Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(2013) PowerPoint-ICT-1113 PDF
(2013) PowerPoint-ICT-1113 PDF
(2013) PowerPoint-ICT-1113 PDF
1
Breakdown of elective
2
Options offered
3
Popularity
4
Interesting Figures (1)
Paper Max Mark
1 92
2A 54
2B 49
2C 48
2D 55
5
Interesting Figures (2)
Selection of Prog Lang (2D)
Total %
Pascal 796 69.1
C 286 24.8
Visual Basic 45 3.9
Java 25 2.2
1,152 100
6
Performance – Compulsory Part
Average no. of MC items correct = 23
High correlation with Paper 2s and SBA
7
Performance – Elective Part
Equating – performance of candidates
(Elective Part) can be reflected on the
same scale (Equipercentile method )
Performance (Paper 1) of students in
2D > 2A > 2B > 2C
Refer to Grading Procedures & standards-referenced
Reporting in the HKDSE Exam (HKEAA)
8
Grading Procedures
Sample script selection
Standardisation
Post-marking exercise
Panel of judges grading meeting
Internal meeting
Public Exam Board meeting
Refer to Grading Procedures & standards-referenced
Reporting in the HKDSE Exam (HKEAA)
9
ICT (All candidates)
Level %
5** 0.7
5*+ 2.9
5+ 7.4
4+ 24.9
3+ 51.3
2+ 78.0
1+ 93.5
10
Levels attained
HKDSE Level 4 comparable to
HKAL Grade D
L5** Top 10% of L5
L5*+ Top 40% of L5 (L5* = next 30%)
11
SBA
No major irregularity cases
12
SBA – Reminders
Students have to
complete their reports on their own
acknowledge sources properly in their work
to avoid plagiarism
New measures: Prevention & handling
of Malpractice
13
2013 ICT Exemplars
Exemplars with annotated notes
P1B – 1 exemplar @ Level @ language
P2 – selected levels
Uploaded to www.hkeaa.edu.hk
14
Assessing Student Learning
for the ICT Curriculum
Student Performance : OK
WiFi network
• Student Performance :
Bluetooth
USB cable
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 1 ~ (b) (ii)
“functional characteristics”
Paper 1B – Qu 1 ~ (c)
Paper 1B – Qu 2 ~ (a)
Paper 1B – Qu 2 ~ (b)
•
Suggest two protocols for receiving email that
Janice may use POP3, IMAP
Paper 1B – Qu 2 ~ (c)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 2 ~ (c)
• Student Performance :
– OK, but some show no experience in it
• Reflection for T&L:
– More actual demo to student
Paper 1B – Qu 2 ~ (d) (ii)
• Student Performance :
– OK, but some of the answer are too simple (e.g.
convenience)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 3
– Charles: No, I will still keep the BT program and use it.
• Student Performance :
– Good, but some state features not related to
set-up, or not related to eye strain
• Reflection for T&L:
– Care about EVERY word in the question
Paper 1B – Qu 3 ~ (b)
• Student Performance :
– Good, but some mentioned the following only
• Number
• Character
• English character
• Reflection for T&L:
– State more related examples
Paper 1B – Qu 3 ~ (d) (i)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 3 ~ (d) (ii)
• Student Performance :
– Good, but some mentioned the following only
• Number
• Character
• English character
• Reflection for T&L:
– State more related examples
Paper 1B – Qu 3
• Student Performance :
– Good, especially in THEFT offences. But some
mentioned privacy instead of illegal access
• Student Performance :
– Good, except some only mentioned more
secure, which is not acceptable
• Student Performance :
– Good, except some not using question example for
answer reference
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 4 ~ (c)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, especially in Relative & Absolute Addressing
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 4 ~ (e)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 1B – Qu 5 ~ (a)
• Student Performance :
– Good, student understand need of
initialization, and some basic operation
Paper 1B – Qu 5 ~ (a)
• Student Performance :
– Not good, some student not good in explaining
‘change’
• Student Performance :
– OK, but some not good in subprogram / modularizing
the program
• Student Performance :
– Good
Briefing Session on
2013 HKDSE ICT Exam Paper 2A
Question 1
Question 1
Candidate Performance :
(a) Very Good. (b) Satisfactory. (c) Satisfactory.
Most candidates are able to manage simple SQL statements involving filtering,
ordering and grouping.
* Accept grouping field(s) is/are not the same as the field(s) in the select clause.
* Accept TRUE, ‘TRUE’, “TRUE” and .T. to represent boolean data type.
Question 1
Candidate Performance :
(d) Fair. (e) (i) Fair. (ii) Poor.
(d) Some candidates cannot handle this more complicated SQL statement. Some of
them cannot distinguish the usage of “where clause” and “having clause” and put
aggregate function in the “where clause”.
* Not Accept YEAR(…) = “2012” since the return of the function YEAR() is an integer.
(e)(i) Some candidates directly explain the working flow of this SQL statement, but
cannot show the background purpose of it.
*Accept “left outer join” and “left join” *Not accept … = NULL
Question 1
Candidate Performance :
(e) (iii) Poor.
Some candidates understand this question is asking for combining two SQL
statements, but they only know the word “UNION”.
Question 2
Candidate Performance :
(a) Fair.
Candidate Performance :
(b) Poor.
Candidate Performance :
(c) Satisfactory
Many candidates don’t know why SQL View can be used to protect the data privacy.
Question 2
Candidate Performance :
(d) Satisfactory
(i) Most candidates can explain the problem, but they don’t know the term
“referential integrity” and the concept related to foreign key.
Question 3
This is a very traditional question, but some candidates still don’t understand the
difference of usage between database and spreadsheet
Question 3
Some candidate are weak at data representation, e.g. use ‘888’ for an integer.
Candidate Performance :
(c) Satisfactory
Many candidates know this suggestion can reduce the required storage size, but not
many of them can answer the potential disadvantage with the concept of data
validation.
Question 3
Candidate Performance :
(d) Fair
Most candidates don’t know what should be done before data migration.
Question 4
Candidate Performance :
(a) Good.
Candidate Performance :
(b) Good
Candidate Performance :
(c) Satisfactory
Many candidates can answer both advantage and disadvantage of the combination.
Question 4
Question 4
Candidate Performance :
(d) Satisfactory
(i) Most candidates know that the system should not disclose the name of buyers.
(ii) Some candidates only concentrate on the “ordering” and don’t know the “provide
proper information” means to protect data privacy. MID should not be selected.
Question 4
Candidate Performance :
(e) Satisfactory
(f) Fair
Paper 2B – Qu 1
Paper 2B – Qu 1 (a)
• Student Performance :
– Good, except some wrote 埠 wrongly
• Student Performance :
– Poor, especially in VPN and DHCP. Some wrote their
definition but not benefit
• Student Performance :
– Good, knowing MAC is unique
Paper 2B – Qu 1 (d)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, most simply mentioned the benefit is
“automatics”
Paper 2B – Qu 1 (e)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 2
Paper 2B – Qu 2 (a)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 2 (b)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, cannot well describe
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 2 (d)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, cannot well describe
Paper 2B – Qu 3 (a)
– Problem encounter
– Relocation ?
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 3 (c)
• Student Performance :
– Good, except some wrote need budget to buy
Paper 2B – Qu 4 (a)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 4 (b)
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 4 (c)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, cannot well describe, and also not clear in
packet vs circuit switching
• Student Performance :
– Good
Paper 2B – Qu 4 (e)
• Student Performance :
– Poor, student not have good knowledge in PAN
• 容易發放更新版本 / 跨平台(附註解)
有效管理客戶或電影記錄 / 防止電影被下載
兼容很多常用視像放器。 / 毋須額外Codec。/
質量較佳(需要較少壓縮)
毋須Codec。
檔案較大。/不支援串流傳輸。
較短等候時間
節省時間
(硬件)圖形顯示卡的運算能力差。/
沒有足夠記憶體。
沒有更新、不夠好
(網絡)顧客電腦的網絡頻寬不足。/
伺服器因繁忙未及回應。/
網絡十分繁忙。
60 ×1024 × 1024 × 8 / 200 或 60 × 8 / 200
= 2516582.4 bit/s 或 2.4 Mbps (2.5Mbps)
MP4 / MKV / AVI (H264, AVCHD) / WMV / FLV / MOV
(, )
codec, FFmpeg, DivX, Xvid, x264, mpeg
每秒掃瞄行數 (高度 )
解像度、每秒掃瞄像素數目 / 幀數目、像素寬度
在逐行視像中,幀內所有行線逐行更新。
逐行更新
在交錯視像中,幀內所有行線隔行更新。
一個一個(層)改變
Q.2
是 否
是 是
否 否
這兩個瀏覽器對某些HTML 編碼的翻譯不同。/
這兩個瀏覽器於墊或邊界的設定不同。
網頁 / 關鍵字 / 標題 / 作者 / 版權 / 產生日期 / 字符
編碼 / 網頁更新 / 轉發 (, )
(附描述)
(其他可行用途)
5184 3456 24 位元
= 51 / 51.3 / 51.26 MB
Q.3 - 4
防止傀儡程式讀取這些文字。/
確保這項回應是由真人發出。/
防止註冊或輸入資料由軟件自動產生。
(防止點客攻擊/防止複製及貼上 )
它可由布拉耶 / 布萊葉閱讀器 / 讀屏軟件 讀取。
(盲人可使用替換文字 )
透過聲效讀出驗證碼內容。 (聲效驗證 )
(電腦 / 瀏覽器 )
向用戶名稱(或其他輸入欄)採用客戶端手稿程式(本機 /
JavaScript),(1) 以檢測其輸入是否空白 (+1)。
向用戶名稱(或其他輸入欄)採用伺服器端手稿程式(數據庫),
(1) 以檢驗客戶的真確性 / 使用者名稱與密碼是否有效(+1)。
缺點1:用戶可沒有正確輸入歌曲的代碼。(1)
方案1:當按下表單上的歌曲時將代碼自動加入。/在每一
行歌上加入一個「加入購物籃」按鈕。/在歌曲側加入一
個複選框。(+1)
(利用下拉式選單 )
缺點2:用戶所揀選的歌曲沒有顯示,他不能刪除或修改。
/用戶未能檢視所選購的歌曲。(1)
方案2:加入一個表格來展示所揀選的歌曲,並容許作任何
修改。(+1)
(加入一個重設/復原按鈕 )
只有歌曲名稱,不清楚由那個歌手唱
方案:加入一個數量欄。/ 加入一個歌手欄。/
加入試聽連結 )
在一秒內取出 44,100 個樣本。 (44.1 1024 )
每個樣本由16個位元數據組成。/ 每個樣本大小
為16個位元。
它可產生從四方收集的聲音,如自然發出的聲音,富
人性化。/
利用兩個聲道(左右兩邊)收錄聲音。
可播放出栩栩如生的歌曲。/錄播的歌曲接近真人現
場演唱。
(質量較佳/聲音佳/清晰地收錄聲音/有兩道聲道
)
相位 phase
振幅 Amplitude / 聲量 loudness / volume
(檔案類型/檔案格式/壓縮方法/時段/
長度 )
有一些活動的名稱冗長,它們可清楚地展示出來。/
寬度/顯示面積較細,適合於手提電話/流動裝置使用。
(2)
當有很多不同活動時,此項設計可固定所展示活動清單
的長度,以供選擇。/
所選擇的活動可清楚地展示。(2)
顯示一對話框來確認有關選擇。(1)
加入一個「取消勾選」/「重設」按鈕,(1)
取消所選擇的項目,讓用戶可簡單地重新選擇。/
減少重新載入此網頁的時間。(+1)
2013 HKDSE ICT-D
workshop
2013-11-22
2013-11-23
Q1
Q1
Q1
Q1
Q2
Q2
Q2
Q2
Q3
Q3
Q3
Q3
Q4
Q4
Q4
Q4