Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JI X HDL PESQUISA BIBLIOGRAFICA
JI X HDL PESQUISA BIBLIOGRAFICA
Abstract
DOI: 10.1016/j.numecd.2018.03.009
Abstract
Methods & results: In total 112 participants (men [50%] and women [50%])
aged 21-70 years with BMI 30-45 kg/m2 (mean 35.2 [SD 3.7]) were randomized
to intermittent or continuous energy restriction. A 6-month weight-loss phase
including 10 visits with dieticians was followed by a 6-month maintenance
phase without additional face-to-face counselling. The intermittent energy
restriction group was advised to consume 400/600 kcal (female/male) on two
non-consecutive days. Based on dietary records both groups reduced energy
intake by ∼26-28%. Weight loss was similar among participants in the
intermittent and continuous energy restriction groups (8.0 kg [SD 6.5] versus 9.0
kg [SD 7.1]; p = 0.6). There were favorable improvements in waist
circumference, blood pressure, triglycerides and HDL-cholesterol with no
difference between groups. Weight regain was minimal and similar between the
intermittent and continuous energy restriction groups (1.1 kg [SD 3.8] versus 0.4
kg [SD 4.0]; p = 0.6). Intermittent restriction participants reported higher hunger
scores than continuous restriction participants on a subjective numeric rating
scale (4.7 [SD 2.2] vs 3.6 [SD 2.2]; p = 0.002).
Trial registration: www.clinicaltrials.govNCT02480504.
2
doi: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00090. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00090
Abstract
doi: 10.1186/s12876-019-1132-8.
DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1132-8
Abstract
DOI: 10.1016/j.ctim.2019.08.021
Abstract
Results: 69, out of 70, participants completed the study and were included in
the final analysis. The results showed that, compared with calorie restriction,
following the modified alternate-day fasting diet significantly reduced body
weight (P = 0.003), waist circumference (P = 0.026), systolic blood pressure (P
= 0.029) and fasting plasma glucose (P = 0.009). However, no significant
difference was observed between the 2 groups in triglyceride (P = 0.614), total
cholesterol (P = 0.759), LDL-C (P = 0.289), HDL-C (P = 0.909), diastolic blood
pressure (P = 0.262), HOMA- IR (P = 0.425) and fasting insulin concentrations
(P = 0.496). In addition, the participants did not report any complaint due to
difficulties with diet adherence when following calorie restriction or modified
alternate-day fasting diet.
Conclusions: the present study suggests that modified alternate-day fasting
diet may be a more effective option in managing body weight, waist
circumference, systolic blood pressure, and fasting plasma glucose, compared
with common calorie restriction. Further studies are needed to confirm the
veracity of our results.
0 artigos Mulheres
1 artigos ambos os sexos
RESUMO
Background: Sub-optimal HDL is a prognostic marker of cardiovascular
disease. South Asia has a high prevalence of sub-optimal HDL compared to
other parts of the world. Intermittent fasting (IF) is a type of energy restriction
which may improve serum HDL and other lipids thereby reducing the risk of
cardiovascular diseases. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the
effect of IF on lipid profile and HDL-cholesterol in a sample of South Asian
adults. Methods: A 6-week quasi-experimental (non-randomized) clinical trial
was conducted on participants with low HDL (< 40 mg/dl for men and < 50
mg/dl for women). Participants of the control group were recommended not to
change their diet. The intervention group was recommended to fast for ~12 h
during day time, three times per week for 6 weeks. Pulse rate, blood pressure,
body weight, waist circumference, serum lipid profile, and blood glucose levels
were measured at baseline and after 6 weeks. Result: A total of 40 participants
were enrolled in the study (N = 20 in each group), while 35 (20 control and 15
intervention) completed the trial and were included in data analysis of the study.
Body measurements, including body weight, BMI and waist circumference,
showed significant interaction effects (p's < 0.001), indicating that there were
larger reductions in the IF group than in the control group. Significant interaction
effects were also observed for total (p = 0.033), HDL (p = 0.0001), and LDL
cholesterol (p = 0.010) with larger improvements in the IF group. Conclusion:
This study suggests that intermittent fasting may protect cardiovascular health
by improving the lipid profile and raising the sub-optimal HDL. Intermittent
fasting may be adopted as a lifestyle intervention for the prevention,
management and treatment of cardiovascular disorders. Clinical Trial
Registration: NCT03805776, registered on January 16, 2019,
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Lifestyle is a fundamental role in the risk of cardiovascular diseases and chronic diseases.
Objective: To evaluate the effect of the 16/8 intermittent fasting scheme against anthropometric
measurements, lipid prole values, blood pressure and cardiovascular risk. Method: Longitudinal
analytical study with intervention. Fifteen patients treated in the nutrition area in a private center between
January and October 2020 submitted to the 16/8 intermittent fasting scheme for four months, seeking to
reduce anthropometric measurements, lipid prole, blood pressure and / or cardiovascular risk. Variables:
body weight, body mass index (BMI), waist-hip index (WHI), abdominal circumference, lipid prole,
cardiovascular risk according to Framingham (Framingham AMR B table), total cholesterol / HDL and
LDL / HDL indices. Results: The average age was 47.1 years, the average height was 1.66 m., The
average body weight was 84.3 Kg., The average of the BMI was 30.46, the average of the WHI was 0.94,
the average of the abdominal circumference was 99.87, the mean total cholesterol, HDL and LDL were
240.06, 43.73 and 153.2 respectively, the mean cardiovascular risk according to Framingham was 0.11%
and the mean total cholesterol / HDL and LDL / HDL indices were 5.88 and 3.69. The evaluation of
averages before and after found signicant differences (p <0.05) at 3 and 4 months of evaluation.
Conclusions: The intermittent fasting scheme showed a signicant reduction in anthropometric
measurements, lipid prole and cardiovascular risk. Additionally, an increase in HDL was observed.