Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GEC 8 ABELON, DOROTHY ANNE (Activity 1)
GEC 8 ABELON, DOROTHY ANNE (Activity 1)
SHEET IN
ETHICS
Direction: Put the case for or against your view or idea by giving evidence for your
claims/reasons for or against; attempt to influence the reader to accept your view.
Part I.
Based on the definition, art is a way of expressing thoughts and ideas. So I think art should be
both aesthetic and thought-provoking at the same time. Most art has a hidden meaning,
especially when it comes to paintings, songs, and etc. Art will always be meaningful. However,
on the Mideo Cruz "Poleteismo" because we live in a Christian country and the majority of us
are Catholic. I think it is very disrespectful to use Jesus on exhibit, plus they also decorate him. It
is a big disrespect to God and Christianity. But since art is a way of conveying thoughts and
ideas, I think we should still think about the audience or viewers, especially if our subject is very
sensitive and off topic. So in short, we have a freedom of expression but still we have a
restrictions when it comes in expressing arts.
Part II.
A. Imagine a scenario in which an image of someone who is the object
of religious devotion (such as Jesus Christ or Mary, the Mother of Jesus)
is placed side by side with a phallic image?
To be honest, I am not religious, but I believe it is still wrong to have a phallic
symbol next to a holy figure. To be honest, regardless of your religious beliefs,
placing a holy monument next to a phallic symbol is quite disrespectful. So I
believe that rightness and wickedness are determined by your beliefs.
B. Look for another example of an artistic creation – a painting, poem, or song – that is a
source of either actual or potential conflict between the expression of the artist and
sensibility that finds this offensive. Present the significant details and the reasons that the
conflicting sides might have on this issue.
Menstrual Period in Political History by Danny Sillada
Danny C. Sillada: “Menstrual Period in Political History” is a mixed media on
metamorphic rock or slate, with painted and carved vaginal form at the center. The
visual narrative of the artwork is not vociferous with bleak background in contrast to the
vibrant colors of my typical paintings. However, I never expected that its inconspicuous
presence along with the title would become controversial in 2005. The parallelism of
“Politics” and “Menstrual Period” is, obviously, the cyclical political turmoil in our
country, which is periodic since the Marcos time up to the Arroyo regime. Like a
woman’s menstrual period, Philippines politics has its own menstrual cycle in our
country in the form of corruption, economic instability, violation of human rights, the
involuntary disappearances of civilians, the century-old war in Mindanao, insurgency,
poverty, and inadequacy of political leaders to address socio-economic and political
problems in our society, to name a few.
The conflict I saw in this painting was used as a symbol in our flag. Despite the fact that
our flag is quite valued in our country, the painter put together the vagina and colors of
our flag. This paint got viral because it became offensive. However, regardless of its
symbolism, this paint has a deep meaning. In aesthetics, symbolism is a vehicle for
revealing the Truth (good or bad) about the concrete state of a historical civilization or a
particular issue. The artist has little control over a work of art once it is displayed in a
public space, regardless of the viewers' perceptions or interpretations. Even if an artist
did not aim to make a mockery of any social or political issues with his or her work,
once it is shown to the public, it becomes a living emblem of social and cultural history.
Symbolism, in the context of aesthetics, thus has the potential to affect, influence, or
transform human perception on its own; it will either irritate or inspire viewers.
Although this painting used vagina as a symbol it possess the power to provoke the
consciousness of the viewers in the context of social and political realities of our
societies.
III. Look for and list down other sources wherein we find a dialogue
between ethics and the various domains of aesthetic, culture and religion.
Assessment Sheet
ASSESSMENT 1
Be fair. We can’t deny that at some point in our lives, we as people are not equal.
Especially when it comes to opportunities. For example, you are an interviewer and you
interview the son of your boss and your other applicant. But you hired your boss’s son
rather than that of an applicant who deserved more of a position in your company. Being
fair is really difficult to fulfill, especially right now. Most of us, especially those that
have titles and positions in government, are being greedy and unfair. For me, being fair
is ethical in nature and something we need to do to create an ideal and peaceful society.
Be kind. Being kind is ethical in nature. I believe that all people, even the bad ones, have
kindness in their hearts.
B.
Prohibited to share our privacy. For example, we are journalists or interviewers and we
badly want to get information about a certain person, and that person declines our offer. I
think as a professional and as a person, we should respect their decision. It is an
obligation as a person to not invade another’s privacy if they don’t want to.
C.
To create an ideal society, we should follow or do the basic ethical principles such as
being kind, being respectful, being fair, being honest and so on. If the people in our
society had this kind of etiquette, I think our society would be in peace.
2. Are clothes a matter of pure aesthetic taste, or does it make sense for
clothes to become a subject in a discussion of ethics? Why? How about other
forms of adornment, such as tattoos and piercings?
This topic is very relevant right now. A lot of people especially women are
being judge on way they dresses. Since I studied in other place before, I’ve
met a lot of different people that from different places. I have a classmates
that from Greece and she dress really different from most of us. She dress
too revealing. To be honest, I judge her before because of the way she
dresses. But I realized and when I heard her reason. I changed my mindset.
She told us that she migrated in Greece when she was in grade 6 she is very
innocent and she is fat before. Most of her classmates bullied her for being
fat and being Asian. That’s why she is become very conscious on her body
and style because she thinks she can gain confidence from it. So I think
beside from being aesthetic, I think being fashionable for some people is a
different matters. About tattoos and piercings, I think it would be the same.
It can be used for aesthetic and some other reasons.
3. Look for a newspaper article that tackles an ethical issue. Consider the
following questions:
https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/investigative/171457-incest-rape-
philippines-sexual-abuse/
- Rape is a crime that is extremely traumatic, and sadly, their rapists are family
members. Being raped by your uncle or father involves not only sexual violence
but also guilt. It is important in ethics because we are discussing what is right,
wrong, and moral. Consider the guilt they are feeling because they put their uncle
in jail. I believe that putting rapists behind bars is the right decision, regardless of
our relationship with them.
-It is very saddening to read this kind of article, and in my opinion, we should address this kind
of topic in school. So that if ever someone is experiencing this kind of act, she or he can have an
idea of how she will deal with her problems. Regarding my judgment, I believe all rapists should
be put in jail regardless of our relationship with them, regardless of their social status, etc. A
rapist is a rapist, period.
5. Imagine that you are a legislator. What rules or laws that currently
prohibit certain acts or practices would you want to amend or repel? Also, are
there certain acts or practices currently permitted by the law that you would
want to prohibit? Think of this on the level of your school, your province and
the nation.
- I don’t know if it’s just me, but I think almost all of my suspicions are coming true. But of
course it doesn't apply to everything; maybe it just depends on the situation. As for this saying, I
feel that even though we have a strong feeling that we are right, we still need to do a fact check
to avoid embarrassment and mistakes. Because it's also hard to just believe in your gut and not
on real information.
7. Is looking after the benefit of your own family over all other aspects
considered as another form of egoism? Discuss.
- Yes, it is but only if the word “only" or “alone" is added like this: “Is looking after the benefits
of your family alone considered a form of egoism?”.
People mistakenly tend to believe that doing one good thing annuls or cancel other good things,
it is not the case. For example, if you have compassion towards animals and defend them against
cruelty or abuse, this does not cancel your compassion towards elders or children.
Direction: Put the case for or against your view or idea by giving evidence for your
claims/reasons for or against; attempt to influence the reader to accept your view
In view of Bentham and Mill‘s assertion of the greatest happiness of the greatest
number, do you think that animal rights and welfare should even be a concern in the
Philippines where millions of people below the poverty threshold are struggling to
have decent lives? Is the concern for animal rights and welfare a first world problem?
ASSESSMENT 2
Direction: Put the case for or against your view or idea by giving evidence for your
claims/reasons for or against; attempt to influence the reader to accept your view
I think it is wrong to torture suspects. We have a saying that is innocent until proven, so
to me it is wrong to make them punching bags inside the jail. Also, the justice system
here in the Philippines is very slow. That’s why it is unfortunate that the suspects who are
really innocent will be tortured.
Activity Sheet
ACTIVITY 3
Direction: Put the case for or against your view or idea by giving evidence for your
claims/reasons for or against; attempt to influence the reader to accept your view
Post truth
This is very relevant right now, since we lived in the modern world wherein conveying
information is very easy. Most of us, when we watched something from tiktok or youtube
we always thought that It is right. Often when we watch videos on the internet we think
they are true, we think everything we read is true. Maybe that's the disadvantage of social
media, it makes the spread of fake news faster than the truth. Many of our compatriots
believe in spliced video and fake news on social media. For example, Vice President Leni
Robredo is always called "Lutang" and "bobo" because of the cut videos they watch on
youtube and facebook. They are so quick to judge the person without looking at her
credentials. Fake news is quickly devouring people today so they often make wrong
decisions and wrong judgments on people.
Direction: Put the case for or against your view or idea by giving evidence for your
claims/reasons for or against; attempt to influence the reader to accept your view
1. Are there other ways that the word natural is used to justify a particular way of
behaving? How do these approaches compare to the theory of Aquinas?
Natural, is often used to describe a beings actions or behaviors per societal standards, and
if they conform to the common understanding of what should be and how they should be
done, allows for the determination of whether these things are normal or abnormal and
whether or not are lawful or evil. Natural law should not justify your immorality, in my
opinion. For example, you yelled at someone and humiliated them because you are in the
bad mood. In natural law, that kind of act is unavoidable. However, some people might
misunderstand you because of that attitude. In comparison with Aquinas’ understanding,
consider that Aquinas is not limiting the scope, application and source of natural law to
perception.
2. Can you think of human laws that are proper extensions of the natural law?
Explain how this is so. Can you think of other human law that violates the
natural law? Explain how this is so.
First of all, when we say human law, it is a law with moral content, more general than
human law. It refers to all instances wherein human beings construct and enforce laws in
communities. Roman Catholic laws are based on natural law, wherein abortion and same-
sex marriage are prohibited. These natural laws are the extension of human law here in
the Philippines. The Philippines has outlawed abortion and same-sex marriage, which
may be due to our Christian heritage.Supreme court stated that states and churches are
separate, we still can’t deny that somehow they are united.
3. Are there other forms of harm – short of killing another person – that may be
taken as a violation of the natural inclination to preserve one‘s being? Justify
your answer.
• Technically, any negative action committed against another individual would be a
violation of nature's natural propensity to 'support each other' in order to ensure the
survival of a social group or species. The majority of our actions against others go
against their natural inclination. Just one example of someone who is straightforward.
Even though it is not our intention, they can be hurt when we say something that is
true. Being frank is natural, but it causes other people pain.