Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title Question Revised
Title Question Revised
Title Question Revised
SKILLS OF STUDENTS
A Thesis Proposal
Presented to the Faculty of the
College of Criminal Justice Education
Naga College Foundation
Naga City
In Partial Fulfillment
Of the Requirements of the Degree
Of Bachelor of Science in Criminology
2022
ii
APPROVAL SHEET
Thesis Committee
PANEL OF EXAMINERS
Approved by the committee on Oral Examination on_________________
with a grade of ____________%
I have checked said manuscript and I, therefore, certify that they have
Noted:
CERTIFICATION
CERTIFICATION
Issued upon request of the interested party for reference purposes and
Philippines.
_______________________
Editor
Noted:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
the following persons who give their time, effort, support, and prayers. Without
of Naga College Foundation, for her time, advice, and recommendations to the
researchers.
To Dr. Arnold F. Abiog our thesis adviser who give his time, effort and
To our Respondents, for their participation to give their opinion and ideas
To our Family and friends, who is always giving us the support financially
and emotionally.
And above all, to God almighty, for the knowledge and strength that is
one of the reasons to make our research successful. To God be the Glory.
The Researchers
vii
ABSTRACT
Title: "EFFECT OF EXTRA-CURRICULAR ACTIVITIES IN
ENHANCING SOCIAL SKILLS OF STUDENTS
The purpose of this research is to help the future researchers about their
What is the demographic profile of the respondents in terms of: age, sex,
curricular activities on enhancing their social skills? 4 What are the advantages
viii
respondents? Several theories have been using in the chapter 2 that provide
effectiveness and success of this study. The researchers found out that
Students and ranked 6th that they agreed with was the indicator weekend
the indicator ranked 1st was obtained through the highest responses from
Mandated and Non-Mandated officers with the 3.90 mean rating, followed by the
ranked 1st as agreed by the Mandated and Non-Mandated officers as well as the
Varsity Students and ranked 5th that they agreed with was the indicator
ix
Furthermore, the indicator ranked 1st was obtained through the highest
responses from Varsity with the 3.89 mean rating, followed by the Mandated and
Non-Mandated officers 3.72 mean rating. The average weighted mean was 3.81.
In contrast, the indicator that ranked last to agree upon was Stress
obtained from the highest response from the Mandated and Non- Mandated
officers with the mean rating of 2.86 while 2.51 mean rating for Varsity. The
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEDGMENT ……………………………………………………………………. vi
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Assumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
5
xi
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Theoretical Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29
Conceptual Framework . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
Methods Used . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
Procedure of Investigation. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Statistical Tools. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42
xii
Notes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 54
Project proposal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55
PROBLEM 1
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
PROBLEM 2
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Recommendation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
PROBLEM 3
xiii
Findings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Conclusions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
PROBLEM 4
Recommendations. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 62
APPENDICES
a. BIBLIOGRAPHY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
b. Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
c. Appendix B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70
d. Appendix C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
e. CURRICULUM VITAE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 76
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
Table 3. Socio-Demographic