Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease - American College of Cardiology
Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease - American College of Cardiology
Dapagliflozin and Prevention of Adverse Outcomes in Chronic Kidney Disease - American College of Cardiology
Study Design
Highlighted text has been updated as of December 20, 2022. Other salient features/characteristics:
The DAPA-CKD trial showed that dapagliflozin results in salutary effects on renal Mean blood pressure: 138/78 mm Hg
function and mortality among patients with CKD, irrespective of DM status. Mean eGFR: 43 ml/min/1.73 m2; eGFR <30: 14%, 30-<45: 44%, 45-<60: 31%
Urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio >1000: 48%
Description:
Principal Findings:
The goal of the trial was to assess the safety and efficacy of dapagliflozin in
reducing renal events among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or
The trial stopped early due to benefit. The primary endpoint, decline in eGFR The results of this trial indicate that dapagliflozin results in salutary effects on
≥50%, end-stage kidney disease, death from renal causes, or cardiovascular (CV) renal function among patients with CKD, with or without DM, who are already on
death for dapagliflozin vs. placebo, was 9.2% vs. 14.5% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.61, maximal tolerated doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin-
95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51-0.72; p = 0.000000028). The benefit of receptor blocker. There were also beneficial effects noted on non-CV and all-cause
dapagliflozin on the primary endpoint was consistent in patients with and without mortality and all-cause hospitalizations. Results were sustained among patients
type 2 DM. with or without known CV disease or HF at baseline.
Decline in eGFR ≥50%: 5.2% vs. 9.3% Even though the sodium–glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors were
End-stage kidney disease: 5.1% vs. 7.5% introduced as type 2 DM management drugs, results of DAPA-CKD and similar
CV death: 3.0% vs. 3.7% (p > 0.05) studies indicated a clear benefit in CKD management. This trial enrolled a
dedicated CKD population, and conclusively shows a benefit in this patient
Secondary outcomes for dapagliflozin vs. placebo: population, irrespective of DM status. These drugs will likely change practice and
CV death/HF hospitalization: 4.6% vs. 6.4% (p = 0.0009) have a prominent role in future CKD management guidelines. The CREDENCE trial
showed a similar benefit in CKD patients with type 2 DM; this trial extends the
All-cause mortality: 4.7% vs. 6.8% (p = 0.003)
Amputation: 1.6% vs. 1.8% (p = 0.73) benefit to patients without DM and with lower GFR. Similar results have been
reported for heart failure reduction among patients with heart failure and
Major hypoglycemia: 0.7% vs. 1.3% (p = 0.04)
reduced ejection fraction with these drugs, independent of DM status.
Presence of CV disease: Results for primary endpoint, CV disease/HF, all-cause References:
mortality and other CV outcomes for dapagliflozin vs. placebo were maintained Schechter M, Jongs N, Chertow GM, et al. Effects of Dapagliflozin on
among patients with and without known CV disease at baseline (p for interaction > Hospitalizations in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Post Hoc Analysis of
0.05 for all); event rates were higher among patients with known CV disease. DAPA-CKD. Ann Intern Med 2023;176:59-66.
Cause-specific mortality: 36.8% due to CV causes, 41.3% due to non-CV causes, McMurray JJ, Wheeler DC, Stefánsson BV, et al., on behalf of the DAPA-CKD Trial
remainder undetermined. For dapagliflozin vs. placebo, CV death: 1.9% vs. 2.3% (p Committees and Investigators. Effects of Dapagliflozin in Patients With Kidney
= 0.34); non-CV death: 1.7% vs. 3.1% (p = 0.003). Disease, With and Without Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail 2021;9:807-20.
Serious infections: 9.0% vs. 9.6% (p = 0.49); mortality in this subgroup for Poster presented by Dr. John J.V. McMurray at the European Society of Cardiology
dapagliflozin vs. placebo: 7.8% vs. 15.0% (p < 0.05) Virtual Congress, August 23, 2021.
Malignancy: 2.7% vs. 3.3% (p = 0.29); mortality in this subgroup: 15.3% vs.
23.9% (p > 0.05) Heerspink HJ, Sjöström CD, Jongs N, et al. Effects of Dapagliflozin on Mortality in
Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pre-specified Analysis From the DAPA-CKD
Presence of heart failure (HF) (n = 468): Dapagliflozin reduced the risk of the Randomized Controlled Trial. Eur Heart J 2021;42:1216-27.
primary endpoint equally in patients with HF (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.37-0.91) and
without HF (HR 0.62, 95% CI 0.51-0.75) (p for interaction = 0.59). Similar results Editorial Comment: Marx N, Floege J. Dapagliflozin, Advanced Chronic Kidney
were noted for HF/CV hospitalization, all-cause mortality, and HF hospitalization (p Disease, and Mortality: New Insights From the DAPA-CKD Trial. Eur Heart J
for interaction > 0.05). Event rates were higher among patients with HF. 2021;42:1228-30.
Effect on hospitalizations: First hospitalization for any cause for dapagliflozin vs. McMurray JJ, Wheeler DC, Stefánsson BV, et al., on behalf of the DAPA-CKD Trial
placebo: HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.75-0.94; first hospitalization or death: HR 0.83, 95% CI Committees and Investigators. Effect of Dapagliflozin on Clinical Outcomes in
0.75-0.93; all hospitalizations or death: rate ratio 0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.89. There was Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease, With and Without Cardiovascular Disease.
no interaction by diabetes status. Circulation 2021;143:438-48.
Interpretation: