Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Limits CompleteSet
Limits CompleteSet
NON-COMMERCIAL
This set of modules is not for sale and is freely distributed. It is also used for educational purposes only.
LICENSING
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/.
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................... 78
EXTRAS................................................................................................................................. 79
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿
→
We do not need to have the function defined at 𝑎 but we can have 𝑥 get closer and closer to 𝑎 so we could see
that 𝑓(𝑥) gets closer and closer to 𝐿.
Here’s an example:
lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3
→
This means, as 𝑥 gets closer and closer to 2, the function 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3 gets closer and closer to some value.
1. Using a graph
2. Using a table of values
3. Through limit theorems
1
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟐𝒙 + 𝟑
1.9 10.41
1.99 10.9401
1.999 10.994001
2.001 11.006001
2.01 11.0601
2.1 11.61
Does the function seem to approach 11 as x approached 2? We’ll find out.
LIMIT THEOREMS
In finding limits, you could use a graph or a table of values, but a graph may take too long and a table of values
might be too much work for you. Fortunately, there are limit theorems you can use to speed up calculations.
Let 𝑓(𝑥), 𝑔(𝑥), and ℎ(𝑥) be functions of 𝑥, 𝑐 be a constant, and 𝐿 = lim 𝑓(𝑥), 𝑀 = lim 𝑔(𝑥), and 𝑁 = lim ℎ(𝑥).
→ → →
4. Limit of a Sum or Difference (If combined, Theorem 4 from this point on. If separated, Limit of a Sum is
Theorem 4a and Limit of a Difference is Theorem 4b)
lim [𝑓(𝑥) ± 𝑔(𝑥)] = lim 𝑓(𝑥) ± lim 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝐿 ± 𝑀
→ → →
7. Limit of a Power/Radical (Theorem 7 from this point on. Recall that a radical can be written as a rational power)
2
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Commonly, only the first eight theorems are taught in Calculus courses. I decided to include the last two
theorems here as these can be used to derive other limits, as we will see later in this module, in Module 3, and in
Module 4. The proofs of these theorems will be shown in Module 16. Theorems 8 and 9 will be discussed in more
detail in Module 6.
Now, let’s try using these limit theorems to evaluate our example above.
lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3
→
3
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Then let’s try another limit that’s a bit trickier than the first.
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 12
lim
→ 𝑥−6
You’d be tempted to use Theorem 6 (Limit of a Quotient), but if you try evaluating:
(6) − 8(6) + 12
=
(6) − 6
36 − 48 + 12
=
0
0
=
0
So, what is ? Is it 0, 1, or ∞? In that case, we call an indeterminate form. There are seven indeterminate forms:
0 ∞
, , 0 ⋅ ∞, ∞ − ∞, 0 , 1 , and ∞ are all indeterminate forms.
0 ∞
If we get any of these, there’s usually another way to get the limit. Now, let’s try that example again, using another
method.
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 12
lim
→ 𝑥−6
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 12
lim = 4
5 → 𝑥−6 Subtract 2 from 6
∎
Now, here’s an even trickier example:
𝑥 − 23
lim
→ √𝑥 + 2 − 5
4
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
3 (𝑥 − 23)(√𝑥 + 2 + 5)
lim Multiply to get a single expression
→ (𝑥 + 2) − 25
4 (𝑥 − 23) √𝑥 + 2 + 5
lim Subtract 25 from 2
→ 𝑥 − 23
5 lim √𝑥 + 2 + 5
→
Divide (𝑥 − 23)(√𝑥 + 2 + 5) by 𝑥 − 23
7 √25 + 5 Add 2 to 23
9 𝑥 − 23
lim = 10
→ √𝑥 + 2 − 5 Add 5 to 5
∎
Finally, a very tricky example:
𝜋
lim 𝑥 sin
→ 𝑥
1 𝜋 Given
lim 𝑥 sin
→ 𝑥
2 −1 ≤ sin(𝑥) ≤ 1 We cannot do any direct evaluation, factoring or multiplication
by a conjugate. So, we use the bounds of the sine function.
3 𝜋 Changing the argument in the sine function does not change the
−1 ≤ sin≤1
𝑥 bounds of the function.
𝜋
4 −𝑥 ≤ 𝑥 sin ≤𝑥 Multiply all parts of the inequality by 𝑥
𝑥
lim −𝑥 = 0 , lim 𝑥 = 0
5 → → Get the limits of −𝑥 and 𝑥 as 𝑥 approaches 0.
5
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
ONE-SIDED LIMI TS
In the basic form of a limit lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿, we get a limit from both sides of 𝑎 (as we had seen in the table of values
→
in the previous module). Sometimes, we want to know what is happening as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎 from only one side.
These are called one-sided limits and come in two forms.
Let 𝐿 represent the limit as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎 from the left, and 𝐿 represent the limit as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎 from the
right. We have:
The left-hand limit is the limit as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎 from the left. It is indicated by a little minus sign (-) above the
𝑎. The right-hand limit is the limit as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎 from the right. It is indicated by a little plus sign (+) above
the 𝑎.
lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3
→
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟐𝒙 + 𝟑
1.9 10.41
1.99 10.9401
1.999 10.994001
1.9999 10.99940001
1.99999 10.9999400001
1.999999 10.999994000001
It seems we’re approaching 11, so: lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3 = 11
→
lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3
→
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟐𝒙 + 𝟑
2.000001 11.000006000001
2.00001 11.0000600001
2.0001 11.00060001
2.001 11.006001
2.01 11.0601
6
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
2.1 11.61
It seems the value is also approaching 11, so: lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3 = 11
→
In the previous example, we saw that both the left-hand and right-hand limits generated the same value, which is
11. The previous module showed us that lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3 = 11. What does that indicate?
→
If lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥) , then lim 𝑓(𝑥) exists and lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥).
→ → → → → →
Basically, if the left-hand and right-hand limits are equal, then the limit from both sides exists and is equal to both
of the one-sided limits.
If lim 𝑓(𝑥) ≠ lim 𝑓(𝑥) , then lim 𝑓(𝑥) does not exist.
→ → →
Similarly, if the one-sided limits do not equal, then the limit from both sides will not exist. This will commonly
happen with piecewise functions, even roots of odd powers, and logarithmic functions.
|𝑥|
lim 𝑓(𝑥) , 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥 , 𝑥≠0
→
0 , 𝑥=0
|𝒙| |𝒙|
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) =
𝒙 𝒙
-1 -1 1 1
-0.1 -1 0.1 1
-0.01 -1 0.01 1
-0.001 -1 0.001 1
-0.0001 -1 0.0001 1
It seems the function is approaching two different values as 𝑥 approaches 0. When 𝑥 approaches 0 from the left,
𝑓(𝑥) appears to be approaching -1, but when 𝑥 approaches 0 from the right, 𝑓(𝑥) approaches 1 instead. Since the
one-sided limits don’t equal, lim 𝑓(𝑥) does not exist.
→
7 − 4𝑥, 𝑥 < 1
lim 𝑓(𝑥) , 𝑓(𝑥) =
→ 𝑥 + 2, 𝑥 ≥ 1
7
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝟕 − 𝟒𝒙 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙𝟐 + 𝟐
0.75 4 1.25 3.5625
0.9 3.4 1.1 3.21
0.99 3.04 1.01 3.0201
0.999 3.004 1.001 3.002001
0.9999 3.0004 1.0001 3.00020001
We find that lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 3 and lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 3. Since both one-sided limits are equal, then the limit from both
→ →
sides will exist and lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 3.
→
lim √𝑥
→
Notice that we can’t define square roots of negative numbers (in the set of real numbers anyway; complex
numbers will be dealt with in a separate set of modules), so we can only take one of the one-sided limits, in this
case, the right-hand limit.
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = √𝒙 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = √𝒙
Real: (None)
-1 1 1
Complex: 𝑖
Real: (None)
-0.01 0.01 0.1
Complex: 0.1𝑖
Real: (None)
-0.0001 0.0001 0.01
Complex: 0.01𝑖
Real: (None)
-0.000001 0.000001 0.001
Complex: 0.001𝑖
Real: (None)
-0.00000001 0.00000001 0.0001
Complex: 0.0001𝑖
In this case, the limit from both sides will not exist.
Now for a logarithmic function: lim ln(𝑥). This is the same case as above, where we can only define a right-hand
→
limit, so the limit from both sides won’t exist with this one either.
8
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
INFINITE LIMI TS
Infinite limits are limits whose value is either positive or negative infinity.
This will also apply to one-sided limits: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞, lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞, lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞, or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞.
→ → → →
LIMITS TO INFINITY
These limits are automatically one-sided limits, as there are no values greater than +∞ (meaning lim 𝑓(𝑥) is a
→
left-hand limit), and there are no values less than −∞ (meaning lim 𝑓(𝑥) is a right-hand limit). Limits to infinity
→
can also be infinite limits if lim 𝑓(𝑥) = ±∞ (From this module on, ±∞ will be used here to mean +∞ or −∞).
→±
In evaluating limits to infinity, here are a few useful facts before we go on evaluating them:
1
lim =0
→± 𝑥
Basically, as 𝑥 gets larger and larger or smaller and smaller, gets closer and closer to 0.
In evaluating a limit to infinity of a polynomial function, get the limit of the term with the highest exponent. The
proofs of these two facts above will be shown in Module 16.
1
lim
→ 𝑥
We start by getting the one-sided limits, as we must see what happens as 𝑥 approaches 0 from both sides.
𝟏 𝟏
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) =
𝒙 𝒙
-1 -1 1 1
-0.1 -10 0.1 10
-0.01 -100 0.01 100
9
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
1
lim
→ 𝑥
𝟏 𝟏
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) =
𝒙𝟐 𝒙𝟐
-1 1 1 1
-0.1 100 0.1 100
-0.01 10 000 0.01 10 000
-0.001 1 000 000 0.001 1 000 000
-0.0001 100 000 000 0.0001 100 000 000
This time, the value appears to be getting larger and larger as 𝑥 approaches 0 from both the left and the right. We
can then conclude that the one-sided limits are lim = +∞ and lim = +∞. Since the two one-sided limits
→ →
equal, we now conclude lim = +∞.
→
Another example:
𝑥
lim
→ 𝑥−1
𝒙 𝒙
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) =
𝒙−𝟏 𝒙−𝟏
0 -1 2 1
0.9 -9 1.1 11
0.99 -99 1.01 101
0.999 -999 1.001 1 001
0.9999 -9 999 1.0001 10 001
The one-sided limits are: lim = −∞ and lim = +∞. As the two limits don’t equal, the limit from both
→ →
sides does not exist.
lim lg 𝑥
→
10
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝒙 𝒇(𝒙) = 𝐥𝐠(𝒙)
1 0
10-10 -10
10-100 -100
10-1 000 -1 000
10-10 000 -10 000
The values seem to be decreasing and decreasing without bound as 𝑥 approaches 0 from the right. We can then
conclude that lim lg(𝑥) = −∞.
→
You’ll notice that from the left of , the graph of the function appears to be heading to +∞, while from the right
of , the graph appears to be heading to −∞ instead. This means lim tan(𝑥) = +∞, lim tan(𝑥) = −∞ and
→ →
For example:
lim 𝑥 + 2𝑥 + 3
→
11
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim 𝑥 − 𝑥 + 6
→
8 − 4𝑥
lim
→ 9𝑥 + 5𝑥
For rational functions, we look at the highest exponent of the denominator (not the numerator). So:
8 − 4𝑥 4
lim = −
7 → 9𝑥 + 5𝑥 9 Add 0 to 9 and subtract 4 from 0.
∎
And another more complicated example:
3𝑥 − 4𝑥 + 𝑥
lim
→ 1 − 2𝑥
12
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
3𝑥 − 4𝑥 − 𝑥
lim = +∞
7 → 1 − 2𝑥 = +∞, 𝑛 ≠ 0 or 𝑛 ≠ ±∞
∎
And one final complicated example:
𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 6
lim
→ 2𝑥 − 8𝑥
1 3 6
𝑥 − + Factor out the highest power of 𝑥 of the denominator, in this
2 lim 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥
→ 2 case 𝑥 .
𝑥 −8
𝑥
1 3 6
− +
lim 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥
3 → 2 Simplify the expression
−8
𝑥
1 3 6
lim − +
→ 𝑥 𝑥 𝑥
4 2 Theorem 6
lim −8
→ 𝑥
1 3 6
lim − lim − lim
5 → 𝑥 → 𝑥 → 𝑥 Theorem 4b
1
lim − lim 2
→ 𝑥 →
𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 6
lim = 0
6 → 2𝑥 − 8𝑥 lim = 0, and Theorems 1 and 3
→
∎
13
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Here are infinite limits and limits to infinity of common classes of functions.
1. Powers of x (Let 𝑛, 𝑞, 𝑟 ∈ ℤ (meaning 𝑛, 𝑞 and 𝑟 are all integers) where 𝑞 is an odd integer and 𝑟 is an
even integer)
a. Integer Powers of x
1 +∞ , 𝑛 > 0
lim 𝑥 = lim =
→ → 𝑥 0 , 𝑛<0
1 0 , 𝑛>0
lim 𝑥 = lim =
→ → 𝑥 +∞ , 𝑛<0
1 0 , 𝑛>0
lim 𝑥 = lim = +∞ , 𝑛 < 0 and is even
→ → 𝑥 −∞ , 𝑛 < 0 and is odd
b. Odd Roots of 𝑥
𝑛
+∞ , >0
1 𝑞
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑛
→ → √𝑥 0 , <0
𝑞
𝑛
⎧+∞ , 𝑞 > 0 and 𝑛 is even
1 ⎪ 𝑛
lim √𝑥 = lim = −∞ , > 0 and 𝑛 is odd
→ → √𝑥 ⎨ 𝑞
⎪ 0 , 𝑛<0
⎩ 𝑞
𝑛
0 , >0
1 𝑞
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑛
→ → √𝑥 +∞ , <0
𝑞
𝑛
⎧ 0 , >0
𝑞
1 ⎪ 𝑛
lim √𝑥 = lim = +∞ , < 0 and 𝑛 is even
→ → √𝑥 ⎨ 𝑞
⎪−∞ 𝑛
, < 0 and 𝑛 is odd
⎩ 𝑞
c. Even Roots of 𝑥
𝑛
1 +∞ , >0
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑟
𝑛
→ → √𝑥 0 , <0
𝑟
14
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑛
⎧ +∞ , > 0 and 𝑛 is even
1 ⎪ 𝑟
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑛
→ → √𝑥 ⎨ 0 , < 0 and 𝑛 is even
⎪ 𝑟
⎩does not exist , 𝑛 is odd
𝑛
1 >0 0 ,
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑟
𝑛
→ → √𝑥 +∞ , <0
𝑟
𝑛
⎧ 0 , > 0 and 𝑛 is even
1 ⎪ 𝑟
lim √𝑥 = lim = 𝑛
→ → √𝑥 ⎨ +∞ , < 0 and 𝑛 is even
⎪ 𝑟
⎩does not exist , 𝑛 is odd
2. Exponential Functions (Let 𝑎 ∈ ℝ (meaning 𝑎 is a real number))
1 +∞ , 𝑎 > 1
lim 𝑎 = lim =
→ → 𝑎 0 , 1>𝑎>0
1 0 , 𝑎>1
lim 𝑎 = lim =
→ → 𝑎 +∞ , 1 > 𝑎 > 0
3. Logarithmic Functions
1 +∞ , 𝑎 > 1
lim log (𝑥) = lim log =
→ → 𝑥 −∞ , 1 > 𝑎 > 0
1 −∞ , 𝑎 > 1
lim log (𝑥) = lim log =
→ → 𝑥 +∞ , 1 > 𝑎 > 0
More limits involving exponential functions, and logarithmic functions will be detailed in Module 11.
15
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
More limits involving inverse trigonometric functions will be detailed in Module 13.
Before we continue on, let’s define hyperbolic functions a bit. A hyperbolic function is defined similarly to a
trigonometric function, but instead of the function being defined on the unit circle 𝑥 + 𝑦 = 1, the function is
defined on the unit hyperbola 𝑥 − 𝑦 = 1. The two most basic hyperbolic functions are:
e −e e +e
sinh 𝑡 = and cosh 𝑡 =
2 2
Four other hyperbolic functions can be defined with the two basic hyperbolic functions above:
sinh 𝑡 e − e
tanh 𝑡 = =
cosh 𝑡 e + e
1 2
csch 𝑡 = =
sinh 𝑡 e − e
1 2
sech 𝑡 = =
cosh 𝑡 e + e
cosh 𝑡 e + e
coth 𝑡 = =
sinh 𝑡 e − e
Just as trigonometric functions have inverses, hyperbolic functions also have inverses (which measure the area
between the hyperbola and the line from the origin to a point on the hyperbola):
arsinh 𝑡 = ln 𝑡 + 𝑡 + 1
arcosh 𝑡 = ln 𝑡 + 𝑡 − 1
1 1+𝑡
artanh 𝑡 = ln
2 1−𝑡
1 1
arcsch 𝑡 = ln + +1
𝑡 𝑡
1 1
arsech 𝑡 = ln + −1
𝑡 𝑡
1 𝑡+1
arcoth 𝑡 = ln
2 𝑡−1
The proof of these definitions will be covered in a different set of modules dedicated to them.
6. Hyperbolic Functions
16
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
More limits involving inverse hyperbolic functions will be detailed in Module 15.
To make evaluating limits of these types easier, extend Theorem 9 (Limit of a Composition of Functions) to
include these cases:
1
lim = 0 and lim (𝑎 𝑥 + 𝑎 𝑥 + ⋯ + 𝑎 𝑥 + 𝑎 ) = lim 𝑎 𝑥
→± 𝑥 →± →±
lim 2 coth(𝑥 )
→
lim 𝑥 = 0
4 → Theorem 8
5
2 lim coth(𝑥) Theorem 9 (This time using lim 𝑓 𝑔(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥))
→ → →
17
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim 2 coth(𝑥 ) = +∞
7 →
Multiply 2 by +∞
∎
Now an inverse hyperbolic function:
lim artanh(2𝑥)
→
5
lim artanh(𝑥)
→
Theorem 9
lim artanh(2𝑥) = +∞
6 → lim artanh(𝑥) = +∞
→
∎
lim √𝑥
→
1 lim √𝑥 Given
→
2 lim 𝑥 Theorem 7b
→
3 √−∞ Theorem 2
lim √𝑥 = −∞
4 → Get the cube root of −∞
∎
Another limit to infinity of an odd root:
lim 𝑥
→
18
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
1 lim 𝑥 Given
→
2 lim 𝑥 Theorem 7b
→
lim 𝑥 = +∞
4 → Get the fifth root of +∞
∎
Then a limit to infinity of an even root:
lim 𝑥
→
There are actually two ways you can solve this limit:
1 lim 𝑥 Given
→
2 lim 𝑥 Theorem 7b
→
lim 𝑥 = +∞
4 → Get the square root of +∞
∎
1 lim 𝑥 Given
→
lim |𝑥|
2 → √𝑥 = |𝑥|
3 lim 𝑥 Theorem 9
→
4 |−∞| Theorem 2
lim 𝑥 = +∞
5 → Get the absolute value of −∞
∎
And another limit to infinity of an even root:
lim 𝑥
→
19
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
1 lim 𝑥 Given
→
2 lim 𝑥 Theorem 7b
→
lim e
→
2 e → Theorem 9
3 e → Theorem 3
−2 lim 𝑥 = −2(+∞) = −∞
4 → Theorem 2
5
lim e
→
Theorem 9
lim e = 0 0 , 𝑎>1
6 → lim 𝑎 =
+∞ , 1>𝑎>0
, e > 1, ∴ lim 𝑎 = 0
→ →
∎
lim 4 arctan(3𝑥)
→
3 lim 𝑥 = 3(+∞) = +∞
5 → Theorem 2
6
4 lim arctan(𝑥)
→
Theorem 9 again
𝜋
7 4 lim arctan(𝑥) =
2 →
20
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim 4 arctan(3𝑥) = 2𝜋
8 → Multiply 4 by
∎
Then let’s try a limit to infinity of a hyperbolic function.
lim tanh(4𝑥)
→
5
lim tanh(𝑥)
→
Theorem 9 again
lim tanh(4𝑥) = −1
6 → lim tanh(𝑥) = −1
→
∎
Finally, let’s try a limit to infinity of an inverse hyperbolic function.
lim − arsinh(−2𝑥)
→
−2 lim 𝑥 = −2(−∞) = +∞
5 → Theorem 2
6
− lim arsinh(𝑥)
→
Theorem 9 again
lim − arsinh(−2𝑥) = −∞
8 → Multiply +∞ by -1.
∎
21
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
SPECI AL LIMITS
Let us now apply what we learned in Modules 1 to 3 to derive some special limits. These limits, in turn, can be
used to derive other limits and derivatives (in a separate set of modules).
( )
1. lim
→
( )
2. lim
→
3. lim 1+
→±
4. lim(1 + 𝑟𝑥)
→
5. lim
→
6. lim
→
sin(𝑥)
lim
→ 𝑥
22
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝐵𝐶 = tan 𝜃 sin 𝜃
4 = tan 𝜃
cos 𝜃
5 ΔOAC ≤ Sector AOC ≤ ΔOCB Draw segment AC to define triangle OAC. From graph.
1
ΔOCB = (BC)(OC)
2
1 Area of triangle OCB. The base of the triangle is segment OC = 1
6 ΔOCB = (tan 𝜃)(1)
2 and the height of the triangle is segment BC = tan θ.
tan 𝜃
ΔOCB =
2
1
ΔOAC = (AD)(OC) Area of triangle OAC. The base of the triangle is segment OC = 1
2
7 sin 𝜃 and the height of the triangle is segment AD = sin θ.
ΔOAC =
2
1
Sector AOC = 𝑟 𝜃
2 Area of sector AOC, where r = 1.
8 𝜃
Sector AOC =
2
sin 𝜃 𝜃 tan 𝜃
9 ≤ ≤ From statements 5 to 8
2 2 2
10 sin 𝜃 ≤ 𝜃 ≤ tan 𝜃 Multiply all parts of the inequality by 2. True for all angles on QI.
6
lim 1 = 1 𝑎𝑛𝑑 lim cos(𝑥) = 1
→ →
Theorems 1 and 8
𝐬𝐢𝐧(𝒙)
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝟏
7 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 Theorem 10
∎
Next, let’s derive:
1 − cos(𝑥)
lim
→ 𝑥
23
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
sin 𝑥
3 lim 1 − cos (𝑥) = sin (𝑥)
→ 𝑥(1 + cos(𝑥))
sin(𝑥) sin(𝑥) ( ) ( )
4 lim ⋅ = ⋅
→ 𝑥 1 + cos(𝑥) ( ( )) ( )
sin(𝑥) sin(𝑥)
5 lim ⋅ lim Theorem 5 (Limit of a Product)
→ 𝑥 → 1 + cos(𝑥)
sin(𝑥) sin(𝑥)
6 lim lim =1
→ 1 + cos(𝑥) → 𝑥
lim sin(𝑥)
→
7 Theorem 6
lim[1 + cos(𝑥)]
→
lim sin(𝑥)
→
8 Theorem 4a
lim 1 + lim cos(𝑥)
→ →
0
9 Theorems 1 and 8
2
𝟏 − 𝐜𝐨𝐬(𝒙)
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝟎
10 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 0 divided by any number except 0 is 0.
∎
Now let’s derive:
𝑟
lim 1+
→± 𝑛
(𝑟𝑡) 1
lim 1 + lim 𝑟𝑡 + lim 1− +⋯
5 →± →± →± 2! 𝑛𝑡 Theorem 4a
24
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑥 𝑥
9 e =1+𝑥+ + +⋯
2! 3! Series expansion of e
(𝑟𝑡) (𝑟𝑡)
10 e = 1 + 𝑟𝑡 +
2!
+
3!
+ ⋯. Substitute 𝑥 with 𝑟𝑡
𝒓 𝒏𝒕
𝐥𝐢𝐦 𝟏 + = 𝐞𝒓𝒕
11 𝒏→± 𝒏 From statements 8 and 10.
∎
lim(1 + 𝑟𝑥)
→
𝑎 −1
lim
→ 𝑥
2 𝑦 =𝑎 −1 Let 𝑦 = 𝑎 − 1
25
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
ln 𝑎
lim
10 → log 𝑥 = 𝑦 log 𝑥
ln(1 + 𝑦)
lim ln 𝑎
→
11 Theorem 6
lim ln(1 + 𝑦)
→
ln 𝑎
12 ln lim (1 + 𝑦) Theorems 1 and 9
→
ln 𝑎
13 ln e lim(1 + 𝑦) = e
→
𝒂𝒙 − 𝟏
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝐥𝐧 𝒂
14 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 ln e = 1
∎
Finally, let’s derive:
e −1
lim
→ 𝑥
e −1 𝑎 −1
2 lim
→ 𝑥
= ln e lim = ln 𝑎 where 𝑎 = e
→ 𝑥
𝐞𝒙 − 𝟏
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝟏
3 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 ln e = 1
∎
26
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
( )
1. lim
→
( )
2. lim
→
Let’s derive:
sinh(𝑥)
lim
→ 𝑥
𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐡(𝒙)
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝟏
10 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 Multiply by 2
∎
Now let’s derive:
1 − cosh(𝑥)
lim
→ 𝑥
27
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
1 − cosh(𝑥) 1 e −1 1 e −1
7 lim
→ 𝑥
=
2
− lim
→ 𝑥
+ lim
→ e
lim
→ 𝑥 Theorem 5
1 − cosh(𝑥) 1
8 lim
→ 𝑥
= (−1 + 1)
2 e = 1 and lim =1
→
1 − cosh(𝑥) 1
9 lim
→ 𝑥
= (0)
2 Add 1 to -1
𝟏 − 𝐜𝐨𝐬𝐡(𝒙)
𝐥𝐢𝐦 = 𝟎
10 𝒙→𝟎 𝒙 Multiply by 0
∎
First, let’s try combining a limit we learned in Module 4 with a limit theorem from Module 1:
sin 3𝑥
lim
→ 𝑥
3(1) sin(ℎ)
4 lim =1
→ ℎ
sin(3𝑥)
5 lim = 3 Multiply 3 by 1
→ 𝑥
28
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
2 sin (𝑥)
lim
→ 𝑥
29
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
2 sin (𝑥)
lim = 0
5 → 𝑥 Multiply 2 by 0 and 1
∎
2(0) 1 − cos(ℎ)
7 lim =0
→ ℎ
2 sin (𝑥)
lim = 0
8 → 𝑥 Multiply 2 by 0
∎
30
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
2(0) 1 − cos(ℎ)
6 lim =0
→ ℎ
2 sin (𝑥)
lim = 0
7 → 𝑥 Multiply 2 by 0
∎
See, we used three methods, and we got the same answer each time. This shows that in finding limits, multiple
methods are possible. Just choose what is easiest for you.
2 sin(𝑥) cos(𝑥)
lim
→ 2𝑥
sin(𝑥)
3 lim cos(𝑥) ⋅ lim
→ → 𝑥 Theorem 5
( )
4 (1)(1) lim = 1 and Theorem 8
→
2 sin(𝑥) cos(𝑥)
lim = 1
5 → 2𝑥 Multiply 1 by 1
∎
2 sin(𝑥) cos(𝑥)
lim = 1 sin(ℎ)
3 → 2𝑥 lim =1
→ ℎ
∎
31
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Yes, even here. We have used two methods and got the same answer each time.
4
lim 2+
→ 𝑛
4
lim 2+ = 2𝑒 𝑟
4 → 𝑛 lim 1+ =e
→± 𝑛
∎
10 −1
lim
→ 𝑥
2(10 − 1)
2 lim
→ 2𝑥 Multiply the numerator and denominator by 2
10 − 1
3 2 lim Theorem 3
→ 2𝑥
10 −1 𝑎 −1
lim = 2 ln 10 𝑜𝑟 ln 100 lim = ln 𝑎
4 → 𝑥 → ℎ
∎ Optional: 𝑦 log 𝑥 = log 𝑥 and 10 = 100
Limits have applications in the real world as well. They can be applied in chemistry, engineering, and even in
business or finance.
32
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
A glass beaker has 100 mL of pure water. 6M hydrochloric acid or hydrochloric acid containing 6 mol/L or 216 g/L,
(as 1 mole of hydrogen chloride is 36 g) is being poured into the beaker at a rate of 4 mL per second.
1. Express the concentration of hydrochloric acid 𝐶(𝑡) after 𝑡 minutes in moles per liter.
2. What is the long-term concentration of salt, or lim 𝐶(𝑡) in moles per liter?
→
Now, let’s start by getting the function modelled here. The molar concentration 𝑀(𝑡) in M of a solution is:
0.024 ⋅ 𝑡
𝑀(𝑡) = M
0.1 + 0.004𝑡 Multiply 6 by 0.004
or Optional: Multiply the numerator and the denominator by 250
3
6𝑡
𝑀(𝑡) = M
25 + 𝑡 Don’t forget the units
∎
Then, let’s get the long-term concentration by getting the limit as 𝑡 approaches +∞ in the function:
lim 𝑀(𝑡) = 6 M
6 →
Add 0 and 1, then divide 6 by the sum. Don’t forget the units.
∎
33
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Well, well, well, we’re back to where we started. As we keep pouring that 6M hydrochloric acid into the beaker
(assuming it doesn’t overflow), the concentration of the solution starts to get closer and closer to the
concentration of the original substance, in this case 6M or 6 mol/L or 216 g/L.
Compound interest is where the interest is compounded n times for every year t at an annual rate r. Its formula is:
𝑟
𝐴=𝑃 1+
𝑛
Using the formula above, derive the formula for continuous compounding (or where n becomes infinite).
𝐴 = 𝑃e 𝑟
4 lim 1+ =e
∎ → 𝑛
Now we’ve found the formula for continuous compounding. Formulas in business math are independent of the
unit of currency used.
Five separate bank transactions occurred at the same time in different parts of the world. All five involve 10,000 of
their local currency and a 5% interest rate. In India, Amir deposited his rupees in a bank that compounds daily (365
days). In the Philippines, Belle deposited her pesos in a bank that compounds monthly. In France, Clair deposited
her euros in a bank that compounds annually. In the United States, David deposited his dollars in a bank that
compounds quarterly. In Japan, Eri deposited her yen in a bank that compounds continuously.
1. Who among these five would have the highest amount in their local currency after 10 years? Round off
rupees, pesos, euros, and dollars to the nearest hundredth or 2 decimal places, but round yen to the
nearest unit or whole number.
2. If you compare the local currencies, who has the highest amount in terms of Philippine pesos? (Assume
these Forex rates: 1 rupee is 0.66 pesos, 1 euro = 57 pesos, 1 dollar= 50 pesos, 1 yen= 0.47 pesos)
34
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝐴 >𝐴 >𝐴 >𝐴 >𝐴 Comparing their local currencies, it appears Eri came out
8 with the most in her local currency and Clair came out with
∎ the least in her local currency.
Since Belle’s deposit is already in Philippine pesos, her final value is 16,470.09 pesos. Converting the other four to
Philippine pesos: Amir’s final value is 10,811.19 pesos; Clair’s final value is 928,469.94 pesos; David’s final value is
821,809.73; and Eri’s final value is 7,748.99. It turns out, Clair came out with the most overall while Eri came out
with the least.
35
CHAPTER 2 CONTINUITY
CONTINUITY AT A NUMBER
Limits can also be used to see if a number is continuous at a certain number or a point.
1. 𝑓(𝑎) exists
2. lim 𝑓(𝑥) exists
→
3. lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑎)
→
If even one of these conditions is not satisfied, the function is discontinuous at that number.
That third condition seems familiar, doesn’t it? Yes. That condition forms part of Theorem 8 that was shown back
in Module 1. To recap, here’s Theorem 8 or the Substitution Theorem: If 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑎, then
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑎). The converse of this statement would be: If lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑎), then 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑎. This
→ →
is under the assumption that the first two conditions hold true.
𝑥 − 4𝑥 + 3
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥−1
lim[𝑥 − 4𝑥 + 3]
→
6 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Theorem 6
→ lim[𝑥 − 1]
→
36
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
(0) − 4(0) + 3
8 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Theorems 2 and 7a
→ (0) − 1
3
9 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Square 0 and multiply 4 by 0
→ −1
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −3
10 → Divide 3 by -1. Condition 2 is satisfied.
?
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(0)
→
−3 = −3
11 Condition 3 is satisfied, so the function is continuous at 𝑥 = 0
∴ 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑥 = 0
∎
Now let’s try condition B: 𝑥 = 3
lim[𝑥 − 4𝑥 + 3]
→
6 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Theorem 6
→ lim[𝑥 − 1]
→
lim 𝑥 − 4 lim 𝑥 + 3
→ →
7 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Theorems 1, 3, and 4b
→ lim 𝑥 − 1
→
(3) − 4(3) + 3
8 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Theorems 2 and 7a
→ (3) − 1
0
9 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = Square 3 and multiply 4 by 3
→ −2
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 0
10 → Divide 0 by -2. Condition 2 is satisfied.
?
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(3)
→
0=0
11 Condition 3 is satisfied, so the function is continuous at 𝑥 = 0
∴ 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑥 = 3
∎
37
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
3𝑥 + 1 , 𝑥≤1
𝑓(𝑥) = at 𝑥 = 1
−4𝑥 + 3 , 𝑥>1
3 lim 𝑥 + 1 = 3(1) + 1 = 4
→ Theorems 1, 2, 3, and 4. Since the limits aren’t equal, condition
5 −4 lim 𝑥 + 3 = −4(1) + 3 = −1
→ 2 fails.
∴ 𝑓(𝑥) is not continuous at 𝑥 = 1 Because condition 2 failed, condition 3 also fails. Therefore, the
6
∎ function is not continuous at 𝑥 = 1
38
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Don’t let piecewise functions fool you. They could actually be continuous. Here’s another example:
8𝑥 + 10𝑥 − 12 , 𝑥 ≥ −3
𝑓(𝑥) =
−7𝑥 + 9 , 𝑥 < −3
𝑓(−3) = 8(−3) + 10(−3) − 12 Substitute 𝑥 = −3 into 8𝑥 + 10𝑥 − 12, as this is the part of
2
the function defined at 𝑥 = −3
8 lim 𝑥 + 10 lim 𝑥 − 12
→ →
= 8(−3) + 10(−3) − 12
= 72 − 30 − 12 = 30 Theorems 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8/7a. Both one-sided limits equal, so
6
condition 2 is satisfied.
−7 lim 𝑥 + 9 = −7(−3) + 9
→
21 + 9 = 30
?
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(−3)
→
Generally, a function is continuous at every number in its domain. Some particular examples include:
1. A polynomial function is continuous at every real number, or, simply put, continuous everywhere.
2. A rational function is continuous at every number in its domain.
3. A square root is continuous at every number in its domain.
We can then extend the conditions for continuity of functions to determine the continuity of composite functions
such as sin(𝑥 ) and e . The conditions such that 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥) is continuous are similar to continuity at a number,
and are as follows:
1. lim 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑀
→
2. 𝑓(𝑀) is defined
39
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
That last statement looks similar to Theorem 9, doesn’t it? To recap, here’s Theorem 9: If 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at
lim 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑀, then lim 𝑓 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑓 lim 𝑔(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑀).
→ → → →
There are multiple methods of doing this. Since we know that a polynomial function is continuous everywhere, we
can either start with the composition of the function, or we can start by getting the limit of the inner function.
?
lim 𝑓 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑓 𝑔(2)
→
1 1
= The last condition is satisfied, so, the function is continuous at
9 4 4
𝑥=2
∴ 𝑓 𝑔(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑥 = 2
∎
40
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
∎
Now let’s try a trigonometric function this time:
Given 𝑤(𝑥) = 𝑣(𝑢(𝑥)), 𝑢(𝑥) = 𝑥 + , and 𝑣(𝑥) = cos(𝑥), determine if 𝑤(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑥 = √𝜋
We’ll start by getting the limit of the inner function this time.
41
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
4𝜋
lim 𝑤(𝑥) = lim 𝑣(𝑥) = cos Theorem 8
9 →√ → 3
1
lim 𝑤(𝑥) = lim 𝑣(𝑥) = − = − . lim 𝑤(𝑥) = lim 𝑣(𝑥) exists.
10 →√ → 2 cos
→ →
?
lim 𝑤(𝑥) = 𝑤 √𝜋
→√
1 1
− =− The last condition is satisfied, so, the function is continuous at
11 2 2
𝑥 = √𝜋
∴ 𝑤(𝑥) is continuous at 𝑥 = √𝜋
∎
42
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Sometimes, one number is not enough to show that a function is continuous or not. A function 𝑓(𝑥) is
continuous on an open interval (𝑎, 𝑏) if it is continuous at every point on that interval.
𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑥 + 3, (3, 6)
Since a polynomial function is continuous everywhere, the function is continuous over the given interval.
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 12
𝑓(𝑥) = , (1, 4)
𝑥−2
The rational function is not continuous at 𝑥 = 2, so the function is not continuous over the given interval.
This can also apply to a half-open interval such as [𝑎, 𝑏) or (𝑎, 𝑏], but only two of the three conditions above need
to be satisfied [Specifically, conditions 1 and 2 for [𝑎, 𝑏) and conditions 1 and 3 for (𝑎, 𝑏] need to be satisfied].
𝑓(𝑥) = 36 − 𝑥 , [−6, 6]
43
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Now let’s test each endpoint to see if it’s continuous there as well.
∴ 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous over [−6, 6] Since all three conditions were satisfied, the function is
5
∎ continuous over the interval
Now, let’s try a half-open interval. Determine if the function is continuous over the given interval:
𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 2
𝑓(𝑥) = , [2, +∞)
𝑥−1
𝑥 − 3𝑥 + 2
1 𝑓(𝑥) = , [2, +∞) Given
𝑥−1
(2) − 3(2) + 2 0
= 0 The function is continuous over the interval
(2, +∞), so we
2 𝑓(2) = =
(2) − 1 1 then see if 𝑓(2) is defined.
4−6+2 0
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = = =0
→ 2−1 1 We then get the limits as x approaches 2 from the right and get
3 the limit to positive infinity (it is automatically a one-sided limit,
+∞ as mentioned in Module 3)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = = +∞
→ 1
?
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(2)
→
0=0 We then check if lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑎). All necessary conditions
4 →
∴ 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous over [2, +∞) were satisfied.
44
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
DISCONTINUITIES
In the previous two modules, we checked if a function is continuous either at a given number or over a given
interval. We also encountered some discontinuous functions along the way. These discontinuities come in two
types and five forms:
1. Removable Discontinuities- as their name says, these functions can be made continuous by redefining
the function to remove the discontinuity. In this type of discontinuity, lim 𝑓(𝑥) exists, but does not equal
→
𝑓(𝑎).
a. Hole/Missing Point Discontinuity- The function is not defined at a single point or has a
“hole” at that point. This commonly happens with rational functions. In cases such as these,
lim 𝑓(𝑥) exists, but 𝑓(𝑎) is an indeterminate form.
→
b. Isolated Point Discontinuity- The function is a piecewise function where one part of the
function has a “hole”, but some other part has defined a function/constant where the point
would be, but the value does not match the limit from both sides. Simply put, lim 𝑓(𝑥) exists,
→
and 𝑓(𝑎) is defined, but lim 𝑓(𝑥) ≠ 𝑓(𝑎).
→
2. Non-Removable Discontinuities- these functions cannot be made continuous at all. This happens
whenever limits from both sides do not exist.
a. Jump Discontinuity- In this type of discontinuity, lim 𝑓(𝑥) and lim 𝑓(𝑥) both exist, but
→ →
lim 𝑓(𝑥) ≠ lim 𝑓(𝑥), so lim 𝑓(𝑥) does not exist.
→ → →
b. Infinite Discontinuity- At least one of the limits of the function at the point 𝑎 is ±∞.
c. Oscillating Discontinuity- The function seems to oscillate between two infinite quantities, such
as with cos or sin at 𝑥 = 0.
Determine the type of discontinuity in this function. If the discontinuity is removable, redefine the function to
make it continuous:
𝑥 − 6𝑥 + 11𝑥 − 6
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥−1
45
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑥 − 6𝑥 + 11𝑥 − 6
𝑓(𝑥) = ,𝑥 ≠ 1
𝑥−1
11 −2 ,𝑥 = 1 Use the limit to redefine the function to make it continuous.
∎
Determine the type of discontinuity in this function. If the discontinuity is removable, redefine the function to
make it continuous:
|𝑥 − 2| , 𝑥≠2
𝑢(𝑥) =
1 , 𝑥=2
lim 𝑢(𝑥) = lim|𝑥 − 2| Since we are asked to redefine the function, get the limit of the
3 → →
function as x approaches 2
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 15
𝑓(𝑥) = , 𝑥≠5
𝑥−5
2 , 𝑥=5
46
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Possible isolated point discontinuity at From the boundary point of the function, we see that there is a
2 𝑥=5 possible discontinuity at x = 5.
𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 15 Since we are asked to redefine the function, get the limit of the
3 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥−5 function as x approaches 5
0 If we directly substitute 5 into the function, we get an
4 𝑓(5) =
0 indeterminate form
(𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 5)
5 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥−5 Factor (𝑥 − 8𝑥 + 15)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑥 − 3
6 → → Cancel an 𝑥 − 5
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 5 − 3 = 2 Theorems 1, 2, and 4. The limit equals the other part of the
7 →
function.
No discontinuity
8 The function is continuous, and there is no discontinuity.
∎
5 − 2𝑥 , 𝑥<1
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥−2 , 𝑥≥1
Possible jump discontinuity at 𝑥 = 1 From the boundary point of the function, we see that there is a
2
possible discontinuity at x = 1.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 5 − 2(1) = 3
→
3 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = (1) − 2 = −1 We get the one-sided limits to confirm if this is the case.
→
Jump discontinuity at 𝑥 = 1 From statement 3, the one-sided limits do not equal, confirming
4
∎ the jump discontinuity’s presence.
𝑥+4 , 𝑥<4
𝑓(𝑥) =
2𝑥 , 𝑥≥4
47
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Possible jump discontinuity at 𝑥 = 4 From the boundary point of the function, we see that there is a
2
possible discontinuity at x = 4.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = (4) + 4 = 8
→
3 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 2(4) = 8 We get the one-sided limits to confirm if this is the case.
→
No discontinuity From statement 3, the one-sided limits are equal, confirming the
4
∎ function’s continuity, or that the function has no discontinuity.
Determine the type of discontinuity in this function:
𝑥+4
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥−4
(4) + 4 8
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = =
→ (4) − 4 0
6 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ Theorems 1, 2, and 4
→
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞
→
𝜋
𝑓(𝑥) = sin
4𝑥
48
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Oscillating discontinuity at 𝑥 = 0
4 From statement 3 above.
∎
1
𝑓(𝑥) = tanh
𝑥
49
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim tanh(𝑥)
→
6 lim tanh(𝑥) Theorem 9
→
1
lim tanh = lim tanh(𝑥) = −1
→ 𝑥 →
lim tanh(𝑥) = −1 and lim tanh(𝑥) = 1.
7 1 → →
lim tanh = lim tanh(𝑥) = 1
→ 𝑥 →
Jump discontinuity at 𝑥 = 0 From statement 7, the one-sided limits exist but do not equal,
8
∎ so the discontinuity at x = 0 is a jump discontinuity.
This example shows that jump discontinuities can happen at functions which are not piecewise functions, such as
the hyperbolic tangent above. Let’s try another example below:
|𝑥|
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥
This is the graph of the function. From the left of 0, the function
4 approaches -1. From the right of 0, the function approaches 1.
The limit from both sides does not exist.
Jump discontinuity at 𝑥 = 0 From statement 7, the one-sided limits exist but do not equal,
8
∎ so the discontinuity at x = 0 is a jump discontinuity.
50
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
MULTIPLE DISCONTINUITIES
A function can have discontinuities at multiple points in the function. For example, a function can have both a
removable and an infinite discontinuity, or multiple jump discontinuities. This can happen with rational functions
and other types of functions.
𝑥 − 13𝑥 + 46𝑥 − 48
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24
𝑥 − 13𝑥 + 46𝑥 − 48
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24 Get the limits from both sides as x approaches 3 and as x
4 𝑥 − 13𝑥 + 46𝑥 − 48
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim approaches 8.
→ → 𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24
(𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → (𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8)
5 (𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8) Factor the denominator and the numerator.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → (𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim (𝑥 − 2)
→ →
6 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim (𝑥 − 2) Cancel an x-3 and an x-8
→ →
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 3 − 2 = 1
→
7 lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 8 − 2 = 6 Theorems 1, 2, and 4
→
Hole/Removable discontinuities at 𝑥 =
3 and at 𝑥 = 8 The limits from both sides exist at both x = 3 and x = 8, so the
8
function has two removable discontinuities.
∎
Determine the type(s) of discontinuity of this function:
𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 26𝑥 − 24
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24
51
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 26𝑥 − 24
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24 Get the limits from both sides as x approaches 3 and as x
4 𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 26𝑥 − 24
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim approaches 8.
→ → 𝑥 − 11𝑥 + 24
(𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 4)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → (𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8)
5 (𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 4) Factor the denominator and the numerator.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → (𝑥 − 3)(𝑥 − 8)
(𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 4)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥−8
6 (𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 4) Cancel an x-3
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim
→ → 𝑥−8
lim (𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 4)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = →
→ lim (𝑥 − 8)
→
7 lim (𝑥 − 2)(𝑥 − 4) Theorem 6
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = →
→ lim (𝑥 − 8)
→
lim (𝑥 − 2) ⋅ lim (𝑥 − 4)
→ →
lim 𝑓(𝑥) =
→ lim (𝑥 − 8)
→
8 lim (𝑥 − 2) ⋅ lim (𝑥 − 4) Theorem 5
→ →
lim 𝑓(𝑥) =
→ lim (𝑥 − 8)
→
(3 − 2) ⋅ (3 − 4)
lim 𝑓(𝑥) =
→ (3 − 8)
9 (8 − 2) ⋅ (8 − 4) Theorems 1, 2, and 4
lim 𝑓(𝑥) =
→ (8 − 8)
−1 1
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = = Subtract 2, 4, and 8 from 3 and subtract 2, 4, and 8 from 8.
→ −5 5
10 24
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = = ±∞ lim = ±∞
→ 0 →
CONTINUITY PROBLEMS
Piecewise functions don’t always need to be discontinuous, as we saw with some examples in Module 8. This only
happens if the limits of both parts of the function are equal as x approaches that boundary. Note that this can only
happen with removable discontinuities, as non-removable discontinuities cannot be redefined at all.
52
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Here’s an example:
𝑥 −1 , 𝑥<2
𝑓(𝑥) =
𝑥+𝑘 , 𝑥≥2
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑥 − 1 Get the left-hand limit of the complete part of the function as x
2 → →
approaches 2 (as this part is defined for values less than 2).
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = (2) − 1
3 → Theorems 1, 4 and 8/7a.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 4 − 1 = 3
4 → Square 4 and subtract 1
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 3 For the function to be continuous, the limit from the right must
→
5 𝑓(2) = 3 also equal to 3, and the function must equal 3 at x = 2.
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = lim 𝑥 + 𝑘 Get the right-hand limit of the incomplete part of the function
→ →
6 𝑓(2) = 2 + 𝑘 as x approaches 2 (as this part is defined for values greater than
or equal to 2)
𝑥 −1 , 𝑥<2
𝑓(𝑥) =
9 𝑥+1 , 𝑥≥2 This function is continuous at x = 2.
∎
𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 14
𝑓(𝑥) = , 𝑥≠7
𝑥−7
𝑘 , 𝑥=7
53
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑥 − 9𝑥 + 14
𝑓(𝑥) = , 𝑥≠7
𝑥−7
9 5 , 𝑥=7 This function is continuous at x = 7.
54
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
One application of continuity is determining if the function passes a certain number at one point. The intermediate
value theorem states that if the function 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous on the closed interval [𝑎, 𝑏] and 𝑓(𝑎) ≠ 𝑓(𝑏), then
for every number 𝑑 between 𝑓(𝑎) and 𝑓(𝑏), there exists a number 𝑐 such that 𝑎 < 𝑐 < 𝑏 and 𝑓(𝑐) = 𝑑.
This will neither tell you the exact values of 𝑐 where the function will equal 𝑑, nor exclude a value from being
taken by a function, nor will it determine how many times the function takes on a specific value.
0 < 9 < 16
9 is between 0 and 16. By the intermediate value theorem, the
4 ∴ 𝑓(−2) < 𝑓(𝑐) < 𝑓(2)
function will equal 9 at a certain value 𝑐 within the interval.
∎
Note: As the base of log 𝑥 may differ between resources, I’ll use ln 𝑥 = log 𝑥, and lg 𝑥 = log 𝑥
This theorem states that a function will have an absolute minimum or absolute maximum within the interval [𝑎, 𝑏].
This will be discussed in more detail in the Derivatives set of modules.
55
CHAPTER 3 MORE LIMITS
The limits in Modules 11 to 15 extend the limits found in Module 3, while Module 16 details the proof of the limits
in Module 1 and the two useful facts in Module 3.
Aside from the infinite limits and limits to infinity found in Module 3, here are more useful limits involving
exponential and logarithmic functions (Let 𝑎 ∈ ℝ, meaning 𝑎 is a real number):
1
lim 𝑎 = lim = 1, 𝑎 ≠ 0 or 𝑎 ≠ ±∞
→ → 𝑎
1
lim log (𝑥) = lim log =0
→ → 𝑥
Evaluate:
1
lim
→ 2
1
2 Theorem 9
2 →
1
3 2( ) Theorems 1, 2, and 4
1
4 2 Subtract 3 from 3
1
lim = 1
5 → 2 𝑎 = 1, 𝑎 ≠ 0 or 𝑎 ≠ ±∞
∎
Evaluate:
lim ln(4𝑥 − 3)
→
2 ln lim(4𝑥 − 3) Theorem 9
→
56
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim ln(4𝑥 − 3) = 0
5 →
log 1 = 0
∎
Evaluate:
1
lim
→ e
1
2 Theorem 9
e →
1
3 e Theorem 2
1
lim = 1
4 → e 𝑎 = 1, 𝑎 ≠ 0 or 𝑎 ≠ ±∞
∎
Evaluate:
lim log 𝑥
→
3 log 1 Theorem 2
57
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Here, we can finally get some useful limits for sine and cosine functions and get some more useful limits for the
other four trigonometric functions. Let 𝑘 ∈ ℤ
Recall that the period of the sine, cosine, cosecant, and secant functions is 2π, while the period of the tangent and
cotangent functions is π.
lim sin(2𝑥)
→
2 lim 𝑥 = 2𝜋
4 → Theorem 2
lim sin(𝑥)
5 → Theorem 9
lim sin(2𝑥) = 0
6 → lim sin(𝑥) = 0 where 𝑘 = 2
→
∎
58
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Evaluate:
𝜋
lim cos −𝑥
→ 2
There are two ways we can go about this: Either we use theorem 9, or we use the co-function identity
cos − 𝑥 = sin(𝑥). Let’s use Theorem 9 here.
𝜋
2 cos lim −𝑥 Theorem 9
→ 2
𝜋
3 cos − lim 𝑥 Theorems 1 and 4
2 →
𝜋 𝜋 𝜋
− lim 𝑥 = − = 0
4 2 → 2 2 Theorem 2
lim cos(𝑥)
5 → Theorem 9
𝜋
lim cos −𝑥 = 1
6 → 2 lim cos(𝑥) = 1 where 𝑘 = 0
→
∎
lim sin(𝑥) 𝜋
2 → cos − 𝑥 = sin(𝑥)
2
𝜋
3 sin Theorem 8
2
𝜋
lim cos −𝑥 = 1
4 → 2 lim sin(𝑥) = 1 where 𝑘 = 0
→
∎
59
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝜋
lim arcsin(𝑥) = lim arccsc(𝑥) =
→ → 2
𝜋
lim arcsin(𝑥) = lim arccsc(𝑥) = −
→ → 2
𝜋
lim arctan(𝑥) = lim arccot(𝑥) =
→ → 4
𝜋
lim arctan(𝑥) = lim arccot(𝑥) = −
→ → 4
2
lim arcsin
→ 𝑥
There are two ways we could go about this: We can do direct substitution, or we can use arcsin = arccsc(𝑥).
Let’s use direct evaluation first.
60
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim arctan(𝑥 + 1)
→
lim 𝑥 + 1 = 0 + 1 = 1
3 → Theorems 1, 2, and 4
lim arctan(𝑥)
4 → Theorem 9
𝜋
lim arctan(𝑥 + 1) = 𝜋
5 → 4 lim arctan(𝑥) =
→ 4
∎
61
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim tanh(𝑥) = 0
→
lim cosh(1 − 𝑥)
→
lim 1 − 𝑥 = 1 − lim 𝑥 = 1 − 1 = 0
3 → → Theorems 1, 2, and 4
lim cosh(𝑥)
4 → Theorem 9
lim cosh(1 − 𝑥) = 1
5 → lim cosh(𝑥) = 1
→
∎
Evaluate:
𝑥
lim sinh
→ √ 2
62
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑥 → ln √2 + 1
𝑥 → ln √2 + 1
lim sinh(𝑥)
5 → √ Theorem 9
𝑥
lim sinh = 1
6 → √ 2 lim sinh(𝑥) = 1
→ √
∎
Evaluate:
lim tanh(𝑥 + 1)
→
lim 𝑥 + 1 = lim 𝑥 + 1 = −1 + 1 = 0
3 → → Theorems 1, 2, and 4
lim tanh(𝑥)
4 → Theorem 9
lim tanh(𝑥 + 1) = 0
5 → lim tanh(𝑥) = 0
→
∎
63
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Evaluate:
lim arsinh(𝑥 − 1)
→
lim 𝑥 − 1 = lim 𝑥 − 1 = 2 − 1 = 1
3 → → Theorems 1, 2, and 4
lim arsinh(𝑥)
4 → Theorem 9
lim arsinh(𝑥 − 1) = ln √2 + 1
5 → lim arsinh(𝑥) = ln √2 + 1
→
∎
Evaluate:
lim arcosh(2𝑥)
→
1+
lim 2𝑥 = 2 lim 𝑥 = 2 = 1+
3 → →
2 Theorems 2 and 3
lim arcosh(𝑥)
4 → Theorem 9
lim arcosh(2𝑥) = 0
5 → lim arcosh(𝑥) = 0
→
∎
64
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Here, we will use a more formal definition of a limit to prove the limit properties. This limit is known as the
epsilon-delta or (ε, δ) definition of a limit and is as follows:
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 if and only if for all 𝜀 > 0, there exists a 𝛿 > 0 such that |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀 if 0 < |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿.
→
The symbol ⇔ means “if and only if”, the symbol ∀ means “for all”, the ∃ means “there exists”, 𝑠. 𝑡. means “such
that”, and → means “if”. Note that 0 < |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿 came first in the symbolic definition, but last in the worded
definition. This is because this is the condition to be satisfied so we could say that the limit exists.
0 < |𝑥 − 3| < 𝛿 = 𝜀 Take the second part of statement 2. From statement 4, assume
5
δ=ε
∴ lim 𝑥 + 5 = 8
8 →
From statement 2
∎
Let’s try another example: Prove lim 𝑥 = 16 using the (ε, δ) definition of the limit
→
65
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
|𝑥 − 16| = |𝑥 − 4||𝑥 + 4| Assume the second part of statement 2 is true and equate to
11
statement 5.
∴ lim 𝑥 = 16
15 →
From statement 2
∎
lim 𝑐 = 𝑐
→
66
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim 𝑐 = 𝑐
7 →
From statement 2
∎
7 |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝜀 Since δ = ε
lim 𝑥 = 𝑎
8 →
From statement 2
∎
67
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
|𝑐𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑐𝐿| = |𝑐||𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| Assume the second part of statement 2 is true and equate to
7
statement 5
𝜀
8 |𝑐𝑓(𝑥) − 𝑐𝐿| < |𝑐| From statement 6
|𝑐|
lim 𝑐𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑐𝐿
10 →
From statement 2
∎
Here, we will have to split each part of Theorem 4 by proving the limit of a sum then using that limit to prove the
limit of a difference.
10 𝑓(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥) − (𝐿 + 𝑀) = |(𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿) + (𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀)| Assume the second part of statement 2 is true
and equate to statement 5
11 𝑓(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥) − (𝐿 + 𝑀) ≤ |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| + |𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀| Use the triangle inequality |𝑎 + 𝑏| ≤ |𝑎| + |𝑏|
𝜀 𝜀
12 𝑓(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥) − (𝐿 + 𝑀) < + From statements 8 and 9
2 2
68
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
4 |(𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿)(𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀)| < 𝜀 Take the first part of statement 3 and remove -0.
|(𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿)(𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀) − 0| = |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿||𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀| Assume the second part of statement 3 is true and
9
equate to statement 5
69
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) = [𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿][𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀] + 𝑀𝑓(𝑥) + 𝐿𝑔(𝑥) − 𝐿𝑀 Add 𝑀𝑓(𝑥) and 𝐿𝑔(𝑥) to both sides and subtract
14
𝐿𝑀 from both sides
lim 𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) = lim ([𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿][𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀] + 𝑀𝑓(𝑥) +
15 Get the limits of both sides as 𝑥 approaches 𝑎
→ →
𝐿𝑔(𝑥) − 𝐿𝑀)
lim 𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥) = lim([𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿][𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀]) + lim 𝑀𝑓(𝑥) +
→ → →
16 lim 𝐿𝑔(𝑥) − lim 𝐿𝑀 Theorem 4
→ →
18 lim [𝑓(𝑥)𝑔(𝑥)] = 𝐿𝑀
→
Add LM to LM, subtract LM from 2LM.
∎
1 1
2 lim 𝑓(𝑥) ⋅ = 𝐿 ⋅ ,𝑀 ≠ 0 Rewrite the fraction as a product and use Theorem 5
→ 𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀
1 1
3 lim = ,𝑀 ≠ 0 Divide both sides by lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿
→ 𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀 →
1 1
− <𝜀
4 𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀 From the (ε, δ) definition of a limit based on statement 3.
0 < |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿
1 1
5 − <𝜀 Take the first part of statement 4
𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀
𝑀 − 𝑔(𝑥)
6 <𝜀 Subtract from
𝑀𝑔(𝑥) ( )
|𝑀 − 𝑔(𝑥)| 𝑎 |𝑎|
7 <𝜀 =
|𝑀𝑔(𝑥)| 𝑏 |𝑏|
|𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀|
8 <𝜀 |𝑀 − 𝑔(𝑥)| = |𝑔(𝑥) − 𝑀|
|𝑀𝑔(𝑥)|
70
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
10 |𝑀| = |𝑀 − 𝑔(𝑥) + 𝑔(𝑥)| Assume the second part of statement 4 is true and rewrite |𝑀|
1 1 2 |𝑀| | |
20 −
𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀
<
|𝑀| 2
𝜀 Multiply | |
by | |
and the product by 𝜀
1 1
21 lim = ,𝑀 ≠ 0 From statement 4
→ 𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀
𝑓(𝑥) 𝐿
lim = ,𝑀 ≠ 0
22 → 𝑔(𝑥) 𝑀 Use Theorem 5 to multiply both sides by lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿
→
∎
These two limits are usually discussed separately in a Basic Calculus course, but they are combined here because a
radical or root can be written as an exponent or power. This fact will come in handy later on, as we first prove
the limit of the power, then use that to prove the limit of a radical.
71
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
lim [𝑓(𝑥)] = 𝐿
→
lim [𝑓(𝑥)] = 𝐿
4 →
From statement 2
∎
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = √𝐿
→
lim 𝑓(𝑥) = √𝐿
5 → Rewrite the rational power as a root
∎
72
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
If 𝑓(𝑥) is continuous at lim 𝑔(𝑥) = 𝑀, then lim 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥)) = 𝑓 lim 𝑔(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑀).
→ → → →
5 then lim 𝑓(𝑔(𝑥)) = 𝑓 lim 𝑔(𝑥) = lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝑓(𝑀). From statements 2 to 4
→ → →
73
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Left-hand limit: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 if and only if for all 𝜀 > 0, there exists a 𝛿 > 0 such that |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀 if − 𝛿 <
→
𝑥 − 𝑎 < 0 or 𝑎 − 𝛿 < 𝑥 < 𝑎 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 ⟺ ∀ 𝜀 > 0, ∃ 𝛿 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. −𝛿 < 𝑥 − 𝑎 < 0 → |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀
→
Right-hand limit: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 if and only if for all 𝜀 > 0, there exists a 𝛿 > 0 such that |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀 if 0 <
→
𝑥 − 𝑎 < 𝛿 or 𝑎 < 𝑥 < 𝑎 + 𝛿 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 ⟺ ∀ 𝜀 > 0, ∃ 𝛿 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 0 < 𝑥 − 𝑎 < 𝛿 → |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀
→
Positive infinite limit: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ if and only if for all 𝐽 > 0, there exists a 𝛿 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐽 if 0 <
→
|𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐽 > 0, ∃ 𝛿 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 0 < |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿 → 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐽
→
Negative infinite limit: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ if and only if for all 𝐾 < 0, there exists a 𝛿 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾 if 0 <
→
|𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐾 < 0, ∃ 𝛿 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 0 < |𝑥 − 𝑎| < 𝛿 → 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾
→
Limit to positive infinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 if and only if for all 𝜀 > 0, there exists a 𝐽 > 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| <
→
𝜀 if 𝑥 > 𝐽 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 ⟺ ∀ 𝜀 > 0, ∃ 𝐽 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 > 𝐽 → |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀
→
Limit to negative infinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 if and only if for all 𝜀 > 0, there exists a 𝐾 < 0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| <
→
𝜀 if 𝑥 < 𝐾 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = 𝐿 ⟺ ∀ 𝜀 > 0, ∃ 𝐾 < 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 < 𝐾 → |𝑓(𝑥) − 𝐿| < 𝜀
→
74
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
Case 1: Positive infinite limit to positive infinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ if and only if for all 𝐾 > 0, there exists a 𝐽 >
→
0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐾 if 𝑥 > 𝐽 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐾 > 0, ∃ 𝐽 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 > 𝐽 → 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐾
→
Case 2: Positive infinite limit to negative infinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ if and only if for all 𝐾 > 0, there exists a 𝐽 <
→
0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐾 if 𝑥 < 𝐽 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐾 > 0, ∃ 𝐽 < 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 < 𝐽 → 𝑓(𝑥) > 𝐾
→
Case 3: Negative infinite limit to positiveinfinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ if and only if for all 𝐾 < 0, there exists a 𝐽 >
→
0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾 if 𝑥 > 𝐽 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐾 < 0, ∃ 𝐽 > 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 > 𝐽 → 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾
→
Case 4: Negative infinite limit to negative infinity: lim 𝑓(𝑥) = −∞ if and only if for all 𝐾 < 0, there exists a 𝐽 <
→
0 𝑠𝑢𝑐ℎ 𝑡ℎ𝑎𝑡 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾 if 𝑥 < 𝐽 or lim 𝑓(𝑥) = +∞ ⟺ ∀ 𝐾 < 0, ∃ 𝐽 < 0 𝑠. 𝑡. 𝑥 < 𝐽 → 𝑓(𝑥) < 𝐾
→
1
lim =0
→ 𝑥
1
3 𝐽= Set J =
𝜀
1
4 𝑥> Since ε > 0, this root will exist. Use the fact that x > J.
𝜀
1
5 𝑥 > Raise both sides to the nth power.
𝜀
1
6 <𝜀 Get the reciprocals of both sides
𝑥
1 Since everything is positive, we can use absolute value and
7 −0 <𝜀
𝑥 subtract 0 from the left side.
1
lim =0
8 → 𝑥 From statement 2
∎
75
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
1
lim =0
→ 𝑥
1
3 𝐾=− Set K = −
𝜀
1
4 𝑥<− Since ε > 0, this root will exist. Use the fact that x < K.
𝜀
1
5 |𝑥| > Get the absolute value of both sides.
𝜀
1
6 |𝑥 | > Raise both sides to the nth power
𝜀
1
6 <𝜀 Get the reciprocals of both sides and use the fact that ε > 0.
𝑥
1 Since everything is positive, we can use absolute value and
7 −0 <𝜀
𝑥 subtract 0 from the left side.
1
lim =0
8 → 𝑥 From statement 2
∎
Then let’s prove the second fact:
76
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
77
REFERENCES
Books
Mercado, J. P. & Orines, F. B. (2016). Next century mathematics 11: Basic calculus. Phoenix Publishing House, Inc.
Online Sources
Continuity.aspx
Dawkins, P. (2018, May 29). The Definition of the Limit. Paul’s Online Notes. https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/
CalcI/DefnOfLimit.aspx
Dawkins, P. (2018, May 29). Limits at Infinity, Part I. Paul’s Online Notes. https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/Classes/
CalcI/LimitsAtInfinityI.aspx
Dawkins, P. (2018, May 30). Proof of Various Limit Properties. Paul’s Online Notes. https://tutorial.math.lamar.edu/
Classes/CalcI/LimitProofs.aspx
limit-of-11nne.html
Math Easy Solutions. (2013, May 2). Proof of Squeeze Theorem [YouTube video]. https://www.youtube.com/
watch?v=vzJ7SEBLuWo
&oldid=977172792
Prepared by: Nathaniel M. Cabansay, BSCpE
EXTRAS
This set of modules deals with limits, the first set of Calculus-related topics dealt with in many Calculus courses,
be it in Engineering, Computer Science, or other courses requiring Calculus. This concept is needed in further
topics such as derivatives and integrals, which will in turn have more applications in fields such as Engineering,
Sciences, Computer Science, and other courses.
“Give a man a fish, he will eat for a day. Teach a man to fish, he will eat every day.” – Unknown origin
“It is not of the essence of mathematics to be conversant with the ideas of number and quantity.” – George Boole
“Don’t walk behind me; I may not lead. Don’t walk in front of me; I may not follow. Just walk beside me and be my
friend.” – Albert Camus
79