Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1of 11

international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

ScienceDirect

journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/he

Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and


electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors

Xinhe Qu a,b, Gang Zhao a,b,*, Jie Wang a,b


a
Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology Cooperation Innovation
Center, Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University,
Beijing, 100084, China
b
Tsinghua University-Zhang Jiagang Joint Institute for Hydrogen Energy and Lithium-Ion Battery Technology,
Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China

highlights

 Two hydrogen and electricity cogeneration schemes coupled with VHTRs were proposed.
 Energy and exergy analysis were conducted on the hydrogen and electricity cogeneration systems.
 The component with the highest exergy loss coefficient is SGs with values 12.9% and 14.7%.
The overall efficiency are 43.6% and 39.2% at hydrogen production of 100 mol/s for scheme 1 and 2.

article info abstract

Article history: Hydrogen production using thermal energy, derived from nuclear reactor, can achieve large-
Received 7 April 2020 scale hydrogen production and solve various energy problems. The concept of hydrogen and
Received in revised form electricity cogeneration can realize the cascade and efficient utilization of high-temperature
25 May 2020 heat derive for very high temperature gas-cooled reactors (VHTRs). High-quality heat is used
Accepted 8 June 2020 for the high-temperature processes of hydrogen production, and low-quality heat is used for
Available online xxx the low-temperature processes of hydrogen production and power generation. In this study,
two hydrogen and electricity cogeneration schemes (S1 and S2), based on the iodine-sulfur
Keywords: process, were proposed for a VHTR with the reactor outlet temperature of 950  C. The ther-
VHTR modynamic analysis model was established for the hydrogen and electricity cogeneration.
Hydrogen The energy and exergy analysis were conducted on two cogeneration systems. The energy
Cogeneration analysis can reflect the overall performance of the systems, and the exergy analysis can
Energy analysis reveal the weak parts of the systems. The analysis results show that the overall hydrogen and
Exergy analysis electricity efficiency of S1 is higher than that of S2, which are 43.6% and 39.2% at the hydrogen
production rate of 100 mol/s, respectively. The steam generators is the components with the
highest exergy loss coefficient, which are the key components for improving the system
performance. This study presents a theoretical foundation for the subsequent optimization
of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs.
© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

* Corresponding author. Institute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Advanced Nuclear Energy Technology Cooperation Innovation
Center, Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Engineering and Safety, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.
E-mail address: zhaogang88@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn (G. Zhao).
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
0360-3199/© 2020 Hydrogen Energy Publications LLC. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
2 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

challenges; however, the majority of hydrogen is produced


Nomenclature from hydrocarbons, i.e., oil (18%), coal (30%), and natural gas
(48%) [2]. Only approximately 4% of H2 is generated from water
Cp specific heat at constant pressure (kJ/kg$K)
through electrolysis [3]. These processes are considered the
Ex exergy (kJ)
cheapest in the short and medium term. However, in the long
ex molar exergy (kJ/mol)
term, nuclear energy is required for extensive hydrogen pro-
G gibbs free energy (kJ/mol)
duction. Nuclear hydrogen production is one of the most
h enthalpy (kJ/kg)
promising methods of efficiently producing large-scale CO2-
n mole (mol)
free hydrogen. VHTRs are the most suitable for hydrogen
Q thermal power (kJ)
production owing to capacity to provide high-temperature
R molar gas constant (kg/mol)
heat. A VHTR could generate up to approximately 600 MWth
s entropy (kJ/kg$K)
at a reactor outlet temperature of 950  C or higher, which can
T temperature ( C)
achieve large-scale industrial hydrogen production [4] and
v stoichiometric number
replace the currently existing method of hydrogen production
W work rate (kJ)
using fossil fuels.
x molar fraction
There are five main hydrogen production processes that
h efficiency
may be considered to be coupled to a nuclear reactor: low-
m chemical potential
temperature electrolysis, high temperature electrolysis, ther-
DHHHV higher heat value (kJ/mol)
mochemical process, hybrid process, and chemical reforming
Abbreviations [5]. The thermochemical cycles are processes in which water
EED electro-electrodialysis cell is decomposed into hydrogen and oxygen via chemical re-
GA General Atomics actions, using intermediate elements, which are recycled. The
HID hydroiodic acid distillation tower sum of all the reactions is equivalent to the dissociation of the
HIP hydroiodic acid purification tower water molecule. Because these cycles only use heat, without
HIR hydroiodic acid decomposition reactor having to convert it to electricity, they have the potential of
IHX intermediate heat exchanger being more efficient than electrolysis, and hence, significantly
INET Institute of Nuclear and New Energy reduce the cost of hydrogen production from water [2]. A
Technology higher temperature is required for higher process-thermal
IS iodine-sulfur efficiency. To date, a number of thermochemical water-
JAEA Japan Atomic Energy Agency splitting cycles have been proposed [6]. The iodine-sulfur (IS)
SAC sulfuric acid concentration tower process is considered the most suitable for hydrogen pro-
SAP sulfuric acid purification tower duction coupled with VHTRs.
SAR sulfuric acid decomposition reactor The IS process was developed by General Atomics (GA) in
SG steam generator the 1970s [7], and since then, substantial research has been
SP state point conducted on this topic, which is termed the GA process. The
VHTR very high temperature gas-cooled reactor IS cycle consists of the following three reactions:

Subscripts 2H2 OðlÞ þ I2 ðlÞ þ SO2 ðgÞ / H2 SO4 ðaq:Þ


0 environment  
þ 2HI ðaq:Þ 20  120+ C (1)
C condensation
ch chemical exergy   
H2 SO4 ðgÞ / H2 OðgÞ þ SO2 ðgÞ þ 1 2O2 ðgÞ 800  900+ C (2)
D diffusion exergy
E electricity  
E-H2 hydrogen and electricity 2HIðgÞ / I2 ðgÞ þ H2 ðgÞ 350  500+ C (3)
in input Reaction (1) is called the Bunsen reaction, which is
m enthalpy exergy exothermic. Lee et al. [8] proposed that 330e350 K is the
ph physical exergy optimal operating window for the Bunsen reaction. Reaction
Q heat exergy (2) involves sulfuric acid (H2SO4) decomposition, which is an
W work exergy endothermic reaction. This reaction consists of two stages:
sys System gaseous sulfuric acid is first decomposed into water and sulfur
out output trioxide (SO3) at 400e500  C, which is then decomposed into
sulfur dioxide (SO2) and oxygen (O2) at 800  C, at the catalytic
action [5]. Reaction (3) is the decomposition of hydroiodic acid
(HI), which generates hydrogen (H2) and iodine (I2). This re-
action can occur in the liquid phase or gas phase [9].
Introduction Research on the IS process has been carried out in many
countries, notably Japan, China, US and France. The Japan
Hydrogen is a clean and safe source of energy that plays a key Atomic Energy Agency (JAEA) has been studying the IS process
role in ensuring an affordable future energy supply [1]. since the middle of the 1980s [10]. In 1998, continuous
Hydrogen helps solving a variety of important energy hydrogen production of 1 normal liter per hour (NL/h) was

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 3

demonstrated for 48 h in a lab-stage study. During 1999e2005, and concluded that the equivalent energy efficiency of the
JAEA completed their research on the design, construction, cogeneration plant is 55.83%. Saeed [26] proposed the concept
and operation of a bench scale experimental facility for of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration GT-MHR, and con-
hydrogen production of 50 NL/h. In 2004, hydrogen was ducted a thermodynamic analysis. It was concluded that the
continuously produced for 1 week at a hydrogen production reactor core is the component with the highest exergy loss in
rate of approximately 30 NL/h [11]. After the bench experi- the entire system and measures to improve the system effi-
ments, JAEA completed an operation for 30 days in rated ciency were proposed. Some scholars have also conducted
operation mode and 50 days in high-temperature operation research on systems for producing hydrogen from other energy
mode in the HTTR, in 2007 and 2009, respectively [12]. sources, including solar energy and brown coal [27,28], etc., and
The Chinese research team, represented by the Institute of their research methods can provide reference for the study on
Nuclear and New Energy Technology (INET) of Tsinghua Uni- hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs.
versity, has also performed many studies on the IS process. In view of the future social and economic development’s
From 2005 to 2007, INET carried out a large number of basic demand for hydrogen energy, and the advantages of using
studies on the three parts of IS process: Bunsen reaction, nuclear energy to produce hydrogen, many countries are
hydroiodic acid decomposition, and sulfuric acid decomposi- actively conducting research on nuclear hydrogen production.
tion [13,14]. At the end of 2008, a closed-loop test apparatus of VHTRs are one of the most suitable reactors to couple with
10 NL/h H2 was designed and established [15]. In 2009, the hydrogen production. Hydrogen and electricity cogeneration
entire process of continuous closed experiment was success- can achieve the efficient utilization of high-temperature heat
fully conducted and hydrogen production lasted for 8 h. In from VHTRs through energy cascade utilization, and improve
2014, an integrated laboratory-scale facility with a H2 capacity energy efficiency. However, the research on hydrogen and
of 100 NL/h was designed and constructed. Recently, 60 h of electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs is still insuffi-
continuous operation, with an actual H2 rate of 60 NL/h, was cient, and it is still at the conceptual design stage. Research
successfully performed in the facility [16]. methods and system characteristics are not clear. Therefore,
The concept of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration it is necessary to carry out in-depth research on the hydrogen
coupled with VHTR is to use the high-quality heat of the VHTR and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs. In this
for the high-temperature processes of hydrogen production paper, two hydrogen and electricity cogeneration systems
and the low-quality heat for the low-temperature processes of were proposed based on the Chinese development of high
hydrogen production and the power generation, achieving the temperature gas-cooled reactors (HTR-10 and HTR-PM), and
cascade and efficient utilization of energy. Previously, re- the detailed energy and exergy analysis methods were given.
searchers in France and Japan carried out research on
hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs
earlier. Framatome proposed the concept of hydrogen and Hydrogen and electricity cogeneration system
electricity cogeneration in 2005 [17]. The reactor outlet tem-
perature was 1000  C, the reactor thermal power was 600 MWt, The hydrogen and electricity cogeneration is a type of cascade
the hydrogen production circuit was based on the IS process, utilization of energy. The high-quality heat from VHTRs is
and the power conversion unit was based on the steam cycle. used for hydrogen production, and the low-quality heat from
Moreover, some French research teams conducted research on VHTRs is used for electricity generation. The hydrogen and
the optimization of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration and electricity can be output simultaneously. In the cogeneration
determined the most effective optimization method [18,19]. system, the intermediate heat exchanger (IHX) and the steam
However, in the follow-up studies, France focused more on fast generator (SG) are important, the heat from VHTRs is trans-
reactors and the research work on VHTR was shelved. ferred to the hydrogen production and electricity generation
The JAEA is committed to the implementation of a cogen- circuits through them, respectively.
eration scheme based on GTHTR300C [20]. GTHTR300C is a The illustrations of the two hydrogen and electricity
VHTR with a thermal power rate of 600 MWt and a reactor cogeneration schemes coupled with VHTRs are shown in Fig. 1
outlet temperature of 950  C, employing a Brayton-cycle gas (S1) and Fig. 2 (S2). VHTR provides heat to both the hydrogen
turbine for electricity generation and the IS process for production and electricity generation units. In both schemes,
hydrogen production. In the cogeneration scheme, 170 MWt the IHX and SG of the power generation unit are connected in
was transferred to the secondary system used for hydrogen a series. First, high-temperature helium from the reactor flows
production, and a hydrogen production capacity of 1.9 tons/h through the IHX and then into the SG. In S1, part of the heat
was obtained at a hydrogen production efficiency of 45.5%. required for the IS process is provided by the IHX, and part of it
The hydrogen production was rated at 1.9 ton/h at 45.5% ef- is supplied by heat extraction from the steam turbine. The
ficiency. In recent years, JAEA has conducted a number of heat required by the sulfuric acid decomposition reactor (SAR)
experimental studies on cogeneration (HTTR-GT/H2) in the and hydroiodic acid decomposition reactor (HIR) is provided
HTTR to validate the design and control strategy [21e23]. via the secondary side helium of the IHX. The heat required by
Simultaneously, the JAEA also conducted some safety analysis the sulfuric acid purification tower (SAP) and the sulfuric acid
on hydrogen and electricity cogeneration [24]. concentration tower (SAC) is provided by heat extraction from
In addition, some scholars have performed theoretical the high-pressure steam turbine. The heat required by the
studies on hydrogen and electricity cogeneration. Tomasz [25] hydroiodic acid purification tower (HIP) and the hydroiodic
performed a thermodynamic analysis of a nuclear hydrogen acid distillation tower (HID) is provided by heat extraction of
and electricity cogeneration based on a gas turbine direct cycle, the low-pressure steam turbine.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
4 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 1 e Diagram of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTR (S1).

In S2, the heat required for the IS process is supplied by the azeotropic point; thus, it is difficult to further purify solution
IHX. The heat required by the SAR and HIR is provided by the by distillation. The EED method can effectively concentrate
secondary side helium of the IHX. The heat required by the the HI solution, resulting in a higher HI concentration than the
other four key components (HIP, HID, SAP, and SAC) is pro- azeotrope of the mixture [29]. The EED cells require a stable
vided by the steam produced by the steam generator (SG2) in power supply and do not require external energy heating and
the IHX unit. SAR, HIR, and SG2 are connected in a series. A cooling.
bypass in parallel with SAR and HIR is used to isolate the IS Comparing the two schemes, it can be found that the S1 is
process from the VHTR power generation unit and the heat of simpler, and the steam can be directly extracted from the
the IHX can be derived by the condenser of the SG2 unit. steam turbine, but the S2 is more secure, and the hydrogen
The electro-electrodialysis cell (EED) is shown in Figs. 1 and production circuit and the electricity generation circuit are
2. As the concentration of HI in the hydroiodic acid phase isolated. In the S2, the SG2 can be used as a pressurizer when
solution, obtained from the Bunsen reactor, is close to the the operating conditions change.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 5

Fig. 2 e Diagram of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs (S2).

IHXdIntermediate heat exchanger; SGdSteam generator; performance of the cogeneration system can be better evalu-
HIPdHydroiodic acid purification tower; HIDdHydroiodic ated by comprehensively using energy analysis and exergy
acid distillation tower; HIRdHydroiodic acid decomposition analysis.
reactor; SAPdSulfuric acid purification tower; SACdSulfuric
acid concentration tower; SARdSulfuric acid decomposition Energy analysis
reactor; CONdCondenser.
Based on the first law of thermodynamics, the energy balance
equations of the three key units of the system can be obtained.
Thermodynamic model The energy balance equations for S1 and S2 differ slightly. The
energy balance equation of the system will be established by
The thermodynamic performance of the hydrogen-electric considering S1 as an example.
cogeneration system can be evaluated using two methods:
energy analysis and exergy analysis. The basis of energy
analysis is the conservation of the quantity of energy, which is Table 1 e Molar standard chemical exergies for selected
the first law of thermodynamics. The basis of exergy analysis is substances [34].
the conservation of exergy, which is the first and second law of Compounds ex0ch (kJ/mol) Compounds ex0ch (kJ/mol)
thermodynamics. Whereas, energy analysis only reflects the
H2SO4 (g) 160.53 O2 (g) 3.97
external losses of the system, exergy analysis can reflect both SO2 (g) 310.99 H2 (g) 236.1
the internal and external exergy losses of the system and reveal H2O (g) 9.34 HI (g) 205.42
the system weak links [30]. Thus, the thermodynamic H2O (l) 0.77 I2 (g) 178.14

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
6 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

Table 2 e Main parameters of the hydrogen and electricity cogeneration systems.


Reactor unit Electricity generation unit
Parameter Value Parameter Value
Reactor power (MW) 250 Main steam pressure (SP 21) (MPa) 13.9
Mass flow of the primary circuit (kg/s) 68.75 Main steam temperature (SP 21) ( C) 566
Reactor outlet temperature (SP 2) ( C) 950 Feed water temperature (SP 28) ( C) 205
Reactor inlet temperature (SP 1) ( C) 250 Steam temperature/pressure of SG2 (SP 16) ( C/MPa) 200/1.0

The energy balance equation of the primary circuit (reactor absence of electricity, magnetism, surface tension, and nu-
circuit) is: clear reaction, the overall exergy can be divided into three
parts: heat exergy, work exergy, and enthalpy exergy. Among
QR þ WC;1 ¼ QIHX þ QSG þ Ql;1 (4)
them, enthalpy exergy can be divided into four parts: potential
The energy balance equation of the IHX circuit is: exergy, kinetic exergy, physical exergy, and chemical exergy
[31]. Potential exergy and kinetic exergy are often not
QIHX þ WC;2 ¼ QHIR þ QSAR þ Ql;2 (5) considered in the analysis as they are negligible in magnitude
The energy balance equation of the power generation cir- for the given material streams [32]. Additionally, chemical
cuit is: exergy can be divided into chemical reaction exergy and
X diffusion exergy. The expression for heat exergy is:
QSG ¼ QSG;G þ QSG;IS;i þ Ql;3 (6)
i
X· X 
T0 ·
E xQ;i ¼ 1 Qi (13)
Ti
X X i i

QSG;IS;i ¼ MIS;i gIS;i (7)


The amount of work exergy is equal to the amount of work:
i i

X· X ·
where subscript c represents the circulator, subscript l rep- E xw;i ¼ Wi (14)
resents the thermal power lost, MIS the mass flow of steam i i

extraction for the IS process, gEX,IS is the latent heat of steam, The enthalpy exergy is then the sum of physical exergy and
and i refers to HIP, HID, SAP, and SAC respectively. chemical exergy (potential exergy and kinetic exergy are
The overall heat and work requirement of IS process is: neglected):
X
QIS ¼ QHIR þ QSAR þ Mi gIS;i (8) X· X· X· X·
i
E xm;i ¼ ni  exm;i ¼ ni  exph;i þ ni  exch;i (15)
i i i i

WIS ¼ WEED þ WEL (9) where exm;i is the molar enthalpy exergy, and exph;i and exch;i
are the molar physical exergy and molar chemical exergy,
where subscript EL represents the pumps and other compo-
respectively.
nents in the IS process. The definition of the efficiency of
hydrogen production is:
Physical and chemical exergy
DHHHV Physical exergy refers to the part of energy that can be con-
hIS ¼   (10)
verted furthest into useful work when the system reaches a
QIS þ WhEIS NH2

where DHHHV is the high heating value of hydrogen, which is


the amount of heat released when 1 mol of hydrogen is
completely burned to produce liquid water, and DHHHV-
¼ 285.83  103 kJ/mol. NH2 is the production of hydrogen in
mol/s. The power generation efficiency of S1 is:

WG  WP
hE ¼ P (11)
QSG  QSG;IS;i
i

The overall hydrogen and electricity efficiency is:

DHHHV NH2 þ WNET


hEH2 ¼ (12)
QR

Exergy analysis

In a given environment, exergy is the part of energy that can


theoretically be converted maximally to “fully convertible
energy”, which is unified between the quality and quantity, Fig. 3 e Total hydrogen and electricity efficiency at different
such as electromagnetic energy and mechanical energy. In the hydrogen production.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 7

T*2 T*3 T*4 1


h  h0 ¼ AT* þ B þC þD E * þFH (18)
2 3 4 T

T*2 T*3 1
s ¼ AlnðT* Þ þ BT* þ C þD  E *2 þ G (19)
2 3 2T
where T* ¼ T/1000, and A, B, C, D, E, F, G, and H are Shomate
constants.

Standard chemical reaction exergy


The standard chemical reaction exergy is that produced when
that the composition of the reactants is different from the
environment. The standard chemical reaction exergy can be
calculated using a reference chemical reaction, as follows:
X X
ex0ch þ vi ex0ch;i ¼ wmax þ vj ex0ch;j (20)
R P
Fig. 4 e Output power at different hydrogen production
rate. where ex0ch is the molar standard chemical exergy of the sub-
stance to be determined, v is the stoichiometric number, P
represents the products, R represents the reactants, and wmax
constrained balance through a reversible physical process. is the maximum useful work of the chemical reaction.
Chemical exergy refers to the part of energy that can be con- 0
Because wmax ¼  DG298:15 , Eq. (20) can be expressed as:
verted furthest into useful work when the system reaches an
unconstrained balance from a constrained balance through a 0 X X
ex0ch ¼  DG298:15 þ vj ex0ch;j  vi ex0ch;i (21)
reversible physical process (diffusion) or chemical process P R

(chemical reaction).
Standard chemical exergy values for most substances can
According to this relationship between the physical and
be determined by the exergoecology portal [34]. The standard
chemical exergy, the molar enthalpy exergy in Eq. (15) can be
chemical exergies of the substances involved in this paper are
expressed as follows [31]:
listed in Table 1.
exm;i ¼ exph;i þ ex0ch;i (16)
Diffusion exergy
Physical exergy can be calculated as follows: Diffusion exergy is the useful energy produced when the
concentration of the components is different from the envi-
exph;i ¼ hi  h0  T0 ðsi  s0 Þ (17) ronment, i.e., the chemical potential of component i in the
where h and s are the molar enthalpy and molar entropy, mixture (mi0 ) is different from that in the environment (m0i ). The
respectively, and the subscript 0 indicates properties at the diffusion exergy is numerically equal to the minimum useful
restricted dead state of P0 and T0. h and s can be evaluated work that must be consumed in order to reversibly extract the
using the Shomate equations or Aspen plus. The Shomate mixture under the constrained equilibrium (T0 ;P0 ;mi0 ) from the
equations can be expressed as follows [33]: environment (T0 ;P0 ; m0i ), but with the opposite sign. Therefore,
the molar diffusion exergy can be calculated as follows:

X
k
 
exD ¼ xi mi0  m0i (22)
i¼1

where xi is the molar fraction of component i. For an ideal gas


or solution, Eq. (22) can be expressed as:

X
k
xi0
exD ¼ RT0 xi0 ln (23)
i¼1
x0i

where xi0 and x0i are the molar fraction of component i in the
mixture and environment, respectively, and R is the molar gas
constant. When the diffusion exergy of the concentration or
purification process needs to be calculated, the diffusion
exergy of the outlet can be calculated based on that of the inlet
to obtain the change in the diffusion exergy during the
process.

Fig. 5 e Power generation efficiency at different hydrogen Balance equation


production rate. The exergy balance equation of the system is:

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
8 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

Fig. 6 e Exergy loss coefficient of key components.

The exergy loss coefficient of component i can be


· X · X · X · expressed as:
DE xsys ¼ E xin  E xout  E xlost (24)
· .X ·
P _ P _ hlost;i ¼ E xlost;i E xin;i (26)
where Exin and Exout are the input and output exergies,
P _
respectively, Exlost is the sum of the exergy loss of the
The system exergy efficiency is the ratio of the output
components, including internal losses and external losses,
exergy to the input exergy, as follows:
_ sys is the system exergy change over time. For a steady-
and DEx
, ,
_ sys ¼ 0. Eq. (24) can be expressed as:
state system, DEx X· X· X· X·
hex ¼ E xout;i E xin;i ¼ 1  E xlost;i E xin;i
! ! i i i i
X· X· X· X· X· X
E xlost;i ¼ E xQ;in;i  E xQ;out;i þ E xw;in;i  E xw;out;i ¼1 hlost;i (27)
i i i i i i
!
X· X· The calculation formula for the exergy efficiency of
þ E xm;in;i  E xm;out;i
i i component i is:
(25) · ·
hex;i ¼ E xout;i E xin;i ¼ 1  hlost;i (28)

Results and discussion

The main parameters of the primary circuit used for the


hydrogen and electricity cogeneration refer to HTR-PM [35,36];
however, the reactor outlet temperature was improved to
950  C. The parameters of key state points (SPs) of the
hydrogen and electricity cogeneration in Figs. 1 and 2 are lis-
ted in Table 2. The data of the IS process is based on the
calculation results in Refs. [37].
Based on the above analysis model and parameters, the
two hydrogen and electricity cogeneration systems were
analyzed and compared. The exergy analysis was conducted
on several key components. Figs. 3e5 present the results
obtained through energy analysis, which compares three
crucial parameters at different hydrogen production rate.
Figs. 6 and 8 present the results obtained through exergy
Fig. 7 e Output temperature at the primary side of the IHX
analysis on several components, which are at the same
at different hydrogen production rate.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 9

Fig. 8 e Exergy efficiency comparison of key components.

hydrogen production rate of 156 mol/s. The reactor core was belongs to the electricity generation circuit and the SG2 be-
not analyzed because it was not an optimization goal for the longs to hydrogen production circuit. The increase in NH2
hydrogen and electricity cogeneration system. The temper- indicates that the power of the hydrogen production circuit
ature and pressure of several key points in S1 and S2 are increases and the power of the electricity generation circuit
listed in Table 3 at a hydrogen production rate of 156 mol/s. decreases; therefore, the exergy loss of the SG2 increases and
The comparison of the overall hydrogen and electricity the exergy loss of the SG decreases. The changes in exergy
efficiency (hE-H2) of the two cogeneration systems, at loss of the SG and SG2 result in changes of hE-H2 at different
different hydrogen production rates (NH2), was shown in NH2. Notably, improving the exergy efficiency of the SG2 is
Fig. 3 hE-H2 of S1 is higher than that of S2. As the NH2 in- the key to increasing hE-H2.
creases, hE-H2 of S1 increases, and hE-H2 of S2 decreases. hE-H2 Fig. 4 illustrates the relationship between the output power
are 43.6% and 39.2% at hydrogen production rate of 100 mol/s and hydrogen production rate. At the same NH2, S1 has more
for S1 and S2, respectively. The results of the exergy analysis the output power than S2. As NH2 increases, the output power
demonstrated the reason for the changes in hE-H2. In Fig. 6, decreases. This is because when NH2 increases, the power
the components with the highest exergy loss coefficient in S1 ratio of the IHX increases, and accordingly, the power ratio of
and S2 are the SG and SG2, respectively. However, the SG the SG decreases. Fig. 5 illustrates the comparison of the

Table 3 e Temperature and pressure of key points in the cogeneration systems.


Temperature ( C)/Pressure (MPa)
S1 S2
Inlet Outlet Inlet Outlet
IS process SAR (Helium) 880/7.2 524/7.15 880/7.2 776/7.15
SAP (Water) 220.9/1.0 180/1.0 200/1.0 180/1.0
SAC (Water) 220.9/1.0 180/1.0 200/1.0 180/1.0
HIR (Helium) 524/7.15 480/7.1 776/7.15 763/7.1
HIP (Water) 188/0.75 168/0.75 200/1.0 180/1.0
HID (Water) 188/0.75 168/0.75 200/1.0 180/1.0
IHX Primary side (Helium) 950/7.15 (SP 2) 879.5/7.1 (SP 3) 950/7.15 (SP 2) 597/7.1 (SP 3)
Secondary side (Helium) 480/7.25 (SP 14) 880/7.2 (SP 11) 300/7.25 (SP 15) 880/7.2 (SP 11)
SG Primary side (Helium) 880/7.1 (SP 3) 245/7.05 (SP 4) 597/7.1 (SP 3) 245/7.05 (SP 4)
Secondary side (Water) 205/14.2 (SP 28) 566/13.9 (SP 21) 205/14.2 (SP 28) 566/13.9 (SP 21)
SG2 Primary side (Helium) e e 763/7.1 (SP 13) 300/7.05 (SP 14)
Secondary side (Water) e e 200/1.0 (SP 18) 179.9/1.0 (SP 16)

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
10 international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx

power generation efficiency (hE) for different NH2. hE of S1 is 2. The exergy analysis can reveal the internal losses in the
higher than that of S2. As NH2 increases, hE of S1 is improved systems and explain the results of the energy analysis. The
and that of S2 is remains approximately unchanged. For S1, components with the highest exergy loss coefficient are
the extraction ratio from the steam turbine, used for hydrogen the SG (12.9%) and SG2 (14.7%), for S1 and S2, respectively.
production, increases when NH2 increases. These steam The optimization of inlet and outlet parameters is crucial
extraction is low-quality steam, therefore, hE is improved as for improving the overall hydrogen and electricity effi-
NH2 increases. For S2, it is not necessary to extract steam from ciency. The comparison of the exergy efficiency shows that
the turbine to supply the hydrogen production circuit, and hE the 1 # feedwater heater has the lowest exergy efficiency of
does not change as NH2 changes. the analyzed components. In addition, the concentration
The results of the exergy analysis at the hydrogen pro- and purification components in the IS process should be
duction rate of 156 mol/s indicate that the components with further optimized.
the highest exergy loss coefficient (defined in Eq. (26) in S1 and
S2 are the SG with a value of 12.9% and i the SG2 with a value The thermodynamic analysis model in this study lays a
of 14.7%, respectively. For both components, the inlet and theoretical foundation for the subsequent optimization of
outlet parameters of the SG and SG2 need to be further opti- hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs.
mized. The overall exergy loss coefficient of the S1 is 32.6%,
and that of the S2 is 38.2%. This result is consistent with the
results of energy analysis. Fig. 7 illustrates the change of the
Acknowledgements
output temperature of the primary side of the IHX (T3) at the
different NH2. In S1, the hot end of the SG has a large tem-
Funding: This work was supported by the National Key R&D
perature difference (DT), which is a main reason of large
Program of China (Grant No. 2018YFB1900500), the National
exergy loss coefficient. When NH2 is 156 mol/s, DT is 313  C.
Science and Technology Major Project (Grant No. ZX069), the
From the definition in Eqs. (27) and (28), it can be observed
National Hitech R&D Program of China (863 Program) (No.
that the exergy loss coefficient is related to the heat transfer
2005AA511010), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation
quantity of the components and the exergy efficiency (defined
(No. 2019M650702), and the Youth Talent Project of China
in Eq. (28)) can better reflect the performance of the compo-
National Nuclear Corporation.
nents. Of the analyzed components, the 1 # feedwater heater
has the lowest exergy efficiency. For S2, the exergy efficiency
of the SG2 is only 55.2%, which is consistent with the analysis references
on the exergy loss coefficient. However, the exergy efficiency
of SGs are not low, 82.8% and 92.1% for S1 and S2, respectively.
In addition, the exergy efficiency of the concentration and [1] Sun Q, Gao QX, Zhang P, Peng W, Chen SZ, Zhao G, Wang J.
purification components in the IS process, especially SAP in Numerical study of heat transfer and sulfuric acid
S2, is relatively low. decomposition in the process of hydrogen production. Int J
Energy Res 2019;43:5969e82. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.4714.
[2] Vitart X, Le Duigou A, Carles P. Hydrogen production using
the sulfureiodine cycle coupled to a VHTR: an overview.
Conclusions Energy Convers Manag 2006;47(17):2740e7. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.enconman.2006.02.010.
Hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with VHTRs [3] Ewan BCR, Allen RWK. A figure of merit assessment of the
can achieve efficient utilization of high-temperature heat from routes to hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2005;30:809e19.
VHTRs through energy cascade utilization, and improve the https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2005.02.003.
[4] Bertrand F, Germain T, Bentivoglio F, Bonnet F, Moyart Q,
energy efficiency. In this study, two hydrogen and electricity
Aujollet P. Safety study of the coupling of a VHTR with a
cogeneration schemes coupled with VHTRs (S1 and S2) based
hydrogen production plant. Nucl Eng Des 2011;241:2580e96.
on the iodine-sulfur process were proposed. The energy and https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2011.04.036.
exergy analysis were used to evaluate the performance of these [5] Yan X, Ryutaro H. Nuclear hydrogen production handbook.
two cogeneration schemes. The reactor outlet temperature CRC Press; 2011. p. 53e6.
was 950  C. In S1, the heat supplied for the purification and [6] Funk JE. Thermochemical hydrogen production: past and
concentration components in the hydrogen production circuit present. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2011;26(3):185e90. https://
doi.org/10.1016/S0360-3199(00)00062-8.
was extracted from the steam turbine. In S2, the hydrogen
[7] Norman JH, Besenbruch GE, Brown LC, O’Keefe DR, Allen CL.
production circuit and the power generation circuit were iso- Thermochemical water-splitting cycle, bench-scale
lated. Thus, the following conclusions can be obtained: investigations, and process engineering. San Diego, CA
(USA): GA Technologies, Inc; 1982. https://www.osti.gov/
1. The results obtained through energy analysis indicate that biblio/5063416.
the overall hydrogen and electricity efficiency of S1 is [8] Lee BJ, No HC, Yoon HJ, Kim SJ, Kim ES. An optimal operating
window for the Bunsen process in the I-S thermochemical
higher than that of S2. As the hydrogen production rate
cycle. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2008;33(9):2200e10. https://
increases, the overall hydrogen and electricity efficiency of
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2008.02.045.
the S1 improved, while the efficiency of S2 declined. [9] Bae KK, Park CS, Kim CH, Kang KS, Lee SH, Hwang GJ, et al.
Furthermore, as the hydrogen production rate increases, Hydrogen production by thermochemical water-splitting IS
the power generation efficiency of S1 increases signifi- process. In: 16th world hydrogen energy conference
cantly, while that of S2 remains unchanged. 2006(WHEC 2006); 2006. p. 1251e6. Lyon, France, June 13e16.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080
international journal of hydrogen energy xxx (xxxx) xxx 11

[10] Kasahara S, Kubo S, Hino R, Onuki K, Nomura M, Nakao S. water-splitting iodineesulphur process utilizing heat from
Flowsheet study of the thermochemical water-splitting the high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Int J Hydrogen
iodineesulfur process for effective hydrogen production. Int J Energy 2007;32:4160e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Hydrogen Energy 2007;32(4):489e96. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.ijhydene.2007.06.005.
j.ijhydene.2006.05.005. [24] Verfondern K, Yan X, Nishihara T, Allelein H-J. Safety
[11] Yamawaki M, Nishihara T, Inagaki Y, Minato K, Oigawa H, concept of nuclear cogeneration of hydrogen and electricity.
Onuki K, Hino R, Ogawa M. Application of nuclear energy for Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:7551e9. https://doi.org/
environmentally friendly hydrogen generation. Int J 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.239.
Hydrogen Energy 2007;32(14):2719e25. https://doi.org/ [25] Tomasz K, Janusz B, Mateusz B. Energy and exergy analysis
10.1016/j.ijhydene.2006.09.026. of hydrogen production combined with electric energy
[12] Goto M, Shinohara M, Tochio D, Shimazaki Y, Hamamoto S, generation in a nuclear cogeneration cycle. Energy Convers
Tachibana Y. Long-term high-temperature operation of the Manag 2019;198:111805. https://doi.org/10.1016/
HTTR. Nucl Eng Des 2012;251:181e90. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.enconman.2019.111805.
j.nucengdes.2011.10.047. [26] Saeed GG, Mostafa R, Hadi G. Thermodynamic analysis of a
[13] Bai Y, Zhang P, Guo HF, Chen SZ, Wang LJ, Xu JM. Purification novel power-hydrogen cogeneration system. Energy Convers
of sulfuric and hydriodic acids phases in the iodine-sulfur Manag 2018;171:1093e105. https://doi.org/10.1016/
process. Chin J Chem Eng 2009;17(1):160e6. https://doi.org/ j.enconman.2018.06.033.
10.1016/S1004-9541(09)60049-5. [27] He W, Namar MM, Li ZX, Maleki A, Tlili I, Shadloo MS.
[14] Guo HF, Zhang P, Bai Y, Wang LJ, Chen SZ, Xu JM. Continuous Thermodynamic analysis of a solar-driven high-temperature
purification of H2SO4 and HI phases by packed column in IS steam electrolyzer for clean hydrogen production. Appl
process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35(7):2836e9. https:// Therm Eng 2020;172:115152. https://doi.org/10.1016/
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.009. j.applthermaleng.2020.115152.
[15] Zhang P, Chen SZ, Wang LJ, Xu JM. Overview of nuclear [28] Aziz M, Zaini IN, Oda T, Morihara A, Kashiwagi T. Energy
hydrogen production research through iodine sulfur process conservative brown coal conversion to hydrogen and power
at INET. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2010;35(7):2883e7. https:// based on enhanced process integration: integrated drying,
doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2009.05.031. coal direct chemical looping, combined cycle and
[16] Zhang P, Wang L, Chen SG, Xu JM. Progress of nuclear hydrogenation. Int J Hydrogen Energy 2017;42:2904e13.
hydrogen production through the iodineesulfur process in https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.10.060.
China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2018;81:1802e12. https:// [29] Chen SZ, Zhang P, Yao TY, Wang LJ, Xu JM. HI concentration
doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.275. of HIx (HI-H2O-I2) solution in iodine-sulfur water splitting
[17] Gauthier JC, Brinkmann G, Copsey B, Lecomte M. Antares: cycle by electro-electrodialysis. J Xi’An Jiaotong Univ
the HTR/VHTR Project at framatome ANP. Nucl Eng Des 2008;42(2):252e5. http://zkxb.xjtu.edu.cn/oa/DArticle.aspx?
2006;236(5e6):526e33. https://doi.org/10.1016/ type¼view&id¼200802028.
j.nucengdes.2005.10.030. [30] Sankaranarayanan K, Van Der Kooi HJ, de Swaan Arons J.
[18] Adrien G, Catherine AP, Luc P, Serge D, Christian L, Patrick D, Efficiency and sustainability in the energy and chemical
David H. Optimization of electricity/hydrogen cogeneration industries: scientific principles and case studies. Crc Press;
from generation IV nuclear energy systems. Comput Aided 2010.
Chem Eng 2007;24:1109e14. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1570- [31] Zhu MS. Exergy analysis of energy system. Beijing: Tsinghua
7946(07)80209-4. Univ Press; 1988.
[19] Adrien G, Luc P, Catherine AP, Serge D, Christian L, David H. [32] Liu F, Chen G, Yan B, Ma WC, Cheng AJ, LA H. Exergy analysis
Multiobjective genetic algorithm strategies for electricity of a new lignocellulosic biomass-based polygeneration
production from generation IV nuclear technology. Energy system. Energy 2017;140:1087e95. https://doi.org/10.1016/
Convers Manag 2010;51(4):859e71. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.energy.2017.09.040.
j.enconman.2009.11.022. [33] NIST. National institute of standards and technology. 2009.
[20] Kunitomi K, Yan X, Nishihara T, Sakaba N, Mouri T. JAEA’s http://webbook.nist.gov/chemistry/. [Accessed 23 February
VHTR for hydrogen and electricity cogeneration: 2015].
GTHTR300C. Nucl Eng Technol 2007;39(1):9e20. https://www. [34] The exergoecology portal. 2015. http://www.exergoecology.
kns.org/pages/publishing/net. com/excalc/. [Accessed 22 February 2015].
[21] Sato H, Kubo S, Yan XL, Tachibana Y, KatoY. Control [35] Zhang ZY, Wu ZX, Wang DZ, Xu YH, Sun YL, Li F, Dong YJ.
strategies for transients of hydrogen production plant in Current status and technical description of Chinese 2250
VHTR cogeneration systems. Prog Nucl Energy MWth HTR-PM demonstration plant. Nucl Eng Des
2011;53(7):1009e16. https://doi.org/10.1016/ 2009;239(7):1212e9. https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.pnucene.2011.04.013. j.nucengdes.2009.02.023.
[22] Sato H, Nomoto Y, Horii S, Sumita J, Yan XL. HTTR-GT/H2 [36] Zhang ZY, Wu ZX, Sun YL, Li F. Design aspects of the Chinese
test planteSystem performance evaluation for HTTR gas modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor HTR-PM. Nucl
turbine cogeneration plant. Nucl Eng Des 2018;329:247e54. Eng Des 2006;236(5e6):485e90. https://doi.org/10.1016/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.07.021. j.nucengdes.2005.11.024.
[23] Sakaba N, Kasahara S, Onuki K, Kunitomi K. Conceptual [37] Guo HF. Study on the process simulation of iodine-sulfur
design of hydrogen production system with thermochemical thermochemical cycle. Beijing: Tsinghua Univ; 2012.

Please cite this article as: Qu X et al., Thermodynamic evaluation of hydrogen and electricity cogeneration coupled with very high
temperature gas-cooled reactors, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.06.080

You might also like