Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
Logical Fallacies
1. Bandwagon; this one is important in our own discussions because you shouldn’t be lazy a
follow the whole group do your research and find why something should be true.
2. Straw man; this is another issue we come across in many of the discussions, they do this to
take away the argument that the other has.
3. Either-or; when we have an discussion this person says something like ‘’do you like this or
don’t like this’’ and it really doesn’t give any space to react differently on the subject of
matter.
4. Texas sharpshooter; you should not only look for similarities, when you have a discussion you
should find points you guys disagree on and then you should talk about hem.
5. Appeal to false authority; this one was one of the favorites because some people use
references that are not scholars in the subject.
6. Personal attack; some of us had experienced it before, when someone has nothing to say
about the discussion because they know that they where wrong, they try to attack you
personally to get that anger out of you. Because that is way easier than talking about stuff
7. Burden of proof; Never try and find the answers for the ‘opponent’ they came up with the
argument so they have to know what backs that up.
8. Appeal to force: is another one that we come across sometimes, using intimidation to force
something on someone happens a lot.
9. Circular argument; something is already perceived right when it still has to be proven. If a
then b, if b then a.
10. Argumentum at nauseam; the last one happens a lot of times too. When you read something
a lot of times you start to believe it yourself.
‘’Tu Quoque - In discussions it will happen that someone distracts from the argument by pointing out hypocrisy in
the opponent.’’
‘’Straw Man: Oversimplyfing someones argument to make it easier to debunk the opponents argument’’