawa, becomes:

log t r = 2.33 - .916 log £„ (4)

A c c o r d i n g to S a i t o and Uezawa, t h i s equation i s

v a l i d f o r d i f f e r e n t types of c l a y , c o n s o l i d a t i o n history

and drainage conditions.

I f the constant m i s assumed to be equal t o one,

then Equation 4 can be w r i t t e n as:

t r £ s = constant (5)
- 20

T h i s g i v e s a very simple r e l a t i o n s h i p which s t a t e s

t h a t the creep r u p t u r e l i f e i s i n v e r s e l y p r o p o r t i o n a l t o the

secondary strain rate.

A s i m i l a r c o r r e l a t i o n of creep r u p t u r e l i f e with

s t r a i n r a t e was presented by Monkman and Grant (1956) f o r

v a r i o u s metals. The d i f f e r e n c e between the S a i t o and Uezawa


i
and the Monkman and Grant r e l a t i o n s h i p s c e n t r e s around the

d e f i n i t i o n of the governing s t r a i n r a t e . Whereas S a i t o and

Uezawa used the secondary or c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e , Monkman

and Grant suggested t h a t a constant s t r a i n r a t e does not e x i s t

and used the minimum s t r a i n r a t e which occurred between primary

and t e r t i a r y creep. Therefore, Monkman and Grant proposed a

l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between the l o g a r i t h m of the t r a n s i e n t m i n i -

mum s t r a i n r a t e and the l o g a r i t h m of creep r u p t u r e l i f e . For

creep r u p t u r e t e s t s , the value o f the governing s t r a i n r a t e

obtained, assuming the e x i s t e n c e of a constant s t r a i n r a t e

or a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e , i s n e a r l y the same and,

t h e r e f o r e , the r e s u l t s of Monkman and Grant are comparable

w i t h those of S a i t o and Uezawa. I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o note

t h a t the Monkman and Grant 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e limits


- 21

for any one metal are i.55 l o g a r i t h m cycles, as compared w i t h

the S a i t o and Uezawa l i m i t s of —.59 logarithm cycles for a l l

soils. T h i s i s , perhaps, s u r p r i s i n g since metals are u s u a l l y

c o n s i d e r e d t o be more homogeneous than most n a t u r a l s o i l s .

However, as most s o i l s are more p l a s t i c than metals, non-

homogeneous areas w i t h i n a sample w i l l cause lower stress

c o n c e n t r a t i o n s i n a s o i l than i n a m e t a l . It i s possible
i
I

t h a t these f a c t o r s tend t o b a l a n c e one janother, g i v i n g the

same order o f magnitude of e r r o r band f o r b o t h metals and

s o i l s f o r the creep r u p t u r e c r i t e r i o n presented.

Having o b t a i n e d a l a b o r a t o r y h y p o t h e s i s f o r p r e -

d i c t i n g creep r u p t u r e , S a i t o and Uezawa proceeded t o apply

i t to f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s . Saito (1965) p r e s e n t e d a d d i t i o n a l

case h i s t o r i e s to c o n f i r m the a p p l i c a t i o n o f the h y p o t h e s i s

to f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s . These i n c l u d e d the i n v e s t i g a t i o n of

both n a t u r a l s l o p e s and f u l l - s c a l e experiments i n which

f a i l u r e was induced by s p r i n k l i n g water on the s l o p e . The

method used t o p r e d i c t the time o f f a i l u r e , as proposed by

S a i t o , r e q u i r e s the c o n t i n u a l measurement of d i s p l a c e m e n t

a c r o s s a t e n s i o n c r a c k a t the t o p o f the s l o p e . By dividing

the r a t e of displacement by the t o t a l l e n g t h of the s l o p e , a


- 22

s t r a i n rate i s obtained. Using t h i s s t r a i n rate, Equation 4

is solved for t r (the creep r u p t u r e l i f e ) , which i s then

claimed t o r e p r e s e n t the remaining time u n t i l f a i l u r e of the

slope. Although t h i s method appears t o be s a t i s f a c t o r y on

the b a s i s of the r e p o r t e d f i e l d s t u d i e s , i t can be criti-

c i z e d on s e v e r a l grounds, the most severe b e i n g t h a t the

laboratory t r was d e f i n e d as the creep r u p t u r e l i f e (time

from i n i t i a l l o a d i n g t o rupture) and t h i s has been used t o

p r e d i c t the remaining time u n t i l r u p t u r e a f t e r the measure-

ment of the f i e l d s t r a i n rate.

2.4 - Use of the Rate Process Theory


to P r e d i c t Creep Behaviour

i The r a t e process t h e o r y (Glasstone, L a i d l e r and

E y r i n g 1941) p o s t u l a t e s t h a t a s t a t i s t i c a l r a t e of bond

r u p t u r e occurs which i s dependent upon the thermal and

a c t i v a t i o n energy o f the bonds. As long as no shear f o r c e

is a p p l i e d t o a bond, the p r o b a b i l i t y of r u p t u r e i s equal

in a l l directions. However, a p p l i c a t i o n of a shear stress

to a cohesive s o i l a p p l i e s a net d i r e c t i o n a l component t o

the bond r u p t u r e s and t h e r e f o r e a deformation i s observed.


- 23

The r a t e process theory has been a p p l i e d t o the

creep deformation o f c l a y s by Murayama and S h i b a t a (1961,

1964), M i t c h e l l (1964), C h r i s t e n s e n and Wu (1964),

Campanella (1965) and M i t c h e l l , Campanella and Singh (1968) .

Murayama and S h i b a t a (1961) used the r a t e p r o c e s s t h e o r y t o

mathematically d e s c r i b e the n o n l i n e a r v i s c o s i t y o f the dash-


i
pot i n t h e i r r h e o l o g i c a l model. The e q u a t i o n f o r t h e i r
I
i

model, which was considered t o be a p p l i c a b l e f o r s t r e s s

l e v e l s below the upper y i e l d strength, follows:


cr g-cr 0 q-q 0

where: £ = strain

0" = d e v i a t o r s t r e s s

(7 = lower y i e l d s t r e n g t h o f s o i l ( f o r
0

s t r e s s below the lower y i e l d


s t r e n g t h t h e r e i s no time-dependent
deformation)

E,,E = e l a s t i c constants f o r s p r i n g e l e -
2

ments i n r h e o l o g i c a l model

A, B = c o n s t a n t s
2

t = time

T h i s equation p r e d i c t s a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between

and CT . Murayama and S h i b a t a (1961) proposed t h a t
d log t
- 24

d £
the f i r s t i n f l e c t i o n p o i n t of the , — -CJ curve occurs at
c
d log t

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h as shown i n F i g u r e 4. Murayama and

Shibata (1964) suggested another method f o r the evaluation

of the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h of c l a y s . Instead o f r e q u i r i n g

a s e r i e s of creep t e s t s , t h i s method uses the r e s u l t s of

o n l y one t e s t t o p r e d i c t the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h . The test

used f o r t h i s purpose i s a s t r e s s - c o n t r , o l l e d compression


i
i

t e s t i n which the compressive s t r e s s i s a p p l i e d i n equal

increments at uniform time i n t e r v a l s . R e s u l t s of such t e s t s

by Murayama and S h i b a t a show a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between the

l o g a r i t h m of d e v i a t o r s t r e s s and the l o g a r i t h m of strain.

The s t r e s s at which the f i r s t i n f l e c t i o n p o i n t occurs i s

proposed to be equal t o the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h as shown i n


i

F i g u r e 5. No j u s t i f i c a t i o n , based upon the r a t e process

theory or r h e o l o g i c a l model, was presented by Murayama and

S h i b a t a ; but, the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h o b t a i n e d by this

method was c o i n c i d e n t w i t h t h a t o b t a i n e d u s i n g the results

of a s e r i e s o f creep t e s t s on the same c l a y .

Christensen and Wu (1964) used the same approach

as Murayama and S h i b a t a and a p p l i e d the r a t e process theory

to d e s c r i b e the n o n l i n e a r v i s c o s i t y of the dashpot i n t h e i r


- 25

1
r r ,= 0.01 f
J.Y. - 1
I
=0 7

1
1
1
t
1

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0


(0~.-0" )3 Kg/cm 2

(AFTER MURAYAMA 8 SHIBATA, I960

FIGURE 4 - RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN de/dlogt AND (T


OBTAINED FROM CREEP TESTS

FIGURE 5 - INFLUENCE OF RATE OF STRESS


APPLICATION ON UPPER YIELD STRENGTH
OBTAINED FROM INCREMENTAL LOADING TESTS
T h e o l o g i c a l model. C h r i s t e n s e n and Wu assumed t h a t each

i n d i v i d u a l c o n t a c t has a lower y i e l d s t r e n g t h (the s t r e s s

below which flow does not occur) which i s not equal f o r

each c o n t a c t . T h e r e f o r e , s i n c e v e r y weak c o n t a c t s can

e x i s t , C h r i s t e n s e n and Wu s t a t e t h a t the macrobehaviour of

the s o i l may not e x h i b i t a lower y i e l d s t r e n g t h , which i s

c o n t r a r y t o the h y p o t h e s i s o f Murayama jand S h i b a t a (1961) .

Mitchell (1964), Campanella (1965), M i t c h e l l and

Campanella (1963), M i t c h e l l , Campanella and Singh (1968)

have used the r a t e p r o c e s s theory t o develop an equation

which p r e d i c t s the instantaneous s t r a i n r a t e d u r i n g a creep

test. T h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p i s a f u n c t i o n o f the s t r e s s ,

temperature, s o i l s t r u c t u r e and energy o f a c t i v a t i o n o f the

bonds a t the s o i l c o n t a c t s . T e s t s d e v i s e d by Campanella

(1965) permit the e v a l u a t i o n o f parameters i n t h i s equation

by a p p l y i n g r a p i d changes i n temperature and s t r e s s level

d u r i n g a creep t e s t . The main purpose o f t h e i r work has

been t o prove the v a l i d i t y o f t h e r a t e p r o c e s s t h e o r y as

a p p l i e d t o t h e shear behaviour of s o i l s , r a t h e r than u s i n g

it to d e s c r i b e the n o n l i n e a r behaviour o f a r h e o l o g i c a l model.

A t present, i n s u f f i c i e n t i n f o r m a t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e t o make

p r a c t i c a l use o f t h e i r equation.
- 27

Based upon a l a r g e amount of experimental data,

Singh and M i t c h e l l (1968) have proposed the f o l l o w i n g

phenomenological e q u a t i o n f o r creep of c o h e s i v e s o i l s :

6 = A (t ) m
exp ( a CT ) 0 (7)

where: £ = strain rate


oc,A,m = c o n s t a n t s |

t = e l a p s e d time j
<7 = a p p l i e d d e v i a t o r s t r e s s
0

i
This equation i s v a l i d only f o r s u b f a i l u r e condi-

t i o n s and p r e d i c t s a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between log £ and log t

f o r undrained creep t e s t s . Therefore, c o n t i n u a l l y -

d e c r e a s i n g s t r a i n r a t e s are p r e d i c t e d by t h i s e q u a t i o n and

a c o n s t a n t or secondary stage of creep would not be antici-


i
pated.

2.5 - E f f e c t of Time on
Strength Tests

Before p r e s e n t i n g the e f f e c t o f time on the shear

s t r e n g t h of c l a y s , i t i s n e c e s s a r y t o b r i e f l y d i s c u s s the

s t r e n g t h parameters which are used f o r e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s and

t o t a l stress analyses. The shear s t r e n g t h of s o i l s i s con-

s i d e r e d t o p r i m a r i l y r e s u l t from f r i c t i o n a l f o r c e s at the
- 28

c o n t a c t s between s o i l p a r t i c l e s . Thus, t h e shear s t r e n g t h

of s o i l s i s n o r m a l l y c o n s i d e r e d t o be a f u n c t i o n o f t h e

e f f e c t i v e normal s t r e s s e s , r a t h e r than t h e t o t a l normal

stresses. C o n v e n t i o n a l s o i l mechanics d e f i n e s t h e shear

strength parameters—cohesion (c') and f r i c t i o n (<£')—as the

i n t e r c e p t and s l o p e , r e s p e c t i v e l y , o f t h e e f f e c t i v e stress

Mohr-Coulomb f a i l u r e envelope: Two f a i l u r e c r i t e r i a are

commonly used i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t r i a x i a l t e s t i n g ; these

b e i n g the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s (C )MAX.


d and the maximum

principal effective stress ratio (^i' /CT ^ ) x.


MA failure criteria.

For d r a i n e d t e s t s , these c r i t e r i a a r e c o i n c i d e n t , b u t f o r

undrained t e s t s these c r i t e r i a o f t e n r e s u l t i n d i f f e r e n t

v a l u e s f o r t h e shear s t r e n g t h parameters, c' and <£' , depend-

i n g upon t h e type o f s o i l , c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y and dura-

t i o n of the t e s t .

The use o f t h e p r i n c i p l e o f e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s i n -

v o l v e s two s t e p s ; namely, t h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e shear

strength parameters— c> and — a n d the p r e d i c t i o n o f t h e

pore p r e s s u r e s . To a v o i d having t o p r e d i c t pore p r e s s u r e s ,

shear s t r e n g t h i s sometimes expressed i n terms o f t o t a l

stresses. The most common a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h i s approach i s


- 29

the = 0 analysis. T h i s a n a l y s i s i s based upon t h e r e s u l t s

of u n c o n s o l i d a t e d undrained. t r i a x i a l t e s t s on u n d i s t u r b e d

saturated c l a y s . Since the e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s a t the s t a r t

o f the t e s t a r e independent o f t h e c o n f i n i n g p r e s s u r e f o r

most c l a y s , t h e maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s i s not dependent

upon t h e i n i t i a l c o n f i n i n g p r e s s u r e . The undrained shear

s t r e n g t h i s , t h e r e f o r e , equal t o one-half o f t h e maximum

d e v i a t o r s t r e s s , although t h e s t r e n g t h joften quoted i s the

compressive s t r e n g t h o r maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s . The r e -

search reviewed i n S e c t i o n 2.3 i s based on compressive

s t r e n g t h and, i n f a c t , a l l a v a i l a b l e r e s e a r c h on creep rup-

t u r e o f c l a y s i s based upon t o t a l s t r e s s measurements.

Time e f f e c t s on compressive s t r e n g t h were r e p o r t e d

by T a y l o r (1948). Taylor presented r e s u l t s f o r t h e compres-

s i v e s t r e n g t h o f remoulded Boston b l u e c l a y , which showed an

increase i n strength with an i n c r e a s e i n t h e speed o f a x i a l

compression. Taylor a t t r i b u t e d the d i f f e r e n c e i n strength

to a v i s c o u s o r p l a s t i c r e s i s t a n c e which v a r i e d w i t h the

speed a t which the shear s t r a i n o c c u r r e d . Casagrande and

Wilson (1951) r e p o r t e d i n c r e a s e d compressive s t r e n g t h with

i n c r e a s e d r a t e s o f l o a d i n g on Mexico C i t y c l a y . As t h e r a t e
- 30

of l o a d i n g was i n c r e a s e d , t h e r u p t u r e s t r a i n was noted t o

decrease. These t e s t s were performed by adding predetermined

increments o f s t r e s s a t s e t i n t e r v a l s o f t i m e . On t h e other

hand, Casagrande and W i l s o n a l s o r e p o r t e d t h a t , f o r a com-

pacted c l a y e y sand, the compressive s t r e n g t h i n c r e a s e d with

decreased r a t e s o f l o a d i n g , accompanied w i t h an i n c r e a s e i n

rupture strain. However, t h i s s o i l was o n l y partially


j

s a t u r a t e d and, t h e r e f o r e , t h i s i n c r e a s e i n s t r e n g t h with

time may be due t o c o n s o l i d a t i o n e f f e c t s .

P e r l o f f and. O s t e r b e r g (1963) i n v e s t i g a t e d t h e

e f f e c t o f v a r i o u s s t r a i n r a t e s on remoulded i l l i t e . Un-

d r a i n e d t r i a x i a l t e s t s were performed f o r v a r i o u s consoli-

d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s , r a n g i n g between normally' c o n s o l i d a t e d and

an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o o f 20. F o r remoulded illite,

P e r l o f f and O s t e r b e r g r e p o r t e d t h a t t h e g r e a t e r the overcon-

s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o t h e g r e a t e r the e f f e c t o f s t r a i n r a t e on

the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s . The e f f e c t o f s t r a i n r a t e on

the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s was t h e same as p r e v i o u s l y r e -

p o r t e d by o t h e r s . For normally consolidated i l l i t e , the

v a r i a t i o n i n t h e maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s was s m a l l f o r t h e

range o f s t r a i n r a t e s t e s t e d . T h i s may i n d i c a t e t h e
- 31

importance o f s t r u c t u r e on the e f f e c t o f s t r a i n r a t e on the

maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s , s i n c e f o r normally consolidated

remoulded i l l i t e , which would have a d i s p e r s e d s t r u c t u r e , the

effect of strain rate i s small. Whereas f o r t h e overcon-

solidated i l l i t e , the e f f e c t of s t r a i n r a t e i s l a r g e r ,

p o s s i b l y due t o t h e s t r u c t u r a l bonds c r e a t e d by o v e r c o n s o l i -

dation.

Bjerrum, Simons and T o r b l a a (1958) r e p o r t e d de-

creased compressive s t r e n g t h w i t h i n c r e a s i n g time t o f a i l u r e

for a s o f t marine c l a y . The t e s t i n g program c o n s i s t e d o f a

s e r i e s o f normally c o n s o l i d a t e d undrained t r i a x i a l t e s t s a t

widely different strain rates. I t was found t h a t <p , t h e


l

e f f e c t i v e angle o f f r i c t i o n , a l s o decreased w i t h increasing

time t o f a i l u r e , w i t h f a i l u r e d e f i n e d a t t h e maximum d e v i a -

tor stress. The v a l i d i t y o f t h i s r e s u l t i s somewhat ques-

t i o n a b l e , s i n c e Bjerrum, e t a l , admitted t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f

leakage o f water through t h e membrane i n t o t h e sample.

Results o f normally consolidated drained t e s t s a t

v a r i o u s s t r a i n r a t e s r e s u l t e d i n no change i n shear strength

w i t h v a r i a t i o n s i n time t o f a i l u r e . I t was suggested t h a t

any decrease i n s t r e n g t h due t o i n c r e a s e d time t o f a i l u r e


- 32

was compensated f o r by an i n c r e a s e i n strength due t o an

a d d i t i o n a l volume decrease from secondary compression.

Crawford (1959) i n v e s t i g a t e d the influence of

s t r a i n r a t e on t h e e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s i n a sensitive clay

from E a s t e r n Canada. The maximum d e v i a t o r stress of s t r a i n

r a t e c o n t r o l l e d undrained t r i a x i a l t e s t s was found t o de-

crease l i n e a r l y w i t h t h e l o g a r i t h m o f t h e time t o f a i l u r e .

The e f f e c t i v e angle o f f r i c t i o n , <p' , a t maximum deviator

stress, increased w i t h time t o f a i l u r e . This i s the exact

o p p o s i t e o f t h e r e s u l t s o f Bjerrum, e t a l .

The r e s u l t s o f Bjerrum, e t a l , and Crawford indi-

cate t h a t t h e e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s s t r e n g t h parameters o b t a i n e d

from undrained t r i a x i a l t e s t s a r e a f f e c t e d by t h e t e s t i n g
i
rate i f f a i l u r e i s defined as o c c u r r i n g a t t h e maximum de-

viator stress. Unfortunately, the t r i a x i a l t e s t s i n both

i n v e s t i g a t i o n s were d i s c o n t i n u e d b e f o r e t h e maximum p r i n c i -

p a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o was reached and, t h e r e f o r e , t h e

e f f e c t o f time on t h e shear s t r e n g t h parameters measured a t

the maximum p r i n c i p a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o i s unknown.

As mentioned p r e v i o u s l y , r e s e a r c h on creep rup-

t u r e o f c l a y s has been i n v e s t i g a t e d i n terms o f t o t a l


- 33

stresses. Therefore, i n an attempt t o extend the b a s i c

understanding o f undrained creep, pore p r e s s u r e s were mea-

sured throughout a l l t e s t s i n t h e r e s e a r c h t o be d e s c r i b e d .

2.6 - Summary

Creep f a i l u r e s have been observed i n the f i e l d .

A b e t t e r understanding o f t h e mechanism and time-dependent

behaviour o f s o i l deformation might enable p r e d i c t i o n o f

these failures.

S i m i l a r s t r e s s / s t r a i n / t i m e behaviour has been ob-

served f o r many e n g i n e e r i n g m a t e r i a l s . Therefore, i t may be

p o s s i b l e t o s u c c e s s f u l l y apply t h e o r i e s proposed f o r metals

and p l a s t i c s t o t h e creep o f s a t u r a t e d c l a y s .

There i s c o n s i d e r a b l e agreement w i t h i n t h e l i t e r a -

t u r e t h a t a decreased compressive strength i s associated

w i t h i n c r e a s e d time t o f a i l u r e f o r b o t h c o n s t a n t s t r e s s and

constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s on s a t u r a t e d c o h e s i v e soils.

A t p r e s e n t , no t h e o r y e x i s t s which permits t h e

p r e d i c t i o n o f a creep t e s t from t h e r e s u l t s o f constant

s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s f o r shear o f s a t u r a t e d c l a y s .

Undrained creep r u p t u r e o f c l a y has o n l y been i n -

v e s t i g a t e d i n terms o f t o t a l s t r e s s e s .
- 34

CHAPTER 3

LABORATORY TESTING

3.1 - D e s c r i p t i o n of C l a y

The c l a y used i n t h i s study was o b t a i n e d from an

open p i t which belonged t o the Haney B r i c k and T i l e Co. L t d . ,

Haney, B.C. T h i s p i t i s l o c a t e d about 20 m i l e s e a s t of

Vancouver on the n o r t h bank of the F r a s e r R i v e r . Block

samples were o b t a i n e d i n August, 1965, by d i g g i n g a p i t

around an u n d i s t u r b e d mass of c l a y about t h r e e f e e t square.

Then, by c a r e f u l l y c u t t i n g the c l a y w i t h piano wire, blocks

of c l a y , approximately one c u b i c f o o t i n s i z e , were removed.

These b l o c k s were waxed i n the f i e l d and t r a n s p o r t e d t o the

U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h Columbia S o i l s L a b o r a t o r y where a d d i -

t i o n a l coatings o f wax were a p p l i e d . The b l o c k s were s t o r e d

i n a moist room u n t i l r e q u i r e d . Although the t e s t i n g program

extended over a two-year p e r i o d , no n o t i c e a b l e change i n

water content was obs'erved and, t h e r e f o r e , the method of s t o r -

age i s assumed t o have been adequate.

T h i s c l a y , which w i l l be r e f e r r e d t o as Haney c l a y ,

has been used f o r r e s e a r c h by others a t U.B.C. (Byrne 1966,

H i r s t 1966, Gupta 1967, Lou 1967). Haney c l a y , a c c o r d i n g t o


- 35

Armstrong (1957), i s a g l a c i o - m a r i n e d e p o s i t l a i d down i n

f r o n t of and beneath the i c e of the Sumas V a l l e y g l a c i a t i o n

which o c c u r r e d about 11,000 years ago. Due t o rebound of the

area w i t h the r e t r e a t of the i c e , the area i s now above sea

l e v e l and, as a r e s u l t of l e a c h i n g over the ensuing years,

Haney c l a y now has a sensitive structure. Armstrong d e f i n e s

it as a p l a s t i c marine s i l t y c l a y , w i t h c l a y 46 per cent,

silt 42.5 per cent and f i n e sand 11.5 per c e n t . The clay ob-

t a i n e d from the open p i t , b e i n g s l i g h t l y l e s s sandy, had clay

46 per cent, s i l t 51 per cent and f i n e sand 3 per cent, based

on the M.I.T. g r a i n s i z e c l a s s i f i c a t i o n . Table I gives typi-

cal p h y s i c a l p r o p e r t i e s of Haney c l a y .

Standard one-dimensional c o n s o l i d a t i o n t e s t s were

run t o o b t a i n the p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n p r e s s u r e . A v a l u e of

approximately 38 p s i f o r the p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n p r e s s u r e was

obtained, which was i n agreement w i t h the r e s u l t s of Byrne

(1966) and H i r s t (1966). In the a n a l y s i s of the shape of

s t r e s s paths f o r d r a i n e d t e s t s , i n i t i a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d t o 40

psi (Byrne 1966), a c o n s i d e r a b l e e f f e c t a p p a r e n t l y due to

p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n c o u l d s t i l l be observed. S i n c e i t was de-

s i r e d t o e l i m i n a t e the e f f e c t of p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n , an
- 36

TABLE I

P h y s i c a l P r o p e r t i e s of
Haney C l a y

Specific gravity 2.80

Liquid l i m i t 50 per cent

Plastic limit 27 per cent

P l a s t i c i t y index 23 per cent

N a t u r a l water content 41.5 p e r cent


±1 per cent

Per cent f i n e r than two

microns 46 per cent

Activity 0.5

Undisturbed unconfined
compressive s t r e n g t h 1,650 p s f
Remoulded unconfined
compressive s t r e n g t h 330 p s f

Sensitivity* 5

*Sensitivity = Undisturbed u n c o n f i n e d compressive s t r e n g t h


Remoulded unconfined compressive
s t r e n g t h a t 20 p e r cent a x i a l s t r a i n
i s o t r o p i c c o n s o l i d a t i o n t e s t was performed i n t r i a x i a l equip-

ment t o i n v e s t i g a t e whether the type o f c o n s o l i d a t i o n

a f f e c t e d the apparent p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n pressure. The i s o -

t r o p i c c o n s o l i d a t i o n t e s t e s t i m a t e d the p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n

p r e s s u r e a t 50 p s i , about 30 per cent h i g h e r than t h a t obtained

from one-dimensional c o n s o l i d a t i o n . To ensure e l i m i n a t i o n o f

the e f f e c t o f p r e c o n s o l i d a t i o n i n the t e s t i n g program, i t was I

decided t o i s o t r o p i c a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e a l l samples t o an e f f e c - ,

t i v e s t r e s s o f 75 p s i .

3.2 - Development o f T e s t i n g Program

The development o f a t e s t i n g program t o i n v e s t i g a t e

creep r u p t u r e r e q u i r e s an understanding o f the e f f e c t s o f

c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y and drainage c o n d i t i o n s on the compres-

sive strength of clay.

I t i s w e l l known t h a t , when n o r m a l l y consolidated

c l a y s are sheared w i t h f u l l drainage, there i s a decrease i n

volume; while, i n the undrained c o n d i t i o n , the tendency f o r

volume decrease i s r e f l e c t e d by a pore water p r e s s u r e i n -

crease. Thus, f o r a n o r m a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y , a lower

compressive s t r e n g t h i s o b t a i n e d from t h e undrained t e s t ,

assuming the same t o t a l s t r e s s path t o f a i l u r e .


- 38

Throughout the remainder of t h i s s e c t i o n , whenever

the r e l a t i v e magnitudes o f compressive s t r e n g t h obtained from

d r a i n e d and undrained t r i a x i a l t e s t s are compared, i t must be

understood t h a t these comparisons apply only t o d r a i n e d and

undrained t e s t s which have been s u b j e c t e d t o the same t o t a l

s t r e s s path and the same i n i t i a l consolidation history.

Heavily overconsolidated c l a y s , upon s h e a r i n g i n

the d r a i n e d c o n d i t i o n , absorb water and an i n c r e a s e i n volume

results. I f sheared i n an undrained c o n d i t i o n , the pore

water pressure decreases and the e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s i n c r e a s e . .

Therefore, f o r a heavily overconsolidated c l a y , a lower com-

pressive strength i s obtained from the d r a i n e d t e s t . For

most c l a y s , w i t h an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o o f between four

and s i x , there i s l i t t l e tendency f o r volume change d u r i n g

shear and, t h e r e f o r e , d r a i n e d and undrained compressive

s t r e n g t h s a r e n e a r l y the same (Roscoe, S c h o f i e l d and Wroth

1958).

Therefore, depending upon the c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y

of a c l a y , a lower compressive s t r e n g t h may be measured from

e i t h e r a d r a i n e d or undrained test. As a r e s u l t , should

creep s t u d i e s be performed f o r both d r a i n e d and undrained

conditions? C e r t a i n l y , f o r the c o n s i d e r a t i o n of long-term


- 39

behaviour, the assumption t h a t a s o i l i s completely d r a i n e d

does not seem unreasonable, b u t can undrained creep occur

under f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s ? I t i s suggested t h a t the slow move-

ment of some e x t e n s i v e h i l l s i d e s i s the r e s u l t of s h e a r i n g of

t h i c k l a y e r s of c l a y which have such low p e r m e a b i l i t i e s and

long drainage paths t h a t drainage i s e f f e c t i v e l y zero, even

over a c o n s i d e r a b l e l e n g t h of time. T h i s c o n d i t i o n would be

e q u i v a l e n t t o the undrained creep o f c l a y and, t h e r e f o r e , un- ,

d r a i n e d creep i s c o n s i d e r e d t o have p r a c t i c a l significance.

I f drainage i s allowed d u r i n g creep of a n o r m a l l y

c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y , the r e s u l t i n g i n c r e a s e i n compressive

s t r e n g t h due to the decrease i n volume w i l l reduce the p o s s i -

b i l i t y of a f a i l u r e due t o l o s s of s t r e n g t h w i t h time.

T h e r e f o r e , the undrained c o n d i t i o n i s the c o n t r o l l i n g drain-

age c o n d i t i o n under which a creep r u p t u r e f a i l u r e w i l l occur.

A n o r m a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y s u b j e c t e d to a creep l o a d i n g

w i l l not f a i l i n a d r a i n e d or p a r t i a l l y - d r a i n e d condition,

s i n c e i t would have a l r e a d y f a i l e d i n an undrained condition

at an e a r l i e r stage of the t e s t . Again, i t must be remembered

t h a t t h i s a p p l i e s o n l y i f the t o t a l s t r e s s paths are the same.


- 40

For l i g h t l y overconsolidated clay (overconsolida-

t i o n r a t i o s of between four and s i x ) , the s m a l l d i f f e r e n c e i n

compressive s t r e n g t h between d r a i n e d and undrained conditions

allows i n v e s t i g a t i o n o f creep r u p t u r e i n e i t h e r the d r a i n e d

or undrained s t a t e ^

Although a h e a v i l y o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d clay subjected

to a creep l o a d i n g may f a i l due t o a decrease i n undrained

s t r e n g t h w i t h time, a d d i t i o n a l s o f t e n i n g w i t h drainage (which

may r e q u i r e c o n s i d e r a b l e time) w i l l c e r t a i n l y reduce the

s t r e n g t h t o a minimum. Therefore, t o f u l l y i n v e s t i g a t e the

e f f e c t of time on the compressive s t r e n g t h o f a h e a v i l y over-

c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y , drainage must be p e r m i t t e d . This should

not be i n t e r p r e t e d , however, as s u g g e s t i n g t h a t a creep

f a i l u r e would take p l a c e i n a completely drained condition,

but r a t h e r t h a t the s o f t e n i n g w i t h time from a d d i t i o n a l water

c o n t r i b u t e s t o the i n i t i a t i o n o f the f a i l u r e . As f a i l u r e i s

approached, deformation r a t e s i n c r e a s e and, a t f a i l u r e , nega-

t i v e pore p r e s s u r e s w i l l not be d i s s i p a t e d .

A change o f temperature d u r i n g an undrained tri-

a x i a l t e s t on s a t u r a t e d c l a y i s known t o a f f e c t the pore

pressure. T h i s change i n pore water p r e s s u r e , i n turn.


- 41

d i r e c t l y a f f e c t s the e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s and thus the s t r e n g t h

of a sample. T h e r e f o r e , t o e l i m i n a t e random temperature

e f f e c t s , c o n t r o l s h o u l d be maintained over the temperature

while t e s t i n g . Normally, t h i s e n t a i l s r e d u c i n g temperature

f l u c t u a t i o n s t o a p r a c t i c a l minimum, but i n c e r t a i n cases

c o n t r o l l e d changes i n temperature have been used i n t e s t i n g

programs. Campanella (1965) used a temperature change d u r i n g

creep t e s t s t o e v a l u a t e parameters i n the r a t e p r o c e s s equa-

tion. Under f i e l d c o n d i t i o n s , temperature changes a t depth

are n o r m a l l y s m a l l and s e a s o n a l i n f l u c t u a t i o n and, there-

f o r e , a l l t e s t s i n t h i s program were performed at c o n s t a n t

temperature. To do t h i s , an e n c l o s u r e was b u i l t around a l l

the n e c e s s a r y t e s t i n g equipment and a s m a l l a i r c o n d i t i o n e r

was used t o m a i n t a i n the temperature a t 20 degrees C, ^0.5

degrees C.

The t e s t i n g program f o r t h i s t h e s i s was planned t o

i n c l u d e undrained t e s t s w i t h the f o l l o w i n g consolidation

h i s t o r i e s — n o r m a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d and o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d w i t h

o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o s o f two and s i x . To i n v e s t i g a t e the

behaviour o f h e a v i l y o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y , d r a i n e d and un-

d r a i n e d t e s t s w i t h an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o o f 25 were
- 42

performed. A l l samples were i n i t i a l l y normally consolidated

to an e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s of 75 p s i and rebounded to the d e s i r e d

final effective stress. The o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o , 77 , as

used i n t h i s t h e s i s , i s the r a t i o of the normally consoli-

dated e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s (75 p s i ) to the o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d or

"rebounded" e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s .

During a l l creep t e s t s , s m a l l a d d i t i o n a l loads were

c o n t i n u o u s l y p l a c e d on the sample t o maintain the d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s a t a constant v a l u e . Large samples were used i n order

to get reasonable c o n s i s t e n c y between t e s t s on n a t u r a l u n d i s -

turbed Haney c l a y . Thus, i n s t e a d of u s i n g the more conven-

t i o n a l 1.4-inch by 2.8-inch t r i a x i a l sample, 2.5-inch by 5.0-

i n c h samples were trimmed from the b l o c k samples. As soon

as the sample s i z e i s i n c r e a s e d , c o n s o l i d a t i o n times are con-

siderably increased also. To reduce c o n s o l i d a t i o n times by

convenient means, double drainage and slit continuous filter

paper (Whatman No. 54) s i d e d r a i n s were used. T h i s procedure

reduced the t h e o r e t i c a l time f o r 100 per cent c o n s o l i d a t i o n

to about 45 minutes.

Pore water p r e s s u r e s were measured a t the base

stone of the sample d u r i n g a l l undrained tests using an


- 43

e l e c t r i c a l p r e s s u r e t r a n s d u c e r (manufactured by Data Sensors

Inc.). When measuring pore water p r e s s u r e s , care must be

taken t o ensure t h a t the p r e s s u r e i n d i c a t e d by the measuring

system i s the pore p r e s s u r e w i t h i n the sample. Two errors

which e x i s t i n the measurement o f pore water p r e s s u r e s i n the

t r i a x i a l t e s t are:

(1) - The t i m e - l a g i n response o f the measuring apparatus due

to i t s compliance; and

(2) - The nonuniform pore water p r e s s u r e w i t h i n the sample

due t o nonuniform s t r e s s conditions.

The response time o f the measuring apparatus i s a

f u n c t i o n o f the compliance o f the measuring system, the p e r -

m e a b i l i t y o f the sample and the area over which the pore

water p r e s s u r e i s measured. Based on a r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r

piezometers (Penman 1960), the time r e q u i r e d to measure 95

per cent o f an i n s t a n t a n e o u s p r e s s u r e change w i t h i n the

sample would be under 30 seconds f o r the measuring system

used i n t h i s t e s t i n g program. C o n s i d e r a t i o n was g i v e n t o the

use of hyperdermic needle pore p r e s s u r e probes to measure the


- 44

p r e s s u r e s a t v a r i o u s l e v e l s w i t h i n the sample. T h i s i d e a was

d i s c a r d e d when i t was r e a l i z e d t h a t i t would take about 20

minutes t o r e g i s t e r 95 per c e n t o f a p r e s s u r e change. This

d i f f e r e n c e i n response times i s due o n l y t o the d i f f e r e n c e i n

area over which the p r e s s u r e i s b e i n g measured; the l a r g e r

the area, the q u i c k e r the water can be withdrawn from the

sample t o accommodate the compliance o f the measuring system

without g r e a t l y a f f e c t i n g the pore p r e s s u r e i n the sample.

Even though a measuring system i s v e r y " s t i f f , " the response

time o f the apparatus s h o u l d be i n v e s t i g a t e d when t e s t i n g

s o i l s w i t h low p e r m e a b i l i t i e s .

Nonuniformity o f s t r e s s w i t h i n the t r i a x i a l speci-

men due t o end r e s t r a i n t s r e s u l t s i n nonuniform pore water

p r e s s u r e s throughout the sample ( B l i g h t 1963) . Testing at a

slow r a t e w i l l ensure time f o r m i g r a t i o n o f pore water t o

balance the nonuniform p r e s s u r e s . This r e s u l t s i n small

changes t o v o i d r a t i o w i t h i n the sample, although the average

v o i d r a t i o f o r the sample does n o t change. According to

Blight, f o r Haney c l a y w i t h a c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o n s o l i d a t i o n ,

c ,
y equal t o 7 x 1 0 ~ 4
cm /sec, the t e s t d u r a t i o n f o r 95 p e r
2

cent e q u a l i z a t i o n o f pore p r e s s u r e s h o u l d be about one hour


- 45

for 2.5-inch by 5.0-inch samples w i t h s i d e d r a i n s . Theoreti-

cally, t h i s would be the l e n g t h o f time b e f o r e any measured

pore p r e s s u r e c o u l d be expected t o be 95 per cent accurate

and, t h e r e f o r e , would g i v e an i n d i c a t i o n o f the l e n g t h o f

time a f t e r creep l o a d i n g b e f o r e pore p r e s s u r e measurements

can be t r u s t e d .

The n o n u n i f o r m i t y o f s t r e s s e s can be reduced by the

use o f f r i c t i o n l e s s end p l a t e n s (Rowe and Barden 1964); but,

f r i c t i o n l e s s end p l a t e n s reduce the area over which base pore

p r e s s u r e measurements can be made. T h e r e f o r e , although non-

uniform pore p r e s s u r e s a r e reduced, t h e response time o f the

pore p r e s s u r e measuring system i s i n c r e a s e d . This situation

can be improved i f a method i s d e v i s e d t o connect the s i d e

d r a i n s t o the pore p r e s s u r e measuring apparatus without

a f f e c t i n g the f r i c t i o n l e s s end p l a t e n s . I t should be r e a -

l i z e d t h a t , f o r c l a y w i t h low p e r m e a b i l i t y , i t i s not always

p o s s i b l e t o s a t i s f y both c r i t e r i a f o r q u i c k response o f pore

p r e s s u r e measurements.

In order t o estimate the compressive s t r e s s which,

when a p p l i e d t o c o n s o l i d a t e d samples, would e v e n t u a l l y cause

a creep r u p t u r e f a i l u r e , i t was necessary t o perform a


- 46

standard s t r e n g t h t e s t . T h e r e f o r e , f o r each c o n s o l i d a t i o n

h i s t o r y a standard s t r e n g t h t e s t was performed u s i n g the same

t e s t i n g apparatus as used i n the creep s t u d i e s . For the pur-

pose of t h i s t h e s i s , the standard s t r e n g t h t e s t was d e f i n e d

as an i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t i n which the r a t e of load

application (i.e., one k i l o g r a m every three minutes) was

maintained u n t i l f a i l u r e occurred. In these t e s t s , the r a t e

of l o a d i n g was chosen such t h a t f a i l u r e would take p l a c e

a f t e r approximately s i x hours of l o a d i n g .

During the i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t , readings were

taken at the end of each l o a d i n g s t e p . These l o a d i n g steps

were i n t e n s i o n a l l y kept s m a l l , never exceeding about 4 per

cent o f the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s . However, near failure,

these increments were f u r t h e r reduced and the frequency of

l o a d i n g s i n c r e a s e d t o m a i n t a i n a constant r a t e o f l o a d i n g

throughout the complete t e s t . S t r a i n r a t e s d u r i n g the t e s t

were c a l c u l a t e d by the same method used f o r the creep tests

(see Appendix B ) . I t should be noted t h a t these strain

r a t e s may be s l i g h t l y i n e r r o r s i n c e t h i s method r e q u i r e s

three s t r a i n and time readings, and d u r i n g the i n c r e m e n t a l

loadings t e s t s , the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s was not constant f o r

these three r e a d i n g s . However, as a l r e a d y mentioned, the


- 47

v a r i a t i o n i n deviator s t r e s s between adjacent readings was

small.

In the l a t t e r stage of the t e s t i n g program, con-

stant s t r a i n r a t e t r i a x i a l t e s t s were performed on samples

w i t h the same c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s as those o f the creep

series. The r e s u l t s from these t e s t s were used t o c o r r e l a t e

data between constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s and creep t e s t s . To

ensure t h a t c o r r e l a t i o n was p o s s i b l e , both s e r i e s of t e s t s

were performed on samples obtained from the same group of

b l o c k samples. Due t o a shortage o f c l a y , i t was necessary

t o r e s o r t t o performing some constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s on

1.4-inch by 2.8-inch samples. This l e d to c e r t a i n difficul-

t i e s i n c o r r e l a t i n g data due t o d i f f e r e n c e s i n s i d e d r a i n and

membrane e f f e c t s .

Details of t e s t equipment and t e s t procedures are

presented i n Appendix A and an e x p l a n a t i o n of the parameters

calculated from the t e s t s , together with a few t y p i c a l com-

puter outputs of reduced data, i s presented i n Appendix B.


- 48

i CHAPTER 4

RESULTS OF CREEP RUPTURE TESTS

4.1 - Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

on Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Samples

All samples i n t h i s s e r i e s were allowed to con-

s o l i d a t e f o r 36 hours, a t which time the average water con-

t e n t was 32.2 p e r cent w i t h a s t a n d a r d d e v i a t i o n of the

average equal t o -0.2 per c e n t . At the end o f the t e s t s ,

water c o n t e n t s were found t o be, on an average, 0.4 per cent

above t h a t determined by the sample s i d e trimmings at the

s t a r t o f the t e s t and volume change measurements d u r i n g the


[

t e s t . • For the 2.5-inch by 5.0-inch samples, t h i s amounted

to about 2.1 grams o f excess water. I t was b e l i e v e d that

t h i s excess water came from the f i l t e r paper s i d e d r a i n s . To

check t h i s , a filter paper s i d e d r a i n was weighed dripping

wet, as when i n s t a l l e d on the sample, and again a f t e r b e i n g

removed from a sample a t the end o f the t e s t . The filter

paper was n o t i c e a b l y d r i e r upon removal, due t o s m a l l pore

water t e n s i o n s drawing water from the s i d e d r a i n s . In f a c t ,

the d i f f e r e n c e i n weight was approximately 2.5 grams, which

more than accounted f o r the excess o f water a l r e a d y mentioned.


- 49

T h i s confirmed the source of the 0.4 per cent excess water

and, t h e r e f o r e , leakage o f water through the membranes or

around the 0 - r i n g s e a l s was negligible.

A f t e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n was completed, samples were

l e f t undrained f o r e i g h t hours. During t h i s time, a pore

p r e s s u r e b u i l d - u p was observed which had an average v a l u e of

-2.6 p s i d u r i n g the 8-hour p e r i o d . F i g u r e 6 shows the t y p i -

c a l shape o f the pore p r e s s u r e b u i l d - u p d u r i n g the 8-hour

period. At f i r s t , i t might be thought t h a t t h i s pore p r e s -

sure i n c r e a s e was due t o leakage, but, i f so, the pore p r e s s u r e

i n c r e a s e would l i k e l y be approximately l i n e a r w i t h time. As

d i s c u s s e d , water contents b e f o r e and a f t e r t e s t s checked

quite s a t i s f a c t o r i l y . To e x p l a i n t h i s pore p r e s s u r e i n c r e a s e ,

c o n s i d e r the sample j u s t b e f o r e the drainage was closed o f f .

A c c o r d i n g to c l a s s i c a l T e r z a g h i c o n s o l i d a t i o n theory, primary

c o n s o l i d a t i o n had been completed f o r at l e a s t 34 hours, but

secondary compression was still continuing. Thus, the pore

p r e s s u r e r i s e i s c o n s i d e r e d t o be a r e f l e c t i o n of the t e n -

dency f o r c o n t i n u e d secondary compression a f t e r the drainage

l i n e s were c l o s e d . T h i s was i n v e s t i g a t e d by a t e s t which was

c o n s o l i d a t e d f o r 24 hours i n s t e a d of 36 hours. S i n c e the


FIGURE 6 - TYPICAL PORE PRESSURE BUILD-UP
AFTER 36 HOURS OF CONSOLIDATION
- 51

secondary compression remaining to take p l a c e a f t e r 24-hour

c o n s o l i d a t i o n i s g r e a t e r than t h a t remaining a f t e r 36-hour

c o n s o l i d a t i o n , i t would be expected t h a t a l a r g e r pore p r e s -

sure r i s e d u r i n g an 8-hour p e r i o d would o c c u r . This was

confirmed by the t e s t c o n s o l i d a t e d f o r 24 hours, which had a

pore p r e s s u r e r i s e of 8.1 p s i i n s t e a d of the 2.6 p s i mentioned

e a r l i e r f o r 36-hour c o n s o l i d a t i o n . These r e s u l t s are s i m i l a r

t o those observed by Lou (1967) and d i s c u s s e d by Byrne (1966).

Once the magnitude of the pore p r e s s u r e r i s e t o be

expected had been determined by a few t e s t s , t h i s became an

extremely v a l u a b l e way of d e t e r m i n i n g whether t h e r e was any

leakage. I f the pore p r e s s u r e r o s e s i x or seven p s i d u r i n g

the 8-hour p e r i o d , leakage i n t o the sample was indicated and

was l a t e r confirmed by a water content check at the end of

the t e s t . Some t e s t s run i n t h i s e x p e r i m e n t a l program had t o

be d e l e t e d due to leakage. The t e s t s to which t h i s applied

were some of the t e s t s i n which the membranes were b e i n g

used f o r a second time.

An i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t gave a maximum d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s of 52.0 p s i a t an a x i a l s t r a i n of about 4.3 per c e n t .

U s i n g t h i s v a l u e as a r e f e r e n c e compressive strength, creep


- 52

r u p t u r e t e s t s were run at d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s of 51.3, 48.3,

46.3, 44.9, 43.7, 43.4 and 42.8 psi. F i g u r e 7 shows

the t y p i c a l s t r a i n / t i m e and pore p r e s s u r e / t i m e curves f o r a

creep r u p t u r e t e s t on n o r m a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney c l a y . The

data are from T e s t C-6, which was loaded w i t h a d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s of 43.7 psi. I t s h o u l d be noted t h a t i t would not be

difficult t o d i v i d e t h i s s t r a i n / t i m e curve i n t o the standard

s e c t i o n s ; namely, primary creep, secondary creep and tertiary

creep.

The pore water p r e s s u r e r o s e c o n t i n u a l l y d u r i n g the

t e s t and t h e r e was no change i n c u r v a t u r e or n o t i c e a b l e d i s -

c o n t i n u i t y i n the pore water p r e s s u r e curve d u r i n g the p e r i o d

of secondary creep. Yet, the s t r a i n r a t e was decreasing i n

the e a r l y stages o f the t e s t and i n c r e a s i n g at the end. It

would appear d i f f i c u l t , then, t o p r e d i c t t h a t the sample was

going t o r u p t u r e at a l a t e r stage i n the t e s t based upon the

pore p r e s s u r e measurements.

As a l r e a d y mentioned i n S e c t i o n 3.2, the theoreti-

cal e q u a l i z a t i o n time f o r nonuniform pore p r e s s u r e s was of

the order of one hour. F i g u r e 8 shows the pore p r e s s u r e /

s t r a i n curve f o r T e s t C-6 and a d o t t e d l i n e which shows a


- 53
20

15

<
cr
h- 10
co

_i
<
X
<

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

80

(
60

o.
LLI

tr 40
CO
cn
UJ
cr HANEY CLAY
Q_
0 3 c
:
7 5 psi
TEST N o . C-(
o
a. 20

500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 7 - UNDRAINED CREEP TEST


NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED
- 54

0 I 2 3 4 5 6

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 8 - PORE PRESSURE / STRAIN CURVE


NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED
- 55

suggested c o r r e c t pore p r e s s u r e response for strains less

than 1.5 per c e n t . The d o t t e d l i n e p r e d i c t s an i n c r e a s i n g

pore p r e s s u r e whose r a t e of i n c r e a s e c o n t i n u a l l y decreases

with s t r a i n . T h i s suggests t h a t the pore p r e s s u r e transducer

i s r e g i s t e r i n g the c o r r e c t pore p r e s s u r e a f t e r about 1.5 per

cent a x i a l s t r a i n . T h i s i s e q u i v a l e n t to an e l a s p e d time i n

the t e s t of about 16 minutes. T h i s approach, when used f o r

a l l normally c o n s o l i d a t e d samples, gave v a l u e s o f about 10 to

30 minutes t o reach pore p r e s s u r e e q u a l i z a t i o n , which i s l e s s

than the t h e o r e t i c a l e q u a l i z a t i o n time. However, f o r over-

c o n s o l i d a t e d samples, a smooth curve through the i n i t i a l pore

p r e s s u r e i s not p o s s i b l e and, t h e r e f o r e , t h i s method cannot

be used to estimate e q u a l i z a t i o n times. For example, i n

F i g u r e 9 the pore p r e s s u r e / s t r a i n curve i s p l o t t e d f o r T e s t

C-16 which was an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d sample. Upon l o a d i n g , the

pore p r e s s u r e rose and a f t e r the f i r s t r e a d i n g the pore p r e s -

sure was observed to drop. I t i s impossible to hypothesize

the t r u e pore p r e s s u r e behaviour between zero and two per

cent s t r a i n and, t h e r e f o r e , an estimate of the time u n t i l pore

pressure e q u a l i z a t i o n i s o b t a i n e d i s not p o s s i b l e . Thus, the

pore p r e s s u r e / s t r a i n curve can o n l y be suggested as a probable


- 56

9S

2 3 4 5 6

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 9 - PORE PRESSURE / STRAIN CURVE (TI= 6 )


- 57

check on the e q u a l i z a t i o n times f o r nonuniform pore p r e s s u r e s

in the normally c o n s o l i d a t e d t e s t s e r i e s . As a r e s u l t , pore

p r e s s u r e s measured a f t e r the f i r s t hour of creep are assumed

to be c o r r e c t and, i n f a c t , those measured a f t e r the f i r s t 20

minutes of creep are l i k e l y c l o s e t o the c o r r e c t v a l u e s .

Pore p r e s s u r e s measured d u r i n g the l a s t few minutes

of a creep r u p t u r e t e s t are a l s o q u e s t i o n a b l e , s i n c e at h i g h

s t r a i n r a t e s pore p r e s s u r e e q u a l i z a t i o n cannot take p l a c e .

Thus, f a i l u r e c r i t e r i a based, on e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s parameters

at r u p t u r e are d i f f i c u l t to c o n f i r m . In a d d i t i o n , as rupture

approaches, i t i s d i f f i c u l t to keep the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s con-

s t a n t due t o the changing c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l area. Furthermore,

the f a i l u r e s t r a i n i s d i f f i c u l t to estimate (see F i g u r e 7 ) .

The o n l y parameter which can be measured w i t h reasonable

accuracy at r u p t u r e i s the e l a p s e d time o f creep l o a d i n g .

Thus, i t i s necessary to look f o r a f a i l u r e c r i t e r i o n which

i s not dependent on parameters measured d u r i n g the final

p a r t of the t e s t . I t was t h e r e f o r e decided to look more

c l o s e l y a t the v a r i a t i o n of s t r a i n r a t e s d u r i n g the test.

F i g u r e 10 i s a p l o t of c a l c u l a t e d s t r a i n r a t e s

a g a i n s t e l a p s e d time on a l o g - l o g p l o t f o r T e s t G-6. There


- 58

10'

10"
•:

c c
*&

cr
z
<
cr

<
x
< NORMALLY C ONSOl-IDATED
TEST N . C - 6
0

10" 5

10 1
10 1
10 2
10' IO 4

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 10 - LOG STRAIN RATE VERSUS


LOG ELAPSED TIME (NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED)
, - 59

is a well-defined v a r i a t i o n of s t r a i n r a t e d u r i n g the com-

p l e t e t e s t , the v a r i a t i o n b e i n g a continuous f u n c t i o n and

having' a d e f i n i t e t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e w i t h no

p a r t i c u l a r i n t e r v a l of time over which i t could be said

the s t r a i n r a t e was constant. I t should be remembered

that t h i s i s the same t e s t shown i n F i g u r e 7. I t had been

suggested t h a t the s t r a i n / t i m e curve i n F i g u r e 7 could be

d i v i d e d i n t o primary, secondary and t e r t i a r y creep. How-

ever, on the s t r a i n r a t e p l o t (Figure 10), i t appears that

there was no secondary creep i n Test C - 6 . Therefore, it

i s suggested t h a t secondary creep does not e x i s t f o r Haney

c l a y and i s only r e c o g n i z e d on the s t r a i n / t i m e curve be-

cause of the s c a l e of the s t r a i n o r d i n a t e . Once the strain

r a t e becomes f a i r l y s m a l l (i.e., approaching a h o r i z o n t a l

l i n e on a s t r a i n / t i m e c u r v e ) , a change of slope by a f a c t o r

of two becomes d i f f i c u l t to d i s t i n g u i s h . . As a r e s u l t , i f

secondary s t r a i n r a t e s were evaluated f o r Haney c l a y from

s t r a i n / t i m e curves, the secondary s t r a i n r a t e obtained

could be a f u n c t i o n of the d u r a t i o n of the t e s t . For example,

Figures 11 and 12 present the s t r a i n / t i m e curves f o r Test

C-5 which d i d not reach a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e .


- 60

FIGURE I I - S T R A I N / TIME CURVE


0 - 5 , 0 0 0 MINUTES

FIGURE 1 2 - S T R A I N / T I M E CURVE
0-50,000 MINUTES
- 61

Figure 11 shows the r e s u l t s p l o t t e d f o r the f i r s t 5,000

minutes and, i f the t e s t were t o be stopped a t t h i s point,

the "secondary s t r a i n r a t e " o b t a i n e d would be .00017 per

cent per minute. However, on F i g u r e 12 the complete t e s t i s

plotted (total duration greater than 40,000 minutes) and the

"secondary s t r a i n r a t e " o b t a i n e d i s .00002 per cent per

minute. Of course, both o f these "secondary s t r a i n r a t e s "

are meaningless.

Campanella (1965) showed t h a t , f o r s t r e s s e s below

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h o f c o n s o l i d a t e d illite, the s t r a i n

r a t e was c o n t i n u a l l y d e c r e a s i n g f o r the d u r a t i o n o f the

test. i t i s observed t h a t Campanella's r e s u l t s o f s t r a i n

rate versus elapsed time are n e a r l y p a r a l l e l s t r a i g h t l i n e s

on a l o g - l o g p l o t . f o r v a r i o u s subfailure stress levels

(Figure 13), as p r e d i c t e d by the phenomenological equation o f

Singh and M i t c h e l l (1968). Once the s t r a i n r a t e i s observed

to i n c r e a s e , a l l t e s t r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e t h a t the s t r a i n rate

w i l l continue t o i n c r e a s e and e v e n t u a l l y the sample i s bound

to fail.

Therefore, the e x i s t e n c e of a t r a n s i e n t minimum

s t r a i n r a t e can be used as an i n d i c a t i o n of a time dependent

impending f a i l u r e . This i s s i m i l a r t o the f a i l u r e criterion


- 62

.00005

.00002

.00001
2 5 10 20 50 100 200 500 1000

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

( A F T E R CAMPANELLA, 1965)

FIGURE 13 - LOG STRAIN RATE VERSUS


LOG TIME FOR SATURATED ILLITE
suggested by Casagrande and Wilson (1951) and Coates, Burn

and McRostie (1963). However, they d i d not use a s t r a i n

r a t e p l o t t o o b t a i n the p o i n t o f i n f l e c t i o n i n the s t r a i n /

time curves. To a v o i d confusion throughout the remainder

of t h i s t h e s i s , whenever f a i l u r e of creep t e s t s i s d i s -

cussed, i t w i l l be c l e a r l y s t a t e d whether f a i l u r e i s being

defined at the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e or a t r u p t u r e .

Table I I l i s t s the values of measured parameters

at the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e . At t h i s p o i n t i n a

t e s t , s i n c e the s t r a i n r a t e i s low, the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s and

pore water pressure can be measured more a c c u r a t e l y than a t

rupture. The r e s u l t s i n Table I I i n d i c a t e t h a t the value

of the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e decreased w i t h decreased

deviator s t r e s s , w h i l e the elapsed time t o the t r a n s i e n t

minimum s t r a i n r a t e i n c r e a s e d . The p r i n c i p a l e f f e c t i v e

stress ratio, the s t r a i n and Skempton "A" are a l l shown t o

i n c r e a s e a t the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e f o r d e c r e a s -

ing deviator s t r e s s . Included i n Table II are the r e s u l t s

of the incremental l o a d i n g t e s t f o r the purpose of compari-

son. I t i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o compare the maximum d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s and s t r a i n r a t e f o r the incremental loading test

w i t h the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s and t r a n s i e n t minimum strain


TABLE I I

Normally C o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y
Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

Transient
Deviator Minimum S t r a i n At T r a n s i e n t Minimum S t r a i n Rate Time t o T r a n s i e n t
Stress Rate (Per cent Strain Minimum S t r a i n Rate
(psi) per Minute) oY/ov (Per cent) Skempton "A" (Minutes)

51.3 .165 2.45 2.4 .72 6


48.3 .040 2.61 2.7 .85 29
46.3 .0150 2.53 2.9 .92 80
44.9 .0037 2.75 4.2 1.05 510
43.7 .00190 2.82 5.2 1.15 1, 200
43.4 .00038 2.88 5.4 1.17 5,600

42.8* .000018 2.95 5.0 1.19 40,800

*Did not reach a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e - r -


parameters evaluated j u s t before stopping t e s t .

Incremental Loading T e s t *

Maximum
Deviator S t r a i n Rate Total
Stress (per cent Strain E l a p s e d Time
(psi) per Minute) (Per cent) Skempton "A" (Minutes)

52.0 .40 2.80 4.3 1.12 327

* F a i l u r e based on maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s .
r a t e s obtained from the creep t e s t s . The maximum d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s obtained i n the i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t i s almost the

same as the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s which caused f a i l u r e very q u i c k l y

i n a creep t e s t , and the magnitude o f the s t r a i n r a t e s are

also similar.

F i g u r e 14 shows the development of 0 ] ' / (J ' 3 with

s t r a i n f o r Test C-6. T h i s development i s e n t i r e l y due t o

the i n c r e a s i n g pore water p r e s s u r e as the sample s t r a i n e d .

The t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e occured a t 5.2 per cent

s t r a i n and the s t r a i n r a t e c o n t i n u a l l y i n c r e a s e d from this

stage i n the t e s t u n t i l r u p t u r e . F i g u r e 15 compares the

maximum recorded OV/CTj f o r each d e v i a t o r s t r e s s at which

a creep t e s t was performed. Although pore water p r e s s u r e s

are known t o be q u e s t i o n a b l e near r u p t u r e i n creep tests,

it i s i n t e r e s t i n g t o note t h a t the maximum p r i n c i p a l effec-

t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o a t or near creep rupture.was approximately

3 .20.

As mentioned p r e v i o u s l y , i f e f f e c t i v e stress

s t r e n g t h parameters a r e used f o r d e s i g n , i t i s necessary t o

estimate the a n t i c i p a t e d pore p r e s s u r e s . F i g u r e 16 shows

the pore p r e s s u r e / s t r a i n curves f o r three creep t e s t s w i t h

w i d e l y d i f f e r e n t times t o reach f i v e per cent s t r a i n . The


- 66

—r—

NORIAALLY :ONSOL DATED

2.50
40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51
DEVIATOR STRESS ( P S I )

FIGURE 15-MAXIMUM (7,7(7^ OBTAINED FROM CREEP TESTS


- 67

70

DID NOT REAC H ATRANSIENT


MINIMUM STRA IN RATE •

60

(/'/
CO
0.
UJ
CC
z>
f
CO
CO
UJ

tr
a, NORMALLY CON SOLIDATED
CREEP TESTS
tr
UJ

o
a.

DEAVIATOR TIME
STRESS TO
PSI 5 % STRAIN
X 51.3 17 MINUTES

e 46.3 3 HOURS

A 42.8 2 9 DAYS

2 3

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 16 - EFFECT OF DEVIATOR STRESS


ON PORE PRESSURE
- 68

longest duration test developed the largest pore pressure

at five per cent strain, y e t had not reached a transient

minimum strain rate after 29 d a y s when the test was stopped.

The other two t e s t s , although generating slightly smaller

pore pressures at five per cent strain, resulted i n creep

rupture failures. Based upon these results, i t c a n be seen

that prediction o f pore pressures and r e s u l t i n g creep

failure i s a complex problem.

4.2 - Undrained C r e e p R u p t u r e T e s t s on
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Samples (Over-
c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 2)

All samples i n this series were normally consoli-

dated f o r 24 h o u r s and t h e n rebounded t o an e f f e c t i v e stress

of 3 7 . 5 p s i f o r 36 h o u r s . The average water content before

shearing was 33.5 p e r c e n t with a standard d e v i a t i o n of the

average equal t o ^0.2 p e r c e n t . The average pore pressure

rise during t h e 8-hour undrained stage before shearing was

only -0.3 p s i , a l t h o u g h some tests actually registered a

small decrease i n pore pressure during this period. Iti s

reasonable t o expect that the pore pressure change during

the undrained stage would be less f o r the overconsolidated

samples, as compared with the normally consolidated samples,


- 69

since the t o t a l consolidation time was longer and the e f f e c -

tive stress had been reduced from 75 p s i . This resulted i n

less tendency f o r secondary compression.

The incremental loading t e s t which was performed

yielded a maximum deviator stress o f 46.5 p s i a t an axial

strain of about 4.8 per cent. Using this value as a refer-

ence compressive strength, creep rupture tests were run at

deviator stresses o f 41.9, 39.9 and 38.9 p s i .

Figure 17 s h o w s the strain/time and pore pressure/

time curves f o r Test C-15. Due to overconsolidation, the

pore pressure d i d not increase a s much as f o r normally con-

solidated samples; however, t h e shape of the strain/time

curve i s similar t o those already presented. Figure 18

shows the s i m i l a r i t y of s t r a i n rate/time behaviour to that

obtained f o r normally consolidated samples.

Table I I I presents the values of parameters at

the transient minimum strain rate f o r two creep rupture

tests, as w e l l as t h e ^ r e s u l t s of the incremental loading

test. The b e h a v i o u r of this test series i s similar t o the

test series on n o r m a l l y consolidated Haney clay and will

not be commented on further at this point.


o
5

500 1000 1500 2000 2500

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 1 7 - UNDRAINED CREEP TEST


OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO = 2
- 7 1

FIGURE 18 - LOG STRAIN RATE VERSUS


LOG ELAPSED TIME (n=2)
TABLE I I I

Overconsolidated Haney C l a y ( 1 7 = 2 )
Undrained Creep Rupture Tescs

Transient
Deviator Minimum S t r a i n At T r a n s i e n t Minimum S t r a i n Rate Time t o T r a n s i e n t
Stress Rate (Per cent Strain Minimum S t r a i n Rate
(psi) per Minute) oiVo-3 1
(Per cent) Skempton "A" (Minutes)

41.9 .018 2.79 2.9 .37 61


39.9 .0019 2.87 3.8 .42 790

38.9* .000083 3.11 5.8 50 12,950

*Did not reach a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e —


parameters evaluated j u s t before stopping test.

Incremental Loading Test*

Maximum
Deviator S t r a i n Rate Total
Stress (Per cent Strain E l a p s e d Time
(P s i
? per Minute) <V/CT 3 (Per cent) Skempton "A" (Minutes)

46.5 .29 3.12 4.4 .28 290

* F a i l u r e based on maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s . 1
4.3 - Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s on
O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Samples (Over-
c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 6)

All samples i n t h i s s e r i e s were n o r m a l l y consoli-

dated f o r 24 hours and then rebounded t o an effective

s t r e s s of 12.5 p s i f o r 36 h o u r s . The average water content

b e f o r e s h e a r i n g was 34.5 per cent w i t h a standard d e v i a t i o n

o f the average equal t o -0.2 per c e n t . During the 8-hour

undrained stage b e f o r e s h e a r i n g , the pore p r e s s u r e dropped

by an average of 0.4 p s i .

An i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t y i e l d e d a maximum de-

v i a t o r s t r e s s of 33.6 p s i at an a x i a l s t r a i n o f about 6.0

per c e n t . Using t h i s v a l u e as a r e f e r e n c e compressive


i

s t r e n g t h , creep t e s t s were run at d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s of 31.4,

30.2, 29.1 and 28.7 p s i .

F i g u r e 19 shows the s t r a i n / t i m e and pore p r e s s u r e /

time curves f o r T e s t C-20. Note again the s i m i l a r i t y i n

shape of the s t r a i n / t i m e curve w i t h the p r e v i o u s t e s t s . The

pore p r e s s u r e d u r i n g t h i s t e s t does not change a p p r e c i a b l y

and thus both t o t a l and e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s are n e a r l y con-

stant. Table IV p r e s e n t s the r e s u l t s of t h i s t e s t s e r i e s i n

the same form as b e f o r e . These r e s u l t s are s i m i l a r t o those


15

500 1000 1500 2000 2500


ELAPSED T I M E (MINUTES)

HANEY CLAY
a ' = 12.5 p s i
3c

TEST No. C - 2C>

500 1000 1500 2000 2500


E L A P S E D TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 1 9 - UNDRAINED CREEP TEST


OVERCONSOLIDATION RATI0=6
TABLE IV

Overconsolidated Haney C l a y (17=6)


Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

Transient
Deviator Minimum S t r a i n At T r a n s i e n t Minimum S t r a i n Rate Time t o T r a n s i e n t
Stress Rate (Per cent Strain Minimum S t r a i n Rate
per Minute) (Per cent) Skempton "A' (Minutes)

31.4 .018 3.42 4.8 .00 85


30.2 .0026 3.42 6.9 -.01 834
29.1 .0011 3.45 8.6 .04 3,060

28.7* ,000008 3.38 3.8 ,03 11,800

*Did not reach a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e —


parameters evaluated j u s t before stopping test

Incremental Loading Test*

Maximum
Deviator S t r a i n Rate Total
Stress (Per cent Strain E l a p s e d Time
(P )s i
per Minute) <V/ai (Per cent) Skempton "A 1
(Minutes)

33.6 .56 3.45 6.0 -.02 217

• F a i l u r e based on maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s .
- 76

already presented. The most s i g n i f i c a n t parameter measured

d u r i n g t h i s t e s t s e r i e s was the pore water p r e s s u r e . Since

the pore p r e s s u r e remained n e a r l y constant d u r i n g the creep

t e s t s , both the t o t a l and e f f e c t i v e p r i n c i p a l s t r e s s ratios

were unchanged. However, the s t r a i n / t i m e response was simi-

l a r t o the r e s u l t s of t e s t s on samples w i t h d i f f e r e n t con-

s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s which had v a r i a t i o n s i n pore pressure

d u r i n g creep t e s t s . F i g u r e 20 shows the s t r a i n r a t e / t i m e

curve f o r Test C-20, which i s a g a i n very s i m i l a r t o the r e -

s u l t s presented from other tests.

4.4 - Drained Creep Rupture T e s t s on


O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Samples (Over-
c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 25)

A l l samples i n t h i s s e r i e s were normally consoli-

dated f o r 24 hours and then rebounded t o an e f f e c t i v e stress

of 3.0 p s i f o r 44 hours. The average water content b e f o r e

s h e a r i n g was 36.8 per cent w i t h a standard d e v i a t i o n of the

average e q u a l to -0.25 per c e n t .

For comparative purposes, a l l s t r a i n s quoted for

d r a i n e d t e s t s are shear s t r a i n s "jy ) . Therefore, the

v o l u m e t r i c component i s e l i m i n a t e d from s t r a i n r a t e calcula-

tions .
77

FIGURE 2 0 - LOG STRAIN RATE VERSUS


LOG ELAPSED TIME ( r i = 6 )
- 78

A drained incremental loading test yielded a maxi-

mum deviator s t r e s s o f 15.9 p s i a t a shear strain o f 4.5 per

cent. Using this value as a r e f e r e n c e compressive strength,

drained creep rupture t e s t s were run at deviator stresses of

15.1, 14.5, 13.9 a n d 13.1 p s i .

Figure 21 shows the shear strain/time and water

content/time curves f o r Test C-22. The s h a p e of the strain/

time curve i s similar t o those already reported and, as

anticipated, the sample was observed to swell during shear.

Table V presents a summary of the r e s u l t s obtained from this

test series. The c o m p r e s s i v e strength f o r these drained

tests i n noted t o decrease for increasing times to failure.

Initially, i t was thought that the decrease in

strength during a drained test for heavily overconsolidated

samples could be explained as the r e s u l t of an increase in

void ratio during shear and, t h e r e f o r e , by the resulting

reduction i n number or strength of interparticle bonds.

However, a comparison o f the shape of the s t r a i n rate/time

curve f o r Test C-22, shown i n Figure 22, indicates that the

strain rate response i s similar t o that previously repor.ted

for undrained creep tests. To investigate this further,

two u n d r a i n e d creep t e s t s were performed with the same


15

DRAINED CREEP

10
Z
<
CC
w
or
<
LU
X _(J = | 4 . 5 psi
CO

100 200 300 400 500

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 21 - DRAINED CREEP TEST


OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO = 2 5
TABLE V

O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney C l a y ( 7 7 = 2 5 )
Drained Creep Rupture T e s t s

Trans ient At T r a n s i e n t
Deviator Minimum S t r a i n Minimum S t r a i n Rate Time t o T r a n s i e n t
Stress Rate (per cent / v
Shear S t r a i n Minimum S t r a i n Rate
(P s i
) per Minute) (Per cent) (Per cent) (Minutes)

15.1 .011 38 4.4 95


14.5 .0039 .50 3.5 205
13.9 .0036 66 4.0 272

13.1* .000012 ,66 3.3 17,300

*Did not reach a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e —


parameters evaluated j u s t before s t o p p i n g t e s t

Drained Incremental Loading T e s t *

Maximum
Deviator S t r a i n Rate Total
Stress (Per cent /
A V
Shear S t r a i n E l a p s e d Time
(psi) per Minute) (Per cent) (Per cent) (Minutes)

15.9 .12 .43 4.5 680

* F a i l u r e based on maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s
03
o
- 81

FIGURE 22 - LOG SHEAR STRAIN RATE VERSUS


LOG ELAPSED TIME (n =25)
- 82

consolidation h i s t o r y as f o r t h i s t e s t s e r i e s . The

r e s u l t s of these undrained t e s t s are p r e s e n t e d i n the

next section.

4.5 - Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s on


O v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d Samples (Over-
c o n s o l i d a t i o n R a t i o = 25)

A l l samples i n t h i s s e r i e s were n o r m a l l y consoli-

dated f o r 24 hours and then rebounded t o an e f f e c t i v e stress

of 3.0 p s i f o r 36 hours. The t h r e e undrained t e s t s run i n

t h i s s e r i e s were trimmed from a b l o c k of Haney c l a y which was

o b t a i n e d from a s l i g h t l y d i f f e r e n t l o c a t i o n than a l l the other

tests reported i n t h i s t h e s i s . As a r e s u l t , the average

water content b e f o r e s h e a r i n g was 1.7 per cent h i g h e r than

f o r the samples used i n the d r a i n e d t e s t s e r i e s w i t h the same

consolidation history. During the 8-hour undrained stage

b e f o r e s h e a r i n g , the pore p r e s s u r e dropped by an average of

0.6 p s i .

An incremental loading t e s t y i e l d e d a maximum de-

v i a t o r s t r e s s of 17.6 p s i at an a x i a l s t r a i n o f about 7.2

per c e n t . Using t h i s v a l u e as a r e f e r e n c e compressive

s t r e n g t h , creep t e s t s were run a t d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s of 16.9

and 16.0 p s i .
- 83

F i g u r e 23 shows the s t r a i n / t i m e and pore p r e s s u r e /

time curves f o r T e s t C-35. Note that d u r i n g t h i s t e s t , the

pore p r e s s u r e i s c o n t i n u a l l y d e c r e a s i n g and, therefore, the

p r i n c i p a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o i s a l s o d e c r e a s i n g through-

out the t e s t . F i g u r e 24 shows the s t r a i n r a t e / t i m e curve

which i s a g a i n s i m i l a r t o the r e s u l t s a l r e a d y presented f o r

other t e s t s e r i e s . Table VI p r e s e n t s a summary of the t e s t s

performed i n this series.

Based upon the r e s u l t s of these d r a i n e d and undrained

tests, i t i s obvious t h a t the a d d i t i o n a l s w e l l i n g d u r i n g the

d r a i n e d t e s t only decreases the compressive strength, i n addi-

t i o n t o the e f f e c t of time d u r i n g the undrained test.

Since the water contents a f t e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n f o r the

d r a i n e d and undrained t e s t s e r i e s v a r i e d by 1.7 per cent, i t

i s not p o s s i b l e t o r e a l i s t i c a l l y compare the compressive

s t r e n g t h s obtained from the two test series. I t would be

expected that the undrained compressive s t r e n g t h would be

larger. However, the h i g h e r water content a t the s t a r t of

the undrained t e s t s would l i k e l y reduce the compressive

s t r e n g t h and, therefore, the f a c t t h a t the measured undrained

compressive s t r e n g t h s are o n l y s l i g h t l y l a r g e r than the

d r a i n e d compressive s t r e n g t h s i s understandable.
20

in

; K
-M—
* -**
HANEY CLAY
CT c= 3.0 psi
3

TEST No. C - 3 5

0
0 50 100 150 200

ELAPSED T I M E (MINUTES)

FIGURE 23 - UNDRAINED CREEP TEST


OVERCONSOLIDATION RATIO = 2 5
FIGURE 2 4 - LOG STRAIN RATE VERSUS
LOG ELAPSED TIME (t) = 2 5 )
TABLE VI

Overconsolidated Haney C l a y (17=25)


Undrained Creep Rupture T e s t s

Transient
Deviator Minimum S t r a i n At T r a n s i e n t Minimum Strain Rate Time t o T r a n s i e n t
Stress Rate (Per cent Strain Minimum S t r a i n Rate
(,P )
s i per Minute) 7CT' (Per cent) Skempton "A" (Minutes)

16.9 ,15 4.26 6.6 - .11 16


16.0 ,046 3.95 6.9 -.13 55

Incremental Loading T e s t *

Maximum
Deviator S t r a i n Rate Total
Stress (Per cent Strain E l a p s e d Time
(psi) per Minute) (Per cent) Skempton "A' (Minutes)

17.6 .15 3.96 7.2 -.11 596

• F a i l u r e based on maximum d e v i a t o r stress.

1
oo
- 87

4.6 - Summary

The r e s u l t s of creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y a t s t r e s s

l e v e l s l a r g e enough t o e v e n t u a l l y cause creep r u p t u r e show

t h a t , f o r v a r i o u s c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s and drainage con-

ditions, the s t r a i n r a t e d u r i n g the i n i t i a l stage of the

t e s t c o n t i n u a l l y decreases u n t i l r e a c h i n g a t r a n s i e n t m i n i -

mum value and then i n c r e a s e s u n t i l r u p t u r e . As a r e s u l t ,

i t has been proposed that the onset of creep r u p t u r e be

d e f i n e d as o c c u r r i n g at the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n rate.

A l s o , as a r e s u l t of the e x i s t e n c e of a t r a n s i e n t minimum

s t r a i n r a t e , i t i s noted that Haney c l a y does not e x h i b i t

"secondary creep."

The s t r a i n r a t e / t i m e behaviour f o r a l l creep

r u p t u r e t e s t s was noted t o be s i m i l a r , whether drainage was

allowed, or whether pore p r e s s u r e s , and thus e f f e c t i v e

s t r e s s e s , were observed t o be i n c r e a s i n g , d e c r e a s i n g or not

changing d u r i n g the t e s t .

For normally c o n s o l i d a t e d Haney c l a y , creep r u p -

t u r e was noted t o occur a t approximately the same p r i n c i p a l

e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o , w h i l e the onset o f creep r u p t u r e a t

the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e could not be p r e d i c t e d on

the b a s i s o f e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s parameters.
- 88

CHAPTER 5

CREEP RUPTURE CRITERIA

5.1 - Line of Minimum Strain Rates

In Chapter 4, results were presented showing

the response of Haney clay with various consolidation

histories to creep loadings. Except for the strain

rate curves, a l l test results were plotted against the

elapsed time on a linear scale. This was done to enable

the reader to appreciate the changes taking place during

a test based on a natural time scale. Unfortunately,

elapsed times for creep tests vary over a wide range and

thus the most convenient plot for presentation of* a l l

data i s on a base of logarithm of elapsed time. Figure

25 shows the s t r a i n / l o g a r i t h m time curves for a l l tests

on normally consolidated samples. It is impossible to

predict from the s t r a i n / l o g a r i t h m time curve whether or

not a sample i s going to rupture, since upward curva-

ture does not necessarily indicate increasing strain

rates. The t r a n s i e n t minimum strain rates are marked

on the curves with a short vertical line and i t is

obvious that no indication of the t r a n s i e n t minimum strain

rate c o n d i t i o n i s a v a i l a b l e from this logarithm plot.


- 89

FIGURE 2 5 - STRAIN / TIME RESULTS


UNDRAINED CREEP OF HANEY CLAY
- 90

Figure 2 6 shows the log-log plot of strain rate against

elapsed time. I t i s evident that t h e lower the deviator

stress the longer the t o t a l rupture life. Based on these

experimental results, i t i s seen that a l l transient mini-

mum strain rates nearly l i eon a straight line i n this

log-log plot. The e q u a t i o n of this line f o r normally con-

solidated specimens i s :

log t = - . 1 4 2 -
i o 1.15 l o g J m ± .116 (8)

where: t = elapsed time until the transient


minimum strain rate ( i n minutes)

£ =
m t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n rate
(in per cent per minute)

The 95 p e r c e n t confidence limits o f -0.116 a r e

equal t o twice the standard error of estimate (Arkin and

Colton 1966) and the c o e f f i c i e n t of correlation for this

,, . , standard error of estimate. .


equation (defined as 1 - ) is
standard d e v i a t i o n

0.942.

All strain rate/time curves start below the line

of transient minimum strain rates and, i f they proceed to

it, failure will e v e n t u a l l y take place. Otherwise, the

sample will not f a i l i n creep rupture. Unfortunately, this


- 91

FIGURE 2 6 - STRAIN RATE / TIME RESULTS


UNDRAINED CREEP TESTS
NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY
- 92

c r i t e r i o n does not permit e v a l u a t i o n of the magnitude of

s t r a i n s which occur and these c o u l d be e x c e s s i v e l y l a r g e .

In F i g u r e 26, Test C-5, with a d e v i a t o r s t r e s s -of 42.8 p s i ,

appears t o be proceeding along a l i n e p a r a l l e l t o the l i n e

of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s i n the l a t t e r stages of

the t e s t . I t i s u n l i k e l y , then, t o ever reach the l i n e of

t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s and, t h e r e f o r e , i t i s r e a s o n -

able t o assume t h a t t h i s sample w i l l not f a i l i n creep a t

this stress l e v e l . T h i s would i n d i c a t e the e x i s t e n c e of

an upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h f o r c l a y s and i t s e x i s t e n c e is in

agreement w i t h the hypotheses of Murayama and S h i b a t a (1961)

and V i a l o v and S k i b i t s k y (1957), which s t a t e t h a t an upper

yield s t r e n g t h e x i s t s f o r s o i l s , below which creep rupture

f a i l u r e w i l l not occur. T h i s upper y i e l d compressive

s t r e n g t h o f 42.8 p s i i s 17.7 per cent below the r e f e r e n c e

compressive s t r e n g t h of 52.0 p s i obtained from the i n c r e -

mental l o a d i n g test.

For s t r e s s e s below the upper y i e l d strength, defor-

mation r a t e s w i l l e v e n t u a l l y become n e g l i g i b l e a f t e r l a r g e

elapsed times. T h i s i s based on the assumption t h a t a l l t e s t

c o n d i t i o n s remain the same; namely, t o t a l s t r e s s e s , tempera-

t u r e and drainage c o n d i t i o n s . Under f i e l d conditions, small


changes i n temperature or s t r e s s e s i n the s o i l w i l l cause

v a r i a t i o n s i n the s t r a i n r a t e and, t h e r e f o r e , a s l o p e known

to be c r e e p i n g very slowly, when loaded with a d d i t i o n a l

weight from heavy r a i n f a l l or snowmelt, w i l l c e r t a i n l y

speed up and may a c t u a l l y f a i l .

Figure 27 shows the l o g - l o g p l o t of s t r a i n r a t e

versus elapsed time f o r a l l creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y w i t h

an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o o f two. Placed on t h i s curve i s

the l i n e o f t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s obtained from

the t e s t s on n o r m a l l y c o n s o l i d a t e d clay (Equation 8). It

is noted t h a t the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n rates

fits these data, i n a d d i t i o n t o that o f the normally con-

s o l i d a t e d t e s t s ; y e t the c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y , water con-

t e n t and creep loadings are d i f f e r e n t . T e s t C-27 w i t h a

deviator s t r e s s o f 38.9 p s i does not appear t o approach

the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s and, t h e r e f o r e ,

it i s predicted that i t would never f a i l . This deviator

s t r e s s i s 16.3 per cent below the r e f e r e n c e strength of

46.5 p s i obtained from the i n c r e m e n t a l loading t e s t .

Figure 28 shows the l o g - l o g p l o t o f s t r a i n rate

a g a i n s t elapsed time f o r a l l creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y w i t h

an overconsolidation r a t i o of s i x . The l i n e of t r a n s i e n t
- 94

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 2 7 - STRAIN RATE / TIME RESULTS


UNDRAINED CREEP TESTS
OVERCONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY (rj=2)
- 95

5
10" 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
I I
10° 10' 10 2 10' 10 4

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 2 8 - STRAIN RATE / TIME RESULTS


UNDRAINED CREEP TESTS
OVERCONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY(TI = 6 )
- 96

minimum s t r a i n r a t e s from normally consolidated tests i s

p l a c e d on t h i s p l o t and, as f o r t e s t s w i t h an o v e r c o n s o l i -

d a t i o n r a t i o of two, the l i n e f i t s the t e s t r e s u l t s with

reasonable agreement. The t e s t , with a d e v i a t o r s t r e s s of

28.7 p s i , i s p r e d i c t e d t o never f a i l and i s a t a s t r e s s

l e v e l 14.6 per cent below the r e f e r e n c e s t r e n g t h o f 33.6

p s i obtained from the i n c r e m e n t a l loading test.

F i g u r e 29 shows the same r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r the

d r a i n e d and undrained creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y w i t h an

o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o of 25. Although there i s a g r e a t e r

s c a t t e r o f data from the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum strain

r a t e s obtained from the normally c o n s o l i d a t e d t e s t s , the

relationship s t i l l appears t o adequately represent the time

a t which the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e occurs f o r these

heavily overconsolidated samples. Some o f the s c a t t e r o f

r e s u l t s about the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s

may be caused by i n a c c u r a t e e v a l u a t i o n of s t r a i n r a t e s ,

s i n c e they are c a l c u l a t e d on the b a s i s of uniform strain

throughout the complete l e n g t h o f the sample. This

assumption i s reasonable f o r normally c o n s o l i d a t e d and

l i g h t l y overconsolidated c l a y s , but subject t o e r r o r i n

h e a v i l y overconsolidated soils (Roscoe, S c h o f i e l d and


- 97

ELAPSED TIME (MINUTES)

FIGURE 2 9 - STRAIN RATE / TIME RESULTS


UNDRAINED AND DRAINED CREEP TESTS
OVERCONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY(ri = 2 5 )
- 98

Wroth 1958). For the d r a i n e d t e s t s , a decrease of 17.6 per

cent i s noted between the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s which does not

cause f a i l u r e (13.1 p s i ) and the r e f e r e n c e strength of 15.9

psi.

The agreement between the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t m i n i -

mum s t r a i n r a t e s from normally c o n s o l i d a t e d t e s t s and those

t e s t s w i t h d i f f e r e n t c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s i n d i c a t e s that

the same b a s i c process governs the creep behaviour for a l l

tests. It i s , therefore, not s u r p r i s i n g t h a t the per cent

reduction i n s t r e n g t h between the r e f e r e n c e strength and

the upper y i e l d strength i s n e a r l y the same (14.6 to 17.7

per cent) f o r a l l c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s .

I t i s proposed t h a t f o r Haney c l a y a l i n e of

t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s e x i s t s which i s independent

of c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y , s t r e s s l e v e l and drainage con-

ditions, assuming t h a t the t o t a l s t r e s s e s remain constant.

Figure 30 shows the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s obtained

by a l e a s t square f i t of a l l the test results. The equation

of t h i s l i n e i s :

log t
l o = .037 - 1.08 log £
| 0 m ± .322 (9)
- 99

10" 5

10° 10 1
IO 2
103 10*

TIME OF TRANSIENT MINIMUM STRAIN RATES

FIGURE 3 0 - LINE OF TRANSIENT MINIMUM STRAIN RATES


HANEY CLAY
- 100

The slope of t h i s l i n e i s n e a r l y the same as i n

Equation 8 (the l i n e o f t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s ob-

tained from only normally c o n s o l i d a t e d t e s t s ) , b u t the

o r d i n a t e when 6 ro = 1.0 i s s l i g h t l y g r e a t e r . The 95 per cent

confidence l i m i t s of Equation 9 are l a r g e r than f o r Equation

8, and the c o e f f i c i e n t o f c o r r e l a t i o n f o r Equation 9is

0.819. Therefore, the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n

r a t e s , which b e s t f i t s a l l t e s t data, does not c o r r e l a t e

as w e l l as the l i n e o f t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s ob-

t a i n e d f o r the normally consolidated t e s t s e r i e s only.

However, the accuracy of the f i t i s s t i l l considered ade-

quate, such t h a t the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s

(Equation 9) can be s a i d t o be independent o f c o n s o l i d a t i o n

h i s t o r y , s t r e s s l e v e l and drainage conditions.

5.2 - T o t a l Rupture L i f e Criterion

S a i t o and Uezawa (1961) proposed t h a t a l i n e a r

r e l a t i o n s h i p e x i s t s between the l o g a r i t h m of the "secondary

s t r a i n r a t e " and the l o g a r i t h m of the t o t a l r u p t u r e life,

independent o f the type o f s o i l . As a l r e a d y d i s c u s s e d i n

Chapter 4, a "secondary s t r a i n r a t e " does not e x i s t f o r

Haney c l a y . However, f o r t e s t s which e v e n t u a l l y r u p t u r e ,


- 101

the "secondary s t r a i n r a t e " e v a l u a t e d from a strain/time

curve i s nearly equal t o the numerical value of the t r a n s i e n t

minimum s t r a i n r a t e . Therefore, t o compare the r e s u l t s of

creep r u p t u r e t e s t s on Haney c l a y w i t h the t h e o r y proposed

by S a i t o and Uezawa, i t i s o n l y necessary t o p l o t the

t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e a g a i n s t the t o t a l r u p t u r e life.

F i g u r e 31 shows the r u p t u r e c r i t e r i o n of S a i t o and

Uezawa, together w i t h t h e i r 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s of

-0.59. The e q u a t i o n f o r the r e l a t i o n s h i p i s :

log t = .498-916 log §. ± .59


|0 r 10 (10)

where: i = t o t a l rupture l i f e
r ( i n minutes)
o
{ £, = "secondary s t r a i n r a t e " ( i n per
cent per minute)

Data shown f a l l i n g i n s i d e these c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s

include a l l creep r u p t u r e t e s t s on Haney c l a y , one undrained

creep r u p t u r e t e s t on remoulded i l l i t e a t 110 degrees F

(Campanella 1965) and the r e s u l t s of S h e r i f (1965) f o r un-

d r a i n e d t e s t s on an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d S e a t t l e clay.

The e q u a t i o n of the b e s t s t r a i g h t l i n e obtained

from the t e s t r e s u l t s f o r Haney c l a y i s :

loQ,t, = .75l-.92 log !„. ±.272


0 10 (11)
- 102

TOTAL RUPTURE LIFE (MINUTES)

FIGURE 31 - TOTAL RUPTURE LIFE OF


LABORATORY CREEP TESTS
- 103

The s l o p e of t h i s l i n e i s the same as t h a t o b t a i n e d

by S a i t o and Uezawa, but the o r d i n a t e when Z=


m 1.0 is slightly

greater. The 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s f o r Haney c l a y

are s m a l l e r than those o b t a i n e d by S a i t o and Uezawa. There-

f o r e , i t i s suggested t h a t each s o i l may have i t s own relation-

s h i p between the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e and total rup-

t u r e l i f e which i s s i m i l a r t o t h a t of other s o i l s . However,

t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p may not n e c e s s a r i l y be unique for a l l soils

as suggested by S a i t o and Uezawa.

Small v a r i a t i o n s i n samples, which are inevitable,

cause a c o n s i d e r a b l e d i f f e r e n c e i n r u p t u r e t i m e s . Therefore,
i

the 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s f o r the r u p t u r e criterion

o b t a i n e d from l a b o r a t o r y s t u d i e s are f a i r l y l a r g e . For

example, the S a i t o and Uezawa e q u a t i o n (Equation 10) predicts

t h a t the 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s of a p r e d i c t e d f a i l u r e

i n 10 days range between 2-1/2 t o 39 days. Although t h i s i s

a l a r g e range i n n a t u r a l time, i t at l e a s t allows evaluation

of whether f a i l u r e may take p l a c e i n minutes, a few hours or

many y e a r s . L i k e w i s e , the 95 per cent c o n f i d e n c e l i m i t s of

E q u a t i o n 11 f o r a p r e d i c t e d f a i l u r e i n 10 days range between

5-1/2 and 19 days. Only w i t h f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h on additional


- 104

s o i l s ' w i l l i t be p o s s i b l e to determine whether each indivi-

d u a l s o i l should be c o n s i d e r e d t o have i t s own r u p t u r e equa-

t i o n or whether the s c a t t e r caused by sample v a r i a t i o n

c r e a t e s such a wide e r r o r band t h a t the i n c l u s i o n of a l l

s o i l s i n t o a s i n g l e r u p t u r e equation, as proposed by S a i t o

and Uezawa, i s a c c e p t a b l e .

5.3 - P r e d i c t i o n of Creep Rupture


F a i l u r e s i n the L a b o r a t o r y

In order t o p r e d i c t the time of a creep rupture

failure, i t i s necessary t o determine some r e l a t i o n s h i p be-

tween the s t r a i n r a t e measured d u r i n g a t e s t and the time

remaining u n t i l creep r u p t u r e o c c u r r e d . T h e r e f o r e , i t was

d e c i d e d t o i n v e s t i g a t e the l a b o r a t o r y s t r a i n r a t e s as a f u n c -

t i o n of the time t o r u p t u r e . At t h i s p o i n t , i t i s necessary

to emphasize the d i f f e r e n c e between the time to r u p t u r e and

the t o t a l r u p t u r e l i f e . The t o t a l r u p t u r e l i f e i s the

e l a p s e d time from i n i t i a l loading u n t i l rupture, while the

time t o r u p t u r e i s the remaining time t o r u p t u r e from any

stage of a t e s t . T h e r e f o r e , any r u p t u r e c r i t e r i a based upon

the time to r u p t u r e would not r e q u i r e the knowledge of the

i n i t i a l time of l o a d i n g .
- 105

F i g u r e 32 shows a p l o t o f the l o g a r i t h m of time t o

r u p t u r e a g a i n s t the l o g a r i t h m o f the s t r a i n r a t e f o r Test

C-6. Note t h a t with i n c r e a s i n g elapsed time, the t e s t pro-

gresses from r i g h t t o l e f t on t h i s p l o t . There are two o c c a -

s i o n s when the s t r a i n r a t e has a value o f 0.10 per cent per

m i n u t e — o n c e d u r i n g the d e c r e a s i n g s t r a i n r a t e stage, 2,570

minutes b e f o r e r u p t u r e , and once d u r i n g the i n c r e a s i n g s t r a i n

r a t e stage, 150 minutes b e f o r e r u p t u r e . Therefore, for this

test, i f the s t r a i n r a t e i s known t o be 0.01 per cent per

minute, rupture i s a minimum of 150 minutes away.

F i g u r e 33 shows r e s u l t s from a l l creep rupture

t e s t s on Haney c l a y when the s t r a i n r a t e i s i n c r e a s i n g .

Therefore, each p o i n t shown on F i g u r e 33 i s a r e a d i n g taken

a f t e r the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e . I t can be seen

that f o r Haney c l a y there i s a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between the

l o g a r i t h m of the s t r a i n r a t e and the l o g a r i t h m of the time

to rupture, which i s independent o f s t r e s s l e v e l , consoli-

d a t i o n h i s t o r y and drainage conditions. Therefore, knowing

the e x i s t i n g a c c e l e r a t i n g s t r a i n r a t e i n a t e s t , a minimum

time t o r u p t u r e can be p r e d i c t e d . I f the s t r a i n r a t e i s

decreasing, then no i n f o r m a t i o n r e g a r d i n g time t o r u p t u r e

i s obtained and, i n f a c t , the sample may not f a i l . As


- 106

|
NORMAL.LY SONSOLIDA1 ED
TEST Mo. C - 6
L 1
^- S TART Or TEST

L-RUPTUR E N

<
x
<

10° IO 1
IO 2
10 3
IO 4
10 s

TIME TO RUPTURE ( MINUTES)

FIGURE 3 2 - TIME TO RUPTURE /STRAIN RATE CURVE

10° IO 1
IO 8
IO 3
IO 4
IO 6

TIME TO RUPTURE (MINUTES)

FIGURE 33- TIME TO RUPTURE /STRAIN RATE


RELATIONSHIP
- 107

pointed out i n Chapter 4, u n t i l a t r a n s i e n t minimum strain

r a t e has been reached i t i s impossible t o p r e d i c t whether a

f a i l u r e w i l l take place.

The e q u a t i o n of the r e l a t i o n s h i p f o r Haney c l a y

between time t o r u p t u r e and a c c e l e r a t i n g s t r a i n r a t e i s :

log, ttr « . 2 3 - l o g
0 l o 8 (12)

which can be reduced t o :

ttr (13) ,
E

where: t t r = time t o r u p t u r e from time t


( i n minutes)

£ = a c c e l e r a t i n g s t r a i n rate at
time t ( i n per cent per minute)

If t h i s s t r a i n rate/time to rupture r e l a t i o n s h i p

f o r Haney c l a y i s a p p l i c a b l e t o other s o i l s , then E q u a t i o n

1 3 can be used t o p r e d i c t s l o p e failures. This must be

confirmed by e x t e n s i v e t e s t i n g conducted on v a r i o u s soils

throughout the w o r l d . Of course, the a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h i s

r e l a t i o n s h i p would r e q u i r e t h a t the s o i l have a t r a n s i e n t

minimum s t r a i n r a t e when subjected t o a creep loading

above the upper y i e l d strength.


- 108

In Chapter 2, r e f e r e n c e was made t o a method of

f o r e c a s t i n g slope f a i l u r e s by Saito (1965). T h i s method,

although b e i n g s u b j e c t t o c r i t i c i s m , has successfully pre-

d i c t e d slope failures. Data from these slope f a i l u r e s have

been p l o t t e d on F i g u r e 33 and i t can be seen t h a t the time

to rupture c r i t e r i o n f o r Haney c l a y would have adequately

predicted impending f a i l u r e . Saito s 1


p r e d i c t i o n of the

time of f a i l u r e was based on c a l c u l a t i o n s from Equation 10,

the use of which t h i s author b e l i e v e s t o be fundamentally

incorrect. The p r e d i c t i o n of the time t o r u p t u r e must be

based upon parameters which are independent of the initial

time of l o a d i n g . However, i t should be noted t h a t Equation

10 i s numerically s i m i l a r t o E q u a t i o n 12 and, therefore,

t h i s s i m i l a r i t y may explain Saito's success.

5.4 - P r e d i c t i o n of Creep Rupture


F a i l u r e s i n the F i e l d

In S e c t i o n 5.3, a r e l a t i o n s h i p between the time t o

r u p t u r e and the a c c e l e r a t i n g s t r a i n r a t e has been presented

which permits the p r e d i c t i o n of the time of creep r u p t u r e

for laboratory creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y . Limited field

r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e that t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p would p r e d i c t fail-

ures observed and reported by Saito (1965). This


- 109

r e l a t i o n s h i p should, t h e r e f o r e , be i n v e s t i g a t e d , both i n

the l a b o r a t o r y and the f i e l d , t o determine i f this simple

r e l a t i o n s h i p i s independent of s o i l type, c o n s o l i d a t i o n

h i s t o r y , drainage c o n d i t i o n s and s t r e s s l e v e l . The f o l l o w -

ing d i s c u s s i o n w i l l assume t h a t such an all-encompassing

relationship exists. The f o l l o w i n g procedure could then

be used t o p r e d i c t the time when a s l o p e f a i l u r e might

occur.

By m o n i t o r i n g the deformations o f a slope and con-

v e r t i n g these r e s u l t s i n t o s t r a i n r a t e s , i t would be p o s s i b l e

to c o n t i n u a l l y p r e d i c t a minimum l e n g t h o f time u n t i l a r u p -

t u r e might be expected. I f the s t r a i n r a t e s i n c r e a s e d due t o

heavy r a i n f a l l , f o r example, the p r e d i c t e d time t o r u p t u r e

would decrease and, i f t h i s time t o r u p t u r e dropped below a

c r i t i c a l value, say 24 hours, then the a f f e c t e d area could

be c l o s e d o f f t o p r o t e c t the p u b l i c . I f the s t r a i n r a t e s

l a t e r decreased, without a f a i l u r e o c c u r r i n g , then the p r e -

d i c t e d time t o r u p t u r e would a g a i n i n c r e a s e and the a f f e c t e d

area could once a g a i n be opened t o the p u b l i c .

Subject t o f u r t h e r r e s e a r c h t o c o n f i r m the

h y p o t h e s i s presented i n this section, a general p r a c t i c a l

approach t o the p r e d i c t i o n of s l o p e f a i l u r e s has been


proposed. As a l r e a d y d i s c u s s e d , d e t e c t a b l e movements are

known t o take p l a c e long b e f o r e some f a i l u r e s occur and,

i f monitored, these movements can be used t o p r e d i c t the

time o f the f a i l u r e .
- I l l

CHAPTER 6

STRESS/STRAIN/STRAIN RATE THEORY

6.1 - Introduction

In Chapter 5, the e x i s t e n c e of an upper y i e l d

s t r e n g t h f o r Haney c l a y was shown. T h i s upper y i e l d strength

was evaluated by performing a s e r i e s of creep r u p t u r e tests,

each t e s t a t a decreased deviator stress, u n t i l a f a i l u r e

d i d not take p l a c e . I t was assumed t h a t f a i l u r e would not

occur i f the l o g a r i t h m of s t r a i n r a t e / l o g a r i t h m of time

curve d i d not appear t o approach the l i n e of t r a n s i e n t

minimum s t r a i n r a t e s . Since performance of a s e r i e s of

creep t e s t s i s a very t e d i o u s and time-consuming procedure,

it i s of i n t e r e s t t o determine whether e q u i v a l e n t i n f o r m a t i o n

can be obtained by some e a s i e r means. For example, c o u l d

constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s be used to evaluate the upper

yield strength? These t e s t s are e a s i e r to perform, since

the time a t which readings should be taken can be predeter-

mined and c o r r e c t i o n s to a x i a l loads are not r e q u i r e d to

m a i n t a i n constant s t r e s s c o n d i t i o n s . I f c o r r e l a t i o n of the

r e s u l t s obtained from creep t e s t s and constant s t r a i n r a t e

t e s t s i s t o be attempted, a h y p o t h e s i s must be presented to

p r e d i c t the i n t e r r e l a t i o n between these tests.


- 112

6.2 - Deviator S t r e s s / S t r a i n /
S t r a i n Rate R e l a t i o n s h i p

In an attempt t o reduce the l a r g e number of v a r i -

a b l e s which a f f e c t the s t r e s s / s t r a i n behaviour of s o i l s , and

thereby permit a p o s s i b l e c o r r e l a t i o n of r e s u l t s from differ-

ent types of t r i a x i a l t e s t s , the f o l l o w i n g l i m i t a t i o n s w i l l

apply to a l l discussions i n t h i s s e c t i o n :

(1) - Samples must not be h e a v i l y o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d . This

w i l l ensure t h a t s t r a i n measurements are r e p r e s e n t a t i v e

of the a c t u a l s t r a i n s throughout the sample (Roscoe,

S c h o f i e l d and Wroth 1958).

(2) - A l l t e s t s must be undrained. This w i l l eliminate

e f f e c t s due t o volume change f o r which no theory i s

proposed i n t h i s t h e s i s .

(3) - The d u r a t i o n of the t e s t must be s u f f i c i e n t t o ensure

pore water pressure e q u a l i z a t i o n throughout the

sample.

(4) - A l l t e s t s must be performed i n such a manner t h a t the

a x i a l compressive s t r a i n i s c o n t i n u a l l y i n c r e a s i n g

and, t h e r e f o r e , the e f f e c t of s t r a i n r e v e r s a l s w i l l

not be discussed.
- 113

(5) - The i n i t i a l c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y must be the same

for a l l samples.

(6) - As p r e v i o u s l y s t a t e d , a l l t e s t s must be performed

at constant temperature.

These r e s t r i c t i o n s , therefore, exclude from dis-

c u s s i o n a l l t e s t s on h e a v i l y o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d c l a y , but

i n c l u d e the r e s u l t s of a l l normally c o n s o l i d a t e d and over-

consolidated (17 =2 and T? =6) undrained creep rupture, incre-

mental l o a d i n g and constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s .

W i t h i n the l i m i t a t i o n s a l r e a d y presented, i t i s

proposed that the d e v i a t o r stress, during t r i a x i a l t e s t s on

samples w i t h the same i n i t i a l c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y , can be

expressed as a f u n c t i o n of the c u r r e n t s t r a i n and c u r r e n t

strain rate.

To i n v e s t i g a t e the v a l i d i t y of t h i s hypothesis,

the r e s u l t s of creep rupture, i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g and con-

s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s on Haney c l a y are shown i n F i g u r e s

34, 35 and 36. P l o t t e d on these f i g u r e s are the s t r a i n

r a t e / s t r a i n paths f o r the normally c o n s o l i d a t e d , overcon-

solidated ( 1 7 =2) and o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d ( 7 7 =6) triaxial

tests, respectively. On the paths o f the constant strain


- 114

•2 .4 .6 I 2 4 6 10 20

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 3 4 - STRAIN RATE / STRAIN CURVES


NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY
- 115

2 .4 .6 I 2 4 6 10

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 35 - STRAIN RATE / STRAIN CURVES


OVERCONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY (n = 2)
- 116

FIGURE 3 6 - STRAIN RATE / STRAIN CURVES


OVERCONSOLIDATED HANEY CLAY (r| = 6)
- 117

r a t e and i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t e s t s , the values of d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s m o b i l i z e d at t h a t s t r a i n and s t r a i n r a t e are shown,

while f o r the creep t e s t s the constant d e v i a t o r s t r e s s i s

shown on the creep curve. For the h y p o t h e s i s t o be v a l i d ,

the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s at any s t r a i n and s t r a i n r a t e must be

unique and independent of the type of t e s t . Investigation

of these r e s u l t s i n d i c a t e s r e a s o n a b l y good agreement between

the three types o f t e s t s . T h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p has, a t present,

o n l y been observed t o apply t o Haney c l a y . I t i s hoped

that s i m i l a r r e s e a r c h w i l l be undertaken by others to d e t e r -

mine whether t h i s a p p l i e s t o most u n d i s t u r b e d clays.

No attempt has been made i n t h i s i n v e s t i g a t i o n to

e v a l u a t e a mathematical r e l a t i o n s h i p between s t r e s s , strain

and s t r a i n r a t e , b u t r a t h e r a d i s c u s s i o n of the i n t e r r e l a t i o n

of these parameters i s presented t o enable e v a l u a t i o n of the

behaviour of one type of t e s t based upon the r e s u l t s of

another type. For example, F i g u r e s 37, 38 and 39 show the

a c t u a l s t r e s s / s t r a i n curves obtained f o r i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g

and constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s on Haney c l a y . P l o t t e d on

these f i g u r e s are p o i n t s p r e d i c t e d from the creep rupture

t e s t s f o r both the i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g and c o n s t a n t strain

rate tests. I t should be noted t h a t , f o r a constant strain


- 118

INCREMENTAL LOADING TEST

PREDICTED RESULTS

CONSTANT STRAIN RATE TEST


(.008%/MIN.)

co
Q.

CO
CO
UJ
rr
r-
CO
RESULTS PREDICTED FROM CREEP TESTS
cr
o FOR THE =
r- 1. INCREMENTAL LOADING TEST - X
<
2. CONSTANT STRAIN RATE TEST -Q~
>
Q

4 6 10

AXIAL STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 3 7 - PREDICTED AND ACTUAL STRESS / STRAIN


CURVES FOR NORMALLY CONSOLIDATED
HANEY CLAY
FIGURE 3 8 - PREDICTED AND ACTUAL STRESS/STRAIN
CURVES FOR OVERCONSOLIDATED
HANEY CLAY (n = 2 )
- 120

FIGURE 3 9 - PREDICTED AND ACTUAL STRESS /


STRAIN CURVES FOR OVERCONSOLIDATED
HANEY CLAY (TI = 6 )
- 121

rate test, the s t r e s s / s t r a i n curve can be p r e d i c t e d d i r e c t l y

from a s e r i e s of creep t e s t s , s i n c e the s t r a i n rate/strain

path i s known; whereas, f o r i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g tests,

n e i t h e r the s t r e s s , s t r a i n nor s t r a i n r a t e remains constant

and, therefore, prediction of the s t r e s s / s t r a i n curve can

only be attemtped once the s t r a i n r a t e / s t r a i n path i s known.

Consider now, the r e s u l t s of a constant strain

rate t e s t performed a t a s t r a i n r a t e e q u a l t o the t r a n s i e n t

minimum s t r a i n r a t e o f a creep r u p t u r e t e s t . As a r e s u l t

of the r e l a t i o n s h i p between d e v i a t o r s t r e s s , s t r a i n and

s t r a i n rate, the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s of the constant

s t r a i n rate t e s t should be e q u a l t o the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s .

applied i n the creep t e s t (see F i g u r e s 34, 35 and 36) and

should occur a t the same s t r a i n as the t r a n s i e n t minimum

s t r a i n rate of the creep r u p t u r e t e s t . This i s a most im-

portant prediction, s i n c e i t e x p l a i n s the i n t e r r e l a t i o n

between the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e s obtained from

creep t e s t s and the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s obtained from

constant s t r a i n r a t e tests.

The s t r e s s / s t r a i n / s t r a i n rate relationship also

allows p r e d i c t i o n of creep behaviour on the b a s i s of the

shape of s t r e s s / s t r a i n curves from c o n s t a n t s t r a i n rate


- 122

tests. For i n s t a n c e , i f the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s continues t o

increase or l e v e l s o f f without d e c r e a s i n g with i n c r e a s i n g

strain, then a creep t e s t would not reach a t r a n s i e n t mini-

mum s t r a i n r a t e , s i n c e t h i s would be incompatible with the

r e s u l t s of the constant s t r a i n rate t e s t . Therefore, f o r

s o i l s which conform t o t h i s s t r e s s / s t r a i n / s t r a i n r a t e r e -

l a t i o n s h i p and c o n t i n u a l l y s t r a i n harden d u r i n g constant

s t r a i n rate tests, i t i s predicted t h a t a creep rupture

f a i l u r e w i l l not occur. However, any s o i l f o r which a

maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s i s reached, followed by a decrease

i n the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s with f u r t h e r s t r a i n would be expected

to f a i l i n a creep t e s t i f s u b j e c t e d t o the maximum d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s of the constant strain rate test.

As reported i n Chapter 4, the maximum d e v i a t o r

s t r e s s of incremental l o a d i n g t e s t s was about 15 per cent

above the upper y i e l d strength o f Haney c l a y . The maximum

deviator s t r e s s o f the incremental loading t e s t i s mobilized

at about the same s t r a i n as the minimum s t r a i n r a t e i n creep

t e s t s and, t h e r e f o r e , the d i f f e r e n c e i n s t r e n g t h can be r e -

l a t e d t o the d i f f e r e n c e i n s t r a i n r a t e s a t f a i l u r e . At

failure, the s t r a i n r a t e f o r the incremental loading test

i s very l a r g e , w h i l e the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e f o r


- 123

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h i s t h e o r e t i c a l l y zero. The d i f -

ference i n s t r a i n r a t e a t f a i l u r e a l s o e x p l a i n s the reason

why the maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s from the i n c r e m e n t a l load-

i n g t e s t i s l a r g e r than that obtained from the constant

s t r a i n rate tests reported i n this thesis.

6.3 - E v a l u a t i o n of the Upper


Y i e l d Strength

In Chapter 5, the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h was d e t e r -

mined by performing a s e r i e s of creep rupture tests at

decreasing s t r e s s l e v e l s u n t i l a f a i l u r e d i d not occur.


i

T h i s procedure may r e q u i r e many t e s t s b e f o r e the upper

y i e l d j s t r e n g t h i s determined and, t h e r e f o r e , a method i s

proposed which enables the p r e d i c t i o n of the upper y i e l d

s t r e n g t h based upon a minimum o f two creep rupture or two

constant s t r a i n rate tests. The proposed r e l a t i o n used t o

determine the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h i s as f o l l o w s :

C7 = U.Y. + K 6 ''n
0 (14)

where: <T = maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s


D

(constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t )
or d e v i a t o r s t r e s s (creep t e s t )

U.Y. = upper y i e l d strength


- 124

' K ,n = constants

£ = s t r a i n r a t e (constant s t r a i n
r a t e t e s t ) or t r a n s i e n t minimum
s t r a i n r a t e (creep t e s t )

For Haney c l a y , i t has been found t h a t taking

n = 3 gives a r e a s o n a b l y good s t r a i g h t l i n e r e l a t i o n between

0" and
0 the cube r o o t of £ . Figure 40 shows the r e s u l t s of

both creep r u p t u r e and s t r a i n r a t e c o n t r o l l e d t e s t s used to

p r e d i c t the upper y i e l d strength of Haney c l a y f o r four con-

solidation histories. Twelve of the constant s t r a i n r a t e

t e s t s shown i n F i g u r e 40 were run on 1.4-inch by 2.8-inch

samples. The maximum d e v i a t o r s t r e s s i n these t e s t s has been

reduced by 1.2 p s i , the suggested c o r r e c t i o n to a l l o w for the

d i f f e r e n c e i n s i d e d r a i n and membrane e f f e c t s between 1.4-

i n c h by 2.8-inch samples and 2.5-inch by 5.0-inch samples

(Bishop and Henkel 1962, Duncan and Seed 1965). Table VII

lists the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h s obtained from the creep

t e s t s and the constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s . I t can be seen

that both the creep r u p t u r e and constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s

p r e d i c t e s s e n t i a l l y the same upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h for similar

drainage and consolidation h i s t o r i e s .

Sherif (1965) suggested t h a t a flow r u l e e x i s t e d

f o r c l a y s , which p r e d i c t e d t h a t the d e v i a t o r stress in a


- 1 2 5

60

0 .2 .4 .6 .8
CUBE ROOT OF TRANSIENT MINIMUM STRAIN RATE (%/MIN.)

60
1 1 1
— UPPER YIELD STRENGTH _D
I .. J CONSOUOtfE
to 50
v

0.
CO 43-1 (
2
CO
39 0 ,
or 40

6
o 30
28.2
X - 2.5"X 5 0 " SA VtPLES
<
0 - I . 4 " X 2 . 8 " SA MPLES
> 20
o 13.5 Ti • 2 5 (DRAIN E 0 )
X , i
i f
1
S
< 10
FROM CJONSTAN T STRA N RATE TESTS

0 .2 .4 .6 .8

CUBE ROOT OF STRAIN RATE (%/MIN.)

FIGURE 4 0 - DETERMINATION OF UPPER YIELD


STRENGTH USING PROPOSED METHOD
- 126

TABLE V I I

Upper Y i e l d S t r e n g t h
f o r Haney C l a y

Upper Y i e l d S t r e n g t h
Obtained Obtained from
from Creep Constant S t r a i n
Consolidation Rupture T e s t s Rate T e s t s
History Condition (P ) s i
(P )
s i

Normally
consolidated Undrained 42.5 43.4

V= 2 Undrained 38.5 38.8

T) = 6 Undrained 28.6 28.7

i?= 25 Drained 13.5 13.1


- 127

creep t e s t was equal t o the upper y i e l d strength plus a con-

stant times the secondary creep r a t e . This i s equivalent to

E q u a t i o n 14 with n = 1 and p r e d i c t s a s t r a i g h t l i n e r e l a t i o n

between d e v i a t o r s t r e s s and s t r a i n r a t e . Sherif postulated

t h a t t h i s r e l a t i o n holds f o r s t r e s s l e v e l s s l i g h t l y above

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h , but i s i n v a l i d a t h i g h e r stress

levels. Figure 41 shows S h e r i f ' s r e s u l t s f o r a S e a t t l e clay.

The three creep t e s t s a t the lower s t r e s s l e v e l s are shown t o

lie on a s t r a i g h t l i n e . The p r o j e c t i o n of t h i s l i n e t o zero

s t r a i n rate gives the upper y i e l d strength. The creep t e s t

at the h i g h e s t s t r e s s l e v e l i s shown t o be c o n s i d e r a b l y o f f

the straight line. In F i g u r e 42, a l l four t e s t p o i n t s are

shown t o approximately d e f i n e a s t r a i g h t l i n e when p l o t t e d

against the cube r o o t o f the s t r a i n r a t e . T h e r e f o r e , the

upper y i e l d strength f o r S e a t t l e c l a y can be p r e d i c t e d equally

w e l l by Equation 14 w i t h n = 3. Future r e s e a r c h on other

s o i l s w i l l , hopefully, p r o v i d e proof o f the a p p l i c a b i l i t y of

Equation 14 with n = 3 f o r the d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f upper y i e l d

strengths.

Murayama and S h i b a t a (1961) proposed t h a t a l i n e a r

r e l a t i o n e x i s t s between —•—— and 0* up t o the upper y i e l d


d log t c J

strength. The s t r a i n / t i m e equation f o r t h e i r r h e o l o g i c a l


- 128
190

/ •x— — I
180 J
/ .• '
/ ^ —
'70
CO
w 160
CO
CO
LU 150

140
tr
o
< 130
> \ /
LU
° 120

no

100
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
SECONDARY CREEP R A T E (INCHES / MIN. X I 0 " )
s

(AFTER SHERIF, 1965)

FIGURE 41 - STRESS VERSUS SECONDARY CREEP RATE

CO

CO
CO
LU
tr
i-
co

tr
o
I—
<
>
LU
Q

0 .02 .04 .06 .08 .10 .12


CUBE ROOT OF SECONDARY CREEP RATE (INCHES/MIN.)
(AFTER SHERIF, 1965)

FIGURE 4 2 - STRESS VERSUS CUBE ROOT OF SECONDARY


CREEP RATE
- 129

model i s presented again f o r convenience:

e =£ + + -V^ (6)

Murayama and Shibata (1964) d i f f e r e n t i a t e d

Equation 6 by time i n s t e a d of the l o g a r i t h m of time and

thereby p r e d i c t e d a l i n e a r r e l a t i o n between d £ / d t and 0" f o r

constant elapsed times and f o r s t r e s s e s below the upper y i e l d

strength. T h i s method, proposed by Murayama and Shibata, for

o b t a i n i n g the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h cannot be checked f o r

Haney c l a y , s i n c e n e a r l y a l l creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y were

run at s t r e s s l e v e l s above the upper y i e l d strength. How-

ever, r e s u l t s of Campanella (1965) f o r the undrained creep

of i l l i t e are at s t r e s s l e v e l s below the upper y i e l d strength

and, as a r e s u l t , t h i s d a t a can be used t o check the Murayama

and S h i b a t a theory. F i g u r e 43 shows the s t r a i n r a t e a t con-

s t a n t elapsed times a g a i n s t the s t r e s s l e v e l . The strain

r a t e / s t r e s s r e s u l t s are not l i n e a r , but curved, and no sharp

d i s c o n t i n u i t y i n the curve e x i s t s t o permit e v a l u a t i o n of

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h . However, the maximum s t r e s s level

i s above the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h , s i n c e a creep rupture

f a i l u r e occurred f o r the t e s t w i t h 0~ = 1.630 kg/cm ^.

Murayama and S h i b a t a (1964) a l s o proposed t h a t the

upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h c o u l d be obtained from an incremental


FIGURE 4 3 - RESULTS OF UNDRAINED CREEP
OF ILLITE
stress test. F i g u r e 44 shows the r e s u l t s of four incremental

t e s t s on Haney c l a y which i n d i c a t e that no sharp d i s c o n t i n -

u i t y e x i s t s i n the l o g 0"/log £ curve t o permit e v a l u a t i o n of

the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h as proposed by Murayama and S h i b a t a .

I t must, t h e r e f o r e , be assumed t h a t the Murayama and Shibata

methods f o r d e t e r m i n a t i o n of the upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h are not

a p p l i c a b l e f o r Haney c l a y or remoulded illite.


- 132

.2 .6 I 10
STRAIN (%)

FIGURE 4 4 - INCREMENTAL LOADING TESTS


ON HANEY CLAY
\

- 133

CHAPTER 7

CONCLUSIONS

The following i s a l i s t of c o n c l u s i o n s and hypo-

theses d e r i v e d from the a n a l y s i s of data from creep, constant

s t r a i n r a t e and i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g t r i a x i a l tests:

(1) - A secondary or constant creep s t r a i n r a t e does not

exist f o r Haney c l a y s u b j e c t e d t o s t r e s s e s above the

upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h . The creep s t r a i n r a t e d u r i n g

creep r u p t u r e t e s t s i n i t i a l l y decreased w i t h elapsed

time, reached a t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e and

then i n c r e a s e d u n t i l r u p t u r e . Once a t r a n s i e n t m i n i -

mum s t r a i n r a t e had been reached, the sample inevitably

ruptured. T h e r e f o r e , the onset o f f a i l u r e can be con-

s i d e r e d t o occur a t the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e .

(2) - The pore water p r e s s u r e i n normally c o n s o l i d a t e d

samples of Haney c l a y c o n t i n u a l l y i n c r e a s e d d u r i n g a l l

creep t e s t s . Thus, the e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s e s were de-

c r e a s i n g and the e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s r a t i o increasing

throughout the complete t e s t . For a creep t e s t w i t h

an o v e r c o n s o l i d a t i o n r a t i o of s i x , the pore pressure


- 134

barely changed d u r i n g a creep r u p t u r e t e s t . Since

the shape of the strain/time curve i s s i m i l a r f o r both

normally c o n s o l i d a t e d and o v e r c o n s o l i d a t e d undrained

t e s t s , the onset of creep r u p t u r e cannot be explained

i n terms of e f f e c t i v e stresses.

(3) - Based upon the r e s u l t s of creep t e s t s on Haney c l a y , a

r e l a t i o n s h i p e x i s t s between the t r a n s i e n t minimum

s t r a i n r a t e and the elapsed time of l o a d i n g , which i s

independent of c o n s o l i d a t i o n history, stress level and

drainage c o n d i t i o n s . C o n f i r m a t i o n of t h i s f a c t i s not

available for other s o i l s and should be investigated.

(4) - R e s u l t s of creep r u p t u r e t e s t s on Haney c l a y confirmed

a r e l a t i o n s h i p between the t o t a l creep r u p t u r e l i f e and

the t r a n s i e n t minimum s t r a i n r a t e . This is similar to

the h y p o t h e s i s of S a i t o and Uezawa.

(5) - For Haney c l a y , a r e l a t i o n s h i p e x i s t s between the

deviator s t r e s s , s t r a i n and s t r a i n rate for tests in

which the strain is continually increasing, the tem-

p e r a t u r e remains constant, adequate time i s a v a i l a b l e

f o r pore p r e s s u r e e q u a l i z a t i o n w i t h i n the sample, and

the consolidation h i s t o r y i s the same. This


- 135

r e l a t i o n s h i p enables c o r r e l a t i o n o f s t r e s s / s t r a i n

data between creep r u p t u r e and constant s t r a i n rate

tests. At p r e s e n t , t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p i s r e s t r i c t e d

to undrained c o n d i t i o n s and t o s o i l t h a t i s not

heavily overconsolidated. It i s anticipated that

t h i s r e l a t i o n s h i p w i l l hold t r u e f o r other saturated

cohesive soils.

Results of creep rupture t e s t s on Haney c l a y show t h a t

the s t r a i n rate i s inversely proportional t o the time

to r u p t u r e d u r i n g the f i n a l stage o f a t e s t i n which

the s t r a i n r a t e i s i n c r e a s i n g . This r e l a t i o n s h i p i s

independent of s t r e s s l e v e l , c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r y and

drainage c o n d i t i o n s . This r e l a t i o n s h i p c o u l d be a p p l i e d

to f i e l d measurements t o p r e d i c t the minimum time u n t i l

an a n t i c i p a t e d failure.

A method i s proposed by which the upper y i e l d strength

of a cohesive s o i l can be e v a l u a t e d by e i t h e r a s e r i e s

of creep r u p t u r e or constant s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s . The

upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h , evaluated by t h i s method, r e s u l t e d

i n the same upper y i e l d s t r e n g t h b e i n g p r e d i c t e d by

creep r u p t u r e and c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s f o r each

of four c o n s o l i d a t i o n h i s t o r i e s .
- 136

BIBLIOGRAPHY

A r k i n , H., and R. R. C o l t o n , 1966, " S t a t i s t i c a l Methods,"


Barnes & Noble, Inc., 226 pp.

Armstrong, J . E., 1957, " S u r f i c i a l Geology of New Westminster


Map-area, B r i t i s h Columbia," G e o l o g i c a l Survey of
Canada, Paper 57-5, 25 pp.

Bishop, A. W., 1966, "The S t r e n g t h of S o i l s as E n g i n e e r i n g


M a t e r i a l s , " S i x t h Rankine L e c t u r e , Geotechnique,
V o l 16, No. 2, June, 1966.

Bishop, A. W., and D. J . Henkel, 1962, "The Measurement of


S o i l P r o p e r t i e s i n the T r i a x i a l T e s t , " Edward
A r n o l d L t d . , 200 pp.

Bjerrum, L., N. Simons and I . T o r b l a a , 1958, "The E f f e c t of


Time on the Shear S t r e n g t h o f a S o f t Marine C l a y , "
Proceedings, B r u s s e l s Conf on E a r t h P r e s s u r e
Problems, V o l 1, pp 148-158.

B l i g h t , G. E., 1963, "The E f f e c t of Nonuniform Pore Pressures


on L a b o r a t o r y Measurements of the Shear S t r e n g t h of
S o i l s , " Proc NRC/ASTM Symposium on L a b o r a t o r y Shear
T e s t i n g , Ottawa, 1963, pp 173-184.

Byrne, P. M., 1966, " E f f e c t i v e S t r e s s Paths i n a S e n s i t i v e


C l a y , " M.A.Sc. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Campanella, R. G., 1965, " E f f e c t of Temperature and S t r e s s on


the Time-Deformation Behaviour of S a t u r a t e d C l a y , "
Ph.D. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y of C a l i f o r n i a , B e r k e l e y .

Casagrande, A., and S. D. W i l s o n , 1951, " E f f e c t of Rate of


Loading on the S t r e n g t h o f Clays and Shales a t
Constant Water Content," Geotechnique V o l 2, No. 3,
pp 251-263.

Chan, C. K. , and J . M. Duncan, 1967, "A. New Device f o r Mea-


s u r i n g Volume Changes and Pressures i n T r i a x i a l
T e s t s on S o i l s , " ASTM M a t e r i a l s Research and
Standards, V o l 7, No. 7, J u l y , 1967.
- 137

C h r i s t e n s e n , R. W., and T. H. Wu, 1964, " A n a l y s i s of C l a y


Deformation as a Rate Process," ASCE J o u r n a l of
S o i l MecVu, Nov. 1964, pp 125-157.

Clough, R. W., and R. J . Woodward, 1967, " A n a l y s i s of Embank-


ment S t r e s s e s and Deformations," ASCE J o u r n a l of
S o i l Mech., V o l 93, SM4, J u l y , 1967.

Coates, D. F., K. N. Burn and G. C. McRostie, 1963, "Strain-


Time-Strength R e l a t i o n s h i p s i n a Marine C l a y , "
E n g i n e e r i n g I n s t i t u t e of Canada, T r a n s a c t i o n s ,
EIC-63 - Geot. 11, Oct. 1963.

Crawford, C. B., 1959, "The I n f l u e n c e of Rate of S t r a i n on


E f f e c t i v e S t r e s s e s i n S e n s i t i v e C l a y , " ASTM S p e c i a l
T e c h n i c a l P u b l i c a t i o n No. 254, pp 36-61, 1959.

Duncan, J . M., and H. B. Seed, 1965, " E r r o r s i n S t r e n g t h T e s t s


and Recommended C o r r e c t i o n s , " Report No. TE-65-4,
Dept. C i v i l Eng., B e r k e l e y .

F i n n , W. D., 1967, " S t a t i c and Seismic Behaviour of an E a r t h


Dam," Canadian G e o t e c h n i c a l J o u r n a l , V o l IV, No. 1,
Feb. 1967.

G a r a f a l o , F., 1965, "Fundamentals of Creep and Creep Rupture


i n M e t a l s , " Macmillan S e r i e s i n M a t e r i a l s Science,
250' pp.

Glasstone, S., K. L a i d l e r and H. E y r i n g , 1941, "The Theory of


Rate Processes," McGraw H i l l , 1941.

Glynn, T. E., 1960, "Pore Pressure C h a r a c t e r i s t c i s of an


E x t r a s e n s i t i v e C l a y , " M.A.Sc. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y of
B r i t i s h Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

G o l d s t e i n , M., and G. Ter-Stepanian, 1 9 5 7 , "The Long-term


S t r e n g t h of Clays and Depth Creep of S l o p e s , " Proc
4th I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 2, pp 311-314.

Gupta, R. C., 1967, " E f f e c t of S t r a i n Rate and S t r u c t u r e on


the Development of Cohesion and F r i c t i o n i n a Sen-
s i t i v e C l a y , " M.A.Sc. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y of B r i t i s h
Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
- 138

H a e f e l i , R., 1953a, "Creep Problems i n S o i l s , Snow and I c e , "


Proc 3rd Int Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 3, pp 238-251.

H a e f e l i , R., 1953b, "The Behaviour Under the I n f l u e n c e of


S o i l Creep P r e s s u r e of the Concrete B r i d g e B u i l t
at K l o s t e r s by the Rhaetian Railway Company,
S w i t z e r l a n d , " Proc 3rd I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 2,
pp 175-179.

Henkel, D. J . , 1957, " I n v e s t i g a t i o n of Two Long-term F a i l u r e s


i n London C l a y Slopes at Wood Green and N o r t h o l t , "
Proc 4th Int Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 2, pp 315-320.

H e r r i n , M., and G. Jones, 1963, "Behaviour of Bituminous


M a t e r i a l s from the Viewpoint of A b s o l u t e Rate
Theory," presented at the meeting of the Amer Assn
of A s p h a l t Paving T e c h n o l o g i s t s , San F r a n c i s c o ,
C a l i f o r n i a , Feb. 1963.

Hirst, T. J . , 1966, " T r i a x i a l Compression Tests on an Undis-


turbed S e n s i t i v e C l a y , " M.A.Sc. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y
of B r i t i s h Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Lou, J . K., 1967, "The E f f e c t of Secondary Compression on


Shear S t r e n g t h , " M.A.Sc. T h e s i s , U n i v e r s i t y o f
B r i t i s h Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.

Lubahn, J . D., and R. P. F e l g a r , 1961, " P l a s t i c i t y and Creep


of M e t a l s , " John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York,
600 pp.

Mitchell, J . K., 1964, "Shearing R e s i s t a n c e of S o i l s as a


Rate P r o c e s s , " ASCE J o u r n a l of S o i l Mech., V o l 90,
No. SMI, Jan. 1964.

Mitchell, J . K., and R. G. Campanella, 1963, "Creep S t u d i e s


on Saturated C l a y s , " Symposium on L a b o r a t o r y Shear
T e s t i n g of S o i l s , ASTM S p e c i a l T e c h n i c a l P u b l i c a -
t i o n No. 361.
- 139

M i t c h e l l , J . K., R. G. Campanella and A. Singh, 1968, "Soil


Creep as a Rate Process," ASCE J o u r n a l of S o i l
Mech., V o l 94, No. SMI, Jan. 1968.

M i t c h e l l , J . K., H. B. Seed and J . Paduana, 1965, "The Creep


Deformation and S t r e n g t h C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of S o i l s
under the A c t i o n of S u s t a i n e d S t r e s s , " Report No.
TE 65-8, Dept of C i v i l Eng., Berkeley.

Monkman, F. C., and N. J . G r a n t , 1956, "An E m p i r i c a l R e l a -


t i o n s h i p between Rupture L i f e and Minimum Creep
Rate i n Creep-Rupture T e s t s , " P r o c ASTM, V o l 56,
pp 593-620.

Murayama, S., and T. S h i b a t a , 1956, "On the R h e o l o g i c a l


C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s of C l a y , " ( i n Japanese), Trans
Japan S o c i e t y of C i v i l E n g i n e e r i n g , 40, pp 1-31.

Murayama, S., and T. S h i b a t a , 1961, " R h e o l o g i c a l P r o p e r t i e s


of C l a y s , " Proc 5th Int Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 1,
pp 269-273.

Murayama, S., and T. S h i b a t a , 1964, "Flow and S t r e s s Relaxa-


t i o n of C l a y s , " Proceedings Rheology and S o i l
Mechanics Symposium, Grenoble, 1964, pp 99-129.

Pao, Y. H., and J . Marin, 1952, " P r e d i c t i o n of Creep Curves


from S t r e s s S t r a i n Data," Proceedings ASTM, 1952,
V o l 52, pp 51-57.

Penman, A.D.M., 1960, "A Study o f t h e Response Time o f V a r i -


ous Types o f P i e z o m e t e r , " Proc Conf Pore P r e s s u r e
and S u c t i o n i n S o i l s , B u t t e r w o r t h s , London, pp 53-58.

P e r l o f f , W. H., J r . , and J . 0. O s t e r b e r g , 1963, "The E f f e c t


o f S t r a i n Rate on t h e U n d r a i n e d Shear S t r e n g t h o f
C o h e s i v e S o i l s , " P r o c Second Panamerican Conf on
S o i l M e c h a n i c s and F o u n d a t i o n Eng., V o l 2, pp 103-
128.

Ree, T., and H. E y r i n g , 1958, "The R e l a x a t i o n Theory o f


T r a n s p o r t Phenomena," Rheology, V o l 2, C h a p t e r 3,
F. R. E i r i c h , E d i t o r , Academic P r e s s , New Y o r k , N.Y.
- 140

Roscoe, K. H., A. N. S c h o f i e l d and C. P. Wroth, 1958, "On the


Y i e l d i n g of S o i l s , " Geotechnique, V o l 8, No. 1,
March 1958, pp 22-53.

Rowe, P. W., and L. Barden, 1964, "Importance of Free Ends i n


T r i a x i a l T e s t i n g , " ASCE J o u r n a l of S o i l Mech., V o l
90, SMI, J a n . 1964.

S a i t o , M., and H. Uezawa, 1961, " F a i l u r e of S o i l due t o


Creep," P r o c 5 t h I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 1,
pp 315-318.

S a i t o , M., 1965, " F o r e c a s t i n g t h e Time of O c c u r r e n c e o f a


Slope F a i l u r e , " P r o c 6 t h I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 2,
pp 537-541.

S h e r i f , M. A., 1965, "Flow and F r a c t u r e of S e a t t l e C l a y s , "


Research S e r i e s No. 1, U n i v e r s i t y of Washington,
S o i l E n g i n e e r i n g , J a n . 1965.

S i n g h , A., and J . K. M i t c h e l l , 1968, " G e n e r a l S t r e s s - S t r a i n -


Time F u n c t i o n f o r S o i l s , " ASCE J o u r n a l of S o i l
M e c h a n i c s , V o l 94, No. SMI, J a n . 1968.

S u k l j e , L., 1961, "A L a n d s l i d e due t o Long-term Creep," P r o c


5th I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 2, pp 727-735.

T a y l o r , D. W., 1948, "Fundamentals of S o i l M e c h a n i c s , " John


W i l e y and Sons I n c . , 700 pp.

V i a l o v , S. S., and A. M. S k i b i t s k y , 1957, " R h e o l o g i c a l P r o -


c e s s e s i n F r o z e n S o i l s and Dense C l a y s , " P r o c 4 t h
I n t Conf S o i l Mech., V o l 1, pp 120-124.

Zener and Holloman, 1946, "Problems i n N o n e l a s t i c D e f o r m a t i o n


of M e t a l s , " J o u r n a l A p p l i e d P h y s i c s , V o l 17, No. 2,
Feb. 1946, p 69.
- 141

APPENDIX A

TEST EQUIPMENT AND TESTING PROCEDURES

A l - S t r e s s - g o r v t r o i l e d Apparatus

The frame used f o r i n c r e m e n t a l l o a d i n g and creep

t e s t s was d e s c r i b e d by Glynn (1960); however, a l l pore p r e s -

sure and volume change measuring apparatus used by Glynn was

removed and r e p l a c e d w i t h newer components and the frame was

mounted on rubber pads t o minimize t r a n s m i s s i o n o f b u i l d i n g

v i b r a t i o n s t o the sample. A l l t e s t s performed w i t h this

apparatus used 2.5-inch by 5.0-inch t r i a x i a l samples. An 0-

r i n g s e a l was i n s t a l l e d i n the machined b u s h i n g f o r the l o a d -

i n g ram t o reduce leakage d u r i n g long t e s t s . T h i s stopped

all leakage from t h e c e l l , b u t i n c r e a s e d the p i s t o n f r i c t i o n

slightly. Deviator s t r e s s e s were a p p l i e d by weights p l a c e d

on a hanger beneath the t a b l e of the frame. An a d d i t i o n a l

hanger was c o n s t r u c t e d which enabled the p l a c i n g or removal

of 250 pounds o f weights "instantaneously." In a c t u a l f a c t ,

l a r g e d e v i a t o r s t r e s s e s were n o t p l a c e d instantaneously,

but r a t h e r a p p l i e d c o n t i n u o u s l y over about a 10-second period

t o a v o i d impact effects.
- 142

The chamber p r e s s u r e was a p p l i e d by r e g u l a t e d com-

pressed a i r a c t i n g on an a i r / w a t e r i n t e r f a c e . A Fairchild

S t r a t o s p r e s s u r e r e g u l a t o r (0-100 p s i ) was used t o r e g u l a t e

compressed a i r t o -0.1 p s i . F i g u r e 45 shows a schematic

l a y o u t o f the s t r e s s - c o n t r o l l e d equipment.

The pore water p r e s s u r e and the chamber p r e s s u r e

were measured w i t h an e l e c t r i c a l transducer manufactured by

Data Sensors Inc. which measured a b s o l u t e p r e s s u r e s over a

range o f 150 p s i . Being an a b s o l u t e p r e s s u r e gauge, i t was

necessary t o make s m a l l c o r r e c t i o n s due t o changes i n b a r o -


-4

metric pressure. I t s r a t e d compliance f o r 150 p s i was 4x10

cubic inches. Output from the t r a n s d u c e r was run through a

s w i t c h i n g and b a l a n c i n g u n i t and then i n t o a Budd s t r a i n

i n d i c a t o r , which gave a d i g i t a l readout. C a l i b r a t i o n of the

readout enabled a c c u r a t e p r e s s u r e measurements o f -0.1 p s i .

A l l pore water l i n e s e x t e r n a l t o the c e l l used dur-

i n g pore p r e s s u r e measurements were 1/8-inch copper t u b i n g ,

w h i l e the s a t u r a t i o n s p i r a l f o r the t o p drainage lead was

heavy-walled nylon. Drainage and c o n s o l i d a t i o n were performed

a g a i n s t a back p r e s s u r e o f 15 p s i , which was used t o ensure 100

per cent, s a t u r a t i o n . The back p r e s s u r e was maintained by a


- 143

ATMOS. -X-i,X VACUUM


ATMOS. -X^. X VACUUM

LEGEND
® WHITEY BALL VALVE

X HOKE STEM VALVE

FIGURE 4 5 - SCHEMATIC LAYOUT OF


STRESS-CONTROLLED APPARATUS
- 144

mercury column. The volume change apparatus was similar to

t h a t d e s c r i b e d by Bishop and Henkel (1962) . Kerosene (dyed

r e d with Sudan I I I a n a l i n e dye) was used as the second fluid

i n the apparatus, which could measure a t o t a l volume change

of 100 c c . Drainage l i n e s were 1/4-inch o u t s i d e diameter

saran t u b i n g , as the compliance of these l i n e s was not im-

portant. The pore p r e s s u r e measuring system was connected

to a (Bishop and Henkel type) "Perspex" n u l l i n d i c a t o r , which

was used to check t h a t the system was d e - a i r e d and t o measure

compliance (Bishop and Henkel 1962, p 207).

A2 - Constant S t r a i n Rate Apparatus

A l l c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s were performed on a

Wykeham Farrance bench model t e s t i n g frame. Constant deforma-

t i o n r a t e s between 0.065 inches per minute and 0.000028 inches

per minute were p o s s i b l e with t h i s equipment. The t r i a x i a l cell,

i n which both 2.5-inch by 5.0-inch and 1.4-inch by 2.8-inch

specimens were t e s t e d , was built i n the UBC C i v i l Engineering

workshop. The bushing f o r the 1/4-inch diameter hardened

s t e e l ram was composed of two Thomson b a l l bushings used as a

guide w i t h an 0 - r i n g s e a l to stop leakage. F i g u r e 46 shows a


- 145

COMPRESSED
AIR

DYED
KEROSENE

TWO-WAY
VALVE

STRAIN SWITCHING AND


INDICATOR BALANCING UNIT

FIGURE 4 6 - SCHEMATIC LAYOUT OF


CONSTANT STRAIN RATE APPARATUS
- 146

s c h e m a t i c diagram o f t h e equipment l a y o u t . Pore w a t e r p r e s -

sure and chamber p r e s s u r e were measured w i t h a Data Sensors

t r a n s d u c e r , w h i c h was i n c o r p o r a t e d i n a volume change u n i t

s i m i l a r t o t h a t d e s c r i b e d b y Chan and Duncan (1967). Figure

47 shows a photograph o f t h e volume change u n i t . Connection

between t h i s u n i t and t h e t r i a x i a l c e l l was made u s i n g short

f l e x i b l e tubing. The bottom d r a i n a g e and chamber pressure

leads were.1/8-inch o u t s i d e diameter saran t u b i n g , w h i l e the

top drainage l e a d was a c o n t i n u a t i o n o f t h e h e a v y - w a l l e d nylon

s a t u r a t i o n s p i r a l from w i t h i n t h e chamber.

Regulated a i r pressure a c t i n g on a r u b b e r B e l l o f r a m

was used t o p r o v i d e t h e chamber and back p r e s s u r e . The

B e l l o f r a m was used t o reduce t h e amount o f a i r d i s s o l v e d i n

the water under pressure.

A x i a l l o a d s were measured u s i n g a c i r c u l a r load

c e l l made o f b e r y l l i u m c o p p e r . I t had a t h i n c e n t r a l d i a -

phragm w i t h s t r a i n gauges a t t a c h e d t o i t . S i n c e t h e diaphragm

d e f l e c t i o n was s m a l l when l o a d e d , t h e s t r a i n r a t e d u r i n g a

c o n t r o l l e d s t r a i n r a t e t e s t was c o n s t a n t . T h i s i s i n con-

t r a s t t o t h e s t r a i n r a t e s w h i c h occur when t h e a x i a l l o a d i s

measured u s i n g a " s o f t " p r o v i n g r i n g . I n t h i s case, t h e


- 147

FIGURE 4 7 - VOLUME CHANGE AND


PORE PRESSURE MEASURING UNIT
a c t u a l s t r a i n r a t e may vary by a f a c t o r of t h r e e d u r i n g a

"constant" s t r a i n rate t e s t .

Both pore pressures and a x i a l loads were measured

u s i n g a s w i t c h i n g and b a l a n c i n g u n i t i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a

Budd s t r a i n i n d i c a t o r . A s m a l l l o a d i n g p i s t o n was installed

above the l o a d c e l l t o p r o v i d e a s e a t i n g l o a d of 0.5 p s i dur-

ing c o n s o l i d a t i o n of samples. T h i s was r e q u i r e d t o ensure

t h a t the top cap of the sample maintained alignment with the 1

l o a d i n g rod d u r i n g c o n s o l i d a t i o n .

A3 - T e s t i n g Procedures -

S t r e s s - c o n t r o l l e d Apparatus

F i r s t l y , the system was checked to ensure t h a t i t

was d e - a i r e d . Continuous f i l t e r paper s i d e d r a i n s were then

cut from Whatman's No. 54 f i l t e r paper w i t h slits every 1/4-

inch. The porous stones were b o i l e d b e f o r e every t e s t t o

ensure removal of entrapped a i r and, while c o o l i n g , the

filter paper was p l a c e d i n the water to s a t u r a t e .

Since Haney c l a y i s f a i r l y firm i n i t s natural

s t a t e , i t was decided to r o l l the membranes up over the

sample, thus e n t r a p p i n g a minimum of a i r . Two membranes,

w i t h a l a y e r of Dow Corning s i l i c o n e grease between them,


- 149

were used t o e n c l o s e the sample. The membranes used were

standard 2.5-inch by 9-inch t r i a x i a l membranes, 0.012-inch

thick. To p r e r o l l these membranes, they were p u l l e d over a

powdered 2.5-inch diameter m a n d r i l and r o l l e d around a 2.5-

i n c h i n s i d e diameter O - r i n g . The membranes were t r a n s f e r r e d

from the m a n d r i l t o the base p e d e s t a l , ready f o r r o l l i n g up

around the sample.

The c l a y sample was c a r e f u l l y trimmed using taut

piano v/ire and a " s o i l l a t h e . " Water content specimens were

taken from the s i d e s t o o b t a i n the average i n i t i a l water con-

tent. A f t e r measuring the dimensions of the trimmed specimen

and g e t t i n g the i n i t i a l wet weight, the sample was carefully

p l a c e d on the base p e d e s t a l between the s a t u r a t e d s t o n e s .

The f i l t e r paper s i d e d r a i n s were then c a r e f u l l y p l a c e d around

the sample, the i n n e r membrane r o l l e d up, the s i l i c o n e grease

a p p l i e d and the o u t s i d e membrane r o l l e d up. F i g u r e 48 shows

a sample b e i n g i n s t a l l e d i n the a p p a r a t u s . The ends of the

sample were s e a l e d w i t h two O-rings top and bottom, these

b e i n g dropped i n p o s i t i o n from i n d i v i d u a l expanders previously

p l a c e d on the s a t u r a t i o n s p i r a l . A f t e r the t r i a x i a l c e l l was

assembled, chamber water was admitted from a d e - a i r e d water


- 150

FIGURE 4 9 - CREEP TEST IN PROGRESS


r e s e r v o i r and, when the chamber was f i l l e d , the chamber pres-

sure l i n e was connected t o the p r e s s u r e tank. As the chamber

p r e s s u r e was b e i n g r a i s e d i n increments, a p p r o p r i a t e weights

were p l a c e d on the l o a d i n g pan t o compensate f o r u p l i f t on

the l o a d i n g ram. A f t e r each increment of chamber pressure,

the pore water p r e s s u r e i n the sample was measured. Incre-

mental v a l u e s of Skempton "B" were c a l c u l a t e d to check f o r

s a t u r a t i o n and leakage.

The sample was then allowed t o c o n s o l i d a t e to an

e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s of 75 p s i w i t h a s m a l l s e a t i n g l o a d of 0.5

p s i t o ensure t h a t the l o a d i n g p i s t o n remained i n contact

w i t h the sample. I f the sample was t o be t e s t e d normally

consolidated, i t was allowed t o d r a i n f o r 36 hours; however,

if i t was to be tested after overconsolidation, i t was allowed

t o d r a i n f o r 24 hours and then rebounded f o r 36 h o u r s . Since

c o n s o l i d a t i o n u s u a l l y s t a r t e d around noon, samples were

finished c o n s o l i d a t i n g around midnight, one or two days

l a t e r , which l e f t about e i g h t hours u n t i l the next morning,

at which time s h e a r i n g would a c t u a l l y be started. For un-

drained t e s t s , the sample was left f o r these e i g h t hours i n

an undrained c o n d i t i o n , which p r o v i d e d an e x c e p t i o n a l l y good


- 152

check on p o s s i b l e leakage. For the h e a v i l y overconsolidated

drained t e s t s , s w e l l i n g was allowed to continue f o r an addi-

t i o n a l e i g h t hours, although the volume change was

exceptionally small. Figure 49 shows a t e s t i n p r o g r e s s .

For creep t e s t s , the creep l o a d was applied i n one

increment and, as the sample s t r a i n e d , c o r r e c t i o n s were

a p p l i e d to keep the d e v i a t o r stress constant. T h i s was dif-

f i c u l t t o do at the b e g i n n i n g of the t e s t and near creep

rupture, due t o the h i g h s t r a i n r a t e s and r e s u l t i n g area

changes. However, d u r i n g most of the t e s t s the deviator

s t r e s s was h e l d constant t o within' •i'O.l p s i .

At the end of the t e s t , the sample was back drained

t o an e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s of 1.0 psi. T h i s ensured t h a t a l a r g e

n e g a t i v e pore p r e s s u r e d i d not e x i s t i n the sample and re-

duced the p o s s i b i l i t y of a b s o r p t i o n of f r e e water by the

sample w h i l e b e i n g removed from the apparatus. The water

content of the whole sample a f t e r the t e s t was determined and

compared w i t h the water content based upon i n i t i a l side trim-

mings of c l a y at the s t a r t of the t e s t , a l l o w i n g for the

ensuing volume changes. Most t e s t s were found t o have up to

-0.5 per cent a d d i t i o n a l water a f t e r the t e s t ; most of t h i s


a d d i t i o n a l water h a v i n g been s u p p l i e d by the f i l t e r paper

during i n s t a l l a t i o n . In g e n e r a l , f o r the undrained tests,

the pore p r e s s u r e change d u r i n g the e i g h t hours b e f o r e shear

was used t o i n d i c a t e whether s m a l l l e a k s i n the membrane or

around the O-rings existed.

A4 - T e s t i n g Procedures - Constant
S t r a i n Rate Apparatus

As .many t e s t i n g procedures as p o s s i b l e were main-

t a i n e d the same f o r constant s t r a i n r a t e and s t r e s s - c o n t r o l l e d

tests. Most c o n s t a n t s t r a i n r a t e t e s t s were performed on

1.4-inch by 2.8-inch samples, although some 2.5-inch by 5.0-

i n c h samples were a l s o used. F o r the s m a l l samples, two com-

mercial "Sheik" membranes w i t h s i l i c o n e grease i n between

were used t o g e t h e r w i t h f i l t e r paper side d r a i n s . S i n c e no

d e - a i r e d water s u p p l y was a v a i l a b l e near the t e s t i n g frame,

the t r i a x i a l c e l l , t o g e t h e r w i t h the i n s t a l l e d sample, had t o

be c a r r i e d from the water s u p p l y . To m a i n t a i n s a t u r a t i o n i n

the drainage leads from the c e l l during t h i s operation, small

i n d i v i d u a l r e s e r v o i r s were a t t a c h e d t o each drainage line.

F i g u r e 50 shows a sample b e i n g i n s t a l l e d i n the c e l l w i t h the

i n d i v i d u a l r e s e r v o i r s a t t a c h e d t o the c e l l ' s v e r t i c a l p o s t s .
- 154

FIGURE 51 - C O N S T A N T STRAIN RATE T E S T IN P R O G R E S S


- 155

A f t e r the t r i a x i a l c e l l was p o s i t i o n e d i n the t e s t i n g frame,

a s m a l l chamber p r e s s u r e was applied. The drainage leads

were then c a r e f u l l y d i s c o n n e c t e d from the i n d i v i d u a l r e s e r -

v o i r s and connected t o the volume change d e v i c e . The con-

n e c t i o n was made w i t h a "bead" of water p r e s e n t a t the end of

the leads t o ensure t h a t no a i r was trapped w h i l e making the

connection. No d i f f i c u l t y was encountered with t h i s procedure

d u r i n g the t e s t i n g program.

Before c o n s o l i d a t i o n , a s e a t i n g l o a d of 0.5 p s i was

a p p l i e d by the l o a d i n g p i s t o n . C o n s o l i d a t i o n pressures and

times were kept the same as f o r those of the stress-controlled

tests. ( F i g u r e 51 shows a t e s t i n p r o g r e s s .
- 156

APPENDIX B

TYPICAL RESULTS FROM CREEP


RUPTURE TESTS

All data o b t a i n e d from s t r e s s and s t r a i n r a t e

c o n t r o l l e d t r i a x i a l t e s t s were punched onto computer cards,

t o be processed by the UBC computer (IBM 7040). Not only d i d

t h i s save t e d i o u s c a l c u l a t i o n , but i t l e f t the data i n a

form which c o u l d e a s i l y be used i n any way d e s i r a b l e at a

later date.

The following l i s t e x p l a i n s the v a r i o u s columns of

the computer output:

(1) - E l a p s e d Time ( t )

The t o t a l time i n minutes s i n c e s h e a r i n g was initiated.

(2) - D e v i a t o r S t r e s s (0"o)

The t o t a l l o a d i n pounds a c t i n g on the sample d i v i d e d

by the c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l area i n square inches c o r r e c t e d

f o r b o t h a x i a l s t r a i n and volume change, assuming the

sample deforms as a r i g h t c i r c u l a r c y l i n d e r . In o t h e r

words:
AoLo-AV
A =
Lo - A L
- 157

where: A average c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l area

initial c r o s s - s e c t i o n a l area

initial length

AV change i n volume

AL change i n l e n g t h

The first column of computer output under the heading,

"Deviator S t r e s s " g i v e s the s t r e s s a t the time of the

r e a d i n g , w h i l e the second column g i v e s the s t r e s s j u s t

a f t e r the r e a d i n g . The d i f f e r e n c e i n s t r e s s i s due to

s m a l l a d d i t i o n a l loads p l a c e d on the sample t o maintain

the d e v i a t o r s t r e s s "constant."

(3) - Per cent Strain

The shear s t r a i n i n per cent c a l c u l a t e d by:

X 100%

(4) - Pore Pressure (u)

The pore water p r e s s u r e i n p s i c a l c u l a t e d from the

transducer calibration; f o r d r a i n e d t e s t s t h i s column

i s used f o r water content.


- 158

(5) - Major P r i n c i p a l Effective


S t r e s s (OV)

The major p r i n c i p a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s i n p s i d e f i n e d

by:

oV = C T 3 + f J D - U

(6) - Minor P r i n c i p a l Effective

Stress (0"')
3

The minor p r i n c i p a l e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s i n p s i d e f i n e d

by:
CT = CT - U
1
3

(7) - P r i n c i p a l E f f e c t i v e S t r e s s R a t i o (0"/ /0~ )


3

(8) - Mean Normal Effective


S t r e s s (p)

The mean normal e f f e c t i v e s t r e s s i n p s i d e f i n e d by:

P = toy + 2CT ') 3

(9) - Roscoe q/p

The r a t i o q/p d e f i n e d by:

q/p = (a, - cr' ) /p = a /p1


3 D

T h i s r a t i o can be r e l a t e d t o the p r i n c i p a l effective

stress r a t i o .
- 159

(10) - Skempton "A"

Pore Pressure Parameter

Since a l l samples were 100 per cent s a t u r a t e d , Skempton

"A" was calculated by:


A U
Skempton "A 1

A CT D

where: A U = pore p r e s s u r e change from the s t a r t


of t e s t

A 0"
D = change i n d e v i a t o r s t r e s s from s t a r t
of t e s t

T h i s column i s b l a n k f o r d r a i n e d tests.

(11) - S t r a i n Rate (f)

The s t r a i n r a t e i n per cent per minute was calculated from

shear s t r a i n and e l a p s e d time data, as d i s c u s s e d i n

the following. R e f e r r i n g t o F i g u r e 52, c o n s i d e r t h r e e

observed p o i n t s on the s t r a i n / t i m e c u r v e . I t i s de-

s i r e d t o o b t a i n the s t r a i n r a t e a t time t 2 . Assuming

a linear variation of s t r a i n w i t h time, the s t r a i n

r a t e at time ** 2
is ^ ~ ^'
2
, and the s t r a i n rate
2
t8-t,
at time — - =— is — - — . Now assuming a linear
2 t - t
variation of s t r a i n r a t e from time * * 2
t o time
2

, then/

"2 t -*i
3 »e"t, t,-t, t 3 - t 2
FIGURE 5 2 - CALCULATION OF STRAIN RATES
- 161

Since the c a l c u l a t i o n of a s t r a i n r a t e by t h i s method

r e q u i r e s one s e t of readings b e f o r e and a f t e r the time

at which the s t r a i n r a t e i s b e i n g obtained, no value

of s t r a i n r a t e i s calculated f o r the f i r s t and last

readings of any test.

(12) - Time to Rupture (ttr )

The d u r a t i o n of time i n minutes remaining u n t i l the

sample a c t u a l l y ruptured.

ttr = t r -t

where: t r = rupture time

I f t h i s column i s blank, the sample d i d not r u p t u r e .


m
CN Ul ^ vlJI ^1
\jn u i
ru ru ro ru N
NO OJ M fU fs*fuN)
ui u*
> M M M f\> r\>
Urul W N> H *~ f* * M O ^ Ul UN H PO W P-*
-
3C —
H r
PO f-< vO CD fO> UO
J> .** J>
J ^3 Cf - J l>4> ON CO CO O J- rCD «
J>

O Ul O O OUl O Ul Ul o HOo sfl Org u co u i . ui- 2-<rnI -o


o o <a co - J . u i u i J > UJ

O 00 o NO UJ "o UJ N NJO Ul -4 Ul Ul H -

i>MHOO GO
Ul
H
o o o Ul U l
>0 U J J>
o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O O -J
OO O oO oO o CN CD
o O O O UlO
— m

O'O o o o o
4>J>4> J> J> J> J> J>
J> J> J> J> J> Js J>U J UJ u* Ul UJ UJ.» J> u> ^ -ff* J> ^
J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> J> ^
J> J> J> J>
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJu> UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ

Ul U
OJ CUl I«VJ.U-
)
O W-J J -4 -J. Ul U-JJ UJ UJ UJ U>UlUJCN CN CN Ul Ul -0. ~4 ^
-JU-J UJ UJ O
*- «0 CO sC Ul o ~ o-I
nm
UJ UJ -«J -J -J -J -J UJ UJ
-J
<
•XJ 7C -*
c/i m >
»- c-i -t
J> J> J> J> J> *• J> J> > ^ j> — On O
00 U>
UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ u»

CO CO CD CO O
C
ODC
0D
0 CO OS C
0O
0 CO CO CO C
C
OO 0C
0D 00 CD CO 00
CO CO CD CO CCO
D
UJ UJ UJ
C O CO C O co 00\D vO-O CO
UJ UJ
>0

'•-•-OOO O O O J^ <0 C D
CD CD CO -J —J —J O CN UtUl J>
-J ru ru J> UJ UJ UJ
t/i m
UJO-JOUJCN>oUUl 00 •*> ru *o J> NO vO 73 O
CD O CD O J> J> i— lN O
O *- Ul J> -J
4J
-0
UJ
\J1 U J

**4, vfi UJ J> ro UJ Ul UJ CN h- s0 CN


CN CN C* O CN } CN ON O Ul"l Ul Ul Ul Ul J>
CD CO -J W CNWIUMl H O 'OU — rn T>
1 1

-J -4 -J
o o o
-J
o
t> c* o
o
c>
o
-J -J -J -J. CN 4> UJ CO •owa
CN CN CN C N CN I—

O
Ul J> UJ t\J f\l •t— O O -O yQ sO s
O »
© «C Co
— O O >Q CD CN NO r-> *G COCN \— -J UJ Ul \0 UJru-gh*oco CN CO Ul Ul fU O
CO %o •Jj »-» UJ *0
J> UJ
n CO X CO o
«-> c m
— ?o 2
m

0*" CN CN CN 0* ON
0^ Cf* 0 0 CNCNO CN CN CN CN s s

jj W W W UJ uJ UJ .*» UJ>**J> J> > i> J >> Ul f> CN CNCN00-J -J -4


-J -4 CO CO CD
CN CN C N CN (J* ^
'jJ •o m - «

i— ro J> J> u i O
C*N CO 00 I J> Ul CN CO 0 00 CN J> JiJ>j^> vOo o r-oo ,
sO <oUl O U) -J \O
*J H
nJ r- 4> O J> on -ri o
oU

*G •&
•fi <0 4) 4 X <D ro ru ru ru u> UJJ> C
NO
CN
JN
> UOl ui<
-J
M
CO CO
-0
•o m t-H C
Ul O *J CO 00 >c
OO J3 NO J> CN - 0 00 >0 NO ^ <0 Ul M Ul Ul -J. Ul OOISJ ru ui ui oo J> Tl CD
iS>

uJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ W UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ UJ
UJ ro f\j rsj ru ru ru ru ru ruro NO M NO NO M ru rur\j f— i — ^ -< 2
\J l\j IS) Osfi sO vO CO CN- 4 CN Ul Ul O \0 to -s)0
UJ UJ UJ
>fl CD CO Ul ^
*• J>
Ul -»J CN 1>3D O
J> *o c* ro«g - J CCon
n">O
i— »— ru CN CN

UJ W W UJ UJ w j> j> J> J> J> J> Ul UlUlUl -J -J


J> J> J> on Z
J> J> J> J> Ul O ru ui CN CO
N- Ul Ul
UJ J> »0 CN CN
O X
JN CO Ul CNcoCOvoO ui ru o jo m
r— *-* U J U J .J> UlUl CN CN -J COr-OUJ UJ Ul CN COUl <0 >o U J -^J oCO CN UJ UC J> (— o UJ H-
UJ
m 3: i »

V
VI
II>2
o o o o o o o o o o o
2
PO f\) NjtfU NJ r\j -J
(\) (f\l
S) MW N N» NJ lr\)j r\j ro f\) O O O O sO 4> *0 00 -J CN C O a
-J. 0 CN CN Ul Ul j>
NJ NJ
CO CD C D ; CD Q0 -0 ro
-J
s
J> J> UJ UJ -4 Ul UJ H> OJ> Ul PO vC
ON ro o CO
C O CO -0
a

o o o o o o o o o o o

tv» ro f\j!fy f\j rsj rsj rvj r\j iO *o -j


ui j> J> j J> j> u> w u> f\> r\> M rO POO Po CN CN O C
OO OO
ui ^ -sj u> on u>
CO CO
UJ CO N o CO PO

•— * " o o O

o o o o O O O O O O O O O O O o o o o o o o o o o o o O O O O O OiOOOOOOOO o o o
OlO o O o o o o
O roO O O O O On
o o o o o o o o o o o o o
c*! u*ro ru N
o o o o o o o o o o 0 > - M
cr >— ui o O
ro ro ru o roo or uou>o o O
J > GO J> o o o o o o o o o o
^CM O — • - • - » - o CN Ul J>
O ' O
v O U l H | > > - M c rg O
o o >-* ro UJ
J> - J N O . C O CO
Ul 00Ol -1> 4>U J NO NO
ui rv ui >o Ul o-J Ul O 00 r C" r- o
CN
* o Ul - J UJ '
CC r uUl N O CN C N Uu»
loc -
-o U l f\ji o
UJ CO ui CO NO

U> T- U>
CO; UJ 20 Ul 4* CO C
O
M
J> -J Ul ui co
UJ
Vi ro c o U»
M
C O -r
» J
J>
~4 r\> O PO
CD » — C N
^;.UJ
J>
J>
m i-.
M

Ul O
*>

C
N Kj
-0
v
fl »— Ul Ul
O
W CO J> Ul o
U J NO O
O U 1
-J

2
Ul UJ
H H- 4J
Mt-0 UJ vii «£)
t-«iUJ
fV
- 0 - OJ

CN
» -
J?» N M NO CD O J> CN
«U0J O r\i o
W N UJ
J>

CN CD O Ulu<t J> CN *g \>J (v \jj UJ sO -o


J> CN CN O
* O Jl"COCO O sO CD O
t— UJ J >C O J>
o ru U
UJINJ UJ IT CO CN J?"
o NO « 0 CN J>

*OC D JJ Ul -4 tx UJ
N) S * 00 CN JO 0

^ _ i - ru f\J f\> VU UJ u i *j co kO y t , iO r*
v ru ro ru roNNifyrjiNjNWN ro-ro
- rv u> jjrui wi ui CT» cr cr CN cr u*o
NO
I
»- ro x- coi'O o Nwm ui
J>
i -co ru o ui' UJ
NU'UW CN CN « U J CN co o »—!»— K - ^ - CN
sO« C U> U> K- -J
UJN-*«Oj-^ » O SO UljtT J> J> « J> J> <OMQ»-* O Ul - O
iC <C f r 4J
*o PO OJul O sO Ul r'jUl -O CO CO >iJ
>0 4 J * > >0

O O O'O o o o o oto o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o o
« oj>o ruo ru
o o o
o o o o o O O O O Ul o .
J>

C9T
ELAPSED DEVIATOR PERCENT PORE SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCDE SKEMPTDN STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EPF EFF STRESS NORMAL Q/P A KATE Tj
'WIN) (PSI) (PSI) IPS!) I PSI ) RATIO STRESS (PERCENT/MIN) RUPTlME

2611.0 43.3 43.8 14.55 70.6 67.8 19.4 3.23 33.9 1.28 1.25 0.23499433 8.0
2613.0 43.5 43.5 15.08 70.5 63.0 19.5 3.22 34.0 1.28 1.24 0.29724867 6.0
2614.0 43.3 43.3 15.39 70.5 62.9 19.5 3.22 34.0 1.27 1.25 3.33181250 5.3
2615.0 43.2 43.4 15.74 70.4 62.7 19.6 3.20 34.0 1.27 1.25 0.33780594 4.0
2617.0 42.9 42.9 16.67 70.3 62.6 19.7 3.17 34.0 1.26 1.26 "'" ~0. 5979T3W :~270~
Z618.0 42.5 42.5 17.34 70.2 62.4 19.8 3.14 34.0 1.25 1.26 0.78805470 1.0
2619.0 42.1 42.1 18.25 70.0 62.1 20.0 3.10 34.1 1.23 1.27 0.00000003 0.0

CREEP RUPTURE FAILURE


OVER CONSOLIDATED UNDRAIMED CREEP TEST NO. C- 15 (OVE« CONSOLIUATION HAT 10 2)

ELAPSED DEVIATOR PERCENT PORE SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCOE SKEMP10M STRAIN T 1 ME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL Q/P A RATE T3
IMIN) (PSI) IPS!) (PSI) (PSI) RATIO STRESS (PERCENT/MI^) RUPTURE

0.0 0.6 40.0 0.00 14.7 38.4 37.8 1.02 38.0 0.02 0.00 U.00000003 2045.0
0.5 39.6 39.6 0.95 29.4 62.8 23.1 2.71 36. 3 1.09 0.38 1.02384866 2044.5
1.0 39.6 39.6 1.02 28.2 63.9 24.3 2.63 37.5 1.05 0.34 0. i3294956 :2044.0
2.0 39.6 40.0 1.11 27.2 64.9 25.3 2.56 38.5 1.03 0. 32 0.07709704 2D43.0
4.0 40.0 40.0 1.23 26.7 65.8 25.8 2.55 39. 1 1.02 JK30_ _0_'A5J)0274T 204U0_
8.0 39.9 40.0 1.36 26.2 66 26.3 2.52 39.6 1.01 0.29 0.02808869 2037.0
15.0 39.9 40.0 1.50 26.1 66, 26.4 2.51 39.7 1 .01 0.29 0.01729822 2030.0
30. 39.9 40.0 1.68 2C-.-3 66 26.2 2.53 39.5 1.01 0.30 0.01060700 2015.0
58. 39.9 40.0 1.89 26.8 65 25.7 2.55 39.0 1.02 0.31 0.00680086 1987.0
93. 39.9 40.0 2.09 27.4 65 25.1 2.59 38.4 1 .04 0.32 0.00512002 1952.0
144. 39.9 40.0 2.31 64 24.6 2.62 37.9 1.05 0.34 0.00363962 1901.0
202.0 39.9 40.0 2.51 28.5 63.9 24.0 2.66 37.3 1.07 0.35 0.00319201 1843.0
292.0 39.9 40.0 2.76 29.2 23.3 2.71 3fr.6 1.09 0.37 0.00265933 1753.0
407.0 39.9 40.0 3.04 29.8 6?.6 22.7 2.75 36.0 1.11 0.38 0.00236078 1633.0
624.0 39.8 40.0 3.51 30.6 61.7 21.9 2.82 35.2 1.13 0.41 0.00205899 1421.0
790.0 39.9 40.0 3.84 31.2 61.2 21.3 2.87 34.6 1.15 0.42 0.00194667 1255.0
1200.0 39.7 40.0 4.61 32.3 59.9 20.2 2.96 33.5 1.19 0.45 0.00212673 845.0
1492.0 39.7 40.0 5.28 33. 1 19.4 T2T6~ -074T" 0.002"8T5T3~ "~5T3TCr
1706.0 39.7 40.0 5.98 33.7 5 8.5 18.8 3.11 32.0 1.24 0.49 0.00426227 339.0
1852.0 39.7 40.0 6.70 34.2 58.0 18.3 3.16 31.6 1.26 0.50 0.00705417 193.0
1974.0 39.5 40.0 7.78 34.8 57.2 17.7 3.23 30.9 1.28 0.52 0.01592123 71.0
1986.0 39.9 40.0 7.98 34.8 57.7 17.7 3.25 31.1 1.29 0.51 0.01836962 59.0
2000.0 39.9 40.0 8.27 34.8 57.6 17.7 3.25 31.0 J.29 0.51 0.02362803 45_.0_
2012.0 39.9 40.0 8.58 34.9 57.4 17.6 3.27 30.9 1.29 ,51 0.03T5 3631" 33 . 0
2023.0 39.8 40.0 8.98 35.0 57.4 17.5 3.27 30.8 1.29 ,52 0.04698402 22.0
2027.0 39.9 40.0 9. 19 35.0 57.4 17.5 3.28 30.8 1.30 ,52 0.05604669 18.0
2032.0 39.9 40.0 9. 50 35.1 57.3 17.4 3.29 30. 7 1.30 ,52 0.07774808 13.0
2036.0 39.8 40.0 9.86 35.2 5 7.2 17.3 3.30 30.6 1.30 0.52 0.11099525 9.0
2039.0 39.9 40.0 10.24 35.1 57.2 17.4 3.29 30.7 U30 0.52 0^16586690 _6.0
57.1 17.4 3.27 30.7 i.29 0.52 "6.40397511 ' 2.5
2042.5 39.7 40.0 10.98 35.1
57.3 17.8 3.22 31.0 1.28 0.51 1.61595386 D.5
2044.5 39.5 39.8 12.01 34.7
57.7 18.3 3.15 31.4 1.25 0.50 0 .00000000 0.0
2045.0 39.3 39.3 12.95 34.2

CREEP RUPTURE FAILURE


OVER CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED CEEP TEST NO. C- 20 (OVER CUNSOLIDATIOM RAT I 3
6)
y
ELAPSED DEVIATOR PERCENT PORE SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN RDSCOE SKEMPTON STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL 0/P A RATE TO
(MIN) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) RATIO STRESS (PERCENT/MIN) RUPTURE

0.0 0.6 30.3 0.00 15.2 12.9 12.3 1.05 12.5 0.05 0.00 0.00000000 1925.5
0.5 29.7 30.2 2.02 19.3 37.9 8.2 4.61 18. 1 1.64 0.14 2.21132226 1925.0
1.0 30. 1 30.3 2.21 18.6 39.0 8.9 4.38 18.9 1.59 0.11 0.31746032 1924.5
2.0 30.2 30.3 2.41 17.6 40.1 9.9 4.05 20.0 1.51 0.08 0.17780502 1923.5
.4.0 __3_0_-2_ 2.68 .liL.ja.__ _4J_Q...
41.6
-J_L_7.. 3.81 _1___45_ -Q._G_L.
0.03
j_a.a9.p804_.-_ ..J_22.l_.5_
7.0 30.2 30.3 2.90 16.2 11.3 3.67 21.4 1 .41 1918.5
42.0 21.8 1.39 0.02 0.06428036 1914.5
11.0 30.2 30.3 3.10 15.8 11.7 3.58
42.3 22. 1 1.37 0.01 0.04394032 1908.5
17.0 30.2 30.3 3.31 15.5 12.0 3.51
42.5 1 .35 0.00 0.03102099 1900.5
25.0 30.2 30.3 3.52 15.2 12.3 3.46 22.4
42.7 1.34 -0.01 0.02274224 1890.5
35.0 30.2 30.3 3.71 15.1 12.4 3.43 22.5
42.8 -0.01 0.01588126 1875.5
50.0 30.2 30.3 3.92 15.0 12.5 __f_2 _?__.• 6 J__?__ 0.01289701 1849.5
76.0 30.2 30.3 4.19 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.39 22.7 1.33 -0.01 0.00929909 1322.5
103.0 30.2 30. 3 4.41 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.39 22.7 1.33 -0.01 0.00741801 1768.5
157.0 30.2 30.3 4.74 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.38 22.8 1.33 -0.01 0.00538536 1695.5
230.0 30.2 30.3 5.06 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.37 22.8 1.33 -0.02 0.00418313 1627.5
298.0 30.2 30.3 5.33 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.39 22. 7 1 .33 -0.01 0.00369388 1557.5
368.0 30.2 30.3 5.57 14.9 42.9 12.6 3.39 22. 7 -Ot_3_L 0.00333577 " 1492"! 5
433.0 30.2 30.3 5.78 14.9 47.9 12.6 3.40 22.7 1.33 0.00308917
12.6 3.40 22.6 1.33 -0.01 0.00272161 1341.5
584.0 30.2 30.3 6.21 14.9 42.7
12.5 3.41 22.6 1.34 -0.01 0.00265025 1207.5
718.0 30.2 30.3 6.56 15.0 42.7
12.5 3.42 22.5 1.34 -0.01 0.00259480 1091.5
834.0 30.2 30.3 6.87 15.0 42.7
12.3 3.43 22.3 1.34 -0.01 0.00340346 525.5
1400.0 29.9 30.3 8.16 15.2 42.2 _ -463L.5_-
1462.0 _.3J___J__- _10__3_ _X5.^2_ ___.6_ . J Z . 3.. __3__45_ -..22.JL 1.35 -0.00 _Q_.Q 0174457.-
-_8_JL_L 403.5
1522.0 30.2 30.3 8.62 15.2 42.5 12.3 3.45 22.4 1.35 __0_._3.Q_ 0.00428221
1.35 351.5
1574.0 30.2 30.3 8.85 15.2 42.6 12.3 3.45 22.4 -0.66 0.00480084
1.35 295.5
1630.0 30.2 30.3 9 . 14 15.2 42.5 12.3 3.45 22.4 -0.00 0.00579695
1.34 257.5
1668.0 30.2 30.3 9.38 15.1 4 2.7 12.4 3.43 22.5 -0.00 0.00671164
1.35 227.5
1698.0 30.2 30.3 9.59 15.1 42.6 12.4 3.44 22.4 -0.01 0.00739151
JU35_ __. 197_,.5._
1728.0 30.2 30.3 9.82 _15a_. _4 ?j_6 12.. 4 3_._44_ 22.5 -0.00 0.00832227
1.34 169.5
1756.0 30.2 30.3 10.07 15.1 42.6 12.4 3.43 22.5 __0.00 0.00979047"
1.34 149.5
1776.0 30.2 30.3 10.28 15.1 42.7 12.4 3.43 22.5 -0.01 0.01091307
1.34 131.5
1794.0 30.2 30.3 10.48 15.1 4?.7 12.4 3.43 22.5 -0.01 0.01197797
1 .34 111.5
1814.0 30.2 30.3 10.74 15.0 42.7 12.5 3.42 22.5 -0.01 0.01414719
1.34 95.5
1830.0 30.2 30.3 10.98 15.0 4?.7 12.5 3.42 22.5 -0.01 0.01669051
83.5
1642.0 3C.2 30.3 11. 19 15.0 12.5 __.*2__ 22.5 J •!> -0.01 0.01852987
7 3 .5
1852.0 30.2 30.3 11. 39 15.0 4'.7 12.5 3.42 22.6 1.34 -Q.01 0.67050282
62.5
1863.0 30.2 30.3 11.63 15.0 42.7 12.5 3.41 22.6 1.34 -0.01 0.02360412
53.5
30.2 30.3 15. 42.8 12.5 3.41 22.6 1.34 -0.01 0.02690920
1872.0 11.85 44.5
30.2 30.3 14. 12.6 3.40 22. 1.33 -0.01 0.03199623
1881.0 12.11 42.8 37.5
30.2 30.3 14. 12.6 3.40 22. 1 .33 -0.01 0.03819838
1888.0 12.35 42.8 32.5
__L8.9i._XL _3_>.-2_ ___3_0_.3__ _1.2...5__. 14. .42.8.. 12.6 3.40 - .22. L.33 -0.01 _Q. 04394032. 27.5
30.2 30.3 14. 42.9 12.6 3.39 22. 1.33 7.0 .01 _ 0.05012832 23.5
1898.0 12. 79
30.2 30.3 14.8 42.9 12.7 3.39 22. 1.33 -0.01 0.057939^2 18.5
1902.0 13.00
30.2 30.3 14.8 47.9 12.7 3.38 22. 1 .33 -0.01 C.07357443
1907.0 13. 33
-0.01
ELAPSED DEVIATUR PERCENT PORE SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCOE SKEMPTON STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL Q/P A RATE TO '.
(MIN) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) .( PSI ) RAT 10 STRESS .... .<PERCENT/M1 N) _ . ..8.«J£-I.yAi

1912.0 30.2 30.3 13.74 14.8 4'.9 12.7 3.37 22.8 1.32 -0.02 0.09707746 13.5
1917.0 30.1 30.3 14.30 14.7 4?.9 12.8 3.35 22.8 1.32 -0.02 0.13815654 8.5
1922.0 30.0 30.3 15.12 14.6 42.9 12.9 3.32 22.9 1.31 -0.02 0.48840179 3.5
1925.0 29.6 29.6 17. 17 13_.7 43. 3_ 13.8 3.15 23.6 1.25 -0.05 4.37184272 0.5
1925.5 28.7 28.7 19.66 11.8 44.4 15.7 2.83 25.3 1.13 -0.12 0.00006600" 0/5"

CREEP RUPTURE FAILURE

I
OVER CONSOLIDATED UNDRAINED CREEP TEST NO. C- 35 (OVER CONSOLIDATION RA1IO 25 )

ELAPSED DEVIATOR PERCENT PORE STG I SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCOE SKEMPTON STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL Q/P A RATE TO
(MIN) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) RATIO STRESS ( PERCENT /M I ,N ) RUPTURE

0.0 0.6 16.0 0.00 14.5 4. 1 3.5 1.16 3. 7 0.15 0.00 0.00000000 141.5
0.5 15.6 15.6 2.79 16.1 17.4 1 .9 9.37 7.0 2.21 0. 11 3.0440023? 141.0
1.0 15.5 16.0 3.04 16.1 17.4 1.9 9.03 7. 1 2.18 0.10 0.44203333 140.5
2.0 16.0 16.0 3.37 15.8 IB.2 2.2 8.16 7.5 2.11 0.08 0.28564733 139.5
4.0 15.9 16.0 3.79 15.2 IP.8 2.8 6.60 8.2 1.95 0.04 0.17580871 13 7.5
6.0 16.0 16.0 4.07 14.7 19.2 3.3 5.88 8.6 1.86 O'.Ol "0.12407072 1 35.5
8.0 16.0 16.0 4.29 14.4 19.6 3.6 5.45 8. 9 1.79 -0.01 0.10273926 133.5
11.0 16.0 16.0 4.56 14.0 19.9 4.0 5.03 9.3 1.72 -0.03 0.08371844 130.5
14.0 16.0 16.0 4.79 13.8 2C.2 4.2 4.79 9. 5 1.68 -0.05 0.07233273 127.5
17.0 16.0 16.0 5.00 13.6 20.4 4.4 4.63 9.7 1 .64 -0.06 0.06764450 124.5
20.0 16.0 16.0 5.20 13.4 20.5 .4.6 4.49 9.9 1.61 0 .06195J_65_ 121.5
23. 16.0 16.0 5.37 13.3 20.7 4.7 4.42 10.0 1.60 -0.08" 0.05556513 118.5
27. 16.0 16.0 5.58 13.2 20.8 4.8 4.31 10. 1 1.57 -0.09 0.05224030 114.5
31, 16.0 16.0 5. 79 13.1 20.9 4.9 4.23 10.3 1.55 -0.09 0.04947761 -110.5
35. 16.0 16.0 5.98 12.9 21.0 5.1 4.15 10.4 1.54 -0.10 0.04768633 106.5
40.0 16.0 16.0 6.21 12.8 21.2 5.2 4.07 10.5 1.52 -0.11 0.04681534 101.5
45.0 16.0 16.0 6.45 12.7 21.3 5.3 4.02 10.-6 1 .50 -0.12 0.04581072 96.5
50.0 16.0 16.0 6.67 12.6 21.3 5.4 3.97 10.7 T.49 -"OTTT" ~T5T04"56"0~98'r "7I7T
55.0 16.0 16.0 6.90 1-2.6 21.4 5.4 3.95 10. 7 1.49 -0.13 0.04621258 86.5
60.0 16.0 7.13 12.5 21.5 5.5 3.91 10. 8 1.48 -0.13 0.04641350 81.5
16.0
65.0 3.87 10.9 1.47 -0.13 0.04641350 76.5
16.0 16.0 7.37 12.4 21.5 5.6
70.0 3.84 10.9 1 .46 -0.14 0.04721720 71.5
16.0 L6.0 7.60 12.4 21.6 5.6
0.04942736 _66-5
75.0 16.0 16.0 7.84 12.4 21.6 5.6 3.83 JI_ 1.46 -0.14
0.05096778 51.5
80.0 16.0 16.0 8.09 12.3 21.7 5.7 3.79 11.0 1.45 -0.14
0.05274262 57.5
84.0 16.0 16.0 8.30 12.3 2 1.7 5.7 3.78 11. 1 1.44 -0.15
0.05324492 53.5
88.0 16.0 16.0 8.52 12.2 21.7 5.8 3.77 11. 1 1.44 - 0 . 15
0.05450071 49.5
92.0 16.0 16.0 8.72 12.2 21.8 5.8 3.75 11.1 1.43 - 0 . 15
0.05927266 45.5
96.0 16.0 16.0 8.95 12.2 21.8 5.8 3.73 11.2 1.43 -0.15
0.C6283667 41.5.
1C0.0 16.0 16.0 9.20 12.1 21.8 5.9 3.72 U.2 1.43 -0.15
.06530036 38.5
103.0 16.0 16.0 9. 39 12.1 21.9 5.9 3.71 11.2 1.42 -0.16
106.0 16.0 16.0 9.59 12.1 21.9 5.9 3.70 11.2 1.42 - 0 . 16 0.06898399 35.5
109.0 16.0 16.0 9.80 12.1 21.9 5.9 3.70 11.2 1.42 -0.16 0.07766762 32.5
112.0 16.0 16.0 10.03 12.0 21.9 6.0 3.68 11.3 1.42 - 0 . 16 0.07668608 29.5
115.0 16.0 16.0 10. 26 12.0 21.9 6.0 3.67 11.3 1.41 0.16 0.08639743 26.5
12.0 21.9 3.67 _- _ 1.41 0.16 0.09242517 23.5
118.0 16.0 16.0 10.54
6
JL°_
"6.0 "3T65"
3

11. 4" 1.41" 0.T7" C.09610&73 20.T"


121.0 16.0 16.0 10.82" 12 "22.15
11.02 1? 22.0 6.0 3.65 11.4 1.41 0.1 7 0.10548570 18.5
123.0 16.0 16.0
11 2?.0 6.1 3.64 11.4 1.40 0.17 0.11804301 15.5
125.0 16.0 16.0 11, 24
11 22.1 6.1 3.62 11.4 1.40 0.1 7 0.13110310 14.5
127.0 16.0 16.0 11, 49 0.14667472
11 22.1 6.1 3.61 11.4 1 .40 0.17 12.5
129.0 16.0 16.0 11. 76 O . i 732971.4 10.5
2?_1 3_.60 1.39 0.17
131.0 16.0 16.0 17.08 11
77.1
A.L 3.58
Ll_5
1 . 39 0". 18 6.20845887 8.5
133.0 16.0 16.0 12.46 11.8 6.2 11.5"
11.3 22.2 3.56 11.5 1.38 0. 18 C.25P69000 6.5
135.0 15.9 16.0 17.91 6.2
11.7 22.2 6.3 3.53 11.6 1.37 0.18 0.35412899 4.5
137.0 15.9 16.0 1 3. 49
ELAPSED DEVIATOR PERCENT PORE SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCOE- SKEMPTON STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN PRESSURE EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL O/P A RATE TO
1MIN) IPS!) _ (PSI) ( PSI ) (PSI ) RATIO STRESS (PERCENT/MIN) J_!_L!__JL„

139.0 15.9 16.0 14.33 11.6 22.2 6.4 3.50 11.6 1.36 -0.19 .0.62537670 2.5
141.0 15.7 15.7 15.99 11.5 27.2 6.5 3.41 11.7 1.34 -0.20 0.00000000 0.5

CREEP RUPTURE FAILURE


HOC

OVER- CONSOLIDATED DRAINED CREEP TEST NO. C- 22 (OVER CONSOLIDATION RATIO = 25)

ELAPSED DEVIATOR SHEAR WATER SIG 1 SIG 3 PRINCIPAL MEAN ROSCOE STRAIN TIME
TIME STRESS STRAIN CONTENT EFF EFF STRESS NORMAL Q/P RATE TO
IMIN) (PSI) (PSI) (PSI) RATIO STRESS (PERCENT/MIN) RUPTURE

0.0 0.6 14.6 0.00 36.4 3.6 3.0 1.19 3.2 0.18 0.00000000 493.0
0.5 14.3 14.6 1.87 36.4 17.3 3.0 5.78 7.8 1.84 2.02020198 492.5
1.0 14.6 14.6 2.02 36.4 17.6 3.0 5.85 7.9 1.85 0.23141508 492.0
2.0 14.6 14.6 2.13 36.3 17.6 3.0 5.86 7.9 1.86 0.09481671 491.0
A.O 14.6 14.6 2.25 36.3 17.6 3.0 5.86 7.9 1.86 0.04983166 _489.0_
8.0 14. 14.6 2.37 36.3 17.6 3.0 5.86 7.9 1 .86 0.02587109 485.0
16.0 14, 14.6 2.51 36.4 17.6 3.0 5.86 7.9 1.86 0.01483981 477.0
38.0 14, 14.6 2.70 36.4 17.6 3.0 5.86 7.9 1.85 0.00794586 455.0
69.0 14. 14.6 2.91 36.5 17.6 3.0 5.85 7.9 1.85 0.00595027 424.0
135.0 14. 14.6 3.21 36.6 17.5 3.0 5.84 7. 8 1 .85 0.00420942 358,0
205.0 14. 14.6 3.48 36.7 17.5 3.0 5.83 7.8 1.85 0.00392151 288.0
273.0 14 14.6 3.75 36.8 "TTTT 3.0 5.85" 7T8" 0.004T2-Tf9~ 220.0 "
347.0 14 14.6 4.08 36.9 17.5 3.0 5.84 7.8 I .85 0.00518646 146.0
407.0 14 14.6 4.43 37.0 17.5 3.0 5.84 7.8 1.85. 0.00932299 86.0
465.0 14 14.6 5.17 37.2 1-7.5 3.0 5.82 7.8 1.85 0.04260687 28.0
471.0 14 14.6 5.44 37.2 17.5 3.0 5.85 7.8 1.85 0.05989649 22.0
475.0 14.5 14.6 5.72 37.2 17.5 3.0 5.85 7.8 1.85 0.08410245 13.0
479.0 14.5 14.6 6. 12 37.3 17.5 3.0 5.84 7.8 1.85 0.12408945 14.0"
481.0 14.5 14.6 6.39 37.3 17.5 3.0 5.8 5 7.8 1.85 0.16095811 12.0
483.0 14.5 14.6 6.76 37.3 17.5 3.0 5.84 7.8 1.85 0.20926693 10.0
485.0 14.5 14.6 7.23 37.3 17.5 3.0 5.84 7.8 1.85 0.27257431 8.0
487.0 14.5 14.6 7.85 37.4 17.5 3.0 5.83 7.8 1.85 0.35221933 6.C
489.0. 14.5 14.6 8.64 37.4 17.5 3.0 5.82 7.8 1.85 0.49363349 4.0
491.0 14.4 14.5 9.83 37.4 17.4 3.0 5.80 7.8 1.85 '1.40054964 2.0-
492.5 14.0 14.0 12.83 37.5 17.0 3.0 5.68 7.7 1.83 7.49729664 0.5
493.0 13.3 13.3 17.50 37.5 16.3 3.0 5.43 7.4 1.79 0.00000000 ,0.0

CREEP RUPTURE FAILURE

You might also like