Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Epic Games Tech. Strategy
Epic Games Tech. Strategy
Epic Games Tech. Strategy
Question
As Tim Sweeney at Epic Games, would you pursue the lawsuit against Apple (and Google)?
Pros:
Installed base of 350 million Fortnite users which can lead in maximize indirect Network
Effect
Coalition with Spotify, Match group and 10 other companies
Support from Facebook
Paved a way for complementor to fight against monopolistic giants to dilute the anti-
competitive spirit created by them.
Opened new doors for legal policies for small companies to provide them a fair chance in this
market space
Helps Epic games to maintain a fair brand image
Antitrust law led to the launch of its own payment gateway and tried to lock in customers by
giving a discount of 20% if they downloaded from their own payment gateway
Created a space for gaming companies to enter and bring the competitive spirit back
Apple lost 60% of its active user since Fortnite’s removal
Cons:
Similar law suits earlier being sent to lower courts for further investigation
Diluted the revenue generation as major chunk comes from mobile phone games
Loss of existing customer base of Apple and Google
Wrong strategy: Marketing campaign to bring down Apple
Reduced arm twisting bargaining power for supplier of monopolistic giants
Apple and Google removed Fortnite from their stores
Epic’s developer account officially terminated from the App store
The lawsuit was although not in favor of Epic games but it started a revolution to break the anti-
competitive and antitrust laws of the big giants in the industry.
This case has highlighted the concept of Coopetition which focusses on cooperating with one
another which includes the buyer, supplier, competitors and complementor (Value net) in
analyzing and maximizing the size of the pie.