Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SWPIreviewer
SWPIreviewer
Western Beginnings
The use of social casework as a method of social work intervention was first
introduced in the Philippines by the early Americans who came into the country.
Historically the Americans were responsible for its development as a social work
method, first as charity workers, later as friendly visitors, and last as social workers.
However, its evolution may be traced for back to some of the early performers of
Christian Charities. One was a Spanish philosopher and the other, a Scottish
protestant minister.
Individualization
The idea of helping the poor on an individual basis was first brought up by a
Spanish philosopher, Juan Luis de Vives, who lived in Belgium during the sixteenth
century. He was witness to the indiscriminate distribution of alms by the pious rich
as well as the religious orders with nary a second though or concern for the well-
being of each individual poor. He therefore advanced that the fate of the individual
poor deserved attention, that the donors or alms givers should be concerned with
what happened afterwards to each and every recipient. In those days, all over
Europe, they were called “paupers”, a term that signified way of life dependent on
relief. He advocated that an investigation of the social conditions of every pauper
family should be conducted to determine specific need and/or problems. He
recommended that besides the distribution of alms, vocational training, employment
and other rehabilitative services should be provided.
However, Spain at that time was at the seat of counter reformation so his
recommendations seems to have been totally ignored. Charitable acts then were still
“steeped” in the old traditions and interpretations of Christian teaching.
It was not until the 19 th century that a similar idea would surface, this time in
Scotland. The philosophy of personal, parochial relief was introduced by Thomas
Chalmers (178-1847) a Scottish parish minister. He began by initiating in his parish,
a program of private charity based on neighboring aid. He advocated that each case
of destitution should be handled on individual basis. Instead of simply doling out
relief or alms, each case should be investigated so as to determine the cause of
distress. Only then should a solution to the problem be attempted. Among others,
he stressed that a personal interest in the fate of the individual was necessary to
ensure the rehabilitation and/or upliftment of the individual poor.
Individualized Approach
Fifty years after Chalmer’s pioneering work in Scotland, his idea was picked up
by the charity workers of England. They incorporated the two ideas, individualization
and personal neighboring aid in the approach that they used in dealing with the
poor. The London Charity Organization Societies was organized in 1869 to operate a
program of relief based on Chalmer’s idea thus laying the groundwork for casework
as a method in helping the poor. They established the policy that help would be
extended on a case to case basis depending on each individual circumstances. Soon
a number of Charity Organization Societies sprouted in England.
The COS encouraged the growth of private charities, and the giving of donations
and bequests on their behalf. Volunteers were recruited to bring aid to the poor
families and they were encouraged to be resourceful. These volunteers were well-
to-do. It was assumed that they led a very moral and successful lives and
themselves could convey these ideas to their clients and serve as models as well for
the poor to emulate.
Unlike today’s modern concept which recognize that poverty may be due to
poor environment and/or to deficiencies to the socio-economic and political systems,
the charity organization society workers of the nineteenth century believed that the
individual was mainly responsible for his condition. Therefore poverty was a sure
sign of weal moral character. Nonetheless the charity workers were also concerned
about the fact that the acceptance of relief could destroy the self-respect of the
pauper and make him perpetually dependent on alms. The volunteers were directed
to see to it that the pauper exerted all his abilities in maintaining himself.
In addition the volunteers were directed to exert moral influence on the pauper
in such way that he would change his attitudes and behaviors. In the main this was
due to the fact already stated that they believed that poverty was due to personal
failure or lack of firm moral character on the part of the individual, hence he must
be counseled to change for the better. Later this would be conceptualized by social
workers as one of the objectives of casework, to change the client’s attitude and
behavior in a given situation.
The COS was quite popular in England and it is credited with several
achievements. Among these are the introduction of the friendly visitors who
conducted the investigation of each poor individual or family thus laying the
groundwork for casework. It also achieved the coordination of services among
different relief organizations, of poor relief and private charities thus paving the way
for community organization as a social work method. It also claims to have
The friendly visitor became the American forerunner of the caseworker. He/she
visited individuals and families applying for assistance to determine whether or not
there was a need for relief. Only upon actual verification was relief given. A
significant effort was made to consider need from the point of view of the sufferer.
The friendly visitor emphasized friendship, not alms. Since then friendship has
evolved into a more professional approach. It is now referred to as client-worker or
helping relationship. It is based on mutual trust and rapport.
Family-Centered Casework
Although the concept of relief had changed from impersonal relief giving to the
individualized approach it was in no way individualized in the strictest sense of the
word. The individual usually was a member of a family and they were included in
the approach. This development took place in the early 1800s.
The avowed aim of COS was to foster self-reliance among the poor.
Consequently the friendly visitors directed their efforts to educating the family
members, and introducing activities that would result in more self-help.
COS Contributions
By the first two decades of this, the 20 th century social casework as a social
work method of intervention would emerge clearly, with the COS playing a major
role in its development. Specifically the organization would be credited with three
major contributions:
1. Its emphasis on thorough investigation of each case held the groundwork for
the social case study function;
2. It gave rise to the family agency which became the traditional home for
casework; and
3. It gathered the first professional training for caseworkers, and therefore, for
social workers.
Mary Richmond was executive head of a large family agency for many years in
the United States. In 1911 she joined the Russel Sage Foundation. All the while she
was taking notes on the development and practice of casework for 15 years. Her
book “Social Diagnosis” appeared in 1917. It was an attempt to draw together basic
knowledge of casework up to that time.
Richmond then defined social casework as consisting of three steps: the
gathering of social evidence, social diagnosis, and treatment. This is sometimes
referred to as the casework trilogy.
Richmond while still connected with the family agency also pioneered in social
work education. In 1897 she formulated a plan for a school; in 1898 this school
materialized into the Training School for Applied Philanthropy and was set up in
New York. It became the prototype of school of social work.
Introduction
Casework, a scientific method used in dealing with needy individuals and their
families was introduced into the Philippine setting around the 1920s. this
achievement is attributed to Josefa Jara Martinez, a pioneering social worker. In
1921 she obtained a diploma in social work from the New York School of Social
Work. Upon her arrival in the Philippines she was hired as the first Filipino Executive
An unpublished social work thesis recounts that the first social services unit
was organized at the Philippine General Hospital in 1915. The workers of the service
were to have been assigned to conduct social services work in the hospital.
The same study also cited the establishment of psychiatric social work
practice in 1923 at the National Psychiatric Hospital (now known as the National
Mental Hospital). The workers were assigned to gather statistical information about
the families of the patients admitted to the hospital for the use of the doctors.
In 1949 a medical social service was created in San Lazaro Hospital. It was
patterned after the Almoner Service in England. This event gave further impetus to
the practice of social work in a medical setting. The workers started to display a
more sophisticated approach to the problems of the patient and his family. The
process focused on the social and emotional components of the illness of the
patient, in relation to himself, his family, and community.
However, what may be considered as a major breakthrough in social work
practice in the medical setting was the passage of Republic Act No. 747 in 1962. The
law provided that eligibility for medical assistance would be based on the
fluctuations in the standard of living. Simultaneously, a medical social worker of the
Department of Health was sent to the United States for training in medical social
work. In pursuance of the law, the Department issued a circular in 1964 which
among other things provided for the establishment of a plantilla item.
Casework Literature
In the past immediate year there have been numerous conferences, seminars
and workshops held by practitioners and educators in an effort to make social work
practice as well as casework, group work, and community organization methods
more relevant and effective to the current and emerging Philippine situations, and to
national goals and aspirations. The Ministry of Social Services and Development has
just recently (1991) embarked on a reexamination of the concept of total family
approach.
Definitios
Kazuko Kay on the other hand defines casework as “a method of social work
which intervenes in the psycho-social aspects of a person’s life to restore, improve,
and develop his social functioning or prevent its malfunction by enhancing his role
performance as a constructive and productive individual. It is a problem-solving as
well as a helping process”.
These three definitions are more or less agreed on the following concepts:
that social casework is a social work method used in working with individuals, who
have problems in social functioning; that it is a helping as well as problem-solving
process; that the goal is to improve the individual’s role performance; and that it is
attended by a variety of social work activities that may include the giving of material
assistance as well as emotional and psychological support. These are the basic