Naka Kondo

Tokyo ● Mon, November 1, 2021

From food packaging to smartphones, home insulation to electric vehicles, plastic is an

essential material for everyday life. However, plastic pollution especially in our freshwater
system and the oceans has sparked a public backlash as rapid production of disposable
plastic products overwhelms the world’s ability to deal with them.

Images of fish, dolphins or seahorses entangled in plastic waste make for arresting visuals
but it’s the ingestion of plastic by fish, mammals and humans that poses the more severe
threat. Microplastics, tiny particles of less than five millimeters that break off from clothing,
car tires, or personal care items, to name a few, are ending up in our food, water and air,
causing harm to metabolic health and immunity and even increasing cancer risk.

While recognizing that we are dealing with a plastics crisis is a critical first step, tackling this
issue is in fact a lot harder. The very qualities that make plastic ubiquitous – low cost,
lightness, malleability – have deeply entrenched a throw-away culture with single use
plastics accounting for at least 40 percent of plastics produced every year. Due to its low
cost, people are not invested in reusing and recycling the plastic products and because of
their properties, they do not biodegrade as well.

Popularly touted solutions often fall short. Recycling cannot significantly tackle the problem,
partly because current technology can only process a narrow range of simple plastic
products, partly because the industry has poor governance, with many cases of plastic
recycling simply sent to incinerators or landfills.

On the other extreme, calls for “zero plastic” are unrealistic. Few materials compete with
plastics in terms of breadth of application and some suggested alternative materials, like
cardboard or glass, are far from environmentally friendly. Data suggests the entire lifecycle
emissions of alternatives like glass and paper are higher.

What is needed is a holistic approach to material design and production through to disposal
and reuse, with industry and government working together. This will require strong
regulations to phase out harmful practices, as well as moves that encourage innovation and
R&D into next-generation materials. To get there, we need to know how countries currently
perform, and where the key obstacles lie.

Economist Impact, part of The Economist Group, has worked with the Nippon Foundation to
produce the landmark 2021 Plastic Management Index (PMI), ranking 25 countries across a
series of indicators from policy and regulation to business and consumer practices and
attitudes. The initiative, part of the Back to Blue collaboration between our two
organizations,
present a worrying picture – while also pointing to useful strategies and actions taken by the
leading nations.

The PMI’s most concerning finding is that lower-middle income countries are struggling the
most to manage plastics, and Asian nations are clustered in the middle of the index in terms
of performance. This is a concern because of how much of the global plastics industry is
centered in these nations – and this is set to grow in the future as they develop their
economies. Over half of the plastic waste leaked in the world’s oceans originates from five
countries, all in Asia (China, Indonesia, the Philippines, Thailand and Vietnam). Our index
found that the Middle East and Africa are struggling the most. Nigeria, Africa’s most
populous nation, ranks bottom in three out of the four categories we measured.

But there is also cause for cautious optimism, as the index provides two useful insights. The
first is revealing the countries that are leading the world and the reasons for their strong
performance. Number-one ranked Germany, for instance, has achieved pole position thanks
to a range of factors that include a consultative approach that works with businesses in the
design of policies and programs, such as its successful recycling scheme, and strong national
commitment evidenced through its efforts to put marine litter on the Group of 20 (G20) and
G7 agendas.

But the PMI also shows that country performance is not strictly correlated to income level,
gross domestic product or industrial competitiveness. Vietnam, a lower middle-income
country, outperforms every upper-middle income country except China in our ranking.
Malaysia ranks top globally for responsible consumer actions and perceptions. Kenya beats
Germany in an index category which assesses private sector commitment to responsible
plastics use.

The United States, the richest country and largest economy in the index, only ranks fifth
overall. Intention and the will to act – by governments, industry and consumers – matters
more than how wealthy or developed an economy is.

The PMI’s goal is not to name and shame - instead, it provides the first rigorous benchmark
of how well countries around the world are managing plastics, an essential commodity for
modern life. This can help governments across the globe reliably assess their strengths and
weaknesses, identify exemplar nations who they can learn from and, as the index renews in
future years, track performance with the long-term objective of driving meaningful policy
action and outcomes.

*** The writer is manager for policy and insights at Economist Impact, a think-tank within
The Economist Group. These views are personal.

Source: https://www.thejakartapost.com/academia/2021/10/31/whos-leading-the-way-in-
fixing-the-plastics-crisis.html.
 TASK 2
REVIEWING PARAGRAPH STRUCTURE

Paragraph 1
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 2
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 3
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 4
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 5
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 6
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 7
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 8
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.

Paragraph 9
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.
Paragraph 10
Topic Sentence :
Supporting Ideas : 1.
2.